Original and transferred calls

Hi All,
In TCD what is the common field between an original inbound call and a transferred one by the agent.
Agent ID is not displayed in transferred call field.
Regards,

Hello my friend
I will extend your question to cradle to grave call tracking including CVP and CUCM CDR as well with the following answer (copyrighted by David Reich), but you can choose what is suitable for you...
Mapping CDR to TCD
The UCManager CDR does have a mapping to ICM Termination Call Detail record, but you need to do some conversion.
The CDR globalCallID_CallManagerID and globalCallID_CallId is combined to create the TCD PeripheralCallKey.
The globalCallID_CallManagerID is moved into the high order byte.  To shift it over the properly, multiply it by the hexadecimal value 1000000 and add it to the globalCallID_CallId.
So:
(globalCallID_CallId * 0x1000000) + globalCallID_CallId = PeripheralCallKey
These IDs are not unique because the same PeripheralCallKey and CallID are re-used in redirect, transfer and conference scenarios. 
Also, this only works with in a single cluster. So in a multiple cluster environment, you need to map Cluster CDRs to a specific PeripheralID.
Cradle to Grave Call Tracking in ICM
The RouterCallKeyDay, RouterCallKey, and RouterCallKeySequenceNumber will track a call from its first route until its final call leg.
The RouterCallKeyDay and RouterCallKey combine to provide common attribute across the calls.
The RouterCallKeySequenceNumber gives you some sense of order of when calls were created. (gselthof: so note, 'some sense' is not guaranteed order!!!)
In a multi-peripheral environment, this requires routing between peripherals. This means calls to the IVR need to be translation routed, and calls to other agent clusters need to be routed as well.
Identifying Routed Agent TCDs
You will want to filter out the TCDs created for the CVP call legs, and calls are generated for agents for internal agent to agent calls.
Use the AgentSkillTargetID to identify agent, SkillGroupSkillTagetID to identify SkillGroup, and CallTypeID to identify Call Type / program.
If all three of these values are filled in, you know you got a call that was routed to an agent. 
Sometimes more than one TCD will meet these three criteria for the same PeripheralCallKey In those cases, the one with the lowest RouterCallKeySequenceNumber will identify the first call answered by the agent.
CallDisposition
The CallDispositionFlag is the best indicator to find out if a call was handled or not. There are a bunch of CallDispositions. The CallDispositionFlag distills the results down to 7 categories.
You can find details on what the CallDispositionFlags are in the schema help or schema guide.
Cheers and Happy New Year!
Goran
TAC

Similar Messages

  • Ability to park/ transfere calls and log in/ out u...

    Hi!
    I need to become able to park and transfere calls to others using the *# commands. Also the ability to log in/ out of the Netcom Trådløs Bedrift-system using the commands *101# and *102#.
    When will this become able on the N900?

    Hello dorisg and welcome to the Apple Discussion Boards.
    Ernie Stamper referred me to your post. I live in Dubai and work in Abu Dhabi; I regularly use iChat to communicate with family in the United States. I can assure you that iChat works both via Etisalat (in both Dubai and Abu Dhabi) and via DIC Telecom.
    You should try Defcom's suggestion of changing the port, because I believe Etisalat does indeed block Port 5190; however Port 443 works.
    You should also make sure that all the correct iChat ports are open in System Preferences. Ralph Johns is another one of the iChat gurus; check out his web pages at http://www.ralphjohnsuk.dsl.pipex.com/
    If you still cannot connect, or you'd rather have somebody walk you through the settings over the telephone, send me an email (click on my name to find my email address in my profile) and we will get in touch offline.
    Good luck,
    DXB Law

  • Problem transferring calls between Voip phones when the call is originated

    Hi,
    I have configured a gateway h323 (3640- 12.3) to communicate with Cisco Callmanager 3.3(4).
    On the H323 gateway I have installed one BRI interface and one FXS interface.
    Inside my network I am using VoIP telephones 7910.
    Originating calls in the Voip telephones which destination is the PSTN is working fine;
    Receiving calls from PSTN that destination is VoIP telephones is OK also;
    Redirecting or doing “Hold” on calls between VoiP telephones works but…..
    When redirecting or doing “Hold” on calls between a VoiP telephone and a call from PSTN I loose the voice stream.
    Apparently, all signalling is working fine because when redirecting the call originated in the PSTN from one VoIP telephone to another VoIP telephone, I can see the Calling number ID. Even if I use the telephone keyboard, I can listen the tones, but I have no voice stream.
    Please any help will be welcome.
    Thanks,
    David Costa

    I have tried different configurations and now it is working. The problem is that I couldn’t identify were the miss configuration was.
    Another question is: Can I use a codec with compression between voip interface of h323 gateway and the Callmanager or Voip phones to pass music on hold?
    Now I only pass music on hold if I configure G.711 on the voip interface of h323 gateway.
    Thanks,
    David Costa

  • Origin of phone call and destination

    I was recently out of town for a while and looked at my husbands phone bill.  His origin of phone calls certain days came from scottsdale arizona even though we are in phoenix.  His other phone bills due not have scottsdale.  Of course he has been caught in many lies and swears he was never over there.  Is it possible signals got crossed r just another lie he is telling.  He has no clue I had to look at his phone bills.  thanks if anybody can give me advice.

    Obviously it is either one of two things: either he was actually there....or he was close enough that he picked up one of their towers which would have caused the origination to appear to be from that location when he was actually in another location. Happens ALL THE TIME so it's hard to tell. At this point, there's really no proof that he was there because of this HOWEVER if he has no previous calling history of his calls appearing to come from that location so I can understand your concern. It may have happen with other locations though.

  • Script help - caller's ANI and workflow call control actions

    Greetings!
    Apologies in advance for the wall of text.
    What does work: We have a main script where we do a database lookup on the caller's ANI - specifically, their area code. If there is a match in the DB we queue the call to a regional queue. If there is no match (some block their caller ID, or the ANI is less than 10 digits) we queue the call to a general queue. This works. Every time.
    Except ..
    So the call comes in, we do a successful lookup and route to the regional queue. The agent handles the call and transfers the caller to another queue. The agent in the second queue discovers the caller needs to go back to the regional queue and we have a call control action configured to handle this. And this is where I'm looking for some help.
    And so, the call control action setup does a blind conference back to the main script which does the lookup again based on the original caller's ANI and routes the call to the regional queue. However, everyone can hear everyone and the business unit would prefer the customer not be aware of the agents talking until the agents want to bring the customer into the conversation.
    So, if I change the call control action to another option (supervised conference) I lose the ability to route the call based on the original callers ANI. The main script queues the call to the general queue. I've done the reactive debugs and the caller ANI does not populate, the extension of the agent initiating the call control action populates the ANI field. What's more confusing is the caller ANI does populate in the enterprise data on the agent desktop. So the data must be "there" somewhere, I'm not sure how to get it so I can do the DB lookup.
    What am I missing?
    Thanks in advance for your time and attention!
    Keith

    Hello again.
    That's an nice way to do this. But I found another way around simple enough for the end customer too. It gives the ability to change things themselves.
    a) Under System Parameters > Media Parameters enable the 'User Prompts override System Prompts' parameter
    b) Create a subfolder (named el_GR in my case) under Applications > Prompts .../gen/phone
    c) Upload your number prompts recorded in the language you want
    d) Modify the 'Create Generated Prompt' as shown to the screenshot
    e) Now you can hear the string numbers in your language
    Took the info from the following posts:
    https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/2080962
    https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-13933

  • Upgrading to 3G - selling original and SIM card confusion

    A few days ago, I upgraded my original iPhone to the 3G. I'd now like to sell the original.
    If it matters, the 3G is a refurb from ATT - part of the process was to call ATT's automated service which simply transfered my existing number to the new phone. (I did not swap SIM cards). The old phone now shows "No Service".
    When I set up the new phone in iTunes, I used the "New Phone" option and simply re-synced my information.
    I've used the secure Erase function on the original and the phone shows the connect-to-computer symbol as when new.
    Everything I've read has said to remove the SIM before selling. Given the info I've provided, is that really necessary. What is the risk, or more specifically, what information could still be stored on the SIM card?
    -phil

    The old SIM card can be tossed out. As it was written to, and then deactivated and can not be touched again with another account.
    All the new buyer needs to do is obtain a new SIM card from at&t and they can assist with activation of the new buyers iPhone.
    I hope this clears things up a bit

  • Report on transferred calls

    I need to report on transferred calls. Agents are using standard CAD and selecting the transfer icon. Within the transfer form, they use the softphone to dial various 800 numbers. I need to create a report that I can group by 800 numbers called using the CAD transfer option. Does this come from the call manager? We recently implemented CVP. Are there any CVP reports that would provide this information?

    Hi Ryan
    I'm afraid there isn't one - only the CSQ Activity reports and the CSQ Service Level Priority Summary reports seem to show the service level info, and those are summary reports rather than reports that show call lists.
    You would need to get a custom report put together for this... it's an Informix SQL procedure-writing and Crystal Reports exercise to do that.
    Regards
    Aaron

  • I want to use my 1TB Seagate Hard drive for time machine and transferring files from Mac to PC.

    For about a year I've been using my 1TB external hard drive for only time machine. To be honest, it wasn't until today that I tried to connect my hard drive to a PC and realize it isn't compatible. I read about partitioning the hard drive so that it can work both for time machine and transferring files between pc and mac. I'm not what you would call tech savvy, so I was wondering if I can get some advice on how to do this.
    Thanks in advance.

    To do it, you have to partition the hard disk, so you will have one partition for Time Machine and another one to store files and use them in a PC and Mac. To create the partition, follow these steps > http://pondini.org/OSX/DU3.html
    In order to read and write in the external disk on the PC, you have to select "MS-DOS (FAT)" as "Format". If you choose any other option, the PC won't be able to read your external disk. Apart from that, note that you can't use files bigger than 4 GB with FAT. If you want to use the external disk with files bigger than 4 GB, you have to format your new partition in exFAT, and you have to do it on a PC

  • How do I speak with customer service above 'manager' title-- Incorrectly charged $280 and finally refunded most of it after many hours, disconnects and transfers!

    I have been a Verizon Wireless customer for 11+ years.  My monthly payments are usually in the $275 range which includes usage for phones and 2 tablets for my family.  That's a lot of $ each year!
    I am self employed.  My biz slows considerably in the winter-- income is slashed. When I realized I couldn't keep the account up this winter-- with an increase in excessive travel costs for my business due to a new long commute for work, and business being down considerably during winter months-- I called in and requested Verizon to suspend service without billing until I can pay my bill in full.  They said sure.  We worked together to find a workable payment arrangement, which I had to modify a couple of times, but all in all it worked.  Thank you Verizon!  But then, I went online to pay the amount agreed to.  Several days later, I realized Verizon program apparently has a glitch-- it took the full amount due ($563) rather than the agreed amount ($63 then, with agreement to further pay $250 end of April, $250 end of May). I called immediately.  Verizon refused to credit back. My bank researched the situation and resolved in my favor :-) Shame on Verizon.  You had an opportunity to honor your loyal customer and you failed.
    Worse, this created a snowball effect of further charges.  Shame on Verizon. Because the account was considered "paid in full", it automatically turned my account back on. When I realized this, I called in and said TURN THEM BACK OFF WITHOUT BILLING!!!  They turned them off.  Good job Verizon!
    I called again, to be absolutely certain the account was turned off 'without billing'.  I was assured they were.  I had also asked to ensure there would be no disconnect/reconnect fees.  I was assured.  Good job Verizon!  (I thought...)
    Just got my bill.  It should show $563 (because when I was credited back, it was the entire amount; instead of minus the intended amount of $63).
    The bill shows $851.24.  Shame on Verizon!!!!
    I have spent many hours on the phone with Verizon.  I have explained dozens of times, to dozens of representatives.  I have been transferred over and over, disconnected over and over.  Spoken with representatives, who transferred to supervisors, who eventually one transferred to her manager.  The manager stated she has zero power over her supervisors- that if the supervisor wont credit $, that her hands are tied.  I have made 6 calls to Verizon since 7:30 this morning, which means I was disconnected 4 times just today.  There were 7 calls yesterday, I believe all of those were disconnected as well.  I was not yelling or abusive to the staff-- the disconnects occurred during lengthy holds during transfers.
    FINALLY, I was connected to JUST A REP who actually took care of me!!!!  Out of the $280, I still have $45 left in incorrect charges.  I was so relieved to finally get so much removed that I accepted gratefully.  I believe the other $45 should also be removed, but I need to rest.  Verizon, you really need to give your representatives more power, and more understanding of people-- I have paid thousands of dollars to your company over 11 years.  Is it really better business sense to anger a customer of 11 years at approx. $275 per month than to continue a positive relationship with them and give them back what they believe is theirs-- $280 of incorrect charging???  Is $280 'once' more important than $275 'monthly'?   You need to look at the big picture.  KUDOS to Andre (removed). That representative rocks and deserves a raise for saving your company a $275 monthly customer!
    To all the rest of your staff-- including and especially to 'Acacia' (removed)-- get a new job-- you serve little purpose to your customers, other than angering us further. Acacia told me that her manager (Marissa) does not deal with customers... but that as Operations Manager, "Marissa" serves other purposes.  Telling your customers that they are at the end of the line speaking with you (Acacia's words) is the WRONG thing to say.  If YOU cannot help them because "your hands are tied", get us to someone who can.  As you can see, I do not give up.  But many do, and perhaps that is why your staff say these things, to get us to stop fighting for what we believe is right.
    If you are a Verizon customer-- do not give up-- stand up and fight for what you believe in.  It is YOUR money-- spend it wisely.  Dont accept yield signs disguised as stop signs.  Yield for the moment, and get back on the road.  YOU are your best advocate--- you can always count on YOU.
    Private info removed as required by the Verizon Wireless Terms of Service
    Message edited by: Admin Moderator

    The charges occurred when the account was automatically re-activated due to the over-riding of my payment amount online.  I had a pmt arrangement to pay $63 that week, but the system over-rode and took out the entire balance due.  About gave me a heart attack. When the account was fully paid, its an automatic process to re-activate the account.  I have no idea my phones were back on until my daughter said a text and phone call came through.  I called Verizon to ask what happened, and asked that they shut them back off for me. But that process accumulated more charges of $15 per line to reactivate and then again to suspend services again.  Then they charged an NSF fee for my bank taking back the funds that their system overrode from $63 to $563.  If it had withdrawn the amount I had inputted, there would be no funds to pull back.  The charges were ridiculous... fee after fee after fee resulted from the over-riding glitch in the system.  I dont remember all of the fees, but they added up FAST!  All were a result of paying the account online, with them over-riding the payment amount.

  • How can I create a slideshow that depicts only a version of a photo rather than the original? Since the original and new versions are saved together, the aperture slideshow often choices the original rather than the desired version to display/

    How can I create a slideshow that depicts only a version of a photo rather than the original?   Since the original and new versions are saved together, the aperture slideshow often choices the original rather than the desired version to display.

    There are two things we use the name "Slideshow" for in Aperture:  a Slideshow Album, used for making Slideshows, and the Slideshow that is made.  (Imho, it is a design mistake to not call the containers used to create Slideshows, Books, etc., "Albums".)
    The Slideshow will use the Album Pick from any Stack.  A good way to use Aperture is to promote the Image you want to regularly use (such as, for example, a Version with adjustments) to the top of the Stack.  This makes it the Stack Pick, and will be the default Album Pick.  If you haven't done that, you can still change the Album Pick for any Stack in a Slideshow Album.  Expand your Stack(s), select the Image in each Stack that you want to be the Album Pick (and thus shown in the Slideshow), and "Stacks➞Set Album Pick".  (Note the keyboard shortcut; there is also a Toolbar icon for this.)  The change is immediate.  The Slideshow will always show the Album Pick (or, if there is not one, the Stack Pick) for every Stack in your Slideshow Album.

  • IPhone 4s 6.1.3 problems with 3g,In and Outgoing Calls

    Hi Everybody!
    I got a factory unlocked (originally was Vodafon locked) iPhone 4s with firmware 6.1.3.When I insert my sim (Hungarian Telenor) when only EDGE is on it founds the signal and seems like everything is working.After a few hours or sometimes even a day passes by a phone stays on full signal with Carrier logo and Edge on, but my friends reporting that they cant call me(like im offline) and i cant make calls either.The interresting stuff is that the Edge connection is fully working during that im offline for my friends via Calls and i can send and recieve imessages and viber messages.
    When i switch 3g on it disconnects from service drops the EDGE and never finds the way back and stays 'searching' or 'no service' at all..
    I thought that its my Carrier's fault so i went to spoke with them and tried 5different micro Sims( cause i wrote that 4s-s are sensitive to SIM card types).. this thing not worked either,
    Then i tried the phone with a T-mobile SIM card.. it does the same..connects to the services,but with 3g switched on not finding service..so totally like with my sim.
    Here Comes the bumm... i Tried the phone with vodafone sim and everything works.. simple connectivity to 3g with full internet usage,can make and recieve calls...I spoked with all of the Carriers and also Apple and no body can give me nothing..the phone is off varranty so changed to a new one isnt an option..
    Anybody? Something? im beginning to give up .. please help if you can..Thanks!!
    ps.:i restored over 20times,reset network settings,switch off and on automatic setting time.. every little possible things that people wrote on forums before..

    neverstop wrote:
    1. Settings > General > About - Carrier sais Carrier 14.0 when i restore and startup with my Telenor  sim.. ..
    1. In order
    2. ...... everyone is pointing on the other and i cant do anything about it..just the whole 3g/call failed stuff is bothering me...
    2. It appears configuration issue. I use three iPhones (in my family) on four unsupported carriers. Never had any problem except on one. Outgoing calles to one particular party failed. Set right by Carrier.
    3. Is there something like the Unlock process was not fully succesfull...
    3. Never heard. It is digital : Yes or No. In the instant case, unlock is successful.
    Download firmware afresh via iTunes or from here iPhone4,1_6.1.3_10B329_Restore.ipsw
    and save. Insert Telenor SIM in the iPhone. Backup. Option+Restore (Mac) Shift+Restore (PC) pointing to saved firmware. Reject Carrier updates, if any offered by iTunes. Setup as New.
    Observe.

  • Issue with transferring calls to VM for the correct DN Unity Connection 9.1.2

    Hi all
    I have been facing an issue with a Unity Connection Server v9.1.2. Every time an internal extension (assigned to VM profile and to Unity as a user) which is configured to be transferred to VM after 20 sec or so NoAN,is called , Unity treats the call as the extension of the calling party and not the called party. Furthermore , I dont know if this has any relation with the problem I am facing but when I check the voicemail port status in RTMT its seems like that regardless it is a direct call to the Unity from an extension (dial the pilot number or press the messages button on the IP phone) or a redirected call from an extension to Unity due to NoAN configuration, the Reason is Direct and the caller party number is always the extension initiated the call and not the one redirected to the Unity (second case).
    I have changed the Use Last (Rather than First) Redirecting Number for Routing Incoming Call  Unity parameter in the
    System Settings > Advanced >Conversations -> checked   and
    Redirecting Diversion Header Delivery - Outbound CUCM parameter ->checked
    in the SIP Trunk configuration used for the integraton of the CUCM with Unity but none of those seem to address this issue. Is there any guidelines you can give me to overcome this issue?
    The servers I am using are
    CUCM v9.1.2 BE
    CUC    v9.1.2 BE
    Thank You in Advance

    Hello again,
    The Voice Mail Box Mask was blank before. However I tried XXXX (I use 4-digit extension for the VM pilot) but this did not seem to fix anything to the system....Same situation as before. Any more suggestions?
    Thank you

  • AutoAttendant not transferring calls in CUE 8.6 to CME 9.1

    **Issue is calls are not transferring once extension or directory is pressed on the phone.
    I upgraded our 2811 CME 7.1/CUE 7.0 router to 2911 15.2 CME 9.1/CUE8.6.  It has CME and V/k9 license enabled.  I uploaded the configuration used on the 2811 to the 2911.  I added the ip addresses in the ip trusted list.  Calls come in and out if I point the translation list to the phone and not to the auto attendant pilot number.  Incase if it was toll fraud issue I disabled it but still a no go.
    Everything worked fine on the 2811.  I can't understand why it would not work on the 2911 15.2.  Has anyone had any issues when upgrading from 12.4 to 15.x with auto attendant not transferring calls?
    I ran a trace on the Cue when placed a call to extension 114:
    20.10.10.1- CME  interface address
    20.10.10.5- CUE interface address
    659 09/12 11:43:39.418 ACCN SIPS 0 Call.transferFailed(114, RESOURCE_NOT_ACKNOWLEDGING) SIPCallContact[id=33,type=Cisco SIP Call,implId=5738D3Dse-20-10-10-5# [email protected],active=true,state=CALL_ANSWERED,inbound=true,handled=false,locale=en_US

    Ok I'm starting to think its a dtmf issue. I checked to see if I call from internal to the AA and dial an extension if it works but the same issue.  I ran the debug voip ccapi inout and I see consume mask is not set.  What would that indicate?  Could that be the problem?
    This is right when I dialed extension 114
    2811-TEST#
    001288: Sep 16 14:59:22.870: //55/D62BA3D180C8/CCAPI/cc_api_call_digit_begin:
       Consume mask is not set. Relaying Digit 1 to dstCallId 0x38
    001289: Sep 16 14:59:22.870: //55/D62BA3D180C8/CCAPI/cc_relay_digit_begin_for_3way_conference:
       Check DTMF relay digit begin for 3way conf
    001290: Sep 16 14:59:22.870: //55/D62BA3D180C8/CCAPI/cc_api_call_digit_end:
       Consume mask is not set. Relaying Digit 1 to dstCallId 0x38
    001291: Sep 16 14:59:22.870: //55/D62BA3D180C8/CCAPI/cc_relay_digit_end_for_3way_conference:
       Check DTMF relay digit end for 3way conf
    001292: Sep 16 14:59:23.194: //55/D62BA3D180C8/CCAPI/cc_api_call_digit_begin:
       Consume mask is not set. Relaying Digit 1 to dstCallId 0x38
    001293: Sep 16 14:59:23.194: //55/D62BA3D180C8/CCAPI/cc_relay_digit_begin_for_3way_conference:
       Check DTMF relay digit begin for 3way conf
    001294: Sep 16 14:59:23.194: //55/D62BA3D180C8/CCAPI/cc_api_call_digit_end:
       Consume mask is not set. Relaying Digit 1 to dstCallId 0x38
    001295: Sep 16 14:59:23.198: //55/D62BA3D180C8/CCAPI/cc_relay_digit_end_for_3way_conference:
       Check DTMF relay digit end for 3way conf
    001296: Sep 16 14:59:23.614: //55/D62BA3D180C8/CCAPI/cc_api_call_digit_begin:
       Consume mask is not set. Relaying Digit 4 to dstCallId 0x38
    2811-TEST#
    001297: Sep 16 14:59:23.614: //55/D62BA3D180C8/CCAPI/cc_relay_digit_begin_for_3way_conference:
       Check DTMF relay digit begin for 3way conf
    001298: Sep 16 14:59:23.618: //55/D62BA3D180C8/CCAPI/cc_api_call_digit_end:
       Consume mask is not set. Relaying Digit 4 to dstCallId 0x38
    001299: Sep 16 14:59:23.618: //55/D62BA3D180C8/CCAPI/cc_relay_digit_end_for_3way_conference:
       Check DTMF relay digit end for 3way conf
    2811-TEST#
    At this point theres silence on the phone I see this message:
    2811-TEST#
    001300: Sep 16 14:59:28.914: //55/D62BA3D180C8/CCAPI/ccGenerateToneInfo:
       Stop Tone On Digit=FALSE, Tone=Null,
       Tone Direction=Sum Network, Params=0x0, Call Id=55
    001301: Sep 16 14:59:28.918: //56/D62BA3D180C8/CCAPI/cc_api_call_feature:
       Feature Type=50, Interface=0x49FC2B80, Call Id=56
    2811-TEST#
    2811-TEST#
    At this point I get the message "the phone number you are trying to reach" then the call disconnects
    2811-TEST#
    001242: Sep 16 14:48:57.719: %VOICE_IEC-3-GW: SIP: Internal Error (ACK wait timeout): IEC=1.1.129.7.67.0 on callID 52 GUID=5D21AC143CE711E480BCEEC6B624839
    Also I checked show voice iec description:
    2811-TEST#show voice iec description 1.1.129.7.67.0
        IEC Version: 1
        Entity: 1 (Gateway)
        Category: 129 (Call setup timeout)
        Subsystem: 7 (SIP)
        Error: 67 (ACK wait timeout)
        Diagnostic Code: 0
    2811-TEST#

  • CTI OS desktop client freezes after release of transferred call

    Using CTI OS desktop v7.5(9), UCCE 7.5(9), Endpoint is CIPC 8.6.3 on CUCM 7.1.3
    ACD call received by Agent 1 on ext 1111
    Agent 1 transfers to 1112
    Agent 2 answers transferred call on 1112 using answer call button.
    Agent 2 disconnects using Release Call button on CTI OS desktop
    Call disconnects but stays in grid with status 'Talking' and buttons on CTI OS desktop become unresponsive. CIPC is fully usable independently.
    Agent 2 can reset by killing the CTIOS Desktop process and restarting.
    This condition ONLY occurs as the result of an inbound transfer to Agent 2. It does not appear to happen when a call is transferred to Agent 1 in a similar scenario (Agent 1 is on a 7942)
    Any thoughts as to why this occurs?
    Thanks so much for any assistance!                 

    Hi,
    looks like for some reason the CIPC does not informs the CUCM about the call released event. Or it does, it's only the JTAPI gateway that misses it.
    Did you try upgrading/downgrading the firmware of the CUPC?
    Also, I am not quite sure that CIPC 8.x is supported. It might be, but it certainly is not on the list:
    http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/Unified_CCE_Software_Compatibility_Matrix_for_ALL_7.x_Releases
    G.

  • Re: Forte and OrbixWeb call-back

    We have created a business process manager (BPM) layer between our client GUI
    and business model objects that supports Java call-in/call-out. This enables
    switching out the Forte windows with Java windows for a web solution with
    minimal code re-write.
    We were able to get most functionality to work as per our design, which
    included registering a call back function from a Java GUI in the BPM, but had
    to make some sacrifices due to a Forte bug, at least under 3.0.D. We turned
    in case #38434, detailing errors when we tried to fire a callback method with
    parameters, example below ("callback" was the Java object passed in.)
    method TestIIOPBackend.FireCallback(input message: Framework.string)
    begin
    if callback != nil then
    task.part.logmgr.putline('Firing callback');
    //WORKS
    callback.CallMe();
    //ERROR!
    callback.CallMeString(message);
    else
    task.part.logmgr.putline('Callback not set');
    end if;
    end method;
    This may have been fixed in 3.0.F, we found a way to work around it in our
    design and haven't investigated since.
    -DFR
    Ngai* Stuart <[email protected]> on 01/20/98 09:14:28 AM
    To: '[email protected]' <[email protected]> @ INTERNET
    cc:
    Subject: Forte and OrbixWeb call-back
    Has anyone actually tried the tech note 11153 "Java call-in/call-out and
    Forte
    Anchored Objects"? I'm trying to verify the callback mechanism from
    Forte to
    an IIOP Java client. Thanks.
    <<< Stuart Ngai (416)359-4306 [email protected] >>>
    ------ Message Header Follows ------
    Received: from pebble.SageIT.com by notes.bsginc.com
    (PostalUnion/SMTP(tm) v2.1.9c for Windows NT(tm))
    id AA-1998Jan20.101336.1771.787915; Tue, 20 Jan 1998 10:13:36 -0600
    Received: (from sync@localhost) by pebble.SageIT.com (8.6.10/8.6.9) id HAA03868
    for forte-users-outgoing; Tue, 20 Jan 1998 07:25:41 -0800
    Received: (from uucp@localhost) by pebble.SageIT.com (8.6.10/8.6.9) id HAA03862
    for <[email protected]>; Tue, 20 Jan 1998 07:25:39 -0800
    Received: from keeper.nesbittburns.ca(192.139.71.50) by pebble.sagesoln.com via
    smap (V2.0)
    id xma003860; Tue, 20 Jan 98 07:25:19 -0800
    Received: from NesbittBurns.ca (tds223.nesbittburns.ca) by
    keeper.NesbittBurns.ca (4.1/SMI-4.1)
    id AA22591; Tue, 20 Jan 98 10:23:47 EST
    Received: from nbtormail02.nesbittburns.ca by NesbittBurns.ca (5.x/SMI-SVR4)
    id AA12961; Tue, 20 Jan 1998 10:26:54 -0500
    Received: by nbtormail02.nesbittburns.ca with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Server
    Internet Mail Connector Version 4.0.995.52)
    id <[email protected]>; Tue, 20 Jan 1998
    10:27:52
    -0500
    Message-Id:
    <c=CA%a=_%p=Nesbitt_Burns_In%[email protected]>
    From: "Ngai, Stuart" <[email protected]>
    To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
    Subject: Forte and OrbixWeb call-back
    Date: Tue, 20 Jan 1998 10:27:39 -0500
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Exchange Server Internet Mail Connector Version 4.0.995.52
    Mime-Version: 1.0
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    Sender: [email protected]
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: "Ngai, Stuart" <[email protected]>

    Peggy,
    1) Do you have experience with PowerBuilder and Forte' applications running at
    the same time on the same (laptop) computer? Here I'm thinking
    about any potential resource constraints? Memory Requirements?As log as you are using Win95 or NT you should not be concerned about WIN-resources. Memory depends more on what your 2 tier PB application requires than what your Fort&eacute; would require.
    Cheers,
    Troels
    Lindhard Fort&eacute; Solutions
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Peggy Lynn Adrian [SMTP:[email protected]]
    Sent: Thursday, January 15, 1998 10:31 PM
    To: [email protected]
    Subject: Forte and Powerbuilder Experience Needed
    I sent this query to Forte support but maybe someone out there can help me
    with practical experience
    with the following?
    ---------------------- Forwarded by Peggy Lynn Adrian/AM/LLY on 01/15/98 04:30
    PM ---------------------------
    Peggy Lynn Adrian
    01/14/98 03:55 PM
    To: [email protected]
    cc: Peggy Lynn Adrian/AM/LLY@Lilly
    Subject: Forte and Powerbuilder Experience Needed
    1) Do you have experience with PowerBuilder and Forte' applications running at
    the same time on the same (laptop) computer? Here I'm thinking
    about any potential resource constraints? Memory Requirements?
    2) Can PowerBuilder and Forte' applications call and interact with one
    another?
    The Forte' application will need to interact with the PowerBuilder application
    to pull out information maintained by the PB application.

Maybe you are looking for

  • 10.5.8 update is faulty - it jammed up my new imac

    Everything was fine before the 10.5.8 update. My macbook and mac air are running great on 10.5.7 - I tried everything, disk utility, zapping pram and nvram and the machine is still slow on all fronts. It takes roughly 20 minutes to reboot, hanging fo

  • Issues in IDOC_XML_FILE function module in ECC5.0

    Hi, I used the function module IDOC_XML_FILE to upload and convert XML file from the application server to idoc. It was working fine in 4.6C. Howeverm when we recently upgraded to ECC5.0, the version of this function module changed. And we are facing

  • Game constantly shut because of "problem"

    I purchased a copy of the game Portal 2 yesterday. Once I relized that it wouldn't play at full speed on my Pavillion 4G,  I quickly switched a few of the video options in the game,  for the rest of the day, it ran just fine. I was playing the game t

  • Javascript folder locations

    Hi. I'm currently working on a short reference documentation for a client. This documentation has to instruct the client on how to place a trusted function script in the user javascript library. My client works in Acrobat 8.0 standard and Acrobat 7.0

  • I get this error 4280 when burning

    then it cancels my disc and i dont know whats wrong. help please! cd diagnostics Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition Service Pack 2 (Build 2600) INTEL_ D945GNT_ iTunes 7.0.1.8 CD Driver 2.0.6.0 CD Driver DLL 2.0.6.0 UpperFilters: NTIDrvr (1.0.0.5), GEA