Wrong Depreciation value for subsequent years for further acquisition

Hi All,
Need immediate help...I have a dep key with Unit of Produciton. The method being used is Usage/Remaining and the Base Value is 24 - Net Book Value.
I had posted an acq. on 01.01.2009...it depreciates perfectly as per my usage--say till period 5. Then another acq. was posted in july - and was consumed fully in Feb 2010..
Another acq. was posted in May, 2010...Now my dep for period Jan and Feb is getting reversed and Dep. on Base Value - Balance Carried forward and New Acq - is being calculated, although i had exhausted my balance in Feb itself.
I do not want to go by Sub Assets route...
Why is such a calculation being done???

Hi Kartik
Thanks for showing interest in my query...If i am not worng, SAP note mentions to change everything to Start of the year...i had tried it but was of no help.
Regards
Ankit

Similar Messages

  • Planned depreciation value for each period

    Hi,
    Where can I get the planned depreciation value for each period? I need the fields for customised report.
    Thank you

    Hi,
    You can get the dep planned values for the each period by using SAP standard report S_ALR_87012936.
    In the selection screen of that report, click on All selections button on application tool bar. Then you will be able to see the all the available fields for selection.
    Choose evaluation period as Month.
    Now execute it. After getting output, you need to go for change layout and adopt fileds like Dep 01-2010, Dep 02-2010, Dep 03-2010....Etc till Dep 12-2010.
    This will fix your requirement.
    Thanks,
    Srinu

  • Additional values for further F4 help

    Hello all,
    In the current IAC WSSA_ENTRY (sales order) the parameter ~sources contains all values for the F4help; i need additional values for further F4helps;unfortunatly the parameter is fully occupied; setting a second parameter ~sources in the service is not possible.
    Is there any possibility the add addionally values to the parameter ~sources? Can I add the values in the handler (ICF) to any enhancement, exit?
    Thanks & regards,
    Kurt

    Hello Kurt,
    Sorry, my suggestion is to add your customizations to a copy of the one of the existing ~sources.  Use an include or something like that.  It looks like the maximum length is 132 for the value of ~sources.
    Edgar
    Edited by: Edgar Chuang on Nov 25, 2008 12:38 PM

  • Wrong depreciation calculated for base value 04 + EA-FIN activated

    Hi,
    after activating EA-FIN, depreciation for assets using base value 04 (= half of replacement value) is calculated wrong.
    While AW01 for a particular asset shows depreciation values based on the FULL replacement value (like it would be base value 03) AW01_AFAR (the u201Coldu201D asset explorer) shows the correct depreciation for base value 04.
    The wrong base value can also be seen using the "display depreciation calculation" button in both transactions.
    There are no enhancements for base value determination active.
    I didnu2019t find any SAPNET notes nor SCN entries regarding this case, any ideas?
    Best regards, Christian

    For what it's worth, I did a search and didn't find anything either. 
    It sounds like you've already tried this, but if the base value (the actual $$ value) is different in the trace on both tcodes then you have a problem.  I would be sure to recalculate the values when you enter AW01 and AW01_AFAR to ensure that it's correct before looking at the trace.
    The formula for the replacement value is: 
    ( u_ganlc-kansw + u_ganlc-answl +
                   u_ganlc-kmafa + u_ganlc-mafav + u_ganlc-zusma +
                   u_ganlc-mafam + u_ganlc-mafal +
                   u_ganlc-kaufw + u_ganlc-aufwv +
                   u_ganlc-aufwp + u_ganlc-aufwl ) / 2 .
    I'd look at ANLC for the asset and do the calculation yourself to confirm the value. 
    You've probably done all of that so I predict an OSS message in your future !
    -nathan

  • Display planned depreciation values for depre areas

    Hi,
    I have 2 depreciation areas, 01 for book and 04 for local depreciation.
    How do I display the periodic depre values for 04 in asset explorer posted values tab  if I don't want to maintain a derived depre area?
    Your assistance will be greatly appreciated.
    Thank you

    Hi,
    if area 04 does not post, you will not get any info on the "posted" values tab. Simply because this area does NOT post to G/L then.
    Only parallel depreciation areas, or real depreciation areas which are part of the definition of a POSTING derived depreciation area get also period values stored, this is the exception.  But a standalone real depreciation area, which does not post and which is not parallel will not store period depreciation values.
    Regards,
    Markus

  • Wrong SNMP values for ciscoEnvMonSupplyStatus

    Hello everyone,
    we are facing the following issue: the SNMP poll is showing wrong values for ciscoEnvMonSupplyStatus when at the same time the "show env all" shows that there is nothing wrong with the power supplies.
    Here is the example:
    ciscoEnvMonSupplyStatusDescr.1057   Sw1, PS1 Faulty, RPS NotExist                  OctetString                  192.168.49.28:161
    ciscoEnvMonSupplyStatusDescr.1058   Sw1, PS2 Faulty, RPS NotExist                  OctetString                  192.168.49.28:161
    ciscoEnvMonSupplyState.1057                                     notFunctioning (6)                        Integer                          192.168.49.28:161
    ciscoEnvMonSupplyState.1058                                     notFunctioning (6)                        Integer                          192.168.49.28:161
    ------------------ show env all ------------------
    FAN 1 is OK
    FAN 2 is OK
    FAN PS-1 is OK
    FAN PS-2 is OK
    SYSTEM TEMPERATURE is OK
    System Temperature Value: 31 Degree Celsius
    System Temperature State: GREEN
    Yellow Threshold : 46 Degree Celsius
    Red Threshold    : 60 Degree Celsius
    SW  PID                 Serial#     Status           Sys Pwr  PoE Pwr  Watts
    1A  C3KX-PWR-350WAC     AZS161803GQ OK              Good     Good     350/0
    1B  C3KX-PWR-350WAC     AZS161803GT OK              Good     Good     350/0
    I have seen that this is a more or less a known issue and there are plenty of bugs for it, but exactly for our hardware and IOS (C3560E Software (C3560E-IPBASEK9-M), Version 15.0(2)SE2, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)) I cannot find any exact information.
    Please, advice if we are hitting some known bug which I cannot locate.
    Thanks,
    Vesselin
    SW  Status          RPS Name          RPS Serial#  RPS Port#
    1   Not Present     <>

    Hi ,
    I have issue while generating alerts for the CISO nexus device.
    snmp laert tool: Solarwinds error : The OID is not supported,
    Can anyone tell me the OID for the CISCO nexus 2k, 5K devices.
    I am trying to generate the Temp alert.
    THANKS

  • FM returns wrong total value for Limit type PO's

    Hi all,
    I am working on SRM 5.0 (SP13) ECS.
    I have implemented the BADI "BBP_WFL_APPROVAL_BADI" for determining the Approvers for PO whenevr a PO is changed.If the diference between the Old PO value and new PO value is > 1000 and the approval text field(custom text under "Documents" link) is set to "YES",then the WF approval is required and the approvers are determined.
    The above logic works fine for the Standard type PO's where the difference between the old value and new value is determined using FM "BBP_PD_PO_GETDETAIL"  by passing the GUID (for the change version and the active vesion) obtained at runtime in the BADI.
    However for the limit type PO's,whenevr I change the total value for the Limit item,I see that the FM "BBP_PD_PO_GETDETAIL" doesnt return the changed value but  always returns blank!
    Bcause I need to check bth the values i.e. Custom text set to "YES" as well as Total value diff ,I cant use the start conditions in tcode SWB_COND.ALso I need to fetch the approvers based on the price diff so I need this value at runtime in the BADI using the FM "BBP_PD_PO_GETDETAIL".
    Please advise why the FM is not returning the changed values for the Limit type PO and is there any other way(other table/FM) to get the changed value at runtime for the LIMIT type PO.
    Thanks for your time.
    Edited by: Rads1234 on Nov 18, 2010 4:39 AM

    Thanks for the rpely.
    Yes.I am using the GUID available at runtime in the  BADI "BBP_WFL_APPROV_BADI" which is the current change version GUID.I tried using that GUID to get the data from both FM as well as CDHDR and CDPOS tables.
    I think this is something related to LImit type PO because for Standard type PO's the FM returns the corretc changed value (as in the screen) for the change version GUID.I fail to understand why the changed values are shwon on the screen but are not stored anywhere in the system before actually ordering the PO!

  • Depreciation posting for additional acquisitions..............

    < MODERATOR:  Message locked.  Please read the [Rules of Engagement|https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki?path=/display/home/rulesofEngagement] before posting next time.  Please use an appropriate......... subject....... >
    Hi ,
    i am strucked with posting of depreciation of an asset.
    Plz any one can suggest solution for below scenario : --
    Company  code : ABC LTD.
    Fiscal Year       : April,2008 to March,2009
    Cost an Machinery : 1,20,000 , April 1st is Aquisition date.
    Dep Method is Units of Production .
    Depreciation for each month is 10,000 based on the formula.
            i executed depreciation of Machinery in the months of April,May,June also. (Depreciation amount for 3 months is  30,000  )
         in the month of 1st July , additional acquisitions posted.
    the amount is rs 1,20,000. here the problem is :
    the depreciation amount is showing 50,000 ,while iam executing depreciation run in the month of Jully,31st.
             depreciation for additional asset should be calculated from month of 1st jully onwards but its calculatin form the month of april onwards.
    Thanks in advance,
    Kiran

    Hi Kiran,
    this is the correct behaviour in the capitalization year. Please consider OSS notes 53166 and 92925, which contain an explanation of that behaviour and a workaround.
    Regards,
    Markus

  • IDoc - Wrongly Picking value for outbound.

    Guru's
    Once save the sales order, a out bound idoc will trigger and goto a non sap system.. till date its picking right values but now its not picking one number(that is year) <b>Voyage number</b> starts with year example 2007 is equal to 7 and other two digits  is serial numabre.. 701, 702, etc....now its not picking 7,  only taking 03, 04.. ...
    any inputs...
    Ramki

    Debugging is the only option to find your problem.
    Put breakpoint on segment which you are having problem. or user exit, if you have any.
    If you are not familiar how to debug for outbound idocs do the following steps.
    1) Cllick header-->output
    2) Repeat output type
    3) Select output type and click Further data and select dispatch time to 1(Send with periodic schedule job).
    4) Save.
    5) Go to Transaction WE15 or execute RSNAST00 program
    6) Select your output type..input object key-->nothing but document number(eg..sales order number).
    select output type and transmission medium.
    7) Now cursor stop at your break point".
    "Rewards point if usefull"
    Thanks,
    Narayan

  • Wrong depreciation calculation for upload assets

    Hi
    I am uploading for US company with FY as Jan to December.
    I have to upload assets with value as on 31stJuly 2010. It means SAP should calculate depreciation from August 2010.
    Depreciation is on life basis
    One asset purchased on 01.11.2009 with Value $ 585.59. WDV as on 31st July is 355.21. Total life is 23months. In AS91, depn start date is 01.11.2009 with useful life as 01 year and 11 period. In expired life, its showing as 94 under period column.
    Now in asset transfer config, i gave the transfer date as 31.07.2010 and last period of depreciation in previous system, i gave it as 7th period of year 2010 (ie. July 2010)
    Now when i saw depreciation in AW01n for august 2010, it shows that remaining depreciation is fully written off in august 2010.
    Its not flowing to next month.
    Any idea why is writing off depreciation fully in next month itself

    Hi..
    After transfer old asset to new asset system automatically transfer all the balance to the new asset including depreciation Up to July
    After that please check in the new asset master in the depreciation area tab depreciation start date...it must be 1st August
    So based on that date depreciation will be calculate 
    I hope you will get some idea based on this suggestions.
    Thanks and Regards
    sudharshana vamsi

  • Wrong commitments value for a wbs element

    H Experts
    I have a WBS element and entered a PO commitment with subsequent partial GR and IRs.
    But my cooitment report does not get reduced with subsequent IRs and it got updated with first IR only.
    Please suggest what would be the reason for wrong commitment report.
    Thanks
    ramSiva

    run the programs RAKNBU01and  there is a note  for incorrect committments........... 1491430     Incorrect Commitments for Service Items and
    1492317     Incorrect commitments after posting service entry sheet
    Edited by: reena ghadge on Nov 25, 2011 12:54 PM

  • Using cumulated values for further calculation in a bex report

    Hi ya'll,
    I have a problem with using cumulated values in a bex report.
    the report has three lines:
    Values 1:    100    200  300
    Values 2:    10      5     40
    Values 3:    1000  500  4000
    The values of row 3 is a formula multiplying the values from row 1 and 2... My problem is that the values of row 3 are wrong - for example 200*5 isn't supposed to result in 500 !!
    I figure the reason is that the values of row 1 is a cumulated result, meaning the <i>actual</i> value of the second column of the first row i 100 (and not 200).
    How can I ensure that my formula for row 3 uses the <b>cumulated</b> result from row 1, instead of the underlying result ?.

    Create a column structure with Actual Value columns as well as cumulated value columns. Hide Actual Value Columns from display.
    Example :
    Actual1 | Actual 2 | Actual 3 | *** 1 | *** 2 | *** 3 |
    100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 200 | 300 |
    You can create a forumla to calculate Value 3 : (Actual 1 * Value 2 ).
    I guess you are using Cell Referencing to achieve this.

  • Wrong ASCII values for control characters in Variables and Stack Call in CVI2013?

    Hi,
    I think there is an error in  "Variables and Call Stack" window if you want to look for your variables in ASCII format.
    The control characters (0 -  31) are not shown correct. They are shifted 2.
    For example:
    Character in Decimal format is 10 (LF) but when you are chancing to ASCII format it is showing \012.
    The same with 13 (CR). This character is \015 in ASCII format.
    I think that was no problem in CVI2012.
    Best regards
    Gunther
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    I'm not using CVI2013 yes so I cannot respond regarding this specific product, but the code you are showing are the octal equivalent of the decimal value you specified: it could be that control characters (or generally speacking non-printable ones) are replaced with their octal equivalent in string view.
    Proud to use LW/CVI from 3.1 on.
    My contributions to the Developer Zone Community
    If I have helped you, why not giving me a kudos?

  • Depreciation Planned Values for an Asset

    Hi,
    Can anybody suggest how can I bring the total planned depreciation values (month wise).
    I would like to know the structure, table or function module.
    We have tried with function module ANEP_AFARECHNEN but notfetching the results.
    I know ANLC table shows the values but only for the years that are roll-forwarded by the system.
    But, I want the planned depreciation values for complete life of the asset.
    Any help would be appreciated.
    Regards,
    Ravi

    Please check RA_AFABUCHEN
    Please refer link:[http://www.se80.co.uk/sapfms/r/ra_a/ra_afabuchen.htm] for mapping the interface.
    The parameter i_afbper identifies the period

  • Post revaluation to selected depreciation area for an asset

    Hi,
    We are using depreciation area '01' for posting to GL accounts and '02' for fiscal reporting. It turned out that couple of assets had wrong depreciation key specified for depreciation area '02', which resulted in wrong depreciation calculated for '02' in last 3 years.
    We would like to correct it now, once we discovered this issue. One of the ideas was to create new revaluation transaction type which is active only for depreciation area '02', which will only change value of asset in that particuaral area without affecting correct '01',
    However, after configuring new transaction type in AO84 and assigning it to '02' depreciation area in OAXJ, when I tried to run ABAW for this asset - it gave me error AA 380.
    +Inconsistency between the specifications for transaction type Z11 and for the depreciation areas in chart of depreciation PTI.
    Depreciation area 02 is defined (in Customizing), so that it is required to take over values from area 01. However, one of these ares cannot be posted to, due to the specifications in transaction type Z11. This combination is not allowed.+
    Is it possible to configure postings only to one depreciaton area? If not - is there any other easy way of revaluating only one depreciation area for an asset.
    Thank you,
    Karol
    Edited by: Karol on Oct 6, 2011 9:54 AM

    Hi Blaz,
    Thank you for your reply. I am trying to increase the value of the asset in depreciation area 02, because due to wrong depreciation key it got fully depreciated last year in 02. I want to add the value to 02 which should have not been depreciated in last 2 years. Is there a way to increase its value using ABAA?
    Thank you,
    Karol

Maybe you are looking for