Wrong BOM version when creating a subcontracting PO

Hello,
I am trying to create a subcontracting PO. First, I enter the material I want to order and the item category for subcontracting (L) in the order item; then I press Enter. However, the screen for component processing is NOT displayed. For this reason, I selected "Material data" and clicked on the "Components" button and BOM is displayed. But, there are two BOM versions for this material and only get one of them (the wrong one). How can I get the right one?
Regards,
Carlos Piana
Functional Leader MM
La Universal
Guayaquil, Ecuador

Hello,
I clicked on "New BOM explosion" but I still get the same BOM explosion. Should I change the master data somewhere?
Carlos

Similar Messages

  • Wrong date format when creating a universe based on a MS Analysis cube

    Hi,
    When creating a universe based on a MS Analysis 2008 cube the date objects from the cube are created in the universe with CHAR format when it should be DATE format
    I have tried to resolve the issue by modifying the date object in the universe with MDX but with little success.
    I wonder if it is an error in the cube and that it actually should be possible to get the correct date format from the cube when creating the universe automatically in the universe design tool.
    The date object is organised in a hierarchy.
    Any ideas? - both to resolve the issue by using MDX in the universe object properties or in the cube.
    The universe design tool is version 4.0 SP2 patch 5
    /Kim

    Oh I knew I was missing something. Ok version 2.
    I think in general this approach would work. I assumed you are starting from 1 and resetting to 1.
    There should be error handling and so forth that is not here. Probably some details need to be tweaked.
    So the key thing here AFAIK is to put the sequence reset in an autonomous procedure. Exactly how to do that may need to be modified.
    PS this version has a bug. After the reset needs to change the increment of the sequence back to 1.
    and I left that out. oops!
    /* testtrigger */
    /* previously:
    create table mytable (
    myprimary_key number(10) primary key,
    column1 number(2)
    create sequence mysequence
    start with 1
    increment by 1
    maxvalue 99
    nocache;
    create table mylastdate (lastdate date);
    insert into mylastdate(lastdate) values (trunc(sysdate));
    create or replace procedure reset_mysequence (in_correction number) is
    pragma autonomous_transaction;
    begin
    execute immediate 'alter sequence mysequence INCREMENT BY ' || in_correction || ' MINVALUE 1';
    update mylastdate set lastdate = trunc(sysdate);
    commit;
    end;
    show errors;
    create or replace trigger mytrigger
    before insert on mytable for each row
    declare
    tmpdate number(8) := null;
    lastdate_used number(8) := null;
    correction number := null;
    lastseq number(2) := null;
    begin
    if INSERTING then
    tmpdate := to_number(to_char(sysdate,'YYYYMMDD'));
    select to_number(to_char(lastdate,'YYYYMMDD')) into lastdate_used
    from mylastdate;
    select mysequence.currval into lastseq from dual;
    /* when this displays in the forum it shows lt gt as nothing on the screen
    so this should be lastdate not equal to tmpdate */
    if lastdate_used <> tmpdate and lastseq > 1 then
    correction := -(lastseq - 1);
    reset_mysequence(correction);
    end if;
    :new.myprimary_key := (tmpdate * 100) + mysequence.nextval;
    end if;
    end;
    show errors;
    Edited by: lake on Nov 30, 2010 10:39 AM
    Edited by: lake on Nov 30, 2010 10:52 AM

  • Can't see 23/24 viewer version when creating new folios

    Hi, I have the latest versions of the Folio Builder panel for CS5 (12.4.2.20121107_m_704679) but when I attempt to create a new folio I'm not given the option to choose v23 or 24 folios. 20,21,22 are the only options. Any reason this would happen? Thanks!

    In CS5 and CS5.5, you will also need to upgrade your Folio Producer tools in order to get the latest support for those viewer versions.
    Mac: http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/collection.jsp?collID=4&platform=Macintosh
    Windows: http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/collection.jsp?collID=4&platform=Windows

  • How can I select alternative BOM when creating subcontract purchase order?

    In our business, a finish good material always has different production versions at the same time. Each of production versions has its own alternative BOM. When I create a planned order, I can select wanted BOM through specifying production version.
    But, when I creating subcontract purchase order, there is no field for me to specify the production version or which alternative BOM I prefer. In this case, I need to create a planned order at first. And then, convert the planned order to purchase. Only through this way, I can create a subcontract purchase order with my wanted BOM.
    So, I wonder if there is any way to select alternative BOM directly when creating subcontract purchase order.
    Thanks a lot!
    Regards
    Robbie

    Dear Mr. MM
    can you give me additional information about your solution?
    BUT I would not expect the sytem to offer you during the Purchasing cycle the different Production Versions as it is not meant to be. I remember having the same requirement some time ago and we solved it the way I described above, additionally we created a Pop up window with a user exit during the PO creation which offered the different production versions and if the one linked with the quota arrangement, the standard PV, is used in the PO.
    We also have the same problem, we activated businessfunction SCM_GEN_02 so that it is possible to have several production versions for one supplier, but unfortunatly it is not possible to change the production version in the purchase order. (business function does not seem to be very integrated)
    So i would be very interested in your solution because acually it seems that i have to modify the sap standard.
    Thank you and best regards
    Lisa

  • Inactive BOM still can create Production Order

    Hello,
    we can still do CO01 and CO41 and save it to create a production order even the BOM was been inactive already, and the material we use has Selection Method in MRP4 set as 3 = Selection only by production version.
    but as we check the PO 100021563 it is master data tab we see it pick production version ACA, which has BOM alternative 1 (status 02 already) this is inactive so it must not pick by the production order this production version. the active alternative BOM is 4 today and in the MRP4 its production version is ACD this is valid for us for the material to be produce a PO.
    how it happen when we create the PO 100021563 pick inactive alt bom by means of picking a production version ACA? please help us for this one how could we limit this material when doing CO01 or CO41 will not pick production version with alt BOm inactive already.
    please SIVA and R.BRAHAMANKAR
    thanks

    Hello,
    those three production version has also three alternative bom which is already inactive, the remaining PV4 is the one with new and active alternative bom, but in our case when doing production order SAP pick PV1 which has already inactive bom in it. we expect PV4 will be the one to pick to have an Order, but when PV1,PV2, and PV3 this will not allowed any production order to be create since it enclose ALT BOM was in status 02.
    and also does in MRP4, under the selection method, INDIVIDUAL/COLL can affect the selection of production version when creating order? what does the following works:
    blank = ?
    1 = individuals requirements only
    2 = collective requirements only
    thanks
    Edited by: Ryan on Dec 12, 2008 9:14 AM

  • Is it possible to create a BOM  for ROH material for Subcontracting

    Dear Guru's
    As per my knowledge BOM is needed only for HALB & FERT material even if for subcontracting purpose. So is it possible to create a BOM for ROH material for Subcontracting?. Pls help me to get a soln ?
    Regards
    Ragesh

    Ragesh,
    When you are subcontracting the material, the Std SAP says that the material type should be HALB and not ROH.
    But if client requires for any reason that the material should be ROH only, there is no problem in chaning the settings.
    Sumeet

  • When creating a PDF from a PPT or Keynote application on a Mac using Acrobat X Pro, how do I ensure it can be opened on a PC? Do I need to save as a particular version of Acrobat?

    When creating a PDF from a PPT or Keynote application on a Mac using Acrobat X Pro, how do I ensure it can be opened on a PC? Do I need to save as a particular version of Acrobat?

    The system was not my own, it was on a PC belonging to the school where I teach. The error message referred to Acrobat 9.0, so I assume that the problem is to do with the version on which the file was created being more recent than that on which I attempeted to open it.

  • When creating iframes for htm pages, I pdfs work just fine in all versions of Firefox. However, when I construct an iframe for an htm to be displayed on an htm

    ''duplicate of https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/973637 - locking''
    When creating iframes for htm pages, I pdfs work just fine in all versions of Firefox. However, when I construct an iframe for an htm to be displayed on an htm, Firefox 24 will not load the htm/iframe.

    Hello,
    In order to better assist you with your issue please provide us with a screenshot. If you need help to create a screenshot, please see [[How do I create a screenshot of my problem?]]
    Once you've done this, attach the saved screenshot file to your forum post by clicking the '''Browse...''' button below the ''Post your reply'' box. This will help us to visualize the problem.
    Thank you!

  • Referencing condition values when creating return order is wrong...

    Hello Experts,
    Lets say I have a billing document that has 3 line items namely material A, B and C.
    Now, I created a return order for material A with 2 separate line items because of different
    storage locations. Now, is there a user-exit that lets my 2nd line item copy the condition values of the
    1st line item of the reference billing document? because they are of the same material(A).
    Currently, we are having problems when creating a return order having multiple line items of the same material
    because the succeeding line items copies the wrong condition values of the referenced billing doc.
    For example:
    Original billing document:
    Material      Discount
    A          100
    B          200
    C          300
    Return Order:
    Material     Discount
    A          100
    A          200
    A          300
    The succeeding line items of my return order must point to the first line item since they are of the
    same material. Hope you can help me guys. Thank you and take care!

    You may need to explore in the copy control definition, especially the pricing type defined. Check if any customized requirements exists for condition which checks w.r.t to the document number instead of reference document number item.

  • "Create new versions when making adjustments" - Lion, Aperture 3.1.3

    I recently upgraded to Lion, and then shortly thereafter to Aperture 3.1.3.
    While I don't seem to share everybody else's issues with Lion nor with Aperture, I do have one of my own.
    In Preferences -> Advanced, I have a box titled "Create new versiont when making adjustment."  It is checked.
    My expectation, (and the way things have always worked under Snow Leopard) is that if I select a master image and begin to make adjustments to it from _any_ feature int he adjustments pallette, that I new version will be created, stacked next to the original, and that the changes I am making will be made to the new version.  This is _not_ what is happening.
    Instead, the changes are applied directly to the master image.  This is annoying, and will probably be fixed in an update...    I thought the work around would be to manually create the version for the time being, until Apple sorts this out.  That didn't work either.
    If I manually create a version, and then proceed to make adjustments to the version, Aperture dows what I would have expected in the first place.  It creates a new version and applies the changes to that.
    For example, I right click on a master image and select "New Version form Master"  A new version, titled "... - Version 2" is created.  When I begin to modify Version 2, a new version is created titled "... - Version 3" and my changes are applied to this version... leaving me with the master and Version 2 which are now duplicates of each other.
    Even more interesting is this:
    Images that were imported into Aperture prior to the Lion upgrade, and the 3.1.3 patch behave as expected, in that a new version is created when adjustments are applied to a master image.
    Images that were imported into Aperture _after_ the upgrade to Lion and the 3.1.3 patch act as describd above, in that no new version is created when adjustments are applied to a master image.
    So...  Here are the questions:
    1. Is anybody else experiencing this?
    2. Does anybody know how to restore the correct behavior?

    Alright,   I have solved the problem.
    Some time ago, I thought it might be neat to import pictures with the Auto Exposure adjustment in place.  What I didn't realize was that if the master image is in the library with adjustments on it, it downs't create a new version when you add additional adjustments.
    As soon as I disabled that, and imported some new imges the probelm went away.
    Also... I went back to the six or seven project that I had imported while use Auto Exposure and removed that adjustment from those images...  
    All is resolved.

  • System should not creates new version when value of PO increased..

    Hi Experts,
    Need your help to solve this problem. When i increase value of PO it should retrigger Release strategy but it creates version first, then i have to tick completion indicator and check then only release strategy retriggers..
    It should not create new version when change po
    Please check below screenshot
    Please help

    Hi
    Please reveiw the following points in note
       - 493900 FAQ: Release Strategy
          4.  Why is the release strategy not determined?
         "If you use version management, the determination of the release
          strategy starts when the version is completed.
          You complete a version by setting the "version completed"
          indicator in the version tab."
       - 662993 Resetting an already occurred release
         You edit a purchasing document with release strategy.
         You change the quantity or the price. In spite of that, the
         already set release is not reset.
    The release strategy works the same with or without version management
    active - the only difference in case - version management is active -
    is that if release is to be reset, it will be reset only on version
    I hope this helsp to clarify this issue
    Kind regards,
    Lorraine

  • Preference to "Create New Versions when making adjustments"

    Isnt the option in Preferences "create new version when making adjustments" seem irrelevant when Ap doesnt touch the original (master) anyway? How is this option intended to be used? Most of the imags for me would be slight tweeks so I wouldnt necessarily want every one of those showing as a 'full new version'.

    yeh, that would seem logical wouldn't it - to create a new version for each session... but that's not what happens.
    i mostly use the HUD and don't close between adjustments but i do sometimes use the side panel which i also don't hide/close between adjustments. i can't remember whether making adjustments via the side panel creates new versions for every adjustment, certainly this behaviour happens when i use the HUD and i'm fairly sure i would have tried the side panel to avoid this annoying behaviour but i can't say for sure and will have to test the side panel behaviour next week if i get time.
    even with the preference for 'create new versions' turned off, there seem to be certain images that always create a new version when i make an adjustment - whether using the HUD or side panel. I haven't figured out an exact pattern to this but it seems to be something to do with those files that have been 'sent to external editor'. subsequent adjustments within aperture always create a new version - haven't a clue why...
    just as an aside, sometimes when i make adjustments (particularly sharpening or noise reduction) i get single pixel wide horizontal lines of noise appearing across my images, which are there when i print or export too, not just screen artifacts due to a badly processed preview...hmmm...anyone else noticed this or has found a post about ways to avoid this?
    all that said, aperture is a godsend for my workflow
    MacBook 2.0 White   Mac OS X (10.4.8)  

  • When creating a multi page document, some of my thumbnails become linked and can't be separated for editing. What am I doing wrong and how do I correct this?

    When creating a multi page document, some of my thumbnails become linked and therefore impossible to rearrange. What am I doing wrong and how do I correct this?

    The pages in sections stick together because the text flows between the pages.
    Insert a section break to isolate pages between sections.
    Now this all works in Pages '09, unfortunately Pages 5 doesn't let you.
    Peter

  • I used the wrong year when creating an account, now it tells me im to young no matter what year i use?

    I used the wrong year when creating an account, now it tells me im to young no matter what year i use?

    Have you tried just exiting the setup and try trying later?

  • Which bom explosion/dependent req. used when creating order

    a material's production version ( MRP4 in material master) has 2 or more versions and all versions are valid. when creating a production order, which version will the system take?

    Dear,
    If you are creating the production order manually through CO01,if your order type dependent parameter for the order type in OPL8
    is having manual selection of prod version means the system will give the pop up to select the production version.
    If it's an automatic selection means the system by default will pick the first production version,if you are having more than 1
    production version for same lot size and validity.
    Check and revert.
    Regards
    S Mangalraj
    Edited by: Mangalraj.S on Aug 25, 2010 12:48 PM

Maybe you are looking for