Actual Cost Sheet - Controlling
Hi All,
My client is mfg API (active pharmaceutical ingredients) products, whereby in process of mfg, at every stage "Mother Liquior" comes out of the reactor (A residue which can be purified and used further for production).
Now since mother liquior is an output of the process in stage of mfg, its quantity in BOM is negative (e.g -200 Litres).
While taking cost estimate with costing variant (i.e actual cost sheet), even if material master contains price of the mother liquior, system throws error specifying "No price can be determined for Material XXXXXXX/batch/Plant".
Requesting you all to find a solution to this.
Regards,
Anktia
Hi Deva,
I have cheked the config for my costing variant for Actual Cost Sheet. The Priority given is:
1. Purchase Price
2. Moving Average Price
3. Standard Price.
Now even when SP is available in Material Master, it does not consider it and as MAP is not there, it throws the error "no price could be determined for material/batch XXXXXX"
Regards,
Ankita
Similar Messages
-
Actual Cost of Product with Price control "S"
Dear Gurus,
Is there any report available where we can know the Actual Costs of Materials with Price Control "S".
In the material master field the actual cost in the "Moving Price Tab" of the material with Price Control "S" is available, but is there any report available for plant level?
Thanks & Regards,
Amit Dhanurdhari.Hi Amit,
-- Under Standard Costing, you value your inventory at Standard Costs and any variances in Production Process will be settled to Price Difference Account. You will not be able to find out actual cost per unit. In Multi-level BOM scenario under Standard Costing (CO-PC), variances don't get rolled-up to the next level, only costs get rolled-up.
-- Under Actual Costing - Material Ledger, You will be able to find out the Actual Cost per Unit. Variances get rolled-up to the next level.
To explain difference between Standard Costing in CO-PC and Material Ledger briefly....
You have given Price Indicator as "S" in the material master of "X" material (semi finisher or finished) and you are doing Standard Cost Estimate for arriving at Standard Cost per tonne. Let's say, the Standard Cost per tonne is Rs.1000/-
Now, when you created production order for 10 tonnes and received output of 10 tonnes (GR). But the total cost incurred on that production order is Rs.1100/-. In this situation, actual cost per tonne is Rs.110.
But, because you are following Standard Costing, When you post GR against this Production Order, inventory will be posted at Standard cost only, i.e., Rs.1000/-. and the balance of Rs.100 will be posted to Price Difference Account. (and parallally the variance of Rs.100/-) will flow to COPA.
So, it is clear that, though, at Production Order level you can see the actual cost, at "material" level, you will not be able to see the actual cost per tonne.(as long as you are using only Product Costing and Standard Costing)
Alternatively, if you maintain Price Indicator as "V", you will able to get the Actual Cost per tonne at material level, but there will be no scope for establishing standard cost and comparison with actual thereof.
But, the same is possible if you are using Material Ledger (CO-ML). If Material Ledger is active, you will be maintaining "S" in the material master, still, the variances will be settled inventory and you will be able to get the actual cost per tonne. (bothe Standard cost estimate, actual cost per tonne will be possible).
Pls revert back for further explanation
Srikanth Munnaluri -
In which table we can find service entry sheet no to find the actual cost
In which table we can find service entry sheet no to find the actual cost of External service
Service code, Service description Quantity UOM, Vendor, CostHi,
Total Actual Material Cost - Sum up the total cost ENWRT against the AUFNR in the table RESB and display in the report
Total Actual External Service Cost - Provide the field AUFNR in the table EKKN and get the Purchasing document field EBELN & apply this field data in table EKPO get field NETPR and display in the out put
For link between operation & order - Selection criterion is the order number (Field AUFNR table AUFK). The content of field AUFPL has to be used afterwards as selection criterion in the table AFVC. The selection field in this table is again AUFPL and display the field LTXA1..
Kuber -
KSII, Can FI postings flow into Controlling actual cost splitting.
Can FI postings flow into Controlling actual cost splitting and actual price calculation. I am trying post FI documents(FB50,FB60,FB01) with cost elements, activity type, quantity and cost center combination. I am able to post a document and then I do all the KSS2, in KSII is not able to show me that posting. I need to know, is it possible to move from FI to CO in tcode KSII , if yes let me know i am missing something. and i am getting an error message
Message no. KP250
Diagnosis
The plan or actual activity for cost center , activity type is 0. However, costs were planned or posted in period(s) 2.Hi,
As you know, the system splits all activity-independent costs to the activities according to the following three step logic:
-split based on target costs
-if not possible split by splitting structure
-in the last step if the above two were not possible split by equivalence numbers set in transaction KP26
In your case, if there is no actual quantity for the cost center, then the system will split by equivalence number. Therefore please make sure, that the cost center has actual quantity.
Further information is also provided in note 772794.
regards
Waman -
0CO_PC_01 Cost Object Controlling: Plan/Actual Data
Hi Experts
I have a question regarding Cost Object Controlling: Plan/Actual Data (0CO_PC_01). I know nothing about the R/3 processes and tcodes behind this datasource.
For a given material and a given plant do I only get records with VTYPE(Value type for Reporting) 10, but I do not understand why - I need VTYPE = 70.
I therefore hope:
1. That somebody could provides input on why I only get VTYPE = 10 and how I get 70 instead.
2. That somebody can tell me the tcodes behind this datasource on the R/3 side.
Thanks and kind regards,
TorbenHi Mr. V.
Thanks a lot for the input.
The problem is that we have got VTYPE 30 (target) for some materials, but not for specific material A and we really do not understand why. Do you know how I can verify if the variance is present for the given material A in R/3?
Thanks and kind regards,
Torben
Edited by: Torben Pedersen on Apr 3, 2009 12:00 AM
Sorry, it is VTYPE 30 i need, not 70 as stated by mistake at first. -
Controlling of Plan & Actual Cost of Assets
Hi gurus
We want to monitor our Assets plan & actual cost . In other words. whenever Accounting document will create from Asset accounting. a Controlling document should be created . for monitoring Assets Plan & Actual Cost.
Please give Expert opnion. is this justified.
Thanks.Hi James
Your requirement is justified... but it does not work the same way as for revenue expenses
1. You need to create the Asset recon account as Cost Element (Category 90)
2. Assign a Statistical Internal Order in the Asset master and enter the Budget in it. (KO22) or Enter a Plan value in KPF6.. This would serve as the Plan expense of asset
3. When you receive the asset, it would also trigger a posting in the Internal Order... This would serve as the Actual expense on account of asset
Now, when you execute the report for Internal order, it would give you PLan Cost cost of Internal Order vs Actual Cost...
BR,Ajay M -
Costing sheet in control tab of production order
In OPL8 iam able to configure default cost accountings for production order type but why costing sheet is coming by default in production order costing section.
Is there anyway to hide that costing sheet (AUFK-KALSM) from display to the users without effecting any cost calculation in the background.
The purpose behind this is not to let users mess with costing sheet selection while creation. this is possible with screen variant but is there any standard settings for order type?
Thanks in advance.Dear Sprint,
No
In my understanding we do not not have any Std setting for archiving your requirement
Use screen variant or check for any exit
Regards
Madhu -
Plan cost & Actual cost in KKBC_ORD for CO Prdn Order
Dear Experts,
We are not able to findout the why difference is appearing during T code KKBC_ORD order analyse for Raw materials, please suggest wht may be the wrong thing in the order?
Before this i would like to brief you on the process.
Raw matls are created with "V" as price control. & Finished Goods as "S" control.& we create one BOM. Say example
My finished Goods will be 500555 code & Raw matl code will say 1001010 & 1002020.
My BOM will contain these raw matls with qty of 1kg each.
FG code 500555 of 2kg Bag
Items are 1001010 & 1002020 of 1kg each.
Here my mvng price are 2 & 4Rs for raw mtls 1001010 & 1002020 respectively.
In Material master we define overhead key as 10% to a Finished goods (500555) in Costing view.
1) Now i create a Base planning object T code KKE1 & I update the 10% as overhead cost & raw matls qtys as per BOM.At the end you can see the overall manufacture cost of the FGs in this case you will get for
FG 500555 about 6.6Rs. then save it.here it is done for 1bag only.
2) Create a CO PRDOUCTION ORDER T code KKF1 system will generate one number & save it. Now go to KKF4 add the base planning object name & enter the required qty say 10 bags...
You can see the COGM will now 66Rs for 10 bags as per the planning.
3)Goods issued to Order 261 with refc to BOM & Order number entred qty as 10. Sytem will calculates the qtys of raw mtals based on 10bags & save it.
4)Goods receipt done against CO PRDOUCTION ORDER (Finished goods 500555).
*5)KKBC_ORD i hav updated the CO PRDOUCTION ORDER & choosen cost trend. Here i am seeing a diffc in actual cost column & variance of 26%.but how it is possible*
Regards
TGI can think of a couple of areas where there may be differences.
First, your CO order is probably not getting any overhead costs. Your base planning object had 10% overhead built into it, but that is only for developing the preliminary cost estimate for the order. The allocation of actual overhead must occur through some other method (i.e. overhead costing sheet, activity allocation, or template allocation).
Second, the actual material costs assigned to the order will be based on the material's inventory valuation at the time they are issued to the order. Since you said the materials are valuated at weighted average cost, it is possible that their inventory valuation changed between the time the base planning object was created and the time they were issued to the order.
thanks, -
Hi Friends,
In Product costing i have two scenarios-- MAKE TO STOCK AND MAKE TO SALE ORDER.
For make to stock the costing variant will be PPC1
AND for make to sale order the costing variant will be PPC4
we can give different cost sheets for PPC1 AND PPC4
But in in cost object controlling for the costing variants PPP1 (Planing) AND PPP2 (Actual) we can give only one cost sheet which is used while creating production order.
How to provide different cost sheets(Mak to stock and Make to sale order) here in cost object controlling also?
Any ideas ? Full points will be awarded.
Regards
sivaYou are unable to attach separate costing sheets to PPC1 and PPC4 because the valuation variant in the two costing variants is the same. (based on the standard config that I can see)
SAP does not allow the valuation variant for a costing variant to be changed after creation. To get a different cost sheet requires a different valuation variant, which would require building a new costing variant - we did do that and named it ZPC4.
If you want the valuation different BY PLANT, go to the valuation variant tab of your costing variant and look for a selection "Valuation Variant/Plant" (in 5.0 this is a button in the upper left corner of the screen). Here you can make plant specific valuation variant configuration. We use this for manufacturing plants - all plants use ZPC2 costing variant for standard cost to be released, but each plant has their own costing sheet as defined in "Valuation Variant/Plant"
Just remember to test, test, test.
As to this question: In such case make to stock and make to order can not be done in the same Plant--Right? our make to order is for non-valuated stock, so all costs move to the sales at the standard value of the actual quantities used. Depending on what is added to make Cost of good sold, I don't know how you would get the "Actual" on to the manufacturing order so that it would settle to the sales order. - it is after all a manufacturing order. have you tried doing the COGS on the sales order instead of the mfg order?
Obviously this question is a bit out of my usual practice. Someone else may have experience with this. But one other thought to keep in mind with your costing variants - which costing/valuation variant is used to release standard cost for inventory purposes? To me that is the value that you want associated with production orders because mfg variances will generate from that cost.
Hope some of this is helpful
Althea -
Logic for cost sheet for Csost estimation
Hi all,
Can any one explain me what is the logic and how cost getting captured in the cost sheet.
when i run KKF6N...how does and from where does the system get the value and when i save the cost estimation how & where it goes and update....
If any one can provide me details along with some examples will be very much helpfull ....
Ur help is very much appreciated
Regards
SAP4MEHi,
You use overhead calculation to allocate overhead through percentage-based or quantity-based overhead rates. The basis for the allocation is the primary cost elements that you posted as overhead costs. In the manufacturing industry, for example, these are usually the labor and material costs.
To perform an overhead costing, you need to define control data during Customizing and include this in a Costing Sheet. The Costing Sheet combines all parts of the overhead costing and determines the rules for calculating the values to be posted. The Costing Sheet is comprised of a Calculation Base, Overhead Rate, and Credits. The Calculation Base defines the primary cost elements to which a particular overhead is to be applied. The Overhead Rate determines to what extent the percentage-based or quantity-based overhead rate should be applied to the direct costs. It also specifies under which conditions (dependencies) the overhead rate is to be applied. For example, you can calculate a defined overhead rate for each plant by specifying a plant dependency. The Credit specifies the credit object and the credit cost element. When overhead is applied to an order in the actual, another object is credited at the same time (such as a cost center or another order). You allocate the overhead using a special overhead secondary cost element (category 41).
You can apply overhead to both plan and actual costs, or based on commitment data. Additionally, overhead may be applied to many orders simultaneously using a collective processing.
Use this transaction to apply actual overhead all orders for a plant or all plants.
Thanks,
Rau -
Posting Actual Costs at Material Level
Hi All
For our standard costs we will have BOM Components, Activities from Routings and additive costs. We also have activated Material Ledger and will use it for Actual Costing, the objective being that each and every actual cost will be brought to the SKU level. For BOM components and activities that is no problem since it will be done through settlement.
However for cost components that have additive costs how do we settle them to the material ledger? Do we need to do MR22 for difference between standard and actual? Is there a way to do this through a template allocation or some other allocation method?
Thank youHi
Lets assume, you have Std cost of 100 USD involving Material + Labor and an additive cost of 10 USD entered manually from CK74N...
During production order processing - You would issue material components and confirm Labor hrs... Say, this amounts to 120 USD as against the std cost of 100 USD...
However, in prod orders, there will be nothing posted against the additive std cost of 10 USD... If you wish, you need to post it either through template allocation from some cost centers or use some assessment cycle or transfer manually from KB11N or use a costing sheet
Regards
Ajay M -
Posting date wise PM order actual cost
Hi friends ,
I want a report where I can see the actual cost of PM orders , posting period wise :
Say an order's basic start date = 26.7.2011
material is reserved on the order on 29.7.2011 with planned cost Rs100 .
Now reservation is issued with MIGO with posting date 2.8.2010
Now I want a report where I can see this cost by posting period.
Say if I enter 1.7.2011 to 31.7.2011 then cost should be zero .
only cost should come when i will enter 8th month .
One more point should be there the report should not consider controlling area's currency .
Because our controlling area currency is USD and cost in our orders is in INR
Regards
AMS_ALR_87012993
Enter
controlling area
fiscal year
from month
to month
Enter order or order group or leave it blank
Execute
Double click the actual value you want to see
A small screen - select report will appear
Double click
Orders actual line items
click change layout select posting date -
Actual Cost component split - Per PO
Dear ML Experts,
We have activated Material Ledger and Actual costing/ Actual cost component split in our implementation. The standard cost is based on delivery costs and there is no manufacturing involved. In order to test ML, we created some POs and did a GR and IR for those POs. When I look at the Material Price analysis on the Price Determination Structure View, I can see the Price differences per transaction (Goods receipt, Invoice receipt).
But when I go to the Cost component View (Actual), I cannot drill down into the individual transactions. I am able to see the actual cost component split only at the summarized level across multiple transactions. I can see the category Purchase Order under Receipts, but I am unable to drill down to see the actual cost component split for the individual transactions (goods receipts, invoice receipts). Did I miss anything on the configuration? The client wants to see the price differences per cost component per transaction and actual cost component split per transaction.
Is it possible to view this information using standard configuration? Would I have to change the controlling level in order to achieve this?
Can you please provide your advice?
Thanks,
BalramHi Balram.
If you have access to an IDES system, you can see a Cost Component split like this:
As fas as I know, this is only for educational porpouses. In the standard System, its not recomended have the detail of the split per movement, due to the huge amount of data genereted. There is a Flag that control this, in a Txxx table (i dont have access to the system right now).
If you really want this functionality, write SAP in the marketplace, and I guess their response is exactly what im saying.
Arturo. -
Selection of Costing Sheet in Production Order
Hi friends,
I have one query, details of which are as follows.
Costing sheet in Requirement Class - Blank
This requirement class assigned to Requirement type which was derived in Sales order through Material master and hence Costing sheet in Sales order is blank.
Costing Sheet in Valuation variant (Plan) is Z0010 which is assigned to Costing Variant (Plan). It was assigned to Order type.
Costing sheet in Valuation variant (Actual) is Z0020 which is assigned to Costing variant (Actual). It was assigned to Order type.
I have created a new Valuation variant T01 in which Costing sheet is blank. It was assigned to a Particular Plant.
When i am creating the Production order with reference to the Sales order in that Particular plant, system is deriving the Costing sheet as per Valuation variant (Plan) which is common instead of picking from the plant specific valuation variant.
So, its calculating overheads and is impacting our Goods receipt valuation (In this plant, GR Valuation is as per Plan cost of the Production order).
I tried different combinations, and finally observed that it is picking the Costing sheet from the valuation variant (Plan) which is common and not Plant specific.
Is this system behavior correct as per SAP Standard?
Kindly advise on the same
Regards
Madhusekhar Gupta GHi Madhu
1. Production order gets coating sheet from the valuation variant assigned to order type
2. The valuation variant that you assign to Plant is for standard cost estimate only
3. For your case, create a new costing variant without costing sheet and assign the same to the order type for this plant
You can assign different costing variant to the same order type per plant
Br. Ajay M -
Actual cost are not updating in prodcutcost collectors ( KKF6N) - Variances
Hi SAP's
We are facing the problem with the Variance calculation for product cost collectors.
The issue is When we are calulating the Variances for prodcut cost collectors the actual costs are not ( For few materials of BOM) updating.
Because of these the variances are showing high.....If I settele this variances to COPA, my copa report is will be going wrong.....
Please help me to comeout of this problem.
Thanks in Advance
PrasadReddyS
FICO ConsulatntHi Anand
Please add the budget profile at Plant maintenance order level no need to add any substitution rule
budget should also be control at order level
Thanks
trinath
Maybe you are looking for
-
Hi, I am interested in finding a solution for the following topic. We would like to send an email to an End-User who's Windows Account has been locked-out. Besides the fact there are measures in place to deal with the situation in general (Monitoring
-
I'm trying to buy a game using a gift card but the only options that come up are ones for credit cards. It says redeem giftcard but I have already done this, so when I try this option again it says that this gift card as already been redeemed which i
-
MultipartRequest java.io.IOException: Corrupt form data: premature ending
i try to upload a file using MultipartRequest i want to get the name of the file uploaded with html form and display it on jsp page (just for now to see if it works) in server.log i see Error creating file: java.io.IOException: Corrupt form data: pre
-
How do I stop the Menu audio from restarting with each selection?
I have modified an Encore (CS4) menu in Photoshop so that it has 10 animating video thumbnail buttons, a 1:30 music file, subpictures on the thumbnails to highlight what is selected, and I routed the buttons to go in the order I wanted. When I initi
-
I'm trying to upload another lyric video I made so I need settings that will give all three of video, picture, and sound. I just want good quality, best quality perferable. Please help!