Actual settlement: Production/Process Orders

Hi Gurus,
am doing production order through CO88 for fiscal year 2008 period of April. at that time am getting the following error.
Account determination for entry CFCL PRD 0001 PRF 3101 not possible
i know the solution for that.
but when i was done for fiscal year 2007 i did not get this error now only am getting. i run 12 periods for fiscal year 2007 at that time i did not get.
So please let me know the reason for the error. We need to do any thing for year end or 2007 for the production orders.
Its very urgent.
Thanks in advance for the reply.
Regards
Vijay

hi,
you have to done the integration for PRF in OBYC
sateesh

Similar Messages

Settlement of Process order aginst the Sale Order

Dear friends
This the scenario with respect to product cost by sale order settlement profile. When I am settling the process order, which is created with reference to Sale order, system throwing an error "Define a settlement cost element for receiver type SDI".
When I see the explanation given by system, the following message displayed :
"Diagnosis
In allocation structure Z1 (controlling area RI01), you did not define which cost element should be used when settling costs/revenues of the sender. Nor did you define receiver type SDI.
Procedure
Assign a different allocation structure to the settlement sender (-> Master data -> Settlement rule -> Goto -> Settlement parameters), or maintain allocation structure Z1.""
For this I have defined one Secondary cost element and assigned to Allocation Structure under Settlement cost elements.
Still I am getting the error. What could be the reason?
Please do the needful.

Hi Kiran
In the Allocation Structure Z1, you need to define the Settlement cost element for the receiver category SDI. Have you done that? Cost element should be created with 21 Cost element category.
Dont Select By Cost element.
Regards,
Suraj

Settlement of process order

In PP-PI We want to use active ingredient for scenario:
Our Raw material is MINING ORE which will have varying proportion of COPPER & COBALT.
Valuation of ORE is based on itu2019s content of COPPER & COBALT content. So we will use active ingredient to capture value of this raw material based on it content of CU & CO.
Now when we issue this material for production to process order, our semi finished output ( Say SFG1) will also have varying content of COPPER & COBALT based on kind of input quality. There will several process orders doing diff. processe.
Now my query is
1)     Can we settle the process order variance to COPPER & COBALT content of SFG1 instead of normal settlement to SFG1?
2)     Can I maintain my valuation of SFG1 based on COPPER & COBALT content?
3)     Do we have any user exit or BADI available to replace SFG1 with CO& CU in process order settlement rule?
4)     In standard cost estimate can we capture COPPER & COBALT characteristics?
Ultimately COPPER & COBALT are our finished goods.
I try to search sap help but not much info to help me on this.
Your input will be highly appreciated.
Nitesh

Hi,
The concept explained is typically a co-product scenario:
Ore produces SEMI COPPER and SEMI COBALT. SEMI COPPER and SEMI COBALT produce FIN COPPER and FIN COBALT.
This scenario is covered under u2018CO-PROUDUCTu2019 concept. Here Ore is Raw Material, SEMI COPPER and SEMI COBALT are SEMI-PRODUCT and finally COPPER and COBALT are Finished Product.
Now estimate the standard cost for your SEMI-PRODUCTS and FINISHED PRODUCTS using integrated BOM. Sit with your PP Consultant who can give you good input for costing the products whether based on quanity yield or quality yield.
Once this is tested and found the results are expected, the solution can be freezed.
Please let me know your feed back.
Regards,
Ashok

Settlement of process order in G/L account

Dear Guru
In our client scenario for FG we are using "V" as price control. During settlement of process order the variance amount is hitting in the "stock of fg produce" + and "cogm" - ve entry.
but our client need the variance (balance) of order to be hit in separate G/L account in steed of cost of goods manuf.
In OBYC for transaction "GBB" in which general modification we need to assign the req g/l account.
if i am wrong pl give me some solution to solve the above requirement.
i know that if price control "s" is used it will hit price diff account.
if any other details required pl reply.
regards
vinoth
Edited by: vinoth on Jul 15, 2010 11:59 AM

Check GBB/AUA. If GBB/AUA is not maintained, then it will use GBB/AUF.
Edited by: ayethebing on Jul 15, 2010 6:34 PM
Edited by: ayethebing on Jul 15, 2010 6:36 PM

Modifications on Production Process Order

HI Experts:
How can I check all the modifications involved on a production process orders? as a log of the system? similar to MM03 or others transactions???
Thanks
Diego

Diego,
This is something SAP lacks, the possible changes you can track is for the System Status, and if OCM was Implemented few more changes can be tracked.
Regards,
Prasobh

Using Component scrap differently in MRP and in production/process orders

Hello Gurus,
We use Component scrap in our BOMs.
MRP calculates the requirements including the scrap and that is fine. Is there a way that when we create production/process orders the components' required quantity will not include the scrap automatically? We don't want the components to be issued with the additional scrap, but rather issue the scrap by request only if required.
Thanks

Not possible.
The SAP logic is tht procurement of RM and Production & consumption has to be in line. Functionally tht is ideal

Actual Template Allocation - Process Order Handling

Hi all
Could somebody give me some input to an issue I am facing.
I am working on a best practice baseline for Chemicals and have setup a Template to allocate overheads to materials. The allocation is fixed no matter the lot size of the process order.
At month end when running the closing process I use the transaction CPTD to allocate the actual template overhead to each process order.
However this transaction picks up and re-allocates overhead to process orders already confirmed, delivered and settled.
This is of course not what I expected as these orders have been fully completed, so I am thinking that I am missing step in closing down the process orders correctly.
Is there a status on the process order that will cause that order to be excluded from the CPTD, or am I missing some configuration?
Thank you in advance
/Thorben Hald
2C change A/S
Denmark

Hi
I am using environment 9 yes.
My formula is very simple:
On Object I have:
SenderCostCenter = '130570' AND
SenderActivityType = 'LABORA'
And then I have simply put "1" in Plan Quantity and Actual Quantity.
So what it does is it allocates the unit cost of the combination of cost center 130570 and act. type LABORA one time to each material/order no matter lot size.
Should I perhaps have put "1" into the Plan Fix and Actual Fix instead?
Thanks

Actual Hours on Process Orders

I am evaluating different technologies to collect and enter actual working hours of operations staff into SAP process orders. Does anyone have an ideas or solutions to accuratly collect and transfer the information? I am looking for some automation into the collections and data transferring process.

Hi
Have you considered looking at the partners under Human Resources in the SAP store. I looked under HR and time collection and I found the following
B-COMM ERP 4 SAP ERP - from Kaba Work Force Management Kaba - Workforce Management, Time and Attendance, Access Control
Unfortunately I do not have any direct experience with this product, but during my searches it comes up many times. So I feel that it would be a good place to start.
Regards
John

Std Costing and Actual costing at process Order

Hello Friends,
Followings are the client requirements, Please give me your ideas :-
1 . Costing variant is same for all three - costing run, process order (plan and actual), means there is no prices variance on process order level. ( material at std price, Activity plan price, overhead fix%)
2. Alongwith this above client also need to capture actual result (material at MAP, activity at monthly actual price, overhead fix %)
In this case there is price and usage variance can see.
Now as I think that both scenarios are not possible on process order level. According to me we can do by a customize actual costing cockpit.
Need your openion that do we have any option thru standard funcations of sap to get this requirement. If you need any other explanation , please do let me know.
Thanks
Ravi

Thanks friends. I have done.

Settling the Process Order to a Sales document Item

Hi all,
I have a unique scenario.. I want a forecatsed Service material (Treating it as MTS Material) to be settled against a Sales Document Item (SDI). (It is like a combination of MTS and MTO).
We have maintained a ne w Order Type with a new settlement rule. Every time I create a process Order, I want to enter the settlement rule on the overview screen. I get the following error.
"Settlement account assignment" not allowed (Sys. status NoMP, object VB0000000236000010)".
Does any of you have faced similar issue?
Is there a solution for this?
Thanks in Adavance..

Nanjund:
the key here seems to be the strategy for the material.
According to your requirement, the alternative could be strategy 50.
Process:
- sales plan for the material
- planning for the material will create Unconvertible planned orders (this allows the planning of raw materials )
- enter the sales order
- planning under these conditions will reduce PIR and create a "normal" planned order
- Convert to process order
- settlement will be directed to the sales order.
Regards

Why settlement is needed after confirming production/Process orders?

Hi,
PP Gurus.
After cnfming any Prod.order what is the convention of giving TECO status to complete the order. why it needs to settle errors in COGI, why we have to do settlement of prod. Order.?
Pls guide me.......
yogesh thorat......

Dear,
If TECO is done..we can not post any planned goos issue to order, practically we are annoucing that it can be settled. Hence if TECO partically it is finished from Production side, hence to be proceed on overhead calculation, variance calculation, settlement.
In COGI, we have error goods movements for that order, hence production people are expcted to finish all the component issue and GR, so that we can announce finance that we are completed.
Why settlement required?
Let us say the std cost of product is 10 USD. But after the production the actual cost of production is say 12 USD. It will remain in the production order. Now this has to be booked again either the product or against a variuance cost centre, so that from the variance cost centre we can book it to different cost centres.
Hence during the settlement if the material price control is V, then the difference cost i.e. in our example 2USD will be chared to material GL a/c during settlement.
If the price control is S, then the difference cost of 2/USD will be charged to variance GL a/c which is assigned to a variance cost center. This variance cost centre is zeroed out depending on the business rule.
Hence at the end of settlement, the production order net value is ZERO.
please come back if you need help.

MD4C - Multilevel order report with a selection of production/process order

Hi Experts,
We have this request:
We need to check the availability check for different production orders, with multilevel mode, but the tcode MD4C accepts only one production order.
We have seen that we can actually use the same tcode with different sales orders.
Someone tell me if it is possible to change the screen on production orders or tell me which FM can be used in a Z report ?
Thanks in advance
Marco Ferrari

Dear Macro ,
Are you really particular on MD4C ?
I would rarher say there are good report in SAP standard , available to fullfill your requirement .Why do not you try the blelow report for your requrement :
1.COOIS
2.COHV
3.CO46
In COOIS -Choose Order Header and Select Collective availability check -Enter Order Type and Plant and hit execute button .
It will give you the result what you are looking for and also goto Header after execution -Select colourful chekcer box "Select Lay out " Change as you wish too with your required field information in display column
Hope this will be helpful
Try and revert
Regards
JH

Multiple materials in a production process order.

Is there a way to create one single process / production order for multiple materials?
Will material group help? or something similar to a Purchase Order with multiple line items?
Help is appreciated.

Hi,
Go for joint production, your problem will be solved
Maintain as coproduct for both the material.
Create Prod order on any single material.
Joint production will be in MRP2 & Costing 1
Give proper apportionment structure for both the products.
Customize in OKLE.
Subbu.
Edited by: Subbu SP on Nov 12, 2010 5:05 AM

Actual settlement for PM order

Dear all,
While running settlement using KO88 for a PM order, I am getting the following error:
"Define a settlement cost element for receiver type CTR".
Diagnosis
In allocation structure A1 (controlling area BP01), you did not define which cost element should be used when settling costs/revenues of the sender. Nor did you define receiver type CTR.
Procedure
Assign a different allocation structure to the settlement sender (-> Master data -> Settlement rule -> Goto -> Settlement parameters), or maintain allocation structure A1.
In A1 stucture, I have given a secondary cost element with the cost category 21.
Please suggest me how to solve this issue.
Regards,
AR

Dear,
Message no is KD506?
Project System>Costs>Automatic and Periodic Allocations>Settlement>Settlement Profile
1. Create Allocation Structure (Source cost elements/groups are assiged to settlement cost elements -by cost element or by settlement cost element to receiver categories like.,CTR)
2. Create Settlement Profile (Valid receivers like CTR and allocation structure etc., are mentioned here)
Also
3. Create Source Structure
4. Define PA Transfer Structures
You the refer the settlement profile in the project profile and maintain the settlement rules on the WBS.
For more information on settlement refer below link on help portal
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/6b/566b34b650f777e10000009b38f83b/frameset.htm
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Transaction COIF- Production & Process orders with Production Notes

Dear All,
Can anyone please explain the significance of transaction COIF.How to create production memos & how is it useful?

This report list outs orders for which production memos are maintained, in long text for production order ther will be a section for production memo if text is maintained in this section then system will list this production order when COIF is executed.
In production memo certain instructions can be entered which needs to be passed to shop floor, COIF helps to identify such orders where instructions are entered.
in the co02 or COR2 thjrough menu you can check header--->production memo , it will be active if test is maintained in long text under section for production memo.
hope this will help
rgds
Anand

Actual settlement: Production/Process Orders

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for