2nd level padding

Hi guys,
Anyone knows where to configure and set the padding for the tabs on the 2nd-level navigation? I can see tat the padding done for 1st-level navigation is at System Admin > Portal Display > Top Level Navigation but not for 2nd-level.

Hi Boopolan,
I already have a 2nd-level navigation at the Top level Navigation and looking for where to configure the space between the tabs at the 2nd-level.

Similar Messages

Leave request is not coming in 2nd level approval in MSS NWBC

Hi all,
I am getting the leave request for 2nd level approval in MSS work item.
But I want that in MSS Leave approval () .
Is there any configuration to do for this.?

I am getting the leave request for 2nd level approval in MSS work item ?
your getting leave request in POWL Application i.e Bulk approval list. This is correct only.
But I want that in MSS Leave approval () . ?
Can you explain little more clear.

Link between Delivery Header & Sales Order Item for extraction to 2nd level

Hi Guys ,
I am having a requirement that need to pull the following data to 2nd level DSO
1. Delivery Header Data
2. Sales Order Item data. ( Sales Document, Item, Item RDD, Material)
So I am planning create a 2nd level DSO on top of Delivery header and need to pull the sales order ITEM level data ( Sales document , Order ITEM, ITEM RDD date , Material) through start routine u2026
How can I pull the Sales Order Item data through start routine? i.e I need the link between Delivery Header & Sales Order Item Data .
or I need the link between LIKP ( Delivery Header) Vs VBAP ( Sales Document Item).
Thanks
Edited by: krismady on Sep 22, 2010 2:26 AM
or I need the link between LIKP ( Delivery Header) Vs VBAP ( Sales Document Item).

Hi Krish,
You can use VBLEN (Sales Document) to link Delivery header DS (2LIS_12_VCHDR) and Delivery item DS (2LIS_12_VCITM). Now In delivery item DS (2LIS_12_VCITM) you have VGBEL (Reference doc.) and VGPOS (Reference item) which is nothing but sales order document number and sales item in Order item DS (2LIS_11_VAITM) .
So you need to link in above way to get other values in your DSO.
It is proven method.
Thanks,
Uday Shankar.

Dunning - 2nd level dunning is not working

Hello Experts
I have received a requirement from client for configuration of two level dunning (ie 14 & 35 days). I did the following configuration
(a) Defined the Dunning Area
(b) Defined the Dunning procedure in the following manner:
Dunning Interval in days - 1
No. of Dunning Levels - 2
Total Due items for Dunning - 0
Minimum Days arreas - 14
Line Item grace period - 14
Selected -> Standard transaction dunning
Under Dunning Level Tab
Days in Arrears - 14 & 35
We are not using interest & no penality charges.
Assigned the Dunning Test with the following combination
Letter 1 u2013
W_MHND-BUKRS = Company Name
W_MHND-MAHNN = 1
W_MHND_SMABER = Dunning Area
W_MHNK-MAHNA = u2018Dunning Procedureu2019
Letter 2 u2013
W_MHND-BUKRS = Company Name
W_MHND-MAHNN = 2
W_MHND_SMABER = Dunning Area
W_MHNK-MAHNA = u2018Dunning Procedureu2019
(c) Maintained the Dunning Area in customer master data -> Company code data -> Correspondance
(d) I have posted the sales invoice with posting date and due date as 01.03.2011.
While carrying the dunning activtity through T.Code F150 (I did the 1st level run with dunning date as 22.03.2011 ) -> All the activities are going smothly like Dunning selection completed, Dunning Print out completed and Sample Printout is completed for the 1st level
The second level dunning is carried on 26.04.2011 as dunning date. However, after completion of selection perameters. the system is showing as Dunning Selection is completed bu the system log says as follows:
Date Time Message
26.04.2011 15:34:12 Job started
26.04.2011 15:34:12 Step 001 started (program SAPF150S2, variant &0000000000523, user ID AMUNNALURI)
26.04.2011 15:34:12 ****************** Log for dunning run 20110430 / TEST1 ****************
26.04.2011 15:34:13 =========================================================================
26.04.2011 15:34:13 > Account D 0000000061, company code SC01 is being processed
26.04.2011 15:34:13 > Reading account data and document information Phase 0
26.04.2011 15:34:13 > Account D 0000000061 has a payment method for incoming payments
26.04.2011 15:34:13 > Account D 0000000061 read items: 11
26.04.2011 15:34:13 > Processing and completing dunning lines Phase I
26.04.2011 15:34:13 > Doc. 0090000052/2008/001 has payment method for incoming payments, no dun.notice
26.04.2011 15:34:13 > Document 0090000380/2008/001 has new dunning level 1.
26.04.2011 15:34:13 > Doc. 0090000381/2008/001 has payment method for incoming payments, no dun.notice
26.04.2011 15:34:13 > Doc. 0090000384/2008/001 has payment method for incoming payments, no dun.notice
26.04.2011 15:34:13 > Doc. 0090000387/2008/001 has payment method for incoming payments, no dun.notice
26.04.2011 15:34:13 > Doc. 0090000614/2008/001 has payment method for incoming payments, no dun.notice
26.04.2011 15:34:13 > Doc. 1400000052/2008/002 has payment method for incoming payments, no dun.notice
26.04.2011 15:34:13 > Doc. 1800000012/2008/001 has payment method for incoming payments, no dun.notice
26.04.2011 15:34:13 > Document 0064000433/2010/001 has new dunning level 2.
26.04.2011 15:34:13 > Document 0064000437/2010/001 has new dunning level 2.
26.04.2011 15:34:13 > Document 0064000438/2010/001 has new dunning level 2.
26.04.2011 15:34:13 > Check legal dunning procedure and credit memos Phase II -
26.04.2011 15:34:13 > Minimum charges and dunning interest Phase III
26.04.2011 15:34:13 > Generate dunning data Phase IV
26.04.2011 15:34:14 Job finished
If i continue the Dunning Print & Sample Print out.. the system is showing the following logs
Date Time Message
26.04.2011 15:35:31 Job started
26.04.2011 15:35:31 Step 001 started (program SAPF150D2, variant &0000000000344, user ID AMUNNALURI)
26.04.2011 15:35:31 > Start print phase
26.04.2011 15:35:31 0 dunning notices were read
26.04.2011 15:35:31 0 dunning notices have been printed
26.04.2011 15:35:31 End dunning printout 30.04.11 / TEST1
26.04.2011 15:35:31 Job finished
Kindly let me know, did i missed any steps in the configuration??
Regards
Anil

Hello Renan
Thanks for your reply, I am finding difference during 1st run and 2nd level run during selection perameters in the following area.
(Note that, we are not using the Interest / charges)
During 1st level dunning the system is showing as Dunning Level Log under Phase II, Phase III, Phase IV document no.
26.04.2011 15:30:38 > Check legal dunning procedure and credit memos Phase II -
26.04.2011 15:30:38 > Minimum charges and dunning interest Phase III
26.04.2011 15:30:38 > Interest indicator 0N and currency GBP are missing in T056Z
26.04.2011 15:30:38 > Generate dunning data Phase IV
26.04.2011 15:30:38 >
26.04.2011 15:30:38 > Account D 0000000061 dunning notice/dun.area. Dunning area 58 is being processed.
26.04.2011 15:30:38 > Account D 0000000061 dunning notice/dun.level. Dunning level 1 is being processed.
26.04.2011 15:30:38 > Account D 0000000061 uses dunning procedure DG3
26.04.2011 15:30:38 > Dunning level D 0000000061 is used for account 1
26.04.2011 15:30:38 > Document 0064000438/2010/001: Dunning level 1, days in arrears 20, status <.Dpi>
26.04.2011 15:30:38 > Account D 0000000061 dunning data has been generated.
26.04.2011 15:30:39 Job finished
Where as for 2nd level dunning the system is showing under Dunning Level Log is as follows:
26.04.2011 15:34:13 > Document 0064000438/2010/001 has new dunning level 2.
26.04.2011 15:34:13 > Check legal dunning procedure and credit memos Phase II -
26.04.2011 15:34:13 > Minimum charges and dunning interest Phase III
26.04.2011 15:34:13 > Generate dunning data Phase IV
26.04.2011 15:34:14 Job finished
Due to this, i am presumed that some more configuration has been missed at my end.
Kindly revert with your observations in the above log
Regards
Anil

2nd level of Drill Down

Hello,
I am making the Drill Down configuration.
1st Level is
- Area
2nd Level is
-Branch
3rd Level is
-Shops
After I make above configuration, I test this on the BI Answers.
ex)
Area
New York
Tokyo
Paris
1. I click the column "Tokyo".
2. Then the report will show like this
Area 　　Branch
Tokyo　　Asakusa
　　　　　　Ginza
and I can click "Tokyo","Asakusa" and "Ginza".
But at this point, I don't want to let users click the "Tokyo" column , but only "Asakusa" and "Ginza" columns.
Is it possible by the configuration of the BIEE Repository or Answers ??

Hi,
I dont think so it is possible.
But If you click "tokyo" only you can see "Asakusa" and "Ginza".How would you stop user to not click tokyo if you want to get to other step to "branches".
If you want to achieve that directly create a dimension for Branch and shops.So user will see branches and shops and make it as a separate sheet for that specific user and give him permissions.
Hope it helps you.
By,
Kranthi.

Just I want to know What is 1st level & 2nd level support

At client place on shore in production support project in as What is 1st level & 2nd level support?
and Nature of work
Thanks in advance
Edited by: Arun Varadarajan on Feb 5, 2009 2:34 PM
Edited by: Arun Varadarajan on Feb 5, 2009 2:37 PM

I would still defend myself saying that this has already been answered...
I just did a search on SDN and found a post that would answer your question....
Re: Help desk& rollup
you are looking at L1 and L2 support....
The thread was locked because the question is already answered ( or discussed about ) in another post and you can get your answers faster by just searching....
Also if you do find the answers fetched as not being correct or accurate enough - you would need to mention that you did search the forums before posting. This way questions which have already been answered are not brought up again and it ends up with others doing the searching for you which paints a wrong picture...
Also in some cases L1 teams are merged with the company's existing L1 support desk to avoid confusion but follow similar rules as mentioned in the link and simlarly L2 - when you have multiple systems being supported by a central support team you get such scenarios where L1 and L2 are on-shore.
My 0.02
Arun Varadarajan
P.S I am removing the reference to my name in the title... and BTW the search took me less than 2 minutes ... which is why we want people to use the search functionality more than raising duplicate posts....
Edited by: Arun Varadarajan on Feb 5, 2009 2:35 PM
Edited by: Arun Varadarajan on Feb 5, 2009 2:36 PM

2nd Level Dunning Problem

Hello Experts
I have configured the two level dunning procedure. Configuration settings are as follows:
(a) Defined the Dunning Area
(b) Defined the Dunning procedure in the following manner:
Dunning Interval in days - 1
No. of Dunning Levels - 2
Total Due items for Dunning - 0
Minimum Days arreas - 14
Line Item grace period - 14
Selected -> Standard transaction dunning
Under Dunning Level Tab
Days in Arrears - 14 & 35
We are not using interest & no penality charges.
Assigned the Dunning Test with the following combination
Observations during Testing :-
(1) Customer sales invoice posted on 01.03.2011 and due date is 01.03.2011
(2) 1st level dunning carried on 21.03.2011 and dunning run and print out is success
(3) 2nd level dunning carried on 30.04.2011 .... here the system is showing the dunning run log
     Document number XXXXXX (same document what i have posted on 01.03.2011) has now dunning level 2
     But the system is (a) Not checked the Dunning notice / dunning area for customer
                                   (b) Not checked the Dunning procedure
                                    but shown as job finished
    If i continue the print out option - the sytem is showing 0 dunning notices are read & not customer dunning history updated
Kindly let me did i missed any configuration ? Altenatvely if i want to do the debug with the help of ABAP.. in which program i need to maintain the Break point
Kindly revert
Regards
Anil

Hi
Did the dunning run on suggested date.. but unfortunately the result is the same
Regards
Anil

How to restrict from creating the Network for 1st & 2nd level WBS

Hi All,
In our project structure we have up to 5 levels of WBS, In some cases we have creates 3 level also . Now we want to restrict creates Network for first two level WBS , actually we want to restrict user to Create PR for those WBS so if we restrict them from creation of Network for 1st & 2nd level then they not able to create PR for same .
Thanks,
Virendra

Hi Virendra,
I can suggest you other way round solution.
If you are sure that those two WBS will not take any actual or commitment cost, then its better to NOT to mark those WBS elements as Account Assignment Element. I mean, if you do not set the indicator of Acct. Assignment Element (Untick Acct Assignment Element) on those WBS, then user will not be able to create Networks on those WBS Elements. Try this on your development or quality client and let me know if it works.
If it works, then you just need to disabled the Acct. Assignment Element indicator for those two WBS element and you can achieve that through substitution and field selection of WBS as well.
OR
Just look at OPSG settings at tab component. Just look if that can solve your purpose because your requirement is to stop PR from those WBS element. (I am just wondering if you can stop user from creating/change material components from those WBS-Networks)
OR
Go for User Status and set it to on those WBS Elements. Object Types will be Networks and Network Header.
OR
Try to achieve a validation or substitution where in you can mark Res./Pur. Req as 1 (Never) only for those two WBS elements. In this way user cannot create PR on those two WBS elements.
Regards,
Amit

Limited view on 2nd level Navigation Bar

Hi
Is there a way to assign permission on a page on the 2nd level navigation?
I explain:
First level has teh Entry Point "MY Work".
Second Level has the pages assigned to My Work
"Page A" "Page B" "Page C"
Currently, I assign My Work role to everyone, so they will view all 3 pages.
PROBLEM:... I want "Page C" to be under "My Work" BUT only be viewed by selected users.
Can this be done?
How else can I do this?
Help needed urgently!!
Appreciate any info
Thanx
RD

Hi RD,
two possibilities:
a) By merging roles (the standard way). See http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/53/89503ede925441e10000000a114084/frameset.htm for details. Experts would have roles "Everyone" as well as "Expert".
b) By delta links: You create a workset as entry point "MyWork" containing Pages A and B; this workset is assigned to Role Everyone. Than you create a Role "Expert", assign the workset "MyWork" as deltalink (already containing pages A and B), now adding page C. Experts would have Role "Expert" only.
Hope it helps
Detlev

2nd level navigation

Hi Community,
we have a fpn working here with RRA. Filter_id's are implemented in the consumer portal desktops. Navigation is built by roles
RoleA (Entry Point, Filter_id = A, Merge_id = x)
- RoleB(Entry Point, Filter_id = A, Merge_id = x)
- FolderA
- FolderB
- RoleC(Entry Point, Filter_id = A, Merge_id = x)
- FolderC
If i call a desktop which has no elements with the filter_id all entry points appear, which means 1st, 2nd level and detailed navigation (correctly). So i guess its no permission problem. But if i call a desktop with filter id "A" only first level appears.
I tried
- different merge id's to merge all under RoleA (e.g. RoleA merge_id = x, RoleBC merge_id = xd)
- not to filter second level
- defining folder as entry points and roles not
Someone knows how to merge and filter them correctly? Help please.
Thanks & Regards

Hi,
Check this weblog.
EFP: Working with the new Taglibs - Part 3
Reward useful answers
Regards,
Ganesh N

TOC - First level appearing after 1st instance of 2nd level

Is there a known issue or paragraph style conflict that might cause the first level title to appear after the first instance (same page#) of the 2nd level in the table of contents?
for example, chapter one page 1 should appear first in this list but does not:
Chapter 1 Intro..............Page 1
Subtopic1 Chapter 1........Page 1
CHAPTER 1......................Page 1 (this should appear first in list)
Subtopic2 Chapter 1........Page 2
Subtopic3 Chapter 1........Page 3
Chapter 2 Intro..............Page 4
CHAPTER 2......................Page 4 (this should appear before Ch2Intro)
Subtopic1 Chapter 2........Page 5
It appears the page number being the same across multiple levels is causing some confusion. I am not sure if this is a style set up for the top level style. ??

Hi Lara,
When TOC paragraphs are not all in the same story, InDesign can become confused about the order of the paragraphs on a given page. It looks to me as if "CHAPTER 1" and "Chaper 1 Intro" are in different stories. The easiest way to get them into the correct order in the TOC is to link the two stories, with "Chapter 1 Intro" following "CHAPTER 1" in that story.
Thanks,
Ole

Installer (2nd level) hangs at 7% then quits

I've recently updated to X.8.3 (from X.6.8) via a complete erase and install. When I go to a web page with Flash, I'm told to update my Flash. I download the installer and then start the installer up. The Flash window shows that the 2nd level installer is downloading and quickly goes to 7% then hangs. After a few minutes, the windows goes away, no message, no nothing.
When I go to the Adobe help pages, they tell you to uninstall what you have (I can't uninstall what hasn't been installed), it tells me to be sure I'm downloading the latest version (I have), and as I keep on trying to dig deeper into adobe support, I keep on getting turned right back to the same page that isn't helping me at all. I feel like I'm in an old Twilight Zone episode.
So how can I install Flash on my Mac Pro running X.8.3 into Safari and FireFox?
Thanks,
Gary

Is it possible the directory was corrupted so the Mac can't access the drive?
That is a definite possibility. If that is so, the latest version of Disk Warrior should be able to rebuild and replace your directory.
How could aborting the upgrade when I did cause a HDD failure?
I don't think I said that it did. It may be just coincidental. HDDs do fail in time. The average life is 3 to 5 years with 1 to 3 per cent failing in year one. The platters on these drives have a thin coat of lubricant which, with age and heat thickens and becomes gummy, and spin out to the edges of the platter with centrifugal force causing sticking heads. In addition the high rotational speeds and the fact that the bearings are literally floating in lubricant leads to wear and instability. So, replacing an HDD after three or four years even if it is not troubling, may not be a bad idea, although many of us wait until we need to do it.
I've ordered the latest version of Disk Warrior... and I pray it launches without a kernel panic.
I hope that it does, too, and that it is able to rebuild and replace your directory.
Other than that do I have any other options?
Archive and Install or a complete reformat, erase and reinstall.
cornelius

Collapse Tree on 2nd level in 6i

i have a tree which populates with below code on button click
DECLARE
my_tree ITEM;
my_num NUMBER;
node    number;
state   number;
BEGIN
--Set Tree--
my_tree := Find_Item('BLOCK12.TREE9');
my_num := POPULATE_GROUP('record_group8');
FTREE.SET_TREE_PROPERTY(my_tree, FTREE.RECORD_GROUP, 'record_group8');
node    := Ftree.Find_Tree_Node(my_tree, '');
                    -- Collapse all --
                    WHILE NOT ftree.ID_NULL(node) LOOP
                    state := Ftree.Get_Tree_Node_Property(my_tree, node, Ftree.NODE_STATE);
                               IF state = Ftree.EXPANDED_NODE THEN
                    Ftree.Set_Tree_Node_Property(my_tree, node, Ftree.NODE_STATE, Ftree.COLLAPSED_NODE);
                    END IF;
                    node := Ftree.Find_Tree_Node(my_tree, '', Ftree.FIND_NEXT,Ftree.NODE_LABEL, '', node);
                    END LOOP;
END;the node's are collopsed on the fitst level as
-NODE0i need to keep the collopse to the 2nd level of the tree
-NODE0
--NODE1
--NODE2
--NODE3

well this is little tricky i was unable to find some solution for it myself so i made a custom procedure to solve it...
This code might gives u some idea .....i modified it for ur understanding..
Declare
htree item;
node ftree.node;
state number;
from_state ftree.node;
to_state ftree.node;
counter number := 0;
node_depth number;
BEGIN
     from_state := ftree.EXPANDED_NODE;
     to_state   := ftree.COLLAPSED_NODE;
   -- Find the tree itself.
   htree := Find_Item('tree_block.menu_tree');
    --Collapsing all nodes
   for x in(select menu_no, order_no, master_menu_no, menu_file_name, menu_desc_en
                      from TableName
                   order by menu_no, order_no)
     loop
     node := Ftree.Find_Tree_Node(htree, x.menu_no, Ftree.FIND_NEXT, upper(Ftree.NODE_VALUE), ftree.root_node, ftree.root_node);
     state := Ftree.Get_Tree_Node_Property(htree, node, Ftree.NODE_STATE);
     IF state = from_state THEN
       Ftree.Set_Tree_Node_Property(htree, node, Ftree.NODE_STATE, to_state);
     END IF;
end loop;
END;Baig
[My Oracle Blog|http://baigsorcl.blogspot.com/]

How to do 2nd level workflow

Hi Experts,
I have done one workflow of first level. Now if approver approves then it needs to be sent to the 2nd approver based on first approver's action. If 1st approver approves it has to go to 2nd level otherwise it has to go to initiator.
Please guide me how can achieve this 2nd level process.
Thanks
G.s.naidu

Hi,
Generally in standard workflow on reject action workflow will be closed. so in standard workflow u wont get this functionality.
For this requirement,
1. First do looping on Approver 1 user decision task by creating loop step.
2. If Approver 1 approves the request, then set one flag = 'X' by providing container operation step.
3. Create termination condition flag = 'X' and two outcome 'true' and 'false' in loop step. if flag = 'X' ( Approver 1 approves the request ) then loop step terminate and outcome will be 'true' and it will come out of the loop and goes to approver 2.
4. If Approver 1 reject the request then this time flag value is not 'X' means it will check termianting condition in loop step and follow output 'False'. Now in this branch provide one activity or mail step as per your requirement & in which assign initiator as an agent. so it will goes to initiator if Approver 1 reject the request.
Hope this will help you now.
Smit

Performance Appraisal - Default 2nd level manager as Part Appraiser

Hello
Unfortnately, we are not having much success with this. The requirement is to default 2nd level manager as Part Appraiser and not show the Manager and EE as part appraiser.
For this we created a implementation for the BADI HRHAP00_DOC_DEF_DP and incorporated the same in our appraisal template. But the system is now bringing only the EE as the part appraisal.
Has someone worked on something similar and is so what is the best way to approach this?
Thanks,

Hi Harun
Thank you for your feedback. By any chance would it be possible for you to post the code that we could use as a template on our end. The reason being, the ABAP person working on this project is very new and any guidance in terms of the tables to be included etc. would be greatly appreciated.
Many thanks in advance.

2nd level padding

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for