2LIS_02_ITM : 0CREATEDON mapping

In the update rules for 2LIS_02_ITM to 0PUR_O01 . 0CREATEDON is mapped to 0ENTRY_DATE ( Date on which the purchasing document was created).
Because of this what is happening is that whenever the document is updated BW is picking up that date or the system date.
Please advice, how I can resolve this.
Thanks

0PUR_O01 does not have 0DOC_DATE? Can I add 0DOC_DATE to the ODS and map this to document date . And leave Created on date to Entry date.
Thanks
Message was edited by: BW BW

Similar Messages

2LIS_02_ITM ROCANCEL mapped to STORNO or RECORDMODE or both

Hello all.
First of all I would like to know the role rocancel plays when mapped to storno and then when mapped to recordmode. Which on eis ideally suggested. Now let me tell you that we are using a custom ods before loading the data up into the cube. The keyfigure 0deliveres and 0CURR_GRQTY are being used as summation.Just a side note, we are using processkey as a keyfield and what ramification does that hold in mapping rocancel to either storno or both storno and recordmode and which one assist in correct delta.
I will really appreciate all your help on this issue.
Thanks in advance!

Hi,
I do not think that there will be any difference if you map ROCANCEL to 0STORNO or 0RECORDMODE.
Both can be used to manage the New/ Change / Deleted records. (We have mapped ROCANCEL -> 0STORNO).
ROCANCEL = 'R' for Deleted Orders/ records.
ROCANCEL = ' ' for New/ Change records. (After image)
ROCALCEL = 'X' for before image
As far as the ProcessKeys are concerned, when a PO is created, it has a Process Key assigned, say for ex. 1.
Now, if you Receipt it, say Goods Receipt, the Process Key changes. (Depending on what has been set in the system)
Similarly, for Invoice Receipt or Goods Return etc, you will have different Process Keys for the same Purchase Order.
Hope this helps.
Regards
Vishal

TRCS 2LIS_02_ITM to 0PUR_C01 Mapping issue 0INV_RC_QTY/VAL

Dear All ,
I have installed the 0pur_c01 cube and its before and after objects successfully. Loaded the data into standard cube. But there is no data into the 0IV_RC_QTY / VAL ( Invoice QTY / VAL ) infoobjects.
There is no mapping from TRCS 2LIS_02_ITM to 0PUR_C01 Cube.
Can you please help me on this. What to map from source to target cube.
Your help highly appreciated.
Best Regards,
Milind.

Hi Milind,
strange.
For me it looks like shown below
Could you try to reinstall this transformation from BI Content?
If still not provided there after reinstall, please let us know the BI Content Release and support package you are using.
Here is the information for the two transformation routines:
0INV_RC_QTY
Source IObj:
- 0BASE_UOM
- 0BWAPPLNM
- 0CPQUAOU
- 0DENOMINTR
- 0NUMERATOR
- 0PO_UNIT
- 0PROCESSKEY
Aggregation: Summation
Routine (unfortunately only in 3.x non ABAP-OO style, you would need to adapt it to 7.x ABAP OO):
* fill the internal table "MONITOR", to make monitor entries
IF ( COMM_STRUCTURE-PROCESSKEY = '023' or
    COMM_STRUCTURE-PROCESSKEY = '003' )
    AND COMM_STRUCTURE-BWAPPLNM EQ 'MM'
    AND COMM_STRUCTURE-CPQUAOU <> 0.
    perFORM QUANTITY_CONVERT
       USING    COMM_STRUCTURE-CPQUAOU
                COMM_STRUCTURE-po_UNIT
                COMM_STRUCTURE-base_uom
                COMM_STRUCTURE-numerator
                COMM_STRUCTURE-denomintr
       CHANGING RESULT.
* if the returncode is not equal zero, the result will not be updated
    RETURNCODE = 0.
else.
    RETURNCODE = 4.
endif.
* if abort is not equal zero, the update process will be canceled
ABORT = 0.
0INV_RC_VAL
Source IObj:
- 0BWAPPLNM
- 0CPPVLC
- 0LOC_CURRCY
- 0PROCESSKEY
Aggregation: Summation
Routine (unfortunately only in 3.x non ABAP-OO style, you would need to adapt it to 7.x ABAP OO coding):
* fill the internal table "MONITOR", to make monitor entries
IF ( COMM_STRUCTURE-PROCESSKEY = '023' or
    COMM_STRUCTURE-PROCESSKEY = '003' )
    AND COMM_STRUCTURE-BWAPPLNM EQ 'MM'
    AND COMM_STRUCTURE-CPPVLC <> 0.
    RESULT = COMM_STRUCTURE-CPPVLC.
* if the returncode is not equal zero, the result will not be updated
    RETURNCODE = 0.
else.
    RETURNCODE = 4.
endif.
* if abort is not equal zero, the update process will be canceled
ABORT = 0.
Regards,
Andreas

2LIS_02_ITM deleted line items are not reflected in BW

Hi,
Our current Data flow 2LIS_02_ITM-->DSO-->CUBE.
I am analyzing a Invoice, When it is created 01.04.2014 it has got 10 Line Items and all the data is load to BW,Invoice with 10 Line items.
In ECC I can now see the same Invoice only got 5 line items and from change log I can see 5 line items are deleted on 15.04.2014.These changes are not reflected in BW.In BW invoice data still shows 10 line items.
If I perform setup table job and ECC RSA3 for that invoice I am getting only 5.
I believe it’s something to do with 0RECORDMODE,Can you please let me know how to fix this in BW.
Thanks

Yes this is a known behavior in case of deltas.
For Deleted line items Rocancel field will have an entry with R.
To handle this you need to map ROCANCEL field in Technical group of transformation (Between Datasource to DSO) with 0Recordmode.
Once you will do that then after activating the data in DSO it will nullify the records and deleted order or item will not appear.
Regards,
AL

How to Map Field of R/3 (Lenth more then 60) to an Infoobject

Hi All,
I want to bring long text in my cube which is already having purchase data.
As we have enhanshed the fields in my data source 2lis_02_itm and Scl. Now how can i map my infoobject in BW with the fields so that the data will be stored in the cube correclty.
Regards
Premanshu Gupta

Hi,
Check the Blog,It will solve ur problem,they have given the step by step procedure.
/people/sap.user72/blog/2006/06/03/long-texts-in-sap-bw-modeling-150-follow-up

Purchase order item(2lis_02_itm) and 0PUR_O01 transformation

Hello,
I'm trying to populate DSO 0PUR_O01 with standard DS 2LIS_02_ITM Purchase Order Items
The mappings are not copied after BCT installation. so i have trouble in mappings some of the keyfigures of 0PUR_O01 with the extractor fields. It's confusing.
I did try to check rsosfieldmap for the datasource but failed to display any data for 2LIS_02_ITM. There are no entries in the table foe this DS.
0PDLV_QTY Actual Quantity Delivered
0PREQU_QTY Desired Delivery Quantity
0PCONF_QTY Confirmed Quantity
0PDVQLECR Quantity Delivered Late Acc. to Requested Delivery Date
0PDVQEYSC Quantity Delivered Early According to Schedule Line Date
0PDVQLESC Quantity Delivered Late According to Schedule Line Date
0PQCOASREQ Quantity Confirmed as Requested
0LOWR_BND Tolerance Limit for Under Delivery in %
0UPPR_BND Tolerance Limit for Over Delivery in %
Please suggest how to go ahead with the mappings ..

Hello Raj,
What ur following 3.5 or 7.0...?
In 7 there are less chances for mapping after BCT installation, you have to do manually mapping in some cases. You can also face some problem of copying routine. So need to see each and every field accordingly.
Best practice is to install in 3.5 and then migrate to 7 with appropriate steps.
Thanks,
Santosh

BW: Transaction Key in 2LIS_02_ITM

Hi ,
In the datasource for Purchasing 2LIS_02_ITM and it is also there in the Schedule line item 2LIS_02_SCL, there is a field called BW: Transaction Key mapped to BWVORG in R/3. It looks to me, that it provides information about, whether it is a invoice, GR, and so on. Does anyone know, what are the different values and what do they mean. Thanks a bunch for helping me.

Hi Sonali,
Check oss 684465
In the BW customizing is possible to maintain the description of the
transaction key for transferring Logistics movement data to BW system,
field BWVORG in purchasing data sources, but this will not change
the BWVORG determination process.
Customizing (transaction MCB0):
Settings for application specific -> Logistics ->Purchasing settings ->
Maintain Transaction Key for SAP BW.
Here is a list of the values that BWVORG can assume, according with
the purchasing item type, processed document and purchasing order type:
1 - For non return items:
    a) Document type: Purchasing order
        - Normal purchasing order - BWVORG = 001
        - Stock transport order   - BWVORG = 011
        - Cross company order     - BWVORG = 021
    b) Document type: Goods receipt
        - Normal purchasing order - BWVORG = 002
        - Stock transport order   - BWVORG = 012
        - Cross company order     - BWVORG = 022
    c) Document type: Invoice receipt
        - Normal purchasing order - BWVORG = 003
- Stock transport order - BWVORG = 013
        - Cross company order     - BWVORG = 023
    d) Document type: Scheduling agreement
        - Normal scheduling agreement - BWVORG = 004
        - Stock transport agreement   - BWVORG = 014
        - Cross company agreement     - BWVORG = 024
    e) Document type: Contract
        - Normal contract             - BWVORG = 008
        - Cross company contract      - BWVORG = 028
    f) Document type: Request of quotation
        - Request of quotation        - BWVORG = 009
        - Quotation                  - BWVORG = 040
2 - For return items:
    a) Document type: Purchasing order
        - Normal purchasing order - BWVORG = 005
        - Stock transport order   - BWVORG = 015
        - Cross company order     - BWVORG = 025
    b) Document type: Goods receipt
        - Normal purchasing order - BWVORG = 006
        - Stock transport order   - BWVORG = 016
        - Cross company order     - BWVORG = 026
    c) Document type: Invoice receipt
        - Normal purchasing order - BWVORG = 007
        - Stock transport order   - BWVORG = 017
        - Cross company order     - BWVORG = 027
    d) Document type: Scheduling agreement
        - Normal scheduling agreement - BWVORG = 041
        - Stock transport agreement   - BWVORG = 051
        - Cross company agreement     - BWVORG = 061
Jaya

2LIS_02_ITM - Deleted items are not in the ODS 0PUR_O01

Hello,
We activated 2LIS_02_ITM extractor. We noticed that the deleted order items are not available in the ODS 0PUR_O01. SAP Note 578471 (Deleted positions in BW and statistics) explains that deleted items are not "statistical" relevant. However, this is an issue for us. Does anybody know if it's possible to change the behaviour of the extractor to keep deleted order items in the ODS ?
Many thanks.
François.

Yes this is a known behavior in case of deltas.
For Deleted line items Rocancel field will have an entry with R.
To handle this you need to map ROCANCEL field in Technical group of transformation (Between Datasource to DSO) with 0Recordmode.
Once you will do that then after activating the data in DSO it will nullify the records and deleted order or item will not appear.
Regards,
AL

0GR_VAL_PD KF has not mapped with source in 0Pur_C01 but value comes

HI All
I have problem with 0GR_VAL_PD kf in 0PUR_C01 cube. 0GR_VAL_PD KF has not mapped with source in 0Pur_C01 but in report level, value is coming for purchase organisation,material group .
But GR value as at posting date (0GR_VAL_PD)value not coming for particular material group or purch. org. but some days before, values were coming for particular material group or purch. org..
so need your help.
Thanks n Regards,
Gaurav Sekhri
Edited by: gaurav sekhri on Aug 18, 2010 11:41 AM
Edited by: gaurav sekhri on Aug 18, 2010 11:43 AM

Hi Susan
Which datasource you are using at present. Normally 0PUR_C01 gets loaded from 2LIS_02_ITM and 2LIS_02_SCL. The keyfigure that you have mentioned will come from 2LIS_02_SCL with the code that you have written.
The code that you have written should work. Please check if the code is in the transformation from 2LIS_02_SCL.
Share the details on why do you think the solution didn't work.
Regards
Karthik

One field in standard datasource 2LIS_02_ITM can not be found in LBWE

Dear expert:
I have one field NOPOS of datasource 2LIS_02_ITM (Purchasing Order Item) need to find the source table.
Here my question is: NOPOS is a standard field of datasource 2LIS_02_ITM, why can I not find this field in LBWE through maintenance? Any suggestion to find the source table?
Thanks all for your time in advance~
Tim

even if it is a counter field it should be present in DataSource structure as the infosource of this DataSource has mapping of this field.
Check the HELP.SAP.COM documentation for same
Regards,
Sharayu

Mapping 0LOC_CURRCY to 0ORDER_CURR

Hi,
I'm a bit confused here.
In the update rules 2LIS_02_ITM on e.g. 0BBP_INV I see a mapping:
0ORDER_CURR <- 0LOC_CURRCY
While the extractor provides both WAERS (order currcy) and HWAERS (Local currcy).
Isn't there a conflict?
Or is there a currency translation behid it somewhere?
Regards,
Eric

Eric,
The mapping in the Transfer Rules is just that, a mapping. No transformation occurs unless you do it explicitly via a logic or user exit of some kind or the InfoObject contains a transformation on its definition, which I don't think is the case.
So, considering this, the mapping from local currency to order currency is valid. And again, it's up to you to make the conversion to EUR from CHF.
It would be good to ask your business users how those currencies should be considered and give them this example.
I don't have documentation about currency conversion, just the experience of using it in some projects. If I find some, I'll let you know, for sure.
Regards,
Luis

Transformations for 2lis_02_itm, 2lis_02_scl

Dear Team,
I am currently implementing Purchasing module and using the datasources 2lis_02_itm and 2lis_02_scl. I have installed 0pur_c01 cube from business content. But in the business content we dont have 7.0 transformations from data source to cube. But the update rules are available completely.
How can we get activated complete transformations flow in system.
Transformations for 2lis_02_itm data source is available. but the complete rules are not mapped.
Please let me know the solution if some have faced the same situation.
Current our system is in bi content 704 and SAP Netweaver 7.01.
Regards,
Don

HI ,
Simple way is to Install the 3.x flow from BI content and then migrate them to the 7.0 flow , we have done that most of the times when there is no BI content available for the new dataflow
-->how to doc for reference
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/00d94ca8-9538-2c10-9b99-859afde1fa4a?QuickLink=index&overridelayout=true
Regards,
Sathya

Transfer Checkbox for 2LIS_02_ITM datasource

Hi Experts,
On enhancing 2LIS_02_ITM with 2 Z-fields and replicating to BI side, the transfer checkbox (5th column on fields tab of datasource display) in datasource is not enabled for these 2 fields and hence these fields are not available to be mapped to infosource.
Any ideas as to how to enable the checkbox.?
rgds
Deepak

Hi.
Please use RSA6 to edit the datasource 2lis_02_scl and uncheck those 2 fileds you added in.
Best Regards
Martin Xie

Remote System and Remote Key Mapping at a glance

Hi,
I want to discuss the concept of Remote System and Remote Key Mapping.
Remote System is a logical system which is defined in MDM Console for a MDM Repository.
We can define key mapping enabled at each table level.
The key mapping is used to distinguish records at Data Manager after running the Data Import.
Now 1 record can have 1 remote system with two different keys but two different records cannot have same remote system with same remote key. So, Remote key is an unique identifier for record for any remote system for each individual records.
Now whenever we import data from a Remote System, the remote system and remote key are mapped for each individual records. Usually all records have different remote keys.
Now, when syndicating back the record with default remote key is updated in the remote system that is sent by xml file format.
If same record is updated two times from a same remote system, the remote key will be different and the record which is latest contains highest remote key.
Now, I have to look at Data Syndication and Remote key.
I have not done Data Syndication but my concept tell if there is duplicate record with same remote system but different remote keys both will be syndicated back. But if same record have two remote keys for same remote system then only the default remote key is syndicated back.
Regards
Kaushik Banerjee

You are right Kaushik,
I have not done Data Syndication but my concept tell if there is duplicate record with same remote system but different remote keys both will be syndicated back.
Yes, but if they are duplicate, they needs to be merged.
But if same record have two remote keys for same remote system then only the default remote key is syndicated back.
This is after merging. So whichever remote key has tick mark in key mapping option(default) , it will be syndicated back.
Pls refer to these links for better understanding.
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/library/uuid/80eb6ea5-2a2f-2b10-f68e-bf735a45705f
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/library/uuid/7051c376-f939-2b10-7da1-c4f8f9eecc8c%0c
Hope this helps,
+ An

Error while deleting a mapping

Hi all,
I am getting the following error while deleting a mapping. My client version is 10.2.0.4.36
API5072: Internal Error: Null message for exception. Please contact Oracle Support with the stack trace and details on how to reproduce it.
oracle.wh.util.Assert: API5072: Internal Error: Null message for exception. Please contact Oracle Support with the stack trace and details on how to reproduce it.
     at oracle.wh.util.Assert.owbAssert(Assert.java:51)
     at oracle.wh.ui.jcommon.OutputConfigure.showMsg(OutputConfigure.java:216)
     at oracle.wh.ui.common.CommonUtils.error(CommonUtils.java:370)
     at oracle.wh.ui.common.WhDeletion.doActualDel(WhDeletion.java:512)
     at oracle.wh.ui.common.WhDeletion.deleteObject(WhDeletion.java:203)
     at oracle.wh.ui.common.WhDeletion.deleteObject(WhDeletion.java:283)
     at oracle.wh.ui.jcommon.tree.WhTree.deleteItem(WhTree.java:346)
     at oracle.wh.ui.console.commands.DeleteCmd.performAction(DeleteCmd.java:50)
     at oracle.wh.ui.console.commands.TreeMenuHandler$1.run(TreeMenuHandler.java:188)
     at java.awt.event.InvocationEvent.dispatch(InvocationEvent.java:189)
     at java.awt.EventQueue.dispatchEvent(EventQueue.java:478)
     at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpOneEventForHierarchy(EventDispatchThread.java:201)
     at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEventsForHierarchy(EventDispatchThread.java:151)
     at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(EventDispatchThread.java:145)
     at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(EventDispatchThread.java:137)
     at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.run(EventDispatchThread.java:100)
Thanks in advance!
Sebastian

These type of Internal Errors are all too common in OWB and it's difficult to diagnose the exact problem.
I'd suggest closing the Design Centre, going back in and trying to delete it again, this will often resolve Internal errors.
There's also an article on Metalink Doc ID: 460411.1 about errors when deleting mappings but it's specific to an ACLContainer error, so may or may not be of use.
One of the suggestions is to connect as the Repository Owner rather than a User and try to delete the mapping.
Cheers
Si
Edited by: ScoobySi on Sep 10, 2009 11:44 AM

2LIS_02_ITM : 0CREATEDON mapping

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for