8i on Linux Shipment notice

Well folks, now we know. It's not shipping until the last week
of May, probably June. I was kind of hanging around - waiting
for the Linux version rather than trying it on NT.
Oh well.
Steve
null

Rick Rankin (guest) wrote:
: Well Steve, be prepared to buy more memory. I've loaded 8i on
my
: NT box and I had to bump the memory up to 256M. It is a hog.
: There are plenty of new features but you are going to pay for
: them with resources. Perhaps the footprint is smaller under
: Linux. Certainly the performance is better on Linux, almost an
: order of magnitude in my estimation (for 8.0).
Up until now my scripts to create new databases on both Oracle7
and 8 used to give the SYSTEM tablespace about 50M. THis was
always more than enough for creation of the database. With
Oracle8i I ran out of room with only 50M, so I had to bump it up
to 75M. I'm almost positive this is due to the JServer objects.
null

Similar Messages

EDI mapping for Shipment notice - SHPMNT05 to 940

Hi,
I had to map the SHPMNT05 IDOC to an EDI 940 structure. Was wondering if this is the right way to go for Shipment notices to Warehouses and if someone had a template for this particular mapping.
Thanks,
Karun.

Hi,
You can try this by making use of preceding-sibling and following-sibling axes in XSLT..after S, u can put a
<xsl:if test following-sibling::ns0:ReadDataFromOutput[ns0:segment='O']> and try same with rest of the segement.

OM Advanced Shipment Notice (ASN)

Hi,
Can anyone provide me Advanced Shipment Notice (ASN) query.
Thanks

Hi 2795332
Please find below the query, you will find asn in rcv_shipment_headers. Select additional columns that should help.
SELECT porh.segment1,
           porl.line_num,
           pord.distribution_num,
           ooh.order_number
           sales_order,
           ool.line_number so_line_num,
           rsh.receipt_num,
           rcv.transaction_type
FROM oe_order_headers_all ooh,
          po_requisition_headers_all porh,
          po_requisition_lines_all porl,
          po_req_distributions_all pord,
          oe_order_lines_all ool,
          po_system_parameters_all posp,
          rcv_shipment_headers rsh,
          rcv_transactions rcv
WHERE ool.order_source_id = posp.order_source_id
   AND porh.org_id = posp.org_id
   AND porh.requisition_header_id = ool.source_document_id
   AND porl.requisition_line_id = ool.source_document_line_id
   AND porh.requisition_header_id = porl.requisition_header_id
   AND porl.requisition_line_id = pord.requisition_line_id
   AND porl.requisition_line_id = rcv.requisition_line_id
   AND pord.distribution_id = rcv.req_distribution_id
   AND rcv.shipment_header_id = rsh.shipment_header_id;
Thanks
Mirza Tanzeel

Has anyone gotten a shipment notice on iphone 4s (att white) 32gb?

Many of my friends have gotten notices on 16gb phones but I've not gotten one yet.

I just saw it!
Chek Lap Kok, Hong Kong
10/11/2011
9:22 P.M.
Departure Scan
10/11/2011
5:35 P.M.
Arrival Scan
Shenzhen, China
10/11/2011
3:45 P.M.
Departure Scan
10/11/2011
5:58 A.M.
Origin Scan
China
10/11/2011
9:31 P.M.
Order Processed: Ready for UPS
so it left a day later than my friends' I wonder why. but I guess I will still get it by th 14th.
Phew.. Thanks! you are a genius!

Advance Shipment Notice

Hi All,
We have a need to send an email as a ASN for certain ship to partners. The notification will be send once a day and will contain the information of all shipments on that day to the ship to person. What is the best way to do this? Users wanted a Z table and a Z program that reads all GI and sends ASN based on entries (Ship to numbers and email id's) maintained in the Z table. I could see some standard SAP solutions but cannot really find one that suits my need.
Regards,
Hari.

Hi Hari,
We did come across this kind of requirment which was fulfilled by creating a report which captures the relevant information required and finally the output of the report basing on the country of the customer we have designed the required language layouts. Finally, we have prepared a Zemail program which runs at regular intervals through a batch job which sends email to the customers for whom the emaild id is configured in that program.
Hope this information helps you. Pl. reward if you find it useful.
Thanks & Regards
Sadhu Kishore

TGW on Linux - log files not deleting

I have been running TGW 3.5 for a few months on Linux and noticed the disk space is full. It seems the TGW logs are not clearing out. I have had to manually delete loads of log files.
From the logs there seems to be a process which checks how long the logs have been there but for some reason not deleting them.

By design TGW doesn't clear out old log files thinking that it would help in troubleshooting. But we are planning to enhance it by clearing log files older than x number of days..
As you mentioned, the current fix is to manually clear out old log files. How often do you have to clear the logs ? Probably increasing available diskspace may help reduce iterations for cleaning up old logs ...

Desktop Search for Linux (Beagle, Kat or Collective Cortex)

I'm already running collective cortex, but thought an Arch package for others might be a good idea. I'm also getting ready to test Beagle and Kat to see how they compare.

whaler wrote:
Linux offers many ways to search for files and most of them are too involved for my memory-challenged head... (besides, I never seem to sort out the difference(s) between 'locate' and 'slocate', not to mention 'mlocate'(???). F.ex. PCLOS has 'locate', but not 'slocate'. In Bluewhite64, it is the opposite, while Archlinux offers both...). For the CLI pros, I suspect grep is the most powerful.
Anyway, apart from KDE's own search app, what is the best KDE GUI tool if I want to swiftly inspect files *anywhere* on my system?
I have previously tried Beagle (Ubuntu) and it apparently has a KDE cousin named KBeagle. Then there is Strigi, and on Vector Linux I noticed something called GTKFind which I have not seen anywhere else.
What do you all consider the best desktop file search app available for Arch?
i *highly* recommend recoll (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=8161). it has no direct kde integration, it's a qt app, but very versatile.
vlad
Last edited by DonVla (2008-04-11 17:36:34)

Why does COMCAST work so hard to prevent me from taking advantage of MOCA/XB3?

I apologize in advance for the length of this post and its frustrated tone but I've spent so much time and effort trying to accomplish something that should have been quite straightforward with COMCAST but which has left me with a very biter taste in my mouth. I hope to get the attention of other concerned COMCAST customers in similar situations and the ears of people at COMCAST who can make a difference and change their current misguided policies and business models around MOCA. I also vent because of the long standing vexing problem of not being able to get the full use of the XFinity Internet I've been paying for every month for the last thirten years despite the recent availability of standardized network distribution technology in the form of MOCA 2.0 which is advertised by COMCAST as a feature of multiple versions of their latest Wireless Internet Gateways which customers are paying for but yet unable to utilize. See: http://www.cedmagazine.com/news/2013/04/comcast-bows-faster-gateway-doubles-speeds-on-2-data-tiers In a blog post on Comcast’s site, Rob Slinkard, senior vice president, product management, communications and data services, wrote that while data tiers have increased their speeds over the years, thanks in part to DOCSIS 3.0 deployments, in-home wireless gateways aren’t always capable of passing those faster speeds around a home. Coupled with the plethora of devices in subscribers homes, an inefficient wireless gateway can be a chokepoint in subscribers’ home networks.
“Today we are launching a new device that solves this problem and creates the fastest in-home wireless network available anywhere in the U.S.,” Slinkard wrote. “The new Xfinity Wireless Gateway includes the 5.0 GHz radio frequency. This new frequency is being used by many of the latest consumer electronic products (like the iPhone 5, iPad 4 and Kindle Fire HD) and results in better speed and performance from connected devices.
“It also has been built to a new standard (MoCA 2.0), which allows the device to leverage a home’s existing coaxial cable network to create a faster and more efficient network of connected devices within the home.” It has been several years since I started this troublesome journey to extend WiFi/Internet access to my living room. My Comcast cable modem/eMTA and wireless gateway is installed upstairs on one side of my home and no matter what Wireless AP device or technology I use I cannot get a strong WiFi signal downstairs especially in my living room, kitchen and dining room where a majority of my Internet access takes place. In particular, my phones and tablets sometimes drop off the WiFi network due to dead-zones and I'm unable to successfully stream any movies at even a low 2-3Mbits on my media center or streaming devices, sometimes even for home movies stored on my personal server upstairs which is connected directly to the COMCAST Wireless gateway at Gigabit speeds. Over the years, I've spent hundreds of dollars on various WiFi access points, extenders, multiple powerline adapters etc.. all to no benefit. Unfortunately my decade-old home was not built with structured wiring and the AC power lines must be too noisy for powerline AV to work any better than WiFi and so I'm stuck with at most 1-3 Mbps of sustained bandwidth from my living room to both my personal media server upstairs and the Internet. This low speed, unreliable Internet access in the center of my home entertainment area is completely unacceptable to me. Then I learnt this year from Comcast's own press releases like the one quoted above in cedmagazine that their newest Wireless gateways (Cisco DPC3939 or Technicolor TC8706C) are equipped with MOCA 2.0. MOCA is designed exactly for the kind of network distribution problem that I have. MOCA takes the Internet/Ethernet and sends it over the already laid down cable/coaxial lines in your home at high speed using the unused bandwidth available on the coax wires. It is standardized and is pretty much plug and play if you have the devices. In theory with MOCA anyone can have a fully networked high speed broadband home relying on just the coaxial wiring that most homes already have. After years of changing my WiFi access points multiple times looking for better coverage, I finally decided to try the COMCAST all-in-one Wireless Internet Gateway and eMTA (Technicolor wireless Gateway 1) but after lots of troubles with poor signal reception, frequent disconnection/drops and faulty DNS configuration that cannot be changed by the end-user, I decided to request a change to the more capable XB3 Wireless Gateway 2 with MOCA 2.0 whole-house networking features. I started a web chat with the Comcast technical representative that worked in the department for gateway replacement. I told her about my WiFi distribution problem and that I already had the Technicolor Gateway and that I needed to get Gateway 2 -- the so-called XB3. She was very quick to tell me that she knew *exactly* what I wanted and had dealt with this before. I went into detail about MOCA, about the lack of MOCA 2.0 adapters available to purchase by consumers and that she should make sure that my replacement XB3 kit came with the necessary MOCA -> Ethernet adapter or MOCA WiFi AP that I would need to extend the Comcast Internet service to my living room. She acknowledged everything, said she was creating notes about MOCA adapter for the dept that would ship out the XB3. I couldn't believe how easy it was to order the XB3 and required MOCA adapter/WiFi AP. I was so pleasantly suprised and impressed by the customer service I thought I had received from Comcast. I made sure to give her the best review scores when the chat was complete and a Comcast survey was presented to me. Later I received a FedEx shipment notice and a few days later I was shocked when I opened the package to see that I had been shipped the exact same Technicolor (non-MOCA) single band WiFi gateway (Gateway 1) which I already had and which I had specifically told the customer support agent that I did not want again. I was shocked at the deception and false promises that I had received from this Comcast customer support specialist. Even though the entire chat conversation was recorded, she had no problem lying to me directly that she was sending me an XB3 when she clearly had no intention of doing so. I later took this unwanted Technicolor Wireless Gateway 1 back to the Comcast store in Auburn WA and there the customer service representative argued with me over and over about MOCA and it was clear that he had no idea what MOCA was or why it is such a boon to anyone who has problems getting WiFi coverage in a home. He also stated that he knew nothing about XB3 boxes and that the Comcast store did not have any and that he couldn't find any information about XB3 in his computer. He also gave me a Motorola HD PVR which he said was newer than the really ancient one I had but which still had component outputs for my older TV unlike the X1 (to my knowledge). A few weeks later, I went back again to the same store and requested an XB3 Wireless gateway 2. This time the customer service agent I spoke to seemed to have some idea that MOCA existed (she said she had it installed in her home) but then insisted that I could not get an XB3 with MOCA *unless* I also ordered an X1 Comcast HD PVR. Also she said that it required professional installation and I would be charged for that even though all I wanted in the first place was just the XB3 MOCA Gateway. I asked her if the XB3 kit came with a MOCA -> Ethernet adapter or MOCA WiFi AP for the living room and then it became clear that she really either did not understand the use of MOCA for network distribution or she was playing dumb. She kept on insisting that Comcast does *NOT* provide any MOCA adapters or WiFi access points to use with the XB3 to extend the home network. Frustrated, I kept on asking her why there was a required bundling of MOCA Wireless gateway with a specific model of COMCAST DVR that I didn't want and she just insisted that was the way things had to be done. I also explained to her that I had an older Plasma TV without HDMI inputs. She finally went to talk to her supervisor and came out with a XB3 and an X1 HD DVR. I didn't want the X1 but I was very eager to get a chance to use MOCA to allow me to use my Comcast Xfinity Internet reliably downstairs. I figured that perhaps the the new X1 PVR had a built-in MOCA client and an Ethernet port with which I could use to plug in my own WiFi access point and thus have both 100% signal strength downstairs as well as high bandwidth hardwired network link backhaul upstairs back to the XB3. Last night, I finally installed the XBR3 after multiple false starts with the device sometimes refusing to complete activation or losing complete connectivity to my hardwired PC, turned on MOCA (which was disabled by default) and then tried to install the X1 DVR but suddenly discovered at 1AM in the morning that the X1 really didn't have any component outputs. There was no way to hook it up to my TV. Anyway, I wanted so badly to get MOCA as a network extender working that didn't care at that point about the TV and just wanted to make sure that the MOCA worked. The XB3 upstairs said that it detected 2 MOCA devices in my home, everything looks good although it would have been nicer if the XB3 detailed what devices were connected via MOCA and perhaps what version of MOCA they were using. Anyway, since I could not see the X1 screen on my TV or perform any setup I may have needed to do to setup MOCA on the X1, I gave up with that and tried the older non-X1 Motorola DVR (DCX3501M/MOR200BN) which some googling showed that it too actually supported MOCA (see http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/11/motorola-rolls-out-the-latest-hd-dvr-the-dcx3501-m/) as well though it was not an X1 model. I setup the Motorola DVR and after it was activated, I plugged the media center into the the back of the Motorola DVR's ethernet port. The media center showed that it was trying to acquire an IP address but no matter what it could not succeed. I called up COMCAST technical support again. It was 1:30AM. As usual the technical customer service representative had no idea what MOCA was and couldn't even clarify if it was possible to connect my streaming media device into the back of the Motorola DVR using an Ethernet cable and get Internet access that way via MOCA. In all my encounters with COMCAST support personel so far I've noticed that they all claim to know what MOCA is but yet keep on saying things that demonstrate clearly that they have no idea what it it is, how it works, why a consumer would want to use it for network distribution and most shockingly have no idea whether or how MOCA home networking is supported by Comcast products. This representative insisted over and over that I needed to setup a truck roll appointment for a technician to help me troubleshoot my MOCA/DVR issue but yet she would not clarify the simple question about whether COMCAST supported the use of the Ethernet port on the Motorola DVR to provide Internet access to begin with and she was not willing to pass me on to a support person who knew what MOCA was and how it was supported by COMCAST. What was the point of staying at home to wait for a technician to troubleshoot a device scenario that may not even be supported by COMCAST to begin with? Are all these COMCAST technical support representatives not even trained on the products that COMCAST is selling/installing in our homes? Why are they all clueless about MOCA technology even though COMCAST itself touts this feature in every press release about their new Wireless Gateways? The very unhelpful customer service agent rudely transfered me to another number without any warning, the number had a recorded message saying nobody was available and then hung up on me. Now, that is the kind of customer service I'm used to from COMCAST. I spent the next 30 minutes googling Comcast X1 DVR to figure out if any of the new ones supported component outputs and ended up learning more than I wanted to about Comcast RNG reference designs, X1/X2 software and finally the important fact that the Comcast X1 HD DVR has two variants manufactured by two seperate companies PACE and ARRIS and that one of the variants by PACE has on-board component outputs. That is the X1 DVR that the local Auburn store support person should have given me after I had told her that I did not have HDMI inputs on my TV. It was 2:30am. This morning I called up COMCAST technical support again and the representative I spoke to was quite helpful at first with helping to determine that my Auburn COMCAST store had a dozen+ units of the X1 DVR with component outputs. He also gave me a free 90days HBO due to all the time I've wasted driving back and forths to the Comcast store and getting/returning products, which was nice although I usually don't watch premium cable channels or much TV anyway; but still an appreciated gesture. Now that I was going to get an X1 DVR that would work with my TV and which I had reason to believe had on-board MOCA for Internet access, I asked the tech support representative if COMCAST did not sell or rent a MOCA 2.0 -> Ethernet adapter or WiFi AP, how was I going to use this X1 to extend the Internet downstairs for my mobile devices and to my TV for streaming movies? That simple question seemed to unnerve him for some reason. Once I got into this questioning about MOCA it was deja-vu all over again. He claimed to fully understand MOCA, claimed that the X1 used it to access applications and the Internet but insisted that I need to have a truck-roll again to my home from the Wifi experts to "troubleshoot" my WiFi distribution problem. Geez. I'd already been through these unreasonable conversations before multiple times! I tried to explain that I did not want or need any truck roll (more importantly, I'm not taking a day off work to wait for a house visit). I didn't need someone to troubleshoot something if the support personal himself doesn't even know if it is supported to begin with. While trying to explain that all I was asking for was an answer if the X1 exposed the Internet via it's rear Ethernet port or how otherwise I was supposed to access the Internet via the MOCA coax outlet, the line was dropped. Again, the typical COMCAST customer support. I've done a lot more research on MOCA and COMCAST and my thinking now is that the possible reason why COMCAST goes out of its way to make it very difficult for consumers to deploy MOCA whole house networking using its gear and why every single one of their representatives I've spoken to about MOCA home networking have acted very antagonistic towards that topic is because COMCAST does *NOT* want customers to learn about or utilize MOCA for whole house networking unless they are using a locked-in MOCA that works only with COMCAST proprietary video on demand, DVR/Cloud-DVR and other closed ecosystem multimedia entertainment products. Basically, a COMCAST customer who can have easy high speed broadband wired and wireless access in every room of their house via MOCA 2.0 is also a customer that may be tempted to start using over-the-top Internet television, streaming and entertainment services such as Amazon Instant Video, Dramatize, DramaFever, Crackle, HBO, Hulu, myTV, NetD, Netflix, NowTV, Qello, RPI TV, WhereverTV and Chromecast that are not controlled by COMCAST and which COMCAST makes no extra money off of you when you do it in every room of your home due to the power of MOCA and the accessibility of COAX conenctors in most rooms of most homes. Basically COMCAST touts MOCA 2.0 and puts it into their latest Wireless gateways, DVRs and set top boxes not to help their customers easily have high speed whole house inter-networking but ONLY for the purpose of exploiting your in-home COAX wiring for their closed multimedia services like AnyRoom DVR etc.. That is why they allow their X1 and other DVRs and set top boxes to access the Internet via MOCA but then disable the rear ethernet ports so that your own entertainment streaming devices cannot also make use of the fast broadband connection. That is also why some of the COMCAST employees I've tried to get help from have stated in no uncertain terms that COMCAST will not sell or rent to me any device that allows my own devices to access the high speed MOCA 2.0 broadband connection that I pay for every month with my Xfinity Triple Play and Wireless Gateway rental fees. Look right here where COMCAST explains the benefits of the two main Wireless Gateways it rents to customers: http://customer.comcast.com/help-and-support/internet/wireless-gateway-compare/For the Wireless Gateway 2 which I'm currently renting from them, COMCAST clearly marks out that this Gateway offers "MOCA". COMCAST then explains what MOCA is:
"MoCA: Multimedia over Coax Alliance. MoCA is a universal standard for home networking over the in-home coaxial cable. MoCA can be used to extend the Wi-Fi range of the Wireless Gateway 2, using a Wireless Ethernet Coax Bridge (WEC." Note though that COMCAST refuses to sell or rent you that Wireless Ethernet Coax Bridge to make use of your spanking new MOCA. At least that is what several COMCAST technical and support persons have told me. That document above though, is a COMCAST document aimed at current and future customers and it clearly explains the benefits of MOCA. But yet I'm supposed to believe that out of the six or so COMCAST technical and customer support personel I've spoken to about MOCA not a single one of them knows about this obvious purpose of MOCA and that they all refuse to rent or sell me equipment that allows my own devices to use the high speed MOCA broadband Internet that their own devices such as the X1 can access inside my home? I'm also supposed to believe that it is a coincidence that COMCAST spends the time, effort and cost to build in MOCA 2.0 into their DVRs and settop boxes but then blocks access to make use of it via the Ethernet ports on all their MOCA capable set top boxes and DVRs? These devices are all rented by COMCAST and they charge hefty monthly bills for it but then they disable my full use of the technology which I've already paid for? Finally, I wanted to find a store where I could buy my own MOCA 2.0 Wireless Ethernet Coax Bridge or MOCA compatible Wireless Access point in order to bypass COMCAST's blatent attempt to monopolize MOCA wholehouse broadband for just its own entertainment services. I couldn't find any ! It turns out that not a single manufacturer of MOCA 2.0 products (head-unit or adapters) will agree to sell any directly to a consumer - all of them will only sell to large ISPs and Cable companies like COMCAST. This makes absolutely no sense for such an important consumer technlogy. Imagine if all the Wifi AP and Cable Modem companies decided that you would not be able to buy their products and they would only sell to giant monopolistic companies like COMCAST that require that you indefinitely rent these devices and also insists on crippling them as well to remove basic functionality that the manufacturers had already built in for the benefit of the end-user? But then I thought back to the commotion a few months ago where people were buying the Cisco DPC3939 (ie, XB3) Wireless Gateway with MOCA 2.0 and having it activated without having to pay the ridiculous unending COMCAST rental fees and how quickly COMCAST acted to ban activation of Cisco DPC3939's that were purchased outright by customers by suggesting without any proof given whatsoever that the customers must have purchased "stolen" goods. How much does COMCAST make from overcharging so many customers for so long for "HD" DVRs (separate charge for DVR, separate charge for HD ability in 2014??), settop boxes, cable modems, eMTA etc..? I calculate that almost since the entire time I've been signed up to Comcast for Television in 2004, I've paid them at least $200/year for the right to use a slow, buggy and primitive 1080i 4:3 aspect ratio HD DVR with 250GB hard drive. Over ten years, I've paid COMCAST more than $2,000 for a device that I still don't own and has never offered anything to me but which I was forced to rent and use because COMCAST fought and lobbied during the late 90s and early 2000's to ensure that other companies could not make and sell consumer purchasable devices that were able to access the cable content I had already paid COMCAST for. Today, a 1 Terabyte hard drive along with a compact system able to both play & stream 4K UHD TV, install apps, play games and designed much better than anything that has ever come out of COMCAST costs about $200 to $300 in total at retail. COMCAST and other cable companies ensured that the burden of CableCard and restrictive licensing and usage rights and the complexity of the associated industry crypto regulations would kill off innovative products like Microsoft Windows Media Center which despite all its great features was unable to access Digital cable channel content especially as COMCAST started vigerously encrypting every single channel on their lineup -- even the usually free-to-air channels like ABC, NBC, CBS, PBS etc.. Never mind the extra $5 to $10 they charged you a month to "rent" a single cable card that allowed you to only watch or record one Digital cable channel even though their own Cable company DVRs and set top boxes did not require the additional rental of cablecards to access digital cable via two or even five channels. This was all to cripple competing 3rd party devices while giving an unfair advantage to their own crippled products. I've come to believe that the situation with the inexplicable crippling of MOCA by COMCAST is no different. COMCAST is going out of its way to lock out 3rd party television-like services, devices and streaming applications from using the whole house MOCA 2.0 broadband Internet that is made possible by their XB3 Wireless Gateway and the coax cables that *I* paid to be put into my own home even if it means cruelly denying *all* their customers a very elegant and cost effective solution to the common problem of poor WiFi Internet coverage in homes. Finally, as the last persuasive piece of evidence supporting this belief that COMCAST is actively working to prevent its customers from using MOCA 2.0 because it does not want them to have the *choice* and *opportunity* to access reliable Internet TV-like multimedia not purchased from or controlled by COMCAST, I refer you to the absurd mandatory bundling of the COMCAST XB3 MOCA 2.0 Wireless Gateway with the COMCAST MOCA 2.0 X1 DVR and Cloud based Entertainment device. Clearly COMCAST wants you to pay for and rent their own substandard Television streaming/DVR device even if you don't want it and prefer to use something else with better design, reliability, quality and content. They want to tax you every month for using the Coaxial cables that you paid for in your own home. It seems to me now that COMCAST believes that the great advance of MOCA 2.0 is soley a benefit for their bottom line a sole benefit to themselves of extending their broadband high speed Internet access monopoly into the market for streaming/online video services even if it is at the expense of providing a quality whole-house Internet service and associated devices and accessories that meet the needs of their numerous customers.

Among the alternatives not mentioned... Using a TiVo DVR, rather than the X1; a Roamio Plus or Pro would solve both the concern over the quality of the DVR, as well as providing the MoCA bridge capability the poster so desperately wanted the X1 DVR to provide. (Although the TiVo's support only MoCA 1.1.) Just get a third-party MoCA adapter for the distant location. Why the hang-up on having a device provided by Comcast? This seems especially ironic given the opinions expressed regarding payments over time to Comcast. If a MoCA 2.0 bridge was the requirement, they don't exist outside providers. So couldn't the poster have simply requested a replacement XB3 from the local office and configured it down to only providing MoCA bridging -- and perhaps as a wireless access point? Comcast would bill him the monthly rate for the extra device, but such is the state of MoCA 2.0. Much of the OP sounds like frustration over devices providing capabilities the poster *thinks* they should have.

ASBN creation in iSupplier - PO details not appearing on Create ASBN page

Hi,
I have created PO in Purchasing.
In iSupplier Portal,the PO details are appearing on the Create Advance Shipment Notice page but the PO details are NOT appearing on the Create Advance Shipment Billing Notice page.
Oracle Applications : 12.1.3

HI,
Thanks for your reply.
I havent done any sourcing yet, because i was not able to proceed with creation of RFI because my items after approval was not appearing.
FYI.
This sceanrio is already escalated to OSS, i need to verify if this is an isolated case, product error or user error.
Please help!
many thanks!

XML Publisher Integration: OAF Page in invalid after PDF creation

Hello,
after days of googling and trying out various code changes in vain I hope to find help in this forum.
The requirement is to extend the shipment page PosAsnMainPage in iSupplier Portal, adding the creation and download of PDF shipping documents for the orders selected in the table. These documents can be created for multiple shipments at once, always resulting in exactly one PDF file.
To achieve this, I have added a button to the page that triggers the event "XxpoPrintShippingDocuments". In the controller class that extends the standard iSupplier Portal Controller, I have extended processFormRequest as follows:
public void processFormRequest(OAPageContext pageContext, OAWebBean webBean)
super.processFormRequest(pageContext, webBean);
if(strEvent.equals("XxpoPrintShippingDocuments") && ("Y").equals(pageContext.getProfile("XXPO_DROPSHIPDOCUMENTS_SECURITY")))
outputDropshipDocuments();
}//end processFormRequest
private void outputDropshipDocuments()
* on the view object, compose a list of PoHeaderId, PoLineId, LineLocationId from the rows that were selected
OAViewObject vo = (OAViewObject) am.findViewObject("PosShipmentsVO");
* Create PDF and a pop-up window for download
//file info
String fileName = pageContext.getMessage("XXPO", "XXPO_SD_FILENAME", null);
String fileType = "PDF";
boolean appendDate = true;
//template info
String appName = getApplicationName(vendorSiteId);
String templKey = getTemplateKey(vendorSiteId);
//user info
Integer userId = new Integer(pageContext.getUserId());
try
XxpoShippingDocumentsOut out = new XxpoShippingDocumentsOut(pageContext, webBean);
* Save the printed status
* This is supposed to be done here instead of during xml generation.
* If any uncaught exception occurs before, the printed status remains unchanged.
Class printClasses[] = {Map.class, Integer.class};
Serializable printParams[] = {selectedOrders, userId};
am.invokeMethod("savePrintStatus", printParams, printClasses);
out.setFileInfo(fileName, fileType, appendDate);
out.outputFile(xmlDoc, templKey, appName);
} catch (Exception e)
throw new OAException(e.getMessage(), OAException.WARNING);
Finally, in XxpoShippingDocumentsOut.outputFile there is the following code:
public void outputFile(XMLDocument xmlDoc, String templateKey, String appName)
try {
ServletOutputStream os = response.getOutputStream();
response.setHeader("Content-Disposition", contentDisposition);
response.setContentType(contentType);
ByteArrayOutputStream outputStream = new ByteArrayOutputStream();
xmlDoc.print(outputStream);
ByteArrayInputStream inputStream = new ByteArrayInputStream(outputStream.toByteArray());
ByteArrayOutputStream File = new ByteArrayOutputStream();
OADBTransactionImpl transaction = (OADBTransactionImpl) am.getOADBTransaction();
TemplateHelper.processTemplate(
transaction.getAppsContext(),
appName,
templateKey,
transaction.getUserLocale().getLanguage(),
transaction.getUserLocale().getCountry(),
inputStream,
outputType.byteValue(),
null,
File);
* write the output to the HttpServletResponse object and flush -
* this creates the pop-up window
byte[] b = File.toByteArray();
response.setStatus(HttpServletResponse.SC_OK);
response.setContentLength(b.length);
os.write(b, 0, b.length);
os.flush();
os.close();
} catch (Exception e) {
response.setContentType("text/html");
throw new OAException(e.getMessage(), OAException.ERROR);
Most of this works just fine - I select some orders on the standard iSP page, press the button and download the PDF file. But after that, the page is not "valid" any longer: the selections made are still visible but when a button is pressed (for instance the Create Shipment Notice or my own button), I get an error stating that items must be selected first.
If I deactivate the lines in outputFile that set the response or flush the output stream, I can further use the previously made selections and everything works fine - except I don't get the PDF I need, obviously.
Does anyone have an idea of what is missing here to reload the page or anything? Is there any workaround (i.e. opening the file downlad in a separate browser tab)?
I'd be grateful for any advice on this. If you wish any further information, please let me know.
Best regards,
Michelle
Edited by: 968905 on 01.11.2012 06:09
Edited by: 968905 on 12.11.2012 03:02

Hello,
after days of googling and trying out various code changes in vain I hope to find help in this forum.
The requirement is to extend the shipment page PosAsnMainPage in iSupplier Portal, adding the creation and download of PDF shipping documents for the orders selected in the table. These documents can be created for multiple shipments at once, always resulting in exactly one PDF file.
To achieve this, I have added a button to the page that triggers the event "XxpoPrintShippingDocuments". In the controller class that extends the standard iSupplier Portal Controller, I have extended processFormRequest as follows:
public void processFormRequest(OAPageContext pageContext, OAWebBean webBean)
super.processFormRequest(pageContext, webBean);
if(strEvent.equals("XxpoPrintShippingDocuments") && ("Y").equals(pageContext.getProfile("XXPO_DROPSHIPDOCUMENTS_SECURITY")))
outputDropshipDocuments();
}//end processFormRequest
private void outputDropshipDocuments()
* on the view object, compose a list of PoHeaderId, PoLineId, LineLocationId from the rows that were selected
OAViewObject vo = (OAViewObject) am.findViewObject("PosShipmentsVO");
* Create PDF and a pop-up window for download
//file info
String fileName = pageContext.getMessage("XXPO", "XXPO_SD_FILENAME", null);
String fileType = "PDF";
boolean appendDate = true;
//template info
String appName = getApplicationName(vendorSiteId);
String templKey = getTemplateKey(vendorSiteId);
//user info
Integer userId = new Integer(pageContext.getUserId());
try
XxpoShippingDocumentsOut out = new XxpoShippingDocumentsOut(pageContext, webBean);
* Save the printed status
* This is supposed to be done here instead of during xml generation.
* If any uncaught exception occurs before, the printed status remains unchanged.
Class printClasses[] = {Map.class, Integer.class};
Serializable printParams[] = {selectedOrders, userId};
am.invokeMethod("savePrintStatus", printParams, printClasses);
out.setFileInfo(fileName, fileType, appendDate);
out.outputFile(xmlDoc, templKey, appName);
} catch (Exception e)
throw new OAException(e.getMessage(), OAException.WARNING);
Finally, in XxpoShippingDocumentsOut.outputFile there is the following code:
public void outputFile(XMLDocument xmlDoc, String templateKey, String appName)
try {
ServletOutputStream os = response.getOutputStream();
response.setHeader("Content-Disposition", contentDisposition);
response.setContentType(contentType);
ByteArrayOutputStream outputStream = new ByteArrayOutputStream();
xmlDoc.print(outputStream);
ByteArrayInputStream inputStream = new ByteArrayInputStream(outputStream.toByteArray());
ByteArrayOutputStream File = new ByteArrayOutputStream();
OADBTransactionImpl transaction = (OADBTransactionImpl) am.getOADBTransaction();
TemplateHelper.processTemplate(
transaction.getAppsContext(),
appName,
templateKey,
transaction.getUserLocale().getLanguage(),
transaction.getUserLocale().getCountry(),
inputStream,
outputType.byteValue(),
null,
File);
* write the output to the HttpServletResponse object and flush -
* this creates the pop-up window
byte[] b = File.toByteArray();
response.setStatus(HttpServletResponse.SC_OK);
response.setContentLength(b.length);
os.write(b, 0, b.length);
os.flush();
os.close();
} catch (Exception e) {
response.setContentType("text/html");
throw new OAException(e.getMessage(), OAException.ERROR);
Most of this works just fine - I select some orders on the standard iSP page, press the button and download the PDF file. But after that, the page is not "valid" any longer: the selections made are still visible but when a button is pressed (for instance the Create Shipment Notice or my own button), I get an error stating that items must be selected first.
If I deactivate the lines in outputFile that set the response or flush the output stream, I can further use the previously made selections and everything works fine - except I don't get the PDF I need, obviously.
Does anyone have an idea of what is missing here to reload the page or anything? Is there any workaround (i.e. opening the file downlad in a separate browser tab)?
I'd be grateful for any advice on this. If you wish any further information, please let me know.
Best regards,
Michelle
Edited by: 968905 on 01.11.2012 06:09
Edited by: 968905 on 12.11.2012 03:02

Iphone 6 was mysteriously cancelled, reordered, and cancelled again all by the system

I am a new verizon wireless customer nearing the end of my at&t billing cycle. I haven't even received my phones yet but I have already had the worse experience ever.
I ordered two iphones on 9/13 when the delievery date was still set at 9/19 in stores and I also ordered a samsung s5 which was shipped to my brother within days. The 9/19 delivery date was crucial since my brother's account would start earlier and we are supposed to be sharing 10 gigs of data. The sales associate was able to credit us $30 to compensate for the preorder delivery date not aligning with our plan's start date.
However when 9/19 came along and no phones were delivered to my house, I checked online and my order was now set to be delivered by 10/7. I went to the verizon store immediately and the manager apologized and said he couldn't do anything and that it was just very backordered. Everything was still okay with me at this point since I understood the iphone being in high demand.
Then the crazy things happened. On 9/23, I received email saying that my preorders were cancelled. I NEVER cancelled them. An hour later, I was emailed receipts saying that I had gone into the verizon store and ordered two new iphones that day BUT I never did this either. Than, another hour passes and I receive emails saying the two phones I had 'supposedly' ordered that day were also cancelled. Lastly, I get an email saying one of my phones has shipped and is supposed to come on 9/19 but at this point, it was already 9/23.
After a stream of all these emails, I headed into the store the next day to figure out what the heck had happened. According the manager, the sales people whose names were on the receipts of our 'supposed' orders did not even work at that store. He also suspected hackers had somehow done this. After numerous phone calls to customer service and hours sitting at the store, we were able to reorder the iphones..but with a later delivery date of course.
* I would like to mention that the manager and sales person were extremely kind and helpful but they could only do so much.
Now, my mom and I are looking at either days with no cell phones (while we wait for our iphone 6's to arrive) or paying an additional month for at&t WHILE paying for verizon already since my brother's contract has already started.
I really hope verizon will actually look into my situation because this was definitely an internal issue. While I know other people's phones have been mysteriously cancelled, I do not know of anyone who's account has gone through so much strange activity as mine.

I also pre-ordrered on 9/12 a 128GB Gold 6 Plus. When ordering, it gave me the option to Bill to Account, which I did for about 1/2 the price of the phone. Little did I know that when Verizon tried to ship the phone, it attempted to charge my bank act the ENTIRE AMOUNT of the phone!! Well, there wasn't enough money in my checking acct for that, only what I had originally planned on paying outright, $250. So because of that, the order didn't go through and Verizon CANCELLED MY PRE-ORDER! I never got an email or anything. I was SUPPOSED to get my phone by 10/3 or something like that.
On 10/1, I called Verizon and asked them where my phone was in the queue. The Rep tells me that my order was cancelled and why (I didn't know any of the above information when I first called). and didn't I get an email alerting me to such? NO!!! Boy was I mad!! Still am very upset with how this whole pre-order thing was handled. My Sister-in-law walked INTO a Verizon Store (or maybe Best Buy) ON LAUNCH DAY and got a new iPhone 6! Here I am almost 2 months later, a Verizon Customer since 2008 and I am STILL WAITING!! I was so very angry but didn't lose my cool. The Rep offered me a $25 inconvenience credit on my bill, which I gladly accepted!
I ended up ordering again on 10/1....I JUST got shipment notice today that my IPhone 6 Plus 128GB in Gold is shipping out so hopefully it'll be in my hands on Monday!!!! I'd call Verizon and ask them why your order was cancelled, they'll be able to help you faster than waiting for a Rep to answer you here and ask about getting an inconvenience credit

Cross-Company Stock Transfer with Delivery and Billing

Hello Fellow Experts and Friends,
I have a situation at a client in California. The client does Make-to-Order sales. The only materials kept in inventory are raw materials and NREs. This client has plants in several countries around the world but only two are on SAP. The current version is 4.6C.
The scenario goes like this. The plant in China (CC: 2020, Plnt: 0020) wants to order raw materials from the US plant (CC: 1010, Plnt: 0010). If the US plant does not have enough stock in inventory, an order needs to be placed with a local vendor. When all materials a re available to ship,we need to deliver to and invoice the China plant. Additionally, shipment notification needs to be sent to the plant in China.
IWould someone please be so kind as to helpme with a "Best Practice" process flow for Cross-Company STO with Delivery and Billing? I also need guidlines for customizing the process in the IMG. This process must include issuing a PO to a local vendor for ordering additional inventory. For the shipment notification, I was thinking of an EDI Advance Shipment Notice if the receiving plant uses EDI. I need a different option, If the receiving palnt does not use EDI.
I am open to your suggestions.
Thanks,
AJ
Edited by: Arthur Hawley on Sep 8, 2009 10:56 PM
Edited by: Arthur Hawley on Sep 11, 2009 4:46 PM

Arthur,
Once this is correctly set up it works very, very well. And the cross-company supply scenario is actually fairly simple, streamlined and automated. However, this is NOT such a simple process to set up.
True cross-company supply, all the way through, requires a LOT of configuration which ties in SD, MM, FI, and EDI. It uses "wrap-around" IDocs to do some of the cross-posting in other company codes. There is also the issue of Intercompany markups, as well as Intercompany eliminations.
There are LOTS of folks who do the painful process of the FULL Order to Cash in one company code, and the full Purchase to Pay in the other. But this is NOT the right solution and requires almost twice as much transaction processing.
Just for the Intercompany setup, start to finish, I've been working on a "cookbook" to set up all of the modules for almost 10 years now. I've done it several times, at several companies and it works very well once it is all in place. However, that cookbook document is about 100 pages long (config settings, IMG settings, master data requirements, EDI settings, etc.).
Also, in your scenario you are talking about multi-sourcing parts from other locations. All of the related MRP settings are a separate setup issue.
What you are asking is WAYYYYyyy beyond the scope of forum posting. So if your company or client could use some help, please feel free to contact me.
Bill Wood - President
R3Now Consulting
http://www.r3now.com SAP thought leadership!
Platinum SAP Solutions
(704) 905 - 5175
http://www.linkedin.com/in/billwood

A FM for the Sales Document Flow ...?

Hi Friends;
I know that the Sales and Distribution Flow is kept in table VBFA .? But is there a ready function module that gives me the shipment note number and invoice number taking reversals into consideration and giving the actual and final flow of sales order item ?
for example : input     SALES Document : SD001 item 10
                    output   shipment Notice    : 8000001 item 10
                    output   invoice number      : 9000001 item 10
Kind regards.
Erkan VAROL.

Hi,
look for example to BAPI_SALESORDER_GETLIST
CALL FUNCTION 'RV_ORDER_FLOW_INFORMATION'
Please check table VBFA. It contains all the information about document flow in SD.
Check the example program below, it is not a function call, it is a dialog call.
(Or)
report zrich_0001.
data: xvbco6 type vbco6.
data: xvbak type vbak.
parameters: p_vbeln type vbak-vbeln.
clear xvbco6. clear xvbak.
select single * from vbak into xvbak
where vbeln = p_vbeln.
move-corresponding xvbak to xvbco6.
call dialog 'RV_DOCUMENT_FLOW'
exporting
vbco6 from xvbco6
ivkorg from xvbak-vkorg
ivtweg from xvbak-vtweg.
Regards

Help in File Adapter

We have an SAP system exchanging data with an ftp server.
RFC from the SAP system gives Advanced Shipment Notice(ASN) as the output.
It gives header items in one table and line itmes in another table. The key between the header and line items is the shipment ID.
Each header item can have N line items.
Our goal is to create a separate file for each of the header items.
The above file is an xml file has one header item and the corresponding line items.
Can any one help me with this?

Hi Naveen,
Check this link
/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2004/12/15/how-to-send-a-flat-file-with-fixed-lengths-to-xi-30-using-a-central-file-adapter
and
Re: Sender file adapter error
/people/arpit.seth/blog/2005/06/02/file-receiver-with-content-conversion
/people/venkat.donela/blog/2005/03/03/introduction-to-simple-file-xi-filescenario-and-complete-walk-through-for-starterspart2
/people/anish.abraham2/blog/2005/06/08/content-conversion-patternrandom-content-in-input-file
/people/sravya.talanki2/blog/2005/08/16/configuring-generic-sender-file-cc-adapter
/people/venkat.donela/blog/2005/03/02/introduction-to-simplefile-xi-filescenario-and-complete-walk-through-for-starterspart1
Hope they help to fix your issue
Regards

Archlinux runs slow

After installing arch linux I noticed laggy responce with the console. For instance, when I type ls in my home directory it'll sometimes take 2-5 seconds before it'll list the contents. Is this because it's using reiserfs or devfs? I assumed they were better so I used them..
I'm used to mandrake where everything is done for me so I assume I just don't have something setup right.

Normally I just choose base as I want to learn how to configure everything myself. At first I was thinking it was a power management thing since it seems to happen after I have left the system for a little bit, but when I recompiled the kernel I disabled power management. This didn't fix anything. I have not checked whether it's specific to root or user, i'm normally in root since I've been trying to get everything working. If this helps.. when I type top it says my cpu is 0% for everything and 100% idle.

8i on Linux Shipment notice

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for