Actual cost for Material - Very Very urgent

< MODERATOR: Message locked. Please read the [Rules of Engagement|https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki?path=/display/home/rulesofEngagement] before posting next time. >
Dear All,
I have a very urgernt requirement.
My client wants to prepare MIS report, in which they need details of actual costs of FG i.e cost sheet (which includes RM qty/cosst, PM Qty/cost & overheads). We have not yet got any ABAP report developed for the same.
We have just 2 days to work this issue.
Can any one proivde some solution to this
Regards,
Ankita

Can i take some field values from process order and map it in SQVI query to get data ???
Regards,
Ankita

Similar Messages

Production costs for material with price control V

Dear all,
Can anyone pls tell me, how will the costing occur for a material produced in-house and having price control 'V' ? I am not able to see the target costs.
Also kindly tell me the settings to be done in CO, like target cost version, valuation variant, costing variant, etc.
Thank you,
Shrenik

Rather than giving my own versions I have compiled here SAP inputs. Pl let me know if you require any clarifications:
Costing variant has the following components:
Define Costing Types
Define Valuation Variants
Define Date Control
Define Quantity Structure Control
Define Transfer Strategy
Define Reference Variants
Costing type:
In the costing type, you define the purpose of a material cost estimate by specifying, for example, which field in the material master record the costing results can be transferred to:
Update Cost Estimate
Standard price Standard cost estimate (01)
Tax-based price Inventory cost estimate
Commercial price Inventory cost estimate
Price other than std price Modified standard cost estimate or
current cost estimate
No update Any cost estimate
Define Valuation Variants:
Define Valuation Variants
Here you create a valuation variant containing the parameters required for valuation of a cost estimate.
You also specify which costing sheet should be used to calculate overhead.
Valuation Strategies
Material valuation
Here you define the sequence in which the system searches for prices from the accounting view or costing view of the material master record to valuate materials. You can also access prices from purchasing info records and condition types.
For material cost estimates, you also specify whether additive costs can be added to the selected price.
With configurable/configured material components and with procurement alternatives, the sequence defined here is ignored if the strategy "price from purchasing info record" was selected, in which case that strategy is always executed first. For more information, refer to the SAP Library in the component Product Cost Planning under Raw Material Costing or Mixed Costing.
Activity Types / Processes
Here you define the sequence in which the system searches for prices in activity type planning or actual activity price calculation in Cost Center Accounting or Activity-Based Costing to valuate the utilized activity types and business processes.
You also specify which plan/actual version is used.
Subcontracting
Here you define the sequence in which the system searches for prices in the purchasing info record. In purchasing, quota arrangements are used to create a mixed price for materials that are manufactured with external vendors with parts provided by the customer. You can specify whether the quota of the individual vendors that are entered in the source list for the material to be processed should be determined through the planned quota arrangement or the actual quota arrangement.
External processing
Here you define the sequence in which the system searches for prices in the purchasing info record or routing operation for valuation of the external activities.
Strategy Sequence
You define the individual valuation methods for the valuation variant as strategy sequences. For the valuation of the material components you define a strategy sequence that reads the fields of the material master record in a particular sequence such as:
1. Planned price 1
2. Standard price
3. Moving price
The first price that is not zero is used to valuate the material component.
Target versions:
Target cost versions are used in the following ways:
In variance calculation:
To control which variance (total variance, production variances or planning variance) is calculated
To valuate unplanned scrap( scrap variance)
Unplanned scrap is valuated in the period-end closing activities when the variances are calculated. You can specify in a valuation variant for WIP and scrap which cost estimate you want to use to calculate the target costs for the valuation of unplanned scrap. You assign the valuation variant to target cost version 0 if you want to include it in the valuation of scrap.
When you are using a cost object hierarchy with active distribution, you use the target cost version to control which cost estimate the system uses to calculate the target costs, which are used as the basis for determining equivalences for actual cost distribution.
The actual costs collected at the level of the hierarchy are distributed across the orders in accordance with these equivalences. This distribution is proportional to the target costs for the cost element under which the actual costs are written. Actual costs for material costs are distributed in proportion to the target costs for the origin group, such as for the material, if you have entered an origin group in the costing view of the material master record and have set the indicator Material origin, for example.
If no target costs were calculated under this cost element, enter a cost element group in the target cost version. The actual costs are distributed in proportion to the target costs for this cost element group. This cost element group should be complete. If costs were updated under a cost element that is not in this cost element group, no distribution is possible.
You can calculate equivalences on the basis of SAP standard target cost versions 0, 1 and 3.
The standard system supplies the following target cost versions:
Target cost version 0 ( total variance)
The amount of the total variance generates a posting in Financial Accounting during settlement.
For this version, select actual costs as the control costs and standard cost estimate as the target costs.
Target cost version 1 ( production variance)
For this version you choose actual costs as the control costs and planned costs as the target costs.
Target cost version 2( planning variance)
With target cost version 2, the costs from the preliminary order cost estimate are interpreted as control costs.
For this version, select planned costs as the control costs and current cost estimate as the target costs. You cannot calculate planning variances for the product cost collector.
Target cost version 3 (production variance of the period)
You compare the planned costs of the period calculated on the basis of an alternative material cost estimate (such as a modified standard cost estimate) with the actual costs of the period on the basis of the yield delivered to stock in the period.
The base quantity for variance calculation is the yield.
For this version, you choose the actual costs as the control costs and the alternative material cost estimate as the target costs. To determine the alternative material cost estimate, enter a costing variant and choose a costing version.
The target cost version specifies which data is to be compared. The target cost version also specifies which variance variant is used and therefore which variance catagories are calculated. You can define a different target cost version for each controlling area

Actual costs for laboratory exams / Material Ledger

Hi Experts
I have a doubt for actual cost scenario for laboratory industry.
My background is for product cost for consumer goods, specially food companies, so this is a new segment for me.
This laboratory has baseline version, no service/production order, it means all material consumption goes to cost center and they use activities to send costs from cost center to cost center.
They have BOM for all exams (finished product). They only run CK40N for standard costs but they don't have actual cost (material ledger - CKMLCP) implemented.
This is the issue: they want actual cost for every exam in the way we have for consumer goods industry.
So they can analyse profitability for product (exam) x customers.
I wounder if the same industry actual cost scenario can be applied to this business segment or if there is a special SAP solution for this segment.
The main issue is the stock, there is no stock, it´s service. I believe we could change the account in BSX key (OBYC) for some P&L accounts but I´d like your opinion/experience.
I hope you help me to clarify these doubts
Thanks in advance.

Dear Rupesh,
I don't think so there will be any std.report in PS module to show plan vs actual cost of material component.
For looking plan vs actual cost in PS having many std reports but they don't show for material component.
I think for this you need to develop a Z report which will show Plan vs Actual cost of material component.
In CN52N report (Component overview report) you can add two fields one is for plan cost & other for actual cost.This can be one of possibilty you can try.Otherwise develop a new Z report for the same.
For this you need to take yr abaper's help.
Regard's
Sandeep

Actual cost of material in COPA

Hi Team,
We have implemented PP, CO & COPA our client has the requirement to see the actual cost of material in COPA as per their requirement we designed the KE30 report as product wise profitability report in that report we used the record types B( direct postings from FI), C(Order settlement), D(over head cost) from the copa assessment cycle & F ( SD billing).
1) Is it possible to see the actual cost of material( Including activity cost) in copa.
2) If it is possible please advise.

Hello
It is not possible to get the actual cost of the material in COPA. Actual cost can only be derived if you implement material ledger.
However in COPA we may come close to actual cost to some extent. The following configuration needs to be done:
1. Run standard cost estimate every month so that the price reflects the most recent material prices.
2. Define assessment cycles for auxiliary cost centers (whose cost should form part of inventory cost) to production cost centers.
3. Configure for splitting and revaluation at actual price.
4. Take the production variances to COPA.
5. Create a report to show the standard cost and variances.
One of the difference is that the total standard cost is for the quantities sold during the period however the variances will be for the quantities produced during the period.
Another difference is that the unabsorbed overheads could not be allocated to individual materials.
Hope this helps.
Sangram

How to analyse actual cost for each operation in Process/Production Order?

Hi all,
IN SAP, I know that we can analyze plan cost for Operation in Process Order/ Production Order.
However, I can not analyze Actual cost for Operation .
I know the object when I good issue material is ORDER, not OPERATION.
But, as requirement of users, they want to analyze actual cost for each Operation.
CAn SAP do this analyze?
If Yes, What should I do in SAP to have this reports?
THanks in advance,
Emily Nguyen

Hi Emily,
as I see from one other message that you're using material ledger. Then your expectation is apparently to also see the actual costs of materials in your production order by operation.
This is not supported. Actual material costs are handed up in material ledger multi-level settlement from one material to the next, bypassing the production orders.
That means the production order will always contain the material costs valuated at plan price, not at actual price.
For activity prices that might be better, when you revalue the orders at actual activity prices with CON2. But even there I am not sure that it will always be assigned correctly to the operations.
There is currently an enhancement in development, the operation level costing. But that will affect more the planned cost side not the actuals. Might be interesting to learn more about your requirements and the use case behind.
best regards,
Udo

How to Post Actual Costs for Overhead

Hi All,
Kindly let me know the steps or T-Code as to how to post the actual costs for the Overheads.

Hi
Use the t.code KGI2 and post the actual costs for the Overheads.
Award points if it is useful.
Thanks & Regards,
A.Anandarajan.

Actual cost for the Process Orders

Hi Experts,
I want to know the actual cost for total one month process orders.
I can check actual cost for each order in COR2- by entering in to cost analysis.
But, my request is, where to check actual cost for One perticular product for the total month (ex: 100 Orders) or certain period.
can eny body give solution by sparing your precious time.
adv. thanks and regards,
Anand.M (Hyderabad)

Hi,
Try MCRI / MCRY or check the table entries of S027
Regards,
Srini

Total actual cost for a given PM Order

hello all,
how do i get total actual cost for a given PM order (in IW33 under cost tab we have total actual cost)..
is stored in table or do i need to use any function module.....
thanks in advance....

Hi Vinay,
You can use the following logic for extracting the Actual cost of a PM order.
Pass the Order No (AUFNR) in Table AUFK and fetch the Object number (OBJNR).
Pass OBJNR value in table COEP.
You can get the actual cost of the order in COEP table.
Please mark this as correct if it resolves your issue.
Regards,
Joydeep

Plan/Actual cost for Deleted Material - reg

Hello,
Actually iam assigning one BOM to activicity.
Now i have released the project,after this in cns41 plan and actual costs r flowing correctly.
Now i have deleted that BOM from activity and saved the project also,
now again in cns41 the same BOM cost was flowing in Planded data,
pls give solution for this....
--Prakash.

Hi Manish,
Thanks for ur support,
but iam getting this error message,
Typ Ite Message text LTxt
 000 The project info database reconstruction starts with: 1 Projects
 000 Processing is complete
 000 No value category could be determined for cost element 1000 50200000
this error was coming thg cjen
--Prakash

Posting Actual Costs at Material Level

Hi All
For our standard costs we will have BOM Components, Activities from Routings and additive costs. We also have activated Material Ledger and will use it for Actual Costing, the objective being that each and every actual cost will be brought to the SKU level. For BOM components and activities that is no problem since it will be done through settlement.
However for cost components that have additive costs how do we settle them to the material ledger? Do we need to do MR22 for difference between standard and actual? Is there a way to do this through a template allocation or some other allocation method?
Thank you

Hi
Lets assume, you have Std cost of 100 USD involving Material + Labor and an additive cost of 10 USD entered manually from CK74N...
During production order processing - You would issue material components and confirm Labor hrs... Say, this amounts to 120 USD as against the std cost of 100 USD...
However, in prod orders, there will be nothing posted against the additive std cost of 10 USD... If you wish, you need to post it either through template allocation from some cost centers or use some assessment cycle or transfer manually from KB11N or use a costing sheet
Regards
Ajay M

Release actual cost in Material Ledger

Dear Experts
I want to copy the actual cost of period 1 to be standard of period 2.
I did the following activities:
1- I run all steps for standard cost estimates for year 2012 and released the standard cost estimate for periods 1-12.
2- On January 2012, I did all steps in CKMLCP up to post closing. This is done mid night 12:01 (01.02.2012).
3- I run marking CKMPRPN, I checked "Manual Date" 01.02.2012 and in "Rule Maintenance" I selected "Perioic unit price in previous period. There was no error but when I check MM03 for a specific material there is nothing in coulumn "Future Price"
4- I run CKME and got error "C+811"
Please advise how to copy actual PUP to be standard of next period.
Regards
Ahmed Zain

Dear Maria
Taking all the above contribution in consideration, they are valuabe. Yours has hit my direct problem. I need the following calrifications, please :
1- In CKMLCP is it a must that marking and release of PUP takes place after "Post Closing Step" or I need to do them right away after "Revaluation of consumption step" , then do post closing? in other words, does the PUP will be calcuated after this step b"Revaluation" and can be subject to carry forward for next period. If this is true then we can select manually the next period and do the post closing.
2- My understanding to note 666681 is that, by the end of current period "Feb, 2012", I do all CKMLCP steps up to post closing, then I mark PUP - select manual date 01.03.2012 ( correct me whether it will be 01.03.2012 or 01.04.2012). If I check MM03 for any material I can see PUP in Future colunmn in costing 2 view. By the end of Period 3, I will run CKME for the marked PUP and so on...
Your torsh is required to throw more light in this corner, please
Thanks
Ahmed

Actual Costs for Production Order

Hi All
I have a scenerio where they dont want any product costing methods say WIP,Variance calculation & Settlement.
When the Goods receipt is done for production order the actual costs and the Activity costs to be valuated.
Regards
Jayshankar.A

Hi,
In our case the Standard price is updated in the material master. For this, you need to create a costing estimate using T-Code CK11N and update & release in CK24.
When CK11N is executed the standard price is calculated for the material by taking Moving Avg Price of RM (Price indicator V) and the activity costs are calculated as per data given in KP26. These cost components are added and a final cost estimate is prepared, which is updated using T Code CK24.
the pre-requisites are:
1. BOM should be maintained.
2. Routing should be made.
For executing the same procedure for all the materials, you can use T Code CK40N.
Hope this is what you were looking for.
Revert for further details.
Regards,
Rohit.

SAP allows release of Standard Cost for Material with Moving Average Price

Hi
We set our Raw Material to use Moving Average Price (V) and price determination 2 (single level). And we activated material ledger.
During mass calculation of standard cost (CK40N), If user accidentally forgot to restrict the Raw Material for being included in calculation, the system calculate standard cost anyway, even though I set it as Moving Average Price. And user is able to release it too without any problem.
Why the system does not restrict it? By giving error maybe. Although as for now I can not find the wrong effect from releasing standard cost for MAP material, by your experience, is there any side effect that I should be aware of?
Thanks

CK40n is mass release of all materials. The release is not dependent on price indicator of the material in the master. It will calculate standard cost of all the materials.
Releasing standard cost estimate of raw materials does not have any side effect as long your calculation is based on moving average price.
Regards
Divraj

Confirmation with errors in calc. actual costs for PM-order

Hi,
We have a PM-order with notifications and good movements that has tecnical completion status and is already settled. So we want to set it with bussines completion status, but an error arises: "Unprocessed future change recs for order 5009385 prevent del. flag/completion"
We already checked for automatic goods receipt pending, backflushes, etc. and the only found is an error record in actual costs calculation (trn. COFC). Looking at this record the message says: "No prices could be determined for object Activity type CONA/900097/PM-100" (message KW 407).
We checked price set for the activity type and cost center and is set for all the periods of actual fiscal year. Then looking at the details for above message, we found the following: "No price could be found for object Activity type CONA/900097/PM-100 with price indicator 7 and value type 4"
The question is: why system is trying to get price for activity type PM-100 with price indicator 7 instead of 3 as usual for our PM-orders? How price indicator is defined from actual PM-order parameters? Any idea?
Regards,
mr.

Hi
Whats your activity type category? I believe it should be 1
Your point is right, price indicator shud be 3 because while confirmation system uses the planned rate.. And price indicator pertains to actual activity price..
Check whether you have calculated or maintaned actual activity price or not in KBK6
Ajay M

Calculating Actual Cost for Time Confirmation using a BAPI

Does anyone know how to calculate the Actual Cost when creating a time confirmation for a Plant Maintenance work order? I am using BAPI_ALM_CONF_CREATE to create the time confirmation for a work order, but there does not appear to be any options that will calculate the Actual Costs. This functionality would be similar to what occurs in transaction IW41 when creating a time confirmation.
I tried the suggestions on the OSS notes for BAPI_ALM_CONF_CREATE, but they do not seem to work.
We have developed Custom Screen using a handheld device to have production personnel enter there time spent working on a piece of equipment. Basically we are trying to get the same results on the handheld as we would get using IW41 where it runs the cost calculation based on the hourly rate setup in FICO.

Does anyone know how to calculate the Actual Cost when creating a time confirmation for a Plant Maintenance work order? I am using BAPI_ALM_CONF_CREATE to create the time confirmation for a work order, but there does not appear to be any options that will calculate the Actual Costs. This functionality would be similar to what occurs in transaction IW41 when creating a time confirmation.
I tried the suggestions on the OSS notes for BAPI_ALM_CONF_CREATE, but they do not seem to work.
We have developed Custom Screen using a handheld device to have production personnel enter there time spent working on a piece of equipment. Basically we are trying to get the same results on the handheld as we would get using IW41 where it runs the cost calculation based on the hourly rate setup in FICO.

Actual cost for Material - Very Very urgent

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for