Wrong postings in MIRO

Hi all,
I have an problem while posting MIRO for customs, excise duty (condition based excise determination) for industry solution Oil & Gas.
In goods receipt it's posted appropriatelly but invoice is not cleared.
In GR : I have postings of materijal and SVO and ZKO... but in invoice instead of clearing ZKO I am getting KBS and BSX, like it is price difference.
BR,
Anchi

Hello ,
I am not sure what you meant by 'price'. Do you mean product cost for example condition type PB00 or Excise Duty i.e condition types EXD1 -> EXD6 ?
If it is product cost then, to have the new price at GR you need to activate GR Repricing by selecting 5 in the tab condition control in the PO. So there will be a repricing at GR and the new value is picked up.
If the excise duty is external and there is a change there then there are two ways the postings can happen depending on whether revaluation has been carried our or not.
You do not necessarily have to revaluate excise duty immediately after a tax rate changes. After you have entered the new ED rate in the ED rate table, the system forwards the excise duty inventory with the old ED rate. However, the system posts the ED liabilities and claims with the new ED rate. It posts the difference between the old and new ED rates to a separate account.
At the time when you want to perform an ED revaluation, the system alters the value of the excise duty inventory in accordance with the new ED rate. The system writes off the difference between the old and new ED rates.
When the system revaluates ED-paid stock, it makes postings to the
following accounts:
ED inventory account
Account for ED liabilities and claims
Account for ED differences that result from changes to the tax rate when you did not revaluate excise duty immediately after the ED rate changed
Regards ,
Jerin Ipe John .

Similar Messages

  • Complex headache in the PO history. Wrong postings in MIGO,MIRO

    Much appreciate if anyone could help on this issue.
    What we have done:
    we have a Purchase Order of 3 line items with the quantity in 300,200,100, respectively. the net price for each unit is $1.
    In MIGO:
    1. we posted MIGO with wrong quantity and wrong 'amount in LC' as follows:
    quantity = 1;
    'amount in LC' = $ 600
    2. we reverse this goods receipt with correct quantity and wrong 'amount in LC'.
    quantity = -1;
    'amount in LC' = $ -1
    In MIRO
    we wrongly posted the receipt as follows:
    Quantity = 350;
    Amount = $ 350
    then again, we did another wrong thing:
    we deleted the line items 2 and 3 in Purchase order in order to close the commitment in the Project.
    Now we are end up to a very bad situation:
    The invoice amount is not matched up to the PO, and
    the Project still can not be closed due to the commitment sitting in the Project WBS.
    what should we do now, experts???
    Much appreciate if you can help us out.
    Points are generousely assigned!
    Edited by: old rice on Apr 14, 2008 7:29 AM

    Now I start to reverse Goods Receipts posted against in 1st line item.
    In the PO history of 1st line item, we posted the following material documents.
    1. wrongly post MIGO as follows.
    Movement Type = 101
    quantity = 400;
    'amount in LC' = $ 400
    2. tried to reverse the wrong material document as follows, unfortunately, 'amount in LC' again is wrong.
    Movement Type = 122
    quantity = - 400;
    'amount in LC' = $ - 500
    3. Now we want to reverse step 2 using MBST, however we end up with the error message saying
    PU Ordered quantity exceeded by 400 EA. Message no. M7022.
    Diagnosis
    The specified stock level or quantity is exceeded by 400 EA.
    What should we do to cancel the wrongly reversal material doc in step2??
    In addition, we do not have idea how 'amount in LC' again is determined, because we did not put in ount in LC' = $ - 500.
    Much appreciate for your help!!
    Points are generiously given.

  • Wrong Vendor in MIRO

    Hi Experts,
    We have faced a problem where we have posted miro in wrong vendor code whereas actual vendor in PO was different. How it happened, how it can be controlled. Is there any system message available to control this.
    Full points for helping answers.
    Regards
    GR

    Hi,
      If you have done the invoice w.r.to PO, it would have picked the correct vendor. So, delete the invoice in tcode MR8M and do invoice w.r.to PO again.
    Regards,
    Prasath

  • Wrong BZDAT in MIRO with Asset - only in production client

    HI,
    My production system set the BZDAT in asset to 01.01.2012 when I do a MIRO in 31.12.2011 BLDAT e BUDAT.
    The same asset, no substitutions sets, in quality and develop system works correctly.... when I can search any customizing that set the wrong BZDAT in our system?
    The worst thing is that GJAHR in ANEP is 2011 with BZDAT 01.01.2012 and I don't know if forcing in ANEP a different BZDAT may create problems..... (BZDAT is in BSEG too...)

    Hi,
    There should be an ALT RULE for to be defined for the transaction in the above said path by Mr. Atif
    If your posting date and document date in diff fiscal years, then the alternative rule will come into force to derive value date.
    Regards,
    Srinu

  • Wrong postings of  TAX CODES FOR FI invoices

    Dear Friends,
    I need to create Both Input tax codes an Output Tax codes purely for FI transactions need to be posted in Cash Journal and via Fb60 and FB70 postings.
    I have created new Tax codes Specifically for FI and assigned the same in Fv11 for respective Condition type, but when they are using the same systm calculates wrong amounts as below
    Invoice amount = 10000.00, Created Output Tax Code "o1" with  2% then actual Tax amount should be 200, But where as my system calculates  196.08. when i find in the system calculates only 196.08, when i posted the same i have checked system calculates as below (Amount 10000.00 -  Tax amount 196.08 = 9,803.92), Sytem calculates the taxes on 9803.92*2  % = 196.08.
    We need the taxes should calculated should be 200 instead of 196.08.
    Can any body guide me
    Regards,
    Sandeep Jain

    Hi Sandeep,
    Go to FB00 and you will find an option to calculate taxes on net amount or gross amount. Select or remove the "tick" as the case might be.
    Thanks and Regards
    Anit

  • FAGL_FC_VAL wrong postings vendors/customers

    Hi experts,
    The issue relates to the valuation of foreign currency EHP4 ECC6.0, the calculations and postings with FAGL_FC_VAL transaction it was correctly with EHP 0, now updated to version in test environment, the transaction mentioned fails to perform postings:
    We perform first the valuation of vendors, customers and ultimately general ledger accounts, is that in making the valuation of vendors accounts to show the documents to be posted, also show customers accounts and vice versa. might help you visualize what is wrong or if you know one note that i can apply for this issue.
    thanks in advance

    The explaniation maybe is not clear sorry, but i was reading and i found 1629059, 1117360 note and I am going it to apply.
    thanks.

  • Problem while postings a MIRO for partial deliveries.

    Hi,
    We ar facing a problem
    while posting a Miro for the Planned delivery costs for the import orders.
    when we receive an item in partial consignment of the same order.
    The system will allow for the first time to post the deliver cost, after this the MIGO and MIRO will be done and cycle will be completed.
    For the second remaining consignment, the system is not allowing to post the Miro itself for the delivery costs.
    IT is giving an error message."Quantity invoiced greater than goods receipt quantity."
    We have disable GR based IV in PO
    Provide me the solution.
    Sunil

    hi,
    i hope you have done the following steps
    1) for import do MIRO first for the custom duties ( CVD, Edu Cess, S& H Cess on CVD) by selecting planned delivery cost.
    2) J1IEX ( capture) referencing material document number of MIRO.
    3) MIGO of the qty received.
    4) J1IEX ( post).
    follow the same steps for the next consignment.
    what I see is that you have mentioned the full qty against the value in MIRO.
    say ur PO qty is 10 and your partial shipment is of qty 5.
    then in first MIRO entry enter qty as 5 not 10.
    pl check your material documents of MIRO and MIGO and see what qty you have entered.
    Thanks and regard
    Rajesh

  • Problem in invoice postings in MIRO for imported material

    IMPORT SCENARIO
    Details
    1)Import PO is created with 4 conditions
    a) BCD
    b) CVD
    c) AddCVD
    d) Ecess
    e) ECS on CVD
    2) MIGO was already done
    With above conditions +1% adll SeCess on a) & b) and ) AddCVD( non deductible)
    Total 7 conditions were incorporated in to MIGO with respect to Bill of landing.
    3) at the time of MIRO
    WE need to pay Planned delivery costs to Clearing agent with respect to PO.
    Only 4 conditions ( as in PO) are appearing. How to capture remaining 1% adll SeCess on a) & b)
    Further how to change currency in MIRO ( In PO it is in USD) but clearing agent needs to be paid in INR.
    If possible please forward / send IMPORT CYCLE
    Thank U.

    Hi,
    This is the Import Cycle to be followed.
    ME21N->MIRO(Create a delivery cost for the CVD amount)->J1IEX_C->MIGO->J1IEX_P->MIRO.
    Cheers...
    Santosh

  • Wrong values for miro

    Hi,
    I am creating a PO through me21n.(Trader Scenario) where no excise value is calculated  and Vat 4% for condition type JVRD is added to the base value and addtional tax of 1% with condition type JVCA is added to the base value.
    When GR is created through MIGO excise tax is aded to the base value of PO and the total value now is PO base value + excise valve.
    When the final receipt form MIRO is generated the total invoice value which is displayed shows the addition of 4% vat aaded to it , but 1% additional tax is not added to it.
    Kindly suggest.
    Thanks,
    Siddhi

    thank you so much..!!  i check the table J_1IGRXREF as the per link suggested and found only half of the amount is updated there. i.e., 1367.00
    Again i checked the table with the excise invoice number and found two entries of 1367.00 with two material document both those two material document has the same accounting document.
    i..e,
    material document 1          1367.00           accounting document 1
    material documnt  2           1367.00           accounting document 1
    however only one material document i can able to display in MIGO with 2734.00 when i display the other document it says document does not exist.
    can i suggest to reverse the GRN and then to do it again ?

  • Amount wrong pick in MIRO

    Hi Experts,
    We are doing MIRO against a Purchase order. The FI document is genrated
    001 89  GMOH 601235     GSM FWP CWIP                             2,352,190.00
    002 96  GMOH 600086     WRX - GR/IR CLRNG AC                          2,328,140.00-
    003 50  GMOH 500348     NCCD-CUSTOME DUTY                            24,050.00-
    the Above document in INR.
    But in MIRO part the  system pick the GR/IR amount is 42329.82 in USD. 
    Debit - 42329.82                        Credit- 51000                       balance- 8670.18
    please advice.
    Regards
    Aditya

    Hi Experts,
    In GRN No.5000110596 GR/IR Account in system is credited with $ 51000 but while processing the bill using T-Code MIRO, GR/IR Account is getting debited with $ 42329.82. There is difference in both figures.
    Waiting for your reply

  • Postings during MIRO reversal

    Hi Gurus,
    I have created a PO with account assignment (GL).
    *During MIGO entries are:*
    Acct  Assignemnt(GL)   +
    GR/IR                         -
    *During MIRO:*
    GR/IR                        +
    Vendor                       -
    But during MIRO reversal via MR8M:
    Vendor                      +  (full amount)
    GR/IR                        -   (Partial)
    Acct Assignment(GL)   -   (Partial)
    Why it hits account assignment (GL) during MIRO reversal?
    Please throw some light.
    Karthi

    Thank you Srinivas.
    The entries are like this:
    MIGO:
    GR/IR                     100
    Cons. Account        100
    MIRO:
    GR/IR                     100
    Vendor A/c              100
    Reversal of MIRO:
    Vendor A/c             100
    GR/IR                      30
    Cons. Account         70
    Please clarify.
    Karthi
    Edited by: Karthi Paramas on Nov 6, 2008 10:07 AM

  • GR, wrong postings

    Hi
    While  doing goods receipt for a scheduling agreement {Price date
    category(EKPO-MEPRF) is 5 and  with the document type has the indicator 'T-
    d. cnds." (V_T161-STAKO) }  system posting PB00+NAVS value.
    example: 100 pieces of each with 1 USD value , then 100 USD is expected value.
    But during GR , system calculating 5% NAVS and posting 105 USD .
    Where as with price date category EKPO-MEPRF=2, and with out time dependent conditons the postings are normal, that is 100 USD is being posted.
    WHy system posting 105 USD value instead 100 USD. appreciate any help..thanks for your time ...
    thanks
    sudhakara

    Hi
    Found the solution.
    actually what is happening is in our case NAVS maintained at MEK2 has the value 5% at KONP-KBETR  .
    And in SPRO  M/06, NAVS is with condition class:D, calculation type A, condition category N, (standard settings are  Class D, cal type B and Con category N).
    Later changed to standard settings and fresh condition records at MEK2.   Now due to calculation type B (Fixed amount) though 5% of tax code there , KONP-KBETR (rate field) is empty.
    So, even though EKPO-MEPRF=5 (Coz system redtermines pricing during goods receipt)no tax value gets posted at GR.
    Thanks
    sudhakara

  • Wrong postings of profit, loss and write off values.

    hi,
    I am facing one problem when I am doing retirement by f-92 and ABAV. Profit, loss and loss made on asset retirement w/o revenue are not not going in their respective gl accounts defined in AO90 (Assign G/L Accounts.). The entry is going in contra account acquisition value / clearing a/c revenue from asset sale. When I see in the customizing I came to know that gl accounts for profit , loss and loss made on asset retirement w/o revenue is rightly defined in AO90 (Assign G/L Accounts) in customizing.
    thanks & regards
    Brijesh

    Hi it should be posted on a P&L account, use Trans type 200 in ABAV

  • Wrong posting for CENVAT clrng A/C in MIRO

    Dear All
    Concerned to Indian Excise.
    Scenario:1)Tax code contains BED16%,Ecs3% & CST 3%
    2)In J1ID maintained 16%(Exc Rate) & 3%(Ecs Rate) for that chapter id
    Eg:
    Base= 46500
    ED= 7440
    ECS= 223
    When i do GR i have captured the excise duty less than what tax code proposed.That is ED 4440.54 & ECS 103.00,same is posted in J1IEX.
    Now during MIRO CENVAT clearing A/C is not debiting for the same values what got posted in J1IEX.
    eg:CENVAT bedit postings in MIRO are:
    CENVAT clrng a/c 4440.54+ for BED
    CENVAT clrng a/c 133.22+ for ECS
    Pls advise how to make it happen.during MIRO I want CENVAT account should get dibit for the same value what has been posted in J1IEX.
    Reward points are sure.
    Regds

    Hi,
    Check the Tax procedure in and if it is taxinj check whether for BED altcty should be 354 and for ECS 364 both are there are not? pl check
    thanks
    prasad

  • Wrong Vendor Invoice Posting Due To Wrong Excise Tax Code

    Hi:
    We have created a Purchase Order as per below:
    Qty     10
    Price     100
    Value     1000
    Excsie 10%     0
    Cess     0
    SECess     0
    Value+Excise     1000
    VAT 5%     50
    ValueExciseVAT     1050
    (Please note that the PO was to be created in the following fashion as the Material was excisable)
    Qty     10
    Price     100
    Value     1000
    Excsie 10%     100
    Cess     2
    SECess     1
    Value+Excise     1103
    VAT 5%     55.15
    ValueExciseVAT     1158.15
    We did the Goods Receipt and the FI Document is as follows:
    24340000     Paper Stock     BSX     1,000.00
    13110100     GR/IR-ext proc     WRX     1,000.00-
    We did the Vendor Invoice Posting as follows:
    100183     SIEGWERK INDIA PVT LTD (SICPA)     KBS     1,050.00-
    13110100     GR/IR-ext proc     WRX     1,000.00
    24638100     VAT Recoverable     JP5     50.00
    The Material was issued to Cost Centre
    Later at the time of Excise Invoice posting, we came to know that the Tax Code in the Purchase Order was wrong. Here in our case, we have created separate Tax Code based on Excise Percentage. For example, V1 for VAT 5%, E1 for VAT %+Excise 10.3%.
    To post the excise invoice, we changed the Tax Code in the Purchase Order and did the Excise Posting as follows:
    24820020     CENVAT Inp SHEcess     1.00
    24820000     CENVAT Inp BED     100.00
    24820010     CENVAT InpEcess     2.00
    13113920     CENVAT clearing     103.00-
    My Question:
    a. Is this the correct way?
    b. What about the following FI Entries which got generated when we do the MIRO with actual Tax Code:
    100183     SIEGWERK INDIA PVT LTD (SICPA)     KBS     1,158.15-
    13110100     GR/IR-ext proc     WRX     1,000.00
    13113920     CENVAT clearing     JI1     100.00
    13113920     CENVAT clearing     VS9     2.00
    13113920     CENVAT clearing     JI6     1.00
    24638100     VAT Recoverable     JP5     55.15
    Please guide.
    Regards,

    Thanks Sanjoo for the reply.
    Here my worry is the all the postings have been made in SAP in Production Client.
    The User has already done the postings for MIRO & J1IEX without informing to us, and the volume of transactions is huge.
    We are in the back-log mode and at this stage, we can't go for any reversal . I am Just exploring the alternatives.
    Our MM & FI Users are little bit smart, when ever they do some mistake, they simply say "we will pass a JV" and we are not able to educate them that the JV is not a Solution. Please guide.
    Regards,
    PK

Maybe you are looking for