Actual cost value appears duplicated

Hi!.
When I confirm an internal activity on the project system, actual cost value seems to be duplicated. Customizing procedure has been properly performed. Activity Type Price is set to 22 / hour and after confirming one hour, actual cost value appears as 44 .
Does anybody have a clue why this is happening?.
Thanks in advance!

Dear Raul,
The Controlling Area currency is different of the Company currency?
The Planning layout in CO defines where currency the price is planned.
In PS the reports standards are in controlling area currency.
Please verifies and send me the result from this error.
Best Regards
Elza

Similar Messages

Actual cost value in report CJI3 & s_alr_87100185 report is not matching

Hi,
We are executing the report CJI3 & s_alr_87100185 for month of December.
Values in the both reports are not getting matched.
Please help me...
Regards,
Pradip Shelke

Dear Sam
While using the standard report CJI3 - Project Information System - Actual Cost, choose the column "Business Transaction" and apply a filter for "Not Equal To" KOAO - Settlement.
It will display only the actual cost for the project excluding the settlement line items.
Hope this helps...
Regards
Kaashif M

Tabale for Actual cost value for Process orders

Hi Friends
From which table can we retrive the actual values relates to process orderwise, like actual material consumption cost, activites cost, overhead cost and other costs.

Hi
You would find the actual for process orders in Table COEP with Object Number = OP*. Also Check if you would require COSS, COSP for Controlling Tables and to get the Object numbers you need to used AFPO with Order type of Process order PI01...
Regards,
Suraj

Target cost /actual cost /variance issue

hi
target cost as per cost component structure is appearing after production order is saved
but after production order confirmation T Code CO15 actual cost is appear but target cost disappeared and because of this variance showing full value of actual cost
why this is happening
what is the reason
please suggest to resolve the issue
Regards
Dharmendrar

Dear,
Once you do the GR of that Prod Order and the status will DLV then the Target will show. Run KKS2 and then check your result.In production order or KKBC_HOE
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

CProjects Actual Cost = 0 after Settlement Run

Hi Gurus
After running Transaction CJ8G (Settlement Run), then I log into cProjects, locate my Project and go to the Accounting Tab, I click on Calculate, then Save, then I return to the cProjects Dashboard
When I look at the Actual Costs Value it is zero.
What do I need to do to prevent this from happening?
My overall process is.
Approve Time: CATS_APPR_LITE
Send Confirmed Time to cProjects     SE38 - (DPR_CATS_CPR_TRANSF)
Transfer Timesheet Data to Controlling     CAT7
Log in to cProjects
     Locate the Project in question and go into Accounting
     Click on Calculate & Save
     Click on Home          (Actual Costs > 0)
Generate Settlement Rules     CJB1
Execute Settlement Run     CJ8G
Log in to cProjects
     Locate the Project in question and go into Accounting
     Click on Calculate & Save
     Click on Home          (Actual Costs = 0)
Many Thanks in advance
Panduranga

Hi Panduranga,
The Badi OLR3_COSTS introduced with the note
1095514 enable you manipulate the costs showed in the dashboard. Please take a look the longtext of the note and implement (very simple) the codes.
Kind regards,
Zhenbo

How the target cost/ actual cost was done

Hi,
When we run the report KKBC_PKO for the material for the last period 10/2009.
system not showing the Target cost but it show the Actual cost values.
When we look the MB51 -Where production confirmation (backflush) and GI/GR happened for the particular period. It wa not happened.
If production confirmation was not done. how the Acutal cost is calculated.
What is basics to calculate the Target /Actual cost

Raj,
Without Confirmation / GI or GR, the actual cost cannot come. Why dont you check double click the cost records and see for yourself as from where the costs came.
Regards,
Prasobh

Planned cost correct in value category, problem in actual cost after GI

Hi,
I have maintained cost elements for value categories for material. The cost comes correctly under value category. After doing good issue of this material. The cost comes in maintenance order actual cost. But it does not appear under value category expected (it should fall in same value category as planned cost). Please suggest on this.
Regards,
Vijay

Hi,
The value category / cost elements combination is corret & this is the reason why the cost comes in proper value category in planned cost when the material is reserved.
But when the material is issued, it does not come in same value category under actual cost head.
I believe there are no different settings for planned cost & actual cost related to value category & cost element.
In my understanding, if the cost comes in planned cost then it should come in same value category in actual cost.
Please correct if I am wrong.
Thanks

Actual cost component values

Hi
We are facing an issue that actual cost component values in our system are not calculating correctly. We consider that there might be difference in our understanding regarding the calculation of actual cost component values.
Therefore I want to understand that how actual cost component values are calculated in SAP Material Ledger. I will appreciate if anyone can elaborate this with example and formula, used for calculation.
Regards

Hi Saad,
Please find below about the actual cost calculation in ML.
In ML single -level and multi-level material settlements are available. Multilevel price determination calculates the periodic unit price for a material. The standard price, the single-level differences cumulated in the period, the differences between planned and actual prices, as well as input material differences (multilevel differences) are all taken into account.
The material price calculated in multilevel price determination can be used for inventory valuation.
The actual price for each material can be updated to the material master for the closed period.
-During price determination, the system carries out the following calculation:
=>Daily Transaction
1) Purchasing XYZ Qty 20 Std : 10, Actual : 11
   Dr) Stock XYZ 200                   CR) GRIR 220
Purchase price differ XYZ 20
2) Purchasing ZYX Qty 20 Std : 20, Actual : 22
   DR) Stock ZYX 400                   CR) GRIR 440
Purchase price differ ZYX 40
3) Good issue XYZ Qty 15 Std : 10
   DR) Material cost XYZ 150               CR) Stock XYZ 150
4) Good issue ZYX Qty 15 Std : 20
   DR) Material cost ZYX 300               CR) Stock ZYX 300
5) Good receipt 234 Qty 15 Std : 40
DR) Stock 234 600                    CR) Clearing 600
6) Good delivery 234 Qty 10 Std : 40
   DR) Material cost 234 400         CR) Stock 234 400
7) Good receipt 123 Qty 10 Std : 50
    DR) Stock123 500                    CR) Clearing 500
8) Good issue 123 Qty 5 Std : 50
   DR) Material cost 123 250         CR) Stock 123 250
9) Good receipt ABC Qty 10 Std : 60
    DR) StockABC 600                    CR) Clearing 600
10) Sold ABC Qty 5 Std 60
    DR) COGS 300                          CR) Stock ABC 300
=> Monthly Material Ledger Closing
1) Single-level price determination
   DR) Stock XYZ 5 ( Current Stock 5 / Total Purchase Qty 20 * price difference 20)
   CR) Purchase price differ XYZ 20
*Transfer price difference to 234 15 ( Good issue qty 15 / Total Purchase Qty 20 * price difference 20)
    DR) Stock ZYX 10 ( Current Stock 5 / Total Purchase Qty 20 * price difference 40)
    CR) Purchase price differ ZYX 40
*Transfer price difference to 234 30 ( Good issue qty 15 / Total Purchase Qty 20 * price difference 40)
2) Multi-level price determination
    DR) Stock234 5 ( Current Stock 5 / Total Good receipt 15 * price difference 15)
    CR) Transfer price difference to 234 from XYZ 15
*Transfer price difference to 123 from 234 10 ( Good issue qty 10 / Total Good receipt 15
       * price difference 15)
    DR) Stock 234 10 ( Current Stock 5 / Total Good receipt 15 * price difference 30)
    CR) Transfer price difference to 234 from ZYX 30
*Transfer price difference to 123 from 234 20
        ( Good issue qty 10 / Total Good receipt 15 * price difference 30)
    DR) Stock 123 15 ( Current Stock 5 / Total Good receipt 10 * price difference 30)
    CR) Transfer price difference to 123 from 234 30
* Transfer price difference to ABC from 123 15
            ( Good issue qty 5 / Total Good receipt 10 * price difference 30)
    DR) Stock ABC 7.5 ( Current Stock 5 / Total Good receipt 10 * price difference 15)
    CR) Transfer price difference to ABC from 123 15
*Not allocated price difference 7.5
            ( Sold qty 5 / Total Good receipt 10 * price difference 15)
3) consumption revaluation
         DR) COGS ABC 7.5
         CR) Not allocated price difference 7.5
=> Current Actual Stock Amount
   1) XYZ Qty : 5 Actual Amount : 55 (actual price : 11)
   2) ZYX Qty : 5 Actual Amount : 110 (actual price : 22)
   3) 234 Qty : 5 Actual Amount : 215 (actual price : 43)
   4) 123 Qty : 5 Actual Amount : 265 (actual price : 53)
   5) ABC Qty : 5 Actual Amount : 307.5 (actual price : 61.5)
I hope you understand the process of actual cost cal in ML.
Regards,
chandu.

PM Order: Plan cost is Zero where as Actual cost is having value

Dear Experts,
I wanted to know why Plan cost is comming zero in the Maintenance order, where as Actual cost is having value.
Please guide me where it is going wroung
Regards

Dear PeteA/Manish,
I have assigned two components, and agaist which Reservation created since i had mentioned Stock item.
Then I have issued material against Reservation, then done TECO and processed for Settlement.
This what i have done, after seeing my settlement i have come to knwo that Plan cost was Zero.
Thanks for your suggestion.

Actual cost getting Duplicated while Invoice Verification

Can any one help. Iam attaching the link below
Re: Actual cost postings duplicated
Thanks

Hi
Your Freight condition should be an expense condition and it should not charge upon the inventory
If it is defined as such, then create an OSS message and ask SAP to investigate. Chekc if any note already exists
br Ajay M

Actual cost in the workplan task screen (hierarchy) not show value.

Hi all,
Could you advice me about actual cost if I want to show in the workplan task screen (hierarchy).
Thank you.

Well, then just check the master data setting in Query designer--> choose 0Costcenter and check the properties > choose advanced tab> under filter value Selection during Query Execution . check for these options
1.Only Posted Values for Navigation
2.Only values in Infoprovider
3.Values in Master data table
4.Characterstic Relationship.
You need to choose the 3rd opitions as you need to read the master tables for 0costcenter.
Hope it helps,
Cheers,
Balaji

WBS Element Actual Cost and 'Detailing the Value Type ' issue

Hello BW Experts ,
I want to extract the WBS Element Actual Cost and Revenue.
I have selected the data source 0CO_OM_WBS_6 .
In this data source there is a field Detailing the value type ' 0VTDETAIL.
As per SAP BI Help if the value of this field exists between 1 to 4 then it is actual cost of WBS ( also Key figure Category 0METYPE should be 1000 for actual cost and for revenue it is 1001).
value 4 of 0VTDETAIL means CO Activity Allocations.
When I see the data from this data source in RSA3 , I could not get any WBS whose 0VTDETAIL is 1 to 4 and Key Firgure Category as 1000, value type = 10.
Is there any other data source I should select in order to get actual cost for WBS ?
I can see the settelment cost whose 0VTDETAIL = 5 through this data source in RSA3.
But I want to see the data for the Actual Cost whose 0VTDETAIL = 4 .
What could be the reason ?
Thanks in advance .
Amol.

Dear Oscar,
Thanks for your response,
The Actual Cost posted by our Functional Consultant is USD 250, but i am getting the Total Actual cost is ZERO (Sum of -250 +250) as i shown above.
the posted actual cost is +250, finally we need this figure only,
if i do restriction on Sender receiver Indicater field with S than i will get Actual Cost 250, but in SAP standard RKF for Actual Cost there is no restriction on Sender receiver Indicater field (S & H)
I hope you got my point now.
Thanks
Amar Reddy

Actual Costing / Material Ledger - Component values transfer after movement

I executed a production order with several cost components, as Labor, Machine HS, after the settlement of the production order this cost where allocated into de CKM3N components. In addition to this, I executed movement 412 Q (Plant Stock to WBS Stock) for the material and the component values didnt pass to the material / PEP. I executed CKMLCP to Multilevel price determination. Can anyone help me with this?
The original material kept the cost split values, but the Material / Pep didnt. (the material code and plant didn't change)
Regards

Hi ,
Welcome to SDN ..
Its not a ML issue , but its a MM issue..
Movement 412Q is a transfer from plant stock to project stock. The material quantity gets reduced from plant stock and increased on project stock. The material value stays on the inventory account (so you won't see any actual costs associated with this transaction). ..
After you do a 412Q you can to a 221Q to issue the material from your project stock to the WBS. This will reduce the quantity in your project stock segment. The material value is credited to inventory and debited to material consumption expense(actual cost on the WBS).
The above applies to valuated project stock only. An issue to non-valuated project stock is treated like an inventory transfer from the logistics point of view(quantity is moved from plant stock to project stock) but like a consumption from a financial point of view(reduce inventory, increase expense).
Since, your Project Stock is not consumed.. CKM3N is not reflecting any consumption. Please use the movement type 221Q and i am sure your issue will be solved..
Please revert back for any further clarifications
Regards
Sarada

Excise duty value on sales invoice not reflecting in the actual cost

Hi,
we are paying excise duty, when we are removing material from plant for the particular project. Now excise duty paid is reflecting properly in the actual cost colunn of the the report s_alr_87013558. Secondly when we are rasing commercial invoice to the customer & excise duty paid earlier is recovered from the customer, now excise duty recovered from the customer is not being reduced from the actual cost.
Cost elment for excise duty paid - 6101100, with category 1 - primary cos/ cost reducing revenue.
Cost elment for excise duty recovered - 3801090, with category 11 - Revenue.
Kindly guide how to update(reduced) excise duty revocvered in the acutal cost.
regards
Sanjay

Hi Mohan,
Please use the formatting options to format ur question...!!
Thanks,
Tatvagna.

Price differenc value in Actual cost of Production

Hi,
We are creating a production order for Billets that is our Semifinished goods. The material master is maintained at Std price.
Lets say that Std prce of the Billet is 100.
Lets say that after the production order is completed , the actual cost of Billet is comes out to be 125.
Now this billet is used for the production of the finished goods Wires. For the production order of wires, the price of the billet is taken as 100.
In this way the actual cost of the Wire will not come.
May be this is the standrad process. Let me know in any way can we use price difference of 125-100= 25 in the production cost of wires so that I can get the actual cost of the wire.
We are not using Material Ledger.
Any suggestion
regards

Thanks Ajay,
Even using ML we cannot get the actual price before the end of the period. And at the month end only we can valuate the inventory withe actual cost. I hope I am right till now.
Pl correct if I am wrong.
But in this case some wires rods are already out from the inventory for the sale that was valuated with the Std Price of the Billet.
Hence these invenories will not be available at the month end for the revaluation.
Pl. correct If my thought is OK.
ML can only be used where ther is lots of Raw Matl price variation..Hence I think I should go with the std price valuation itself.
regards
Kamlesh

Actual cost value appears duplicated

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for