Subsequent settlement  "Urgent"

Hi folks ,
a). Can anyone explain subsequent settlement process  in brief and how its done in SAP?
b). Also please explain business volume ??.
whats business volume comparison ?
Points for helpful answers
Regards
Kumar

Dear Kumar,
Subsequent settlement is big subject in SAP , however I will give you brief idea.
Subsequent settlement is normally done in following ways
1) Subsequent Debit  or Credit.
a) This is done in case there is change in total value of invoice of PO item ( Value difference)
b) Total Invoice Qty remain unchanged
c) Only value base transaction takes place & not Qty based
d) if the cost are incurred - Enter subsequent Debit in MIRO screen
e) If credit memo is received from vendor enter subsequent credit in MIRO
f) System suggest only entire invoice Qty & not value
g)Maximum Qty that can be debited / credited is less or equal to invoiced amount.
h)cannot refer to particular invoice
i) List separately in PO history
J) If Qty is already delivered thae system makes offset entry in stock A/c , Price difference or consumption account as applicable
k) If qty is not red. then system makes offset entry in GRIR A/C & when good are delivered system post amount to respective stock Accounts.
2) Invoice Reduction
a)If invoice shows a variance when compared to expected Qty or expected value & you don't want to accept difference you can reduce invoice.
b) There is special display in item list for invoice reduction in MIRO
c) When you post reduction invoice document two Accounting documents are generated one actual value & qty as per invoice posting & another one is credit memo for difference between actual Qty
I hope above explanation will give you brief idea how it works.
If useful please reward points,
Vivek Maitra

Similar Messages

  • Subsequent Settlement

    Hi friends,
    Please assist here. I have set the settlement type to "debit-side settlement accounting purchase org. level" on the Settlement subscreen of the arrangement type details screen.
    This is because i want to award an invoice to vendors.
    Now for some reason the arrangement type does now appear from the drop down list when i want to create a rebate argreement via MEB1.
    I have also maintained the the BM1 & BM3 document types on the debit-site settlement subscreen.
    Can anybody assist me and explain what could be the potential error.
    your help will be much appriciated.

    Hi,
    credit-side settlement works with vendor billing. This is a function from the MM application.
    Debit-side settlement works with customer billing, which is a function of the SD application. In this case the subsequent settlement functionality uses customer billing documents to create the settlement.                                          
    Please check the note 153694 - Credit-side or debit-side settlement type  
    Regards,
    Edit

  • Subsequent settlement - MM vendor rebate

    Dear all,
    One of my user-department is going to use the vendor rebate (i.e. subsequent settlement) as there is such business incentive given by a couple of vendor since last year and we would like to capture this in the system to take advantage on this.
    However, I would like to check with you on your experience with regards to what kinds of business requirement (i.e. question) to enquire from the business? basically, how to start on the requirement gathering with regards to this Vendor rebate? what kind of question to ask, what are important that must know, staffs like that?
    thanks.
    MM_user

    Dear all,
    Does anyone have experince in this area to know my question? thanks.
    Tuffy

  • Subsequent settlement with different volumes (scale and rebate)

    Hi
    A nice question for you all.
    In subsequent settlement I want to do the following:
    Interval scales:
    >$100.000 -> 1% rebate
    >$450.000 -> 2% rebate
    >$600.000 -> 3% rebate
    (this is easy)
    When I want to determine the business volume I want to differentiate between:
    - trucks
    - cars
    Based on the following numbers:
    Annual business volume for trucks: $200.000
    Annual business volume for cars: $300.000
    Total volume: $500.000
    This means the rebate wil fall in the 2% interval.
    BUT.... the rebate is ONLY for cars and NOT for trucks.
    --> 2% of 300.000 = $6.000
    How to do this?
    Regards,
    Arno

    Sangeeta,
    What do you think of the following:
    Build up business volume for every delivery of the supplier and also for the trucks.
    I will make two rebates:
    For the total volume:
    >$100.000 -> -1% rebate
    >$450.000 -> -2% rebate
    >$600.000 -> -3% rebate
    For the trucks volume:
    >$100.000 -> +1% rebate
    >$450.000 -> +2% rebate
    >$600.000 -> +3% rebate
    Since the trucks will be in the +1% rate and the total volume will be in the 2% rate I have to change the interval for the scales condition manually in trx MEU2, but not the price condition. After the comparisation is finished both are in the +/- 2% scale and I can settle the agreement.
    Only one manual step needed, sounds as a fine solution, do you agree?

  • Subsequent settlement for multiple material

    Hi, everyone,
    I have a requirement for subsequent settlement.
    The vendor will rebate a fixed amount when the total purchasing QTY more than 100,000 pcs for material A, plus material  B, plus material C.
    When I create the sebsequent settlement, I can only input the material A, B, C one by one, and the system calculate the business volumn based on the indivdual material also.
    The key requirement is the rebate was based on the TOTAL QTY of material A, B, C.
    Would you please give me a help? Should I use the settle group in info record? Less document for it.
    Thanks!
    Tony

    Hi ,
    rather than going material rebate while selecting rebate arrangement type select grp rebate or rebate to do this proces
    regards

  • Subsequent settlement in MM(Vendor rebate)

    I'm using subsequent settlement(rebate) on vendor side with partial settlement with the help of settlement calendar. However during vendor rebate maintenance in step of condition maintenance, I maintained condition rate(rebate discount) and scales on main condition. However system only copied automatically condition rate at main condition to period-specific condition not for scales. So I had to do it manually by copying scales at main condition to individual period-specific conditions. It's quite a tough life to do this. Could anyone give me some light to make life better for example any missing configuration or any enhancement.
    Home

    Hi,
    Use BADI to create rebate agreement in MM.You can explore following BAdI.
    These BAdI are applicable for MM & SD applications:
    (a) SD_BONUS_CREDIT_NOTE BAdI for Rebate Credit Memo Requirements
    (b) SD_COND_DETAIL Enhancement in Condition Detail Screen
    (c) SD_COND_SAVE_A Save condition application A, E
    I hopr this will help you out. Thanking you.

  • Subsequent settlement -- Rebate to Vendor

    Hi friends,
    Thanks for your input for the following issue ahead!
    I created an agreement which type is material rebates. Then I ticked the vendors selection "subsequent settlement" and "... configure index" in the vendor master record. Then I run the report "RMEBEIN3" to compile vendor document index. Then I tried to run the report "RWMBON08" to get business volume data, but can't. I created the condition for agreement by "A001" and "A002". And also I check the table "S111" where having some lines for the last period of "2007/12" with the right vendor and material.
    The eror message:
    It.No. Message     Error Text
           MN    I 381 No update data exists for condition record
           MN    I 531 No subsequent business volume was determined for arrangement 138,
    How to check all the other settings?
    I tried to add new PO, and then I can get Business Volume, but I can get ones of last year retrospectively!!!
    Bruce
    Edited by: Bruce Hu on Jan 8, 2008 8:26 AM
    Edited by: Bruce Hu on Jan 9, 2008 5:47 AM

    You can follow the best practices to configure it at first.
    Look for G84 in http://help.sap.com/bp_blv1600/BL_ES/html/index.htm
    The procedure is to create the agreement with meb1, adjust the volume with meb4 and in case you need to update volume backwards it is the Meba transaction.
    send the news after having checked your configuration with best practices.

  • Subsequent settlement based on sold volume from the stores

    Hello sirs,
    We have a requirement that is killing me.
    We need to do the subsequent settlement based on the sold volume out from a group of stores instead of the volume bought to the vendor. We need to update the statistics for the purpouse of subsequent settlement in the moment of a sales order not in the purchase order, goods receipt or invoice verification (the standard points).
    There is any standard way to do this?
    Thank you so much for helping me.
    Best regards
    Pedro

    Hi Pedro,
    You can send material to STORES by Sales Order as well as Stock Transport Order from DC.
    If you are following STO process, then subsequent settlement will not come in to Picture.
    If you are sending materials to Stores by Sales Order, then you can have Subsequent Settlement based on Volume of Business or Qty.
    This can be achieved by configuring Rebate Agreement in normal Sales Cycle.
    Regards,
    Selvakumar. M

  • Rebates (Subsequent settlement) settling to Debtor?

    Hi,
    I currently am trying to configure the MM Subsequent settlement process.
    The business does not want to create a credit item on the suppliers account and would prefer to settle the rebate back to the suppliers customer account with us.   Is this possible?  If so what configuration steps do I need to do and what risks are you aware of doing it this way?
    Regards
    Alan

    You can follow the best practices to configure it at first.
    Look for G84 in http://help.sap.com/bp_blv1600/BL_ES/html/index.htm
    The procedure is to create the agreement with meb1, adjust the volume with meb4 and in case you need to update volume backwards it is the Meba transaction.
    send the news after having checked your configuration with best practices.

  • Assign company code for subsequent settlement at Plany level

    Hi
    I am configuring "MM Subsequent settlement" in IMG
    In the step - Assign company code for subsequent settlement at Plany level" , i can not add my purchasing organisation and assign to company code. There is no option for "New entry" in the change mode.
    Could you please suggest?
    Best regards
    Vijay

    Hi,
    Assignment is only possible or necessary for purchasing organizations to which a company code is not assigned.
    SAM

  • Query for the Account Determination of Subsequent Settlement

    Hello,
    No Accouting Documents are created while settlement run on Settlement Date
    Could anyone provide me the Documents for the Configuring the Account Determination for the Subsequent Settlement.
    Regards,
    Kumar Rayudu

    Hi
    Plese refer the help.sap.com or the following link
    http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_02/helpdata/en/12/08595a470311d1894a0000e8323352/frameset.htm
    Regards
    Ramakrishna

  • Subsequent Settlement - without periodic condition and with calendar

    Hey everyone,
    I hope you can help me with my issue. We are trying to use the subsequent settlement process for vendor rebate arrangements. We want to use the functionality to extend the rebate arrangement but we don't want to use periodic conditions. The goal is to only make a final settlement each year.
    Is this even possible? If I maintain the rebate type and set an arrangement calendar I have to maintain the periodic calendar as well. If I then settle the document, there will always be an empty position in the vendor billing document for the partial setting.
    At the moment both calendars are empty and we have to create a complete new rebate arrangement every year.
    Thanks and regards
    Kai

    You can follow the best practices to configure it at first.
    Look for G84 in http://help.sap.com/bp_blv1600/BL_ES/html/index.htm
    The procedure is to create the agreement with meb1, adjust the volume with meb4 and in case you need to update volume backwards it is the Meba transaction.
    send the news after having checked your configuration with best practices.

  • Rebate- Subsequent Settlement

    I am configuring subsequent settlement scenario. I want to know is there a provision to display rebate value in PO against condition type ( e.g if rebate condition type is A001 can rebate value be displayed against  and is PO value calculated considering the  rebate ? ) . Currently I can see " 0" against the condition type.

    HI,
    Please chk in the config....
    SPRO>MM->purchasing-->Partner Determination->Partner setting in Rebate Arrangement--->Define partner schemas for Rebate..
    Here please check the partner function "PI" is made mandatory...
    You can main the Partner function "PI" in the agreement itself...
    Goto t-code MEB2 & enter the agreement no,  inside click the icon "Agreement Partner" or (Ctrl+F2) and maintain the partner function PI..
    find below link
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_40b/helpdata/en/12/08595a470311d1894a0000e8323352/content.htm
    Regards
    Raj
    Edited by: R.Rasumalla on Oct 21, 2011 6:37 PM
    Moderator message:
    Warning: Copy-pasted answer from someone else's work:
    Issue in Vendor Rebate Settlement (ECC 6.0)
    Please refrain from doing such things in the future. Please also don't do linkfarming.
    Points will be removed.
    Edited by: Csaba Szommer on Oct 23, 2011 7:54 PM

  • Interest settlement  urgent

    Hi,
    i have run one security deposit interst calaculation f.26  that process is ok what ever the out put is came thgen i run the batch in put session it s came one entry screen is came in that screen d type , account no posting and dispalyed auto matically i want know this data from where its take .
    Edited by: jyotsna devi on Apr 8, 2008 12:10 PM
    Edited by: jyotsna devi on Apr 8, 2008 12:11 PM

    Dear Kumar,
    Subsequent settlement is big subject in SAP , however I will give you brief idea.
    Subsequent settlement is normally done in following ways
    1) Subsequent Debit  or Credit.
    a) This is done in case there is change in total value of invoice of PO item ( Value difference)
    b) Total Invoice Qty remain unchanged
    c) Only value base transaction takes place & not Qty based
    d) if the cost are incurred - Enter subsequent Debit in MIRO screen
    e) If credit memo is received from vendor enter subsequent credit in MIRO
    f) System suggest only entire invoice Qty & not value
    g)Maximum Qty that can be debited / credited is less or equal to invoiced amount.
    h)cannot refer to particular invoice
    i) List separately in PO history
    J) If Qty is already delivered thae system makes offset entry in stock A/c , Price difference or consumption account as applicable
    k) If qty is not red. then system makes offset entry in GRIR A/C & when good are delivered system post amount to respective stock Accounts.
    2) Invoice Reduction
    a)If invoice shows a variance when compared to expected Qty or expected value & you don't want to accept difference you can reduce invoice.
    b) There is special display in item list for invoice reduction in MIRO
    c) When you post reduction invoice document two Accounting documents are generated one actual value & qty as per invoice posting & another one is credit memo for difference between actual Qty
    I hope above explanation will give you brief idea how it works.
    If useful please reward points,
    Vivek Maitra

  • Error in AUC Settlement (Urgent)

    Hello Every body,
    I got an error while posting the AUC Capitalization in the settlement rule i have given 100% and amount which needs to be capitalized can also be seen in the Asset Explorer ....the error is as follows..
    <u><b>Error:</b></u>
    Line Item reduce the cut-off value by     1.00
    Massage NO: AA632
    Asset affected : 12345
    Diagnosis:
    The book value of the asset is below the cut off value in the amount of 1.00
    Procedure:
    Check your entries for the amount, transaction type and cut-off value specifications, such as memo value, scrap value or cut-off value percentage rate
    <i>Plz through some light regarding this issue</i>...points will be assigned instead of thanks
    Regards
    SM<u></u>

    Hii Jagdish,
    The Cut off Value key is assigned to the Dep key and 5% is assigned to it, But it is line with the Accounting rules and principles I cannot change the same.
    Again this is maintained in the Recieving asset and the error message is showing the Asset affected is the sender asset.
    Pls throw some light.
    Regards
    Surendra Mahajan

Maybe you are looking for

  • Purchase order wise payment details

    Hi , Requirement : Report for Purcahse order wise payment details Is there any report , where we can see purchase order wise payment details

  • WRT54G v7 WAN DHCP client problem

    I've recently started having a strange problem with my WRT54G. Internet access is via a Cable modem and has been working fine for months, and the cable modem works fine so I suspect the problem is with the router. However the router is also working,

  • InDesign CS5 Book to Interactive PDF

    Hi all, Now in InDesign CS5 there is a more convenient option under File > Export... to make interactive PDFs with links, buttons, etc. In exchange, in the traditional PDF Presets export workflow there are some changes, in the dialog box. Now there i

  • How do I create image pushing slide show in Flash?

    Hi. I am wondering if anybody can tell me how to create a picture PUSH. I have three images that I wish to work with. By pushing I mean having an image come in from the left (or right) and place itself on top of the other (or pushing the other out of

  • Since the Gingerbread update on my Droid2 my corporate synch email has stopped working

    I get an error message when it tries to synch.  The last emails I received were on Sept 2nd.  I believe the update happened on the 3rd.  I cant figure out how to fix it.  Nothing has changed from my company's perspective. thanks, Stephanie