4.3.1 -- Overall performance declined

Why has the update to 4.3 made the performance of my 3GS decline? It has annoyed me to no end that every iPhone update cripples an older iPhone. I have updated to 4.3.1 hoping it would fix the stupid glitches. The graphics are horrible: when I open up a program or double tap for multitasking, the graphics aren't nearly as smooth as they were on 4.2.1.; my battery performance ***** and I barely use my iPhone. All I do is text and manually check my mail throughout the day. When I was on 4.2.1, I could open a bunch of apps, check mail frequently, text frequently, use Safari, and still have about 50% battery left; response to any touch is rather sticky, such as texting or sliding the lock slider to unlock; I keep having issues with connecting to the cellular network; app store previews and app store lists use to load super fast and now are laggish.. it takes a while for the icon of the app to show up as well (and I'm in the same area, so I know it's not the connection).
Restore and resets don't work--I get the same kind of performance. What's going on? Hopefully Apple listens to the complaints rather than ignoring them to get people to upgrade.

Same issue with me. I lost a percent about every 2 minutes. I was previously on iOS 4.1.
Here's what I posted in another thread:
Background: iPhone 3GS ver. iOS 4.1 | iTunes 10.2
Action: Update iOS from 4.1 to 4.3.1 with no issues identified
I skipped iOS 4.3 due to Apple's pattern of initial iOS buggy releases. A lot of iPhone users who upgraded from iOS 4.3 to 4.3.1 state that they did notice a battery life improvement. However, this is a false comparison. Here's my case. How would you make a creditable statement about improved battery life coming from a bad iOS 4.3 which reduced the battery life. A valid comparison would be upgrading prior to iOS 4.3 to iOS 4.3.1. This is my situation and noticed the battery life was not improved, but worse. I tired the following to adjust the battery:
1. Run the battery down and recharge to 100%. This is suppose to recalibrate it.
2. Reset using the Home button and the power button
3. Hard reset (had to reinstall everything) / factory setting
I also noticed there is a increase lag time switching from applications.
I am in agreement that another update will be due.

Similar Messages

  • Performance decline after moving to a faster server

    Hi,
    we are running a simple web applications - just servlets - on an older Windows NT Server with two Pentium two 233 MHz CPUs. The performance on the server was acceptable and pages showed up pretty quickly in the browsers.
    Now we bought a new server (still Windows NT) with two Pentium III Xeon 8xx MHz CPUs (same amount of memory) and moved the application to the new server. We expected that the performance would increase because of the faster CPUs but the opposite happened. Our first tests showed a dramatic increase of response time. Pages that showed up in just one or two seconds on the old server, now take ten and more seconds to show up.
    We start OC4J with the same java runtime parameters as on the old server. Also the configuration of the Apache server that we use a front end to OC4J did not change.
    Does anyone have an idea how this performance decline is possible? Shouldn't it be faster on fastes CPUs?

    Ideally you should have a faster response when you moved your apps to a new server. The slow performance could be due to
    several reasons that includes server setup, network problem. So please look at your server setup and network.
    regards
    Debu

  • Ios8 affecting Iphone 4s wifi, overall performance. Sluggish, lagging, freezing.

    ios8 affecting Iphone 4s wifi, overall performance. Sluggish, lagging, freezing.
    Seeking support to undo update?

    my 4S was also affected following the iOS 8.0 update, really slow. A restore from backup (done just before restoring) solved that.I don't think 8.0.2 will help, it's not meant to fix this, while a restore from backup will reinstate settings and data properly, getting you rid of unneeded junk left by the upgrade (temp stuff etc...).

  • Fields/Tables to locate most recent overall performance rating of employee

    Hi,
    I'm looking for the table names and fields that would be involved in determining a person's latest performance rating.  I've spotted  the latest date in HRHAP, but want to be able to tie this to a personnel number and a field that hopefully links to text (Good, Very Good??) regarding the employee's overall rating.  Thanks for any help!
    Zaj

    Hi Zajebiscie
    Love the name!
    Depending upon your implementation (i.e. - if you're using EHP4), you can also rely on HRP7409 (which uses Central Person as the key) to pull the previous performance rating.  For any of these choices though, you're going to have to take the value and the scale and go against the text lookup table to find out what that actual value is.  So in this hypothetical, you'd look at HRP7409 for the max ENDDA of the the CP you're looking for.  Then you'd take the PERFORMANCE field and the SCALE_ID field and go up against T77SP where SCALE_ID = SCALE_ID and PERFORMANCE = RATING and return PSTEXT.
    That way, if your company chooses to change scale year over year, your query will accomodate the change in scale values without skewing past data.
    Let me know if you have any questions.
    Thanks,
    Chris

  • Where is the Query overall performance is checked??

    Hello BW Experts,
    Where is the Overall Query Performance can be checked??
    Is it:
    1.RSMO
    2.RSBBM
    3.SU01
    4.Table RSDDSTAT(something like this, if its not correct)
    Plz throw some light on this also <u>plz explain what and all could actually be checked or verified</u> in that!!
    Thanks and regrads,
    Sapster.
    <i>I always assign points.</i>

    Hi,
    RSRT is the one transaction to check query performance (pls correct if iam wrong!)
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/3f66ba90-0201-0010-ac8d-b61d8fd9abe9
    here is the docu abt the query performance.
    hope this helps.
    thanks & regards,
    LS.

  • Overall Performance is very slow

    Hi,
    I have 4GB in PI-DEV and 4GB in BI-DEV server, BI server is running very good and fast, but PI-DEV performace is very very slow even it take 5 munites to login myself...
    There is no user login in DEV server... NW 7.0 2004s, Windows 2003 OS, Patch level 16. oracle 10g
    Is anyone tell me step by step how do i check performacne issue... i read performance book but not that help
    Thanks in Advanced...

    Sorry for late Reply
    Basically I have PI-DEV and BI-DEV system and both system has only 4GB memory and same location same network, same patch level 16, same kernal level, under windows 2003 server, and Oracle DB, but different instance... some reason in PI-DEV performance is very slow only Integration Engine...
    when I go SXMB_MONI it take more then process 20 munites one transaction, as i maintion before
    I checked both memory paramaters are same like configTools
    I checked database table space
    I checked heap memory paramaters
    I deleted AFG_XI_MSG table entries no messages are hold
    sometihng really wrong in Integration Engine

  • HR infotype log in PCL4 and overall performance

    Hi there,
    There has been a few threads about PCL4 performance with regards to reading, but I have a slightly different question:
    We are working on an export program for HR masterdata and are considering using logging in PCL4 to be able to export only changed fields in the infotypes. To achieve this we need to add quite alot of extra fields and infotypes to the configuration in the IMG.
    Does anyone have any experience about how additional fields and infotypes affect runtime and database performance of the system? How optimized is the system with regards to writing to this cluster?
    It will obviously cause more data to be logged, and the database will grow slightly faster, but does it decrease responsiveness of PA30/40 for the end users? Is it possible to archive old data from this cluster? I'm guessing that it won't be a big problem, but any feedback is greatly appreciated.
    Best regards,
    Lars G. Gudbrandsen

    Hi Lars,
    Probably you would get a better response in the HCM section as opposed to ABAP.
    Maybe you can use change pointers, and badis rather, to acheive what you want but I am not 100% sure the requirement.
    Additional fields and infotypes don't impact the system negatively in my opinion. It wouldn't affect PA30, unless the specific infotype is selected and then provided if it has been correctly created in PM01 it should be fine, also depending how many fields you are talking about of course. PA40 would only be impacted for those transacitons for which the infotype is included.
    As for archiving, I am not sure, but once again i think HCM forum is your best bet.

  • 5th Gen. iPod overall performance

    I need opinions on this:
    while playing a song, if I start skipping songs, eventually I hit about a 5+ second lag before it even loads the text for the selected song. I wouldn't have thought this was weird except for the fact that, on a 20GB iPod (color screen), the song selecting seemed much more instantanious with only a 2 or so second lag before loading the new song. This seems to be the case with browsing the photo library as well.
    Is this abnormal behavior for my 5th Gen. iPod with just over 16GB of data on it? I didn't check how much space was being used on the 20GB iPod, but does this sound abnormal at all? Should it be performing faster, or is this all relative to how much of the hard drive is being used?

    Hacking or modding any iPod goes against Apple's policies for proper use, hence it is not permitted, as per the Terms of Use, to discuss such things on Apple Discussions.
    I would suggest visiting some other iPod forums (ilounge.com perhaps) to discuss this.
    You're more likely to get a reply if you post there.

  • Server Performance Declines

    Hello There,
    We are working on SAP XI 3.0 - with SP9. The server gets
    tediously slow once more that two users try to work simultaneously on the same. We have tried working on SAP XI 3.0 SR1 as well, but!, have found the same problem here as well!. What could be the possible reasons for this performance deterioration ?. Please advise asap.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Venkat.

    Venkat,
    I do not have an answer to the question you posted. However, it will be helpful if you present your question in the proper context so that someone can answer you.
    Whenever we say "performance is slow", you probably can give us the hardware (Example - on 2 CPU (2GHz), 2GB Window 2003 server) and tell the activity you are doing (example - sending a document from A to B with size N Byte) and it takes M seconds when we use with 1 user and maybe 2M or 3M if we use 2 similar users. Moreover, you can give some OS counters too to find out whether your problem is CPU bound or memory bound or something else. You can say, with 1 user doing the activity, CPU is some %. We can make it more precise with additional information and which will help you to receive proper responses.
    Thanks,
    Swapan

  • OSB Monitoring - Any impact/overhead on overall performance?

    Hi all,
    We are trying to use the out of the box feature of monitoring in OSB to capture the processing times for each message including service callouts.
    We have been able to use it well and find the results realistic.
    One thing that we want to confirm is the impact/overhead involved by enabling monitoring in OSB.
    We did do some sample runs to capture the results with and without monitoring enabled, but did not find any significant difference.
    Going by the general understand of similar EAI tools, we expect that there will be some overhead involved by enabling monitoring.
    Can anyone confirm this? If yes, what is that we can do to minimize the impact?
    Please give your comments/suggestions on this.
    Thanks,
    Patrick

    Hi Anuj,
    We are using the OSB built-in feature monitoring to measure the performance. We enable the monitoring at Action Level in the proxy service Operational Settings.
    Then when we fire some sample requests, we get to capture the actual performance metrics at every stage of the ProxyService on the Dashboard under the Service Health tab.
    OSB gives the performance metrics like total message count that were processed, the average processing time, maximum processing time, etc ...
    Let me know if you need more information.
    Thanks,
    Patrick

  • PS5 tool menus and overall performance

    Hi,
    I have a 17inch MacBook Pro, 2.3 GHz, 6GB of RAM, OS X Lion 10.7.2.
    I have just reinstalled adobe PS 5.1 thinking it would solve a problem, but it didn't.
    Right now, everytime I click on a tool in the tool bar, the tool activates fine, unless I have to hold down the buton to get the full menu for a specific tool. If I do need for example to get the Dodge Tool, and need to hold the Burn Tool in order to get there, the drop menu stalls for 5-6 seconds, than I can choose the tool, and then it stalls for another 6 seconds, and then I'm able to use the tool.
    I have had a much less powerful computer which is running CS5.1 just fine (in this case even better!).
    Can someone help me with this issue??
    Thanks,
    Jonathan

    Boilerplate-text:
    Are Photoshop and OS fully updated?
    As with all unexplainable Photoshop-problems you might try trashing the prefs (after making sure all customized presets like Actions, Patterns, Brushes etc. have been saved and making a note of the Preferences you’ve changed) by keeping command-alt-shift pressed on starting the program or starting from a new user-account.
    System Maintenance (repairing permissions, purging PRAM, running cron-scripts, cleaning caches, etc.) might also be beneficial, Onyx has been recommended for such tasks.
    http://www.apple.com/downloads/macosx/system_disk_utilities/onyx.html
    Weeding out bad fonts never seems to be a bad idea, either. (Validate your fonts in Font Book and remove the bad ones.)
    If 3rd party plug-ins are installed try disabling them to verify if one of those may be responsible for the problem.
    Does turning off OpenGL in the Performance Preferences and restarting Photoshop have any bearing on the issue?

  • A2107A-F Improved Speed and overall performance

     Last night I was able to make some major performance enhancements to the 2 tablets. Far any of you that are interested have a look here
    http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=35983141&postcount=377
    If you have any further questions just ask
    I've had a lot of devices through the years. With those years and devices comes a little bit of knowledge that may be of use here.

    I followed your guide and was inpsired to do these COD tweaks on all my Android devices (Droid 3 and Droid x2) will they also work?
    More importantly have you exp. any issues with HD play back? I havn't been able to fix this at all. Its really laggy on this device. 
    Do you have a safe list of things that we can freeze as well? There is a desktop app that you can freeze in Titanium which pretty much disables the home screen..i.e. dont freeze it. Im trying to get rid of most of this bloat ware.
    Thanks!

  • T400s Question of RAM and overall performance

    I have a T400s.  P9600 @ 3.53 GHz, 4 GB of RAM, Windows 7 64bit, 64 GB Solid state hard drive
    Recently while writing my Masters thesis using microsoft word, the computer was very slow and had difficulties switching between Microsoft office 2003 Word and Excel.  The Word doc. became rather large, filled with pics and files, etc. However working on other desktop computers with much slower processors and less RAM available I had no difficulties. 
    Furthermore, I used my wife's notebook, from another company, that has the same processor and RAM but operates on a 32 bit system and has a much better video card with 512 MB of memory with no problems.  Also, when monitoring the system performance I never see the RAM operating at higher than 34% which the 64 bit system needs to operate.  The last observation is what leads me to believe something is not working properly with my notebook that is only 6 months old. 
    Other than this issue this is the best computer I have ever owned, but I bought it mainly because it was ranked as the most powerful notebook in the industry, and I have problems with Microsoft office??
    Is there a problem with using Office 2003 with windows 7 64bit?
    Is this caused by the performance of the video card?
    Or is there an issue with my RAM or Notebook?

    A few questions:
    1) Has the performance always been this way, or is it a new occurance.
    2) Which video card do you have?  If you are using the integrated intel video make sure you have the most up to date Windows7 drivers from Lenovo, if that doesn't seem to help you could try different releases to see which performs the best, a good way to see if the video is the issue is to do something video intensive (1080p video or the likes).  It is somewhat unlikely that the video driver could influence the speed of office however since for the most part these are non-graphic intensive apps.  Another thing would be to try using the Windows Basic theme, if you still have issues it is unlikely the video card.
    3) There are alot of factors which can influence memory usage in 64bit windows, keep in mind in most situations only 64 bit applications can access memory above 3gb.  What is the size of the page file?    If the system is reporting the full amount of memory it is unlikely that it isn't available to the system.   34% of your ram seems high for just the system since my 3gb system has 1.1 gb in use with firefox, aim, openoffice.org and all the lenovo apps and avira anti virus going.
    4) What antivirus software are you using, has the system been scanned recently and have you tried to reproduce the issue with the antivirus disabled?
    5) How full is your HD.  Even with SSD's things slow down quite a bit as the drive reaches it's capacity..  64GB is a little on the tight side for Windows7.
    Thinkpad T500-2081 CTO | T9400 2.53GHz | 8 GB RAM | ATI HD3650 + Intel GM45 | 15.4" LED WXGA+ | Windows 8 | ATI Catalyst 13.1 (non-switchable)
    Thinkpad 390x | PII 333 | 256mb ram | NeoMagic 256AV | SVGA LCD | OS/2 v4.52

  • MBP 13'' 2.53GHz overall performance

    I've just got a new MBP 13'' 2.53GHz and I'm quite disappointed about its performance.
    Out of the box, it takes ~90 seconds from turning on to the login screen and another 40 seconds from logging in to get Finder ready to use. There are no applications running at login time. I've read that having 4GB of RAM takes longer to boot but it doesn't feel right when it's more than 2 minutes.
    I can live with this boot time but then, for example, starting Safari for the first time takes 15 seconds. And so does any application.
    Finder is slow too, it takes up to 10 seconds to show the size of the .app files in the Applications folder. I've never seen the beach ball as often as with this new MBP.
    I've already reset the PRAM several times, no improvement.
    I've run the Test utility that comes with the Applications Install DVD and found no errors. Boot in verbose mode doesn't show anything weird.
    Any help is much appreciated.
    Thanks

    I've just returned from the Apple Store, actually it's a Premium Reseller, we don't have Apple stores in Argentina.
    Anyway, I left my MPB13 (250GB stock HD) three days ago, today they called me because it was ready. When I get there, they told me that they didn't find anything wrong with it. I've asked to talk to the technician, he said that it's normal to have the beachball from time to time. I explained to him that it's more than that and ran the AJA System Test (http://www.aja.com/products/software/) where you can see that the HD performance drops to almost 0 MB/s when reading a 512MB file. After showing that, he took the laptop again. While I was waiting for him to return, I've run the same test on another MPB13 that they were showing. It didn't have the 1.7 firmware and the performance was a steady ~70MB/s writing and reading. Bottom line, they kept my MPB, they will look more into it and probably change the HD and memory (that's what he said).
    So, it's not over but at least they recognized that something is not right. I've also mentioned this thread were they can find more information.
    I recommend this AJA System Test, I've run it in several Macs and the performance is always constant not like my MBP13 with EFI 1.7.

  • After upgradingin iPhone 4 to iOS 7 the response time of the keyboard is dead slow (basically not able to write) and overall performance is a real challenge. Any ideas?

    After upgrade to IOS 7, the iPhone of my wife is dead slow. It takes at least 10 seconds that the virtual keyboard responds and even the passlock reaction to the inputs is very much delayed. Like this she is not able to do write any messages or emails.
    Any ideas what can help?

    Thank you!! I was getting very worried about upgrading.

Maybe you are looking for