Actual Costing - Multi Level

Hi,
Request the team to revert , to perform the variance (Price & Usage) allocation to the multi level cost roll up from the inter-mediate stage to the Finished Goods stage, need to know the method to perform the same.
Thanx
Ganesh

Hi,
The variances can be transferred to COPA /PCA.The variances should not be carried forward to the finished goods.[ you should not manually post the variances to the finished goods a/c].
If you use COPA,you should use a transfer structure [ PA structure] to settle the variances-this structure can be maintained in order type etc.in the M/data.
If you assign all the org-units to PCA,the variances can be got from the reports.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Ramesh

Similar Messages

DIFFERENCE BETWEEN SINGLE LEVEL AND MULTI LEVEL COSTING

Sir,'
Please explain the difference between Single Level and Multi Level Costing in Detail
thanking You

While using material ledger, we can use the single level or multi-level price determination for valuation of inventory.
Procurement processes are used in Product Cost Controlling to determine procurement costs and to present those costs. Purchase Order, for example, is single-level procurement and Production is multilevel procurement.
Single-level material price determination calculates the periodic unit price for a material. The standard price and the cumulative single-level differences of the period are taken into account. Single-level material price determination takes into account the differences that arise directly when a material is procured.
Multilevel price determination calculates the periodic unit price for a material. The standard price, the single-level differences cumulated in the period, the differences between planned and actual prices, as well as input material differences (multilevel differences) are all taken into account.
Single-level material price determination is a prerequisite for Multi-level price determination.

Posting Actual Costs at Material Level

Hi All
For our standard costs we will have BOM Components, Activities from Routings and additive costs. We also have activated Material Ledger and will use it for Actual Costing, the objective being that each and every actual cost will be brought to the SKU level. For BOM components and activities that is no problem since it will be done through settlement.
However for cost components that have additive costs how do we settle them to the material ledger? Do we need to do MR22 for difference between standard and actual? Is there a way to do this through a template allocation or some other allocation method?
Thank you

Hi
Lets assume, you have Std cost of 100 USD involving Material + Labor and an additive cost of 10 USD entered manually from CK74N...
During production order processing - You would issue material components and confirm Labor hrs... Say, this amounts to 120 USD as against the std cost of 100 USD...
However, in prod orders, there will be nothing posted against the additive std cost of 10 USD... If you wish, you need to post it either through template allocation from some cost centers or use some assessment cycle or transfer manually from KB11N or use a costing sheet
Regards
Ajay M

Sales order costing - tracking of actual costs at sales order item level

Hi
We are going with sales order costing for services
Service material is non-valuated hence the scenario is non-valuated sales order stock
PP module is not implemented.
I am having following questions
1. How to track the actual costs at sales order item level? Is Internal order/CO production order is required to be created for the same?
2. Can I do activity confirmations directly from cost center to sales order item.
3. Can Raw material is issued directly against sales order item.
4. Is Sales order is a real or statistical account assignment object?

dear friend,
please look here:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/EN/42/d7248ab27111d19e9a080009b0db33/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/EN/90/ba6cfb446711d189420000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
reagrds,

Total up of Actual cost to Upper level

Hi All ,
I have WBS structure with 4 to 5 level . Now I want sum of Actual cost from forth level to first level of GR value + Goods Issue value (from table QBWE -SALK3 & MSEG-
BWART(281 ) & value from DMBRT ) to Level 1 WBS like standard report . I check in many table but no tables give such total value .
Thanks ,
Virendra

Hi,
Well I think, you can't get that level wise WBS actual data in a table or report. You have to filter.
As Amit suggest, CJI3 have the required info as you want. And as I understood, you want to sum-up cost only to some WBS levels. Right..You can manually select your WBS range using multiple selection criteria in CJI3 selection screen from 1 to 4 level and then sum-up there.
Regards
Shishir

Planned and Actual costs at the Activity level

Hi all,
Can you tell me if there is a R/3 report which lists out the planned and actual costs for a project and displays it for each network and activity? I want these values at the activity level.
I found a report which lists out these values for each network, but I cannot drilldown to the activity level. Please help.
Thanks,
Satyajit.

Hi,
There is setting in network type. Please go through transaction OPUV i.e.
Change view- Network type paramaeters : overview " Overview.
Uner Network type parameters there is one radio button in front of ActvtyAcctAssgn. Just activate it.
Hope this helps.
Regards
Tushar

Product Costing - Standard Cost Component Split on Multi Level BOM's

Hi,
We are the process of introducing SAP for all back office and manufacturing activities.
I am currently trying to verify that the product cost calculation for Multi-Level BOMs in our Legacy system matches the cost roll up or cost estimate in SAP at not only a Total Cost Level but the cost component split must be accurate also. So far, all the costs roll up correctly at a total cost level but I have noticed one issue:
When I run a cost estimate for a single level BOM the cost estimate will split the components accurately into Material, Labor, Fixed Overhead and Variable overhead, However, when this component is then used in the next level of manufacturing all the Labor, Fixed Overhead and Variable Overhead Cost is grouped under Material.
Q1.) Is there a SAP setting or config change that will keep the previous Labor, Fixed OH and Variable OH cost in these categories as the material is rolled up to finished product level?
Q2.) Is there a standard report / view where I can see the Finished Goods Standard Cost split by each of there rolled up Components? This would need to split the Total Material, Total Labor, Total Fixed OH and Total VO required to make the Finished Product.
Q3.) Is there a standard report / view where I can see the added value (Absorption) by component split (Labor, Fixed OH, Variable OH) for every Manufactured Part?
Any help you can provide would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks & Regards,
Brian

Actuall I just tried again and it did ask for me S number and I put it in and I did not have "authorization" to access
Error Message - Access denied (R/3)
What happened?
You do not have permission to access this Object
What can you do?
Please contact a consulting adminstrative
Error code: WEBSMP106-20080214172231-0015
Error details: 2491DD9-702/1A053/3162-71A9CFA5-3CB9265-2992F9
Service Name: SAPIDB
Service Server: WEBSMP106
Process-ID: 4640
Thread-ID: 6020
Sorry for any inconvenience.
Your SAP Service Marketplace Team

Distributing Actual Costs to the Product Level

We are using Material Ledger at my client and we have some things such as Freight, Depreciation etc. being added to the standard cost as an additive cost. For the actual values for these is it possible to include this in the ML actual cost without having to go through MR22?
Thank you

Hello,
I think you need to rethink the scenario. Freight should have been added to the material cost at the time of procurement and depreciation should flow from cost centers. Another alternate can be that you post actual freight and depreciation both in cost centers , define activity for them , plan them as well and use formula based planning templates to allocate so that they are build up in the cost estimate as well and in actuals they are actualised through the cost center route.
Kind Regards // Shaubhik

Actual Cost of Product with Price control "S"

Dear Gurus,
Is there any report available where we can know the Actual Costs of Materials with Price Control "S".
In the material master field the actual cost in the "Moving Price Tab" of the material with Price Control "S" is available, but is there any report available for plant level?
Thanks & Regards,
Amit Dhanurdhari.

Hi Amit,
-- Under Standard Costing, you value your inventory at Standard Costs and any variances in Production Process will be settled to Price Difference Account. You will not be able to find out actual cost per unit. In Multi-level BOM scenario under Standard Costing (CO-PC), variances don't get rolled-up to the next level, only costs get rolled-up.
-- Under Actual Costing - Material Ledger, You will be able to find out the Actual Cost per Unit. Variances get rolled-up to the next level.
To explain difference between Standard Costing in CO-PC and Material Ledger briefly....
You have given Price Indicator as "S" in the material master of "X" material (semi finisher or finished) and you are doing Standard Cost Estimate for arriving at Standard Cost per tonne. Let's say, the Standard Cost per tonne is Rs.1000/-
Now, when you created production order for 10 tonnes and received output of 10 tonnes (GR). But the total cost incurred on that production order is Rs.1100/-. In this situation, actual cost per tonne is Rs.110.
But, because you are following Standard Costing, When you post GR against this Production Order, inventory will be posted at Standard cost only, i.e., Rs.1000/-. and the balance of Rs.100 will be posted to Price Difference Account. (and parallally the variance of Rs.100/-) will flow to COPA.
So, it is clear that, though, at Production Order level you can see the actual cost, at "material" level, you will not be able to see the actual cost per tonne.(as long as you are using only Product Costing and Standard Costing)
Alternatively, if you maintain Price Indicator as "V", you will able to get the Actual Cost per tonne at material level, but there will be no scope for establishing standard cost and comparison with actual thereof.
But, the same is possible if you are using Material Ledger (CO-ML). If Material Ledger is active, you will be maintaining "S" in the material master, still, the variances will be settled inventory and you will be able to get the actual cost per tonne. (bothe Standard cost estimate, actual cost per tonne will be possible).
Pls revert back for further explanation
Srikanth Munnaluri

Actual cost component values

Hi
We are facing an issue that actual cost component values in our system are not calculating correctly. We consider that there might be difference in our understanding regarding the calculation of actual cost component values.
Therefore I want to understand that how actual cost component values are calculated in SAP Material Ledger. I will appreciate if anyone can elaborate this with example and formula, used for calculation.
Regards

Hi Saad,
Please find below about the actual cost calculation in ML.
In ML single -level and multi-level material settlements are available. Multilevel price determination calculates the periodic unit price for a material. The standard price, the single-level differences cumulated in the period, the differences between planned and actual prices, as well as input material differences (multilevel differences) are all taken into account.
The material price calculated in multilevel price determination can be used for inventory valuation.
The actual price for each material can be updated to the material master for the closed period.
-During price determination, the system carries out the following calculation:
=>Daily Transaction
1) Purchasing XYZ Qty 20 Std : 10, Actual : 11
   Dr) Stock XYZ 200                   CR) GRIR 220
Purchase price differ XYZ 20
2) Purchasing ZYX Qty 20 Std : 20, Actual : 22
   DR) Stock ZYX 400                   CR) GRIR 440
Purchase price differ ZYX 40
3) Good issue XYZ Qty 15 Std : 10
   DR) Material cost XYZ 150               CR) Stock XYZ 150
4) Good issue ZYX Qty 15 Std : 20
   DR) Material cost ZYX 300               CR) Stock ZYX 300
5) Good receipt 234 Qty 15 Std : 40
DR) Stock 234 600                    CR) Clearing 600
6) Good delivery 234 Qty 10 Std : 40
   DR) Material cost 234 400         CR) Stock 234 400
7) Good receipt 123 Qty 10 Std : 50
    DR) Stock123 500                    CR) Clearing 500
8) Good issue 123 Qty 5 Std : 50
   DR) Material cost 123 250         CR) Stock 123 250
9) Good receipt ABC Qty 10 Std : 60
    DR) StockABC 600                    CR) Clearing 600
10) Sold ABC Qty 5 Std 60
    DR) COGS 300                          CR) Stock ABC 300
=> Monthly Material Ledger Closing
1) Single-level price determination
   DR) Stock XYZ 5 ( Current Stock 5 / Total Purchase Qty 20 * price difference 20)
   CR) Purchase price differ XYZ 20
*Transfer price difference to 234 15 ( Good issue qty 15 / Total Purchase Qty 20 * price difference 20)
    DR) Stock ZYX 10 ( Current Stock 5 / Total Purchase Qty 20 * price difference 40)
    CR) Purchase price differ ZYX 40
*Transfer price difference to 234 30 ( Good issue qty 15 / Total Purchase Qty 20 * price difference 40)
2) Multi-level price determination
    DR) Stock234 5 ( Current Stock 5 / Total Good receipt 15 * price difference 15)
    CR) Transfer price difference to 234 from XYZ 15
*Transfer price difference to 123 from 234 10 ( Good issue qty 10 / Total Good receipt 15
       * price difference 15)
    DR) Stock 234 10 ( Current Stock 5 / Total Good receipt 15 * price difference 30)
    CR) Transfer price difference to 234 from ZYX 30
*Transfer price difference to 123 from 234 20
        ( Good issue qty 10 / Total Good receipt 15 * price difference 30)
    DR) Stock 123 15 ( Current Stock 5 / Total Good receipt 10 * price difference 30)
    CR) Transfer price difference to 123 from 234 30
* Transfer price difference to ABC from 123 15
            ( Good issue qty 5 / Total Good receipt 10 * price difference 30)
    DR) Stock ABC 7.5 ( Current Stock 5 / Total Good receipt 10 * price difference 15)
    CR) Transfer price difference to ABC from 123 15
*Not allocated price difference 7.5
            ( Sold qty 5 / Total Good receipt 10 * price difference 15)
3) consumption revaluation
         DR) COGS ABC 7.5
         CR) Not allocated price difference 7.5
=> Current Actual Stock Amount
   1) XYZ Qty : 5 Actual Amount : 55 (actual price : 11)
   2) ZYX Qty : 5 Actual Amount : 110 (actual price : 22)
   3) 234 Qty : 5 Actual Amount : 215 (actual price : 43)
   4) 123 Qty : 5 Actual Amount : 265 (actual price : 53)
   5) ABC Qty : 5 Actual Amount : 307.5 (actual price : 61.5)
I hope you understand the process of actual cost cal in ML.
Regards,
chandu.

How to analyse actual cost for each operation in Process/Production Order?

Hi all,
IN SAP, I know that we can analyze plan cost for Operation in Process Order/ Production Order.
However, I can not analyze Actual cost for Operation .
I know the object when I good issue material is ORDER, not OPERATION.
But, as requirement of users, they want to analyze actual cost for each Operation.
CAn SAP do this analyze?
If Yes, What should I do in SAP to have this reports?
THanks in advance,
Emily Nguyen

Hi Emily,
as I see from one other message that you're using material ledger. Then your expectation is apparently to also see the actual costs of materials in your production order by operation.
This is not supported. Actual material costs are handed up in material ledger multi-level settlement from one material to the next, bypassing the production orders.
That means the production order will always contain the material costs valuated at plan price, not at actual price.
For activity prices that might be better, when you revalue the orders at actual activity prices with CON2. But even there I am not sure that it will always be assigned correctly to the operations.
There is currently an enhancement in development, the operation level costing. But that will affect more the planned cost side not the actuals. Might be interesting to learn more about your requirements and the use case behind.
best regards,
Udo

What is the actual cost of SAP original Software?

hi experts
<b>What is the actual cost of SAP original Software to implement in one software company.</b>
thanks in advnace

Between $1 and $100,000,000.
Lots of variables... yearly licensing fees or full purchase, R/3 or complete NetWeaver suite, single user or multi-user, several levels of support or no support, implementation partner expenses, types of hardware, etc....
EDIT:
I just noticed you said "one software company". There are other options if you want to be a "partner". It is one thing to use the software to run your company, it is another if you want the software because your company wants to develop add-ons.
Message was edited by: Norman Salter

Actual Cost Component Split Datasource

Hello all,
Did anyone work with 0CO_PC_ACT_10.
I am using 0CO_PC_ACT_10 datasource to feed Infocube 0COPC_C07, we have loaded data period wise and based on actual costing run and we are validating data with ECC using CKM3.
My aim is to get for category ending inventory (EB). Single level price differences and quantity is matching with CKM3 values but multi level price differences are not matching.
I have tried searching in SDN and related sap notes but couldnu2019t find anything appropriate.
Kindly assist and please let me know if you need anything more.
Thanks,
Rakesh

Hi Rakesh ,
The datasource 0CO_PC_ACT_10 uses the extractor - KKBW_CCS_BW_GET_DATA to extract its data .
And in the extractor - KKBW_CCS_BW_GET_DATA,
i could locate these tables - ckmlhd and ckmlmv011 .
So you can check these tables for your information .
You can also have a look at this :
[http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/02/a2e338d96cd84fe10000000a11405a/frameset.htm]
Thanks ,
Lokesh

Report for bom wise target and actual cost as well as qty at line item

Dear Experts,
Is there any standard tcode for bom wise target and actual cost as well as qty at line item level for the month.
there is one tcode s_alr_87013127 but user has to double click in order to get line item details.
I want to see line item wise breakup/bom wise target and cost cost as well as qty.
Thanks in advance.
regards
RK

Dear experts,
I am still looking for a revert.
regards
RK

Infoset query of vendor payments at the cost distribution level

We would like an infoset query of vendor payments at the cost distribution level of the document. The issue seems to be joining vendor to the document cost distribution lines.
1.) BSAK + BSIK can be combined with an infoset data structure but only contain the vendor line of a document; the cost distribution lines are not in the tables.
2.) BSIS + BSAS can be combined with an infoset data structure but lack vendor data and joins (to a vendor source) are not an option with data structures. Vendor data added with an additional field is too slow to be a primary selection field.
3.) Logical data base KDF in an infoset returns only the vendor line of a document, not the cost distribution lines.
4.) Logical data base BRM in an infoset can have vendor from BSAK/BSIK attached by an additional field but performance is too slow to be useful. Joins are not an option in a logical data base infoset.
5.) Complete data is lacking when table joins between document cost distribution tables and vendor data tables are possible, (SPL actual line item table & BSIP or FMIFIIT & FMIFIHD). BSIP lacks AB documents (reversals). FM tables lack general ledger only documents.
6.) BSAK and BSIK together have complete vendor data but joins of both to a basis table do not work well. Left outer joins are too slow, inner joins won’t work since the tables have mutually exclusive data.
It would be ideal to have vendor in BKPF, like FMIFIHD has, but it isn't a field.
Does anyone know of any other options? I have seen the helpful thread on How to Read BSEG Efficiently

Hi,
This is SAP Business one reporting and printing forum. Please find correct forum and repost above discussion to get quick response.
Please close this thread here with helpful answer.
Thanks & Regards,
Nagarajan

Actual Costing - Multi Level

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for