** File to IDoc scenario - IDoc not created in target system

Hi friends,
We are doing File to IDoc scenario. We made required setting in both application as well as XI system. While test the scenario, the file is picked up and successfully processed in SXMB_MONI, but the inbound IDoc is not created in target system. What could be the problem?
We are using DEBMAS message type DEBMAS06 IDoc type. We checked the following.
1) SM59 - Connections are OK both application and XI system
2) IDX1 - In XI System, we have assigned SAP<R/3> port.
3) IDX2 - IDoc is imported.
4) In ID - Sender File - Business Service - Adapter-Specific Identifier - Logical System name is given.
5) In application system. - Partner Profile maintained correctly.
6) SM58 - There is no error.
So, what could be the reason ?
Kindly reply, friends,
Thanking you.
Kind Regards,
Jeg P.

Hi,
Check all the steps ..
File to IDOC
Do these configurations in R/3 and in XI...
SAP XI
1) RFC Destination (SM59)
a) Choose create.
b) Specify the name of the RFC destination
c) Select connection type as 3 and save
d) In the technical settings tab enter the details SAP SID/URL and system number#.
e) Enter the Gateway host as same details above SID/URL.
f) Gateway service is 3300+system number#.
g) In the Logon /Security tab, enter the client user & Password details of Destination system.
h) Test the connection and remote logon.
2) Create Port (IDX1)
a) Select create new button
b) Enter the port name as SAP+SID (The starting char should be SAP)
c) Enter the destination client.
d) Enter the RFC Destination created in SAP R/3 towards other system.
e) Save
3) Load Meta Data for IDOC (IDX2)
a) Create new
b) IDOC Message Type
c) Enter port created in IDX1.
SAP R/3
1) RFC Destination (SM59)
a) Choose create.
b) Specify the name of the RFC destination
c) Select connection type as 3 and save
d) In the technical settings tab enter the details SAP SID/URL and system number#.
e) Enter the Gateway host as same details above SID/URL.
f) Gateway service is 3300+system number#.
g) In the Logon /Security tab, enter the client user & Password details of Destination system.
h) Test the connection and remote logon.
2) Create Port (We21)
a) First Select Transactional RFC and then click create button
b) Enter the destination port name as SAP+SID (The starting char should be SAP)
c) Enter the destination client.
d) Enter the RFC Destination created in SAP R/3 towards other system.
e) Save
3) Create Partner Profile (WE20)
a) Create New
b) Create the Partner no. name as same the logical system name of the destination system.
c) Select Partner type LS
d) Enter details for Type: US/USER, Agent, and Lang.
e) Click on the + button to select the message type.
f) Select Partner no. and LS which ever create above.
g) Select Message type
h) Select Process code related to the Message type.
I) save.
Thanks,
Satya

Similar Messages

  • IDOC BOMMAT Is Not Received In Target System

    Dear Expert,
    I have one problem about ALE. I have distribution model between my system and partner system in other region. This distribution model is set up in my system to receive BOMMAT, MATMAS, BOMORD, DOCMAS, ECMMAS, and SERDAT. From my side, only sending the Audit(ALEAUD).
    Previosly the ALE link is was working properly.
    Now the problem that I have is, when my partner send set of IDOCs(BOMMAT, MATMAS, BOMORD, DOCMAS, ECMMAS, and SERDAT), my system received all messages except BOMMAT.
    I have been trying to search all possibilities in my system, which I can not find any solution for this.
    I can say it is not about authorization check since the authorization trace did not show any error.
    Thank you very much.

    Hello,
    SM58 from both system sender and receiver are empty and also all message types had been maintained properly in WE20.
    Thanks.

  • SAP Idocs -How to handle response from target system

    Hi,
    I am working on a scenario in which I will send Idocs asynchronously from SAP thro a SOAP adapter to a  webservice deployed on the target system.
    After the Idoc data is posted in the target system,the target system will send the acknowledgement for the receipt(basically response message).How to handle this scenario?
    SAP Idoc( outbound asynchronous)---> SAP XI3.0(soap adapter) ---> Target system(inbound synchronous)
    Do I need to go for BPM to handle this situation?
    Is there any alterantive to BPM.
    If any of the forum members who have worked on the similar scenario could help me in finding a better solution,I will be thankful to them.
    Thanks,
    Leo

    Hi Udo,
    Thanks for the info.My scenario is like this.
    SAP R/3 Idoc -> SAP XI 3.0 <-> Webservice in the target system.
    The webservice in the target system will receive the Idoc as a request messsage and send a response message synchronously.
    Since Idoc is sent asynchronously( I believe Idocs sent from SAP are always asynchronous),there is no Proxy waiting in SAP R/3 to receive the response message from the target system.
    If I go for BPM for the above scenario,will the BPM steps look like the following.
    1)Receive Idoc from SAP.
    2)Send Idoc sysnchronously to webservice
    3)Receive the response from the webservice synchronously.
    4.Post the response message to a proxy which can handle it further in SAP R/3.
    Please note that my knowledge in BPM is limited and correct me if I am wrong.
    Thanks in advance
    S.Banukumar

  • Requisition object not created in eRecruiting system

    Dear Experts,
    Please help.  My eRecruiting system in production is having error at the moment.  When recruiter approve Requsition form created by Manager (via MSS), the requisition object is not created in eRecruiting system.
    The step by step scenarion:
    1.  Manager create Requisition Form in MSS - using PDF form.
    2.  Recruiter receive the form in Universal Work List (UWL) in HR Portal
    3.  Recruiter approve the form
    4.  Requisition form should be updated in eRecrutiing system : eRecruiting -> Requisition -> Maintenance, However, the object is not created.
    Your help is appreciated!.
    -Rahidah-

    I have the same problem but the requisition is created in HRP5125 in SAP but does not reflect to portal any help on this will be appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Sheshu

  • Early watch alert task not created on satellite system via SDCCN

    The task about EWA is not created on satellite system via SDCCN.
    The RFC back was created on Solution Manager and the user assigned to it has the following profiles:
    S_CUS_CMP (SAP_S_CUS_CMP) Read data
    S_CMSREG (SAP_S_CSMREG) -> Central system repository data
    S_BDLSM_READ (SAP_S_BDLSM_READ) -> SDCCN data
    SAP_SV_FDB_NOTIF_BC_ADMIN -> Service Desk messages
    SAP_SUPPDESK_CREATE -> Service Desk messages
    I have checked the RFC authorizations and Connection nothing is wrong.
    Do you folks have any clue about that issue?
    tks,
    Re

    Hello,
    Not really much information to go on. The Maintenance package tasks is intended to schedule the Refresh defintion and services SDCCN tasks. So is this tasks scheduled? Is this taks gettign any errors/warnings in the logs?
    The EWA task is created when the refresh service task runs and gets a list of the serivce sessions that need to be
    populated.
    You can run a refresh services task to see if there are any sessions to pull. If ther are no sessions, it could be a problem in SMSY defintions for the system. if the system is not delared 100% correctly in SMSY  you will not get an EWA session populated.
    In DSWP in the SOlution is the EWA for the SID red flagged? If so this means the data still needs to be colelcted from the satellite/managed sysetm. Does the installation number of the SID match the one in SMSY? If not you willnot get any sessions.
    Is the refresh session actually using the *BACK RFC to the intended Solution Manager ssystem and is it defined as the master in SDCCN RFC destinations?
    If you go to SE37 and run TH_SERVER and specify the SM_SIDCLNTnnn_BACK RFC, does it pull the server list?
    If so your back RFC is functioning properly and a logon is successful.
    Are the service defintions being replaced successfully when the Maintenance Package runs? Are they replaced when an upgrade was done? It could be the service defintions need to be replaced.
    But really more information is needed. I have covered off just some of the issues possible.
    Regards,
    Paul

  • CUA roles sometimes do not match the target system

    Hi,
    We are using CUA on Solution manager to assign roles to our different systems.  Every now and then what is in CUA does not match the target System.
    I know that you can look at the idocs using WE05 and see what the root cause was, fix it and then re-assign the role.
    The problem is that when you assign the role using CUA, it doesn't warn you that the transmission failed on the target system.
    We just went live last week, so I am added and removing roles from many different users using SU01 and SU10 and I do not think it is a valuable use of time to sift through the idoc logs every time I make a change.  Especially, since most of the time it works.
    Is there a better way to monitor the Idoc logs?  Can you have it send a notification (email for example) when there is an error?  Is there a better process then WE05?
    Thank you in advance for the help!
    Neil

    Neil. It was a long time I played around with CUA. But I am remembering some transaction where you had the logs. Think it is SCUL.
    I searched saphelp and got the following hits for you:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/c1/db4063fd3111d5997a00508b6b8b11/frameset.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/cc/50b43be7492354e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
    Best of luck to you!
    Regards Fredrik

  • Term of payment does not exist in target system

    Hi Gurus,
    Scenario: Classic, Self service procurment.
    I made a shopping cart with my requirements.
    PR and PO created in the backend system.
    Posted the GR in SRM....and got the message of posted in the backend.
    Posted the invoice in the SRM and message creation completed and found that it has not been posted in the backend (checked the PO history).
    The message found in SRM SLG1...."Term of payment does not exist in target system" for that.
    Checked the vendor conditions and found that terms of payment exist in the backend system for that vendor.
    What could be the problem and how to resolve this issue?
    Thanks in advance
    SG
    Message was edited by:
            SRMGUY

    Hi,
    I am new to SRM.
    We have created new payment term in ECC and replicated to SRM using BBP_UPLOAD_PAYMENT_TERMS. We are able to see in table BBP_PAYTERM and BBP_PAYMENT_TEXT.
    But the non of the payment terms are reflecting into PO in SRM after this.
    I am able to see the payment term in backend in BBP_PD. I am getting the below warning message when I click on Check Button.
    'Term of payment does not exist in the target system'.
    What could be the problem and how to resolve it?
    Thanks in advance.
    Best Regards,
    Siddappa

  • Solution Import Failure Message: Cannot add a Root Component 'GUID' of type 29 because it is not in the target system

    Hi all,
    Please refer to the error:
    Root Components import: FAILURE
    [2015-04-10 17:04:48.126] Process: w3wp |Organization:0937f109-45df-e411-80cf-0050560100db |Thread:   43 |Category: Exception |User: ac011cf7-ad36-405b-91cf-2155ca15efb1 |Level: Error |ReqId: d3924c06-ad4b-4d5e-a204-70f8170016e1 | CrmException..ctor
     ilOffset = 0x30
    at CrmException..ctor(String formattedErrorMessage, Int32 errorCode, Object[] arguments)  ilOffset = 0x30
    at ImportRootComponentsHandler.GetSolutionRootsCollection(Boolean throwIfMissing, Boolean skipRibbonCustomization)  ilOffset = 0x209
    at ImportRootComponentsHandler.ImportItem()  ilOffset = 0x8
    at ImportHandler.Import()  ilOffset = 0x43
    at RootImportHandler.ImportAndUpdateProgress(ImportHandler ih)  ilOffset = 0x7
    at RootImportHandler.HandleNonMetadataHandlers(String[] ImportEntities, ImportHandler& ihForCurrentPath)  ilOffset = 0x33
    at RootImportHandler.RunImport(String[] ImportEntities)  ilOffset = 0x1D8
    at ImportXml.RunImport(String[] ImportEntities)  ilOffset = 0xE
    at ImportXml.RunImport()  ilOffset = 0x5BF
    at ImportXmlService.ImportSolutionSkipCapable(Boolean overwriteUnmanagedCustomizations, Boolean publishWorkflows, Byte[] customizationFile, Guid importJobId, Boolean convertToManaged, Boolean skipProductUpdateDependencies,
    ExecutionContext context)  ilOffset = 0x46
    at RuntimeMethodHandle.InvokeMethod(Object target, Object[] arguments, Signature sig, Boolean constructor)  ilOffset = 0xFFFFFFFF
    at RuntimeMethodInfo.UnsafeInvokeInternal(Object obj, Object[] parameters, Object[] arguments)  ilOffset = 0x25
    at RuntimeMethodInfo.Invoke(Object obj, BindingFlags invokeAttr, Binder binder, Object[] parameters, CultureInfo culture)  ilOffset = 0xCF
    at LogicalMethodInfo.Invoke(Object target, Object[] values)  ilOffset = 0x4F
    at InternalOperationPlugin.Execute(IServiceProvider serviceProvider)  ilOffset = 0x57
    at V5PluginProxyStep.ExecuteInternal(PipelineExecutionContext context)  ilOffset = 0x200
    at VersionedPluginProxyStepBase.Execute(PipelineExecutionContext context)  ilOffset = 0x65
    at Pipeline.Execute(PipelineExecutionContext context)  ilOffset = 0x65
    at MessageProcessor.Execute(PipelineExecutionContext context)  ilOffset = 0x1C5
    at InternalMessageDispatcher.Execute(PipelineExecutionContext context)  ilOffset = 0xE4
    at ExternalMessageDispatcher.ExecuteInternal(IInProcessOrganizationServiceFactory serviceFactory, IPlatformMessageDispatcherFactory dispatcherFactory, String messageName, String requestName, Int32 primaryObjectTypeCode,
    Int32 secondaryObjectTypeCode, ParameterCollection fields, CorrelationToken correlationToken, CallerOriginToken originToken, UserAuth userAuth, Guid callerId, Guid transactionContextId, Int32 invocationSource, Nullable`1 requestId, Version endpointVersion)
     ilOffset = 0x16E
    at OrganizationSdkServiceInternal.ExecuteRequest(OrganizationRequest request, CorrelationToken correlationToken, CallerOriginToken callerOriginToken, WebServiceType serviceType, UserAuth userAuth, Guid targetUserId,
    OrganizationContext context, Boolean returnResponse, Boolean checkAdminMode)  ilOffset = 0x1F1
    at OrganizationSdkServiceInternal.ExecuteRequest(OrganizationRequest request, CorrelationToken correlationToken, CallerOriginToken callerOriginToken, WebServiceType serviceType, Boolean checkAdminMode)  ilOffset
    = 0x2D
    at OrganizationSdkServiceInternal.Execute(OrganizationRequest request, CorrelationToken correlationToken, CallerOriginToken callerOriginToken, WebServiceType serviceType, Boolean checkAdminMode)  ilOffset = 0x26
    at InprocessServiceProxy.ExecuteCore(OrganizationRequest request)  ilOffset = 0x34
    at PlatformCommand.XrmExecuteInternal()  ilOffset = 0xF6
    at ImportSolutionCommand.Execute()  ilOffset = 0x20
    at DataSource.ImportSolution(Byte[] customizationFile, Boolean overwriteUnmanagedCustomizations, Boolean publishWorkflows, Guid importJobId, Boolean convertToManaged, Boolean skipProductUpdateDependencies, IOrganizationContext
    context)  ilOffset = 0x0
    at SolutionImportProcessPage.ImportSolution()  ilOffset = 0x123
    at SolutionImportProcessPage.ProcessRequestData()  ilOffset = 0x4A
    at SolutionImportProcessPage.ProcessAction(String action)  ilOffset = 0x92
    at AppUIPage.OnPreRender(EventArgs e)  ilOffset = 0xD
    at Control.PreRenderRecursiveInternal()  ilOffset = 0x54
    at Page.ProcessRequestMain(Boolean includeStagesBeforeAsyncPoint, Boolean includeStagesAfterAsyncPoint)  ilOffset = 0x6D3
    at Page.ProcessRequest(Boolean includeStagesBeforeAsyncPoint, Boolean includeStagesAfterAsyncPoint)  ilOffset = 0x3C
    at Page.ProcessRequest()  ilOffset = 0x14
    at Page.ProcessRequest(HttpContext context)  ilOffset = 0x33
    at CallHandlerExecutionStep.System.Web.HttpApplication.IExecutionStep.Execute()  ilOffset = 0x18D
    at HttpApplication.ExecuteStep(IExecutionStep step, Boolean& completedSynchronously)  ilOffset = 0x15
    at ApplicationStepManager.ResumeSteps(Exception error)  ilOffset = 0x10A
    at HttpApplication.System.Web.IHttpAsyncHandler.BeginProcessRequest(HttpContext context, AsyncCallback cb, Object extraData)  ilOffset = 0x5C
    at HttpRuntime.ProcessRequestInternal(HttpWorkerRequest wr)  ilOffset = 0x16A
    at ISAPIRuntime.ProcessRequest(IntPtr ecb, Int32 iWRType)  ilOffset = 0x4B
    >Crm Exception: Message: Cannot add a Root Component 0ffbcde4-61c1-4355-aa89-aa1d7b2b8792 of type 29 because it is not in the target system., ErrorCode: -2147188705
    [2015-04-10 17:04:48.126] Process: w3wp |Organization:0937f109-45df-e411-80cf-0050560100db |Thread:   43 |Category: Platform.Sql |User: ac011cf7-ad36-405b-91cf-2155ca15efb1 |Level: Info |ReqId: d3924c06-ad4b-4d5e-a204-70f8170016e1 | BusinessProcessObject.ExecuteNonQuery
     ilOffset = 0x28
    I am getting this coming up in the error log when I attempt to import an unmanaged solution.
    After searching on google Type 29 refers to a workflow.
    I go into the source system and query the database by the GUID and discover that it is actually a Business Process Flow called 'Phone to Case Process'. 
    I do not have this process in my target system as I deleted it.
    Looks like this is one of the out of the box ones. I don't think we we have changed this one much.
    What does this mean and what should I be looking for??
    Anyway how do I remove this offending process from the unmanaged solution xml file and attempt to re-import it? 
    It doesn't look like I can generate the solution again without the offending workflow/process..

    I managed to resolve this issue after looking at this thread:
    https://social.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/fddff17f-1cca-4d33-a666-60c08ad76b0c/crm-2011-import-failure?forum=crmdevelopment
    Just modify both solution and customizations xml by searching for the guid and removing the root component

  • File to IDoc scenario-CREMAS not getting posted

    Hi Experts,
    i am doing a file to idoc scenario in which i am giving the xml file from MDM ,consisting of Vendor Master data and posting the address and the general data into the ADRMAS and CREMAS idocs into the R/3 system.
    The problem that i am facing is that the ARMAS is getting posted correctly but the CREMAS is getting posted with the red signal,status 51.It says "Not authorized to change the Vendor Centrally."
    Can anyone please tell me what is the reason and the solution for this problem?
    Is this a data error or XI error?
    Thanks in advance,
    Shweta.

    Hi Shweta
    Status 51, 52 means Posting error 
    Please check wheteher all the configuration has been done or not
    SM59-rfc destination
    IDX1-port
    IDX2-load metadata
    we05-IDoc status records
    BD54-Create Partner Number
    We20-Create Partner Profile
    WE19-Testing IDoc Processing
    After That check the solution it is due to Authorization
    File to idoc - IDX5 Error
    Regards
    Abhishek Mahajan
    *Please reward points if helpful**

  • File to idoc scenario . how to create logical system

    logical system asking user authorization what should i do.
    what should be logical for whic we should degine partner profiles
    apoclnt800 or xi7clnt001

    Hi,
    The partner profile to be maintained in we20 (in backend systems -ECC/CRM etc) should be based on logical system for the sender.
    For ex: Src (File) -> PI -> Tgt(ECC)
    In SLD you have created Technical System(TS) and Business System(say BS) for Src. Also a Logical System name (Say LSNAME) is associated with BS.
    In ECC, goto tcode - sale, create a logical system of name LSNAME. Now goto we20 and create a partner profile of name LSNAME. Provide the message type of Idoc in the required place.
    Souvik

  • File to IDoc Scenario: Idoc Status 50

    Hello,
    I have a problem in doing a File to IDoc Scenario with a simple XML file mapped to IDoc "CREMAS.CREMAS03".  In the beginning, I got a status 56:"IDoc with errors added".  Then I added a logical system (LS name of my sender)manually in "Display IMG";however, it didn't work.  So I simply changed the logical system name of my sender to XI_00_800 which already exists in R/3.  I tried the scenario again, then I got the status 50:"IDoc added".  Looked like the IDoc still hadn't been correctly inserted as a record.  May I ask what other steps or configurations do I need to do to get this scenario to work?  Thank you.

    Steve,
    <i>Moreover, I didn't create any partner profile. The "XI_00_800" partner profile is in the system all along. Should I create a whole new partner profile and point that to my sender business system?</i>
    You need not create it once again as it already exists. Normally , ALE  configurations on an R3 system are the responsibiltis of the Functional Team. For instance , on our projects we are never given access to the End r3 systems and the Partner profile are created by the F'nal team itself.
    Like I mentioned, ask your F'nal team why you are getting this issue. From XI side , there is nothing more you need to do.
    Regards,
    Bhavesh

  • Scenario Message not created

    Hi,
      I am doing File to IDOC scenario. The source file
    adaptor  is showing "Functioning" in "CC Monitoring"..
    But in Message Monitoring the Message is not created.?
    thx
    Mukharji.

    Hi Mukharji,
    Use this link and check the log of your FILE adapter.
    http://<host>:5<nn>00/AdapterFramework/monitor/adaptermonitor.jsp
    Mickael

  • Classic Scenario PO not creating, only PR

    Hi,
    I'm using SRM 5.0, in classic scenario to R/3 4.6C. My Shopping Carts to R/3 are complete, but is not creating a PO. It creates a PR. If i run, ME57, assign and process, PR is already assigned a Fixed vendor, and PO is created without any further data being added. (Vendor, price, etc)
    I'm confident my number ranges and Doc Type settings are correct.
    In SRM customising, my 'Define Objects in BE Sys, has vaild P.Group, Cat Id, R/3 Source sys, Always external and PO if item data complete'.
    When I trace RFC, RSRFCTRC, it is calling BAPI_REQUISITION_CREATE. Not BAPI_PO_CREATE1. Vendor master, set to auto create PO, not using material masters. Mat group and Vendor replicated from R/3 to SRM. Tax is calculated in R/3.
    Any help appreciated. Is there a FM in SRM to test why its not creating a PO?
    regards Adam

    Hi
    Couple of reasons might be possible ->
    1) Try de-activating all the Custom BADI Implementations using SE19 Transaction (name starting with Y or Z) in SRM System for the time being, and then try out again.
    Seems to be some BADI - BBP_TARGET_OBJECTS
                                 BBP_TARGET_OBJTYPE might be over-riding the back-end documents creation.
    2) Incase above step, does not help, Try creating a PO or PR directly into R/3 system (using ME21N or ME51N Transactions with the Document typeused in SRM), with the same data that is passed in the RFC call (you traced earlier) then see, what is happening in that case ? 
    Do let me know.
    Regards
    - Atul

  • Manual entries of TDS/TCS deduction not creating Challans in system

    Hi All,
    We are to pass the entries of TCS (tax collected at source) deduction from sales invoice through FI module. Since it is not possible to deduct the TCS from sales invoice automatically without SD module, we have decided to post the TCS deduction entries manually. But when we are posting these TCS entries manually system is not creating challans for these TCS entries.
    Please guide me whether sustem will not create challans for manually decucted TDS / TCS entries?
    Thanks in advance
    Sonal

    Hi,
    tcs is not supported totally. u can deduct tcs from customer. for this in wht config setting u can activate wht for customer also from the path given below
    SAP Customizing Implementation Guide > Financial Accounting (New) > Withholding Tax > Extended Withholding Tax > Company Code > Assign Withholding Tax Types to Company Codes
    Warm Regards

  • CUA - Users not created in Central System

    Hi -  Just put in CUA into a Solution Manager 4.0 client - and have the following issue.
    After performing SCUG - the users are brought into the central system BUT not created into the central system.
    For example:
    Child system is CLNT100
    Parent system is CLNT200
    In CUA - if I search on the user - I can see it exists in CLNT100, but no entry is created in CLNT200.
    This is an issue as I can't use SU10 in CUA - to do mass changes as the users don't exist in this client.
    I am pretty experienced with CUA - but have not seen this before - is there some new settitng that I need to make to create the users in the CUA client when performing SCUG?
    Thanks

    Hi - you only need to perform SCUG in the central system.
    I have brought all the users accross from each child system.
    I think I may have incorrectly analysed the error.
    What I am trying to do is use SU10 in the Central system to make changes on users in the child systems.  Issue is that none of the users that are in the child system only show up in SU10.
    I therefore think that this is an issue with SU10 in CUA parent - as it is only picking up uses if they exist in this CUA parent client (i.e. not if they only exist in the child systems)
    Is there any way to change the behaviour of SU10?

Maybe you are looking for

  • After updating to iOS 6.1.5 on my iPod Touch 4th Gen, Some of my songs are skipping to the next song after 30 seconds of play...

    After updating to iOS 6.1.5 on my iPod Touch 4th Gen, some of my songs are skipping to the next song after 30 seconds even though the iPod appears to be playing the current song. Some of my songs are mp3 files that have been playing fine for years...

  • Online redo log files being removed physically

    Grid Infra version: 11.2.0.4 RDBMS Version: 11.2.0.4 Although this is a RAC DB, this is not a RAC-specific question. Hence posting it here. Few months back, I remember issuing a command similair to below (DROP LOGFILE GROUP ...) and the redo log file

  • USB Keyboard not working after running Monolingual

    Okay, I'm not a Mac person and should have known that I was going to mess up my mother's iMac, but here it is - In an attempt to improve the mac's performance I performed all of the actions described in the following article: 11 Ways to Optimize your

  • Client server exchange information

    My prog reads some ini files, adjusts them to key/values and present the user pages with actual values. The user is then ready to change the values and when done I write a 2nd file with updated values. The machine keeps on checking for my files, when

  • Urgent help in va01 user exit

    va01 userexit_check_vbap. an idoc is coming from edi . i need to read idoc and depending on condition of field value which is in idoc . i need to pass a error log to some transation how to read a idoc which is coming form edi any sample code is help