NOTE TO EVERYBODY

BECAUSE ADOBE CANT PROVIDE SUPPORT ....
there are fraud people that might trick you under the same name ADOBY SYSTEMS 24x7 support.
And thats exactly what is happening here.
ADOBE the Fu****CK with links and chat with cheap labor.
BE EXTREMELY CAREFULL - DO NOT TRUST ANY ONE - NOT EVEN ADOBE

Dear subscriber
Involving with the beast (ADOBE) is hard.
Take a quick tour of my issue.
Its been 5 days now and my shop can't work.
Not the design or printing department.
Just because no one from adobe can renew or do anything about my subscription.
You might believe that paying the subscription will make you feel safer and legit.
Reconsider. In my case i would have install every hacking / cracking version there is. Its free and without any problems.
Its free and without any problems.
Its free and without any problems.
Its free and without any problems.
Its free and without any problems.
Its free and without any problems.
Its free and without any problems.

Similar Messages

6110 notes: Route 66 and Nokia Map (Smartogo) in a...

Hi,
Just sharing some observations after trying out the two maps for navigation in a city.
a) Responsiveness: Route66 is definitely more responsive in re-routing once you drive off the recommended route. It typically provide new directive immediately, whereas Nokia map will take a couple of seconds for recalculations.
b) Quality of re-route: When a route is missed, Route66 seems to provide more 'human-like' new route. Whereas, Nokia Map seems to work on partial re-route, and try to find the "next possibility" with the objective to make a "U-turn" to get back to the previous calculated route. The difference is important in real life, since making U-turns in an un-familiar location can be dangerous, but more importantly, can dis-orientate most people who are not adept in navigation in the first place. So, Route66 seems to be smarter than 'smartogo' on this respect.
c) User interface: Nokia Map (smartogo) seems to be lacked of the short-cut keys that Route66 already provice (such as key 5, 6 etc). Also, the satellite info page seems rudimental.
However, the screen layout of the Nokia Map seems more useful than Route66, but Route66 has more fancy graphics. So, it is clear that Route66 has been optimised for novice in navigation, making it as easy as possible.
d) Voice navigation: Route66 seems to be straight-to-the-point, i.e. clear instruction. Nokia Map tends to be a bit more chatty and delayed. For example, quite frequently, it would say "next possibility", which is useless, except seems to project to me that it is not sure. Also, by the time it finished saying 'possibility', you already missed the turn out.
When one is on the road and decide to rely on the voice navigation, just tell me what to do at the right time, cut out the sweet talks.
e) Landmark management. This one, Nokia Map is definitely one up.
Well, it seems that Route66 is the way to go at this point since it seems a more mature product. However, I think Nokia Map has many tricks up the sleeves, it seems, especially in terms of integration with other applications.
I still love google map for the satellite view, nothing can beat having a preview of the terrain of the route one selects. However, this is not for everybody, I admit.

I find Route66 also tends to keep trying to send me back to the route it initially calculated for far too long after I've diverted off - usually to avoid traffic jams.
The one feature I would really like on Route66 - and which I always assumed would be in any routing software - is a "find me another route that avoids this road" option. Can't understand why that one isn't available as the code that handles the real time traffic data could easily be adapted to do it.

Address data not gettting repaired with HRALXSYNC in HR system

Hi All
While checking the consistency of HR Master data and BP data for an employee using HRALXSYNC , it was found that Addresss data is in red traffic light . We did repair it and it changed to Green traffic light .But when you run the report HRALXSYNC again for the same employee we find the same inconsistency with address in Red traffic light.
I am new to SAP HCM . Any help or suggestion is highly appreciated !
Thanks in Advance
BR
VN

Hi,
How exactly "did you fix" it? What are the steps followed within the report?
Regards,
Adriana
ps - it could be an idea to give points to the people who are answering you, cause this might stimulate some of the consultants to invest some more time in trying to help you; I noticed that the people who give points receive more feedback from the others. Of course, this may not influence everybody, but still....

Lightroom Upgrade at a client - sucess? - keyword problem deal breaker

Hi
Just a small report, on how upgrading a client's LR 2 catalog went.
Background: The client is a professional photographer specialized on garden photography. Her customers are gardening and lifestyle magazines who publish her photos regularly as illustrations to various articles. She has a professional Canon EOS 1Ds MK III equipment and shoots exclusively raw. In a shoot around 300 to 1000 images are shot. The Lightroom catalog has around 20,000 images currently.
In Lightroom she uses mostly DAM and some basic development features, images are delivered either as raw of as JPEG images to the clients. Keywording is especially important. She has an extensive hierarchical list of plants most of them multiword keywords with spaces, and lots of other keywords indicating if images were sent to clients and other stuff.
The upgrade went just very well. I exported the catalog to a new intermediate catalog without previews, installed LR3 and imported this intermediate catalog into LR3 generating new previews from scratch. The hardware is modest, and some functional tests (especially switching images in develop, spot tool, and adjustment brushes) revealed that everything performs well enough.
Then she asked me where she would have benefits from using the new version. And then I told the whole benefit story, which can be read everywhere.
- New process version, better details and noise reduction. She asked where she can see it? Hmm, I switched to 1:1 view changing the process versions, not really much to see on Canon 1Ds Mk III files. Even with noisier files, it was hard to tell, what has actually changed. So only a 4:1 view very tiny changes were visible. The impact on her business? Near to nothing as she does not print large. The differences would hardly be seen in the magazine prints.
- Lens corrections and perspective control: does not really matter in garden photography, but she could see some occasional usefullness.
- Publish services: no real need for it
- Print packages: nope
- Slightshow improvements: no use for it
- Performance improvements: nothing visible
- Effects: completely superfluous
- New import dialog: at first glance a hindereance, as she has to get used to it
Then she asked: did they correct the keyword handling, when entering keywords witrh spaces? (You know the nasty bug, where keyword completion is broken at keywords with spaces). We checked (I knew it wasn't fixed), and of course she was heavily disappointed. Thus, after 2 years of development nothing new for her, keyword bug not fixed? Of course she said, that I should tell her, when keyword completion works, then and only then would she consider an upgrade.
So, despite all the bells and whistles about the new version, I doubt that for many photographers the benefits are really so overwhelming in the real world. It is a pitty that Adobe continues to neglect the DAM features (some fresh ideas for client management would be great), that existing features aren't consequently implemented (esp. the possibilities to query the catalog, and keywording), and that existing bugs are constantly ignored and not fixed.
So, please Adobe, get keyword completion fixed for keywords with spaces immediately !!! This is what professionals need. A catalog without reliable DAM features, renders the catalog concept to a great extend useless. Please listen!
Disclaimer: As I am not a professional for me the situation is not the same. I just report my experience I had, with a photgrapher, who needs a proper asset management. I recommended Lightroom to her because of the overall package (she moved from Cumulus), so I feel a little obliged to help her in this issue. In my case, as a user of a modest Lumix G camera system, I would consider the IQ benefits more signifcant. I don't know, if this is a general observation.
Kind regards
Thomas

W.W. Webster wrote:
tgutgu wrote:
Just a small report, on how upgrading a client's LR 2 catalog went ...
So, please Adobe, get keyword completion fixed for keywords with spaces immediately !!! This is what professionals need. A catalog without reliable DAM features, renders the catalog concept to a great extend (sic) useless. Please listen!
I just report my experience I had, with a photgrapher (sic), who needs a (sic) proper asset management.
So the over-riding conclusion from your experience with just one photographer is that Lightroom is 'useless', and this compels you to demand, in bold type, that Adobe must listen?
That Lightroom has issues and areas for ongoing development is obvious, and Adobe won't dispute this. But rants like yours add nothing and are unhelpful. Julie's response is extremely tactful and far more moderate than your post deserves.
Dear Mr. Webster
I think when you post, you should definitely change your tone. Julie simply answered my original post by acknowledging the problem, your accusation that I did not use appropriate "netiquette" is ridiculous. Posts like yours are a real problem of this forum.
I simply gave a user story example to show that not for everybody the shiny advertised new features provide real benefits and that paying attention to a thorough implementation of features can be equally important. I think Julie has recognized this. And the issue is nothing for ongoing developments. Lightroom supports keywords with spaces, so it has to be done consequently. Keywording is essential for DAM. If keywording gets too tedious or leads to wrong keyword assignments, then DAM is really pointless.
The intention of my post was to point Adobe to an apparently small problem, which has quite a big impact to people, who depend on good DAM features. The issue is nothing new, existed since the first release of Lightroom, but nothing was done about it, unfortunately. Now that Lightroom addressed keywords with spaces even with a new preference setting, it was fair to assume, that they had done something about it with care. This isn't so obviously. The issue was discussed in previous threads, but did not get any visible notice from Adobe. I am glad that this has changed now with Julie's post.
In no way did I say that Lightroom is useless or even that I regard it to be so. I merely said that the catalog concept is to a great extend (not completely) useless, if its implementation is sloppy. DAM starts with data entry and only after doing this, you can use it to your benefit. Therefore it has to be efficient, which currently is not. Lightroom is criticized by a large number of users that it is forcing them into a catalog system instead of just providing access to the file system. Long existing bugs like this, likely proves them right in their view.
The competition (I mean complete workflow solutions) is not really better than Lightroom with respect to DAM features, however, my take is, that the developers should be equally ambitious with the quality of the catalog system as they are with IQ, especially if the achievements in IQ are apparently less relevant to owners of high end camera systems. (I could be wrong with the last statement, but it would be interesting to hear if others have similar observations).
Kind regards
Thomas
Thomas

I recently updated to latest iTunes and now my pc freezes. I have a Tosiba 32bit running Windows Vista. Itunes will no longer connect to the store and I get error 42408 when opening ITunes. Please help!!

When I open iTunes I get the error message 42408.
I have googled and tried various solutions including
- uninstalling, downloading and reinstalling. I have done that about 5 times.
- sending the desktop icon to the rubbish bin and recreating a shortcut.
- de-authorising the audible account. My computer goes thru the de- authorisation process and says that the account is deauthorised then when I go to re-authorise under Advanced all that is showing is to de-authorise the account. Weird.
- contacted a tech guy locally and he has no clue. He's thinking it's probably a conflicting software problem. Obviously.
I have to uninstall the iTunes program just so I can use the internet as the new version slows/freezes everything and makes doing anything on my computer ridiculous.
Everything on my computer runs fine when Itunes is uninstalled. Great. not.
I would appreciate some further guidance as unfortunately iTunes seems to have complete control over my life. LOL! Basically if iTunes fails the rest follows... It's a dominoe effect...

Update:
I contacted Apple Support and they agreed to waive the $40.00 tech support charge this one time which was very nice condsidering their update caused major problems with my computer. I realise I don't have to accept the updates but when they are released world wide to the public I do expect them to work relatively smoothly.
To cut a long story short after following the tech support advice and uninstalling and reinstalling itunes 10.5 for the seventh time and more than a week of going in circles and days spent away from my business trying to fix the problem - I gave up. Because, as a non computer geek, (no offense - I think cg's are amazing) what I need is a functioning computer and phone to run my business that can be both relied on - all the time. That is what I paid for and expected when I bought Apples' very smart iPhone - I did not expect to be plagued by an update to a program that causes chaos for over 7 days. (And to be frank I've had problems with iTunes for the whole time I have been using it. From importing cd's to purchasing problems. gah!)
I may be one tiny person in a very large universe but I believe a certain standard can and should be expected when handing over hard earned cash to a company with a good reputation.
I'm very disappointed with Apple.
Unfortunatley they have lost a customer...
This is how I fixed the problem:
Yesterday I bought a new smartphone - the Samsung Galaxy phone uses the Android Market and the Kies program. The phone is as good as if not better than the iPhone. The Kies program runs very smoothly on my computer. Downloading Apps is a breeze. My new phone is about the same size as the iPhone and a tad lighter.
Problem solved!
As a side note - I will now save about $250.00 per year on my new prepaid phone plan with Boost compared to staying with my previous post-paid plan. I also get unlimited standard national calls in Australia plus unlimited texting too! Not bad for $40.00 a month.
While this solution worked for me it may not suit everybody.

How to make a page blind accessible

Hey Y'all, I run a website for a die-cast toy car
manufacturer (
Liberty Promotions - View
it here ), The way the page is designed primarily uses images,
of the cars, and of the descriptions (we do this so we can control
the font, for Pirates 2, we use a pirate font found online, so the
"look" is the same) and pretty much everything else. Yes I know its
a lot of images, its heavy on the download time, and its a pain to
edit. But my boss likes it that way, and so thats the way, at least
for now, that it is going to stay. We havent had many complaints
about it till now, and this one threw me for a loop:
One of our clients won a contest we are running to submit
possible suggestions to be made into our die-cast cars, this
client's suggestion was taken as this times winner and we are
starting to produce the cars. On the site when someone wins we
display a photo, and a synopsis about them and there collection.
While talking to this guy telling him what I needed, he infomed me
that his is blind., but still collects our products, (very much a
"seeing is believing" type of product") I was flabergasted, and
then he said he had a comment, that (go figure) our site being very
much image based does not translate well onto his page reader
(windows- eyes), So I talked to him a little more and decided that
especially for the car he "visualized" I would make an effort to
make it very Windows-Eyes friendly, so that he could get the full
description of the buses, the schedule, etc... using his reader,
and not have to call in someone else to read it for him. Of course
I would like to start building this into all my future pages, just
to make it easier for him and for anyone else in the same
situation. But, I dont know where to start. Can anyone give me some
good suggestions on how to do this? Can I use a <div
class"visibility: hidden;"> to hide the same text that is on the
graphics (i.e.- Take the text from the description in PS and
Copy/Paste into DW) and then have it be hidden from all Visual
readers, or should I do something different? Please help, I know I
would appreciate it, and so would he!
Thanks

Thierry | www.TJKDesign.com wrote:
> Osgood wrote:
>
>>Thierry | www.TJKDesign.com wrote:
>
>
>>>The OP asked about making his web site accessible
to
>>>*screen-readers*, not to "everybody".
>>>For a screen-reader user, the size of text
graphic is *irrelevant*.
>
>
>>So why is it that many accessible sites lack text
imagery, perhaps
>>less than those that are not claiming to be
accessible. I would
>>assume that if you can't see very well and use a
screen reader it
>>doesnt matter how many text images you use so long as
you have some
>>alt text explaining what it is.
>
>
> Graphic text is more an issue for what you call
"regular" people than for
> Assistive Technology (AT) users.
> Not all people who can't read small text need to use AT
> My eyesight is not too bad but not too good either. I
use browsers with
> their default settings, if I ran into a site on which
text is too small for
> my liking, I don't reach for glasses, I just leave that
site.
I'm not suggesting using body text as graphics. Most
'decorative'
graphics that contain text are of sufficient size that anyone
with what
you call 'regular' eyesight will be able to read the text. If
they don't
fall into the 'regular' bracket then most likely they need a
screen reader.
People leave the site for many reasons...one being typically
uninspiring.
>>>I found many of the sites you call "awfully
boring accessible
>>>sites" not really "attractive" at first, but it
turns out that they
>>>are the ones today I visit the most. I don't see
that "awful boring
>>>look" you're talking about anymore, I just see
what's for me
>>>*valuable content* delivered without distracting
visual effects and
>>>stuff.
>>
>>What's good for one isn't always necessarily good for
another, thank
>>goodness ;)
>
>
> You're bringing everything back to "design" but web
design is not the same
> as "web design".
> Go to Dallas in September:
>
http://www.webjamsession.com/sessions/why_good_content_must_suck/
How is saying that everyone has different opinions on what
they like and
dislike bringing everything back to design? You just fail to
see
anything other than from your own point of view which makes
you a bit
typecast, in my opinion
>>>So, bottom line is to know if these authors are
design-challenged or
>>>in fact pretty smart since they "designed" web
sites that make
>>>people keep coming back ;)
>>
>>No one knows anything for sure and those that assume
they do are just
>>fooling themselves, no-one else ;)
>
>
> I believe log files can be trusted ;)
You only have access to your own log files not every other
persons site
logs. Again YOU think you know everything based on your own
experience.
People have different experiences but only yours seems to be
correct.
>>>If you visit sites that talk about accessibility
you can't really
>>>expect to see Flash animations and "super cool
designs", but that's
>>>because of the audience of these web sites not
because of
>>>Accessibility "features".
>>
>>Developeres with good intentions go to these sites to
see what 'true'
>>accessibility is all about. They see mostly sterile
looking sites and
>>think again. If these accessible information sites
did something to
>>improve their visual appeal that would be a
help....but I guess thats
>>unlikely because as you say they actually don't care
about
>>presentation.
>
>
> Design and presentation are two very different beast on
the web.
Thats complete rubbish....design and presentation are
interlinked.
> I'd say they do not care for design, but they do care
for presentation;
> that's why I mentionned in a previous post the first
heading being almost
> below the fold ;)
> I just read one of the most interesting article I've
read about the title
> attribute, I'd say there was almost no "design" at all
attached to it but I
> wouldn't want it styled differently.
That's because you cannot distinguish between general
information sites
and sites which need to sell. Once you do that we can hold a
sensible
debate.
You don't usually have to buy general information you do have
to buy
products.
>>Its hard to push for accessibility when it 'appears'
you are limited
>>in what elements you can use or ideally should'nt use
according to the
>>sites which address accessibility. In my opinion they
do nothing to
>>help the cause of accessibility. If their sites could
be presented
>>better visually....I guess they can't because some
are so basic and
>>those that are not I don't know what level of
accessibility they
>>adhere too.
>
>
> Once again, it is the choice of the authors of these
sites (or their lack of
> design skills may be), but not the results of following
Accessibility
> guidelines.
That's not helping to push accessibility though is
it.......I'm trying
to help accessibility along a bit here ;)
>>I was sifting though some of the sites at GAWDS a few
weeks ago. Some
>>are really quite nice, some are not very inspiring.
Some don't work in
>>some browsers as well as they could and should
do.........go figure.
>>It appears that anything goes. Its great to talk
about this and that
>>but when it comes down to it those that talk the talk
sometime fail to
>>deliver and then make poor excuses for not delivering
when challenged.
>
>
> I don't know where you want to go with this.
> GAWDS's "site of the month" is not like
www.accessites.org awards.
> There is nothing "formal" in the process we go through
when rating these
> sites.
If that is true, which I doubt its meaningless and once again
confuses
accessibilty issues.
>>>What is not my "personal cup of tea" for example
are "cool sites"
>>>with images and things in header/banner that
place the first heading
>>>almost below the fold ;)
>
>
>>We all have likes and dislikes.
>
>
> I think there are things outside of this "we all have
likes and dislikes", I
> believe there are common issues in web design that are
known to be "bad
> things/ideas to implement" there are no aesthetic or
design considerations
> there because *best practice* goes beyond that.
I'll say again what you consider to be 'best practices' other
people may
not.
>>>I used the web to get information; for me as a
user, "visual
>>>experience" comes *second*.
>>
>>Ideally I would like a combination of both but if a
site looks
>>distinctly uninteresting and I don't 'really' need
the information
>>that desperately I usually go on to one that is
presented a little
>>more excitingly.
>
>
> I agree that the best is to have a good balance of both,
but again I don't
> think this is an issue with Accessibility per se. It is
most of the time
> because of the author (lack of design skills) or because
of the client (no
> budget for accessibility).
Its something we don't really know and as such is difficult
to debate.
>>I've said before you have to take a number of issues
into
>>consideration at the outset before you committ to
anything. I don't
>>approach jobs with a sterotypical mindset. In my
opinion projects
>>need to be approached differently and with different
sets of values.
>
>
> Who said otherwise?
> Actually, if you put Accessibility into the picture, you
do need to think a
> bit out of the box since it makes the project more
challenging ;)
One needs to take everything into consideration and make the
right
decision. Of course whether one makes the correct decision is
very
personal to what they believe is important and not so
important.

Preview doesn't do the obvious...

I am trying to set up a simple presentation of a series of images.
I can create a slideshow of them in Preview but can not save the slideshow. It would have been obvious to let you save them as a QuickTime movie or print them to a multi-page pdf file. No way.
In fact this has lead me to waste an entire day unsuccessfully chasing apps to let me do this simple task.
Quicktime is crude beyond belief and failed to create a slideshow with a large number of files. It wasn't even graceful in its failure, it just went through the motions and produced no file.
I tried several times, hunting through my desktop and HDs trying to find possible places it had dumped them, to no avail.
Keynote makes me drag each file into a tailor made file and then hand place & adjust each image. It won't even let me bring in the files unless I go via iPhoto which is itself clumsy and quite confusing in its organisation style. The alternative is to drag in 1 file from the desktop, create a new page & drag in 1 file from the desktop etc. Imagine doing this for 100s of images!
iPhoto only allows 3 sizes for exported movies, none of which match my file sizes and is excruciatingly slow and seems to hang at the end with a perpetually spinning beachball.
Besides I hate having to take things into iPhoto as it creates yet more duplicates of my files, in places I have trouble locating and eats up my bootdrive.
iMovie creates huge files, blowing everything up into ridiculously large sizes.
Pages has basically the same problems as Keynote with some extra gotchas thrown in.
So much for iLife which seems to consider Hidden Features = Intuitive User Interface.
I am now going through a dozen 3rd party apps all of which also fail to deliver the goods.
How hard can this be for a simple slideshow?
Beaut iMac G5 2Ghz + G4 400 AGP upgraded to G4 1000 that bombs all the time Mac OS X (10.4.6)

Peter
I have done all that. Next time I imported photos from my camera it stuck them back into the original iPhoto Library Folder on my bootup drive. By the time I noticed, I had a lovely shemozzle of some in one location and some in another with no clean way of sorting them out.
If you launch iPhoto with the external HD disconnected, it will create a library in the default position. A simple habit to get into is to hold down the option key when launching iPhoto and forcing yourself to choose the library each time, especially if you occasionally launch the app with the HD not available. Works for iTunes too.
As for all the rest there is nothing flagging whether a particular file has or hasn't been copied, or is merely linked,
There's nothing to flag. This is a one time decision. Either you want to Copy the Files to the iPhoto Library Folder or you don't. If you do, leave iPhoto in it's default settings, otherwise change the option at Preferences -> Advanced.
or you are dealing with an edited copy, or there is no edited copy and that is it.
The iPhoto Window always shows you the most recent version of the pic. If you can't recall whether you've previously edited it, simply right-click on it. If Revert To Original is available, it's been previously edited. If not, it hasn't. (Or a quick glance at the View menu will tell you the same thing.)
It is a mess which you are supposed to leave as an all or nothing or take extensive notes in a notebook attached to your monitor and consult before you do anything drastic.
I have 35 gigs of pics and no notebook. Of course, iPhoto is not for everybody. Many people prefer a simple image viewer as opposed to a Photo Organiser.
I can get my head around iTunes (even when it makes repeated linking errors) but iPhoto is a black cat tied up in a sack in a locked trunk in the bottom of the basement with the bulb burned out.
You do realise that both apps are databases, and like any database they require that you manipulate the data from within the app rather than through the finder. The good news is that pretty much anything you need to do can be achieved from within the apps. There's a very helpful community over at the iPhoto discussions.
Regards
TD

Can I share music ONLY between users on same mac? I want to keep all other media separate

I just bought a new macbookpro and I am trying to set up two users (me and my wife) to share iTunes music ONLY and keep all the other media such as mobile applications.
Can this be done?
I followed the instrucitons to share music, but it mentions moving the entire "iTunes Media" folder to a shared location...I only want to share the music

Do you mean each person having copies of the tracks, or you both share one copy of the tracks? You can do the latter but you will have to manage media on your own which is not for everybody (because you have to know what you are doing). It also means that what one person does to the tracks will happen to the other, so if you don't both agree on track information it will get messsy.

Hiding the Birthday Column in the search help in transaction PA20

Steps to generate the issue.
1) Goto transaction PA20.
2) Use the search help (Press F4) in the personnel number field.
A search help pops up.
3) In the 'Last Name - First Name' tab enter 'M*' in the 'Last Name' field and select the enter button.
A list of employees is displayed. In my system along with the last name and first names the employees birthday is displayed.
The business would like this field hidden as they have decided that this is sensitive information that they do not want everybody to have access to.
Can this be hidden by making a change to configuration? How do I go about this?

Dear Mark,
After pressing F4, when the list will be shown, select the heading of the birthday coloumn, right click, then select personalize, then select Birth date, and click hide fields switch which is in the same screen, then click enter.
See your problem is solved.
Thanks & Regards
Jasaswi

Where can I send an idea for a new feature.

I have an idea for a new feature in Illustrator. I'd like to share it to the developers.
Is there a channel to send your idea?
Thank you!

Thanks for the replies.
I know that this feature does not serve everybody, but I could use it on a weekly basis.
I don't know if there is a script for this, and if there is, plese let me know it.
Transparent working window.
So I could set my whole artboard window transparent and still work on it.
I could easily and fast trace some shapes from locked PDF's and also directly from the browser without copying the image to my computer.
The problem is, of course, that Zoom would only work in the graphics in the Illustrator (needless to say) and would not affect to the graphics behind the Illustrator window.
But still I think I could use it very much.
For examble I could manually draw simple shapes and logos straight from the customers website, without downloading the poor JPG image.
Please let me know what you think about it.
Sorry if there is some mistakes, English is not my native.
I hope you got the point.

IdeaPad U430p - Win 8.1 watermark SecureBoot

Hi, I bought before +- 14 days notebook IdeaPad U430p Grey
with configurations i5-4200u 8gb ddr3 geforce 730m
in notebook is preinstalled original windows 8 64bit
because i have msdn account i have original iso windows 8.1 64bit
so i after fresh install windows 8 from onerecovery i upgrade with this iso on win 8.1
for installing i used key what provide microsoft and for activation after installing win8.1 i used key from lenovo original windows 8.
activation is okay and windows 8.1 shows that is all okay.
I HAVE ONLY ONE MAIN PROBLEM!
in widnows 8.1 in lower right corner windows shows watermark with text "Not configured SecureBoot"
but i install windows 8 and after upgrade on 8.1 with UEFI in bios and in bios I have "Enabled" SecureBoot.
When I call into microsoft, microsoft support tell me "go to bios and enabled secureboot" but I have enabled this features.
Please help me with this, because this watermark is really annoying, Thanks.
Solved!
Go to Solution.

so on this notebook will be able to win8.1 operating system only with this feature turn-off?
Answer: I can't answer your question. In the first place I really would not be installing a beta, RTM, or whatever except the final version on my system. Since you have install it then you must have made the assertion to yourself that you qualify as an IT professional as stated in the warning sign in microsoft's website. And that you are capable of solving whatever problem that you may encounter due to the installation.
What users upgrade via store from 8 on 8.1, what after?
It will have all the users who will upgrade watermark? It's crazy
Answer: You don't understand what that version is for. It is not for everybody yet. So not all user are installing it. I have installed it once in a virtual box but remove it later.
(and turn-off feature SecureBoot in bios this isn't best solution if you understand me what i mean,
because for this must user before installing Win OS set in bios legacy mode too, but in upgrading via store this isn't fresh install OS but only upgrading, so this can not be done)
Answer: You ask for help so I presented you my help. It is not for you to make a criticism out of it but to solve what you have describe. Why would you use legacy mode? Can you explain why? Is it necessary to install Win 8.1 preview through the store? I install mine not through the store. I do not have the time to make any explanation for every suggestion made. If you want a full understanding go to some institution or forum that provide such a service.

How do I put windows 8 on my iMac?

How do I put windows 8 on my iMac?
<Re-Titled By Host>

installing windows on a computer from scratch is not for everybody, installing windows in boot-camp is a bit harder check out the guides and if you don't feel up for it get help from somebody who have exp installing windows some things are close to impossible to handler over the Internet

Soft images in Bridge/ PS CS4

Hi, I'm wondering if anyone here who uses PS CS4 & Bridge can help me with an issue that has been bugging me for a while. I am at the point where I am considering selling my gear and reinvesting in something else, both in terms of software and hardware.
I shoot with a Sony A700 and a number of lenses (nifty fifty, sigma 24-70 DG HSM, Tamron 90mm 2.8) and have noticed that no matter what I shoot the images look a lot bright, softer and fuzzy when i get them onto the PC (even considering that the pc screen is so much bigger than the a700's screen).
I have noticed that when I view the images in Bridge, there is a short period of time before bridge has loaded all the images that the image thumbnails themselves appear nice and sharp (as i see them on the cameras screen), then a split second later they are changed so that they all look brighter and a lot softer. If I "purge cache for selection" then the thumbnail appears nice and sharp again. Then when I open the image - which takes me to ACR in photoshop the nasty processing is reapplied.
Is bridge applying some kind of processing or profile to all the images before i even get round to processing them myself? It is ruining my pictures and I am at my wits end with it.When the images are opened in ACR the brightness has been ramped up (although i cant remember the exact settings that are listed as i am at work and my pc is at home), and changing the settings to "As shot" makes no difference at all.
What am I missing? What settings are being applied by the software (this also happens when i load the images straight from CS4 and cut out Bridge altogether) that makes the images look so much worse than they should? I'm fed up with the images loading all soft and a fair bit brighter than they should be. Trying to manually get the images back to where they should be in terms of clarity and brightness/ contrast has so far proved to be impossible, for me at least. And besides, I shouldnt need to be doing this in the first place!
I should also note that I am obviously talking about RAW images and not JPEGS!
Look forward to any suggestions as to what is going on??!

What you are seeing here is the processing, or lack of processing, of the Raw image. Raw is just that it is unprocessed. The image you see on the camera and for a brief instant in Bridge is the jpeg image (embedded thumbnail) the camera generates.
The is a lot of stuff in ACR that could affect this, and I am no expert. I recommend you copy and post this question in the camera raw forum. http://forums.adobe.com/community/cameraraw?view=discussions
When you get a concise answer that gets you sharp images please post it here so others that come across this thread can benefit.
Message was edited by: Curt Y Shooting Raw is not for everybody as it does take more effort to process than a jpeg. Just depends on the subject matter, what you want to do with final picture, and how much you like to tinker with the image. If you find you like the pictures as shot, then use Raw only for tricky exposure shots that might require more manipulation to get a good image.

CP1515n and HPLIP don't use black cartige

Hello,
I'm using the CP1515n as anetwork printer for Windows and Linux systems manly for printing documents (PDF, Word OpenOffice).
While printing from Windows works fine under Linux when printing in color mode I can't get the printer to use the black cartridge for text.
Not that this uses uneccesary much toner it also leads to ppor apereance since if you look a little closer you can see some coloured pixel around.
Is the anything I can do about that? Under Windows the driver has an option named "always print text with black" which I'm missing under linux, on the web interface I can't find an option to set this manually either.
I even tried the latest HPLIP this just leads to complete failing of color printing so I switched back to the "official" debain version.
uname:
Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 #1 SMP Mon Oct 3 03:59:20 UTC 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux
hplip:
HP Linux Imaging and Printing System (ver. 3.10.6)
Device Information Utility ver. 5.2
print-string:
lpr -P HP_Color_LaserJet_CP1515n -o OptionDuplex=False -o PageSize=A4 -o PageRegion=A4 -o Duplex=None -o InputSlot=Auto -o ColorModel=RGB -o MediaType=Plain -o OutputMode=Normal

Geoff
Maybe remove your matrox tools and drivers and hardware and try again. I removed my Matrox MX02 and my system is fast and stable and with the BM. I think a PC is just as good as any Mac and I am sure is faster if you have the correct hardware and is setup correctly. I visited a editor who edits on a Mac Pro FCP for TV shows and realized that mac is not what everybody rants and raves about the time it took him to complete what he was doing, I could have done it much quicker. I do agree Mac's are good for certain applications but so they should be at the price they sell for. IMO bang for buck nothing can come close to PC and CS5.
I would get in touch with one of the PC Builders on this site and Ask for help as I believe there is nothing wrong with Adobe CS5 and the PC format.
Darren

IBooks/iBA quirky behavior

I already sent a note to the iBA Team, but I figured you may want to be alerted to the follow problem:
I created a test document in iBooks Author and use the connected iPad Preview mode to view the documents. Within the iBooks document, I can easily annotate it. That works well. Now if I go to iBA and modify the text, possibly adding or removing some content, and preview on the iPad once more the content appropriately adjusts. However, the notes created on the iPad remain locked in their original physical location at the time they were individually created. There seems to be no ability to move these notes or completely purge them.
I thought that deleting the title from iBooks, removing the iBooks2 icon from the list of multi-task items, doing a cold reboot (pressing power and home button for several seconds) should be enough to completely flush those uber sticky notes. Unfortunately it is not.
Although this quirky behavoir only appears on the iPad and not the iBA software, this is going to present a problem to authors and publishers, should they ever tweak their published content in the slightest (such as fixing a typographical error after the title has already made it's way to the iBooks Store). If this is not corrected everybody loses, starting with the customer. It's an embarrassment to Apple, the publisher, and the author. Frankly, the only one to gain from this is Amazon/Kindle.

90% of browser rendering problems are caused by code validation errors.
See reported HTML errors:
http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1&uri=http%3A%2F%2Fcmweb.pvschools.net%2Fcomedweb%2F comedtest%2Fpvusd_website%2Fearlychildhood1.html
Suggestion: You might find it easier to work with HTML 4 instead of XHTML doc types. To change a document type go to File > Convert > pick one that fits your coding skills (HTML 4.0 transitional is more forgiving than than strict).
Then run your code through the validation tool again. That should remove some of your code errors. Fix any remaining errors - but you can skip Flash code because those never validate.
Nancy O.
Alt-Web Design & Publishing
Web | Graphics | Print | Media Specialists
www.alt-web.com/
www.twitter.com/altweb
www.alt-web.blogspot.com

NOTE TO EVERYBODY

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for