3rd Party Remittance? Debit Balance

Earlier this year we had a correction to a union due which resulted in a negative $1 payment to the union, so in other words a refund to us.  For that payperiod, this transaction was the only financial activty for that union. Needless to say we couldn't cut a -$1 check to the vendor.
In subsequent payrolls the negative $1 has not been netted from payments to the union. Is there a config set up I am missing or a process that I need to know of?

Hello Brent,
There is no standard config available for this.
I think the answer is in your question. If there no activity for that union ( I assume vendor) then until now system didn't find any transaction to offset $1.
Arti

Similar Messages

  • FI postings,3rd party remittance & Taxation

    Hi Team,
    I want to know how to configure Fi posting, 3rd party remittance & taxation part in US payroll. Kindly let em know how we do it in SAP.
    Waiting for your response.
    Regards,
    Vimal

    maintain the follow ing tables
    V_T52EL maintian the symbol for the wage types
    V_T52ek maintian the symbolic account for that wage type
    and maitnian the feature F or c whether it goes to balance sheet or expenses
    it goest to expenses
    so check the tcode OBYG here for that chart of accounts assign ur wage type for G/L account

  • 3rd party remittance error

    Hello All,
    We have an issue with posting 3rd party tax payments .We created customer account types Z and X to post with PERNRs and assigned them to customer wage types and technical wage types (like /404). Righr now when we try to do 3rd party remittance we always has this error "No entry in T52EK for key /404 F or Q"
    Did anyone has similar situation like we have.
    Kind Regards,
    Rena

    Yes. I did assigned everything correctly.. I found error message in the program - I just replaced Z to Q and everything is working right now.
    Thank you

  • How to Reverse 3rd Party Remittance Document

    Hi,
    Would anyone let me know the process to reverse the 3rd Party Remittance document in HR. The current stage is- we had released the documents to FI side, and now we have already reversed the FI Side documents.
    While running the RPCIPR00 program, it is giving us the message -
    Job started                                                            
    Step 001 started (program RPCIPR00, variant &0000000000003, user ID FCALLCSCHR1)
    It is possible to reverse in a different period than which was posted in
    _Partially acknowledged posting runs cannot be deleted/undone/reversed._
    Spool request (number 0000020044) sent to SAP printer LOCL
    Remittance posting run 0000002792 cannot be deleted/undone/reversed.
    Job finished                 
    We are still not successfull to delete the 3rd party

    Self

  • 3rd Party Remittance Posting Error - No Posting Document Created (ECC 6.0)

    Hello Everyone,
    When running 3rd Party Remittance process, the system does not create a posting document to be released/posted in PCP0.  In PCP0, Run Type:  TP -posting thrid-party remittance does not exist.  Also, the T51R* tables are not updating properly as well when I execute the 3rd party processes.
    I've compared configuration from the old to the new system and it appears to be okay.  I need some assistance to figure out this issue.  Can someone give some advice on how to resolve my issue.
    Fyi...we run the following processes:
    PC00_M99_U500 - Evaluation Run
    PC00_M10_URMU- Store Evaluation Run
    PC00_M99_URMUP- Create Posting Run
    PCP0 - Process Posting Run
    Since we are not using the new Evaluation Run program(PC00_M99_URME), do we need to deactivate it to use the old evaluation run (PC00_M99_U500)? 
    Your advice will be greatly appreciated.
    Brenda Goodwin
    IT System Analyst
    Roche Diagnostics Operations, Inc

    Naveen,
    Thank you for your suggestion.  My configuration was correct.  The issue was a system issue in which was forwarded to SAP for immediate attention.  To correct my issue, I had to apply SAP Note 1039104 - GEN:  No Posting run number for 3PR posting run (RPURMP00).
    Kind Regards,
    Brenda Goodwin

  • Issue in 3rd Party Remittance to FI Posting

    Hi there,
    I am trying to run the Third Part remittance posting run and i am getting the issue "3rAccount with the following search key was not found: 1000HRFB039"
    while running i am getting 2 line items,
    1, Amount credit posted to Vendor account and debit posted to Techinal account (HRA).
    2, Amount credit posted to Techinal account and for Debit i have assigned the GL in HRF and for this i got the above mentioned issue.
    I checked in T030, V_T52EL and V_T52EZ, all entries are maintained. Please help me to resolve the issue.
    Cheers
    Sathiya

    Hi,
    I checked the Feature PPMOD, the employee subgrouping was maintained correctly. And also the acount assigment was also maintained for this employee grouping.
    Cheers
    Sathiya

  • 3rd party remittance issue

    Hi,
    We accidentally deleted a 3PR posting document (which was in created status, not yet posted). The status of the posting in remittance reconcilliation report for the corresponding evaluation run was 'being posted'.
    Now when we are trying to run create remittance posting for any other remittance evaluations, we get the error ' No entry in table T51R6_FUNDINFO for remiitance key 81818'
    I reckon that due to deletion of the posting doc the details of remittance key/symbolic accnt were removed from the table T51R6_FUNDINFO.
    How can we remove this error? Also is it possible to recover the deleted posting document in PCP0 or the associated remittance amounts?

    Hi,
    I checked the Feature PPMOD, the employee subgrouping was maintained correctly. And also the acount assigment was also maintained for this employee grouping.
    Cheers
    Sathiya

  • Submitting 3rd party payment garnishments via ACH file format

    Our Payroll Services is required by leglistation to submit child support garnishments electronically.  We wish to submit the employee garnishment details in an ACH file format.
    Do we have the ability to specifiy which details from IT0194 and IT0195 get created in the ACH file?  If so how?
    I have not been able to find this solution in configuration or a user exit.  Is a customization required or a BADI?
    We have been able to generate a Remittance Table  from the 3rd Party Remittance Evaluation Run, but it shows a number of unnecessary and blank fields.  We need other data, such as the Case Identifier Number, Employee Name, SSN, Status, Vendor ID, Order Type, Deduction $ Amount, etc...
    Thank you.

    Hi Manny,
    A couple of more questions:
    1. You mention PMW calls a function module which retrieves the HR info and fills the addenda garnishment info.  Which function module is this? 
    2. You suggest we copy the standard format ACH and modify it.  Which one is the "standard" and how do we modify it?  Does this involve a user exit? Or is it just the configuration steps mentioned above?  Can you provide more specific instructions on the config?
    3.  Can we produce multiple emplooyee garnishment info detailed records in one ACH file or is it one ACH file per employee?
    4.  About how long would this take to configure and set up?
    5.  We are able to generate an ACH CCD file, but we cannot get the SSN or Case ID to appear.  Instead of these details, we seem to receive an SAP system generated HR ID for the record. 
    Thanks very much for looking into this.
    Mihkel
    Edited by: Mihkel Jurima on Oct 5, 2009 5:44 PM

  • Garnishment Agency Fee - 3rd party Process

    Hello all,
    We are processing the Agency Fee for the Garnishment Child support using the SAP Service charge functionality. We want to pay to the Agency through the 3rd Party Process. But the service charges are not processing in the 3rd party remittance process.
    Any one had came across any scenario / thoughts on the above highly appreciated.
    Regards,

    Hai..
    Does Service fee serve ur purpose?

  • 3rd party distributed SW load balancing with In-Memory Replication

              Hi,
              Could someone please comment on the feasibility of the following setup?
              I've started testing replication with a software load balancing product. This
              product lets all nodes receive all packets and uses a kernel-level filter
              to let only one node at the time receive it. Since there's minimum 1 heartbeat
              between the nodes, there are several NICs in each node.
              At the moment it seems like it doesn't work: - I use the SessionServlet - with
              a 2-node cluster I first have the 2 nodes up and I access it with a single client:
              .the LB is configured to be sticky wrt. source IP address, so the same node gets
              all the traffic - when I stop the node receiving the traffic the other node takes
              over (I changed the colours of SessionServlet) . however, the counter restarts
              at zero
              From what I read of the in-memory replication documentation I thought that it
              might work also with a distributed software load balancing cluster. Any comments
              on the feasability of this?
              Is there a way to debug replication (in WLS6SP1)? I don't see any replication
              messages in the logs, so I'm not even sure that it works at all. - I do get a
              message about "Clustering Services startting" when I start the examples server
              on each node - is there anything tto look for in the console to make sure that
              things are working? - the evaluation license for WLS6SP1 on NT seems to support
              In-Memory Replication and Cluster. However, I've also seen a Cluster-II somewhere:
              is that needed?
              Thanks for your attention!
              Regards, Frank Olsen
              

    We are considering Resonate as one of the software load balancer. We haven't certified
              them yet. I have no idea how long its going to take.
              As a base rule if the SWLB can do the load balancing and maintain stickyness that is fine
              with us as long as it doesn't modify the cookie or the URL if URL rewriting is enabled.
              Having said that if you run into problems we won't be able to support you since it is not
              certified.
              -- Prasad
              Frank Olsen wrote:
              > Prasad Peddada <[email protected]> wrote:
              > >Frank Olsen wrote:
              > >
              > >> Hi,
              > >>
              > > We don't support any 3rd party software load balancers.
              >
              > Does that mean that there are technical reasones why it won't work, or just that
              > you haven't tested it?
              >
              > > As >I said before I am thinking your configuration is >incorrect if n-memory
              > replication is not working. I would >strongly suggest you look at webapp deployment
              > descriptor and >then the config.xml file.
              >
              > OK.
              >
              > >Also doing sticky based on source ip address is not good. You >should do it based
              > on passive cookie persistence or active >cookie persistence (with cookie insert,
              > a new one).
              > >
              >
              > I agree that various source-based sticky options (IP, port; network) are not the
              > best solution. In our current implementation we can't do this because the SW load
              > balancer is based on filtering IP packets on the driver level.
              >
              > Currently I'm more interested in understanding whether it can our SW load balancer
              > can work with your replication at all?
              >
              > What makes me think that it could work is that in WLS6.0 a session failed over
              > to any cluster node can recover the replicated session.
              >
              > Can there be a problem with the cookies?
              > - are the P/S for replication put in the cookie by the node itself or by the proxy/HW
              > load balancer?
              >
              > >
              > >The options are -Dweblogic.debug.DebugReplication=true and
              > >-Dweblogic.debug.DebugReplicationDetails=true
              > >
              >
              > Great, thanks!
              >
              > Regards,
              > Frank Olsen
              

  • Credit Memo process in 3rd party order

    Hello All,
    Once 3rd party invoice is completed process as follows: (standard process)
    sale order --> Purchase Requisition --> Purchase Order --> Goods Receipt --> Invoice Verification --> Customer Invoice.
    When you post the customer invoice to accounting, in general system will update
    1.Net Value    2. COGS (Cost of goods sold)   3. Sales Qty.
    Now the scenario is when the vendor cancel his original invoice and reissue the invoice (due to change in price / change in stock item and so on..),
    We have to cancel the customer invoice and issue credit memo invoice (without any reference) for the customer.
    But the problem here is.. when we post the credit invoice to accounting, COGS will not be updated (currently they are adjusting COGS value manually).
    How can we map this scenario ? while creating credit memo invoice we should consider some reference so that COGS should be updated.

    Hello Suresh,
    THERE ARE TWO SCENARIOS HERE.
    Scenario is when the vendor cancel his original invoice and reissue the invoice (due to change in price / change in stock item and so on..),We have to cancel the customer invoice and issue credit memo invoice (without any reference) for the customer.
    > IF THE VENDOR GRANTS YOU A CREDIT MEMO ON THE QUANTITY OR VALUE BASIS, YOU CAN DIRECTLY PASS ON THIS TO CUSTOMER BY RAISING CREDIT MEMO (THIRD PARTY CREDIT MEMO IS G2S), THIS WORKS WITH ITEM CATEGORY 'TASG' (THIRD PARTY CREDIT MEMO ITEM). THE SALES RELEVANT INDICATOR ' F' IS SET IN CUSTOMISING FOR SALES FOR THIS ITEM CATEGORY. THIS MEANS THAT THE COST IS NOT CREATED.
    --->IF THE VENDOR CALCULATES ADDITIONAL COSTS FOR YOU ONCE THE THIRD PARTY BUSINESS TRANSACTIONS HAVE ALREADY BEEN BILLED. THE COSTS FROM THE INVOICE RECEIPT ARE THEN CORRECTED IN THE CUSTOMER BILLING DOCUMENT WHICH HAVE ALREADY BEEN CREATED. SUBSEQUENT DEBITS FROM THE INVOICE RECEIPTS ARE COPIED TO PROFITABILITY ANALYSIS AS A DIFFERENCE AMOUNT. THIS MEANS THAT THE COST IS UPDATED HERE ALSO. IN ACCRUED PROFITABILITY ANALYSIS, THE COSTS ARE NOT COPIED FROM THE INVOICE RECEIPT, BUT FROM THE CUSTOMER BILLING DOCUMENT.
    EXAMPLE:In the context of a third-party business transaction, you create a sales order for over 100 pieces.
    A purchase requisition and a purchase order are generated. Ten pieces are delivered to the customer, and a billing document is then sent to the customer when the 10 pieces are delivered. The vendor sets a subsequent debit of 100 USD for shipping costs in the invoice. The cost is nowupdated in the billing document created, and in the profitability analysis (in this case, it is raised
    by 100 USD).

  • 3rd party SO with rejected item appears in billing due list ( VF04 )

    Hi
    There are 7 items in a SO ( 3RD PARTY PROCESS ) . One of the items ( POSNR 030 ) is rejected  ( reason for rejection is applied at the item level ). The item is rejected from the linked Pur Req & PO as well. For this rejected item there is no GR doc
    The balance items on the SO are invoiced.
    Problem : This SO still appears appears in the billing due list.
    Expectation : This SO should not appear in VF04
    Other details : Item cat TAS billing Rel B. Billing qty VTFA is E & the update doc flow is checked
    Things tried :
    1) In debug mode changed the overall billing status in VBUP & VBUK to C
    2) In SA38 executed reorganisation of index prog ( RVVI50 - -- ), SDVBUK00.
    Pl. help

    Hi
    I have done the things suggested by Caprin + Sanjeev Kumar. No help
    Here is additional info. . As i am working on this issue i could replicate it in the quality server . I have found out how the issue was caused.
    There is a inconsistency between PO delivery date & SO req delivery date. In 3rd party orders the Sch line date is derivied from Vendor info records. The user created SO & PO .The SO got its Sch line date from info record. Then the user manually changed the Requested del date on the SO beyond the sch line date derived from the info record & at the same time leaving the Del date on PO untouched. This has resulted in mismatch between the PO & SO at the same time weird looking sch lines on SO ( the order + rounded qty is on the later date whereas the confirmed qty on the 1st sch line ).
    I feel if somebody can suggesta program to bring in sync the VBAP + VBEP + PO line item tables i think it will solve the issue

  • PO no of customer in ORDERS05 IDoc with 3rd party scenario

    Hello experts,
    we have the scenario where we are getting purchase orders from our customer (which is in the same system like we are). Then we create SO for the customer and a PO to the external vendor. The goods should be delivered directly to the customer.
    In that 3rd party scenario we will send our PO via ORDERS05 IDoc to the vendor. Once the vendor is shipping the goods, he sends us an ASN and we create a statistical GR.
    Now our target is to give our customer somehow the information, that the delivery shipped from the vendor will be based on his PO to us. Do you know a way how we can give his PO no. to the vendor in the SAP standard ORDERS05 IDoc? Otherwise, is there a standard process to send our customer also the information that we received the ASN from vendor and transfer this information (maybe also as an ASN) to the customer with his PO no., so he can create an inbound delivery already?
    Thanks.

    Follow this Procedure... it works....
    Procedure
    1. Review the number ranges that have been created: The number ranges for the business partner in the Best Practices are defined as follows:
    IMG u2192 Cross Application Components u2192 SAP Business Partner u2192 Business Partner u2192 Basic Settings u2192 Number Ranges and Groupings u2192 Define Number Ranges
    01: The Regular business partner uses this number range: 2100000000 to 2199999999 and 03: 7100000000 to 7199999999 is used in the setting above for the ship-to party. Both are internal number ranges.
    XX is the external number assignment used to create the SD reference customer.
    2. The account group DEBI must temporarily be assigned to this external number assignment for the creation of this business partner:
    IMG u2192 Financial Accounting u2192 Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable u2192 Customer Accounts u2192 Master Data u2192 Preparations for creation customer master data u2192 Assign Number Ranges to Customer Account Groups:
    Set account group: DEBI to external number range XX for the Business Partner creation step.
    3. Create an SD customer:
    Call transaction XD01: Easy Access u2192 Logistics u2192 Sales and Distribution u2192 Master Data u2192 Business Partner u2192 Customer u2192 Create u2192 Complete
    u2022 Select account group: Customer (general)
    u2022 Enter the Customer key: MUST_ALL
    u2022 Enter company code (1000)
    u2022 Enter sales area as follows:
    u2022 Sales organization: 1000,
    u2022 Distribution channel: 01
    u2022 Division: 10.
    u2022 Select Continue.
    Assign MUST_ALL in Master data>bp>settings for creating standard customers.

  • Third party remittance issue - no documents created

    hi All,
    When I am excuting Third party remittance for an employee I am getting status as: Evaluated! no documents created. When I checked in PCP0, the document is created. After checking the status in PCP0 I am executing 3rd party payroll and below log is displayed:
    Remittance evaluation run 9999999999
    Status                                   Evaluated ! No documents created
    Personnel number selected: 1
    Personnel number evaluated 1
    personnel number rejected 0
    personnel number skipped 0
    Number of errors 0
    No of warnings  0
    Can an one please help me on this issue.  
    Thanks,
    Sai

    hi Michael,
    The employee payroll has been successful. Post payroll execution we have done FI Posting and document has been created for the posting which we have checked through PCP0.
    Can you please help on this issue.
    Thanks,
    Sai

  • Need to do invoice verification even PO price is zero due to 3rd party sale

    Dear friends,
    AR complained he is not be able to do invoice with message " Billing quantity is zero"
    After diagnosis, I found out it's a third party sales order..followed by Purchase order, becasue materials are free stock, thus PO has no unit cost..,after we issue GR, our AP can't to invoice verification (MIRO) due to PO priced is zero, which cause AR is not be able to invoice.
    I temporarily solve the problem by reverse the GR, addn cost in PO, followed GR(MIGO) and IR (MIRO), at MIRO I adjust GL to offset the balance to price variance, in this way ,we don't need to actually pay vendor. Then AR is able to do invoice
    My question is If there is any way that enable me to  invoice verification even if PO price is zero to enable further customer invoice for third party sales process.
    Your advice will be deeply appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Linda
    Edited by: Linda Gao on Jun 29, 2011 8:33 PM

    A real 3rd party order does not need a goods receipt.
    it only needs an invoice receipt which in turn enables billing to the customer.
    As a free of charge delivery is usually not billed, this process is not possible in SAP without modification.
    compare OSS Note 498162 - FAQ: Third-party order processing in purchasing:
    1. Question:
    Why is a free of charge third-party item not possible?
    Answer:
    In the standard system it is not planned to generate a free of charge item during third-party order processing, here an invoice receipt is required. The invoice receipt updates the purchase order history.Without this update, there is no confirmation stating that the order was delivered.This is controlled by item category table T163 and indicators REPOS and REPOV here.If you want to use free of charge items for 'Third-party', you have to set field REPOV for item category 5 to ' ' in table T163.You have to carry out the changes with Transaction SE16.This is a modification.

Maybe you are looking for