Account Determination for MM STO within One Company Code

Dear all;
Can any one tell me what will be the standard OBYC setting for MM STO within the company code.What will be the Posting keys .Kindly reply me in detail.
Thanking You;
Regards;
Joydeep Mukherjee

Hi,
No extar OBYC setting for MM STO as you alreday have BSX key assigned with G/L account.
STO within the company code which is called Intra-Company STO. Here all Control is on Schedule Line Categories where movement type linked to it and Schedule Line Category with item category which in turn then links to general item category which are need to be there in a material master for STO process.
You have process as
A. Create STO in ME21N with document type UB at Receiving Plant.
B. Create Delivery in VL10B from Supplying Plant
C. PGI in VL02N from supplying Plant
D. Goods Receipt in MIGO at Receiving Plant
No accounting document will be generated at GR but all the accounting document will be generated while doing PGI only. The accounting document as following:
At Supplying Plant: Stock Account : Cr
At Receiving Plant: Stock Account : Dr
If you maintain standard price at receiving Plant & if there is any Price Difference account will be triggered.
More check link:
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_05/helpdata/EN/4d/2b90dc43ad11d189410000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
Regards,
Biju K

Similar Messages

STO-Within same company code and same sales organisation

hi freinds
i need steps for STO Within same company code and same sales organisation "xyz" with different plant "X " and " Y"
with regards
dinesh

Hi,
Sales organization is linked to sending plant. It does not matter if receiving plant is using the same or different sales organization. The setup from sending plant is independent from that.
As for the STO standard setup, I suggest you search SDN first. Below example link.
STO setup article link:
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/index?rid=/library/uuid/c05e2251-91f0-2c10-4e91-e919468e4687
Regards,
Dominik Modrzejewski

GL account determination for vendor invoice in cross company sale sales

Hi
we are planning to implement cross company sales scenario.
High level design-
1) Sales Order is in co code X and the delivery is from group company lets say co code Y
2) The delivery from co code Y generates two invoices- one in Sales area of co code X for the final customer and 2nd in sales area of co code Y for the inter company
3) The intercompany invoice has EDI output type (Sap standard delivered object is RD04). The output generates a IDOC which has ability to post automatic vendor invoice in co code X crediting the inter company vendor Y.
4) The automatic vendor invoice GL account determination is via customisation OBCB and OBCE
I have some questions around this , particularly if in the vendor invoice we have to account for material and returnable packaging
In my current project there would FG packed in returnable packaging in co code Y
For Export there would be a dedicated co code(X).
Co code X gets orders from customers; and creates sales orders in its sales area with delivery plant of co code Y.
Along with FG returnable packaging is also charged as deposit by - co code X to customer and Co code Y to Co code X.
so in the vendor invoice how to generate the following entry
Inter company vendor              150 Cr
Cost of Goods sold         100 Dr
Returnable Packages deposit    50 Dr.
Similarly when the end customer returns the packaging generate the following entry via the cross company return order and intercompany invoice
intercompany vendor 50 Dr
Returnable packages 50 Cr
if you have worked on this kind of scenario and share how to customise to post for FG and Returnable packaging separately in the automatic vendor invoice it would be great.
Edited by: pravin_shah1403 on Nov 25, 2011 3:00 PM

Hi Pravin.
Did you figure this out?
I'm seeing that via OBCB we can hit only one G/L account.
We also need to hit multiple accounts.
We've figured out how to hit this via user-exit, however I'm hoping that I've missed something in configuration and that a resolution via configuration is possible?
Any ideas?

Add on Program to generate AP/AR for STO within a company code

I want to generate the add on Program to Generate the AP with referance to the Material Document.
Is it Possible to Create it and Update the G/L Automatically?
If yes , What are BAPI 'S can we use or Shall we use BDC?
Please share your ideas and Suggestions.

Assign plants c, d, e to same company code.
If you want to create a Stock Transfer Order,
maintain A as supplying plant. (create vendor master linked to purchase org and company code)
maintain c, d, e as receiving plants. (create customer masters linked to company code)
Ignore Plant B (if no changes to stock is happening there).
Do a 2 step stock transfer, when stock is in transit, after 1st step, you can assume stock is moving thru Plant B.
Settings For Stock Transport Order Without Delivery:
Order type UB
Item category U
GI: 351
GR: 101
Delivery type: Blank
Settings For Stock Transport Order with Delivery:
Order type UB
Item category U
GI: 641
GR: 101
Delivery Type: NL
If STO not needed, use 303 GI from Plant A and 305 GR in Plant C, D, or E thru MIGO.
If Plant B should be considered in stock transfer,
Just do a one or two step transfer from A to B, then from B to C, D or E.

Plant to Plant STO with excise invoice and taxes in one company code

Hi,
I have a new business requirement, we want to create only one company code and 12 plants in different states, each plant will have separate purchasing and sales activity this is ok this can be done with separate excise and series group as ther will not be any issue for purchsing and saling of materisl with exice in each plant , but how we can transfer the material plant to plant if the plant is in different states we want that the material should be transfer from palnt to plant with excise invoice only, as we have the company code common, how to create the billing document for this, and how to pass the duty from the saling plant and capture the same in the recieving plant. with proper tax entry. Can we do the STO with biiling if the two plants are in single compnay code.
regards,
zafar

hi,
I am trying to create a Stock Transport Order (STO) with document type UB and item category U. My objective is to transfer material from Plant (supplying plant) 100 to Plant (receiving plant) 1100 within one company code (1000) with STO.
For this purpose I created a raw material 1434 in plant 1000 with sales org 1 view and in that view entered in delivering plant field 1000 as delivery plant. After that I extended material 1434 to plant 1100 without changing anything what I did while creating the material first in Plant 1000 except in organizational level I entered 1100 in the plant field. I entered Sales org 1000 and distribution channel 10 in organization level for both plant while creating and extending the material. In me21n I chose Stock Transport Order with document type UB and item category as U also receiving Plant as 1100. With this when I tried to save the STO the message, I am getting an error, Cannot determine shipping data for the material 1434?
I am doing solely mm function why I need to create Customer master? In this case plant 1100 is the customer right?
Solution:
1. Mat.(1434) should be maintained in both the plants. (1000&1100).
2. Should have enough stock in supplying plant(1000).
3. Make its supplying plant as a vendor in vendor master record in receiving plant(1100).
4. Make it receiving plant as a customer in customization.
    Create customer (xd01) & and define the shipping data for plants in both the plants.
    Path: spro u2013 img u2013 m.mgmt u2013 purchasing u2013 po u2013 set up STO u2013 define shipping data (1 by1 )
    In Receiving plant (1100)                         In Supplying plant (1000)
    Customer num. 123345 (for ex.)              Customer num. -
(don't fill)
    Sales org.yyy
    Dist. Channel
    Sales div. y
5. Assign doc. Type is "NL" for intra company STO. If STO is inter company, Assign doc. Type is "NLCC".
    Position doc type is "UB"
    Enter supplying plant(1000) & doc type (NL) & checking rule (ex:01)
6. Assign doc. Type is "UB" to u'r plants.(PO)
    Go for new entries
    Enter supplying plant(1000) & Receiving plant (1100) & doc type (UB).
7. Create a PO, choose the doc type is `UB' & item cat.'U', Enter supplying plant as a vendor in PO of the receiving plant(1100).
8. Provide this num (PO) to SD people, they will do the delivery by using transactional code is VL10B.
9. Sales people they will provide "out bound delivery num".
10. Do the GR. In GR the second tab 05 out bound delivery instead of PO mov.type 101.
11. See the stock over view in the receiving & supplying plants.
thanking you

STO - Two plants within Different Company Codes

Hello,
Kindly help me out with this case, i want to create a STO for two plants within DIFFERENT company codes, so i've created all the required configuration and master data including creating the supplying plant as a vendor and the ordering plant as a customer, also all master data is maintained in both plants and i tried the scenario on the IDES system and it works okay so i know i'm on the right procedures. The problem is that i create the PO, but when i go to Transaction Code VL10B to create the delivery it gives me an error ( Delivery with no Line item not allowed ) even though there is more than enough stock in the storage location. Kindly help me out.

17.01.2010     Stock                            10.500,000      0,000      10.300,000
13.01.2010     Order     Totals record     100,000-     100,000      10.300,000
13.01.2010     Deliv.     Totals record     100,000-     100,000      10.300,000
17.01.2010     StLcSt     SLFR     10.500,000      0,000      10.300,000
13.01.2010     Order     Totals record     100,000-     100,000      10.300,000
13.01.2010     Deliv.     Totals record     100,000-     100,000      10.300,000
17.01.2010     BtchSt     123     10.500,000      0,000      10.400,000
13.01.2010     Deliv.     Totals record     100,000-     100,000      10.400,000
17.01.2010     BStLoc     123       /SLFR     10.500,000      0,000      10.400,000
13.01.2010     Deliv.     Totals record     100,000-     100,000      10.400,000
This is the whole table.
This is what i got. i believe that it is an availability check problem, i just can't see what is the solution.
SLFR is the Storage location of the issuing plant.

Delete G/L Accounts for one company code when transaction data exists

SAP transaction OBR1 can be used to reset transaction data.
If you execute this transaction for a specific company code, the FI transaction data of that company is deleted. Because of the procedure to keep FI and CO in line, also the CO data has te be deleted.
But you can not reset CO transaction data for one company code. You have to reset CO transaction data for a whole controlling area.
If you can not delete the FI and CO transaction data for a specific G/L account in one company code, you can not delete that G/L account.
There exists another solution for the deletion of FI and CO transaction data for one company code, and thus for the deletion of G/L accounts?
Thank you very much for your feedback.
Edited by: E. Deleu on Mar 3, 2008 3:42 PM

Helllo,
I believe the account group information is what you get when loading hierarchies. Please look into the hierarchy extractor 0GL_ACCOUNT_T011_HIER.
Regards,
Christoffer

One Account Statement for customer present in more than one company code.

Hi all,
We have requirement of printing one account statement for customer present in more than one company code.
Program RFKORD10 generates more than one statements for customer present in more than one company code.
Please suggest if any customiztion or program changes need to be done for above issue.
Thanks.

If customer is present in more than one company code then you can config in different co codes.
Now could you brief your requirement, i think you want to print only once and system should print in both company codes at one time. Is it like that?
Regards
Ashu

STO processing within Same Company Code with Billing/Invoice

Hello Guru's, I have been asked by our finance department to look at having billing/prices associated with our STO (UB) movements of stock within the same company code. We currently use a UB order type but obviously no billing is associated with the delivery type NL. We do have inter company STO's (order type NB) and have prices and billing associated with the delivery type NLCC.
I wanted to take a copy of the NB order type (copy to ZB) and attached to relevant elements in the IMG (assign doc type & define delivery types). I have done this in an open DEV client and have got a new PO created (ZB) and created a delivery, picked and confirmed the picking. I have got to a point of PGI and i get the following message ' Purchase order 45########## does not contain items for a stock transfer'
Firstly, do any of you trade via STO within the same company code and associate a billing document? The reason we want to is that our manufacturing plants want to charge a premium to the packing and distribution warehouse for the goods to get profit visibility. At the moment the standard cost of goods manufactured at our manufacturing plants transfers to our distribution plant at the same value.
If any of you have any ideas then please let me know.

Hi,
Pricing configuration for STO: -
In SPRO > MM > Purchasing > Conditions > Define Price Determination Process > Define Schema Determination > Determine Schema for Stock Transport Orders > Here assign Calculation Schema "RM2000" i.e. Stock Transfer Document to Schema Grp Pur. Org, STO Type (For e.g. UB) and Supplying Plant.
Calculation Schema "RM2000" has condition type P101 which will pick up the MAP of supplying plant automatically during creation of STO in ME21N ("Conditions" Tab).
You can create new freight / delivery cost conditions in M/06 for Margin and assign in pricing procedure "RM2000" in M/08 and also assign the Accrual Key to this and do the Account Determination for this Accrual Key in OBYC
At the time of PGI, following accounting entry will get generated;
Stock A/c - Dr - 110 INR (Receiving Plant)
Stock A/c - Cr - 100 INR (Supplying Plant)
Margin Account - Cr - 10 INR (Supplying Plant)

Defining Account Determination for Real-Time Integr

Dear all,
I haven't understood yet about Account determination for the real-time integration of Controlling (CO) with Financial Accounting (FI).
Please tell accounting process that use this account. And give me a detail example.
Thanks so much
Minhtb

Hello
This is the new feature in New GL accounting
During allocations in Controlling, most of the postings created do not affect Financial Accounting. These postings do not update any G/L account transaction figures; they are postings within Controlling. If, however, an allocation in Controlling leads to a change in the functional area or any other characteristic (such as Profit Center or Segment) that is relevant for evaluations in Financial Accounting, a shift occurs between the affected items in the profit and loss statement. For this reason, this information has to be transferred to Financial Accounting. This reconciliation between Controlling and Financial Accounting takes place by means of real-time integration.
As a result of real-time integration, all Controlling documents that are relevant for General Ledger Accounting are transferred from Controlling to General Ledger Accounting in real time. This means that Financial Accounting is always reconciled with Controlling.
A document is created in Financial Accounting for each posting in Controlling. This means that the detailed information contained in the CO documents is always available in reports in New General Ledger Accounting. This information can be sorted by the following, for example:
●     Functional area
●     Cost center
●     Internal order
Real-time integration replaces the reconciliation postings from the reconciliation ledger. Consequently, you do not need a reconciliation ledger.
If, however, you do not set the Reconciliation Ledger Active indicator in Customizing for the controlling area, you cannot use the reports belonging to report groups 5A* (5AA1-5AW1). You set this indicator in Customizing for Controlling under General Controlling ® Organization ® Maintain Controlling Area. The reconciliation ledger serves as the data source for reports belonging to the report groups 5A*. You find these reports in the SAP Easy Access menu under Accounting ® Controlling ® Cost Element Accounting ® Information System ® Reports for Cost and Revenue Element Accounting.
Replacement reports are available as follows:
●     You find the reports in the SAP Easy Access menu under Accounting ® Controlling ® Cost Element Accounting ® Information System ® Reports for Cost and Revenue Element Accounting (New).
●     You can create additional reports in report group 5A21. You can assign the report group to any drilldown report of New General Ledger Accounting using the report-report interface.
●     From the report Financial Statements Actual/Actual Comparison, you can call up the report Cost Elements: Breakdown by Company Code. You find the report Financial Statement: Actual/Actual Comparison in the SAP Easy Access menu under Accounting ® Financial Accounting ® General Ledger ® Information System ® General Ledger Reports (New) ® Balance Sheet/Profit and Loss Statement/Cash Flow ® General ® Actual/Actual Comparisons.
You can define account determination for each controlling area. You do this in Customizing for Financial Accounting (New) under Financial Accounting Global Settings (New) ® Ledgers ® Real-Time Integration of Controlling with Financial Accounting ® Account Determination for Real-Time Integration. In this way, you use the same account determination as for the reconciliation ledger (transaction OK17). You can then use the reconciliation ledger reports to compare FI balances with CO balances.
Prerequisites
If you use real-time integration in at least one company code, you need to have activated company code validation for the related controlling area. You do this in Customizing for Controlling under General Controlling ® Organization ® Maintain Controlling Area ® Activate Components/Control Indicators. Otherwise, the reconciliation between Financial Accounting and Controlling at company code level is not possible.
In Customizing for Financial Accounting (New), you have processed the IMG activities under Financial Accounting Global Settings (New) ® Ledgers ® Real-Time Integration of Controlling with Financial Accounting.
Activate real-time integration for all company codes between which you want to make CO-internal allocations.
In the IMG activity Define Variants for Real-Time Integration, do not select all CO line items for transfer. If the same line items are to be transferred as through the reconciliation posting from the reconciliation ledger, select the following line items:
●      Cross-Company Code
●      Cross-Business Area
●      Cross-Functional Area
●      Cross-Fund (if you use Public Sector Management)
●      Cross-Grant (if you use Public Sector Management)
Features
Value flows within Controlling that are relevant for General Ledger Accounting such as assessments, distributions, confirmations, and CO-internal settlements are transferred immediately. The FI documents are posted with the business transaction COFI. They contain the number of the CO document. This means that you can call up the CO document from the FI document, and vice versa.
Activities
If a document could not be transferred because the posting period was blocked in Financial Accounting or no account was found, for example, the document is included in a postprocessing worklist. You need to check this worklist regularly and process any documents in it. From the SAP Easy Access menu, choose Accounting ® Financial Accounting ® General Ledger ® Corrections ®Post CO Documents to FI.
Example
An internal order for business area 0001 is settled to a cost center of business area 0002. The document from this allocation is transferred in real time to Financial Accounting.
Reg
assign points if useful

"Account determination for entry CHFS BSX 37AP not possible" -goods receipt

I have a student using ECC 6.0 getting the following message when posting a goods receipt for a purchase order:
"Account determination for entry CHFS BSX 37AP not possible"
This is in the Fitter Snacker configuration phase 2 client, but now doing the configuration for the Marshall Muffler Company case. No other student has this message. I have checked everything that I can think of -- company, plant, purchasing organization, G/L account numbers, vendors, materials, quanity and value updating, valuation grouping code, automatic postings for inventory posting (BSX), controlling area, .. but cannot find anything amiss.
Can anyone help with this? We are client 625 on the moscow server at Chico. The student is user 625-037, using 37 as a prefix for the various components e.g. company code 37MM. One PO for exampe is 4500000116. The student has created a number of orders trying to get it to work. Strangely, the student did get one raw material received on one PO for a vendor earlier, but now cannot do so.

1st thing to do is understand the error message format. - comp. code - transac - valuation class. so you need to tackle BSX part.
goto transaction code OMS2 make sure the Mtype for Raw materials (RM) , Semifinished (SP) and Finished (FP) is selected for Quantity / Value updating tick box. You can check this by going clicking Quantity/valur updating on left hand panel.
then goto transaction code OBYC for BSX transaction , make sure your plant it is assign to the correct valuation classs 3000. save everything.
now try goto transaction code MIGO to cerate the GR again. Normally if you don't maintain the BSX properly, you bond to have similiar error for WRX. so please make sure that is also taken care off.
Now you should be fine creating the GR. Good luck.

Implication for keeping one Company Code

Hi All,
Can some one give me implications or disadvantage of having one company code. The scenario I am doing rollout for Germany and Germany is having their branches in Spain, France, Sweden and Switzerland.
Over here Germany is main office and all other countries are branches of Germany. Now there are into non SAP. Only Germany has sale and purchase authority of on behalf of Spain, France and Switzerland and their customer and vendors are in Germany company code. And Sweden has its own sales and purchase. Also all the asset which are purchased in Spain France countries belongs to Germany. Now We are doing rollout for these countries and having MM,SD, FI (AP,AR, Asset, Cost center accounting, Profit center Accounting and Profitability Analysis)
My client wants to go for one company code i.e Germany so all the purchase and sale of Sweden will come under Germany company code. And Sweden has its local currency as Krona.
Now what will be implication or disadvantage on Chart of Account, B/S, P and L, Currency Reporting, Foreign Currency Evaluation, Intrastat reporting, TAX ect.
I am also convincing client to go for 2 company code
So f some one can guide me that will be very help full
Thanks in Advance.
Regards
Kiran.
Edited by: Kiran C on Oct 7, 2008 3:21 AM

hi....
You may define profit centers and company codes independently of each another.
In a company code, you can assign transactions to one or more business areas.
you can post a business area to several company codes and use it for cross-company-code
reporting.
so its possibe that one business area being used for more than one company code
regards

Error msg in MIGO: Account determination for entry not possible

hello when i am doing a goods movement, i get the message Account determination for entry DART WRX DFGX ___ 3200 not possible.

Dear,
check one moresettings VC/Plant assigned to Valuation grouping code through T.code OMWD.
Regards,
Kishore K

Account determination for movement type 251

Hi!
While checking account determination for logistic movements, I find that according to standard customizing, movement type 251 is related to account modification VBR. You can easily see this: OMJJ --> Check movement type --> type "251" --> Select "Account Grouping".
Now my question: what I don't understand is why VBR and not VAX. GBB-VBR is the transaction key + account modification for internal goods issues (such as consumptions of material) and it's accordingly associated to movements types 201, 261, etc. which seems logical to me since these are internal GI's.
Now, 251 is IS-Retail movement type to reflect a POS sale, "GI for sales" as the short text indicates, so it is not an internal goods issue but rather an external one, not different from movement type 601, which is a normal sale and is associated to GBB-VAX. GBB-VAX is the transaction key + account modification for sales goods issue.
I know I could easily copy 251 to create another movement type and assign any account modification to it, that's not the issue. The only problem is that I must explain to my client how account assignments work, and I cannot find a single reason why in standard SAP IS-R an external goods issue (251) is associated with an internal goods issue account modification (GBB-VBR).
Any ideas? Thanks in advance.

hi
for inventory use
gbb>inv
umbfor inventory and material val
prv for prise diffrence
in 702 prv and inv is the postings
for 309 vbr and pru is transaction in gbb
1) one more thing u can do is go to OMWb then go to simulation there u can find gl accounts and grouping keys note down that GL nos
2) then come one step back
and clik on gl accounts there u will find many gl accounts
find gl accont no which u have noted in step 1
there u can find transaction keys
by doing this u can find which are transaction keys for a perticular movement type
reward if helpful
regards
kunal

Account determination for posting area "1040

Hi
While creating a check lot we're getting the error as
"In account determination for posting area "1040" (interim account for incoming payments), your specifications are either incomplete or missing.
The transaction affects company code UINF and currency USD."
Any clue about the reason
Regards,

Hi ,
Maintain the interim account for incoming payments through the T.code FQC0.
Regards,
Konakanchi

Account Determination for MM STO within One Company Code

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for