Default PR Type when convert from Planned Order

Hi all,
How can I default my PR Type when convert from Planned Order after MRP run. This can done via MRP Group control but how to go about controlling via Planned Order profile?
Which planned object type and planned order profile to be used? assuming that i need my planned to be output at LA type and convert to NB1 PR type instead of the default NB PR type?
Thanks.
Regards,
Andrew

Hi,
The system determines the document type from the stettings u are making in "planned order Profile" in Customising for MRP. There u define the order type, the procurement key and the special procurement key and also the account assignment category. So based on the procurement key and the special procurement key maintained in the Marterial master, the document type is selected.
Production > Materials Requirement Planning > Procurement Proposals > Planned Order > Define order profile
Choose the planned order type - NB1 Within this you specify the P req doc type to be used.
Through MRP group and the different PR document type for MRP generated PR is possible only if you assign the document type to MRP group in the MRP configuration.
Please try and come back.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar
Edited by: R Brahmankar on Aug 28, 2008 10:54 AM

Similar Messages

  • Order type selection when converting from planned order to prod order

    Hello friends,
    I have one doubt.That when i am converting the planned order to the production order than from which default settings it takes the order type.
    As we can maintain the default order type in OPPQ , under conversion and in production scheduling profile also we maintain order type for make to stock, make to order, etc.
    So my question is to which setting the system gives the priority.
    Or they both are for different purpose.
    Thanking you guys in advance.

    Hi ,
       You can maintain the order type for conversion of planned order to production order in the T Code OPPE.
    Hope it will be clear.
    Regards,

  • Getting Error when convert the plan order into production order

    Hi Experts,
    When i converting the planorder into production order i am getting this error
    could you please suggest me hoew can i resolve this issue.
    Message no. CK466
    Diagnosis
    The system could not calculate a price for the internal activity with activity type 20000 of cost
    center 110TUP002 because none of the valuation strategies in valuation variant 006 was successful.
    System Response
    If the system issues a warning message or an information message, the costing item will be
    used in costing with a value of zero.
    If the system issues an error message, it sets the status "KF" (costed with errors).
    If the system issues a termination message, the cost estimate cannot be processed.
    Procedure
    1. Check the master data for activity type 20000 of cost center 110TUP002.
    2. If you have authorization for Customizing, check the valuation strategy for internal activities
    in valuation variant 006.
    Thanks&regards.
    Sateesh.C

    Hi,
    For the orders for which you get the error, note the dates, then check in KSBT, whether there is price maintained for that period.
    Eg: If the order has a start - 2nd Aug, 2010 & end 10th Aug, 2010, then check if price exists for period - 08, year - 2010
    Regards,
    Vivek
    Added
    If the values are maintained, then check the costing variants specified for the order type in OPL8 for plant - order type combination in cost accounting tab. Then in OPL1, check the details specified for the variants. If you're not sure on this, take help from your FI-Co colleague.

  • Order type while converting the planned order to prodcution order

    Hi All,
    While converting planned orders to production orders, it is always creating the production order with same order type. Can I change the order type?
    Is there any configuration settings for it??
    Thank you.
    Anil

    Anil,
    If you want to have different order types for different materials then you can define that in transaction OPPR for MRP Groups - Planned order conversion section and assign this MRP group to the relavant materials in Material Master MRP1 view.
    If you are looking at having different order types for a material based on MTS or MTO scenario, then please assign the different order types for the process in Production scheduling profile through transaction OPKP and then assign this profile to material master- work scheduling view.
    Regards,
    Prasobh

  • Material assigned to old PR when tried from Planned order to PR

    Hello Masters,
    I have a situation where my user is getting unprocessed MRP list using MD06. Then he would select a material and go to planned order. Then create purchase requisition form planned order.
    In general practice system should create a new purc req but its assigning the material to old (1998) purch req.
    Can any one give me the concepts assigning to old purchase requisition...
    The issue is occurring for last one month and its heating up...
    Really appreciate your valuable suggestions.
    Thanks,
    Ravi Shankar

    ANS to above Qs:
    Is this a requisition for the same material?
           Its for diff material.
    does SAP just add another item line to this old requisition?
           Yes, SAP adds another line item to existing old PR.
    Is there any commonality between the expected new requisition and this old one?
           Only common thing is that the newly next creating PR number is matching with old R2 system purch req.
    Is the old requisition still unprocessed?
           Old PR is processed.
    Can it be that the number range was reset while you still have requisitions in the table?
           I did not see number ranges reset in configs.
    Here is the clear pictureu2026
    Purchasing was on old SAP R2 till April 2007 and moved to SAP R3 after April.
    After April 2007, the PRs have a range which is matching with the range of SAP R2 PRs.
    When system automatically created PR numbers, there is a chance that the newly created PR number is already existing in SAP R2. In that case, R3 is picking up the matched R2 purch req and appending material to that old purch req.
    I feel there should be some config which will tell R3 system to pick next available number which does not match with R2 purch req numbers.
    Thanks Jurgen...
    Ravi Shankar

  • Problems with Custom Data Types when converting from TS 1.0 to 3.0.

    I am currently involved in the process of converting a test environment from TestStand 1.0, LabVIEW 5.1, and Windows NT to TestStand 3.0, LabVIEW 7.0, and Windows XP. We use a custom Operator Interface developed in LV. Based on the entered Model and Serial number, the appropriate Test Sequence is called. We also use a custom Process Model. The steps in the Test Sequence are either LV code modules or DLLs created in C++. We have LV SubVIs and C++ API functions that allow the developers of the test steps to add data to various Custom Data Types. For example, a developer may set up a test to add a note (Step.Result.Notes[x].String) when the test fails. Step.Result.Notes is a container for an array of strings. The attempt to set a note first attempts to use SetDimensions to redimension the array, then SetValString to set the value. These notes are added to the report. On the old system, everything worked fine. A note could be added to any result. On the new system, if a note is added to say the 5th result, but results 1-4 do not have a note, the test sequence ends and the Operator Interface returns to waiting for data entry (as if no test ever happened). No report is generated. The LabVIEW libraries have been modified to solve this problem by calling SetDimensions to incrementally increase the array size by one, and populating the unused TestStand array elements with an empty array of LabVIEW strings using the SetValString call . In other words, based on the previous example, if the user wants to set a note for the 5th result, the notes for results 1-4 must first be sent an empty array of strings. The report will only display the note for Result 5 (as desired). In addition to this being cumbersome, attempting to implement the same workaround in the C++ API has been unsuccessful because even though the note arrays for unwanted notes (1-4) is initialized with nothing, it is still displayed as a note (empty) on the report. If anybody knows what is wrong and what the solution is, it will be appreciated.

    Aaron,
    Thanks for your reply. I will attempt to clarify. I am working with a single step. The step calls a DLL. The DLL performs many 'checks' on the UUT (e.g. Model Number Check, Serial Number Check, Calibration Constants Check, etc.). Under the Type Palette - MyTypes.ini, we have a Step Type called TEST_DLL with a container in it called Results. In the Results container are a number of things, but I will only list the important ones:
    Notes (Array of Type 'Notes'; Type 'Notes' is a Custom Data Type (container, Type Definition)containing an array of strings called 'String')
    -Notes are generally set when on of the checks fails, otherwise no Note is set for the check.
    Val (Array of Type 'Val'; Type 'Val' is Custom Data Type (container, Type Definition) containing a Boolean called 'Boolean')
    -Val indicates whether the check passed of failed
    Pseudocode example:
    //Model Number Check
    check# = 0;
    resultBOOL = ModelNumberCheck();
    SetDimensions("Step.Result.Val", 0, "[0]", check#);
    SetValBoolean("Step.Result.Val[check#].Boolean", 0, resultBOOL);
    if(resultBOOL == FAIL)
    Note# = 0;
    SetDimensions("Step.Result.Notes", 0, "[0]", check#);
    SetDimensions(Step.Result.Notes[check#].String, 0, "[0]", Note#);
    SetValString("Step.Result.Notes[check#].String[Note#]", 0, "Model Number Check failed");
    Note# = 1;
    SetDimensions(Step.Result.Notes[check#].String, 0, "[0]", Note#);
    SetValString("Step.Result.Notes[check#].String[Note#]", 0, "Model Number = 1234");
    //Serial Number Check
    check# = 1;
    resultBOOL = SerialNumberCheck();
    SetDimensions("Step.Result.Val", 0, "[0]", check#);
    SetValBoolean("Step.Result.Val[check#].Boolean", 0, resultBOOL);
    if(resultBOOL == FAIL)
    Note# = 0;
    SetDimensions("Step.Result.Notes", 0, "[0]", check#);
    SetDimensions(Step.Result.Notes[check#].String, 0, "[0]", Note#);
    SetValString("Step.Result.Notes[check#].String[Note#]", 0, "Serial Number does not match expected");
    More Checks
    As you can see above, the "Step.Result.Val" array is redimensioned for every check. The "Step.Result.Notes" array is only redimensioned when a note needs to be added for a failing check. If the entire step executes and no check adds a note, the sequence is fine. If every check fails and therefore every check adds a note, the sequence is fine. However, if there are any gaps (e.g. check 0 adds a note, check 1 does not add a note, and check 2 tries to add a note), the sequence will stop. If I add blank notes for every check that would otherwise not have a note, the sequence completes, but the report shows the blank note.
    Also, the exact code that is causing these problems runs fine on our old systems (TestStand 1.0). I hope that I clarified the problem and thanks again for the help.

  • Routing not getting copied from planned order to production order

    Hi PP gurus,
    I have created  BOM & Routing for Fert material.Both are valid from 19.05.2008.
    When am converting planned order to production order today i.e. 20.05.2008 am getting a pop up ''no task list maintained for the material''.
    When i check in CA03 & CA02 for the same material , system gives pop up no task list maintained for the material .
    In CA01 , for the same material it shows routing is available & asks to create for 2nd counter.
    Pls. throw some light on this as am stucked .
    Thanx in advance n your solutions will be rewarded.
    Regards,
    Nagraj Vasmate

    Hi,
    This is in regards with your reply to this thread -
    Hi Nagraj
    You would have created this FERT material Routing in the same group counter of any other material. So while creating it will show the same group counter number of other material.
    Delete the existing FERT routing and recreate the Routing for FERT with different group counter.
    Now you convert from plan order to prod order. Then the system will allow.
    Hope this is clear.
    Regards
    J . Saravan
    I feel in my case it could be the reason why routings are not copied in production order, can you please explain this in details for me?

  • Set new Required Field for MD14 and MD15 for conver from Planned order to P

    Dear all,
    I would like to set new required field (Purchasing Organization)  in T-CODE MD14 and MD15 for convert from Planned Order to PR. What's should I do?
    Please help, I 'm new for MRP.
    Best Regards,
    Kate

    Hi Kate,
    You are not on the right track; MD14 and 15 will choose the PLANNED ORDER population for the conversion. In planned orders there's NO PURCHASING ORGANIZATION DATA (normally)!
    So even if you managed to put the field on the screen, it will not do anything that makes sense.

  • Field setting when collective conversion from planned order to PR

    Dear expert:
    Is there any way(except ABAP enhancement) to add the field "tracking number" in MD15 when I conduct collective conversion from planned order to PR. Seems in standard config this field in not included in this screen. I have set this field as a mandatory field, but even though when I conduct the conversion, this field still can not be displayed in the MD15 conversion screen.

    Hi,
    There are following T. Codes to convert Planned Order to PR;
    MD14 - Individual Conversion
    MD15 - Collective Conversion
    MDUM - In Background
    Also MD04
    User Exit is LMDZU001 - User exits in additional planning

  • Type reflowing when converting from CS2 to CS3

    We have just converted a lot of our machines over to CS3 but have noticed that some of the type is reflowing differently to our files in CS2, has anyone else come across this.
    I have just noticed that it is the kerning that is causing the problem, kerning is set to Auto in CS2 which has given me a value of 0 between two of the characters but in CS3 the value is now -150 (auto), font i am using is Guia Script Pro which is opentype.

    Hi ,
       You can maintain the order type for conversion of planned order to production order in the T Code OPPE.
    Hope it will be clear.
    Regards,

  • Order type for conversion of planned order

    Hi gurus,
    I have configured 6 different order types for PPPI and not maintained any default order type for conversion of planned order into process order. But when I am trying to convert planned order into process order by branching out from MD04 to COR7 via the popup window, default order type PI01 gets selected which  cannot be changed. However, if I am converting the planned order into process order directly through COR7, then choice of order type is available.
    Could you please tell me how to ensure choice of order type while branching from MD04 to COR7?
    Regards,
    Abhik

    Hi Datta
    The order type is selected as below
    First it will look for any scheduling profile is maintained. If so it will select default from the profile.
    Next if the profile is not there it will look for any scheduler is assigned in material master. Through the scheduler it will select the profile and default order order type.
    Next it will look in plant parameter. With conversion from plan order to prod order  order type
    Next it will look in MRP group conversion order type,  if you have mainted it in Material master.
    This is the sequence. Please check have to maintained any of these.
    Hope this is clear
    Regards
    J . Saravan

  • Automatic creation of Production order when PP/DS planned order is CIFed.

    Hi PP Gurus,
    The requirement is when PP/DS Planned order is created and CIFed to ECC R/3, Automatically system should create Production order for that planned order. In this case, is Trigger points will serve the purpose or need to adopt for some other way? I think since APO PP/DS is in sync with ECC R/3, something SAP might have given in this regard?
    Thanks & Regards,
    Abu Arbab

    Dear Abu,
    In SPRO PPDS global parameters and defaults, you can set "create transfer events from conversion indicator".
    After this the planned order is transferred to R/3 only when a conversion indicator is set against planned order.The conversion indicator can be set through RRP3 or RRP4.  You can put mass conversion indicator.
    When such planned order is transferred, it will automatically create production order.
    Regards,
    Nitin Thatte
    Edited by: Nitin Thatte on Apr 20, 2009 4:59 PM

  • Source determination not happening during PR creation from Planned order

    Hi Experts
    We have set up source determination and we have created a sourcelist of material and a vendor is fixed, there is a inforecord alos maintined,
    I am trying to convert a planned order from MD04 to a purchase requisition, the source is not being assigned for the PR, I am alos getting an  information saying that 'the material is defined for inhouse production'
    secondly if I click the 'Assign Source of Supply', then I am getting an error 'not possible to assign  a source of supply'.
    The material is a finished material 'FERT' with procurement key 'X' so in MRP an planned order gets generated for converting a PR or a production order.
    Note - I was doing this effectively in a differnt client without any proble.  I am unable to find what I am missing, please sugest.

    Nagaraj Chaganti wrote:
    Thank you everyone for the suggestions,  The issue is resolved by testing with a new material with tproper master data.  Basically the problem occured when some user created additional inforecord for the same P,Org hence there was no automatic source detemination happening.
    >
    > Bye with regards.
    a second info record may explain that AUTOMATIC source determination ddid not work but it does not explain the error messagees you described earlier.

  • No Account Assignment when I created Planned Order to Purchase Requisition

    Hi ,
    No Account Assignment when I created Planned Order to Purchase Requisition from Funds Management , where as If i change  ( eq : PR item qty is 10 , i just changed to 0 , enter then replace back that 10 ) any thing in the PR , Account Assingment is populated and list of accountin  documents are attached to PR.
    Please suggest me , what might be the problem .
    Thanks in adv

    Hi,
    a) When you convert the PldOrd into PurReq it disappears from table PLAF, it ceases to exist. There will be no PldOrd-reference in PurReq (you will not find such field in EBAN). (if you check field RSNUM in PLAF before converting the PldOrd and you check field RSNUM in EBAN after converting the PldOrd into PurReq, you wlll find the same number)
    b) It's not easy to say. You can check PLAF-PSTMP and PLAF-PUSER and compare these with data you get from trx STAD. But this is also not an exact methode since these field are in connection with the last date of change.
    Firming indicator cannot help also since you can remove it manually... - even though the PldOrd was changed manually, no firming indicator will be seen...
    (Of course, generally firming indicator helps if the user doesn't remove it intenionally)
    Regards,
    Csaba

  • Creating Production Order from Planned Order

    Hi,
    We are trying to use the BAPI 'BAPI_PRODORD_CREATE_FROM_PLORD' to create Prod. Orders. But it is failing with the message, 'Cannot be saved. Maintain serial no.' Now, the problem is there is no input parameter in this BAPI for providing the serial numbers. Our current Z program manually generates the Serial Numbers and uses BDC for 'CO48' to create the Prod. Order but has a horrible performance and for that reason we are trying to switch to BAPI instead).
    Now, the question is how best to achieve this objective: Use the BAPI to generate Prod. Orders from Planned orders with user-given serial numbers when there is no input option in the BAPI?
    I think of couple of options but not sure how good they are:
    1) Can we create/attach the serial numbers to the equipment/material first and then create production orders?
    2) Use implicit enhancement to add another parameter to BAPI and use it instead. This one seems little technically complicated because the BAPI itself calls tons of other programs (including CO48) to create Prod. Orders so the right place to insert the numbers might be difficult.
    Any clues how to solve this problem would be appreciated..
    Thank you

    Hi,
    REM manufacturing is simpler way to book the production.
    What is needed for REM is first question.
    1) REM profile
    2) Material on REM with this profile and REM tick
    3) Have normal BOM and routings/ rate routings and work center
    4) Define Production Version
    5) Define Product Cost Collector on which all costs are booked whenever you do your confirmation thro MFBF
    Having defined these master, once you run MRP you get planned order of PE type. It was earlier also callled as RS i.e Run Schedule.
    By using MFBF, backflushing transaction can book the production. REM is period based type of production booking unlike discrete where you make a production order of particular material for some dates, it is lot based production booking.
    Hope it is clear.
    Srini

Maybe you are looking for