Additional filter criteria in F110

Hi All,
I understand that there is an additional filter criteria in transaction F110 but is it only to filter specific criteria?
For example, i want to use the allocation field as a filter criteria. I have many documents which are automatically posted to the system with the same leading characters - i.e ABC123, ABC445, ABC918.
In F110, is there a way to ONLY select items with allocation field starting with ABC?
Any help is much appreciated.
Thank you in advance.

Dear,
In selection go to document level fields and select Assignment (ZUONR)
Put ABC* and then try if it works...
Regards,
Chintan Joshi

Similar Messages

  • Additional selection criteria for RHECM_CREATE_COMP_PROCESS (create compens

    Dear All,
    There is a requirement to add additional selection criteria for  RHECM_CREATE_COMP_PROCESS.
    Compensation Plan needs to take several optiions rather than a single option.
    Incentive Plan Type to be added as additional selection criteria
    Do we need to copy the standard program and then modify it or there can be some other way out for it.
    Thanks and Regards
    Shraddha

    have checked out the SDN forums quite throughly and have come up with a couple of questions/solutions.
    1) Copy the program into Z-name space and add in the code
    Question: Where to specifically add the code, the program is huge with multiple enhancement points being seen in the code.
    Can someone please guide me where I can change the displayed records, point where iI can append data or change the internal table being sent for ALV display.
    <b>---> U have to find out , where /how  they defined Selection screeen , final output they are displaying.</b>
    2) Make changes in SPRO>Define field selection for material document list.
    Question: The required field is not present within the listing, It does give the option to make new entries, but I have to specify a program/table and field.
    If I create my own program to get the details and display onto an ALV Grid, will the program be called when I make selections on that requisitioner field?
    <b>---> lot of work to do</b>
    3) This is text copied from a thread, I have lost the link to it.
    Create a Z report that is a copy of the selection include of the standard selection screen include with the additional selection criteria.
    - Export the extra selection criteria value to shared memory.
    - Submit the standard VL10G program with the selection sets.
    - In user exit (depends on which field needs to be checked), import the extra selection criteria value back in and filter the selected data set.
    Could someone please guide me if it is possible to do the above within RM07DOCS, and a little more detail on how to go about it?.
    <b>Better Options --->try to get the logic of MB51 , then do changes which are required.
    most of data , u will get it from MSEGMKPFMARA+MBEW.</b>
    revert back in case of any other issues.
    Regards
    Prabhu

  • Filter criteria in ALV report not working

    Hi,
    In ALV report , when i click on filter button , it does not filter the report according to the filtered criteria. this happens in the cases where the selection criteria is a lengthy field. when i debug after the filter criteria it goes into standard function.
    i am using REUSE_ALV_GRID_DISPLAY
    is there any way in which i can correct this?
    thanks,
    Amit
    null

    chk this useful thread
    Re: ALV problem (with filter use)

  • Adding "Filter Criteria" to the XSLT List View Web Part impact on "Export to Excel" functionality within Document Library

    Hi there,
    XSLT List View displaying all the list items within the Document Library. In order to implement the Search functionality within Document library out of box "Text Filter" web part is configured as explained below. The solution is similar to
    the one suggested at
    http://www.wonderlaura.com/Lists/Posts/Post.aspx?ID=77
    "Text Filter" Web Part added to the page.
    Filter Criteria (i.e., XSLT List View columns) added to the XSLT List View where the filter parameters take the input from the "Text Filter" Web Part .
      3. Both Web Parts (XSLT List View and the Text Filter) are connected.
    When the search criteria is entered into the "Text Filter" Web Part, it is passed to the relevant Columns of the XSLT List View and the documents (List Items) that match the search criteria are shown within XSLT List View.
    Search functionality working as expected.
    Query: Selecting the "Export to Excel" icon from the ribbon generates the excel spread sheet with no data except Column Titles from the Document library. In the investigation it is
    found that adding the 'Filter Criteria' on XSLT List View is causing this bug. When the Filter Criteria is removed, then "Export to Excel" functionality is working as expected.
    But it is mandatory to add "Filter Criteria" to implement the search functionality with in the document library.
    Help: Help/input appreciated on the work around to get the "Export to Excel" functionality work when the "Filter Criteria"
    exist on the XSLT List View.
    Regards,

    Once again thanks very much for your help Scott. very much appreciated.
    In the investigation it is found that removing the 'Filter Criteria' on XSLT List View makes the "Export to Excel" functionality work. But the 'Filter Criteria' is mandatory to get the 'Document Search' functionality.
    I think that due to technical limitations it should be concluded that 'only custom development can make all work, no code solutions using the SharePoint Designer can meet all the requirements.
    If you can think of any alternative solution that could help in resolving the current issue or fix the issue without any custom implementation please inform. Otherwise this issue would be marked as resolved with your suggested response.
    Regards,

  • CRM 7.0 = ECC 6.0 Upload: Filter criteria for BUPA_MAIN

    Dear Experts,
    concerning filtering of BUPA_MAIN in CRM 7.0 => ECC 6.0 Upload we have already learned from SAP (to our surprise) that the only way is to redefine publication BUPA_MAIN as "simple intelligent" (Standard is simple bulk). BUPA_MAIN as "simple intelligent" offers a couple of fields (e.g. partner_no, is_customer) which can be defined as filter criteria.
    We have the requirement to filter by a bp status field which is not part of this set. By the way, we expected the filtering in object management (TX R3AC1, filters are only valid for ECC=>CRM Dowload) or at least in the TX CRMC_BUT_CALL_FU by registrating a ZFunction module in CRM outbound for BUPA_MAIN. Under certain circumstances the later leads to errors  in the subsequent middleware processing.
    Has anybody a similiar requirement or does face the same problems?
    Thanks for your help.
    Regards, Mark

    Hi Mark
    Please put this request in the correct forum of CRM Middleware.
    I am sure your will get the right help from the middleware experts.
    Regards

  • Issues with Search Filter Criteria Button in Search Help

    Hi ,
    I have applied an elementary search help to a select option and this help is having four fields. The search help works fne and all the four fields are visible when i do a F4. Now , if i want to restrict the number of entries shown (the number of entries are huge) by clicking the "Search Filter Criteria" button , i dont see any of the four fields using which i can restrict the data . Do we need to do any configuration for this ??
    Regards
    Mayank

    Hi,
    in that search help itself you have a option called maximum number of hits, there is a impact if you restricted also.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Srinivasan.R

  • QBE filter criteria in adf richtable disappears

    Hi,
    i use jdeveloper 11g (11.1.1.0.2) with ADF BC and have the following Problem:
    I have a table with enabled builtin filtering. The table is contained in a page fragment of a taskflow.
    At runtime I am doing the following:
    1) I submit a filter criteria and get the right result. (OK)
    2) goto different page and back to the page with the filtered table (OK)
    3) the table displays the filtered data, but the filter input field is EMPTY (ARGGHHH, very confusing)
    If you create the exact table on a simple page (not in page fragment of taskflow) the filter criteria is still shown in the filter input field as expected (and designed I think)
    So is it a bug? How to work around?
    Thanks,
    Andreas.
    Edited by: koppy on May 28, 2009 9:15 AM

    Hi,
    I have not tried this , but it should work
    you need to get the value of filterModel attribute of af:table
    so, in your backing bean if you can get hold of your table component
    store your filterCriteria somewhere while navigating between pages
    RichTable myFilterableTable = this.getMyFilterableTable(); //assuming your table component is associated with backing bean
    FilterableQueryDescriptor queryDesc = myFilterableTable.getFilterModel();
    //get teh filtercriteria from fiterModel
    Map<String,Object> filterCriteriaMap = queryDesc.getFilterCriteria();filterCriteriaMap will contain your QBE criteria values , re-set your table filterModel , you can use EL to do that in which case now its binded to your backing bean filterCriteriaMap
    hope it helps
    Good Luck
    regards,

  • Filter Criteria will not save in SharePoint Designer

    I have a web page that contains form webpart (for entering search keywords) and a dataview with successful configuration to sql database table.
    In SPD > dataview > Common Tasks:
    I have created parameter with control type and texbox control ID. Then setup the web part connection to link both web parts.
    In the final step I then try to set the filter criteria and choosing columns with available option of parameter name and click ok. The filter values disappear.
    I have followed the steps from the following link:
    http://andyparkes.co.uk/blog/index.php/2008/10/31/creating-a-multi-column-search-form-in-sharepoint-v3-with-sharepoint-designer/
    Why does the Filter criteria not save?
    Thanks in advance.
    -- techChirag

    Hey, I dont suppose anyone's found a solution to this yet? I've succesfully done this on a few different Site Collections, but for some reason it's not working on my latest one. As above, after setting the Filter Criteria and saving the page in SPD2010,
    the filter criteria just dissappears. Random!

  • Filter Criteria in Value Help for InfoObject

    Hi,
    Is it possible to remove the value from Filter Criteria. When I use F4 for a Field (in Screen) , its showing a poup window (Value Help for Info Object) with some personal values. When I click "More Values" option its showing the General Value List, where I can see the Filter Criteria. When I click "Show Filter Criteria", its showing the Criteria with a Value (This value is coming from the field(Screen) from where I am coming). is it possible to avoid of passing value from my screen field to Filter Criteria ?
    Thanks
    Srinivas

    Murugan,
    I really hope that the moderator do not remove my points for this!
    WebDynpro ABAP Select-Options and OVS Help.
    How to Achieve OVS Search Help in Select Option in Web Dynpro ABAP
    How to Use OVS Help For Multiple Input Fields in Select-Options.
    http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/707f0d73-94f0-2d10-97a2-a3776e2118d8?QuickLink=index&…
    Using Select Options in a Web Dynpro(ABAP) Application
    Regards,
    Ashvin

  • Set filter criteria on page 1 for page 2 OData model - "best practice"?

    Hello, I have a problem with an app - where I want to filter data on a second page, based on settings from the first page. I use an OData model.
    The collections on both pages are not related in terms of "navigation" properties, that is my problem and I can not change the data source...
    So I am looking for ideas/best practices to solve this because sometimes my filtering doesn't work... the following problem occurred: Request aborted
    I have a page with a sap.m List with items="{/tabWorkPlace}" and and a local JSON model where I store relevant data during the app lifecycle.
    handleListSelect - first page
    var context = evt.getParameter("listItem").getBindingContext();
    var dataModel = sap.ui.getCore().getModel("dataModel");
    var workplace = context.getProperty("WORKPLACE_ID");
    dataModel.setProperty("/WORKPLACE_ID", workplace);
    this.nav.to("SubMaster", context);
    The general App.controller.js handles the nav.to function:
    var app = this.getView().app;
    var page = app.getPage(pageId);
    if(pageId == "secondPage") {
         page.getController().filterData();
    And the controller of the second page:
    filterData: function() {
    var oModel = sap.ui.getCore().getModel("odata");
    var dataModel = sap.ui.getCore().getModel("dataModel");
    var workplace = dataModel.getProperty("/WORKPLACE_ID");
    var items = this.getView().byId("list");
    var oFilter=new sap.ui.model.Filter("WORKPLACE_ID",sap.ui.model.FilterOperator.EQ,workplace);
    items.getBinding("items").filter(oFilter);
    I don't write this code into the onInit() or beforeRendering() function, because they are called only once and I am navigating back and forth between the two pages, because the pages are created only once and "just" the data is changed.
    The desired page looks like this - with an other collection bound to it:
    <List
      id="list"
      select="handleListSelect"
      items="{/tabWorkstep_Status}"
    >
    But when I call it - then the request gets aborted:
    The following problem occurred: Request aborted
    But despite the fact the Request is aborted, the list on the second page is filtered!
    The filter criteria for the model works when I type it into the browser with URL. Maybe this fails because the data binding for the list didn't took place at this phase?
    I have this pattern (filter criteria on one page and result on the second page) more times - (and I think a better data model would be better with navigation properties would be better, but I cannot change it)
    But at another constellation the filtering doesn't work - same error... the following problem occurred: Request aborted
    I also don't want to change the pattern (page 1 to page 2) into popup lists or this fancy new filtering possibilities because it is not suitable for my use case.
    Is there maybe a more elegant solution - because sometimes filtering works, sometimes don't..., do I have an error in my solution (general approach)?
    Many thanks for any input!
    BR,
    Denise

    Hello, yeah you are right, but it works without the odata> stuff because of this in App.controller.js:
    var uri = "http://localhost:32006/JsonOdataService.svc";
    var oModelMS = new sap.ui.model.odata.ODataModel(uri);
    sap.ui.getCore().setModel(oModelMS, "odata");
    oView.setModel(oModelMS);
    So my question is - how to navigate from one page to another - and on the other page first bind a collection to a select and then when selecting bind certain elements (a textfield) to the selected filtered entity.
    The stuff with context and binding won't work, because the two Collections don't have a navigation/association property between them...
    So for example:
    page1
    select a list item with property color: red and year 1985. Press one of the buttons and pass this criteria to another page.
    page 2:
    show a dropdown box with all car names which fullfill this criteria, and when one car is selected, then display the data for THIS car in several text fields.
    This is not a master->detail navigation example, because on page 1 i select certain criterias, and then with buttons I navigate to several pages with those criterias.
    But since the OData model has no relationships it is really hard to do it manually... With a dummy mock.json like in DJ Adams Fiori like SAPUI5 apps it is no problem... But with OData and no things related to each other it is hard...

  • How to read disqualified rows after filter criteria is applied?

    Hi,
    I Use JDeveloper 11.1.2
    I have a view object, which shows 100 records during initial time. I've applied filter criteria in such a way that it displays only 20 records.
    One of my requirement is to surf the records which are disqualified for the filter criteria (i.e. I should be able to read the rows that are not participated in the filtered View object)
    I didn't find any API for this.
    Can anyone help me on this?
    Thanks in advance.

    There its no api for this. All you can do is to either requery without the filter, or to negate the filter and then query again. Still you have to do this yourself.
    Timo

  • More filter criteria while searching !!!

    Hi All,
    Lets consider a scenario where i am facing a problem while accessing BAPI in WebDynpro.
    Before posting the problem i would like to search first . If i give BAPI in WebDynpro forum search then i will return result that matches for BAPI.
    How about having one more option like "Topic" where i can select that topic while searching .
    Ex : If i want to search in WebDynpro then i should be able to select options like
    "General, UIElements,RFC,WebServices...." etc etc in a dropdown .
    And one more option is searching for all "Answered Questions" for my question. Do we have this option already ?? If so pl ingone this.
    I don't know this use case make sense or not , but i feel this kind of search will reduce duplicate threads in forums.
    In future , SDN can give SMART replies based on the question so that you can achieve some kind of automation !!!
    Best Regards, Anilkumar
    Message was edited by:
            Anilkumar Vippagunta

    Hi Anilkumar,
    You are correct in that using solved as an additional search criteria has already been requested here:
    Forum Search - no indication if the thread is solved.
    I agree that this is important and have added as a request to changes, thanks.
    No promise of how quickly implemented, though .

  • Middleware-Filter criteria for Transactions replication.

    Hi Experts,
    Can we use filter criteria while transferring transactional data from CRM to R/3.
    Like i want to restrict the replication of transactions of some BP's who belongs to one particular region. Based on the region field can i put the filter criteria for the transactions.
    Points will be rewarded.
    Thanks in advance
    Nadh.

    Hi Nadh,
    I dont think if it will work. As this object is used for BulK messaging, hence you will not be able to create filters.
    Regards
    Keshav
    PS: Please reward point if the info is useful.

  • Additional sub criteria for Vendor Evaluation tab in SES (ML81N).

    Hi,
    I like to add two additional sub criteria for Vendor Evaluation tab in SES (ML81N). Based on which vendor evaluation will be calculated.
    1. Safety/Envt Upkeep
    2. Morale
    These two are added in SPRO->Purchasing->Vendor Evaluation ->Define Criteria. But not displayed in ML81N->Vendor Evaluation tab.
    Existing criteria. 1) Quality of Service and  2) Service Timeliness are already available.
    Thanks in advance.
    Chetan Shah

    Hello Chetan,
    have you checked note 79166 "MM-SRV Hint: Vendor evaluation for service"?
    Define an evaluation criterion for services in Customizing of the vendor evaluation to be able to use the vendor evaluation also for the services management.The main criterion must contain the determination methods 'C' (determination from the quality valuation of the service) and 'D' (determination from the timeliness rating of the service) in the sub-criteria.
    Kind Regards
    TomT

  • Additional splitting criteria

    Hello,
      I need to use two custom fields as splitting criteria during delivery creation from Sales Order and during invoice creation from delivery: as fields ZUKRL and ZUKRI, provided for this aim, are already almost completely full, I need an additional way to achieve this.
    Does anybody know of there is a user-exit or a routine, or something else, where I can carry out changes to make the program behave with my custom fields in the same way as it happens with ZUKRL and ZUKRI?
    Thanks in advance.
    Best regards,
    Andrea

    Hi,
    Giving below an example of splitting based on the Item category.
    In trx VTFA (if your billing is sales order based) choose your billing type and SO type, there select your item categories and there select the field VBRK/VBRP data. In that field you will see the currently used routine. With the help of your ABAP guy create a copy of that routine under a different number and add your lines of code. Let's say you use routine 001. 
    FORM DATEN_KOPIEREN_001.
    Header data
    VBRK-xxxxx = ............
    Item data
    VBRP-xxxxx = ............
    Additional split criteria
    DATA: BEGIN OF ZUK,
    MODUL(3) VALUE '001',
    VTWEG LIKE VBAK-VTWEG,
    SPART LIKE VBAK-SPART,
    END OF ZUK.
    ZUK-SPART = VBAK-SPART.
    ZUK-VTWEG = VBAK-VTWEG.
    VBRK-ZUKRI = ZUK.
    ENDFORM.
    This is how it should look after modification:
    Header data
    VBRK-xxxxx = ............
    Item data
    VBRP-xxxxx = ............
    Additional split criteria
    DATA: BEGIN OF ZUK,
    MODUL(3) VALUE '001',
    VTWEG LIKE VBAK-VTWEG,
    SPART LIKE VBAK-SPART,
    PSTYV LIKE VBAP-PSTYV,    <- New line
    END OF ZUK.
    ZUK-SPART = VBAK-SPART.
    ZUK-VTWEG = VBAK-VTWEG.
    ZUK-PSTYV = VBAP-PSTYV.   <- New line
    VBRK-ZUKRI = ZUK.
    ENDFORM.
    Like wise incorporate your fields which you intend to do the splitting.
    Regards,
    Saju.S

Maybe you are looking for