ABST2
Hi All
we got the below error message in ABST2.
Message no: MQ555
Difference occured in the balance carried forward when comparing asset summary records and GL accounts.
please suggest us
thanks in advance
regards
prasad
Hi,
The accounts in the list must now be examined.The following procedure is recommended by SAP: (you can change the sequence).
a) Compare the last two fiscal years for the affected account with the balances display (FS10) in G/L accounting.If the closing balance and the opening balance are different, the balance carry forward program (SAPF011) must be started again for the current year.
b) Create two asset history sheets for the accounts affected.For performance reasons, you are recommended to restrict by account assignment or by asset classes.Enter 0020 as the sort version, the year-end of the previous year and the year-end of the current year as the report date and activate 'Posted depreciation'.If the opening and closing values of the asset history sheet are different, the fiscal year change should be repeated.If the opening and closing value differ after the fiscal year change, you should examine whether a fixed asset with capitalization date exists for which acquisition dates are missing.
Note that down payments and acquisition values are shown together in the asset history sheet while there are normally different reconciliation accounts for it.
An incremental takeover may be present and the accounts are not reconciled correctly.
c) The asset history sheet for the previous year does not agree if you cross-check the values.In this case, RAABST01 should be started for the account affected.If the balance carried forward is affected, the year-end closing must now be cancelled, a depreciation recalculation must be carried out, a depreciation posting may need to be carried out and the year-end must be closed again.
d) The opening balance values of the current year do not match the value of the balance display. There may be a variety of reasons for this.
The error occurs only on the business area level.In Financial Accounting in the previous year, you must post a transfer between the business areas directly to the account using ABF1/FB01.For the differences refer to RFEWSBAL.There is only a problem if there are values on the account for business areas for which there are no longer any assets.You can use these business areas as an offsetting account assignment for the differences. You can make the postings in same way as for Note 69225. As an alternative, you can deactivate the business area balance sheets. You can choose this solution if you activated the balance sheets by mistake.Upto now you did not reconcile FI-AA and FI-GL at business area level either.
Incorrect legacy data transfer:if there already exist differences in the year of the legacy data transfer, the differences must also be written off on the G/L account in the previous year. Refer also to Note 69225. This error occurs especially when a local currency changeover is performed directly in the year of a mid-year legacy data transfer and the balance values of Asset Accounting were not posted at the beginning of the year, that is, on December 31 but on the key date of legacy data transfer to the general ledger.You encounter this error when the system displays pairs of entries in the list for the balance carried forward (period is blank) and for the key date (period 999).
The problem also occurs if you manage reserves for special depreciation and have not reconciled the reserve for special depreciation balance sheet account during transfer or migration.
RAABST01 finds missing line items - these must be regenerated using RACORR05.
The account was posted manually.You can see this using the line item display of the account.These manual postings must be reversed.If necessary, a separate account that is not posted to by FI-AA must be created.(Also refer to Note 69225 - however, the adjustment posting has to be entered in the previous year.)
Account is an accumulated depreciation account:depreciation was reset by program during the fiscal year or fixed assets were deleted but depreciation had already been posted.Correct the values in the general ledger in the previous year (see Note 69225).
Account is not a reconciliation account of Asset Accounting:contact an SAP consultant. A serious Customizing error exists.However, this only applies to depreciation areas posting online.Customizing can be checked with the report RACKONT1 or via the IMG:'Preparations for productive operation --> Check consistency --> Assets: Report for G/L accounts'.
Start RAHAFA01 for the account with indicator 'Display special dep.If accumulated depreciations exist for different depreciation types (for example, normal or special depreciation, transfers of reserves), check whether accounts for these depreciation types are entered in the corresponding account assignment. If not, maintain the accounts.
Regards,
Eli
Similar Messages
-
ABST2 - Differences between Assets and G/L accts
Hi Experts
We are working on ECC 6.0 and INR is our local currency.
At the end of FY 2007 by mistake direct postings were made to Dep Fund Account which is a Recon a/c and FY 2007 was closed
And because of which FI-GL and FI-AA doesnt match by INR 37353.71 (amt posted in above doc) as shown in ABST2
I've referred SAP notes 104567 & 69225 and found the note 69225 relevant to follow as the difference has not resulted in the current or open years.
So we have passed direct entry which is exactly the reversal of entry posted above using ABF1 (INR -37353.71)
After posting the 2nd document, in ABST2 another line has appeared of INR -37353.71. Although the sum for my recon GL is now zero.
The output of ABST2 is as below now -
Sc Acct no. BusA Year SG 1st local difference LCurr Doc.no. Period
AS 31100 2009 37,353.71- INR W004
AS 31100 2009 37,353.71 INR W004 999
When I come out of ABST2 , addition to 1st, error no 2 is also coming which I thought would disappear.
1.Differences between assets and G/L accts in the balance carried forward
Message no. MQ555
2.Differences between assets and G/L accounts at the key date
Message no. MQ557
Is still something else needs to be done?
Or can I move ahead as the summation of the difference is now zero?
Please suggest.
KapilWe referred to SAP and they suggeted that the tagging of W004 in both the lines means that now there is no error even system prompts it as error.
So we continued with the transactions and after closing the FY 2009, today when we run ABST2, we dont get any error messages as there is no difference left between Assets & GL. -
ABST2 Error while doing Fixed Assets Closing
Hi,
I've run into an error of 0.01 in account 161370. I need to get past this or write off the difference in order to close the year..
Note: For 2008 Fixed assets closing i have executed ABST2 transaction now in this July-2009.When i execute ABST2,i am getting the below report.
CoCd Acct no. Year S 1st local difference
3000 161370 2009 0.01-
Differences between assets and G/L accts in the balance carried forward
Message no. MQ555
Diagnosis
Differences occurred in the balance carried forward when comparing asset summary records and G/L accounts.
Procedure
Using program RFEWSBAL, select the accounts for which differences occurred. To do this, proceed as follows:
1. Changeover package: Active package
Phase: ANALYZE
Origin of change: AS
Proceed
1. Analyze the accounts containing errors using note 104567.
If the document number field contains the entry "W004", this means that although a difference exists in the balance carried forward, this difference was charged off at the key date. Following local currency changeover, the system adjusts the currency differences at the key date only, but not in the balance carried forward.
If the entry "W004" exists for all affected accounts, the status is set to warning instead of error. If the correction at key date described above proves sufficient, you can continue changing over the local currency without additional adjustments in the previous year.
However, SAP does recommend that you make corrections in the previous year in line with note 104567 since this ensures that the balance carried forward is also reconciled.
Kindly Help me in this regard
SuvarnaHi,
I've run into an error of 0.01 in account 161370. I need to get past this or write off the difference in order to close the year..
Note: For 2008 Fixed assets closing i have executed ABST2 transaction now in this July-2009.When i execute ABST2,i am getting the below report.
CoCd Acct no. Year S 1st local difference
3000 161370 2009 0.01-
Differences between assets and G/L accts in the balance carried forward
Message no. MQ555
Diagnosis
Differences occurred in the balance carried forward when comparing asset summary records and G/L accounts.
Procedure
Using program RFEWSBAL, select the accounts for which differences occurred. To do this, proceed as follows:
1. Changeover package: Active package
Phase: ANALYZE
Origin of change: AS
Proceed
1. Analyze the accounts containing errors using note 104567.
If the document number field contains the entry "W004", this means that although a difference exists in the balance carried forward, this difference was charged off at the key date. Following local currency changeover, the system adjusts the currency differences at the key date only, but not in the balance carried forward.
If the entry "W004" exists for all affected accounts, the status is set to warning instead of error. If the correction at key date described above proves sufficient, you can continue changing over the local currency without additional adjustments in the previous year.
However, SAP does recommend that you make corrections in the previous year in line with note 104567 since this ensures that the balance carried forward is also reconciled.
Kindly Help me in this regard
Suvarna -
FI-AA reconci;lation- for year end closing(ABST2)
Dear Team,
This is with regard to Year end closure in Asset Accounting.
we are using T.code ASBT2, which is giving the differences in FA and GL recon,
can you suggest me the way to solve this Issue.
I have tried the GL with FS10n and Assets report to find the difference from period.
Issue is that as in the GL master the GL account is not flaged for Line item display, i am not able to view all the posting.
I hope lot of people have gone through ..this Issue, please guide if there is any other way or some thing missing. please let me know.
regards
sgshi,
i am not able to view all the posting.
-> use se16 for table bseg or reports like RFBPET00 to reconcile
search in forum for abst2
A.
Message was edited by:
Andreas Mann -
ABST2 error messages MQ 555 and MQ 557
Hi,
I receive the error messages MQ 555 and MQ 557 in ABST2 transaction.
We´ve done the ECC 6.0 upgrade (no new G/L activation), subsequent data conversion (migration - change transfer date) and
EA-FIN activation.
Is there any support note or package to fix the G/L - FA subledger reconciliation or it will be automatically solved in a new year?
Thank you
MiladaHi Madhu,
I have the same prob. How did you solve this?
Loaded all the Assets using AS91.
Did the manual entry to GL using OASV.
When i run the ABST2 Report , iam getting the below error message.
"Differences between assets and G/L accts in the balance carried forward
Message no. MQ555"
"Differences between assets and G/L accts at the key date Message no. MQ557"
When i checked with GL balance FAGLB03 and Asset Balance report the values match but for some reason getting this error and
Client want to see the 0.00 in Difference coloumn in ABST2. I did not run the depriciation yet. Do you think after running the depriciation it will show 0.00 in that coloumn ..
Appriciate your inputs.
Thanks,
Heera. -
ABST2 - How to take the report for the previous fiscal year
Hi,
For FI-AA reconciliation, my scenario is this: The current fiscal year is 2009 and the system (server) date is 16-Apr-2009. My fiscal year period is: Mar-Apr. In ABST2, it does not accept Fiscal year. When I take the report, it displays for fiscal year 2009, which I don't want because I want it for the fiscal year 2008 to reconcile between FI and AA. The fiscal year 2008 is not yet closed in both FI and AA, so I want the report for 2008 only. But ABST2 always gives the report for the current fiscl year. Is there any way out to get the report for 2008?.
Thanks,
Kannan SThis report is based on the actual values. In the past this report was used for EURO conversions to see if the values are in line. When not it was not possible to do the euro conversion.
Normal it is a part from the fiscal year closing -
Transaction ABST2 - Asset balance sheet values not completely posted
Hi,
An error message appeared when using transaction ABST2.
"Asset balance sheet values are not completely posted".
What can be the reason?
How can I check what is missing?
Thank you.
Kind regards,
LindaLinda,
Run a normal asset report on G/L account and compaire this with the values on the G/L account.
When there are differences you can use transaction code ABF1 with trans type 100. With this transaction you can post on the asset account whitout using an asset number.
The results in the transaction ABST2 is difficult to understand. This was a transaction that was used with the Euro conversion. When there are difference it dont block the fiscal year change.
Paul -
How to resolve difference in ABST2
Hi experts
I have executed the T-code ABST2 and found out the difference and this difference is matching with the difference between GL Account Balance and Asset History Sheet Report.
Now the questio nis "How to resolve/rectify this difference"
Kindly explain me how to remove this difference. I searched the forum with ABST2, but I did not find any answer for this.
Please help and the help would be highly appriciated.
Kind Regards
KishoreHi Paul
Thankyou so much for your reply.
I searched the forum with ABST2 and there are only 14 posts on this and I did not find solution in these for this. that is the reason why I raised a new query for this.
If you can explain atleast in brief that would be very great help for me.
Thanks & Regards
Kishore -
Hi
When executing TCode ABST2, the below msg displays:
Differences between assets and G/L accts in the balance carried forward
Message no. MQ555
Diagnosis
Differences occurred in the balance carried forward when comparing asset summary records and G/L accounts.
Procedure
Using program RFEWSBAL, select the accounts for which differences occurred. To do this, proceed as follows:
1. Changeover package: Active package
Phase: ANALYZE
Origin of change: AS
Proceed
2. Analyze the accounts containing errors using note 104567.
If the document number field contains the entry "W004", this means that although a difference exists in the balance carried forward, this difference was charged off at the key date. Following local currency changeover, the system adjusts the currency differences at the key date only, but not in the balance carried forward.
If the entry "W004" exists for all affected accounts, the status is set to warning instead of error. If the correction at key date described above proves sufficient, you can continue changing over the local currency without additional adjustments in the previous year.
However, SAP does recommend that you make corrections in the previous year in line with note 104567 since this ensures that the balance carried forward is also reconciled.
When 'proceeding' (TCode EWF1), Number of the changeover package is a selection criteria - how can this be identified?
Thanks in advance...............Have a look to SAP note 104567 for the possible difference reasons
When 'proceeding' (TCode EWF1), Number of the changeover package is a selection criteria - how can this be identified?
This program is used for Currency conversion to look if the values are correct and for that you are using a changeover package but that is not the case when you run ABST2 and there is no changeover package
For possible differences reasons you can search to on this forum with ABST2 -
Dear Experts,
I have a peculiar situation unable to understand the SAP Standard behavour, Please confrim below postings are correct.
Uploaded legacy Asset data through AS91 and checked GL account report(FBL3n) no values updated.
Then checked ABST2 - There is difference and the values appear as
Asset Acquisition value - rs. 15000 (which I have updated in AS91)
Accum Depreciaito A/c - rs. 1500 - (which I have updated in AS91).
Later I have passed an entry in OASV
Asset Acquition A/c DR - 15000
Accum Dep A/c Cr - 1500
Asset Clearing A/c Cr - 13500
Now I can see values in FBL3n Report (GL's Updated
But in ABTS2 by right there should be any values, but system is generated the difference as below.
Asset Acquisition value - rs. 15000 (which I have updated in AS91)
Accum Depreciaito A/c - rs. (1500) Credit (which I have updated in AS91)
Asset Acquisition value - rs. (15000)Credit
Accum Depreciaito A/c - rs. 1500
My understanding is system should knock of these debit/credit lines and there shouldn't be any values when we execute ABST2.
Please let me know if I miss any step or is it system standard behaviour.
My business wants the value should be zero if we execute ABST2, how can we acheive. Thanks.
Regards,
RajHi
Note 104567 point 3 d) explains the issue :-
Incorrect legacy data transfer:if there already exist differences
in the year of the legacy data transfer, the differences must
also be written off on the G/L account in the previous year.
Refer also to Note 69225. This error occurs especially when a
local currency changeover is performed directly in the year of a
mid-year legacy data transfer and the balance values of Asset
Accounting were not posted at the beginning of the year, that is,
on December 31 but on the key date of legacy data transfer to the
general ledger.You encounter this error when the system displays
pairs of entries in the list for the balance carried forward
(period is blank) and for the key date (period 999). -
Difference in ABST2 in non leading ledger for 2nd LC AA and 2nd LC GL
Hi,
While executing ABST2 there is difference in our non leading ledger ,we have recently created new dep. area 33 which updates the values in 2nd LC AA for non leading ledger but value in 2nd LC GL is different from what we have in Asset for non leading ledger Z1 .
When we check in FAGLL03 for Z1 ledger we came to know that Asset balance is updated from Local currency and GL values are updated from 2nd Local currency ,but in 2nd Local currency system has not post any entry and due to this there is difference.
We want the same value in non leading ledger Z1 for 2nd LC AA and 2nd LC GL.
Please let me know if there is any specefic settings required for the same.
We have mantain dep area 34 also as per SAP Note 1433535 but still there is difference in ABST2.
Thanks
AkshataHello Akshata,
If you want to setup a scenario in Fixed Asset Accounting, where
you post different valuations (local GAAP / IFRS) to a different ledger
group in G/L for parallel valuation, then you have to use (in total) 3
depreciation areas in the following way. For each additional "valuation"
for which you have additional ledgers defined in G/L, and for which you
want to get different values as those posted in area 01, you need also
two additional depreciation areas (1 real and and 1 derived area) in
asset accounting.
Please consider a correct definition of a parallel ledger scenario
is as follow: this is an example only
Posting to G/L Ledger
Area 01 HGB 1 0L > STATUTORY
Area XX IAS 3 LG > (IAS)
Area YY (IAS - HGB) 5 or 6 LG > (IAS)
Acquisition/transf/retirement postings in area 01 go to all ledgers
independently of your setting in OADB. And, if any difference occurs
between area 01 an area XX this is posted trough the derived area YY
(posting indicator 6).
This is the parallel ledger scenario logic and how the techinal
solution to this requirement was developped.
You can find more documentation about the so-called "Ledger Scenario" in
Asset Accounting for the purpose of parallel valuation in the SAP Help
Portal. You may find these links helpful:
a) Parallel Accounting in Asset Accounting
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/91/09f5400e517e7fe1000000
0a1550b0/content.htm
b) Parallel Valuation
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/4f/71ea61448011d189f000
00e81ddfac/content.htm
c) Making Settings for Parallel Ledgers in FI-AA
> this one documents my above explanation
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/0d/de3d83c78b48a28a44ad92
14239d57/content.htm
d) Example: Parallel Accounting and the Derived Depreciation Area
> this one describes how the derived area acts in the scenario
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/37/ebad814b3347e9bc5182c0
56d5bbd8/content.htm
kind regards
Ray -
ABST2 u0096 FA to g/l reconciliation program help
Hi all,
Can anyone tell me the steps to run the ABST2 (FI-AA to G/L reconciliation program) if the fiscal year is closed for fixed assets through AJAB transaction, i.e,. Fiscal year 2006 is closed for FA in a company and I have to run the reconciliation for 2006.
I see that we can undo the fiscal year close or reverse the year-end close through OOAQ and then run reconciliation program but what would be the implications of doing that since we have posted the depreciation for period 01/2007.
Thanks
KumarHello sapuser,
my case is;
I have a G/L account 3002040001, and this account is open item managed.
Bal.sheet adj.1 --> is 3002040001 and this account is open item managed, too.
Both accounts are balance accounts.
In this case, is it possible to valuate this account?
Best regards
Edited by: onuronuk on Oct 26, 2010 9:50 AM -
FA -. G/L Reconciliation program (RAABST02) ABST2 - transaction help
Hi all,
Can anyone tell me the steps to run the ABST2 (FI-AA to G/L reconciliation program) if the fiscal year is closed for fixed assets through AJAB transaction, i.e,. Fiscal year 2006 is closed for FA in a company and I have to run the reconciliation for 2006.
I see that we can undo the fiscal year close or reverse the year-end close through OOAQ and then run reconciliation program but what would be the implications of doing that since we have posted the depreciation for period 01/2007.
Thanks
KumarHi Deki,
I think the setup of "Account XXXXXX" is wrong. Using transaction code <b>FS00</b>, input the account number and the company code and press Enter. Click on the "<b>Control Data"</b> tab. Check if "<b>Line item display</b>" is ticked under the frame "Account Management in Company Code". If the answer is yes, you would have to untick this check box. <u><b>Reason:</b></u> Posting into Reconciliation accounts are memorandum entries and line item management are not allowed for such accounts. That is, they are control accounts. Save your entries and go back and re-execute transaction code <b>ABST</b>. You should no longer have the error.
I hope the above helps.
Do not forget to award the points please.
Regards,
Jacob -
Hi!
I'm trying to reconciliate GL accounts and fixed assets using tx ABST2 . My company has an interannual assets transfer date (31.10.2009) . This program tells me there's an error matching a depreciation GL account respect assets with accumulated depreciation and with this GL account involved.
I checked several times the uploaded data from both sources and it's matching all of them . But the program says there's an amount difference of 189.75 eur.This amount matches with proposed depreciation within november and december 2009 wich must not be included into uploaded data because transfer date is 31st october 2009 .
My question is: Is this transaction (ABST2) working in companies with interannual assets data transfer ?.
I've got other companies with not interannual transfer and it works properly.
Thanks in advance for your help!!
Kind regards
TristáLinda,
Run a normal asset report on G/L account and compaire this with the values on the G/L account.
When there are differences you can use transaction code ABF1 with trans type 100. With this transaction you can post on the asset account whitout using an asset number.
The results in the transaction ABST2 is difficult to understand. This was a transaction that was used with the Euro conversion. When there are difference it dont block the fiscal year change.
Paul -
An item for the Expense account for ordinary depreciat. appears in ABST2
Hello,
I hope you can give me some help on this.
When running ABST2, an item pertaining to the account "Expense account for ordinary depreciat." appears as a result. The amount appering in ABST2 is the amount of depreciation posted to this account in January 2010 when last depreciation was run.
How should the item be eliminated in ABST2? Thanks in advance.
Regards,
PeterDear Peter,
Does this amount appear as an amount in your GL and missing in your Asset Accounts, or vice versa.
Please, do check if there are any manual postings performed from FI, not from the depreciation program.
They will disappear from ABST2 when you reverse them from FI.
KR
Severina
Edited by: Severina Koleva on Feb 22, 2010 3:55 PM
Maybe you are looking for
-
Calling web service from oracle forms 10g
Problem Description: I'm following the steps as per the doc: http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/forms/htdocs/10gr2/howto/webservicefromforms/ws_10_1_3_from_forms.html to create a java stub to call external web service and then use java importe
-
Equium L40 - Lost sound in the headphone jack
Hi, Hoping someone can help. My current sound driver is Soundmax Integrated Digital HD Audio. And from what I remember has always been. I've downloaded it a few times from the Toshiba site for my computer and it always comes back to this driver. The
-
Shortly after installing FF29.0 I noticed that the bookmarks menu from the 'Menu Bar' - NOT the new one that appears on the right of the screen - was not working correctly: specifically, when right-clicking on a bookmark to look for 'Open in a New ta
-
How to obtain response from asyn bpel process invoked through java
I need to get the response from Asynchronous bpel process which im invoking through java using DeliveryPost method whose return type is void.
-
Hi, everyone. I have an issue in se80 code editor in change mode. My user has a developer rights(SSCR key). I can create new FM ,Groups, and other staff, and I can also modify parameters and atributes . So I've created a new group and new FM in se80,