Actual Cost Sheet - Controlling

Hi All,
My client is mfg API (active pharmaceutical ingredients) products, whereby in process of mfg, at every stage "Mother Liquior" comes out of the reactor (A residue which can be purified and used further for production).
Now since mother liquior is an output of the process in stage of mfg, its quantity in BOM is negative (e.g  -200 Litres).
While taking cost estimate with costing variant (i.e actual cost sheet), even if material master contains price of the mother liquior, system throws error specifying "No price can be determined for Material XXXXXXX/batch/Plant".
Requesting you all to find a solution to this.
Regards,
Anktia

Hi Deva,
I have cheked the config for my costing variant for Actual Cost Sheet. The Priority given is:
1. Purchase Price
2. Moving Average Price
3. Standard Price.
Now even when SP is available in Material Master, it does not consider it and as MAP is not there, it throws the error "no price could be determined for material/batch XXXXXX"
Regards,
Ankita

Similar Messages

  • Actual Cost of Product with Price control "S"

    Dear Gurus,
    Is there any report available where we can know the Actual Costs of Materials with Price Control "S".
    In the material master field the actual cost in the "Moving Price Tab" of the material with Price Control "S" is available, but is there any report available for plant level?
    Thanks & Regards,
    Amit Dhanurdhari.

    Hi Amit,
    -- Under Standard Costing, you value your inventory at Standard Costs and any variances in Production Process will be settled to Price Difference Account. You will not be able to find out actual cost per unit. In Multi-level BOM scenario under Standard Costing (CO-PC), variances don't get rolled-up to the next level, only costs get rolled-up.
    -- Under Actual Costing - Material Ledger, You will be able to find out the Actual Cost per Unit. Variances get rolled-up to the next level.
    To explain difference between Standard Costing in CO-PC and Material Ledger briefly....
    You have given Price Indicator as "S" in the material master of "X" material (semi finisher or finished) and you are doing Standard Cost Estimate for arriving at Standard Cost per tonne. Let's say, the Standard Cost per tonne is Rs.1000/-
    Now, when you created production order for 10 tonnes and received output of 10 tonnes (GR). But the total cost incurred on that production order is Rs.1100/-. In this situation, actual cost per tonne is Rs.110.
    But, because you are following Standard Costing, When you post GR against this Production Order, inventory will be posted at Standard cost only, i.e., Rs.1000/-. and the balance of Rs.100 will be posted to Price Difference Account. (and parallally the variance of Rs.100/-) will flow to COPA.
    So, it is clear that, though, at Production Order level you can see the actual cost, at "material" level, you will not be able to see the actual cost per tonne.(as long as you are using only Product Costing and Standard Costing)
    Alternatively, if you maintain Price Indicator as "V", you will able to get the Actual Cost per tonne at material level, but there will be no scope for establishing standard cost and comparison with actual thereof.
    But, the same is possible if you are using Material Ledger (CO-ML). If Material Ledger is active, you will be maintaining "S" in the material master, still, the variances will be settled inventory and you will be able to get the actual cost per tonne. (bothe Standard cost estimate, actual cost per tonne will be possible).
    Pls revert back for further explanation
    Srikanth Munnaluri

  • In which table we can find service entry sheet no to find the actual cost

    In which table we can find service entry sheet no to find the actual cost of External service
    Service code,     Service description      Quantity     UOM,     Vendor,     Cost

    Hi,
    Total Actual Material Cost - Sum up the total cost ENWRT against the AUFNR in the table RESB and display in the report
    Total Actual External Service Cost - Provide the field AUFNR in the table EKKN and get the Purchasing document field EBELN & apply this field data in table EKPO get field NETPR and display in the out put
    For link between operation & order - Selection criterion is the order number (Field AUFNR table AUFK). The content of field AUFPL has to be used afterwards as selection criterion in the table AFVC. The selection field in this table is again AUFPL and display the field LTXA1..
    Kuber

  • KSII, Can FI postings flow into Controlling actual cost splitting.

    Can FI postings flow into Controlling actual cost splitting and actual price calculation. I am trying post FI documents(FB50,FB60,FB01) with cost elements, activity type, quantity and cost center combination. I am able to post a document and then I do all the KSS2, in KSII is not able to show me that posting. I need to know, is it possible to move from FI to CO in tcode KSII , if yes let me know i am missing something. and i am getting an error message
    Message no. KP250
    Diagnosis
    The plan or actual activity for cost center , activity type  is 0. However, costs were planned or posted in period(s) 2.

    Hi,
    As you know, the system splits all activity-independent costs to the activities according to the following three step logic:
    -split based on target costs
    -if not possible split by splitting structure
    -in the last step if the above two were not possible split by equivalence numbers set in transaction KP26
    In your case, if there is no actual quantity for the cost center, then the system will split by equivalence number. Therefore please make sure, that the cost center has actual quantity.
    Further information is also provided in note 772794.
    regards
    Waman

  • 0CO_PC_01 Cost Object Controlling: Plan/Actual Data

    Hi Experts
    I have a question regarding Cost Object Controlling: Plan/Actual Data (0CO_PC_01). I know nothing about the R/3 processes and tcodes behind this datasource.
    For a given material and a given plant do I only get records with VTYPE(Value type for Reporting) 10, but I do not understand why - I need VTYPE = 70.
    I therefore hope:
    1. That somebody could provides input on why I only get VTYPE = 10 and how I get 70 instead.
    2. That somebody can tell me the tcodes behind this datasource on the R/3 side.
    Thanks and kind regards,
    Torben

    Hi Mr. V.
    Thanks a lot for the input.
    The problem is that we have got VTYPE 30 (target) for some materials, but not for specific material A and we really do not understand why. Do you know how I can verify if the variance is present for the given material A in R/3?
    Thanks and kind regards,
    Torben
    Edited by: Torben Pedersen on Apr 3, 2009 12:00 AM
    Sorry, it is VTYPE 30 i need, not 70 as stated by mistake at first.

  • Controlling of Plan & Actual Cost of Assets

    Hi gurus
    We want to monitor our Assets plan & actual cost . In other words. whenever Accounting document will create from Asset accounting. a Controlling document should be created . for monitoring Assets Plan & Actual Cost.
    Please give Expert opnion. is this justified.
    Thanks.

    Hi James
    Your requirement is justified... but it does not work the same way as for revenue expenses
    1. You need to create the Asset recon account as Cost Element (Category 90)
    2. Assign a Statistical  Internal Order in the Asset master and enter the Budget in it. (KO22) or Enter a Plan value in KPF6.. This would serve as the Plan expense of asset
    3. When you receive the asset, it would also trigger a posting in the Internal Order... This would serve as the Actual expense on account of asset
    Now, when you execute the report for Internal order, it would give you PLan Cost cost of Internal Order vs Actual Cost...
    BR,Ajay M

  • Costing sheet in control tab of production order

    In OPL8 iam able to configure default cost accountings for production order type but why costing sheet is coming by default in production order costing section.
    Is there anyway to hide that costing sheet (AUFK-KALSM) from display to the users without effecting any cost calculation in the background.
    The purpose behind this is not to let users mess with costing sheet selection while creation. this is possible with screen variant but is there any standard settings for order type?
    Thanks in advance.

    Dear Sprint,
    No
    In my understanding we do not not have any Std setting for archiving your requirement
    Use screen variant or check for any exit
    Regards
    Madhu

  • Plan cost & Actual cost in KKBC_ORD for CO Prdn Order

    Dear Experts,
    We are not able to findout the why difference is appearing during T code KKBC_ORD order analyse for Raw materials, please suggest wht may be the wrong thing in the order?
    Before this i would like to brief you on the process.
    Raw matls are created with "V" as price control. & Finished Goods as "S" control.& we create one BOM. Say example
    My finished Goods will be 500555 code & Raw matl code will say 1001010 & 1002020.
    My BOM will contain these raw matls with qty of 1kg each.
    FG code 500555 of 2kg Bag
    Items are 1001010 & 1002020 of 1kg each.
    Here my mvng price are 2 & 4Rs for raw mtls 1001010 & 1002020 respectively.
    In Material master we define overhead key as 10% to a Finished goods (500555) in Costing view.
    1) Now i create a Base planning object T code KKE1 & I update the 10% as overhead cost & raw matls qtys as per BOM.At the end you can see the overall manufacture cost of the FGs in this case you will get for
    FG 500555 about 6.6Rs. then save it.here it is done for 1bag only.
    2) Create a CO PRDOUCTION ORDER T code KKF1 system will generate one number & save it. Now go to KKF4 add the base planning object name & enter the required qty say 10 bags...
    You can see the COGM will now 66Rs for 10 bags as per the planning.
    3)Goods issued to Order 261 with refc to BOM & Order number entred qty as 10. Sytem will calculates the qtys of raw mtals based on 10bags & save it.
    4)Goods  receipt done against CO PRDOUCTION ORDER (Finished  goods 500555).
    *5)KKBC_ORD i hav updated the CO PRDOUCTION ORDER & choosen cost trend. Here i am seeing a diffc in actual cost column & variance of 26%.but how it is possible*
    Regards
    TG

    I can think of a couple of areas where there may be differences.
    First, your CO order is probably not getting any overhead costs.  Your base planning object had 10% overhead built into it, but that is only for developing the preliminary cost estimate for the order.  The allocation of actual overhead must occur through some other method (i.e. overhead costing sheet, activity allocation, or template allocation).
    Second, the actual material costs assigned to the order will be based on the material's inventory valuation at the time they are issued to the order.  Since you said the materials are valuated at weighted average cost, it is possible that their inventory valuation changed between the time the base planning object was created and the time they were issued to the order.
    thanks,

  • Cost sheets--PRODUCT COSTING

    Hi Friends,
    In Product costing i have two scenarios-- MAKE TO STOCK AND MAKE TO SALE ORDER.
    For make to stock the costing variant will be PPC1
    AND for make to sale order the costing variant will be PPC4
    we can give different cost sheets for PPC1 AND PPC4
    But in in cost object controlling for the costing variants PPP1 (Planing) AND PPP2 (Actual) we can give only one cost sheet which is used while creating production order.
    How to provide different cost sheets(Mak to stock and Make to sale order) here in cost object controlling also?
    Any ideas ? Full points will be awarded.
    Regards
    siva

    You are unable to attach separate costing sheets to PPC1 and PPC4 because the valuation variant in the two costing variants is the same. (based on the standard config that I can see)
    SAP does not allow the valuation variant for a costing variant to be changed after creation.  To get a different cost sheet requires a different valuation variant, which would require building a new costing variant - we did do that and named it ZPC4.
    If you want the valuation different BY PLANT, go to the valuation variant tab of your costing variant and look for a selection "Valuation Variant/Plant" (in 5.0 this is a button in the upper left corner of the screen). Here you can make plant specific valuation variant configuration.  We use this for manufacturing plants - all plants use ZPC2 costing variant for standard cost to be released, but each plant has their own costing sheet as defined in "Valuation Variant/Plant"
    Just remember to test, test, test.
    As to this question:  In such case make to stock and make to order can not be done in the same Plant--Right?  our make to order is for non-valuated stock, so all costs move to the sales at the standard value of the actual quantities used.  Depending on what is added to make Cost of good sold, I don't know how you would get the "Actual" on to the manufacturing order so that it would settle to the sales order. - it is after all a manufacturing order.   have you tried doing the COGS on the sales order instead of the mfg order?   
    Obviously this question is a bit out of my usual practice. Someone else may have experience with this.  But one other thought to keep in mind with your costing variants - which costing/valuation variant is used to release standard cost for inventory purposes? To me that is the value that you want associated with production orders because mfg variances will generate from that cost.
    Hope some of this is helpful
    Althea

  • Logic for cost sheet for Csost estimation

    Hi all,
    Can any one explain me what is the logic and how cost  getting captured in the cost sheet.
    when i run KKF6N...how does and from where does the system get the value and when i save the cost estimation how & where it goes and update....
    If any one can provide me details along with some examples will be very much helpfull ....
    Ur help is very much appreciated
    Regards
    SAP4ME

    Hi,
    You use overhead calculation to allocate overhead through percentage-based or quantity-based overhead rates.  The basis for the allocation is the primary cost elements that you posted as overhead costs.  In the manufacturing industry, for example, these are usually the labor and material costs.
    To perform an overhead costing, you need to define control data during Customizing and include this in a Costing Sheet.  The Costing Sheet combines all parts of the overhead costing and determines the rules for calculating the values to be posted.  The Costing Sheet is comprised of a Calculation Base, Overhead Rate, and Credits.  The Calculation Base defines the primary cost elements to which a particular overhead is to be applied.  The Overhead Rate determines to what extent the percentage-based or quantity-based overhead rate should be applied to the direct costs.  It also specifies under which conditions (dependencies) the overhead rate is to be applied.  For example, you can calculate a defined overhead rate for each plant by specifying a plant dependency.  The Credit specifies the credit object and the credit cost element.  When overhead is applied to an order in the actual, another object is credited at the same time (such as a cost center or another order).  You allocate the overhead using a special overhead secondary cost element (category 41).
    You can apply overhead to both plan and actual costs, or based on commitment data.  Additionally, overhead may be applied to many orders simultaneously using a collective processing. 
    Use this transaction to apply actual overhead all orders for a plant or all plants.
    Thanks,
    Rau

  • Posting Actual Costs at Material Level

    Hi All
    For our standard costs we will have BOM Components, Activities from Routings and additive costs. We also have activated Material Ledger and will use it for Actual Costing, the objective being that each and every actual cost will be brought to the SKU level. For BOM components and activities that is no problem since it will be done through settlement.
    However for cost components that have additive costs how do we settle them to the material ledger? Do we need to do MR22 for difference between standard and actual? Is there a way to do this through a template allocation or some other allocation method?
    Thank you

    Hi
    Lets assume, you have Std cost of 100 USD involving Material + Labor and an additive cost of 10 USD entered manually from CK74N...
    During production order processing - You would issue material components and confirm Labor hrs... Say, this amounts to 120 USD as against the std cost of 100 USD...
    However, in prod orders, there will be nothing posted against the additive std cost of 10 USD... If you wish, you need to post it either through template allocation from some cost centers or use some assessment cycle or transfer manually from KB11N or use a costing sheet
    Regards
    Ajay M

  • Posting date wise PM order actual cost

    Hi friends ,
    I want a report where I can see the actual cost of PM orders , posting period wise :
    Say an order's basic start date =  26.7.2011
    material is reserved on the order on 29.7.2011 with planned cost Rs100 .
    Now reservation is issued with MIGO with posting date  2.8.2010
    Now I want a report where I can see this cost by posting period.
    Say if I enter 1.7.2011 to 31.7.2011 then cost should be zero .
    only cost should come when i will enter 8th month .
    One more point should be there the report should not consider controlling area's currency .
    Because our controlling area currency is USD and cost in our orders is in INR
    Regards
    AM

    S_ALR_87012993 
    Enter
    controlling area
    fiscal year
    from month
    to month
    Enter order or order group  or leave it blank
    Execute
    Double click the actual value you want to see
    A small screen - select report will appear
    Double click 
    Orders actual line items
    click change layout    select posting date

  • Actual Cost component split - Per PO

    Dear ML Experts,
    We have activated Material Ledger and Actual costing/ Actual cost component split in our implementation. The standard cost is based on delivery costs and there is no manufacturing involved. In order to test ML, we created some POs and did a GR and IR for those POs. When I look at the Material Price analysis on the Price Determination Structure View, I can see the Price differences per transaction (Goods receipt, Invoice receipt).
    But when I go to the Cost component View (Actual), I cannot drill down into the individual transactions. I am able to see the actual cost component split only at the summarized level across multiple transactions. I can see the category Purchase Order under Receipts, but I am unable to drill down to see the actual cost component split for the individual transactions (goods receipts, invoice receipts).  Did I miss anything on the configuration? The client wants to see the price differences per cost component per transaction and actual cost component split per transaction.
    Is it possible to view this information using standard configuration? Would I have to change the controlling level in order to achieve this?
    Can you please provide your advice?
    Thanks,
    Balram

    Hi Balram.
    If you have access to an IDES system, you can see a Cost Component split like this:
    As fas as I know, this is only for educational porpouses. In the standard System, its not recomended have the detail of the split per movement, due to the huge amount of data genereted. There is a Flag that control this, in a Txxx table (i dont have access to the system right now).
    If you really want this functionality, write SAP in the marketplace, and I guess their response is exactly what im saying.
    Arturo.

  • Selection of Costing Sheet in Production Order

    Hi friends,
    I have one query, details of which are as  follows.
    Costing sheet in Requirement Class - Blank
    This requirement class assigned to Requirement type which was derived in Sales order through Material master and hence Costing sheet in Sales order is blank.
    Costing Sheet in Valuation variant (Plan) is Z0010 which is assigned to Costing Variant (Plan). It was assigned to Order type.
    Costing sheet in Valuation variant (Actual) is Z0020 which is assigned to Costing variant (Actual). It was assigned to Order type.
    I have created a new Valuation variant T01 in which Costing sheet is blank. It was assigned to a Particular Plant.
    When i am creating the Production order with reference to the Sales order in that Particular plant, system is deriving the Costing sheet as per Valuation variant (Plan) which is common instead of picking from the plant specific valuation variant.
    So, its calculating overheads and is impacting our Goods receipt valuation (In this plant, GR Valuation is as per Plan cost of the Production order).
    I tried different combinations, and finally observed that it is picking the Costing sheet from the valuation variant (Plan) which is common and not Plant specific.
    Is this system behavior correct as per SAP Standard?
    Kindly advise on the same
    Regards
    Madhusekhar Gupta G

    Hi Madhu
    1. Production order gets coating sheet from the valuation variant assigned to order type
    2. The valuation variant that you assign to Plant is for standard cost estimate only
    3. For your case, create a new costing variant without costing sheet and assign the same to the order type for this plant
    You can assign different costing variant to the same order type per plant
    Br. Ajay M

  • Actual cost are not updating in prodcutcost collectors ( KKF6N) - Variances

    Hi SAP's
    We are facing the problem with the Variance calculation for product cost collectors.
    The issue is When we are calulating the Variances for prodcut cost collectors the actual costs are not ( For few materials of BOM) updating.
    Because of these the variances are showing high.....If I settele this variances to COPA, my copa report is will be going wrong.....
    Please help me to comeout of this problem.
    Thanks in Advance
    PrasadReddyS
    FICO Consulatnt

    Hi Anand
    Please add the budget profile at Plant maintenance order level no need to add any substitution rule
    budget should also be control at order level
    Thanks
    trinath 

Maybe you are looking for