545 automatically proposed without BOM defination for by product

When idoc tries to post the subsequent adjustment (121 mvt type), the consumption is posting with 545 mvt type instead of 543. And hence the stock is adding to vendor instead of consumption.
I couldnt able to exactly nail the scenario when it is happening, since most of the cases system posting with right mvt type 543 and occasionaly the movement type 545 is getting posted.
Further analysed on this issue and in the most of the times there was an 544 posting happened before 545...so iam thinking reversal of subsequent adjustment is causing this problem.
Requesting you to shed some light on this and what are all the instance 545 will be used? Thanks for all your help in advance.

Yes,  this is Idoc independent scenario.
This problem occurs not all the time. I have posted 543 through subsequent adjustment. due to some problem i cancelled the document "544". Then again when i am trying to consume through 543 for the same materials the system now suggest 545. There is no BY PRODUCT maintained in the BOM. How does this situation arrives sometimes.
The same process when simulated in the testing environment with the exact details work perfectly. and allows 543 if if a 543 and 544 was posted earlier.
Most interesting thing is the problem only happens for some line items in the subsequent adjustment, but rest of them work perfectly.
what should i check in that case. As per my analysis something very silly is happening but i am not able to catch the same. Can you please help me on this issue.
i DONT THINK THIS IS SOMETHING RELATED TO CUSTOMIZING OR A TRANSPORTABLE CHANGE, BECAUSE WITH THE 
"EXACT" SAME DATA THE SCENARIO IS WORKING PERFECTLY IN TESTING CLIENT.
Edited by: RajKiran Mohanty on Jul 8, 2009 1:57 AM

Similar Messages

  • Purchase requisition generate for alternative bom use for finished product

    i hav alternative BOM for finished product in which different raw material component in both BOM of same finished product.But when i RUN MRP that time only one raw material requisition generate another alternative bom raw material requision not generate.
       Is there any option when i RUN MRP that time we select one of the alternative bom component of  raw material for generation purchase requisition.
    Thnaks in Advance

    Dear ,
    MRP will select the BOM based on the MRP4-BOM Explosion tab -Selection Indicator .It can eitehr of these ways :
    1.Maintain Production Version with  different Alternative BOM  and keep Selection Indicator -3 .So sysetm will look into only the Valaidty  and lot size of the Production version and select the correct BOM to explode  and generate PR for depednts based on stock situation
    2.If you maintain Blank -then it will look into order qty and select the BOM according ly
    As in your case , selection methods 3 will fit  and you need to maintain PV with correct validity and lot size in MMR-MRP4-PV option .
    Try in sand box with different lot size and validity with indicator-3 .Create Order and run MRP-MD02-1,,3,3,3,2
    Check and revert
    Regards
    JH

  • How to create  the BOM for co product

    Dear friends,
    How to create the BOM for Co product  and How the production will create and  how the costing will capture for that.
    Regards,
    Sabhapathy R

    Dear Umesh,
    How Bom created for co product
    By product
    Header
    xxx
    101
    mvt
    mvt
    qty
    item
    yyy
    261
    1
    zzz
    531
    0.5-
    By product
    Same way how we create co product for BOM. pl explain with simple example.
    Thanks &regards,
    Sabhapathy R

  • Elements 13 : 1. Is there a way to stop the automatic proposal for exemption? 2. Is there any way or an update for the manipulation of the color curves like in Gimp or Paintshop?

    Elements 13 : 1. Is there a way to stop the automatic proposal for exemption?
                           2. Is there any way or an update for the manipulation of the color
                               curves like in Gimp or Paintshop?
                                                        Dankeschön für jede Antwort die weiter hilft!!

    Hey Rich,
    It is true that you cannot add more than 250 plots to a 2d-axis graph in the REPORT.  One work around is to have the graphs stacked on top of each other and plot 250 to one graph and 250 more to another graph.  I am including a TDR (you have to unzip it) file that has 12 2d-axis stacked on top of each other.  Most of the properties have been made invisible through the graph properties.  You can still see the legends however.  One caveat to this is that you will have issues accessing the different graphs.  You have to do it from a VBScript.  The following line of code worked for me:
    Call GraphObjOpen("2DAxis" + Str(NewAxis))
    Where NewAxis is a variable that defines which graph I want to look at.  You would of course have to loop through the graphs as you add data. 
    Cheers,
    jigg
    CTA, CLA
    teststandhelp.com
    ~Will work for kudos and/or BBQ~
    Attachments:
    12PlotStack.zip ‏12 KB

  • Having been without my Mac for a month I've been using iCloud mail. The new mail boxes that I set up there do not automatically show up in Mail on my replacement Mac. Is there any way to transfer them from ICloud mail to Mail?

    Having been without my Mac for a month I've been using iCloud mail.on a PC. The new mail boxes that I set up there do not automatically show up in Mail on my replacement Mac. Is there any way to transfer them from ICloud mail to Mail? Thanks.

    sure pretty simple.  make a backup of your current settings
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1766?viewlocale=en_US
    then restore device from old backup you need pics off of
    then import pics to computer
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4083
    you may need to save pics to camera roll first
    then restore the new backup and sync pics back to phone via itunes
    Peace, Clyde

  • Costing for shearing orders without BOM

    The client is into sheet metal stamping. The input materials for pressing are steel sheets in different sizes. Each FG can be produced from only one specific sized sheet.
    These sheets are ideally to be procured directly in the required cut sizes. But in case of unavailability of the sheets in the required size, and due to high requirements, these sheets are obtained by carrying out shearing activity. In this, the required cut sizes are obtained by shearing other larger size sheets. Also, some other off-cuts might be produced while carrying out the shearing.
    This being the regular scene here, we have defined the sheets as HALB.
    But the possibilities of making a particular sheet from the other available sheets are vast. Again from a single sheet many other sheets (as co-products) are possible to be manufactured along with scrap(as bi-product). This makes it impossible to make any BOMs for the particular sheet.
    The problem for this scenario is in costing. We can create a order showing the material to be produced, the co-products and the bi-products (All entered manually in order)  but we are not sure how the costing will happen.
    The material being HALB is given the price control S, and being BOMs are not maintained, the prices are not updated through costing run.
    We have tried with both the price controls S and V. In both cases the costs of the materials are not updated through production orders.
    Can you suggest some answer as to how the costing of the sheets would happen?

    Hi,
    As per your issue, you are not maintainnig  both Co product and By product in Header BOM. instead your are adding the both material during the prodution order creation.
    But Prerequisites is for both, should be defined as line item for Header material Bom.
    1.Co product cost will be  inclued in production order
    For costing of co product  u have to defien  apportionment structure in material master  ,to specifiey  how the total costs should be distributed over the main product and the co-products.
    2.By product cost will be Deducted  from Production order cost.
    For details information see the following SAP link,
    url=http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/b1/c04fc6439a11d189410000e829fbbd/frameset.htm]Co product &  By product[/url]
    One more clarrification , for
    " This makes it impossible to make any BOMs for the particular sheet" - why, if you shearing a sheet from larger one, u will have stock for required size sheet for Material .... why dont u create BOM...
    once u create BOM it will solve your problem. if it usefull reward othrewise ignore
    regards
    pradeep

  • In sub contract PO no error shown for without BOM material..

    Dear All,
    I am creating subcontracting PO with item catagory "L" for material "XYZ" and for material "XYZ" i have not created any BOM.
    Then also system is not giving any error while saving PO.
    Generally it should give the error "Not possible to determine any components"
    Also in mesage determination i have assigned mesage ME154 as error still it is not showing as error.
    What could be the reason and what need to do to solve the same.
    Naren

    Dear Jurgen,
    If it is giving an error i will able to use the notes...
    Here i am not getting an error which is my concern
    what i should do to get the error if i am putting material without BOM in PO andnot entering any components..
    Naren

  • How do you crop a vertical slide to a constraint size without turning it on it's side? iPhoto 6 automatically rotated the crop box for a vertical slide (picture).

    How do you crop a vertical slide to a constraint size without turning it on it's side? iPhoto 6 automatically rotated the crop box for a vertical slide (picture).

    Select the aspect ratio first.
    Then go back to the same menu and go to the bottom and selectConstrait as portrait.
    OT

  • Automatic Payment program: Payment method not defined for vendor abroad

    Hi All,
    I have a situation wherein the client has a company code in Poland . The Company code is trying to make a payment via f110 to a vendor based in sweden. The vendor wants payment to the invoice to be made in Polish Currency i.e. it wants clearing to be done in Company codes local currency.
    But F110 is throwing the error Payment method not defined for vendor abroad. Can you suggest what could be the possible Error.
    Regards
    Nitin

    Nitin,
    Have you followed the above advice, i.e. used the same medium format just allowing foreign payments for it?
    AFAIK, the Poland banks require a separate format for foreign payments, if only because international bank nbr SWIFT has to also be given and not just the IBAN.
    At my company, the Deutsche Bank Poland requested IDocs to be set up instead, I'm working on it now..
    thanks

  • Route not determing automatically at sales order level for some sales order

    Dear All ,
    Route not determing automatically at sales order level  for some sales orders.We are using automatic route determination without wt group,eventhough we have configured the required settings
    I have checked all the forums but didn't find any solution for the same.
    Looking for your inputs .
    Thanks inadvance
    Regards
    Venkat

    Hi
    1. Copare the Routes which are Automatically determined and which are not automatically determined
    2. Have you mainted this route to be RELEVANT FOR TRANSPORTATION without this check route will not get picked up.
    SPRO > Logistic General > Shipping > Basic Shipping Function > Routes > Define Routes > Define Routes and stages > Select the Route and check for it's settings > CHECK MARK Relevant for Transport. Without this check the route will not get picked up as of my understanding.
    Thanks
    RB

  • Exchange rate diff. accts are not defined for account 16145110currency INR

    Dear SAP Gurrus,
    I am facing a problem while making  payment against invoice, receiving payment against invoice, clearing advance payment and  advance receipts through T-code F-53, F-28, F-44 and F-32.  System is allowing me to select the invoices against which I want to do the clearing but when I go for simulation I am getting the following error -
    ' Exchange rate diff. accts are not defined for account 16145110currency INR'.
    When I click on the error message the performance assistant gives methe following details:
    Exchange rate diff.accts are not defined for account 16145110 currency INR
    Message no. F5062
    Diagnosis
    The accounts for posting the exchange rate differences could not be determined. For the specified G/L account and the specified currency key, no corresponding exchange rate difference accounts were determined.
    System Response
    The system cannot generate the exchange rate difference posting.
    Procedure
    By pressing ENTER, you achieve that the document is reset to a status without automatic posting. In another window, you can complete the default settings for exchange rate differences and post the document afterwards.
    Proceed
    My client is local. Even the local currency is set to 'INR'. There is no foreign currency involced while making invoices, payment and receitps.  Eventhough the system is giving me error.  As a result I am not able to clear open items. Please give me some feasible solution so that I can clear the open items.
    Thanks in advance
    Regards
    Shreyas Wani

    hi,
    As you said, you are not maintaining any Exchange rate differences, It may not be required a Exch rate Diffrences account.
    Please check whether you have created any Group / Parrallel curencies etc in co.code level.
    Please go through the notes 209580 / 89531, hope it helps you.
    Regards
    Kanna

  • Is there a situation where we create a production order without BOM/Rtg ?

    What I see in the system, I was able to create a prod order without maintaining master data for PP ( expect material master)
    Is there a situation/scenario where we create a production order without BOM, Rtg
    Does the above situation applies to scenario like special procurement key ( 40- stock transfer from other plant )
    Please clarify

    Pradeep,
    Thank you for detailed answer
    Round robin of discussions
    When you covert a planned order to a prod order with reference to a material (CO40), it will ask for routing
    if rtg is not maintained for the material, the system will automatically pick the default rtg from OPJG
    When you create a prod order ( without ref to a material- C007), say suppose for unplanned rework we have
    maintain the rtg and BOM manually to the prod order
    Lastly, FOR SPk - 40 ( Stock Transport) for the issuing plant both BOM & Rtg needs to be maintained in the recieveing & issuing plant
    Due points have been assigned

  • Production order creating without BOM and Routing

    create the production orders without bom and routing
    they confirm the order
    they want to stop confirmation if production without bom and routing
    is it possible to set error or warning message
    my first doubt is how can we confirm the order without bom and routing
    i think it can be solved by production order type
    please reply

    Hi,
    You can make it mandatory by following ways :
    Go to OPPQ -> Select your plant-> Go to BOM / Routing Selection in that you need to maintain BOM Sel ID & Routing Sel ID which is having selection ID with usage 1 Production which will make it mandatory to create BOM & ROuting with usage 1 & need to be selected while creation & saving Production ORder.
    Also, you can maintain another config. for making routing mandatory at Order type level :
    Go to OPL8 -> Select Plant & Order type-> Routing Selection
    Maintain 5     Routing/ref. op. set mandatory (manual selection)
    or          6     Routing mandatory (automatic selection)
    This setting will ensure without routing your order will not be saved.
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Tejas

  • Process Order without BOM

    I want to create a Process Order without a BOM & Recipe . Is that Possible ?
    I tried the following :
    Material Master setting  MRP 4 view -Explosion/Dependent Requirements section define " "(Blank) for Selection Method field
    Order Type Dependent parameters (COR4)
    Production Version Blank :
    Recipe: Do not use Master Recipe
    But the problem is that I cannot keep BOM application Blank
    BOM application has the link for selection ID which is linked to BOM usage .
    I am not able to bypass this check in any way & as a result it gives an error (No valid BOM) on Process order creation
    Shall appreciate a response

    Hi,
    Yes, it is possible to create process order without BOM & master recipe.
    By having some config settings in place for BOM & recipe selection, you can create process order without BOM & recipe in SAP.
    Normally, this scenario comes into picture where you're not sure about the operations to be carried out and materials to be consumed for an order.
    For creating and testing such scenario, refer below SCN thread, which was discussed before,
    Create Process order without Production Version | SCN
    Regards,
    Narresh

  • Service Order - Automatic proposal of services

    Dear Experts,
    For a service order, for a specific item say "Engine" I should automatically propose the following service operations.
    000001:     Engine
         0001:     Change out engine
               0010 :     Remove all electrical connections     4 hr     2     8hr
                0020:     Disconnect Fuel System          2hr     2     4hr
         0002:     Oil change
               0010:     Remove plug and Drain oil          2hr     1     2hr
               0020:     Re-install oil plug          1hr     1     1hr
    To be more clear,
    For Engine, we have two services proposed automatically
          1) Change out engine
          2) Oil change
    If I select Oil Change, the following services are proposed automatically,
        0010:     Remove plug and Drain oil          2hr     1     2hr
        0020:     Re-install oil plug          1hr     1     1hr
    How can this request be acheived.
    Regards,
    Kanthimathi

    Hi,
    You can have a look at the following short video which demonstrates the Product Proposal Functionality about which you are talking.
    [SAP CRM 7.0 - Integration of ERP BOM Information in the CRM Product Proposal|http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/90ba6669-e7cc-2b10-aba3-9972fb3114f3]
    [Product Proposals in the Interaction Center|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_crm40/helpdata/en/04/753fe6e3e800409ca5bfdfa24849fd/content.htm]
    [Product Proposals in Sales Transactions|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_crm60/helpdata/en/47/46ef11ea211a52e10000000a1553f7/content.htm]
    Hope this will help.
    Thanks,
    Samantak.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Mac OS 10.4.10

    I have an old macbook bought more than 2 years ago, it's working perfectly fine. I'll be replacing my HDD with a bigger capacity. Unfortunately, I lost my mac OS X 10.4 cd installer. Can I directly install a XP pro OS or I need first to load my OS X

  • Moving files from PowerMac G3 to MacBook Pro

    I have a new MacBook Pro and am moving files from all my old macs onto it. I found an old beige desktop PowerPC hard drive but don't have a monitor for it. Also, I have ancient 3.5 floppies that I need to read and the old beige computer has a slot fo

  • How can I get the row number of display automatically on a table?

    I have a table of measurements, and I would like the row number to be displayed on each row. The challenge is that each time I run the program, the total number of rows will be different, so I would like the numbers to update every time I run the pro

  • Alltypes to pdf

    Hi all, There is a sample process in workbench for "AllTypesToPdf". My requirement is to convert word, excel, powerpoint files to pdf. As per the documentation this AllTypesToPdf will convert all the three process. I have installed: MS Office and Ope

  • Substitution of VO not reflected

    Hi, I substituted XxsliAsgSummaryVO in place of AsgSummaryVO in HRSS Online Payslip. I could see XxsliAsgSummaryVO in Business Components section of About page. But When I add one field from XxsliAsgSummaryVO and gone back to Payslip to see the chang