Manual entries of TDS/TCS deduction not creating Challans in system

Hi All,
We are to pass the entries of TCS (tax collected at source) deduction from sales invoice through FI module. Since it is not possible to deduct the TCS from sales invoice automatically without SD module, we have decided to post the TCS deduction entries manually. But when we are posting these TCS entries manually system is not creating challans for these TCS entries.
Please guide me whether sustem will not create challans for manually decucted TDS / TCS entries?
Thanks in advance
Sonal

Hi,
tcs is not supported totally. u can deduct tcs from customer. for this in wht config setting u can activate wht for customer also from the path given below
SAP Customizing Implementation Guide > Financial Accounting (New) > Withholding Tax > Extended Withholding Tax > Company Code > Assign Withholding Tax Types to Company Codes
Warm Regards

Similar Messages

** File to IDoc scenario - IDoc not created in target system

Hi friends,
We are doing File to IDoc scenario. We made required setting in both application as well as XI system. While test the scenario, the file is picked up and successfully processed in SXMB_MONI, but the inbound IDoc is not created in target system. What could be the problem?
We are using DEBMAS message type DEBMAS06 IDoc type. We checked the following.
1) SM59 - Connections are OK both application and XI system
2) IDX1 - In XI System, we have assigned SAP<R/3> port.
3) IDX2 - IDoc is imported.
4) In ID - Sender File - Business Service - Adapter-Specific Identifier - Logical System name is given.
5) In application system. - Partner Profile maintained correctly.
6) SM58 - There is no error.
So, what could be the reason ?
Kindly reply, friends,
Thanking you.
Kind Regards,
Jeg P.

Hi,
Check all the steps ..
File to IDOC
Do these configurations in R/3 and in XI...
SAP XI
1) RFC Destination (SM59)
a) Choose create.
b) Specify the name of the RFC destination
c) Select connection type as 3 and save
d) In the technical settings tab enter the details SAP SID/URL and system number#.
e) Enter the Gateway host as same details above SID/URL.
f) Gateway service is 3300+system number#.
g) In the Logon /Security tab, enter the client user & Password details of Destination system.
h) Test the connection and remote logon.
2) Create Port (IDX1)
a) Select create new button
b) Enter the port name as SAP+SID (The starting char should be SAP)
c) Enter the destination client.
d) Enter the RFC Destination created in SAP R/3 towards other system.
e) Save
3) Load Meta Data for IDOC (IDX2)
a) Create new
b) IDOC Message Type
c) Enter port created in IDX1.
SAP R/3
1) RFC Destination (SM59)
a) Choose create.
b) Specify the name of the RFC destination
c) Select connection type as 3 and save
d) In the technical settings tab enter the details SAP SID/URL and system number#.
e) Enter the Gateway host as same details above SID/URL.
f) Gateway service is 3300+system number#.
g) In the Logon /Security tab, enter the client user & Password details of Destination system.
h) Test the connection and remote logon.
2) Create Port (We21)
a) First Select Transactional RFC and then click create button
b) Enter the destination port name as SAP+SID (The starting char should be SAP)
c) Enter the destination client.
d) Enter the RFC Destination created in SAP R/3 towards other system.
e) Save
3) Create Partner Profile (WE20)
a) Create New
b) Create the Partner no. name as same the logical system name of the destination system.
c) Select Partner type LS
d) Enter details for Type: US/USER, Agent, and Lang.
e) Click on the + button to select the message type.
f) Select Partner no. and LS which ever create above.
g) Select Message type
h) Select Process code related to the Message type.
I) save.
Thanks,
Satya

Requisition object not created in eRecruiting system

Dear Experts,
Please help. My eRecruiting system in production is having error at the moment. When recruiter approve Requsition form created by Manager (via MSS), the requisition object is not created in eRecruiting system.
The step by step scenarion:
1. Manager create Requisition Form in MSS - using PDF form.
2. Recruiter receive the form in Universal Work List (UWL) in HR Portal
3. Recruiter approve the form
4. Requisition form should be updated in eRecrutiing system : eRecruiting -> Requisition -> Maintenance, However, the object is not created.
Your help is appreciated!.
-Rahidah-

I have the same problem but the requisition is created in HRP5125 in SAP but does not reflect to portal any help on this will be appreciated.
Thanks,
Sheshu

Early watch alert task not created on satellite system via SDCCN

The task about EWA is not created on satellite system via SDCCN.
The RFC back was created on Solution Manager and the user assigned to it has the following profiles:
S_CUS_CMP (SAP_S_CUS_CMP) Read data
S_CMSREG (SAP_S_CSMREG) -> Central system repository data
S_BDLSM_READ (SAP_S_BDLSM_READ) -> SDCCN data
SAP_SV_FDB_NOTIF_BC_ADMIN -> Service Desk messages
SAP_SUPPDESK_CREATE -> Service Desk messages
I have checked the RFC authorizations and Connection nothing is wrong.
Do you folks have any clue about that issue?
tks,
Re

Hello,
Not really much information to go on. The Maintenance package tasks is intended to schedule the Refresh defintion and services SDCCN tasks. So is this tasks scheduled? Is this taks gettign any errors/warnings in the logs?
The EWA task is created when the refresh service task runs and gets a list of the serivce sessions that need to be
populated.
You can run a refresh services task to see if there are any sessions to pull. If ther are no sessions, it could be a problem in SMSY defintions for the system. if the system is not delared 100% correctly in SMSY you will not get an EWA session populated.
In DSWP in the SOlution is the EWA for the SID red flagged? If so this means the data still needs to be colelcted from the satellite/managed sysetm. Does the installation number of the SID match the one in SMSY? If not you willnot get any sessions.
Is the refresh session actually using the *BACK RFC to the intended Solution Manager ssystem and is it defined as the master in SDCCN RFC destinations?
If you go to SE37 and run TH_SERVER and specify the SM_SIDCLNTnnn_BACK RFC, does it pull the server list?
If so your back RFC is functioning properly and a logon is successful.
Are the service defintions being replaced successfully when the Maintenance Package runs? Are they replaced when an upgrade was done? It could be the service defintions need to be replaced.
But really more information is needed. I have covered off just some of the issues possible.
Regards,
Paul

CUA - Users not created in Central System

Hi - Just put in CUA into a Solution Manager 4.0 client - and have the following issue.
After performing SCUG - the users are brought into the central system BUT not created into the central system.
For example:
Child system is CLNT100
Parent system is CLNT200
In CUA - if I search on the user - I can see it exists in CLNT100, but no entry is created in CLNT200.
This is an issue as I can't use SU10 in CUA - to do mass changes as the users don't exist in this client.
I am pretty experienced with CUA - but have not seen this before - is there some new settitng that I need to make to create the users in the CUA client when performing SCUG?
Thanks

Hi - you only need to perform SCUG in the central system.
I have brought all the users accross from each child system.
I think I may have incorrectly analysed the error.
What I am trying to do is use SU10 in the Central system to make changes on users in the child systems. Issue is that none of the users that are in the child system only show up in SU10.
I therefore think that this is an issue with SU10 in CUA parent - as it is only picking up uses if they exist in this CUA parent client (i.e. not if they only exist in the child systems)
Is there any way to change the behaviour of SU10?

RFC not created in receiver system

Hi,
FIile-rfc received in receiver system until yesterday.now the RFC not reaching to receiver system.They are no changes and no change in RFC structure.
all the ques are clear and RFC connectin to the receiver system is alo fine and CC monitoring is also green and in the audit log everything is sucessful.sxmb?moni messages are sucessful.
please let me know where i can check ...
Regards,
hyma

Did you see any logs in receiver RFC channel?
Check the receiver service for interface in moni- SOAP header-Main document.
Also check if any conditions are specified in receiver determination.

Bank manual entry the Group number is not displayed

Hi Friends,
Bank concepts T code FF68 screen in the group field I mention *. And posted the entire one. After that I went to OVERVIE
option and selected my bank. Here the issue is *if u mention GROUP field as a *. System automatically given the number*. But
here system not given any error.
So please anybody help me here.
Regards,
G G REDDY
Edited by: sachinreddy on Mar 8, 2011 12:52 PM

Dear Sachin,
Since is freely definable field you can enter what ever naming convention you want to give.
First make a convention what naming you should give to that group.
Then enter accordingly

Sapdata3 has been not created after Sap Neatweaver 7.3

Hi Gurus,
I have done the installation for SAP Netweaver 7.3 Java stack with distributed option with oracle database .
However file system created is sapdata1,sapdata2 , and sapdata4 has been created but sapdata3 is not created .
can any one susggest.
Regards,
Jeetendra

Hi Jeetendra,
Check whether you system is up and running ?
If yes, then sapdata3 is a folder created under /oracle/SID or /oracle based on your file system structure.
As right mentioned SAP installer will not create any file system. If file system /oracle/SID/sapdata3 is not available, SAP installer will create a folder sapdata3 under /oracle/SID and respective data files will be created under the same.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Deepak Kori

Planning File Entry not created

Hi,
I have a list of materials with MRP type PD and P3 for which there is no planning file entries exists. I am getting the following msg in MD21,
NO PLANNING FILE ENTRY EXISTS FOR THIS SELECTION
I have the option of creating planning file entries manually, but i want to find out the reason for not creating planning file entry.
What other parameters and configuration settings i need to check..? Should the BOM and routing mandatory for a material to create planning file entries?
Pls. clarify.
Thanks in advance,
Sabitha

Hi,
When you create materials via LSMW, just before you start the LSMW, there is a check box for Create Planning File entries, i guess this checkbox was not ticked & hence no planning file entries.
To double confirm, check if all the materials which you created via this LSMW have planning file entries, if it does not, it should answer your query.
To create planning file entry, refer to my initial posting.
Regards,
Vivek

How to make a form not create a second entry

I'm using the PDF entry for a form. Very cool. But if a user submits it, then adds more data and submits again it creates two entries. How can I 'key' the form so it only updates the same entry?

Sorry, we do not support this feature at this time.
If your form as a unique idenfier fields like an Email field or a First Name and a Last Name fields then sort by that column and look at the latest submission by a same user and delete other row manually. Each submission has a "Time Submitted" column in the response table (View Responses Tab).
Gen

Text Entry Captions not created

Using Adobe Captivate 5.0 - Training mode is not creating the Text Captions for Text Entry Boxes, even though selected in the Training/Recording settings. Creates Text Entry box, but no Text Caption. Really want this to work when recording SAP simulations, but doesn't even seem to work when recording internet browser or MS Oulook either. Any ideas? Thanks.

Hello again
Perhaps it will help if I simply describe how Captivate usually works. There are several ways to record. There is "Full Motion" (FMR) where everything is recorded just like a movie. Not the best way of working bit is possible. In FMR no captions or anything of the sort is added during the recording process, but you may add them later if you like.
Then there is the "slide by slide" capture mode. Each click of the mouse generally results in a screen capture. But this mode of capturing has four variations.
* Demonstration
* Training Simulation
* Assessment Simulation
* Custom
Demonstration mode provides text captions for activity. Click this or that. Also, highlight boxes are added along with tracking mouse movement.
Both of the simulation modes will ignore text captions, mouse tracking and highlight boxes. Instead, these modes simply add Click Boxes and Text Entry Boxes to allow "simulation" or interacting with the Captivate. These objects offer "Feedback" captions to indicate Correct or Incorrect actions.
From what you have described, you want to enable "Custom" recording mode where you choose the mix of elements you get.
However, NONE of these modes will analyze what is happening and describe it to the user. Instead, they may or may not recognize what you are clicking on in order to create captions. You might see funky names like "Click the TechnicalNameForControl" control.
Does this help any?
Cheers... Rick
Helpful and Handy Links
Captivate Wish Form/Bug Reporting Form
Adobe Certified Captivate Training
SorcerStone Blog
Captivate eBooks

Clearing of manual entries in GR/IR not happening

Hi All,
I've made two manual entries in the GR/IR account. The second entry being the reverse of the first, so basically they cancel out each other. But as these arent linked to a PO, the line items arent being cleared by F.13
I tried manual clearing FB1s and F-04 but it picks up only one line item (the reverse line item i.e. credit item). And so I cant even manually clear these line items.
Can you please provide a solution?
Regards,
Tejas

Hi Tejas,
Please have a look at Note : 178487, maybe it helps... it talks about several points like:
1. In the master data of the G/L accounts, flag "Line item display" or "Open item management" was set for accounts which do not require line items.
2. Update of FI data from the upstream modules is too detailed.
3. Problems during clearing
4. Data is kept too long in the system.
But I am not very sure whether it answers your exact scenario.
Coming to the point of clearing open line items 'easy way', as Janani mentioned, there seems to be no easy ways for clearing the open line items. As I understand, the primary reason for this could be because we are dealing with business sensitive data and the open line items are infact open because of some valid reason, and should not be closed using short cuts. What I mean is... a line item could be (or should be) open if there is some business transaction yet to be completed or it is closed if the transaction is completed and its the job of the user who is responsible for the transaction to make sure that the line item is cleared when the transaction is complete.
In my experience, as you and Janani have experienced, it is normal that we see a lot of documents not archivable because of open items. In my previous experiences, we have handled it this way:
1. Run the Archive run in test mode (prefarably with 'only incorrect docs in log')
2. Give the log to the financial users/module owners to analyze the log (you can use FB99 also to see whether individual documents are archivable or not)
3. Come up with a strategy to close the open items. Distribute the log to respective users (maybe according to doc type) and come out with a time schedule to close these items. It will definately take some time.. say weeks, to analyze each item and close it.
4. Come up with a strategy so that so many documents are not kept open (unnecessarily) in the furture
5. FI owners should have a relook whether the accounts managed under open item management are really required in OIM.
In summary, no short cuts :(.
Hope this helps,
Naveen

Accounting entry against Excise invoice not created for Service Tax sales

Dear all,
I am facing one problem related to accounting entry against excise invoice not created, for service tax sales scenario in SEZ plant.
Accounting entry against billing document is generated,which contains revenue account-Debit entry,service tax 10% --Debit entry,ECS-Service tax 2% --Debit entry, SECess Service Tax 1% --Debit entry & Sundry Debtors (Reco) - Domestic(Customer receivable reconciallation) account-Credit entry.
But after generating excise invoice, accouning entries not generated for clearing of Cenvat suspense entry(i.e.service tax 10% ,ECS-Service tax 2% , SECess Service Tax 1%) which is generated during billing document.
Plz. suggest step by step guideline to resolve this issue.
Thanks & Regards,
Mukesh Pardeshi

Hi ReazuddinMD,
thanks for your reply and support...I checked all the entries/accounts maintained correct.. but the Accounting entrys against Excise invoice not created..
Now i am geeting error as below at the time of saving Excise invoice,
No account is specified in item 0000000001
Message no. F5670
Diagnosis
No account was specified for account type "S" in item "0000000001" of the FI/CO document.
System Response
The Financial Accounting program cannot process the document.
Procedure
A system error has probably occurred in the application you called up. Check the data transferred to item "0000000001" of the FI/CO document.

Planning File entry not created automatically

Hi,
What could be the reasons for not creating planning file entry automatically for a material..? Its MRP type is P3.
How to check whether all the material in a particular plant is considered for MRP or not..?
Does the transaction MDRE - Consistency Check have any role in this..?
Pls. clarify.
TIA
Sabitha

Dear Sabitha,
In MD21, there are no entries for that material.
It doesn't mean that planning File entry is not maintain for this material.
If non of the tabs of NChge Pln,NChge P Hor, etc are activate then it means there is no req. for this material either with in planning horizon or out planning horizon.
If planning file entry is not maintain for any material then you will get below msg in md21 at the time of execution,
No planning file entry exists for this selection
Message no. 61140
Kindly check and revert back,
Regards,
Dhaval

MIGO_GR fill delivery note field from manual entry in bill of lading

I have to fill header field delivery note from manual entry in bill of lading in tcode MIGO_GR for mopvement type 101.
I searched for the exits and BADI's but header fields are not in changing parameters.
Has anybody worked on automatically filling the delivery note field in MIGO_GR transaction from bill of lading field or a value from database?

Hi You can use MB_MIGO_BADI Badi.
Thanks,
Anmol.

Manual entries of TDS/TCS deduction not creating Challans in system

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for