ABST2

Hi All
we got the below error message in ABST2.
Message no: MQ555
Difference occured in the balance carried forward when comparing asset summary records and GL accounts.
please suggest us
thanks in advance
regards
prasad

Hi,
The accounts in the list must now be examined.The following procedure is recommended by SAP: (you can change the sequence).
a) Compare the last two fiscal years for the affected account with the balances display (FS10) in G/L accounting.If the closing balance and the opening balance are different, the balance carry forward program (SAPF011) must be started again for the current year.
b) Create two asset history sheets for the accounts affected.For performance reasons, you are recommended to restrict by account assignment or by asset classes.Enter 0020 as the sort version, the year-end of the previous year and the year-end of the current year as the report date and activate 'Posted depreciation'.If the opening and closing values of the asset history sheet are different, the fiscal year change should be repeated.If the opening and closing value differ after the fiscal year change, you should examine whether a fixed asset with capitalization date exists for which acquisition dates are missing.
Note that down payments and acquisition values are shown together in the asset history sheet while there are normally different reconciliation accounts for it.
An incremental takeover may be present and the accounts are not reconciled correctly.
c) The asset history sheet for the previous year does not agree if you cross-check the values.In this case, RAABST01 should be started for the account affected.If the balance carried forward is affected, the year-end closing must now be cancelled, a depreciation recalculation must be carried out, a depreciation posting may need to be carried out and the year-end must be closed again.
d) The opening balance values of the current year do not match the value of the balance display. There may be a variety of reasons for this.
The error occurs only on the business area level.In Financial Accounting in the previous year, you must post a transfer between the business areas directly to the account using ABF1/FB01.For the differences refer to RFEWSBAL.There is only a problem if there are values on the account for business areas for which there are no longer any assets.You can use these business areas as an offsetting account assignment for the differences. You can make the postings in same way as for Note 69225. As an alternative, you can deactivate the business area balance sheets. You can choose this solution if you activated the balance sheets by mistake.Upto now you did not reconcile FI-AA and FI-GL at business area level either.
Incorrect legacy data transfer:if there already exist differences in the year of the legacy data transfer, the differences must also be written off on the G/L account in the previous year. Refer also to Note 69225. This error occurs especially when a local currency changeover is performed directly in the year of a mid-year legacy data transfer and the balance values of Asset Accounting were not posted at the beginning of the year, that is, on December 31 but on the key date of legacy data transfer to the general ledger.You encounter this error when the system displays pairs of entries in the list for the balance carried forward (period is blank) and for the key date (period 999).
The problem also occurs if you manage reserves for special depreciation and have not reconciled the reserve for special depreciation balance sheet account during transfer or migration.
RAABST01 finds missing line items - these must be regenerated using RACORR05.
The account was posted manually.You can see this using the line item display of the account.These manual postings must be reversed.If necessary, a separate account that is not posted to by FI-AA must be created.(Also refer to Note 69225 - however, the adjustment posting has to be entered in the previous year.)
Account is an accumulated depreciation account:depreciation was reset by program during the fiscal year or fixed assets were deleted but depreciation had already been posted.Correct the values in the general ledger in the previous year (see Note 69225).
Account is not a reconciliation account of Asset Accounting:contact an SAP consultant. A serious Customizing error exists.However, this only applies to depreciation areas posting online.Customizing can be checked with the report RACKONT1 or via the IMG:'Preparations for productive operation --> Check consistency --> Assets: Report for G/L accounts'.
Start RAHAFA01 for the account with indicator 'Display special dep.If accumulated depreciations exist for different depreciation types (for example, normal or special depreciation, transfers of reserves), check whether accounts for these depreciation types are entered in the corresponding account assignment. If not, maintain the accounts.
Regards,
Eli

Similar Messages

  • ABST2 - Differences between Assets and G/L accts

    Hi Experts
    We are working on ECC 6.0 and INR is our local currency.
    At the end of FY 2007 by mistake direct postings were made to Dep Fund Account which is a Recon a/c and FY 2007 was closed
    And because of which FI-GL and FI-AA doesnt match by INR 37353.71 (amt posted in above doc) as shown in ABST2
    I've referred SAP notes 104567 & 69225 and found the note 69225 relevant to follow as the difference has not resulted in the current or open years.
    So we have passed direct entry which is exactly the reversal of entry posted above using ABF1 (INR -37353.71)
    After posting the 2nd document, in ABST2 another line has appeared of INR -37353.71. Although the sum for my recon GL is now zero.
    The output of ABST2 is as below now -
    Sc  Acct no.   BusA  Year  SG  1st local difference  LCurr  Doc.no.    Period
    AS  31100                2009               37,353.71-        INR     W004
    AS  31100                2009               37,353.71         INR     W004       999
    When I come out of ABST2 , addition to 1st, error no 2 is also coming which I thought would disappear.
    1.Differences between assets and G/L accts in the balance carried forward
         Message no. MQ555
    2.Differences between assets and G/L accounts at the key date
         Message no. MQ557
    Is still something else needs to be done?
    Or can I move ahead as the summation of the difference is now zero?
    Please suggest.
    Kapil

    We referred to SAP and they suggeted that the tagging of W004 in both the lines means that now there is no error even system prompts it as error.
    So we continued with the transactions and after closing the FY 2009, today when we run ABST2, we dont get any error messages as there is no difference left between Assets & GL.

  • ABST2 Error while doing Fixed Assets Closing

    Hi,
    I've run into an error of 0.01 in account 161370. I need to get past this or write off the difference in order to close the year..
    Note: For 2008 Fixed assets closing i have executed ABST2 transaction now in this July-2009.When i execute ABST2,i am getting the below report.
    CoCd  Acct no.   Year S  1st local difference 
    3000  161370      2009                   0.01-                
    Differences between assets and G/L accts in the balance carried forward
    Message no. MQ555
    Diagnosis
    Differences occurred in the balance carried forward when comparing asset summary records and G/L accounts.
    Procedure
    Using program RFEWSBAL, select the accounts for which differences occurred. To do this, proceed as follows:
    1. Changeover package: Active package
    Phase: ANALYZE
    Origin of change: AS
                Proceed
    1. Analyze the accounts containing errors using note 104567.
    If the document number field contains the entry "W004", this means that although a difference exists in the balance carried forward, this difference was charged off at the key date. Following local currency changeover, the system adjusts the currency differences at the key date only, but not in the balance carried forward.
    If the entry "W004" exists for all affected accounts, the status is set to warning instead of error. If the correction at key date described above proves sufficient, you can continue changing over the local currency without additional adjustments in the previous year.
    However, SAP does recommend that you make corrections in the previous year in line with note 104567 since this ensures that the balance carried forward is also reconciled.
    Kindly Help me in this regard
    Suvarna

    Hi,
    I've run into an error of 0.01 in account 161370. I need to get past this or write off the difference in order to close the year..
    Note: For 2008 Fixed assets closing i have executed ABST2 transaction now in this July-2009.When i execute ABST2,i am getting the below report.
    CoCd  Acct no.   Year S  1st local difference 
    3000  161370      2009                   0.01-                
    Differences between assets and G/L accts in the balance carried forward
    Message no. MQ555
    Diagnosis
    Differences occurred in the balance carried forward when comparing asset summary records and G/L accounts.
    Procedure
    Using program RFEWSBAL, select the accounts for which differences occurred. To do this, proceed as follows:
    1. Changeover package: Active package
    Phase: ANALYZE
    Origin of change: AS
                Proceed
    1. Analyze the accounts containing errors using note 104567.
    If the document number field contains the entry "W004", this means that although a difference exists in the balance carried forward, this difference was charged off at the key date. Following local currency changeover, the system adjusts the currency differences at the key date only, but not in the balance carried forward.
    If the entry "W004" exists for all affected accounts, the status is set to warning instead of error. If the correction at key date described above proves sufficient, you can continue changing over the local currency without additional adjustments in the previous year.
    However, SAP does recommend that you make corrections in the previous year in line with note 104567 since this ensures that the balance carried forward is also reconciled.
    Kindly Help me in this regard
    Suvarna

  • FI-AA reconci;lation- for year end closing(ABST2)

    Dear Team,
    This is with regard to Year end closure in Asset Accounting.
    we are using T.code ASBT2, which is giving the differences in FA and GL recon,
    can you suggest me the way to solve this Issue.
    I have tried the GL with FS10n and Assets report to find the difference from period.
    Issue is that as in the GL master the GL account is not flaged for Line item display, i am not able to view all the posting.
    I hope lot of people have gone through ..this Issue, please guide if there is any other way or some thing missing. please let me know.
    regards
    sgs

    hi,
    i am not able to view all the posting.
    -> use se16 for table bseg or reports like RFBPET00 to reconcile
    search in forum for abst2
    A.
    Message was edited by:
            Andreas Mann

  • ABST2 error messages MQ 555 and MQ 557

    Hi,
    I receive the error messages MQ 555 and MQ 557 in ABST2 transaction.
    We´ve done the ECC 6.0 upgrade (no new G/L activation), subsequent data conversion (migration - change transfer date) and
    EA-FIN activation.
    Is there any support note or package to fix the G/L - FA subledger reconciliation or it will be automatically solved in a new year?
    Thank you
    Milada

    Hi Madhu,
    I have the same prob. How did you solve this?
    Loaded all the Assets using AS91.
    Did the manual entry to GL using OASV.
    When i run the ABST2 Report , iam getting the below error message.
    "Differences between assets and G/L accts in the balance carried forward
    Message no. MQ555"
    "Differences between assets and G/L accts at the key date Message no. MQ557"
    When i checked with GL balance FAGLB03 and Asset Balance report the values match but for some reason getting this error and
    Client want to see the 0.00 in Difference coloumn in ABST2. I did not run the depriciation yet. Do you think after running the depriciation it will show 0.00 in that coloumn ..
    Appriciate your inputs.
    Thanks,
    Heera.

  • ABST2 - How to take the report for the previous fiscal year

    Hi,
    For FI-AA reconciliation, my scenario is this: The current fiscal year is 2009 and the system (server) date is 16-Apr-2009. My fiscal year period is: Mar-Apr. In ABST2, it does not accept Fiscal year. When I take the report, it displays for fiscal year 2009, which I don't want because I want it for the fiscal year 2008 to reconcile between FI and AA. The fiscal year 2008 is not yet closed in both FI and AA, so I want the report for 2008 only. But ABST2 always gives the report for the current fiscl year. Is there any way out to get the report for 2008?.
    Thanks,
    Kannan S

    This report is based on the actual values. In the past this report was used for EURO conversions to see if the values are in line. When not it was not possible to do the euro conversion.
    Normal it is a part from the fiscal year closing

  • Transaction ABST2 - Asset balance sheet values not completely posted

    Hi,
    An error message appeared when using transaction ABST2.
    "Asset balance sheet values are not completely posted".
    What can be the reason?
    How can I check what is missing?
    Thank you.
    Kind regards,
    Linda

    Linda,
    Run a normal asset report on G/L account and compaire this with the values on the G/L account.
    When there are differences you can use transaction code ABF1 with trans type 100. With this transaction you can post on the asset account whitout using an asset number.
    The results in the transaction ABST2 is difficult to understand. This was a transaction that was used with the Euro conversion. When there are difference it dont block the fiscal year change.
    Paul

  • How to resolve difference in  ABST2

    Hi experts
    I have executed the T-code ABST2  and found out the difference and this difference is matching with the difference between GL Account Balance and Asset History Sheet Report.
    Now the questio nis "How to resolve/rectify this difference"
    Kindly explain me how to remove this difference. I searched the forum with ABST2, but I did not find any answer for this.
    Please help and the help would be highly appriciated.
    Kind Regards
    Kishore

    Hi Paul
    Thankyou so much for your reply.
    I searched the forum with ABST2 and there are only 14 posts on this and I did not find solution in these for this. that is the reason why I raised a new query for this.
    If you can explain atleast in brief that would be very great help for me.
    Thanks & Regards
    Kishore

  • TCode ABST2 - Msg No MQ555

    Hi
    When executing TCode ABST2, the below msg displays:
    Differences between assets and G/L accts in the balance carried forward
    Message no. MQ555
    Diagnosis
    Differences occurred in the balance carried forward when comparing asset summary records and G/L accounts.
    Procedure
    Using program RFEWSBAL, select the accounts for which differences occurred. To do this, proceed as follows:
    1. Changeover package: Active package
    Phase: ANALYZE
    Origin of change: AS
                Proceed
    2. Analyze the accounts containing errors using note 104567.
    If the document number field contains the entry "W004", this means that although a difference exists in the balance carried forward, this difference was charged off at the key date. Following local currency changeover, the system adjusts the currency differences at the key date only, but not in the balance carried forward.
    If the entry "W004" exists for all affected accounts, the status is set to warning instead of error. If the correction at key date described above proves sufficient, you can continue changing over the local currency without additional adjustments in the previous year.
    However, SAP does recommend that you make corrections in the previous year in line with note 104567 since this ensures that the balance carried forward is also reconciled.
    When 'proceeding' (TCode EWF1), Number of the changeover package is a selection criteria - how can this be identified?
    Thanks in advance...............

    Have  a look to SAP note 104567 for the possible difference reasons
    When 'proceeding' (TCode EWF1), Number of the changeover package is a selection criteria - how can this be identified?
    This program is used for Currency conversion to look if the values are correct and for that you are using a changeover package but that is not the case when you run ABST2 and there is no changeover package  
    For possible differences reasons you can search to on this forum with ABST2

  • ABST2 - Values appear

    Dear Experts,
    I have a peculiar situation unable to understand the SAP Standard behavour, Please confrim below postings are correct.
    Uploaded legacy Asset data through AS91 and checked GL account report(FBL3n) no values updated.
    Then checked ABST2 - There is difference and the values appear as
    Asset Acquisition value  - rs. 15000 (which I have updated in AS91)
    Accum Depreciaito A/c - rs. 1500 - (which I have updated in AS91).
    Later I have passed an entry in OASV
    Asset Acquition A/c DR - 15000
    Accum Dep A/c       Cr - 1500
    Asset Clearing A/c  Cr - 13500
    Now I can see values in FBL3n Report (GL's Updated
    But in ABTS2 by right there should be any values, but system is generated the difference as below.
    Asset Acquisition value  - rs. 15000 (which I have updated in AS91)
    Accum Depreciaito A/c - rs. (1500) Credit (which I have updated in AS91)
    Asset Acquisition value  - rs. (15000)Credit
    Accum Depreciaito A/c - rs. 1500
    My understanding is system should knock of these debit/credit lines and there shouldn't be any values when we execute ABST2.
    Please let me know if I miss any step or is it system standard behaviour.
    My business wants the value should be zero if we execute ABST2, how can we acheive. Thanks.
    Regards,
    Raj

    Hi
    Note 104567 point 3 d) explains the issue :-
    Incorrect legacy data transfer:if there already exist differences
    in the year of the legacy data transfer, the differences must
    also be written off on the G/L account in the previous year.
    Refer also to Note 69225. This error occurs especially when a
    local currency changeover is performed directly in the year of a
    mid-year legacy data transfer and the balance values of Asset
    Accounting were not posted at the beginning of the year, that is,
    on December 31 but on the key date of legacy data transfer to the
    general ledger.You encounter this error when the system displays
    pairs of entries in the list for the balance carried forward
    (period is blank) and for the key date (period 999).

  • Difference in ABST2 in non leading ledger for 2nd LC AA and 2nd LC GL

    Hi,
    While executing ABST2 there is difference in our non leading ledger ,we have recently created new dep. area 33 which updates the values in 2nd LC AA for non leading ledger but value in  2nd LC GL is different from what we have in Asset for non leading ledger Z1 .
    When we check in FAGLL03 for Z1 ledger  we came to know that Asset balance is updated from Local currency and GL values are updated from 2nd Local currency ,but in 2nd Local currency system has not post any entry and due to this there is difference.
    We want the same value in non leading ledger Z1 for 2nd LC AA and 2nd LC GL.
    Please let me know if there is any specefic settings required for the same.
    We have mantain dep area 34 also as per SAP Note 1433535 but still there is difference in ABST2.
    Thanks
    Akshata

    Hello Akshata,
    If you want to setup a scenario in Fixed Asset Accounting, where
    you post different valuations (local GAAP / IFRS) to a different ledger
    group in G/L for parallel valuation, then you have to use (in total) 3
    depreciation areas in the following way. For each additional "valuation"
    for which you have additional ledgers defined in G/L, and for which you
    want to get different values as those posted in area 01, you need also
    two additional depreciation areas (1 real and and 1 derived area) in
    asset accounting.
    Please consider a correct definition of a parallel ledger scenario
    is as follow: this is an example only
                               Posting to G/L         Ledger
    Area 01 HGB                        1                   0L    > STATUTORY
    Area XX IAS                          3                   LG    > (IAS)
    Area YY (IAS - HGB)             5 or 6              LG    > (IAS)
    Acquisition/transf/retirement postings in area 01 go to all ledgers
    independently of your setting in OADB. And, if any difference occurs
    between area 01 an area XX this is posted trough the derived area YY
    (posting indicator 6).
    This is the parallel ledger scenario logic and how the techinal
    solution to this requirement was developped.
    You can find more documentation about the so-called "Ledger Scenario" in
    Asset Accounting for the purpose of parallel valuation in the SAP Help
    Portal. You may find these links helpful:
    a) Parallel Accounting in Asset Accounting
    http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/91/09f5400e517e7fe1000000
    0a1550b0/content.htm
    b) Parallel Valuation
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/4f/71ea61448011d189f000
    00e81ddfac/content.htm
    c) Making Settings for Parallel Ledgers in FI-AA
         > this one documents my above explanation
    http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/0d/de3d83c78b48a28a44ad92
    14239d57/content.htm
    d) Example: Parallel Accounting and the Derived Depreciation Area
         > this one describes how the derived area acts in the scenario
    http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/37/ebad814b3347e9bc5182c0
    56d5bbd8/content.htm
    kind regards
    Ray

  • ABST2 u0096 FA to g/l reconciliation program help

    Hi all,
    Can anyone tell me the steps to run the ABST2 (FI-AA to G/L reconciliation program) if the fiscal year is closed for fixed assets through AJAB transaction, i.e,. Fiscal year 2006 is closed for FA in a company and I have to run the reconciliation for 2006.
    I see that we can undo the fiscal year close or reverse the year-end close through OOAQ and then run reconciliation program but what would be the implications of doing that since we have posted the depreciation for period 01/2007.
    Thanks
    Kumar

    Hello sapuser,
    my case is;
    I have a G/L account 3002040001, and this account is open item managed.
    Bal.sheet adj.1 --> is 3002040001 and this account is open item managed, too.
    Both accounts are balance accounts.
    In this case, is it possible to valuate this account?
    Best regards
    Edited by: onuronuk on Oct 26, 2010 9:50 AM

  • FA -. G/L Reconciliation program (RAABST02) ABST2 - transaction help

    Hi all,
    Can anyone tell me the steps to run the ABST2 (FI-AA to G/L reconciliation program) if the fiscal year is closed for fixed assets through AJAB transaction, i.e,. Fiscal year 2006 is closed for FA in a company and I have to run the reconciliation for 2006.
    I see that we can undo the fiscal year close or reverse the year-end close through OOAQ and then run reconciliation program but what would be the implications of doing that since we have posted the depreciation for period 01/2007.
    Thanks
    Kumar

    Hi Deki,
    I think the setup of "Account XXXXXX" is wrong. Using transaction code <b>FS00</b>, input the account number and the company code and press Enter. Click on the "<b>Control Data"</b> tab. Check if "<b>Line item display</b>" is ticked under the frame "Account Management in Company Code". If the answer is yes, you would have to untick this check box. <u><b>Reason:</b></u> Posting into Reconciliation accounts are memorandum entries and line item management are not allowed for such accounts. That is, they are control accounts. Save your entries and go back and re-execute transaction code <b>ABST</b>. You should no longer have the error.
    I hope the above helps.
    Do not forget to award the points please.
    Regards,
    Jacob

  • Transaction ABST2

    Hi!
    I'm trying to reconciliate GL accounts and fixed assets using tx ABST2 . My company has an interannual assets transfer date (31.10.2009) . This program tells me there's an error matching a depreciation GL account respect assets with accumulated depreciation and with this GL account involved.
    I checked several times the uploaded data from both sources and it's matching all of them . But the program says there's an amount difference of 189.75 eur.This amount matches with proposed depreciation within november and december 2009 wich must not be included into uploaded data because transfer date is 31st october 2009 .
    My question is: Is this  transaction (ABST2) working in companies with interannual assets data transfer ?.
    I've got other companies with not interannual transfer and it works properly.
    Thanks in advance for your help!!
    Kind regards
    Tristá

    Linda,
    Run a normal asset report on G/L account and compaire this with the values on the G/L account.
    When there are differences you can use transaction code ABF1 with trans type 100. With this transaction you can post on the asset account whitout using an asset number.
    The results in the transaction ABST2 is difficult to understand. This was a transaction that was used with the Euro conversion. When there are difference it dont block the fiscal year change.
    Paul

  • An item for the Expense account for ordinary depreciat. appears in ABST2

    Hello,
    I hope you can give me some help on this.
    When running ABST2, an item pertaining to the account "Expense account for ordinary depreciat." appears as a result. The amount appering in ABST2 is the amount of depreciation posted to this account in January 2010 when last depreciation was run.
    How should the item be eliminated in ABST2? Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Peter

    Dear Peter,
    Does this amount appear as an amount in your GL and missing in your Asset Accounts, or vice versa.
    Please, do check if there are any manual postings performed from FI, not from the depreciation program.
    They will disappear from ABST2 when you reverse them from FI.
    KR
    Severina
    Edited by: Severina Koleva on Feb 22, 2010 3:55 PM

Maybe you are looking for