Different APC value for different ledgers

Hi,
we maintain two ledgers, one for IFRS, the other for local accounting. Considering some type of assets, we need to post different APC values to the IFRS ledger and the local ledger. How can this be done?
thanks in advance,
Zbynek

Hi Arup,
Yes, absoutely - you can use different RD for the same VRF on different PEs. In fact, if you have chosen to use the PE_IP_Address:Customer format of the RD then logically, the same VRF on different PEs will have different RDs because the PE addresses themselves are different.
There is no obvious advantage or disadvantage to having the same or a different RD per the same VRF on different PEs. The RD is a tool that allows BGP to differentiate between identical prefixes from different VRFs on a single router. However, the value of RD has no influence on how the prefix will be assigned to a particular VRF on the destination PE. For this, route targets are always used.
There is one specific use of different RDs: Advertising multiple paths to a single multihomed VRF site. Because to BGP, the entire value of <RD><Prefix><Netmask> is used in the best path selection algorithm, if two PEs connected to the same VRF site used the same RD, destination PEs and route reflectors would choose and advertise only one of them (remember: BGP always selects and advertises only a single best path). With different RDs, destination PEs and route reflectors see formally different NLRIs, and they perform the best path selection for each of them individually even though the actual <Prefix><Netmask> is the same.
However, for simple VRF deployments, having a unique or identical RD on two PEs for the same VRF makes no significant difference.
I hope other friends here will add their own thoughts about this.
Best regards,
Peter

Similar Messages

Parallel accounting - different APC values for different ledgers

< MODERATOR: Please don't post in multiple forums. Message locked. Please review the [forum rules|https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki?path=/display/home/rulesofEngagement]>
Hi all,
I defined the following 3 depreciation areas:
01 - IFRS - posts in realtime / target ledger grp = 0L
30 - local - posts depreciation only / target ledger grp = Z1
60 - difference 30-01 - posts only APC directly / target ledger grp = Z1
0L contains leading ledger (IFRS)
Z1 contains parallel ledger (local)
Then I defined a new transaction type for acquisition (e.g. Z10) and limited it to depreciation area 01. This transaction type I wanted to use for acquisitions which are relevant only for IFRS ledger.
Now I post an $1000 invoice using transaction F-90 (acquisition with vendor). I select posting key 70, in the field Account I select an asset under construction and I choose the transaction type Z10.
After proceeding this step I would expect that the amount $1000 would be posted only in IFRS ledger. But it is not, it is posted in both ledgers.
If I want to run the transaction ASKB (APC values posting), I get an error message "Account 14001 in company code 0100 cannot be directly posted to". The account 14001 is the acquisition account for the AuC used when posting the invoice.
Why I get this message? How can I get the values posted correctly (i.e. only to IFRS ledger)?
Thanks for all ideas
Zbynek

Did you get a solution to your issue.?
Would you please mind sharing your solution ?
I am in a similar situation where we have area 01 as local Gapp and area 15 as IFRS.
we want to have 01 posted to leading and 15 to nonleading ledgers.
thanks.

Retirement whit same values for differente ledgers

Hi expert,
Here we have a few depreciation areas and a coupe of this area have different ledgers. When we run the transaction for retire an asset the value of leading ledger is moved to all others ledger. Is this a program error? I asked this because this problem not occurs when I run AFAB, for this case the program respect the different ledgers and post different values.
How can I fix this problem with retirement?
best regards,
Thanks in advence,
Egberto de M. Alves

Hi Paul,
thanks for your answer. But my issue is not with acquisition postings as I have the same posting for acquisitions in both the ledger but in case of retirement, my Profit and Loss on sale of asset should be different in both the ledgers(as the depreciation keys are different in both the ledgers/dep areas) which is not happening.
I tried ASKB, but i guess that is for acquisition posting.
Please let me know how retirement posting can be handled as in depreciation area setting retirement related posting is not mentioned.
Thanks in advance,
Regards,
Kavita

Posting for different APC values to different Depreciation Areas

Hi All,
I am trying to manage in ECC 6.0, different APC values for different depreciation areas, i.e. APC values differ from one dep area to another. I need to post the APC to GL only (i.e. for the 01 i.e. Book Depreciation area). For the remaining depreciation areas for the purposes of reporting I need to maintain different APC values.
One way to achieve this is by maintaining Parallel ledger. Is there any other way this can be achieved.
Thanks in advance
Krishna

Hi,
Use the trnasaction ABSO and clik in the button Dep. Area.
Now you can fill in the value by depreciation area. (when this is set up) use the Trans act type 100
Paul

Lowering Tax APC Values

Hi All,
We are implmenting AA for ECC 6.0 . I have a scenario where business wants the Tax change the APC values for tax area either they decrease or make it to zero
book is the same.I tried tr. code ABGL with credit memo but they dont want to touch book area .They just wanted to decrease the Tax values or reduce it to decrease.
Any thoughts.

APC value changes after one year after acquisition or two years
make it to zero or decrease the value.Scrap value is not visible in AS02 i saw we can enter scrap value or % in AS91.
Any Thoughts.
Thanks

Specify transfer of APC values

Hi all,
Should I use "Specify Transfer of APC Values" for Tax depreciation area and cost accounting depreciation.
Regards,
ram

What is exactly your issue?

Different APC values in Depn areas in AS91

Dear Friends,
Is it possible to enter asset APC values (different values) in each depreciation areas (Book, Federal, AMT and ACE) when we load thru AS91..?
Please help me.
Thanks,
Elan N.

Hi,
It is possible.
First set your relavant COD with transaction OAPL.
Now go to OABC and deselect check boxes of field Identical for dep areas AMT and ACE.
This will allow you to enter diff APC values to those areas.
If your problem get solved Please mark this question as answered by choosing solved problem option.
Thanks,
Srinu

Content Conversion- Same keyfield value for two different sub structure

Hi,
I have a scenario where the key field value for the 2 substructure of record structure is same.
MY XML structure is like this :
<documentName>
   <recordset>
<Header>
    <field-nameA1>
    <field-nameA2>
    <field-nameA3>
<ITM1>
   <field-nameB1>
   <field-nameB2>
   <field-nameB3>
<ROW1>
   <field-nameB1>
   <field-nameB2>
   <field-nameB3>
<ITM2>
   <field-nameB1>
   <field-nameB2>
   <field-nameB3>
<ROW2>
   <field-nameB1>
   <field-nameB2>
   <field-nameB3>
The sample text file is given below where line no. 3 and 5 are different substructure(For ROW1 and ROW2 respectively) with same keyfield value.
"HDR",399,"file",20050302,100642,3289
"ITM1",2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10
"ROW",3,4,5,6
"ITM2",2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10
"ROW",7,8,9,10
After content conversion I get a XML structure in which there is no ROW2 and all data within the fields of ROW2 are put under ROW1 as the key field values are identical.
In the records only the first field is constant (e.g. ROW).
How to handle such a scenario?
Regards
Satish Chauhan

Unless you can somehow expand the key, I don't know that this is possible. The key implies uniqueness - and in your case, unfortunately, it isn't. Is there any way to edit the structure to make it more unique for you? Do you have any control or ability to change that?
Maybe if you add unique keys in your mapping, you can strip them off with content conversion on the way out using the parameter keyFieldInStructure=ignore?

How to upload two different asset values for Book & Tax Depre in FA

Hello all
kindly let me know how to resolve a situation where we have different methods of calculating Depreciation. For Example SLM for Book Depreciation and Diminishing method for Tax Depreciation.
To calculate depreciation we use straight line method for book depreciation and diminishing value method for Tax depreciation. In this case, we have 2 different asset values to calculate book and tax depreciation.
Since SAP allows to upload only one asset value (Gross book value), I get correct book depreciation value but incorrect value for tax depreciation as the tax depreciation is calculated based on gross book value instead of net book value (gross book value less accumulated depreciation value).
For Eg
FOR THE FIRST YEAR
BOOK DEPRECIATION:
Asset Value = 1000
Depreciation Method : SLM
Depreciation rate is 10%
Depreciation Amount = 100
TAX DEPRECIATION:
Asset Value = 1000
Depreciation Method : DIMINISHING METHOD
Depreciation rate is 15%
Depreciation Amount = 150
FOR THE SECOND YEAR
BOOK DEPRECIATION:
Asset Value = 1000
Depreciation Method : SLM
Depreciation rate is 10%
Depreciation Amount = 100
TAX DEPRECIATION:
Asset Value = 850
Depreciation Method : DIMINISHING METHOD
Depreciation rate is 15%
Depreciation Amount = 127.5
KINDLY LET ME KNOW HOW TO UPLOAD THE PAST DATA WITH TWO DIFFERENT ASSET VALUES (IE 1000 & 850) FOR THE ABOVE.
Regards
Sushil Yadav

Hi K,
I'm having the same problem...did you find a solution yet?
Greets,
Martin.

Different stock value for accepted and rejected material in quality

Hi,
when we send the final product in quality ,some material has accepted and some material has rejected
But system is showing the value of both accepted and rejected same.
But we want that the value for both should be different.
How we can get it
Regards
Prem

It is not possible to valuate differently for accepted and rejected material.
The value for material in PO for total material. So it should be same value for both.
Regards
Ravi

How to create an array of ring with a different items/values for each

Hi All,
i want an array of text ring with different items and values for each text ring. Do you have other solution if it does not work?
thanks by advance

0utlaw wrote:
Hello Mnemo15,
The properties of elements in an array are shared across all controls or indicators in an array, so there is no way to specify unique selectable values for different text rings in an array. It sounds like what you are looking for is a cluster of ring controls, where each control can be modified independently.
Could you provide a more descriptive overview of the sort of behavior you are looking for? Are these ring elements populated at run time? Will the values be changed dynamically? Will the user interact with them directly?
Regards,
But the selection is not a property, it is a value... I just tried it and you can have different selections. Just not different items.
Bill
(Mid-Level minion.)
My support system ensures that I don't look totally incompetent.
Proud to say that I've progressed beyond knowing just enough to be dangerous. I now know enough to know that I have no clue about anything at all.

How to use different default parameter value for different report subscriptions

In ssrs is it possible to define different default parameter values for different subscriptions? In the following example I have a report which has two subscriptions with different start date and end date values:
Report name – Testsubscription.rdl
Subscription-1
Input parameter (default values):
start_date = first day of current Month
end_date = till date
Subscription-2
Input parameter (default values):
start_date = first day of current Quarter
end_date = till date
I know an alternative way of doing this would be to copy the rdl file with a different name but I am curious whether this can be done within a single report definition file. I am using SQL Server 2008 R2 Standard Edition.
Thanks!
spp

Hi sppdba,
As per my understanding, there is a report with two parameter: start_date and end_date, you want to configure subscription for the report, and set different default values for start date and end date. And you want to know if it is possible to achieve you
goal by using a single report definition file.
Since you are using SQL Server 2008 R2 Standard Edition, we need to achieve your goal by configuring two subscriptions for the report. For detail information, please refer to the following steps:
1. In design surface, right click start_date and open Parameter Properties dialog box.
2. In General pane, type Name and Prompt, set Data Type to Date/Time.
3. Click Available Values in left pane, select Specify Values.
4. Click Add button, in Label text box, type “First day of Current Month”, click (fx) button in Value section, then type the expression like below:
=DateSerial(Year(Now()), Month(Now()), 1)
5. Click Add button, in Label text box, type “First day of Current Quarter”, click (fx) button in Value section, then type the expression like below, then click OK.
=DateSerial(Year(Now()), (3*DatePart("q",Now()))-2, 1)
6. Right click end_date and open Parameter Properties dialog box.
7. In Available Values pane, select Specify Values.
8. Click Add button, in Label text box, type “Today”, click (fx) button in Value section, then type the expression =Today(), then click OK.
Now that the parameters are created, we need to configure subscription for the report. For detail information, please follow these steps:
1. Open Report Manager, and locate the report for which you want to create a new subscription.
2. Hover over the report, and click the drop-down arrow.
3. In the drop-down menu, click Manage. This opens the General properties page for the report.
4. Select the Subscriptions tab, and then click New Subscription.
5. Select the delivery extension and data source for the subscription.
6. Select a method of delivery, then choose report delivery options.
7. Specify conditions that cause the subscription to process and delivery to occur.
8. Set start_date to First day of Current Month, end_date to Today, then click OK.
9. Create a new subscription as step4 to 7, set start_date to First day of Current Quarter, end_date to Today, then click OK.
The following screenshots are for your reference:
For detail information about Creating Standard Subscriptions, please refer to the following document:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/data/ms156307(v=sql.105)
If you have any more questions, please feel free to ask.
Thanks,
Wendy Fu
If you have any feedback on our support, please click
here.

Passing different (multi-) values for parameters to drill-through report, based on clicked subtotal in main report

In Report Builder 3.0, I have made a main report in which the user can filter the underlying dataset using three parameters (all multi-value). The report shows totals grouped by these three parameters, as well as a grand total. What I want is to click
on a total, which then opens the drill-through report for the corresponding records. I have achieved this for the grand total; the action in the corresponding text box passes all selected values of the parameters to the drill-through report.
What I cannot figure out is how to make this work right when clicking on a subtotal. When I use the same expression as for the grand total, the same values for the parameters are passed, instead of the subset that apply to the corresponding text box in the
main report. I expected this to work, because Report Builder /does/ correctly calculate the SUMs for the different levels, even though the expressions are the same.
My question is: how do I pass different drill-through (multi-) values for parameters, corresponding to the respective subtotals in the main report?
(FYI: I am using Microsoft SQL Server 2008 R2 and Report Builder 3.0 .)

Hello Katherine,
Thanks once more for your quick reply.
I was aware of the textbox action "Go to report", and how to pass parameters in general. My question concerned how to determine the scope of the passed multi-value parameters (to the values that apply to the respective group/subtotal). The article you linked
to is informative, but not a solution to my problem.
A colleague of mine came up with a pragmatic solution: instead of trying to determine the scope of the parameter values, now I "look to the left in the results table". The two screenshots below should illustrate this. (Screenshots are in Dutch. Specific information
is pixelated.)
Unfortunately, I am not able to post images. Once my account is verified, I will edit them in. For now, I hope the text speaks for itself enough.
[Screenshot: Drill-through parameters - 01: Report Builder tablix with subtotals]
[Screenshot: Drill-through parameters - 02: Textbox properties (selected in screenshot 01) - Action - Go to report]
The first screenshot shows the tablix in the Report Builder. The second screenshot shows the properties of the textbox selected in the first.
Notice that I do not pass parameters for the first two columns, but the actual values. I only pass the parameter (containing /all/ user-selected values) for the third column. In the textbox below the selected one, I pass the actual values for the first column,
and parameters for the last two. In the textbox above the selected one, I pass the actual values for all three columns.
The only (cosmetic) flaw this approach has is that in the drill-through report, the list of selected parameters might show values that do not occur in the (corresponding part of the) results, and only for those parameters for which the main report passes (all
user-selected) parameter values, and not the actual values in the results. The results are correct, though.
If there is a way to directly determine the scope of multi-value parameters for passing to a drill-through report, I would still like know. But for now, this seems to work.

Customisation for PO Release (different Values for different Doc Types)

Dear Experts,
I need to configure for PO release procedure where in the Characteristics would be Plant (2 Plants), Doc Type (3 types - Standard PO, Imports PO & Capital PO) and Value (2 stage release: 0-100000 & >100000 INR for Std PO, 0-200000 & >200000 INR for Imports PO and 0-300000 & >300000 INR for Capital PO).
Please let me know where I shoud define the different Values for different Docs for the Release procedure to work properly.
Or let me know the entire procedure for achieving the same.
Regards,
MNP

Hi MNP,
You have to create different CLASSes in IMG with the possible combination of different characteristics,
EX. CLASS EKKO11 - Plant A, Doc type- Std PO, Value- 0-100000 & >100000 INR
CLASS EKKO22- Plant A, Doc type- Import PO, Value- 0-200000 & >200000 INR
CLASS EKKO33- Plant A, Doc type- Capital PO, Value- 0-300000 & >300000 INR and same for other plant
then assign these classes to the respective Release group.
regards,
Pravin

Different values for threshold array?

Hi, I am collecting measurements from 8 fluxmeters in an array of 8 elements and graph them in a multi line chart.
The fact is that some measurements return bad values due to bad transmission or bad reading from the (OLD) instrument. So, those wrong values are under or above the 50% of the real value (or the same, of the setpoint value).
Only a wrong value between 2 good values is collected (only a peak at time), so my goal will be:
if a > or < 50% of the real value (or the setpoint) is collected and both the value before and the value after this wrong reading are good I would replace the wrong with a correct value (say: with the previous or with the setpoint) in order to have a smooth chart shape.
I started to use threshold array vi but I need different threshold values for all 8 array positions because all 8 fluxmeters could have different setpoints.
Not able to solve...and probably I will need to collect at minimum 3 readings before filter wrong values, so I suppose I'd have to fill a 8x3 matrix (?)...

I don't think that the threshold array primitive is the right choice. This function interpolates the array and finds the fractional index. It assumes that the data has a slope. It doesn't sound like your data would meet this criteria.
You just need to find the "bad" data points and replace the value with a reasonable value. (maybe the average of the two data points on either side)
"There is a God shaped vacuum in the heart of every man which cannot be filled by any created thing, but only by God, the Creator, made known through Jesus." - Blaise Pascal

Different APC value for different ledgers

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for