Subsequent settlement -- Rebate to Vendor

Hi friends,
Thanks for your input for the following issue ahead!
I created an agreement which type is material rebates. Then I ticked the vendors selection "subsequent settlement" and "... configure index" in the vendor master record. Then I run the report "RMEBEIN3" to compile vendor document index. Then I tried to run the report "RWMBON08" to get business volume data, but can't. I created the condition for agreement by "A001" and "A002". And also I check the table "S111" where having some lines for the last period of "2007/12" with the right vendor and material.
The eror message:
It.No. Message     Error Text
       MN    I 381 No update data exists for condition record
       MN    I 531 No subsequent business volume was determined for arrangement 138,
How to check all the other settings?
I tried to add new PO, and then I can get Business Volume, but I can get ones of last year retrospectively!!!
Bruce
Edited by: Bruce Hu on Jan 8, 2008 8:26 AM
Edited by: Bruce Hu on Jan 9, 2008 5:47 AM

You can follow the best practices to configure it at first.
Look for G84 in http://help.sap.com/bp_blv1600/BL_ES/html/index.htm
The procedure is to create the agreement with meb1, adjust the volume with meb4 and in case you need to update volume backwards it is the Meba transaction.
send the news after having checked your configuration with best practices.

Similar Messages

Subsequent settlement in MM(Vendor rebate)

I'm using subsequent settlement(rebate) on vendor side with partial settlement with the help of settlement calendar. However during vendor rebate maintenance in step of condition maintenance, I maintained condition rate(rebate discount) and scales on main condition. However system only copied automatically condition rate at main condition to period-specific condition not for scales. So I had to do it manually by copying scales at main condition to individual period-specific conditions. It's quite a tough life to do this. Could anyone give me some light to make life better for example any missing configuration or any enhancement.
Home

Hi,
Use BADI to create rebate agreement in MM.You can explore following BAdI.
These BAdI are applicable for MM & SD applications:
(a) SD_BONUS_CREDIT_NOTE BAdI for Rebate Credit Memo Requirements
(b) SD_COND_DETAIL Enhancement in Condition Detail Screen
(c) SD_COND_SAVE_A Save condition application A, E
I hopr this will help you out. Thanking you.

Subsequent settlement-Rebates

Hi experts,
I want to generate a report where,BI has to raise a alert if there is a shortage of certain purchase amount to get the rebate.(for a set of conditions)
I want to know by using which data source i can load data related to rebares .
And what are the restrictions or conditions i hve to use ,to generate the above mentioned scenario.
Thanks & regards,
Lalitha

Hi,
Yean i knw this. But you are actually not understanding the process.
We dont want to do this whole process of calculating stock on hand, creating rebate, changing MAP to be done one by one manually.
We just want an inetgrated approach where we just key in the new price and say its a vendor price change.. the system automatically calculates the qty on hand, calculates the rebate amount and cretaes a credit memo and also adjusts the moving avg price.
We are curretly doing the whole process manually as i had described... but we are looking for something better.
Cheers
Kanica

Subsequent settlement for multiple material

Hi, everyone,
I have a requirement for subsequent settlement.
The vendor will rebate a fixed amount when the total purchasing QTY more than 100,000 pcs for material A, plus material B, plus material C.
When I create the sebsequent settlement, I can only input the material A, B, C one by one, and the system calculate the business volumn based on the indivdual material also.
The key requirement is the rebate was based on the TOTAL QTY of material A, B, C.
Would you please give me a help? Should I use the settle group in info record? Less document for it.
Thanks!
Tony

Hi ,
rather than going material rebate while selecting rebate arrangement type select grp rebate or rebate to do this proces
regards

Subsequent Settlement - without periodic condition and with calendar

Hey everyone,
I hope you can help me with my issue. We are trying to use the subsequent settlement process for vendor rebate arrangements. We want to use the functionality to extend the rebate arrangement but we don't want to use periodic conditions. The goal is to only make a final settlement each year.
Is this even possible? If I maintain the rebate type and set an arrangement calendar I have to maintain the periodic calendar as well. If I then settle the document, there will always be an empty position in the vendor billing document for the partial setting.
At the moment both calendars are empty and we have to create a complete new rebate arrangement every year.
Thanks and regards
Kai

You can follow the best practices to configure it at first.
Look for G84 in http://help.sap.com/bp_blv1600/BL_ES/html/index.htm
The procedure is to create the agreement with meb1, adjust the volume with meb4 and in case you need to update volume backwards it is the Meba transaction.
send the news after having checked your configuration with best practices.

Subsequent settlement - MM vendor rebate

Dear all,
One of my user-department is going to use the vendor rebate (i.e. subsequent settlement) as there is such business incentive given by a couple of vendor since last year and we would like to capture this in the system to take advantage on this.
However, I would like to check with you on your experience with regards to what kinds of business requirement (i.e. question) to enquire from the business? basically, how to start on the requirement gathering with regards to this Vendor rebate? what kind of question to ask, what are important that must know, staffs like that?
thanks.
MM_user

Dear all,
Does anyone have experince in this area to know my question? thanks.
Tuffy

Rebate- Subsequent Settlement

I am configuring subsequent settlement scenario. I want to know is there a provision to display rebate value in PO against condition type ( e.g if rebate condition type is A001 can rebate value be displayed against and is PO value calculated considering the rebate ? ) . Currently I can see " 0" against the condition type.

HI,
Please chk in the config....
SPRO>MM->purchasing-->Partner Determination->Partner setting in Rebate Arrangement--->Define partner schemas for Rebate..
Here please check the partner function "PI" is made mandatory...
You can main the Partner function "PI" in the agreement itself...
Goto t-code MEB2 & enter the agreement no, inside click the icon "Agreement Partner" or (Ctrl+F2) and maintain the partner function PI..
find below link
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_40b/helpdata/en/12/08595a470311d1894a0000e8323352/content.htm
Regards
Raj
Edited by: R.Rasumalla on Oct 21, 2011 6:37 PM
Moderator message:
Warning: Copy-pasted answer from someone else's work:
Issue in Vendor Rebate Settlement (ECC 6.0)
Please refrain from doing such things in the future. Please also don't do linkfarming.
Points will be removed.
Edited by: Csaba Szommer on Oct 23, 2011 7:54 PM

Subsequent settlement with different volumes (scale and rebate)

Hi
A nice question for you all.
In subsequent settlement I want to do the following:
Interval scales:
>$100.000 -> 1% rebate
>$450.000 -> 2% rebate
>$600.000 -> 3% rebate
(this is easy)
When I want to determine the business volume I want to differentiate between:
- trucks
- cars
Based on the following numbers:
Annual business volume for trucks: $200.000
Annual business volume for cars: $300.000
Total volume: $500.000
This means the rebate wil fall in the 2% interval.
BUT.... the rebate is ONLY for cars and NOT for trucks.
--> 2% of 300.000 = $6.000
How to do this?
Regards,
Arno

Sangeeta,
What do you think of the following:
Build up business volume for every delivery of the supplier and also for the trucks.
I will make two rebates:
For the total volume:
>$100.000 -> -1% rebate
>$450.000 -> -2% rebate
>$600.000 -> -3% rebate
For the trucks volume:
>$100.000 -> +1% rebate
>$450.000 -> +2% rebate
>$600.000 -> +3% rebate
Since the trucks will be in the +1% rate and the total volume will be in the 2% rate I have to change the interval for the scales condition manually in trx MEU2, but not the price condition. After the comparisation is finished both are in the +/- 2% scale and I can settle the agreement.
Only one manual step needed, sounds as a fine solution, do you agree?

Rebates (Subsequent settlement) settling to Debtor?

Hi,
I currently am trying to configure the MM Subsequent settlement process.
The business does not want to create a credit item on the suppliers account and would prefer to settle the rebate back to the suppliers customer account with us. Is this possible? If so what configuration steps do I need to do and what risks are you aware of doing it this way?
Regards
Alan

You can follow the best practices to configure it at first.
Look for G84 in http://help.sap.com/bp_blv1600/BL_ES/html/index.htm
The procedure is to create the agreement with meb1, adjust the volume with meb4 and in case you need to update volume backwards it is the Meba transaction.
send the news after having checked your configuration with best practices.

Subsequent Settlement

Hi friends,
Please assist here. I have set the settlement type to "debit-side settlement accounting purchase org. level" on the Settlement subscreen of the arrangement type details screen.
This is because i want to award an invoice to vendors.
Now for some reason the arrangement type does now appear from the drop down list when i want to create a rebate argreement via MEB1.
I have also maintained the the BM1 & BM3 document types on the debit-site settlement subscreen.
Can anybody assist me and explain what could be the potential error.
your help will be much appriciated.

Hi,
credit-side settlement works with vendor billing. This is a function from the MM application.
Debit-side settlement works with customer billing, which is a function of the SD application. In this case the subsequent settlement functionality uses customer billing documents to create the settlement.
Please check the note 153694 - Credit-side or debit-side settlement type
Regards,
Edit

Subsequent settlement based on sold volume from the stores

Hello sirs,
We have a requirement that is killing me.
We need to do the subsequent settlement based on the sold volume out from a group of stores instead of the volume bought to the vendor. We need to update the statistics for the purpouse of subsequent settlement in the moment of a sales order not in the purchase order, goods receipt or invoice verification (the standard points).
There is any standard way to do this?
Thank you so much for helping me.
Best regards
Pedro

Hi Pedro,
You can send material to STORES by Sales Order as well as Stock Transport Order from DC.
If you are following STO process, then subsequent settlement will not come in to Picture.
If you are sending materials to Stores by Sales Order, then you can have Subsequent Settlement based on Volume of Business or Qty.
This can be achieved by configuring Rebate Agreement in normal Sales Cycle.
Regards,
Selvakumar. M

Subsequent settlement "Urgent"

Hi folks ,
a). Can anyone explain subsequent settlement process in brief and how its done in SAP?
b). Also please explain business volume ??.
whats business volume comparison ?
Points for helpful answers
Regards
Kumar

Dear Kumar,
Subsequent settlement is big subject in SAP , however I will give you brief idea.
Subsequent settlement is normally done in following ways
1) Subsequent Debit or Credit.
a) This is done in case there is change in total value of invoice of PO item ( Value difference)
b) Total Invoice Qty remain unchanged
c) Only value base transaction takes place & not Qty based
d) if the cost are incurred - Enter subsequent Debit in MIRO screen
e) If credit memo is received from vendor enter subsequent credit in MIRO
f) System suggest only entire invoice Qty & not value
g)Maximum Qty that can be debited / credited is less or equal to invoiced amount.
h)cannot refer to particular invoice
i) List separately in PO history
J) If Qty is already delivered thae system makes offset entry in stock A/c , Price difference or consumption account as applicable
k) If qty is not red. then system makes offset entry in GRIR A/C & when good are delivered system post amount to respective stock Accounts.
2) Invoice Reduction
a)If invoice shows a variance when compared to expected Qty or expected value & you don't want to accept difference you can reduce invoice.
b) There is special display in item list for invoice reduction in MIRO
c) When you post reduction invoice document two Accounting documents are generated one actual value & qty as per invoice posting & another one is credit memo for difference between actual Qty
I hope above explanation will give you brief idea how it works.
If useful please reward points,
Vivek Maitra

Subsequent debit for a vendor before invoice??? (URGENT!!!!!)

hi all,
i want to post subsequent debit for a vendor before invoice. but the system is giving a message "The quantity to be debited/credited cannot be any greater than the quantity invoiced so far."
can anybody tell me how to post subsequent debit before posting the invoice (i haven't got the vendor invoice yet but i must pay the freight cost).

Hi,
Subsequent debit : Rarely, you receive from your vendors invoices or credit memos that refer to transactions that have already been invoiced. Your company wants to use subsequent debits/credits to process these documents. A subsequent debit/credit changes the total invoice value only of a purchase order item but the total invoice quantity remains unchanged.
The processes are:
1) Subsequent credit or even subsequent debit is done when total VALUE" of invoice is changed.
2) Total invoice Quantity is remained same.
3) Only value based transaction takes place & not quantity base.
4) If credit memo is received from memo then subsequent credit is done in MIRO.
For example vendor has submitted invoice of 100 Qty for Rs 1000 & we have posted the invoice & subsequently he realized that he has invoice for higher price i.e. it should have been actually 900 Rs as against Rs 1000 .In this case he will send a credit memo of Rs 100 for which we will be doing subsequent credit.
5) This is done for PO items if an invoice is already posted
6) cannot refer to particular invoice
7) Listed separately in PO history
8) In PO total values is updated but not Quantity.
For ur case you can pay to Vendor(freight cost ) by selecting Planned Delivery Cost instead of Goods/Services items in MIRO T.Code
Regards,
Biju K

Shipment Cost settlement to multiple vendors

Hi team,
When we are calculating shipment cost, with reference to outbound shipments, we have to get the multiple vendors like freight cost settlement to one vendor and insurance will be to the other vendor.
How do we need to map this requirement? We are using SD route.
Regards
Venkat Ramana

Hi Venkat,
If different service agents exist in the shipment cost documents, a
corresponding number of condition lines (with value 0) must be
specified in the purchase order item. These can always belong to the
same condition type (in schema 'Manual') or also to different
condition types (not 'Manual'):
a) Manual condition lines: If the condition type in the schema of
    the purchase order is marked as 'manual', the condition type must
    be created (with value 0) in the purchase order item before the
    goods receipt. If delivery costs are expected from different
    service agents, several non-valuated entries must be generated
    for this condition type. If more condition lines exist than
    required, these are then no longer taken into account. If
    condition lines are missing, the last service agents are not
    settled.
    - Advantage: You only have to define one condition type for the
    delivery costs.
    - Disadvantage: Each purchase order must be processed manually
    before the goods receipt.
b) Automatic condition lines: If the condition lines are to be
    generated automatically for the delivery costs (the condition
    type is not flagged as 'Manual' in the schema), the schema must
    have enough condition types to settle several service agents. If
    more condition lines exist than required, these are then no
    longer taken into account. If condition lines are missing, the
    last service agents are not settled.
    - Advantage: The goods receipt can be carried out without manual
    preparation beforehand in the purchase order.
    - Disadvantage: You must define identical condition types with different names.
Regards, David

Assign company code for subsequent settlement at Plany level

Hi
I am configuring "MM Subsequent settlement" in IMG
In the step - Assign company code for subsequent settlement at Plany level" , i can not add my purchasing organisation and assign to company code. There is no option for "New entry" in the change mode.
Could you please suggest?
Best regards
Vijay

Hi,
Assignment is only possible or necessary for purchasing organizations to which a company code is not assigned.
SAM

Subsequent settlement -- Rebate to Vendor

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for