Af:table filtering(inputDate) don't show results for a specific search date

Hi again to every one.
I have a database table as :
sql> describe YES_NO_DATE_TEST
FECHA TIMESTAMP(6) --> param search
DESCRIPCION VARCHAR2(200 CHAR)
VERIFICADO VARCHAR2(1 CHAR)
I created my Bussines Components, I have a search page, I drag and drop this DataControl as af:table, called : YES_NO_DATE_TESTView1, to a jspx page ( search page ), I enabled sorting and filtering properties in the af:table .
af:inputDate value="#{vs.filterCriteria.Fecha}" id="id1">
<af:convertDateTime pattern="#{bindings.YesNoDateTestView1.hints.Fecha.format}"/>
</af:inputDate>
I run the search page, and show me a : af:inputDate , for choose and put a date.
but, when I choose a date, and press the enter key, the search result by af:inputDate, do not show me nothing.
How I can solve that ?
Note :
In the UI Hints of View Object I put this properties :
format type : simple date
format : dd-MM-yyyy
I'm using JDeveloper 11.1.2.0.0

wht is the database column type..??
It's a TimeStamp Type. ----> FECHA TIMESTAMP(6)
what is the query that is getting executed in the backend... when you do the search... ?
My query in the server is :
Select
FECHA,
DESCRIPCION,
VERIFICADO
FROM YES_NO_DATE_TEST;
are you getting the expected results when you run the query..??
Yes , I m . The query above is made for the View Object. But I don't why when I put a date in the af:inputDate the search don't show me the results that I hope.
Or , Need I to Programaticallly access to the InputDate and passed to a bind variable on the query ??

Similar Messages

  • CQWP does not return result for a specific query when filtering on a managed metadata field.

    Hi,
    We are facing a serious production issue. We've search the web extensively but to no avail.
    Problem:
    CQWP does not return result for a specific query when filtering on a managed metadata field.
    ULS log:
    The Uls logs provides 3 different messages that I could relate to every time the query is executed. The last item(level Medium) is displayed 14 times. For readability I've moved the ULS logs to the bottom of this question.
    Query:
    The query is as follows:
    (I've translated this from dutch so pardon any typo's)
    Query: (top selection) Display items from all sites in the site collection
    ListType: Documentlibrary
    Contenttype:
    Items from this group:Custom Document Contenttypes
    Items from this content type: Verklaring
    Filter: Soort is equal to X
    extra info: the field soort (Type) is a managed metadata field that was assigned the value X
    Managed Metadata Structure:
    -managed metadata service
      -Contoso
        -Enterprise Taxonomy (term set)
          -Document (term)
            -Verklaring (term)
              -Soort (term)
                -x (term)
    EXTRA INFO:
    When I modify the filter to filter on Title the CQWP DOES return the correct document!
    When I modify the query settings to search a specific library the CWQP also does return the correct document! (In this case I am filtering on a managed metadata field).
    QUESTION:
    Why doesn't the CQWP return the document when filtering on a managed metadata field over the entire site collection.
    Why does the CQWP return the document when filtering on a managed metadata field over a single library.
    (The type of information the CQWP should return (Soort:x) is stored in a dozen document libraries!)
    Here are the ULS logs.
    Product: Web Content Management
    Category Publishing
    Level: Monitorable:
    CrossListQueryCache::GetSiteData() caught exception (Microsoft.SharePoint.SPException: Kan deze actie niet voltooien.  Probeer het opnieuw. ---> System.Runtime.InteropServices.COMException (0x80004005): Kan deze actie niet voltooien.  Probeer
    het opnieuw.     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.Library.SPRequestInternalClass.CrossListQuery(String bstrUrl, String bstrXmlWebs, String bstrXmlLists, String bstrXmlQuery, ISP2DSafeArrayWriter pCallback, Object& pvarColumns)    
    bij Microsoft.SharePoint.Library.SPRequest.CrossListQuery(String bstrUrl, String bstrXmlWebs, String bstrXmlLists, String bstrXmlQuery, ISP2DSafeArrayWriter pCallback, Object& pvarColumns)     --- Einde van intern uitzonderingsstackpad
    ---     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.SPGlobal.HandleComException(COMException comEx)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.Library.SPRequest.CrossListQuery(String bstrUrl, String bstrXmlWebs, String bstrXmlLists, String bstrXmlQuery,
    ISP2DSafeArrayWriter pCallback, Object& pvarColumns)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.SPWeb.GetSiteData(SPSiteDataQuery query)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing.CachedArea.GetSiteData(SPWeb web, SPSiteDataQuery
    siteDataQuery, Boolean useSpQueryOnList)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing.CachedArea.GetCrossListQueryResults(SPSiteDataQuery query, SPWeb currentContext, Boolean onlyPopulateCache, Boolean useSpQueryOnList, Int32 lcid)    
    bij Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing.CrossListQueryCache.GetSiteDataResults(CachedArea cachedArea, SPWeb web, SPSiteDataQuery query, Boolean useSpQueryOnList)) for query:  '<ViewFields><FieldRef ID="{fa564e0f-0c70-4ab9-b863-0177e6ddd247}"
    Nullable="True" Type="Text"/><FieldRef ID="{94f89715-e097-4e8b-ba79-ea02aa8b7adb}" Nullable="True" Type="Lookup"/><FieldRef ID="{1d22ea11-1e32-424e-89ab-9fedbadb6ce1}" Nullable="True"
    Type="Counter"/><FieldRef ID="{28cf69c5-fa48-462a-b5cd-27b6f9d2bd5f}" Nullable="True" Type="DateTime"/><FieldRef ID="{1df5e554-ec7e-46a6-901d-d85a3881cb18}" Nullable="True" Type="User"/><FieldRef
    ID="{d31655d1-1d5b-4511-95a1-7a09e9b75bf2}" Nullable="True" Type="User"/><FieldRef ID="{8c06beca-0777-48f7-91c7-6da68bc07b69}" Nullable="True" Type="DateTime"/><FieldRef ID="{30bb605f-5bae-48fe-b4e3-1f81d9772af9}"
    Nullable="True" Type="Lookup"/><FieldRef ID="{ba3c27ee-4791-4867-8821-ff99000bac98}" Nullable="True" Type="Text"/><FieldRef ID="{c5c4b81c-f1d9-4b43-a6a2-090df32ebb68}" Nullable="True"
    Type="Lookup"/><FieldRef ID="{8fca95c0-9b7d-456f-8dae-b41ee2728b85}" Nullable="True" Type="Lookup"/><FieldRef ID="{39360f11-34cf-4356-9945-25c44e68dade}" Nullable="True" Type="Text"/><FieldRef
    ID="{543bc2cf-1f30-488e-8f25-6fe3b689d9ac}" Nullable="True" Type="Image"/><FieldRef ID="{43bdd51b-3c5b-4e78-90a8-fb2087f71e70}" Nullable="True" Type="Number"/><FieldRef ID="{9da97a8a-1da5-4a77-98d3-4bc10456e700}"
    Nullable="True" Type="Note"/><FieldRef ID="{aea3cd20-8da0-4cb7-803b-5a33079a0e4d}" Nullable="True" Type="Lookup"/><FieldRef Name="ScopeId" /><FieldRef Name="_Level" /><FieldRef
    Name="UniqueId" /><ListProperty Name="DraftVersionVisibility" /></ViewFields><Lists ServerTemplate="101"></Lists><Webs Scope="Recursive" /><RowLimit>45</RowLimit><Query><Where><And><BeginsWith><FieldRef
    Name="ContentTypeId" Nullable="True" Type="ContentTypeId"/><Value Type="ContentTypeId">0x010100C5FEE83B67FA6445B0C14AE8B7761BB8011E</Value></BeginsWith><In><FieldRef ID="{aea3cd20-8da0-4cb7-803b-5a33079a0e4d}"
    LookupId="TRUE"/><Values><Value Type="Counter">783</Value></Values></In></And></Where><OrderBy><FieldRef ID="{8c06beca-0777-48f7-91c7-6da68bc07b69}" Nullable="True"
    Type="DateTime" Ascending="FALSE"/></OrderBy></Query>' at url: /. Titel webonderdeel: Inhoudsquery
    Product: Web Content Management
    Category Publishing
    Level: Warning
    Error occured while processing a Content Query Web Part. Performing the following query '<ViewFields><FieldRef ID="{fa564e0f-0c70-4ab9-b863-0177e6ddd247}" Nullable="True" Type="Text"/><FieldRef ID="{94f89715-e097-4e8b-ba79-ea02aa8b7adb}"
    Nullable="True" Type="Lookup"/><FieldRef ID="{1d22ea11-1e32-424e-89ab-9fedbadb6ce1}" Nullable="True" Type="Counter"/><FieldRef ID="{28cf69c5-fa48-462a-b5cd-27b6f9d2bd5f}" Nullable="True"
    Type="DateTime"/><FieldRef ID="{1df5e554-ec7e-46a6-901d-d85a3881cb18}" Nullable="True" Type="User"/><FieldRef ID="{d31655d1-1d5b-4511-95a1-7a09e9b75bf2}" Nullable="True" Type="User"/><FieldRef
    ID="{8c06beca-0777-48f7-91c7-6da68bc07b69}" Nullable="True" Type="DateTime"/><FieldRef ID="{30bb605f-5bae-48fe-b4e3-1f81d9772af9}" Nullable="True" Type="Lookup"/><FieldRef ID="{ba3c27ee-4791-4867-8821-ff99000bac98}"
    Nullable="True" Type="Text"/><FieldRef ID="{c5c4b81c-f1d9-4b43-a6a2-090df32ebb68}" Nullable="True" Type="Lookup"/><FieldRef ID="{8fca95c0-9b7d-456f-8dae-b41ee2728b85}" Nullable="True"
    Type="Lookup"/><FieldRef ID="{39360f11-34cf-4356-9945-25c44e68dade}" Nullable="True" Type="Text"/><FieldRef ID="{543bc2cf-1f30-488e-8f25-6fe3b689d9ac}" Nullable="True" Type="Image"/><FieldRef
    ID="{43bdd51b-3c5b-4e78-90a8-fb2087f71e70}" Nullable="True" Type="Number"/><FieldRef ID="{9da97a8a-1da5-4a77-98d3-4bc10456e700}" Nullable="True" Type="Note"/><FieldRef ID="{aea3cd20-8da0-4cb7-803b-5a33079a0e4d}"
    Nullable="True" Type="Lookup"/><FieldRef Name="ScopeId" /><FieldRef Name="_Level" /><FieldRef Name="UniqueId" /><ListProperty Name="DraftVersionVisibility" /></ViewFields><Lists
    ServerTemplate="101"></Lists><Webs Scope="Recursive" /><RowLimit>45</RowLimit><Query><Where><And><BeginsWith><FieldRef Name="ContentTypeId" Nullable="True" Type="ContentTypeId"/><Value
    Type="ContentTypeId">0x010100C5FEE83B67FA6445B0C14AE8B7761BB8011E</Value></BeginsWith><In><FieldRef ID="{aea3cd20-8da0-4cb7-803b-5a33079a0e4d}" LookupId="TRUE"/><Values><Value Type="Counter">783</Value></Values></In></And></Where><OrderBy><FieldRef
    ID="{8c06beca-0777-48f7-91c7-6da68bc07b69}" Nullable="True" Type="DateTime" Ascending="FALSE"/></OrderBy></Query>' generated the following error: Kan deze actie niet voltooien.  Probeer het opnieuw.
    at the following url: /. Titel webonderdeel: Inhoudsquery
    Kan deze actie niet voltooien. Probeer het opnieuw. This is Dutch. It means something like: Cannot complete this action. Please try again.
    Product: Web Content Management
    Category Publishing
    Level: Medium (this message is displayed 14 times)
    ConsoleUtilies.GetContextualControlMode had no currentPage so the current SPWebPartManager mode cannot be retrieved.

    Hi,
    while digging through the logging (again) I found some extra logging regarding the same correlation id (see details below).
    We have a fairly large term store (4000+ lines).
    If somebody has a clue or tip that would greatly appreciated!
    03-19-2014 13:49:51.87 w3wp.exe (0x2098) 0x23BC SharePoint Foundation Database fa42 Monitorable A large block of literal text was sent to sql.  This can result in blocking in sql and excessive memory use on the front
    end.  Verify that no binary parameters are being passed as literals, and consider breaking up batches into smaller components.  If this request is for a SharePoint list or list item, you may be able to resolve this by reducing the number of fields. 1971313a-6baa-49e9-bace-d024ce67f25c
    03-19-2014 13:49:51.87 w3wp.exe (0x2098) 0x23BC SharePoint Foundation Database fa43 High Slow Query Duration: 127.1515 1971313a-6baa-49e9-bace-d024ce67f25c
    03-19-2014 13:49:51.87 w3wp.exe (0x2098) 0x23BC SharePoint Foundation Database fa44 High Slow Query StackTrace-Managed:    bij Microsoft.SharePoint.Utilities.SqlSession.OnPostExecuteCommand(SqlCommand command,
    SqlQueryData monitoringData)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.Utilities.SqlSession.ExecuteReader(SqlCommand command, CommandBehavior behavior, SqlQueryData monitoringData, Boolean retryForDeadLock)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.SPSqlClient.ExecuteQueryInternal(Boolean
    retryfordeadlock)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.SPSqlClient.ExecuteQuery(Boolean retryfordeadlock)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.Library.SPRequestInternalClass.CrossListQuery(String bstrUrl, String bstrXmlWebs, String
    bstrXmlLists, String bstrXmlQuery, ISP2DSafeArrayWriter pCallback, Object& pvarColumns)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.Library.SPRequest.CrossListQuery(String bstrUrl, String bstrXmlWebs, String bstrXmlLists, String bstrXmlQuery, ISP2DSafeArrayWriter
    pCallback, Object& pvarColumns)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.SPWeb.GetSiteData(SPSiteDataQuery query)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing.CachedArea.GetSiteData(SPWeb web, SPSiteDataQuery siteDataQuery, Boolean
    useSpQueryOnList)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing.CachedArea.GetCrossListQueryResults(SPSiteDataQuery query, SPWeb currentContext, Boolean onlyPopulateCache, Boolean useSpQueryOnList, Int32 lcid)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing.CrossListQueryCache.GetSiteDataResults(CachedArea
    cachedArea, SPWeb web, SPSiteDataQuery query, Boolean useSpQueryOnList)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing.CrossListQueryCache.GetSiteDataResults(CachedArea ca, Boolean useSpQueryOnList)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing.CrossListQueryCache.GetSiteDataResults(SPSite
    site, String webUrl, Boolean useSpQueryOnList)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing.WebControls.ContentByQueryWebPart.IssueQuery()     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing.WebControls.ContentByQueryWebPart.GetXPathNavigator(String
    viewPath)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.WebPartPages.DataFormWebPart.PrepareAndPerformTransform(Boolean bDeferExecuteTransform)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.WebPartPages.DataFormWebPart.PerformSelect()    
    bij Microsoft.SharePoint.WebPartPages.DataFormWebPart.DataBind()     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.WebPartPages.DataFormWebPart.EnsureDataBound()     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.WebPartPages.DataFormWebPart.CreateChildControls()    
    bij System.Web.UI.Control.EnsureChildControls()     bij System.Web.UI.Control.PreRenderRecursiveInternal()     bij System.Web.UI.Control.PreRenderRecursiveInternal()     bij System.Web.UI.Control.PreRenderRecursiveInternal()    
    bij System.Web.UI.Control.PreRenderRecursiveInternal()     bij System.Web.UI.Control.PreRenderRecursiveInternal()     bij System.Web.UI.Control.PreRenderRecursiveInternal()     bij System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequestMain(Boolean
    includeStagesBeforeAsyncPoint, Boolean includeStagesAfterAsyncPoint)     bij System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequest(Boolean includeStagesBeforeAsyncPoint, Boolean includeStagesAfterAsyncPoint)     bij System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequest()    
    bij System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequest(HttpContext context)     bij ASP.BLANKWEBPARTPAGE_ASPX_1653093133.ProcessRequest(HttpContext context)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing.TemplateRedirectionPage.ProcessRequest(HttpContext
    context)     bij System.Web.HttpApplication.CallHandlerExecutionStep.System.Web.HttpApplication.IExecutionStep.Execute()     bij System.Web.HttpApplication.ExecuteStep(IExecutionStep step, Boolean& completedSynchronously)    
    bij System.Web.HttpApplication.PipelineStepManager.ResumeSteps(Exception error)     bij System.Web.HttpApplication.BeginProcessRequestNotification(HttpContext context, AsyncCallback cb)     bij System.Web.HttpRuntime.ProcessRequestNotificationPrivate(IIS7WorkerRequest
    wr, HttpContext context)     bij System.Web.Hosting.PipelineRuntime.ProcessRequestNotificationHelper(IntPtr managedHttpContext, IntPtr nativeRequestContext, IntPtr moduleData, Int32 flags)     bij System.Web.Hosting.PipelineRuntime.ProcessRequestNotification(IntPtr
    managedHttpContext, IntPtr nativeRequestContext, IntPtr moduleData, Int32 flags)     bij System.Web.Hosting.PipelineRuntime.ProcessRequestNotificationHelper(IntPtr managedHttpContext, IntPtr nativeRequestContext, IntPtr moduleData, Int32
    flags)     bij System.Web.Hosting.PipelineRuntime.ProcessRequestNotification(IntPtr managedHttpContext, IntPtr nativeRequestContext, IntPtr moduleData, Int32 flags) 1971313a-6baa-49e9-bace-d024ce67f25c

  • Customizing Slideshows - how do I add an image in the text box that only shows up for a specific ima

    Customizing Slideshows - how do I add an image in the text box that only shows up for a specific image and not in every text box?

    Can you maybe provide a screen shot to further explain your question?
    Julia

  • Don't Show Results in obiee.

    Hi Frnds,
    I have a requirement saying that - for any selection of filters. If my Detail Report has less than 5 records then it should show a message saying 'less than 5 records' and don't show the results.
    If the Report has more than 5 records then - user need to view the results.
    Eg: Filters - Manager Id , Department Id
    Report 1 on Dashboard - Employee name, Employee Salary, Department Id, Manager Id
    Report 2 on Dashboard - Employee Address, Employee SSN , Manager Name
    For above selection of Filters if the Total No. Of Records for Report1 < 5 (" Show - No Results ") , If Total no. of Records for Report1 > 5 (Show - Results)
    Similarily, even for Report2.
    Please, let me know how should i need to work on this.
    Thank you.

    You can try filtering MAX(RCOUNT("Manager ID")) > 5. Hope this helps.
    Bharath

  • Date query doesn't show results for today's date

    Hello everyone. I use Jdeveloper 11.1.1.3.0 with ADF and I have a view named query with just one field, Date. The operator it is using is equal to a value written in the field. The problem is that when I insert a row into the table (the date is automatically set to the current date on insertion) and I look for today's date it returns nothing. However if I leave the field empty it will find me the row. I tried doing this with the timestamp option but it's not very user friendly as the user would have to type in the time the row was inserted in order to find it, or use the between operator for two fields which is something I want to avoid if at all possible
    The requirement is one field query that lets the user choose a date from a calendar and shows all rows inserted on that date (even if the date is today and the row was inserted a few minutes before).
    Edited by: Dino2dy on Apr 6, 2011 2:50 AM

    Dino2dy,
    My guess is that the data being stored in the DB has a time component associated with it (as it would if you were using something like SYSDATE to populate it). When you are trying to look for data with today's date, you are checking just for the date - which in Oracle is the equivalent of midnight on the start of the date. The dates don't match because the time is different.
    Either store the date with no time component (use TRUNC to remove the time), use a BETWEEN comparison, or TRUNC the date when comparing.
    John

  • ITunes Plus   Old songs don't show up for upgrades

    I occasionally stumble across previously purchased songs, for example "Time of the Season" by the Zombies, which are now in the plus format. They don't show up in the "Upgrade My Library" area in the store.
    There are also lots of cases where old cuts have slightly different listings and don't match up to what's in my library.
    Is there anyway to get Apple to allow me to upgrade to the Plus versions of these songs?

    "Note that the track usually will have to be the exact same version"
    Ever since iTunes began, there have been problems where the person ripping the music isn't very accurate as to the MP3 tags, and later the titles themselves.
    For example (just making this one up) "Yellow Submarine", 3minutes, Beatles Yellow Submarine can change to "Yellow Submarine", 3 minutes, THE Beatles.... and then it won't show up as a match.
    You will find LOTS of these examples if you search on titles you bought more than a year ago, and even though the song is there, it will say "no longer available" just because someone typed the title differently.

  • Filtering a Query result for a specific value of a key figure

    Hi folks,
    I want to filter a query for a specific value of a key figure. The report should display all customer who has an account balance greater than EUR 500'000.
    Can I only implement this kind of filter via a condition in Query-Designer? If I run that query on an InfoCube with non-cumulative key figures over all our customers (> 400'000) I have problems with the consumption of the memory. If I restrict the amount of the customers to 50'000 - 60'000 then it works. It seems that the query reads all customer records in an internal table before applying the condition.
    Is there another way to deal with? Any help appreciated.
    Kind regards
    Hansjörg Luzi
    Graubündner Kantonalbank
    CH-7002 Chur

    You could try to implement an alternative solution: define a new Characteristc with discrete values (in the following example I suppose to have intervals of 10)
    KF -> CHAR
    115 -> 110 (110 <= KF < 120)
      5 ->   0 (  0 <= KF <  10)
    83 ->  80 ( 80 <= KF <  90)
    Then you can use these dicrete values to filter ...
    I know that it's not so "flexible" (discetization must be predefined), but query response time is quicker and you can use Aggregates ...
    Hope it helps
    GFV

  • Returning Different Results for the  Same Search Value

    I'm creating a word list and I'm using Lookup to find text entries in column D and return values from column A. I can manage one result based on the search criteria however I'm wondering if it's possible to return multiple entries from column A if multiple matches are found in column D:
    As you can see I'm trying to use the formula =LOOKUP("Aggression",D,A) to find all the instances of "Aggression" in column D and return all the corresponding results from column A (audacious, barefaced, and depredation). Lookup however only returns the last match (depredation).

    I wish you'd shown where your LOOKUP function is located and what you're trying to do with it. Are you going to be using these results in another function? Or are you simply wanting to display the results of your search?
    If the latter, there's an elegant way to make this happen. Let's create a single-cell table on the same page, holding the word you're searching for. (Ideally, this could be a drop-down list -- and that can be made to dynamicly hold all the discrete values in column D -- but that's another discussion.) Let's call this table "Search".
    Add a column (which can be hidden) to your original table. Let's insert this next to your column D, making it column E. Cell E2 contains =IF($D2=Search :: $A$1,TRUE,FALSE). Drag/copy that down the column. You'll now have a value of TRUE in this column for all the words you're looking for. Now click on the top of this column E and click "Show More Options".... and click on "Show rows that match the following". Set it to show where Column E is true. You now show only the words in which the "category" matches the search word.
    Change the word in your Search table, and the display of your original table automatically adjusts.
    The nice part is that the entire line is displayed so you can see definitions and contexts as well.
    Vince

  • Public folder flagged items don't appear in For Follow Up search folder

    Exchange Server 2013, Outlook 2010 clients. I monitor a few Public Folders for our organization and items flagged for follow up don't appear in my For Follow Up search folder. What can be done?

    Search Folders do not search Public Folders.  You'd have to copy the item to your Mailbox, or create a Task in your Mailbox.
    Eric Legault (MVP: Outlook;
    About me)
    Outlook Appins: Store social media fields in your Outlook Contacts!
    Co-author, Microsoft Office 2013 Professional Step-By-Step

  • Info Source Overview for a CUBE shows RED for the associated Master Data

    Hi All,
    When i click on the InfoSource Overview for a CUBE, the associated Master Data shows RED even though the Master Data has been loaded successfully.  I am working in BI 7.0.
    What could be the fix for this so that the Monitor Indicator in InfoSource Overview shows the Actual Status (Read Green if successfully Loaded) of the Loads.
    Arjun

    Hi Arjun,
    You might want to check the following links:
    infosource overview
    Infosource Overview
    InfoSource Overview is Red
    I suppose the overview can be ignored in your case.
    Hope it helps.
    Thanks,
    Abhishek.

  • Query not showing result  for 1st column

    dear all,
    i want to show the result row for my query for the 1st column...
    e.g. i have column cost center, po number and vendor both po number and vendor will show the result column but not cost center.. any idea why?
    here are my bex settings for cost center
    supression = never, normalization = no normalization.

    Hello -
    You check for costcenter data in the data targets, for the given PO and vendors,.
    If data exists then it should be available in the reports,.
    Else it won't .
    Regards,
    Vishwa

  • Drop table- is it done in cascade-way for related objects

    If i drop database table, then will everything related to that table be dropped/erased?
    I mean will the table constraints be removed from system tables, wil lthe grants be revoked/deleted from schemas that had grant on that table, and so on?

    Yes,
    drop the table directly but take care of dependencies!
    if you are not 100% sure, you can rename the table:
    alter tabletodrop rename to ifwheredropped;and check all invalid objects:
    select * from all_objects where status!='VALID'and recompile them .. and check if you'll still have dependencies (errors)

  • Visual Studio profiler does not show results for XAML + DirectX project

    The case is simple: 
    1) The solution consists of 3 projects:  2 C# ones  (C# XAML project + C# library project) and one C++ runtime component initially created by the wizard, as this is a DirectX project.
    2) "Start Windows Phone application analysis"  runs OK, but when stopped  no profiling results are shown. The message is "0 total samples collected", "No call tree data is available".
    How can this problem be fixed?  What are the assumed reasons?

    (I know the thread is old - but I have found some threads on the net asking about this problem, but nowhere answered, so I'll rectify this here)
    Hey,
    do you happen to have been profiling the *release build* ?
    If so, try this:
    In solution explorer, right-click on the native C++ project -> Properties -> Configuration Properties -> Linker -> Debugging
    The top-most field "Generate Debugging Info" is probabyl empty, which is default for release build. But debugging info is needed to sample-profile functions! So select "Yes" there, and make sure the next option, "generate program
    database file" has a sensible entry.
    For me, this did it.

  • Historical Report don´t show historical call time specific

    Hi Guys,
    My Customer have a IPCCX 5.0 with redundancy and we have the following problem: The specific group tryed report and verified that for example 2 a.m until 7 a.m don´t appear the historic off calls. Any idea where is the problem?
    Thanks,
    Wilson

    Hi
    Are you sure your CCX server receives calls at that time of night? Is CCM doing Time of Day routing to prevent this, or an external service taking the calls?
    Which reports are you running?
    Some reports report on CSQs, and CSQs may not see calls if your scripts perform time of day checks.
    Regards
    Aaron
    Please rate helpful posts...

  • Highly frustrated with Outlook 2013 Search People box bugs - Multiple Name Results for Same Contact & Inconsistent Results

    The Outlook 2013 "Search People" box does not function properly. It frequently displays incorrect results or a mess of duplicate results. I've reported previous issues about this and consolidating my posts into one (with screenshots this
    time). Hopefully this message will be forwarded to or seen by the Outlook programmers. It really needs to be fixed.
    Outlook 2010 and other prior versions worked perfectly. You search for name, you get ONE result with the info you're looking for. FAST AND EASY. But with Outlook 2013 Microsoft has created a heck of a mess resulting in huge frustration and productivity loss
    with such simple but important tasks.
    I have hundreds of contacts stored in my Outlook address book, and they all have COMPLETE contact info added. 
    One major issue that I'm experiencing in the new Outlook 2013 is that I now get average of 4 or more duplicate name results appearing for the same contact. And each result contains different and incomplete contact info, making it impossible for me to quickly
    find the basic info I'm looking for. The cause of this issue is that Outlook 2013 now provides results from not only your local address book(s), but it also shows results based  on your email history and social media accounts setup.
    And there's no way to turn this off, or at least specify what folders and/or accounts the People Search box should use.
    To make matters worse, the Microsoft developers conveniently forgot to add some form of an indicator (like a small icon besides each name result in the list)  that clearly indicates what result is from what source. So you must manually click on each
    result one at a time and repeat the search until you locate the correct one.
    For one specific example, I have a contact stored in my local address book called
    Infusionsoft. When I type "Infusionsoft" in the People Search box to quickly find a phone number, Outlook  2013 shows me 7 results with the same name. See the screenshot below:
    As you can see in the screenshot above, every result just says "Infusionsoft", so I have to manually click on each name result one at a time and repeat the process until I find the correct one from my address book. This same thing happens with other
    random contacts.
    From what I can tell, Outlook is pulling results based on  based on recent emails I've received from different people with "@infusionsoft.com" in their email address. So the first result shows "[email protected]" (just the email
    address), the second result shows "[email protected]", the third result shows "[email protected]" and so forth. I don't want Outlook to show all of that. I just want what's in my address book!
    And you would think that the last result would be the correct one from my address book, but no. Sometimes its the 5th result, and other times it's the 3rd or 7th result. So there's no freaking order of things here.
    We simply need the ability to turn off searching of email history and other accounts when using the People Search box. Problem fixed.
    (And please don't tell me that I need to "link" every incorrect result to one main contact. You shouldn't expect everyone to have to tediously link any and all results that appear to a record. ESPECIALLY when 5+ results for each contact appear regularly.)
    ISSUE 2: Some names must be typed in a different way for the Search People to locate them
    Another big issue I'm having with the Search People box is that some name searches don’t show the correct result, unless I search for their names in a different way.
    For one specific example, I have a contact stored in my address book named "Dave Johnson". When I type "Dave Johnson" in the Search People box, one result appears, but it's just his email address, only. It's not the result that's stored in my Outlook address
    book with his phone number, addresses, etc. Screen shot below:
    If I type in Dave's name reverse order (Johnson Dave),  no results are found at all.
    Now if I just type in just"Johnson" all by itself, it finds Dave's correct result (the one stored in my Outlook Address Book). Along with everybody else that has "Johnson" in their name (see screenshot below)...
    I double-checked how I have Dave's name programed in my address book, and it's in there as "Dave Johnson" for both the Full Name and File As fields. 
    Also, the name order shouldn't make any difference when using the People Search Box anyway. Sometimes I can find people by Last Name, First Name or First Name, Last Name. Only with random contacts does it get difficult finding  their info and
    I have to do strange things like this to find them from the People Search box.
    ISSUE 3: Some Search People results only yield an email address only.
    For other random contacts, some search results only yield an email address with no other contact details. But I can open the persons contact card from the address book manually, with the same email address shown! Screenshot below...
    In the screenshot above, I have outlined the Search People box results in red, and the Address Book results in green. You can clearly see that "Robert White" is a contact stored in my local address book with full contact details, but the Search People result
    only shows his email address! Again, it's not consitent. It's hit or miss with different people.
    ISSUE 4: Some results just don't appear at all, but they are in the address book
    Another issue I'm experiencing with the People Search Box is that some people simply  cannot be found. But I can see their contact info just fine if I click on the "People" tab down at the bottom of the page and type in their name in the "Search Contacts"
    field. Why can't the People Search box find certain people? I opened up their contact details and cannot find a single thing  that would prevent them from showing up in results.
    These are clearly serious bugs that need to be fixed. And I'm shocked as to how this got missed--or ignored during alpha and beta testing. I see the "idea" behind the developers having the Search People box search everything outside of the
    address book, but in real world application this causes a heck of a lot of problems & confusion, and it needs to be fixed ASAP.
    For technical details, I have Outlook 2013 running on two computers using hosted Exchange 2010. One system is Windows 7 and other is Windows 8. The same problems occur on BOTH computers. As far as my Outlook account setup, I have all contacts stored in the
    main address book (no sub-folders or other folders).
    Can someone help communicate this message to the Outlook developers??? The "Frown" button limits me to 100 characters and one image. There's no way I can communicate this level of detail and steps to duplicate in 100 characters!

    Thanks for your reply.
    1) The instant search boxes in each individual page work just fine. If I am on the People page and type in a name in the "Search Contacts" field, it searches my contacts and displays the results that I want. But I should not have to leave whatever screen
    I'm in to find people now. In Outlook 2010 and earlier versions, I could be on the calendar page and then search for a contact without clicking off the calendar completely. For productivity-sake, it's a huge waste of time and hassle now.
    2) I'm familiar with how contact linking works, and quite frankly it's a huge mess in general. I NEVER create multiple contacts for the same person. I get that Outlook 2013 get confused now when it detects a LinkedIn or Facebook account for the same person
    already in my Outlook address book, but we need to have options that allow us to turn off results from some or all social networks. This is a big part of the problem.
    Think about it this way - The average person has 150+ LinkedIn connections, and more for Facebook. Many people today have accounts for both and they are setup with the same email address. When Outlook 2013 has to scan all the networks IN ADDITION to your
    local address book(s), it's a no brainer that it can get very confused trying to display results.
    Another big part of the problem is that Outlooks new search system also scans your email history. I receive emails from people who use multiple email addresses, or emails from companies with multiple reps or ticket systems that send you a unique
    ticket ID # ending in the same email address domain. Now Outlook displays people search results based on everything under the sun in my email history. This is beyond frustrating (see my "Infusionsoft" screenshot above in the first post).
    Again, I want to stress that for the search examples I referenced, I only have one entry in my Outlook address book for each person. And that's all I want to find when I search for people--what's already in my own address book! 
    In summary:
    We need an OPTION to turn off searching external networks when using the People Search box
    We need an option to tell Outlook to not scan email history for people search results (I think this needs to be disabled entirely actually. It's not helpful at all)
    There should be a fixed priority for displaying people search results, with local address book results FIRST, followed by social network results.
    There should be a clear icon/indicator next to each result that gives you a clue as to where the result is coming from. Your address book? Facebook? LinkedIn? We should not need to click on each result to get a hint as to where it's coming from.
    Work out the bugs in general with the new search system.
    One other thing that I didn't mention is that the Search People box also shows results for people I'm not even "friends" or connected with on the different social networks. But I've noticed that some people use the same email address for those networks that
    I already have programmed for them in my address book, which is why Outlook sometimes shows me these results. Does that make sense?
    I'll try rebuilding the index, but after testing Outlook 2013 on 3 different machines so far and seeing the same results (all slightly different results on each machine and very inconsistent), I doubt this will address the issue.

Maybe you are looking for