About Purchasing Requisition Extraction

Hi,buddies:
Is there any business content or other methods to extract the Purchasing Requisition from SAP R/3? or is there any how-to guide to solve this problem except General Datasource?
Your answer will be highly appreciated.

Hello, You will locate the Datasource on ECC-> RSA5 -> NODESNOTCONNECTED -> IS-DFS-BW
Now you can activate, then replicate Datasources on BW, and then test (or you can just test the Datasource on ECC -> RSA3 to first see what kind of data you will receive.
After that, you will have to activate Standards objects to receive this data on BW.

Similar Messages

Error in new purchase requisitions, for already deliverd materials

Dear all,
I have a problem with newly created purchase requisitions, although material was partially delivered and no delivery is expected anymore.
For example I have ordered 1767kg of oil and a total sum of 1766.2kg was deliverd. This means only a minor amount of material was not deliverd and only 80gramm are missing. The purchase value key allows a 5% over and under delivery.
Usually I would expect, that because of the purchasing value key of 5 % over and under deliverance allowence this situation should not occur anymore. Additionally at the time of goods receipt the key of final delivery was set and the purchase order is updated correctly.
But when I run the MRP again I will have another purchase requisition. The dependend requiement of the material above still existis as production is not finished yet or this is still a planned order.
What keys do I need to set in total for allowing a "partial delivery"?
- Purchaseing value key in the material master
- Delivery completed at the time of goods receipt
Maybe this question is to basic as I cannot find any questions / answers related to this issue here in the forum.
In some points, I found that I need to set up the vendor accordingly to set up partial deliveries. But I cannot find the right setting to allow the vendor to do so. I use MK02 for the change of the vendor settings.
Thank you very much for your support!
With best greetings,
Bjoern

Hello Jürgen,
yes after thinking about this issue again, I think this might not be an appropriate solution. Now I am thinking about other possibilities.
1) Automatically change the value in the production order at the time of saving MIGO - will not create any more missing material messages and no new purchase requisitions .
2) Errror message, that for this positions no more postings are possible as the purchase order still remains "open"
3) I need to find the customizing of the indicator "delivery completed". At the moment I just dont see, the influence of this indicator.
Sorry for my "stupid" questions, but I am quiete new to these MM topics. Up to now I was always doing only PP and QM but our collegue for MM has left the team and there are some open issues which now belong to me. Lucky me.
I have created a new posting at:
With best greetings,
Bjoern

Purchase Order and Purchase Requisition

Hi To All,
my customer while using tcode me2m hase extracted purchase order opened since 2007. now he want to close all this order and settle them to zero. this operation should be done also for the purchase requisition.
there is a standard way to do this? if not any idea?
thanks
C.

Hello
Just by doing
In the PO line item level details, activate DELIVERY COMPLETED check box.
system will not close po from GR
U will have to check what is the gr qty did till date
and update the po with the same qty manually
eq
if po qty is 50 and total gr done till date is 40
change the PO qty to 40 and save
this is the way u can shot close the po
Which effects has the "delivery completed" indicator?
The purchase order item is considered closed, even though the total quantity may not have been delivered.
Although a further delivery is not expected, it is still possible.
At the time of the next goods receipt, the system suggests the item as unselected.
The purchase order item can be deleted, even if the total quantity was not delivered.
Although the "delivery completed" indicator is not set, a purchase order item is still considered closed if the full quantity has been delivered. In this case, the "delivery completed indicator" is not required.
The system allows to make further goods receipts. Why?
Answer
See note 16239 and 856279
hope this helps
Edited by: Umakant Bhangale on Oct 11, 2010 5:20 PM

Report with purchase requisitions and purchase orders: how?

Hi,
I need to get a list of items bought with their purchase requisitions and purchase orders (when they exist). This can be done looking at each purchase order (ME23N), ou purchase requisition (ME53N), and writing it down. But in some cases, I have to do it on about 450 operations. I'd like to get this list without having to search for each requisition ou order. I can get a complete list of orders and requisitions, but without any relationship between them (they are mixed as if they were the same thing, but there´s a field telling it that row is an order or a requisition). Using some macros in excel, I can find this relationship in 40% of the cases (for example, if item 421351 was purchased only once, an order for item 421351 is related to a requisition for item 421351). Is there any way to get this list automatically? Or is there any field that tell me this relationship?
Thanks,
Francisco Morbiolo
Votorantim Cimentos
Votorantim, SP - Brazil

Sorry, I forgot to tell this: I don´t have access to SQ01/SQ02/SQ03.
I get the orders and requisition reports using ZGLPS020.
Thanks,
Francisco Morbiolo
Votorantim Cimentos
Votorantim, SP - Brazil

PO creation from One Purchase Requisition

Dear all;
In standard SAP We can create multiple PO from A single PReq ,though the full quantity of PReq is taken first time of PO creation .Is there any restriction that After full use PReq quantity no one can use the same PReq for further PO creation.
Thanking You;
Regards;
Joydeep Mukherjee

Dear Joydeep,
In contrast to a purchase requisition, it is possible to create more than one PO in reference to a RFQ.
A RFQ only gives information about the price for which can be ordered from a vendor. The system does therefore not reject you from ordering again from the same vendor with the best conditions.
Once you create a PO with reference to an RFQ, if the quantity in PR to which the RFQ is refering is exhausted,
the user is prevented from creating further PO only with reference to the PR. But the user can create Purchase orders refering to a RFQ as long as the validity period of the RFQ is still valid.
Regards,
ian, Wong Loke Foong

Creation of Purchase Order Instead of Purchase Requisition

Dear Gurus,
In Extended Classic Scenario we are using SRM 5.0 and ECC 6.0. we need to create only Purchase Order rather then Purchase Requisition. this is given as the development enhancement. can anyone of you tell me the procedure to go about this requirement.
In the following step : " Go to SRM --> SRM Server --> Cross Application Settings --> Define Objects in Backend System --> go to external procurement and select the function from the drop down box", it says "purchase order if item data is complete, otherwise Purchase Requsition.
So i am not sure that this will fulfill my requirement. need some help from you guys.
Thanks in Advance,
Mohit.

Hi Mohit,
I have gone through your query. It says you are working in Extended classic scenario.
If you want to create a P.O directly after creating a shopping cart in SRM, maintain the following settings
SPRO > IMG > SRM > SRM Server > SOURCING > Define sourcing for product categories
In that maintain category I.D, Source system and Sourcing never carried out in sourcing tab.
After maintaining these settings, once you create a shopping cart and assign a vendor in the shopping cart it will directly create a P.O instead of going to sourcing **** pit.
In case if you don't assign any vendor in Shopping cart it will still create a P.O but kept in held status. The P.O gets released once you assign a vendor.
In case you require further calrification feel free to ask.
Also reward points for suitable answers.
Rgds,
Teja

FM or BAPI for date and time for the creation of a Purchase Requisition

Hi people:
Does anybody knows about a FM, BAPI or table in which i have de detail for the date and hour of the creation of a Purchase requisition?
Points for helpfull answers.
Thanks in advanced

Hi,
If you want to get the time along with the creation date then use the tables CDHDR and CDPOS, but be careful while passing the data need to pass the entire primary fields data else it will fail in the performance test.
Reward points if useful.
Regards,
Suman

Questions on Rules-Based ATP and Purchase Requisitions for STOs

Hello experts,
We are working on rules-based ATP configuration and have several questions about the functionality. Iu2019m hoping that some of you are using this functionality and can help give us direction.
In our environment we have multiple distribution centers and multiple manufacturing plants. We want to confirm sales orders against stock and production orders in any of those plants, depending on the locations that have stock or planned production. For example, we will place a sales order against plant A. If there is not enough stock in plant A then rules-based ATP will use location determination to check in plant B, then C. The scope of check on the ATP check will include stock and released production orders. We will configure plant A as the u201Cconsolidation locationu201D so if stock is found in plants B or C then stock transport orders will automatically be created to move the stock to plant A before shipping to the customer.
We have configured rules-based ATP and this functionality is working well in our Development system. The ATP check is executed and uses the rules-based ATP to find eligible stock in other plants. The system is also creating purchase requisitions to move the stock to the consolidation plant.
Our first concern is that there doesnu2019t appear to be any firm linkage between the sales order and the resulting purchase requisition. For example, if we create sales order 123 for plant A and the rules-based ATP finds stock in plant B it automatically creates a purchase requisition 987 to move the stock from plant B to plant A. However, there doesnu2019t appear to be a linkage between sales order 123 and purchase requisition 987. For instance, if we delete sales order 123 the purchase requisition doesnu2019t get deleted.
Our second concern is that the quantity on the purchase requisition can still be confirmed against later sales orders. For example, say the above scenario resulted in a purchase requisition 987 that consumed all the stock available in plant B. We then create a second sales order 456 for the same product. Plant A is out of stock so the rules-based ATP looks in plant B. We would expect that plant B would also not have any stock because itu2019s all been consumed by the purchase requisition. Instead, the system creates a second purchase requisition to move quantity from plant B to plant A. Itu2019s as if the system doesnu2019t realize that the purchase requisition 987 is already planning to move stock out of plant B.
Does anyone have any thoughts or suggestions on these two scenarios? Is there a way to configure the system so there is a hard linkage between the sales order and the purchase requisition so that if the sales order is deleted then the purchase requisition is also deleted? Should ATP realize that purchase orders are consuming inventory and not allow later sales orders to confirm against that same inventory? Any advice or experience would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
David Eady
Application Delivery Team Lead
Propex, Inc.

Hi,
The scheduling is done in SCM, and from there, whenever the RBA is triggered, the calculation is done always with the old route in SCM. Until you get back to R/3 this is when your route is determined. But the ATP check is always with the original route. So the idea would be that you change the values of the route while still in APO, this is possible via the user exit. Should be done in scheduling in APO.
Hope this information is helpful.
Regards,
Tibor

Integration of CRM Service with ERP MM (Reservation, Purchase Requisition, Purchase Order)

My (i think simple) question is about integration of CRM service to ERP MM, e.g. for spare parts delivery or spare parts purchasing or scrapping parts in a CRM service order - i thought something very basic and standard
I always thought that inside a ERP SD order you have item categories and those item categories do have a schedule line category and a requirement class and from those are determined the MM movement typ and the automatism if the system creates in MM a reservation a purchase requisition or a purchase order. That was always my understanding
Now i was surprised to learn the customizing in SAP CRM (CRM/Transactions/Settings for Service Transactions/Integration/ Logistics Integration/Define Transfer parameters) - there i can say:
CRM Transaction Type+ CRM Item Category = ERP Movement Type + ERP Special Stock Indicator
or next to it in the SAP CRM Customizing
(CRM/Transactions/Settings for Service Transactions/Integration/ Logistics Integration/DefineLogistics Scenario for the Procurement of Material and Sales)
i can say:
CRM Transaction Type+ CRM Item Category = ERP Reservation or ERP purchase requisition or ERP purchase Order
Now i know that in SAP CRM if you have a transaction and an item category for a logistics operation, the system creates an EPR sales order of the same number and type with the same item categories.
My question is: WHERE is determined which movement type the system uses and if there is created a reservation or purchase requisition or purchase Order. Is it determined in the ERP by using the ERP sales order item category and the SD item category customizing or is it determined by the customizing in the SAP CRM that i described above?
Thank you

Hi Anup,
I am facing purchase requisition creation problem for service products from crm.
I have seen your query which was posted on same issue, so i thought i could get some help.
The problem here is when i am saving the service order i am getting the below message.
Enter a (default) purchasing group for material group SUB_MC (Notification E CRM_SRV_LOG_EXT_OLTP 002).
I have actually downloaded mat_dien materials from ecc to crm and for material purchase group is already assigned for one plant, but still not able to recognise.
Please help me out.
Thanks in advance.

Workflow for MM purchase Requisition steps required

Dear all,
        I am trying to configure purchase requisition Workflow.
        I am working with Work flow, WS 00000038
        I have assigned agents to TS 20000162
        Now how to proceed further, do i need to maintain some more settings
        or i should try to test system.
        Regards,
        Gaurav sood

Under the assumption that things have not changed much since 4.70, here's quick introduction:
The workflow is started only when a relevant release strategy is found, so customizing of release strategies is a very important (first) step here.
In the Implementation Guide you find the customizing in the following path:
Materials Management
-- Purchasing
-- -- Purchase Requisition
-- -- -- Release Procedure
-- -- -- -- Procedure with Classification
Only the procedures with classification are relevant if you want to use workflow to notify about requisitions waiting for release.
First you must set up a classification class if that has not already been done. Derive your characteristics from the structure CEBAN. The online help is not too bad, I had never set up classifications before and managed to get it working.
If you need data that are not available in CEBAN, or you want to modify them for the purpose of determining the release strategy there is an enhancement you can implement, and there are customer fields you can use. The enhancement definition's name is M06B0002.
As an example of what you can do, I have used it to set the company code in one of the customer fields, and to change the account assignment type. However, whether you need this enhancement or not depends strongly on what data you use to determine your release procedures (a step in customizing you will get to later).
When that is done you define release groups and release codes. Release codes are defined within each release group. Whether you should use one group or several groups is often a matter of choice.
I myself prefer using several groups even if I don't have to, so long as it doesn't lead to having to define duplicate release strategies (which you will soon get to). So, if there is some characteristic that clearly separates your release strategies, e.g. the highest amount that does NOT require release etc, you can define one group for each value (group) of this characteristic.
For instance, if some company codes require release for everything worth more than 100EUR while the default is to require release from 10.000EUR you could create to release groups. None of your release strategies will be duplicates since the value from which release is required will be different and you thus need to have that as a characteristic.
You then check that the set-up of release indicators is OK, and then you are ready to start defining the strategies. Release stragies are defined within each release group, and use one or more release codes (two or more release indicators).
It is fairly self-explanatory once you get into the screens. The thing to be observant about is to not define overlapping strategies, as this will prevent the solution from working.
When you are done, and have tested the solution in DEV it is time to transport it to the QA system. That's when I got a rather unpleasant surprise. The classification data are not transported, so both the characteristics and class, as well as the classification data in each release strategy had to be redefined. And in roughly two hours I have to do it again in production.
It is possible to transport classification information, it is described in SAP OSS Notes (different solutions for different versions).

Purchase Requisition for non valuated material

Hi,
We have defined a material as non valuated in ECC, we are doing planning vfor the material in APO and generating Purchase Requisition on vendor for the material. Now the issue is that we are not able to CIF the Purchase requisition to ECC and system is giving account assignment error.
For the same plant vendor locatio n combination Purchase requisition is getting CIFed for valuated material.
Canm anyone please help regarvding how to CIF purchase requistion for non valuated material from APO to ECC.
Thanks & Regards,
Sanjog Mi shrikotkar

Hi Sanjog
Agreed : the material is non valuated so we have not extended accounting view for the material, also we cannot allow financial posting for non valuated material.
But an accounting view is required for a material, no matter whether it is a valuated or a non valuated material
I am sorry about not being able to transmit any positive reply to you, i am not aware of other way of getting it
Best Regards
Vinod

VA01 BDC Session - Purchase requisition wiew not shown

Hello Forum,
I've a problem with a BDC session in ECC 6.0 about VA01. When I try to change the purchasing requisition data from the shcedule tab using the button identified from the BDC with the code "EIBB" (the last one) the subsequent screen is not shown from the system. If I try to create manually a new sales order I'm able to view the screen.
I tried to remake the recording in 4.6C and the screen is shown correctly.
I'm in a mock conversion and in UAT but I wasn't able to find the problem.
Can you suggest something << Moderator message - Everyone's problem is important >>?
Many Thanks.
Regards.
Edited by: Rob Burbank on Oct 19, 2010 3:20 PM

Thanks Anyway, but with an additional search I've found the solution Here.
Batch input VA01 problem

Table Name of Purchase Requisition Grid Line Item (SAP-AFS)

Dear All,
As im in the midst of preparing a report on the purchase requisitions with grid value and its respective quantity for those which are not converted as POs.
im not able to find the table which holds the AFS grid details related to the PR. im using EBAN to fetch the PR header and line item details and i tried joining with the EKET table, but resulting with the list of PR details those which are converted as POs, since EKET holds the PO sheduled line item details.
Reference Transaction - me53n - Item details table control.
Kindly help me to find the table which hold the above said data.
thanks in advance.Rating assured.
Message was edited by: Raja K.P

Hi Raja
   The tables you have mentioned are enough for extracting the details you need. Hope the below code helps you.
tables: eban, eket.
parameters: p_werks like eban-werks.
select-options: s_bsart for eban-bsart,
                s_erdat for eban-erdat obligatory,
                s_matnr for eban-matnr.
data: begin of itab occurs 0,
         banfn like eban-banfn,
         bnfpo like eban-bnfpo,
         bsart like eban-bsart,
         matnr like eban-matnr,
         menge like eban-menge,
         ebeln like eban-ebeln,
         ebelp like eban-ebelp,
         menge1 like eket-menge1,
       end of itab.
start-of-selection.
select a~banfn a~bnfpo a~bsart a~matnr
         a~menge a~ebeln a~ebelp b~menge
         into table itab
         from eban as a
         inner join eket as b
         on b~ebeln = a~ebeln
         and b~ebelp = a~ebelp
         where a~werks = p_werks
         and   a~bsart in s_bsart
         and   a~erdat in s_erdat
         and   a~matnr in s_matnr
         and   ( a~ebeln eq space or
                 a~menge ne b~menge ).
Now internal table itab will have all the open PR Numbers, for partially open PR's you will have itab-ebeln populated. For these entries subtract itab-menge1 from itab-menge to get the open qty.
Kind Regards
Eswar

Purchase Requisition Start Date

Hi,
I have a Purchase requisition in R/3 and APO for a product and location. I see in Md04 that the planned date, delivery date and release date are all 28.07.2008 but when it gets to APO, in pproduct view, I see the PR start date as 29.07.2008 and the end date as 08/03/2008.
Can somebody give me an idea why this is happening?
If the order is stuck in CIF que and gets pushed the next day, does the order date change???

Hi Harish,
Here are the settings:
R/3 - Local time - EST
Product View - ( Settings>time zone) UTC
We are using time stream id as a transportation calendar in Transportation lane means of transport - EST
does this effect the dates? Do you mean that I have to change the product view setting to EST? Is that enough?
Is the note you are talking about is 443500?
This material is a external procurement (F). So, i guess there won't be any PPMs.

Purchase Requisition Workflow - Organizational Plan required?

Hi,
We are implementing purchase requisition workflow.
Based on what I have read, it says that the workflow table (table V_T16FW) and SAP HR-PA-OM (organizational plan) must be set up to support the solution.
Question: If we are routing the workflow to a UserID, i.e. Object Type = US (and not an HR data object like Position or Job), do we require an Organizational Plan to be also set up?
Cheers,

Thanks so much for your response.
What about assigning tasks to users, etc. that is usually done in org plan, correct? If object type US is only used, I assume this is not required either?
Also, what is the benefit of using Object type = 'S', i.e. position? At my company, most of the time, when people leave, the position is deleted and a new one is created (there are a couple reasons for this), which means, even if we did use positions, the workflow table would still need to be maintained everytime a person leaves/joins the company (I understand if only the user to position mapping changes, then it makes sense to use positions, and therefore the workflow table stays constant, and only the user to position mapping changes). Are there any other benefits of using S instead of US?
Also, is it possible to NOT use a workflow table, and ONLY define an organizational plan? I was thinking to activate user exit M06B0001, and perhaps ONLY maintain an org plan, and use this to determine approver, rather than maintaining both MM workflow table and SAP Organizational Plan (HR-PA-OM). Bottom line, we want to maintain as little data as possible.
Your thoughts?
Cheers

About Purchasing Requisition Extraction

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for