3rd party SO with rejected item appears in billing due list ( VF04 )

Hi
There are 7 items in a SO ( 3RD PARTY PROCESS ) . One of the items ( POSNR 030 ) is rejected ( reason for rejection is applied at the item level ). The item is rejected from the linked Pur Req & PO as well. For this rejected item there is no GR doc
The balance items on the SO are invoiced.
Problem : This SO still appears appears in the billing due list.
Expectation : This SO should not appear in VF04
Other details : Item cat TAS billing Rel B. Billing qty VTFA is E & the update doc flow is checked
Things tried :
1) In debug mode changed the overall billing status in VBUP & VBUK to C
2) In SA38 executed reorganisation of index prog ( RVVI50 - -- ), SDVBUK00.
Pl. help

Hi
I have done the things suggested by Caprin + Sanjeev Kumar. No help
Here is additional info. . As i am working on this issue i could replicate it in the quality server . I have found out how the issue was caused.
There is a inconsistency between PO delivery date & SO req delivery date. In 3rd party orders the Sch line date is derivied from Vendor info records. The user created SO & PO .The SO got its Sch line date from info record. Then the user manually changed the Requested del date on the SO beyond the sch line date derived from the info record & at the same time leaving the Del date on PO untouched. This has resulted in mismatch between the PO & SO at the same time weird looking sch lines on SO ( the order + rounded qty is on the later date whereas the confirmed qty on the 1st sch line ).
I feel if somebody can suggesta program to bring in sync the VBAP + VBEP + PO line item tables i think it will solve the issue

Similar Messages

Quotation is appearing in Billing due list: VF04

Dear gurus,
I am facing an issue with VF04. I am using a scrap process: Quotation --> Order --> Invoice. Now when I am using VF04 for Order related billing, Quotations are appearing in billing due list which should not be. Please guide me how can I resolve this issue.
Awaiting your feedback.
Regards.

Hi
In the standard system the item category AGN is NOT relevant for billing.
You can check in your client 000 to confirm it it delivered with no billing
relevance in VOV7.
If it was set to billing rel 'B' when the quotation was created then that document
will have a billing relevance (VBAP-FKREL = 'B') in this case changing the
billing relevance in VOV7 will not correct that document in retrospect.
When the VBAP-FKREL is filled then a billing index will be generated for
the line. You can check this in table VKDFS. When you have an entry in
table VKDFS the document will automatically appear in VF04.
You have to
1) correct the customising TVAP-FKREL = ' '.
2) Adapt the billing relevance in existing documents to current customizing
See report ZZFKREL0 from note 127514.
3) Run RVV05IVB to remove the unwanted VKDFS entries
Hope thisw helps you further
All the best
Brian

Third party sales orders are not showing in Billing due list (VF04 )

Hi,
In Billing due list Third party sales orders are not appearing because VKDFS table those entries are there. How can we get Third party sales orders in VKDFS table as well as VF04 ?
Please suggest me.
Regards,
KUR

Hi Kur & Sandepp,
Check this notes:A) Note 210500 - Billing status of a third-party item,B)2) Note 210561 - When is a third-party item displayed in VF04.
Re
Regards,
Madhu.

Delivery from project appearing in billing due list

Hi,
We have a scenario in which delivery is done through project (Tcode CNS0) and the billing is done through sales order (order related billing)
The delivery type LP used for the delivery is not assigned to billing type since we are not supposed to do billing with respect to delivery document.
But these delivery documents are appearing in billing due list (VF04) and remain there in the due list
We want delivery documents (from project) NOT to appear in the billing due list.
Please help.

Hi Shambhu,
Lets assume ZLP is not relevant for billing and if delivery is done then how can excise invoice ibe generated.
Issue is delivery doc type LP is assigned to billing type which is meant for excise invoice and not assigned to billing type of final invoice.
Now in India, why LP is assigned to excise invoice billing type, because for every delivery excise invoice is created.
But for the same delivery type LP in europe, excise is not created and hence these documents remain there in billing due list.
The issue can only be resolved if europe starts using another delivery type like ZLP which is not assigned to any billing type, but again that seems to be very difficult to implement at this moment of time.
Thanks Shambhu.

Item billing plan lines not appearing in billing due list ...

Hello Team ,
I have one question on service contract billing plan. Contract has status released.
I have one contract which has header billing plan that is applicable at line item also.
1. At line item level billing plan two items are due for billing but in billing due list this line item does not appear. Some of the lines in Item billing plan are already billed.
Also at item billing plan there is no check (tick mark) for Header Billing Plan.
Can some one suggest what are the possible checks for item billing plan not appearing in billing due list.
Thanks ,
Nitn Patki

Hi Nitin,
Check the status of the line items.
Regards
Narayana

3rd party order not appearing in billing due list

Any 3rd party sales order is not appearing in VF04. all the copy control configuration is standard.
i checked many SAP notes. we are able to update the status by using SDVBUK00 program but that cannot be run for all the days. any idea if there is any other root cause?
when we check the status of the field VBUK-FKSAK it is blank. when we run the program SDVBUK00 it changes it to the desired value of A.
Edited by: Nimit Kaul on Nov 8, 2010 1:44 PM

Did you check the below OSS notes? Also check the allied notes in it.
1) Note 210500 - Billing status of a third-party item
2) Note 210561 - When is a third-party item displayed in VF04?
Per this notes, check the item relevance for billing in t.code VOV7 and set the value as B - order related in accordance with order quantity or value as F-order-related in accordance with invoice receipt quantity and check.
Regards,

Third Party Orders not appearing in billing due list. Item Cat billing rel 'F' & VTFA Billing Qty E

I had a requirement to do my customer billing for third party scenario before doing the invoice verification.
The solution that was proposed was to make the following changes,
In VOV7 (For TAS )item category the billing relevance should be (G) and
in the copy control VTFA at item level for item cat (TAS)maintain the billing qty(E).
http://scn.sap.com/thread/3522580
The problem I faced with the above config change was that nothing was appearing in the billing due list and when I tried to do a billing from the order directly, it would not let me.
Then I made the following change,
In VOV7 (For TAS )item category the billing relevance as (F) and
in the copy control VTFA at item level for item cat (TAS)maintained the billing qty(E).
Now after the MIGO is done based on the PO, the system allows me to do a customer billing from the SO before the invoice verification. But still this SO is still not appearing in the billing due list. Have any of you experts faced the same problem? How can I get this to appear in the billing due list? Or in other words, how do I identify open third party sales orders that are due for billing?
Thanks and regards
ES

@ Joan, in that case invoice verification would now be necessary anymore right? In my case i need the invoice verification to happen...but at a later stage
With the existing config...i.e. F as billing relevance and E as billing quantity, I now tried doing a MIRO immediately after the MIGO and then it appears in the billing due list. So basically I think its the billing relevance F...and if I want it to come in VFO4 before MIRO, perhaps a tweak in the logic of VFO4 to include billing relevance F + billing quantity E ?

Documents with billingblocks should not appear in billing due list

Dear all
we have a requirement that in VF04 when i select both delivery related and no docs with billing block it is still showing the documents which have billing block in the sales order header .
pls let me know is there any thing i can do to avoid the delievry documents which have billing block in header of sales document doesnt appear in the billing due list.
regards
baranidharan

Hi Baranidharan,
As per the standard For order related billing
The billing block at header level is taken into account in the billing due list, the billing block at item level is not relevant
Your requirement is
Avoid the delievry documents which have billing block in header of sales document doesnt appear in the billing due list.
So you copy the standard programe then do the changes as per your requirement with the help of ABAPer.
I hope it will help you,
Regards,
Murali.

Document still appears on Billing Due List after creation of Credit Memo

Hello everyone!
I would like to seek your help in knowing the reason why documents in the Billing Due List dated on or before June 30, 2008 with billing type ZRJF would require three creations of Credit Memo before the delivery returns status will change from "being processed" to "completed." Please note that there was a configuration made on June 31, 2008 in the copy control of ZREF to ZRBO wherein the pos./neg. quantity of item cat ZRBO was changed from to (+).
Moreover, what should I do with the documents in VF04 dated on or before June 30, 2008 that still appears after one creation of credit memo?
Thanks in advance. Have a great day to all!

Hi Ravi,
Thanks for your prompt response. I checked the delivery return status and it is still "being processed" eventhough I have already created a credit memo for all the returned goods.
I actually observe this in my documents dated on or before June 31, 2008. At that time, the copy control pos./neg. quantity was set to negative (-). Is this the reason why documents still appear in the billing due list? If so, what should I with these documents so it will no longer appear in the Billing Due List?
Thank you very much!

Item not relevant for Billing but still exist in Billing due list VF04

Hi Experts,
I am experiencing an issue where this is an STO scenario.
The PO->DN->PGI->GR (Receiving plant) where there is no invoice required as its with the same company.
However, I can see there is one Delivery still getting reflected in VF04 due list.
Standard Delivery type NL has been used and already checked the item categoy relevance and its
maintained as J ( Relevant for deliveries across EU countries.) I dont think so this was billed earlier as I had already checked the Deliveries created with same item category for past six months and they have not been billed.
Is there any other settings that needed to be checked apart from item cateogry and verifying how the same combination of Delivery type and item category worked earlier?
IBest Regards,
Ramesh

Dear Ramesh,
You may be right that with the same item category settings, there were no billing item generated (with the billing indicator as J in your Item Category) earlier. But how now it is happenning the other way round.
Here are the reasons:
The outbound delivery is relevant for billing if: (YOUR PRESENT CASE)
1. The Plants abroad active field is selected (found in Customizing under Financial Accounting -> Financial Accounting Global Settings -> Tax on Sales/Purchases -> Basic Settings -> Plants Abroad -> Activate Plants Abroad)
2. Country of departure (country where the plant is located) and destination country (country where the ship-to party is located) need to be different EU countries.
So, if you dont satisfy the above two conditions you will not get the billing item and that's what has happenned in your past 6 Months.
Regards
Edited by: SAP2020 on Nov 13, 2009 4:41 AM

Billing Due list data is not appearing

We have created Service Contract. After releasing this Service Contract, Billing data is not appearing in Billing due list. Please provide info on how to make it appear.

Hi Raghavendra,
Please define a billing unit and assign the Sales/Service Org to Billing Unit and in turn assign the billing unit to Company code.
And define item categories for CRM Billing and define item category determination as well.
Regards,
Maddy

Billing Due List shows third party sales orders that have no SGR

Hello,
I've run into an issue where the billing due list (VF04) shows sales documents that have not gone through statistical goods receipt. In our normal flow we create a sales order, which automatically creates a purchase requisition (PR). We create a purchase order (PO) from the PR and when we generate a shipping notification (ASN) we also do a statistical goods receipt, which kicks off billing.
Normally items show up in the billing due list based on the billing type of the sales order item category. In this case that indicator is B - relevant for order-related billing on the basis of the order quantity. My understanding is that it should not show up in the billing due list until goods receipt, which is not happening for us. We're seeing sales orders based on non-SGR'd PO's in the billing due list.
Also, in sales to billing copy control (vtfa) the billing quantity indicator is E - Goods receipt less invoiced quantity.
Any ideas? Have I provided enough info? Thanks in advance!

Kapil,
Thank you very much! However, a setting of 'F' only seems to show line items in the Billing Due List after I create a vendor invoice. We are not using vendor invoices for our process and I want items to show up in the Billing Due List after the GRN. Are you saying that you think items should show up in the Billing Due List after the GRN? I know SAP doco kind hints to that, but I did try a setting of 'F' and it does not work; the items only show up after I create a vendor invoice.
Any other info or guidance is greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Mark

Can i use a 3rd party superdrive with my Macbook Air?

Hi,
As my title says, Can i use a 3rd party superdrive with my Macbook Air rather than the Apple drive?
Thanks.

Mark Thornton wrote:
Hi,
As my title says, Can i use a 3rd party superdrive with my Macbook Air rather than the Apple drive?
Thanks.
This one works just awesome:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16827136201&cmre=external_dvd_burner_usb-_-27-136-201--Product

Sales analysis w.r.t 3rd party processing with different vendors

Hi friends,
I am new to this group. My requirement is to find list of materials ordered by customer procured by different third party vendors.
e.g There is a sales order from a customer and I have items of which 2 are procured from a 3rd party Vendor and 1 item is produced.
Is there any transaction through which shows how much we procure and how much we procured from 3rd party vendor
Please help
Thank
Best Regards
Santosh

Hello,
no there's not a transaction showing the information you need. You can build a query or a report, according to the level of complexity, to get the information.
On top of that you should consider this:
if the materials procured externally have different codes than materials produced, with transaction ME2M you can get the list of Purchase Order items according to the material code;
if, as often it happens, in Sales Order, you have an item category dedicated to 3rd party items, you can extract from table VBAP the list of Sales Orders items with that item category, and get material codes and quantities of materials procured in that way;
Best regards,
Andrea

How to make sales order items appear on the billing due list?

Dear All,
We are using SAP CRM 5.0 standalone and we want to use CRM Billing.
All necessary configuration has been done to enable CRM Billing on sales orders.
Here is the list of what have been done:
1. Defined Billing unit and assigned to my sales organization.
2. Created billing document type for sales order (F2 as standard).
3. Defined billing item category (TAN as transaction-based billing after complete)
4. Defined billing item category determination (for trans. type TA, item category TAN, billing item category will be TAN)
With all the above configuration, when I created a sales order (TA), set the order status to 'completed' and save it, I checked the item status, it is 'completed for billing'. However, when I ran 'Process Billing Due List', nothing has been picked up.
I checked the order line item, and found that the 'Delivered Qty' field is 0. Could this be the reason? I set the item category TAN billing relevancy to be 'Transaction-based after completion', then it should not care about delivery, right?
Please provide your input. Thanks so much in advance!
Regards,
Leon

Dear Rekha,
Thanks for your detailed reply. It seems that all the config points you mentioned in your email have already been covered. However I still don't see anything on my billing due list.
Here is the list of what have been done:
1. Defined Billing unit and assigned to my sales organization.
2. Created billing document type for sales order (F2 as standard).
3. Defined billing item category (TAN as transaction-based billing after complete)
4. Defined billing item category determination (for trans. type TA, item category TAN, billing item category will be TAN)
With all the above configuration, when I created a sales order (TA), set the order status to 'completed' and save it, I checked the item status, it is 'completed for billing'. However, when I ran 'Process Billing Due List', nothing has been picked up.
I checked the order line item, and found that the 'Delivered Qty' field is 0. Could this be the reason? I set the item category TAN billing relevancy to be 'Transaction-based after completion', then it should not care about delivery, right?
Please provide your input. Thanks so much in advance!
Regards,
Leon

3rd party SO with rejected item appears in billing due list ( VF04 )

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for