ADOBE, please fix CC application, it's broken beyond repair.

Just look at the list of people have problems with CC application. It's so bad that if you do a google search on the problem there will be 100+ pages of hits on the problems with CC from professionals to the hobbiest.
I want to stay with Adobe products, but what's happened to your technical experience?
You need a "real" solution to the updater, not a guess work, someone needs to really identify the problem (give you a hint, is security context related). Clearly the group that coded the Adobe CC application updater doesn't have the necessary technical skills/understanding of the Windows OS.
Repeat of what I posted in another thread:
The Adobe Creative Cloud tool is terrible!! I've done all the suggested "fixes" and they simply don't work. I've contacted support and gone thru the opm.db file deletion process and that didn't work.
1. I'm constantly being asked to "Sign-In" whenever I open any CC products.
2. I have two Adobe icons in my Task bar, one is CC icon the other is Adobe Application Updates icon
3. Selecting Adobe Application Updates icon and right click and selet Open Updater does nothing
4. Select Adobe CC icon and clicking on the HOME tab just shows a blue spinning wheel (dashed) that never stop
5. Select Adobe CC icon and click on Files says "Coming soon"
6. Select Adobe CC icon and click on Apps is the only thing that works shows my installed app and those apps need updates
7. Select Adobe CC icon and click on Fonts says "Coming soon"
I'm a software engineer so I know a thing or two about Windows 7 OS, Adobe are NOT installing their CC under correct security context and they are also trying to display a UI element (User Interface) under a different security context (the systray context) which is not allowed under Windows 7 security model. And I also suspect that my CS6 products Application Updater is conflicting with Adobe CC. If you take a look at your Windows Services, you'll see:
A. AdobeARMservice (Adobe Acrobat Update Service)
B. AdobeFlashPlayerUpdateSvc (Adobe Flash Player Update Service)
C. SwitchBoard (Adobe SwitchBoard)
And if you take a look at running processes:
i. AAM Updates Notifier (Adobe OOBE component)
ii. Adobe CEF Helper (Adobe CC process)
iii. Adobe CEF Helper (Adobe CC process)
iv. Adobe CEF Helper (Adobe CC process)
v. CEPServiceManager (Adobe common process)
vi. acrotray.exe (Adobe Acrobat 11 process)
vii. Adobe CEF Helper (Adobe CC process)
viii. Creative Cloud
So I don't have a single Adobe application "running" yet I have 8 Adobe related processes running and 4 of them are instances of the same executable. I have 3 Adobe windows services running also.
Do Adobe have a big problem with their services and CC and Updaters, YEP! Is the problem related to having CS6 installed AND not understanding Windows OS security context, YES!
Adobe have some great applications, but whatever group is responsible for their update/CC process doesn't appear to have adequate programming experience/knowledge.
I'm at the point of stopping my Adobe CC subscription due to the lack of support from Adobe over these continued problems that myself and MANY MANY others are having with CC.
Rob.

Rob,
Thank you, I have forwarded a copy of your post to our Windows Group.
I am in the Mac group but I do use use the windows version when developing work flows.
We needed the file sharing feature of CC for teams and bought into the "team" packages because of the smoke and mirror tricks at MAX.
"Adobe have some great applications, but whatever group is responsible for their update/CC process doesn't appear to have adequate programming experience/knowledge.
The software is good but work groups and workflows they are too imature to provide professional services to the community that they themselves helped create.
We are trying to get our team accounts reduced to single user account and save some money as Adobe can not provide us with file sharing. Adobe does not have a down grade option only up-grade accounts, we are attempting cancel these accounts and purchase single user accounts and control this through a credit card company to manage it for us.
As for file sharing we turned to our Internet service provider, the master of servers put together a cloud environment that's works for our catalogue and magazine workflow's. We have printers, retailers, buyers, publishers, advertisers, designers and web developers that all need to share files together in a work group performing a workflow.
http://www.forttechnology.ca/index.php/ticklevault
Having to buy full CC team accounts to share files with users that use Acrobat Reader to only "look" at files is not worth it. Make a printer buy software they already own to share files, not going to happen. Make designers buy software to get client work at home, they are lined up at the door. Offer to pay for it and they send us flowers on our birthdays,
The difference in Price between single and team is $20 a month per seat. You don't need many user to pay for your own cloud systems.
Myself and some others I work with have 30 years of education invested in PostScript and Adobe's products. Our approach is to take advantage of Adobe failings. We will continue to follow this wounded animal. A PostScript meal is soon to be had again, says one of the victors of the clone wars. It just has an Internet flavor to it.

Similar Messages

Adobe: Please fix the spacebar cut in multi-camera editing!!

Dear Adobe,
Please fix the BUG which makes a cut in your multi-camera sequence when you hit the spacebar! This is extremely annoying!!
Thanks!
Former FCP User
- Ryan

(imagine the opening of Thriller with the door creaking open and footsteps...you've awoken a sleeping giant...well, not sleeping, recovering actually)
Hi TacoRye.
Welcome to the club. When I saw this post, my eye twitched, my shoulders tensed up and I was brought back to a time (http://forums.adobe.com/message/4714549#4714549) when hitting stop did things that were wrong...just wrong. But as one who's been shut down and locked out of that topic, I'll kindly say that yes, multicam is a bit more enjoyable and free of that design flaw in Premiere CC. In fact, you'll probably like it for a few more things in CC as it's true that they have implemented several FCP favorites in the recent releases that even old schoolers probably say "hmmm, well now this is useful". I was a convert to CS6 from FCP this time last year and open to new things but that stop/pause issue drove me nuts. But it's fixed now in CC. And although I'm dealing with equally frustrating issues in CC on a daily basis unrelated to multcam, unless you use Warp Stabilizer a lot you probably won't experience them. All new software will have its bugs, etc. and I'm still holding out hope that the upcoming release will fix these issues. I have faith. Lots of exciting new features are coming in the next week or so which is all nice and good, but if the actual issues and bugs are fixed, I for one will be even happier.
Bottom line: I encourage you to update to Premiere CC if you do a lot of multicam. Just be sure to update to at least 7.0.1 (the current version as of this post) because the regular 7.0.0 version has a pretty awful multicam bug unrelated to the CS6 thing.
Enjoy...and don't be scared.
(exit with sound of that guy from Thriller laughing...door shuts)

I cant get itunes on my new laptop. My laptop says I have to remove itunes from another computer as I can only have it on 5. Problem is that apart from my ipad, I no longer have the others as they were either broken beyond repair or lost. Any ideas?

I am not good with computers. I am trying to get my iTunes onto this new laptop but it says I am only allowed to have it on 5 computers and I must take it off one to ut it on this new laptop. Problem is, apart from my iPad, I have lost one laptop and two have been broken beyond repair so I am unable to take it off! Anyone any ideas? I have tried to get iTunes support but cant get past the "date of purchase" as I can only guess when I bought my ipod (2009)

Hang on...
You can only authorise the songs you purchase from the iTunes Store to play on five computers.
You can download and install iTunes (the iTunes programme) onto as many computers as you wish.
Two different things.
Assuming therefore, that your problem is that you have authorised five computers, but now no longer have some of them, you need to de-authorise all your computers and then re-authorise the computers you still have.
To de-authorise your computers, go to your account in the iTunes Store and look for the Deauthorise All button.

Adobe, please fix these bugs/features in Muse

So, here are a couple of really annoying things/bugs that keep happening in Muse.
(I've been working with the software for about three weeks, latest Muse CC update, on a MBP Retina, OS X 10.9.5, NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M 1024 MB + 16 GB 1600 MHz DDR3)
1. When I try to hit "Preview" and browse my website, the links to other pages than the initial one don't work, and you need to go back to the "Plan" and open each one of them individually, and then hit "Preview" in all of them, in order to be able to browse the entire website without getting blank pages.. Is there any way to come around this, and be able to set Muse to render ALL of the pages before previewing the website?
2. When I try to adjust the sizes of thumbnails in a slideshow, and zoom in on guides, it's IMPOSSIBLE to make them align perfectly to ANYTHING! The thumbnails just keep moving and popping around, and they don't follow the mouse movements at all, they just make rough changes in sizes and are very hard to work with. It doesn't matter if I zoom in 800% for example, things don't move or adjust smoothly at all, like in Illustrator for example.
3. Sometimes, it's impossible to copy a slideshow- it just freezes, even if I click down and select the thumbnail box. It seems like a bug, since the copy function comes back after I quit and restart the software, or just make a new slideshow from scratch and then delete it (seems to re-set something, I don't have a clue). The "copy" button under the "Edit" menu is simply shadowed out.. Why is that? It would be really nice to be able to alt-click-drag-and-drop these things, especially when you try to build a portfolio.. But, this is impossible for me, at the moment- the plus-sign in the green circle pops up, but it just moves the thumbnail section, it doesn't copy it..
4. Is there ANY way to make all slideshow thumbnail sections moveable? Even if they have the option "Free Form Thumbnails" deselected? What if I need to move lots of galleries on the same page, that need to have different form options selected, for visual reasons? At the moment, I can't select all different thumbnail galleries on my page, and move them all at the same time, which is quite irritating..
5. When I click a thumbnail in the middle or at the end of the gallery, there's a fast flash of previous images in the gallery, before the chosen image is shown fullscreen. Is there any way to get rid of this unwanted visual glitch? I just want them all to open like the very first image in the gallery, without any ghosting of previous images.. I have the horizontal swipe effect in these galleries, if that makes any difference..
6. Is there any way to make custom adjustments to thumbnail sizes, inserting a fixed width and height? Or, save a slideshow as a template, to use the same properties in another gallery?
7. Will it ever be possible to have different sizes of thumbnails in the same slideshow? What's the best way to make a gallery in a portfolio with artworks of different aspect ratios?
8. Why is not my embedded Youtube videos included when I export the project like a html-file? There's only a broken link/code in the video area, at the moment.. Will this be a problem later, when I really need to upload it on my server?
9. Is it not possible at all to import svg-files in a slideshow? Why is it possible in external widgets, but not in the built-in slideshow widget? I can place and import svg-files into the page, but not drag or import them to the slideshow itself..
I really like Muse, but I find it very hard and irritating to work with lots of times, so please fix these issues, or tell me how to avoid them, thanks!

A BIG THANK YOU for taking the time to share your thoughts regarding how to improve Muse. I've interspersed comments and clarifications below.
1. When I try to hit "Preview" and browse my website, the links to other pages than the initial one don't work, and you need to go back to the "Plan" and open each one of them individually, and then hit "Preview" in all of them, in order to be able to browse the entire website without getting blank pages.. Is there any way to come around this, and be able to set Muse to render ALL of the pages before previewing the website?
There are multiple ways to preview your work when using Muse.
Preview Mode - When you click the Preview button at the top right to open Preview Mode Muse will generate the HTML, CSS, JavaScript, images and assets for the page in the front Design view (or the Home page, if you're not in Design view) in the Preview tab/window. If you navigate to a different page by following a hyperlink Muse will generate the code for that page and display it. This in-app preview uses the OS browser, so the display uses Safari on the Mac or IE on Windows. Since the code for each page is generated/updated when it's navigated to, navigation to a page for the first time is slow.
Preview Page in Browser - If you select this option the code for the current page is generated and opened in your default browser. If you follow a link to another page, it will fail with a 404 file not found error, since this option only previews a single page. It's fast, but limited to one page.
Preview Site in Browser - If you select this option the code for your entire site will be generated and your home page will be opened in your default browser. You can freely navigate between pages via hyperlinks, since the preview exported the code for all the pages of your site. This option is very convenience for previewing your full site, but is much slower for a multi-page site than Preview Page in Browser.
Publish - If you select this option you can create a free temporary website on Adobe hosting. This is very handy when you want to view your site on multiple devices or have someone else review the site before you Publish or Upload the site to its production hosting location.
2. When I try to adjust the sizes of thumbnails in a slideshow, and zoom in on guides, it's IMPOSSIBLE to make them align perfectly to ANYTHING! The thumbnails just keep moving and popping around, and they don't follow the mouse movements at all, they just make rough changes in sizes and are very hard to work with. It doesn't matter if I zoom in 800% for example, things don't move or adjust smoothly at all, like in Illustrator for example.
The web is pixel based. There are (mostly) no fractional amounts. While you can zoom in, ultimately your output will be aligned (and limited to) whole pixel boundaries.
When working with thumbnails, the ramifications of working in whole pixel based media are magnified. For example, if you're using tiled thumbnails and have an 8 wide layout the total width will have to be a multiple of 8. You can only increase all 8 by whole pixel increments.
3. Sometimes, it's impossible to copy a slideshow- it just freezes, even if I click down and select the thumbnail box. It seems like a bug, since the copy function comes back after I quit and restart the software, or just make a new slideshow from scratch and then delete it (seems to re-set something, I don't have a clue). The "copy" button under the "Edit" menu is simply shadowed out.. Why is that? It would be really nice to be able to alt-click-drag-and-drop these things, especially when you try to build a portfolio.. But, this is impossible for me, at the moment- the plus-sign in the green circle pops up, but it just moves the thumbnail section, it doesn't copy it..
If Muse is truly freezing, we'd need to understand more about the steps involved. What I expect you're encountering is the fact you can copy and paste an entire widget, but you cannot copy and paste the individual parts of a widget. If you select the widget cut and copy are enabled. If you click a second time to select one part of the widget, then cut and copy are disabled. Most the widgets don't support having two parts of the same type (i.e. two next buttons, two sets of thumbnails, etc.) so at least copy and paste can't currently be supported. Those are limitations we'd like to remove, but for now they are the current limitations when working with widgets.
4. Is there ANY way to make all slideshow thumbnail sections moveable? Even if they have the option "Free Form Thumbnails" deselected? What if I need to move lots of galleries on the same page, that need to have different form options selected, for visual reasons? At the moment, I can't select all different thumbnail galleries on my page, and move them all at the same time, which is quite irritating..
I believe you're asking to be able to simultaneously select the thumbnail sets for multiple slideshow widgets? You're correct, that's currently not supported. The selection model is limited to selecting items that are siblings in the Layers panel. You can select two slideshow widgets, but not the parts inside one widget at the same time as the parts inside another.
5. When I click a thumbnail in the middle or at the end of the gallery, there's a fast flash of previous images in the gallery, before the chosen image is shown fullscreen. Is there any way to get rid of this unwanted visual glitch? I just want them all to open like the very first image in the gallery, without any ghosting of previous images.. I have the horizontal swipe effect in these galleries, if that makes any difference..
Noted as a feature request. When the sliding transition was implemented the most common ask was for the current behavior, so that's what's provided. Fade provides a transition between two images without any feedback of the images that were passed over.
6. Is there any way to make custom adjustments to thumbnail sizes, inserting a fixed width and height? Or, save a slideshow as a template, to use the same properties in another gallery?
Given the next question is about setting each thumbnail to be a different size, I'm not sure I understand this question. You can select a thumbnail and enter height and width values in the Transform panel or Control Strip. However, all thumbnails share the same size, so all of them will be updated to the new size. Not sure that answers what you're asking?
[edit: Zak] Regarding the second half of this question, a slideshow (or any other object or collection of objects) can be saved in the Library and used again in later projects.
7. Will it ever be possible to have different sizes of thumbnails in the same slideshow? What's the best way to make a gallery in a portfolio with artworks of different aspect ratios?
When "Scale to Fit" is used for the sizing of the thumbnails, they will appear with the aspect ratio of the original image sized to fit within the thumbnail container box.
8. Why is not my embedded Youtube videos included when I export the project like a html-file? There's only a broken link/code in the video area, at the moment.. Will this be a problem later, when I really need to upload it on my server?
Insufficient information here to be certain, but I suspect you've exported to a local folder and then opened the index.html (or other .html) file in your browser? When open a file directly in your browser "file://" protocol is used. Many/most services such as YouTube won't work on a .html page loaded using "file://" protocol. That's part of why Muse has a built-in mini-web server and the Preview, Preview Page in Browser and Preview Site in Browser features, which server up the .html files using "http://" protocol. Or you can Publish to a free temporary site on Adobe hosting.
9. Is it not possible at all to import svg-files in a slideshow? Why is it possible in external widgets, but not in the built-in slideshow widget? I can place and import svg-files into the page, but not drag or import them to the slideshow itself..
Correct. Support for SVG was recently added for Muse 2014.2. Support for including SVG graphics in slideshows was not part of the initial release.
In the future, while it may seem excessive, it's much more effective to create a new thread for each different issue/concern/topic you wish to discuss. When a thread starts with a large number of different topics it often goes unanswered because no one forum member or Adobe staffer feels qualified to respond to all the questions. Or, if it does get responses, it ends up being impossible to follow the discussion because so many different topics are intermingled. Thanks.

Adobe please, fix upload/download speed problems!

Adobe please, before all, fix the upload/download speed issues when updating folios from the computer to the servers and from the servers to the Ipad. It has been so terrible lately.
Thx!
al3nai

Or, better yet, focus on developing great software like you've been doing for years and leave the "cloud" stuff to others. I'd feel a lot better about DPS if I knew I could host it all myself.
Thanks,
Chris

How do i get back my audio book if the computer i used to sync with is broken beyond repair

How do i get back my audio book if the computer i used to sync with is broken beyond repair

get it back from the backup which I'm sure you made.

ADOBE PLEASE FIX THIS SOFTWARE

I was considering purchasing this software but it is so buggy I cannot begin to express my frustration. Are we beta testers ? Why can't these issues get resolved. I have had the dreadful 0x0000020 error for 3 different projects now during the past day and no i did not uncheck and check "animate buttons". This is a real pain. The solution is to rebuild the dvd every time? How is this software aimed at professionals wanting to create dvds in a business environment. These constant crashes due to this error are unacceptable. What would I say to a client sitting with me waiting for their project to burn? Sorry I have to redo everything please wait? To say that this is an OS problem and alleviate responsibility is not the right thing. I love the idea that this software works with photoshop, I like how it works when it does but authoring dvds in this buggy environment is REAL FRUSTRATING

I'm also extremely frustrated with Encore. It cost me months of unpaid time. It is definetely the buggiest piece of the CS suite and it didn't get any better through all it's versions.
I have been talking to support many times and I got a sack full of bugs confirmed, some of them major bugs that even corrupt files (some weren't fixed for three or four versions.)
Each software has bugs, but teh main problem in Encore is that it just doesn't handle user or internal errors gracefully. It just crashes or hangs. There is no recovery mode or something similar. I definetley can't recommend it if you have to make a living out of it. The chances that you loose a lot of time and money are very high even if you do everything correctly. You might just edit a menu and Encore crashes and corrupts the file - making you have to redo the whole project from scratch.
After I will have finished my current projects, which are already three months delayed, because of Encore bugs I will finally dump Encore and either spend much more money for professional authoring software or might go for Studio Pro on the MAC that I tried recently and had a much better experience with.
The first problem for us customers is that there is no real competitor for the PC. (On the MAC Studio Pro is by length better in stability and features.) So Adobe has no real need to put more effort into Encore.
The second problem is that software is treated differently than any other product. A car manufacture has to face product liability. A software manufacture does not. It must become cheaper for software manufacture to make better software and not the other way around as it is today. I would recommend a law that requires a software vendor to fix reported bugs (behaviour that differs from the specs in the manual) for free in a certain time frame (e.g. 6 weeks) or the customer can deduct a certain amount from the purchased price. If a advertised piece of a programm is not working you should not pay for it. Period. This would make it cheaper for the vendor to develop better software right away. Nowadays all major software vendors use the 5% rule. If a bug is not reported by more than 5% of the user base it won't be fixed. It doesn't matter if the bug is serious or you can't use a feature. (I never forget the nught shifts because Encore corrupted projects when you tried to enter subtitles manually). Nowadays a bug might be fixed in the next version, which the customer has to pay again, even he paid already for a version that should have done it correctly.
Some people say that software becomes so expensive that you can't afford it anymore. I don't think so. Anyway it think it would be better to knwo what you are getting into it and get a piece of software for a couple of hundred dollars and then loose a couple of thousands, because it doesn't work.
I really can understand the frustration of many users that pay real money for Encore and then don't get the value for their money that has been advertised and they expect.

Adobe, please checkout this application

Hello Adobe,
You should checkout our Flex / AIR Application.
It is the largest Flex / AIR project / application I had ever
seen.
It has over 150 modules, built on 5 Flex projects and uses
over 1150 libraries.
The Functionality is enormous and the application rocks !!!
We give Free Digital Signage ( Advertising monitor software )
We actually re-developed some of the Flex code due to bugs
and memory leaks.
We will be happy to work closely with Adobe developers on
stability and performance issues.
Just check it out, you will be happy you did.
go to:
http://www.MediaSignage.com
Regards,
Sean - MediaSignage.com

I am having exactly the same issue. Here is simple test case:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<s:WindowedApplication creationComplete="creationComplete(event)" xmlns:fx="http://ns.adobe.com/mxml/2009"
                                                     xmlns:s="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/spark"
                                                     xmlns:mx="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/mx">
          <fx:Script>
                    <![CDATA[
                              import mx.events.FlexEvent;
                              protected function creationComplete(event:FlexEvent):void
                                        var timer:Timer = new Timer(1000);
                                        timer.addEventListener(TimerEvent.TIMER, onTimer);
                                        timer.start();
                              private function onTimer(event:Event):void
                                        videoDisplay.source = null;
                                        videoDisplay.source = "file:///D:\\test.flv";
                    ]]>
          </fx:Script>
          <s:VideoDisplay id="videoDisplay"/>
</s:WindowedApplication>
The only workaround which works for me is to call System.gc() in the onTimer function. So it seems like for some reason garbage collector can't determine automatically that app runs out of memory.
Best Regards, Aleksey

Adobe please fix the damn thing already!!

I don't know about you guys but i manage a lot of projects every day at work and my Media Cache keeps growing and growing... a couple of days ago i deleted it throught the Preferences of each program (Premiere, Encore and Soundbooth) and it was about 800GB!!! (yes, gigabytes, no kidding). Now Encore keeps recreating allllll the files, mainly .cfa and .pek and there is no way to stop it.
This is ridiculous because it shouldn't matter for Encore. I'm only using few files, why the hell does it need the cache of all the files i ever used on the computer?!???
Guys do me a huge favor and report this ginormous bug because is there SINCE CS2 and i can't belive there is no alternative o solution.
Please put an option to automatically delete media cache for projects that haven't been open in over week or something, put an option to clean the cache properly without it coming back to hunt you and your hard disk space, give the user the option to stop the process of recreating the damn files or don't let it take over your app completely (right now i'm burning a 740mb project on DVD and is taking over 40 minutes because it is recreating the media cache files).
FOR GOD SAKE DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT!!!!
sorry about the way i'm posting but this issue is been getting on my nerves since the dawn of time.
EDIT:
Almost forgot. To recreate the issue just create a project in encore and keep importing and deleting different files (i usually work with M2V+AC3). Even if you delete the files from the project the media cache file remains as well as a trace of it in the project itself and that is why it keeps recreating the files. So for a project of just first play no issue. Just recreate the project and done but if you have a custom menu that u use for many videos the more you use it the hardest it gets to work with it and if the only way to fix it is recreating the project i'm screwed. That means recreate the menu from scratch

why the hell does it need the cache of all the files i ever used on the computer?!???
That's never happened for me. Even though I use a template project called Miscellaneous for a lot of different tests, it's never happened. When I empty the cache (manually through Windows Explorer), things I no longer need stay deleted.

Adobe-Please FIX Flash Player! CPU/Memory hog on Mac OS X

Each time I encounter Flash on a web page (read: ALL the time) my CPU usage gets throttled to the top, real memory / virtual memory goes through the roof, and my fan starts blowing away.
Flash is effectively making the web terribly annoying to surf.
I'm on a relatively recent MacBook, 2.2Ghz Intel Cour 2 Duo with 4GB or RAM, running the latest Leopard build.

I second your complaint. apparently many others do as well, judging by the many threads on this topic. I have a Macbook (circa 2007) that works fine for browsing, unless flash player plugin goes active, then my system slows to a crawl. I have to open the Activity Monitor utility and shut down FP to get back to normal. I guess Adobe doesn't care because this have obviously been a problem for years (again based on the many threads) and nothing has been done to fix it.

ADOBE PLEASE FIX THE FOLIO BUILDER ISSUES!!!

It is so amazing how many complaints there on this issue and it is still not fixed. We are paying monthly for the service to work.
Come on ADOBE! Why do you waste our time and money!
AND PS your customer service needs some work too!

(imagine the opening of Thriller with the door creaking open and footsteps...you've awoken a sleeping giant...well, not sleeping, recovering actually)
Hi TacoRye.
Welcome to the club. When I saw this post, my eye twitched, my shoulders tensed up and I was brought back to a time (http://forums.adobe.com/message/4714549#4714549) when hitting stop did things that were wrong...just wrong. But as one who's been shut down and locked out of that topic, I'll kindly say that yes, multicam is a bit more enjoyable and free of that design flaw in Premiere CC. In fact, you'll probably like it for a few more things in CC as it's true that they have implemented several FCP favorites in the recent releases that even old schoolers probably say "hmmm, well now this is useful". I was a convert to CS6 from FCP this time last year and open to new things but that stop/pause issue drove me nuts. But it's fixed now in CC. And although I'm dealing with equally frustrating issues in CC on a daily basis unrelated to multcam, unless you use Warp Stabilizer a lot you probably won't experience them. All new software will have its bugs, etc. and I'm still holding out hope that the upcoming release will fix these issues. I have faith. Lots of exciting new features are coming in the next week or so which is all nice and good, but if the actual issues and bugs are fixed, I for one will be even happier.
Bottom line: I encourage you to update to Premiere CC if you do a lot of multicam. Just be sure to update to at least 7.0.1 (the current version as of this post) because the regular 7.0.0 version has a pretty awful multicam bug unrelated to the CS6 thing.
Enjoy...and don't be scared.
(exit with sound of that guy from Thriller laughing...door shuts)

Adobe - Please Fix "Upload To Exchange" Web Pages

Two problems:
1. The upload-to-exchange sequence ends badly when using Firefox on Windows - no problem using IE. This problem has persisted off-and-on for years. I've reported it to Customer Service and as website feedback, a few times now, but still it persists.
2. The only options for Lightroom compatibility are: Lr1 & Lr2. - Please add Lr3. Again, I've reported this via customer service and web feedback but still hasn't been fixed.
Nows the time the time is now to fix these problems!!!!!!
Rob

Tom,
That is good to know!
PS - I didn't realize you've been reading the SDK forum too .
Rob

Will someone at Adobe please fix the search function on the Forums? It's been several weeks they've

For weeks now in the Fireworks forum, when I search for anything, I get:
Variable FTVAR_RESULTTYPE is undefined.
Resources:
* Enable Robust Exception Information to provide greater detail about the source of errors. In the Administrator, click Debugging & Logging > Debug Output Settings, and select the Robust Exception Information option.
* Check the ColdFusion documentation to verify that you are using the correct syntax.
* Search the Knowledge Base to find a solution to your problem.
Browser Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.3) Gecko/2008092417 Firefox/3.0.3
Remote Address 10.172.32.24
Referrer http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/webforums/forum/categories.cfm
?forumid=14&catid=193&STARTPAGE=3&FTVAR_FORUMVIEWTMP=Linear
Date/Time 07-Jan-09 05:23 PM
Other people are reporting the same problem and it's been this way for weeks now.
I must say that as a paying customer, I expect better from a company like Adobe.

I have reported the issue to the web team. I'll rattle the chains again.
Some clarification, the FuseTalk forums run on the ColdFusion platform, but are not an Adobe product. It is like Photoshop. It runs on a Macintosh, but it isn't an Apple product. It runs on Windows, but isn't a Microsoft product.
Most folks here know that I'm pretty neutral about comparing the two forums. But I recently had to run some reports on them and activity is about the same on both, with the Macromedia Forums being a little more busy than the Adobe ones. Most people are comfortable with the system they know. At the time of the Adobe/Macromedia merger there were a number of performance issues with the Macromedia Forums. Most of them have been addressed.
There was only one attempt to move from WebCrossing to FuseTalk, and that never saw the light of day. It was back in August 2006 and the project got killed before anything happened. I don't know where the comment about ColdFusion product managers wanting to use that platform for all forums comes from, I've never heard that internally.
In October 2007 we imported all of the data from the Macromedia forums into Web Crossing and did release it for two weeks and that didn't work out well (a big understatement). It was so bad that most people who went through it have suffered some sort of amnesia. They seem to recall that we were moving the other direction (WebX to Fusetalk). But that is not the case. All forums were running on Web Crossing during that experience.
John

Adobe - Please fix your site links?

The Adobe site at Migrating an existing site to another site has a link to " Dreamweaver extension" and another of the same at Editing a site using the extension for Dreamweaver with a link "Download the extension for Dreamweaver CS5 and CS4" that both end up in frustrating dead-ends.

It may be worth them sorting those if you come across those pages, but as a note - they are old guide docs.
BC Help & support

Reader 8 PostScript printing broken beyond repair?

Hi,
It seems to me that, in general, Adobe Reader 8 and above cannot print to PostScript printers from Microsoft Windows.
There are different errors along the lines of:
ERROR: undefinedresource
OFFENDING COMMAND: findresource
although the exact error can vary.
There are many instances of this problem on the forums and the fixes have been:
1. User Reader 7, or
2. Switch to PCL printing
On a large network, both of these options are relatively large tasks. It also seems that we are having to work around something that needs fixing in Reader 8.
Has anybody ever had a formal response from Adobe support? Are the above two options the official fixes for this problem? Does Reader 8 include PostScript support for the hell of it which Adobe have no intention of fixing?
Any help or advice gratefully received,
Leon...

Let me add to your message -- anybody hear from Adobe about the broken Postscript in Reader 8? It broke our HP 840c printer. Since Reader 8.0, printing "all" of a PDF file results in 3 copies of page 1 followed by an error. The problem is with the postscript generated by Reader 8.
So, what did Adobe do to the generated Postscript between R7 and R8?
(The printall works fine to an HP all-in-on 1315 scanner, though; note that the scanner has a different native language from the 840C. Also printing just one page at a time via "print current page" works OK in R8.)
db

ADOBE, please fix CC application, it's broken beyond repair.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for