Wrong G/L account in MIRO
Hi guys,
my problem is this: I have a Purchase Order with only flag 'Invoice receipt' because I don't want good receipt and in accounting label I have a certain G/L account.
Now I run the MIRO but I click the button 'simulate' the system takes correctly the G/l account for the vendor BUT doesn't take the G/L account in the purchase Order but the G/L account 'Accrued Receivers Auto' like if I have done a Good receipt...Why the system takes this acconunt and not the mine in the PO?
thanks in advance bye
Maximilian
Hi,
can you explain the PO type.
like Frame work order or NB doc type.
If framework order.
the you might be given G/L account w r t account assignment key.
check the OBYC what G/L accoiunt assign against the account assignment key--> account modifier.
SAM
Similar Messages
-
When sending email from the Mail App or through other Apps on my iPad, my default From: address will change when I enter a To: address. This sometimes leads me to send the email from the wrong outgoing email account. It is frustrating and poor design, especially since I had already checked the From: address.
iPad 4 running iOS 8.1.33rd party email addresses have to be deleted on every synmced mac product, although I have 1and1.co.uk and my imac updatetes the mails in that account from mac mail.
Yahoo etc is a 2 step deleting process but good to get your emails pushed when on the go.
LJ
http://www.facebook.com/The.Cowboy.Party -
Wrong GR/IR account derivation for PM01 orders
Wrong GR/IR account derivation for PM01 orders which will settle to related WBS elements
Two gr/ir accounts have been determined with object class investment and overhead. The FI document picking up different accounts and not the same account for pm01/pm02/pm03/pm04 orders and the costs are getting settled to wrong wbs elements.(example a pm order with object class investment is getting settled to wbs element with object class overhead).The right account in not getting picked up.
Can anyone provide a suitable solution?
An early reply will be much appriciated
Thanks in advance
Shekhar
Edited by: V_Shekhar on May 12, 2011 6:16 PMDear Chandra,
Can you please share the screen shot of OB22 for your company code?
Regards,
Sachin -
How to block accounting by MIRO for specific type of documents.
Hello
Is there any possibility to block accounting by MIRO for specific type of document? So you could only account specific type of documents by FBV* or FB*.
Regards
Marcin ObukowiczHi,
You can try to make a validation (OB28) which will check the document type based on transaction code prerequisites.
Regards,
Eli -
No modvat clearing account in Miro
hai,
Iam not able to find the modvat clearing account in Miro.The postings are as below
In migo:
RG23A bed DR
RG23A AED DR
RG 23A SED DR
MODVAT CLEARING A/C CR
In miro:
vendor a/c cr
gr/ir a/c dr
RG23A bed dr
RG23A AED dr
RG 23A SED dr
In MIRO instead of rg23a bed,aed & sed , i have to get modvat clearing account.
Please somebody help me.Logistic General >>Tax on Goods Movement >> India >> Specify Excise Accounts per Transaction Type
GRPO Credit CENVAT clearing account
GRPO Debit CENVAT on hold account
GRPO Debit RG 23 AED account
GRPO Debit RG 23 BED account
GRPO Debit RG 23 ECS Account
GRPO Debit RG 23 SH ECS Account
GRPO Debit RG 23 NCCD account
GRPO Debit RG 23 SED account
The mainatin the G/L in OB40 as per the A/c key maintain against your condition type JMOP, JEC1,JECS .
I feel after doing these above setting ur problem will be resolved.
Biswajit -
MB11 - 411 E stock to sales order posting to wrong G/L account
MB11 attempt to post to a sales order 411 movement results in an error.
G/L account 5120000 blocked for posting in company code 1101
It is referencing the wrong G/L account. It should be 1151020resolved this. materials in question were simply setup in the wrong (old) semi finished valuation class. Had to remove all demand...reverse movements on the PO, remove from PO, remove delivery, remove from the sales order. Then change valuation class to 7910. SAP is configured to relate the correct G/L based on valuation class and movement types. good description here Movement type & G/L account determination
-
i have set up an email account on my iPad, but i can not set up same account on iMac or iPhone , it keeps saying wrong password for account, any help please
i am trying to use my sky email on imac & iphone 4gs
-
Billing Doc Automatic posting to wrong G/L Accounts
Hey,
Billing documents for certain customers are being automatically posted to the wrong G/L account in my company's (4.7) SAP system. I have checked transactions OMWB and FBKP but the G/L account in question is not linked to any activities.
Can anyone please guide through resolving this issue?
Thanks
NicholasDear Nicholas,
With VKOA settings also check OKB9 settings from Costing point of view.
Regards,
Sandeep -
Multiple Banks Accounts for Alternative Payess for Vendor Account in MIRO
Hi,
My client has a requirement when processing a Logistic Invoice Verification (MIRO):
-> A vendor account has no Bank Keys assigned to it.
-> A vendor account has 2-3 alternative payees.
-> Each Alternative payee can have more than one Bank Account.
-> In MIRO screen, the system should prompt/pop up/allow to select One of the Multiple Bank Keys associated with Alternative Payee selected.
Can someone help on this ?
Thanks,
AnkitaHi,
have a look at this thread:
Vendor with Multiple Bank Account in MIRO
Best regards. -
Changing AP recon. account in MIRO
Is it possible to change the AP recon. account in MIRO by different conditions (ex. PO account assignment) ? Thanks a lot!!
No its not possible.
As per the settings in GL master ( reconciliation account for Vendor), it will always check that the account used as reconciliation account is seated in Vendor Master data.
The postings will go for a toss, dont try.
Regards
Bharat -
Change AP recon. account in MIRO
Is it possible to change the AP recon. account in MIRO by different conditions (ex. PO account assignment) ? Thanks a lot!!
No its not possible.
As per the settings in GL master ( reconciliation account for Vendor), it will always check that the account used as reconciliation account is seated in Vendor Master data.
The postings will go for a toss, dont try.
Regards
Bharat -
Option to Choose Recon Account during MIRO
Hi All,
Is there a way to make the reconciliation (GL) account a selectable field during MIRO? I mean, can I have the option to change the recon account during invoice verification? Our users want to have such option.
I would appreciate any input. Thanks! =)
Willing to award points. =)Hi Biswajit,
There are vendors who have one or two reconciliation accounts (though only one recon account) is mainatined in the vendor master. We want to have the flexibility to choose/ change the recon account during invoice verification. I know we can change the recon account in VM prior to MIRO to reflect the correct account but it would be tedious do this everytime. What I want to know is if there is any way to control the fields (particularly recon account) during MIRO? Thanks! =) -
EBS upload wrong G/L account determination for incoming payments
Hello,
I´ve got problem with G/L account assignment in EBS upload.
Client has 3 company codes 6250, 6251 and 6300. For each CC several bank accounts.
Company codeHouse banks and Bank acccount ID is 1:1, one house bank - one bank account ID.
House banks have the same names in company codes, also the Bbank Account IDs are the same in CC.
CC 6300 has G/L accounts for bank settlements:
Main: 13102211
Incoming: 13106271
Outgoing: 13106272
Account symbol mask is +++++6+1 for icoming payments (transaction type: incoming)
main / incoming
While uploading EBS for cc 6300 system post incoming payments as 40: 13102211 / 50: 13106211
13106211 is wrong G/L account (it should be 13106271 ) and in CC 6300 is not defined, it is account from company code 6250.
Could someone please tell me how the system determine the G/L account for icoming payments? Where to make the config?
Please advise.
Thank you.
LubosYou account digits logic is little unclear. Thats why it is always important have the proper logic while formulating the accounts.
For example
If the main account is
120300 (ending with 0)
120301 (Cheque Payable Sub account 1)
120302 (Cheque Receivable Sub Account 2)
Now you can mask
+++++1 for Cheque Payments
+++++2 for Cheque Receipts
But, you said, you
main account 13102211 and incoming subaccount was 13106271
If I understand correctly
the masking should be ++++6271
Otherwise
+++67+ -
Document Tracking PO -MIGO - GR Accounting document - MIRO- A/C doucment
Hi,
I want to create a Report wherein I need to print
PO | Line item | Vendor | MIGO Number | MIGO Accounting DOC | MIRO number | MIRO accounting document
I am thinking of using
EKBE to get MIGO and MIRO
and BKPF for accounting document ( joining with REFERENCE field)
and EKKO to get vendor of PO
Wondering if BKPF is the right table to extract information of accounting document or we have some other table from which we can extract this information ??
Regards
ShreyHello,
Once if you have the MIRO number(s), you can use Table BKPF with selection field as AWKEY with will be having MIRO number+do year. There you will get BELNR the accounting doc number. No need to go to BSEG table.
By the way, what are the input(s) for your reports?
Regards -
Direct Posting to G/L Account in MIRO
Hi,
I have created a Purchase Order with following conditions
Qty 50
Price 100
Total (Accessible Value for Excise) 5000
Excise 500
Ecess 10
HSCess 5
Total Excise 515
Total+Excise For VAT 5515
VAT 744.525
Total Payable to Vendor 6259.525
Here please note that the Excise is being calculated on Rs. 5000.
When we receive the Excise Invoice, the Vendor is charging the Excise on different Accessable Value i.e. on Rs. 16000
While posting the Excise Invoice, I have changed the Accessible Value and the following FI document is generated:
24820020 CENVAT Inp SHEcess 6
24820000 CENVAT Inp BED 600
24820010 CENVAT InpEcess 12
13113920 CENVAT clearing 618.00-
While posting the Vendor Invoice, the system is showing a difference in Ecess, SHEcess & VAT Amount as shown below:
K 13000000 PK Industries PVT LTD 6,359.53-
S 13110100 GR/IR-clearing - ext procurement - Dom 5,000.00
S 13113920 CENVAT clearing 600
S 13113920 CENVAT clearing 10
S 13113920 CENVAT clearing 5
S 24638100 VAT Recoverable 744.53
To match the difference we posted the difference in VAT & Cenvat the G/L Account tab and Rs, 135.01- in Unpl. Del. Csts
The system is generating the following FI Entries
K 13000000 PK Industries PVT LTD 6,376.43- **
S 13110100 GR/IR-clearing - ext procurement - Dom 5,000.00 4500000841 EE
M 24340000 SinarMatArtCard>220gsm63.5x91" 131.03- 4500000841 EE
S 13113920 CENVAT clearing 1.95 V0
S 13113920 CENVAT clearing 0.97 V0
S 24638100 VAT Recoverable 145.01
S 13113920 CENVAT clearing 600 EE
S 13113920 CENVAT clearing 10 EE
S 13113920 CENVAT clearing 5 EE
S 24638100 VAT Recoverable 744.53 EE
My question/ doubt is:
1. Is this the correct way to pass the difference in VAT & Excise directly to G/L Accounts?
2. Why in MIRO, the BED is correct & ECess & HSCess are wrong? Is this related with Tax Procedure & Pricing Procedure?
3. What is the standard way for handling the above situation. Please note that this situation is coming for only one Excise Vendor.
Please advise.
Regards,1.In J1IEX, we could not found MRP Indicator check box in miscellaneous tab.
Where do we need to change in the Configuration.
Refer this thread [MRP indicator|Re: MRP indicator]
2.While posting the MIRO, the following entries were generated, which is wrong?
Here tax amount being calculate is wrong;
it should be 240 as per the manual. On simulation, the ECess amount is not shown.
As suggested in earlier reply,Please check tax procedure with help of FI consultant.
3.When capturing the Invoice in MIGO, MRP Indicator check box was there in Miscellaneous tab.
But the HSCess was not in editable mode, we could just enter the Basic Duty & ECess Amount.
There are lot of threads regarding hecess not editable,Pl search.
If possible can you please provide the details of the process from PO to MIRO
along with FI Entries so that I can test the same again (to get a clear cut concept of the process).
1.Purchase order with price + excise values with dealer tax code.
2. GR with excise (capture & post) or
A.Capture excise with ref. to p.o using J1IEX,tick mark mrp indicator,change excise base value,enter other excise amounts.
B. GR with ref. to ex. inv. no(In step A) - Refer exise invoice only
C. Post excise with ref. to ex. inv. no.
3. Vendor invoice ref. to delivery note no.
FI entries for GR
Stock account Dr to GR/IR a/c
Excise entries
Cenvat payable ED,CS,HECS Dr to Cenvat clearing a/c
Vendor invoice entries
GR/IR A/c,Cenvat clearing a/c,VAT/CST a/c Dr to Vendor a/c
Hope it solves problem.
Note :
I will suggest you to search forum before posting basic questions.
Don;t post multiple questions.
Edited by: Jeyakanthan A on Nov 4, 2010 3:05 PM
Maybe you are looking for
-
Hi Forum, We are developing a project using BC4J to design the middle layer. Is it possible to make the project truly database independent, i.e, the database vendor be read at runtime from a settings file? Can Jdeveloper & BC4J work with #SQL Server
-
I had a subscription to call Australia landlanes for $6/month and I wanted to get the share screen option and that said it was only available via Premium, so I canceled my Landline sub, activated Premium and it allowed me to pick a country to call to
-
Updated to Lion and can't access my own website?
I recently update to Lion and now I can't access my own website, no matter what browser I use. I can access the site fine from my work PC, but can't from home and this started after I updated to Lion. Help?
-
Is there ANY way to "drop" several videos or pictures at once (like an entire folder) instead of painstakingly dropping/dragging one image at a time? I just opened my Adope Premiere Elements 9 and after "working with" for 9 hours, I can't figure it o
-
Hello guys i know its a stupid question, but how do you put songs on your ipod manually (i do it automatically) i know you jhave to change in the options, but after that, what do you do? If i do it manualy, all my songs will stay on it right^?^..,.it