LIne items Diff

Dear all,
In a Single Sales Order haveing 10 Line items......
In that 10 line items.....4 internal,4 External(Vendor),2 items are 3rd party items...
I need to do in a single invoice...but in above scenario 8 items are delivery releated billing and 2 items are Order releated items....
But i need to do in a single invoice,how can v???????
Thanks in advnace
Regads
luckky

Hello,
You may not be able to do the same, because the delivery relevent line items will be billed by billing type F2 and the order relevent by billing type F1. For both of these documents the copying control settings are also different.
The copying control for F2 is from a delivery document and for F1 it will be from an order document.
Prase

Similar Messages

APP-Line Item in diff. currency

Dear all,
There is a line item in vendor records, posted in diff. currency (other than company code corrency).
While APP (F110) system not paying that amount, showing the following message:
ayment method selection for items due now to the amount of SGD 1.000,00
items with currency SGD, pmnt method - items total is > 0
none of the payment methods defined can be used for these items
ormation re. vendor XXXXXX / paying company code XXXX ...
payment not possible because of reported error
Guide me, wht is the procedure to go further.
FBZP - Currencies allowed INR given.
Regards
Partha

Thank you.
Now its paying in other currency also, after maintaining the required currency and maintaing the bank determaination for the particular currency.
One more clarity is required. That - I want to clear the Spl GL item also. Means business want to net of the cash advances (Spl GL Ind. A). So, I maintained in FBZP
Sp. G/L transactions to be paid A.
But I am not able to cleare these items at f110.
Message: ...none of the payment methods defined can be used for these items
Please clear my problem.
Thank you
partha

S_ALR_87013620 Diff in Total & Line Item Level

Hi All ,
I'm running report S_ALR_87013620 for a particular cost center. Now the problem is that when i see Actual value is 30059.19 but if i double click and select "Cost Centers: Actual Line Items" system display value 43.283,65
I also check value through t-code KSB1 iam getting value 43283.65. means actual vale is 43283.65 then why system displaying 30059.19 in total actual column
And when i exectute same Report using diffrent user id then it showing correct value in total as well as in line item
can any one help me to find out the root cause of this problem
Regards
Prakash Sharma

Hi Mishi,
check object authorization , in my case few object are missing .. i just take the screen shot of su53 and send to S&A team and issue is resolved
Regards
Prakash Sharma

Service Entry sheet creation - Using a diffent contract diff from line item

Hi,
Here is the scenario...
I have a services purchase order referring to contract and its service item with services ( service masters) attached to it.
And the PO item is a limit item with some limits maintained on the limits tab, but contract reference is specified at the limits level it is only at the line item level.
System version : ECC 6.0
Lets say PO number : 123456789
Lets say contract number and item is : 2323232323 item 10 ( Account assignment U )
My supplier is : 111111111
Now I am creating the Service Entry sheet and I am trying to add the services ( services selection button) I get a pop up to search for services by certain selection criteria and one of them is purch document ( remember it doesn't pre-populate and grey out the purch doc field with that the contract number from the item level) and now I can select any service contract that belongs to any supplier and select the services from it and complete my SES.
So lets say the contract from which I chose the service is : 3232323232
And the supplier on the contract is 2222222222
Is this a valid scenario or not?
Has any body ran into this situation before?
Hope I was clear in explaining my scenario....
Thx,
Krishna.

Hi Krishna,
the External Services Management distinguishes between planned and unplanned services.
In case you have ONLY limits, no planned services in the PO item, it does not matter if you have entered a contract number into the PO item - in this case this contract will be not a real reference for your services.
If you have entered limit values only as overalllimit and expected value and you did not enter a contract limit on the contract limit tab, then you will not have a special contract reference on unplanned level neither.
In this case it is NOT an error when you start the entry sheet creation and you can select services from other contracts or purchase orders against your limit values in the PO into the entry sheet. The system does NOT check for a different vendor when you select services from other documents than the contract which you have specified in your PO item, because it is NOT a real reference - nor on services level as you have only limits in your PO item, nor on limit level since you have NOT entered a contract limit into your PO item.
In order to understand this process please study the unplanned scenario and contract reference scenarios.
Regards,
Edit

Totals differ from line items

Hi,
We are running report S_ALR_87013620 for a particular cost centre. When the total on the front screen for commitments is more than the total of the line items it displays.
Any idea's???

Resolved using RKACOR04,

Diff. G/L Transaction Figures Vs Line Item.

Hi Guys,
Can any body explain diffrenece between "General Ledger: Transaction Figures" and "General Ledger: Line Item"
I need to prepare P & L reporting which data source will be appropriate for this.
Your help is highy appriciated.
thanks
Ajay

HI,
For P&L the most appropriate Source will be the line item(GL 4) datasource as it Amount field does not have the Cumulative Balance. This is what is required for a P&L Account. Where as in case of balance Sheet accounts, you need cumulative balance, which is present in General Ledger: Transaction Figures (GL10 / GL6 depending on the version of R/3)
Regards,
Gaurav

Diff. Transaction Figures Vs Line Item.

Hi Guys,
Can any body explain diffrenece between "General Ledger: Transaction Figures" and "General Ledger: Line Item"
I need to prepare P & L reporting which category will be appropriate for this.
Your help is highy appriciated.
thanks
Ajay

Hi,
Edited by: santosh kumar on Sep 8, 2009 12:27 PM

1 Invoice / 2 Line Items / Different Item Categories & diff exchgn rte

hi,
there are 2 line items in my invoice and both have different item categories. one item cat (ZFIX) have exchange rate setting in copy control "PricingExchRate type" as A and other (ZFLT) have "C". now exchange rate are maintained in OB08 and are determined correctly in my billing documnet. but whenever i post the billing document to FI, exchange rate for "Billing Date" is determined for both line items. however the expected result was that exchange rate for 1st line item should have been determined as per sales order date( as copied in billing documnet).
hope my queery is clear. any comments to resolve the issue?
Edited by: Robert on Mar 4, 2011 8:29 AM

I had a similar problem before. The FX rate for the FI document is determined based on the invoice posting date, whatever you select in the copycontrol. The copy control setting is only for the SD internal conversion of i.e. pricing condition currency into document currency.
The only choice in the Sap standard is to manipulate FI FX Rate my knowledge to set the Rate in the sales order (billing document tab in header or item, Field Exchange rate for FI postings).
Hope this helps to clear your issue.
Regards
TDI

Splitting sales ord line items to diff deliveries based on max line items

Hi,
I'm trying to split sales order line items to different deliveries based on the max line items on Sales Organization ( TVKO-MAXBI ) . I activated a new routing (copying standard 001 ) but an error is happening
Item 000200: delivery split due to conflicting header data (ZUKRL: M106 <-> M1061)
However the split does not work as expected. Does anyone have any ideas ?
Pls help me
The code is:
data: ITEMNO        LIKE TVKO-MAXBI,
      BILLNO        LIKE TVKO-MAXBI.
*}   INSERT
FORM DATEN_KOPIEREN_601.
*{   INSERT         MTDK905083                                        1
LIKP-VKORG = CVBAK-VKORG.
LIKP-AUTLF = CVBAK-AUTLF.
LIKP-VSBED = CVBAK-VSBED.
LIKP-FKARV = TVAK-FKARV.
LIKP-TRAGR = MAAPV-TRAGR.
Fill field ZUKRL with combination criteria
LIKP-ZUKRL(2)      = CVBAK-VTWEG.
LIKP-ZUKRL+2(2)    = CVBAK-SPART.
    IF NOT TVKO-MAXBI IS INITIAL.
      IF ITEMNO < TVKO-MAXBI.
        ITEMNO = ITEMNO + 1.
      else.
        LIKP-ZUKRL+4(2) = BILLNO + 1.
        ITEMNO = 1.
      endif.
    endif.
LIKP-STAFO = CVBAK-STAFO.
LIKP-STWAE = CVBAK-STWAE.
MOVE CVBAK-KKBER TO LIKP-KKBER.
MOVE CVBAK-KNKLI TO LIKP-KNKLI.
MOVE CVBAK-KKBER TO LIKP-KKBER.
MOVE CVBAK-GRUPP TO LIKP-GRUPP.
MOVE CVBAK-SBGRP TO LIKP-SBGRP.
MOVE CVBAK-CMWAE TO LIKP-CMWAE.
MOVE CVBAK-WAERK TO LIKP-WAERK.                      "46C/note 184914
MOVE CVBAK-CTLPC TO LIKP-CTLPC.
IF LIKP-LFART = TVAK-KORLI.
    LIKP-KLIEF = CHARX.
ENDIF.
MOVE CVBAK-LIFSK TO LIKP-LIFSK.                           "45B
Pick-up sheet number in delivery order processing is external dlv. no.
IF CVBAK-VBKLT EQ VBKLT_AUSL_AUFT OR
     CVBAK-VBKLT EQ VBKLT_AUSL_AUFT_KORR.
    MOVE CVBAK-BSTNK TO LIKP-LIFEX.
ENDIF.
Consignment issue by service agent is external delivery number
IF CVBAK-VBKLT EQ VBKLT_EDL_ENTN OR
     CVBAK-VBKLT EQ VBKLT_EDL_ENTN_KORR.
    MOVE CVBAK-BSTNK TO LIKP-LIFEX.
ENDIF.
*}   INSERT
ENDFORM.

hi friend i solved the problem.. was a mistake on my source... I send u the code to help u in advanced... thanks for your time
data: ITEMNO        LIKE TVKO-MAXBI,
      BILLNO        LIKE TVKO-MAXBI.
*}   INSERT
FORM DATEN_KOPIEREN_601.
*{   INSERT         MTDK905083                                        1
LIKP-VKORG = CVBAK-VKORG.
LIKP-AUTLF = CVBAK-AUTLF.
LIKP-VSBED = CVBAK-VSBED.
LIKP-FKARV = TVAK-FKARV.
LIKP-TRAGR = MAAPV-TRAGR.
Fill field ZUKRL with combination criteria
LIKP-ZUKRL(2)      = CVBAK-VTWEG.
LIKP-ZUKRL+2(2)    = CVBAK-SPART.
    IF NOT TVKO-MAXBI IS INITIAL.
      IF ITEMNO le TVKO-MAXBI.
        ITEMNO = ITEMNO + 1.
      else.
        BILLNO = BILLNO + 1.
        ITEMNO = 1.
      endif.
    endif.
LIKP-ZUKRL+4(3) = BILLNO.
LIKP-STAFO = CVBAK-STAFO.
LIKP-STWAE = CVBAK-STWAE.
MOVE CVBAK-KKBER TO LIKP-KKBER.
MOVE CVBAK-KNKLI TO LIKP-KNKLI.
MOVE CVBAK-KKBER TO LIKP-KKBER.
MOVE CVBAK-GRUPP TO LIKP-GRUPP.
MOVE CVBAK-SBGRP TO LIKP-SBGRP.
MOVE CVBAK-CMWAE TO LIKP-CMWAE.
MOVE CVBAK-WAERK TO LIKP-WAERK.                      "46C/note 184914
MOVE CVBAK-CTLPC TO LIKP-CTLPC.
IF LIKP-LFART = TVAK-KORLI.
    LIKP-KLIEF = CHARX.
ENDIF.
MOVE CVBAK-LIFSK TO LIKP-LIFSK.                           "45B
Pick-up sheet number in delivery order processing is external dlv. no.
IF CVBAK-VBKLT EQ VBKLT_AUSL_AUFT OR
     CVBAK-VBKLT EQ VBKLT_AUSL_AUFT_KORR.
    MOVE CVBAK-BSTNK TO LIKP-LIFEX.
ENDIF.
Consignment issue by service agent is external delivery number
IF CVBAK-VBKLT EQ VBKLT_EDL_ENTN OR
     CVBAK-VBKLT EQ VBKLT_EDL_ENTN_KORR.
    MOVE CVBAK-BSTNK TO LIKP-LIFEX.
ENDIF.

Splitting sales ord line items to diff deliveries based on sched ln date

Hi,
We are trying to split sales order line items to different deliveries based on the schedule line date. I have copied routine FV50C001( vofm -> data transfer -> deliveries -> routine 1)into a custom routine and added the schedule line date xvbep-edatu to the split criteria likp-zukrl. However the split does not work as expected. Does anyone have any ideas ?
Regards.

Hi Aravind,
u said u ve copied the routine into a customised one..but did u chk whether ur customised routine is getting called from the transcation or not?? the routine has to be assigned in config so tbat it is triggered appropriately.. try putting a BP in ur routine n doin the transaction...
Regards

Few line items are not coming at the time of creation of delivery

Dear Experts,
When the user creating the delivery few line items are not picking in the delivery document
the following checks i verified,
Stock is available
shpping condition is differ from sold to party and sales document
Plants are same for all the line items
why the few line items are not coming in the delivery document creation,
please help me to sort out this issue
Thanks and Best Regards,
Muralidharan S

Hi,
Check below points.
Point 1:
When you create a delivery document, you create it for a Shipping Point.
So whatever the line that came in to one delivery has determined same shipping point that you entered in VL01N screen.
Others got a different shipping point and that's why it didn't come to the same delivery document.
Shipping point determined based on below criteria
- Shipping Condition - From customer master
- Loading Group - Material
- Plant - Delivery Plant of the sales order line item
You assign a proffered shipping point for above combination in configuration.
If that combination is not find, those line items are not going in to the delivery.
You can check the log of the delivery document for more information as well.
Point 2:
Check the line item Requested delivery date and the "Selection Date" you entered in the VL01N screen.
Al Requested delivery dates has to be on or before the "Selection Date" you entered in the VL01N screen.
Those line items which has a date more than that will dropped in the delivery.
Best regards,
Anupa

Asset Creation in PR and PO and MIGO as a single Line item with "N" qty

Hi All,
In Purchase requestion ME51N
Now we are creating "n" number of assets ( All are same item but "s.no" will vary) with "n" number of line item.
Instead of this I have to enhance to create only one line item( For same item) with "n" quantity.
for the ASSET account Assignment we have to create Asset(Temp no) for the each item/quantity(if the same item).
as well as if they are going to create a PO with ref to PR they have to see all the "n" number of asset no.
In MIGO creation for each asset we have to assign S.No and Asset Tag.
How enhance the functionality in PR,PO and MIGO as well as in Invoice.
Is it any User Exit/BADI is available for PR/POand MIGO to show all the "n" number of assets for a single line item.
Kindly help me to give details to proceed further.
Thanks in advance.
sharma

Hi Sharma,
What i understand from your question is, you want to create a single line item in PR and PO. But the qty would be > 1.
Each single qty would have its own asset number in account asssignment tab of item details of PR & PO.
This is what you are expecting...Right???????????????
Then this is possible with certain limitations.
While creating PR, enter only one item with more qty.
In item details section, in account assignment tab, on top left corner, there will be a button called Multiple account assignments.
Click on it, then it looks like a table, where you can enter more than one line. (each line will have its own asset no)
And choose option Distribute on qty basis for field Distribution.
So that you can enter 1 qty for each line. ( Ex: if you created one line item in the item level with 10 qty, you need to maintain 10 line here, each qith 1 qty and diff asset no).
The only limitation to this is, the GRN would be treated as non valueted. So when you make GRN there wwould not be any accounting doc. ( means no use of GR/IR clearing account as like normal for POs)
when you prepare MIRO, all the assets will be capitalised and vendor credited.
But in case if you receive partial invoice, then you have choose manually in MIRO. which asset is ot be capitalised.
After entering the PO number in MIRO, there will be one line will be appeared with full qty. in the same line, move till the end of line, there you will have one button called Account assignments.
Choose and go there, here you can choose which individual asset line to be considired.
This will resolve your issue.
Thanks,
Srinu
SRBORIGI_MULTIPLE ACCOUNT ASSIGNMENTS

Profit center line item report

Hello All,
A sales order is created with reference to a service order, now when I see Profit center line items, the function area available in Service order is differ from the function area displaying with sales document number in profit center line item report. Can anyone please tell me where could be the problem.
Full points will be awarded for the answer.
Thanks & Regards
Srini

Hi,
what SAP release do you have ?
Normally the derivation of the functional area is made with the following logic:
1) manually entered
2) FI-Substitution (calling point 5 or 6 since ERP2004)
3) cost center
4) cost element
Please see also SAP note 106180 of how to correct wrong functional areas in PCA.
Best regards,
Andreas

Issue with sorting of TO line item while using LM05 / LM07

Hi,
We have found an issue in using LM05 / LM07 trnasactionwhile performing picking activity using the RF transaction.
1. Transfer Order is created for the same Material and Batch Combination with multiple line items. So when we display the TO the materials appear in the sequence of TO line item say 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 etc.
2. When we try to confirm the transfer order using LM05 the system is not picking the line items in the order that the TO was created. It is pickinga a random line item from the order and selecting an item from the lower line items of the TO's.
We have debugged and found that there is no specific sort sequence which is changing the sequence of line items as all the sort eliments have the same values except that there are few empty fields. The statement where the sort sequence is changing is 'SORT TMP_SORT_TAB BY NLTYP SORLP NLENR MATNR CHARG' but my concern is it is not sorting by this sequence specified in the code after execution.
If anyone has seen this kind of an issue and has a solution please let me know.
Thanks in Advance,
Harish

As for std SAP ME59N - make sure there is not rounding value is activated in the Material master as well as info record
If this is not the case than check any custom code is activated for ME59N
becuase generally in many compnay when they use ME59n they don't want the same material from diff PR to create the diff line item in the PO so using the custom logic in the user exist they trick the code
it might be the case for you where you have issue.

Issue with PR conversion to PO using ME59 withqty of similar line items

Hi All,
I'm having an issue with PR conversion to PO using ME59
I have a PR with the following line items with all same details except quantity
ex 1
Mat Qty Unit Plant   St Loc
M1   1    EA   P1      S1
M1   29   EA   P1      S1
The PR brings in the Unit automatically
EA is Base Unit Of Measure -Material Master
BT is Order Unit           -Material Master
Conversion
30 EA = 1BT
When i convert this PR to PO using ME59N then i see 2 lines items
M1   1   BT
M2   1   BT
Its doubling the qty (2 BT = 60 EA)
ex 2
Mat Qty Unit Plant   St Loc
M1   1    EA   P1      S1
M1   2    EA   P1      S1
M1   27   EA   P1      S1
The PR brings in the Unit automatically
EA is Base Unit Of Measure -Material Master
BT is Order Unit           -Material Master
Conversion
30 EA = 1BT
When i convert this PR to PO using ME59N then i see 2 lines items
M1   1   BT
M1   1   BT
M1   1   BT
Its 3 times no
PR Qty = 30 EA
PO qty = 3 BT = 90 EA
I guess during conversion to PO
It sees PR Line item 1 and looks for another line items with similar fields ( in our case it sees line 2 in ex 1 and 2 and 3 in ex 2)
i adds the qty 1 and 29 in ex1 and converts the total 30 each to 1 BT and when it moves to 2 line it see item1 and again creates 1BT but the line item 2 was already considered and it should be ignored
Similarly if you see ex2 then it creates 3 limes with 1 BT each
Let me know how to resolve this issue
Thanks

As for std SAP ME59N - make sure there is not rounding value is activated in the Material master as well as info record
If this is not the case than check any custom code is activated for ME59N
becuase generally in many compnay when they use ME59n they don't want the same material from diff PR to create the diff line item in the PO so using the custom logic in the user exist they trick the code
it might be the case for you where you have issue.

LIne items Diff

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for