Alphanumeric for still images without rearranging ....

Hello all
I'm sure the answer is rather simple but , I'm stumped ..
I have a few image files I need to rename in alphanumeric , I need these images to stay in the order they are in the folder, every time I rename them automator wants to rearrange the images.
Is there something I may be over looking ?
Thank
Message was edited by: JustCallMe Dude
Message was edited by: JustCallMe Dude
Message was edited by: JustCallMe Dude

Welcome to the forums.
Export at full resolution using a lossless codec and then use the free Windows Media Encoder to get the best possible WMV encoding. It has far more options than what is available in PPro.
Cheers
Eddie

Similar Messages

Pixel dimensions for still images

Hello all,
I have just ran into a problem that seems to be a sizing problem with Final Cut Express HD. I used to crop my still pics to 1366 px - 768 px (for landscape) and then import them to FCE and export as a quicktime movie. When I brought the quicktime movie into iDVD and created the DVD it seemed to play great on my 46" Samsung tv -- full screen.
I just recently bought a Samsung 60" and when I create the same type of movies, I am getting a huge black border around the whole image (not just top and bottom but sides too). I tried creating a new movie and made all my still images 1920px x 1080 px, and it still comes out the same way.
I can stretch my tv so that they go full screen, but I think there should be a way to create the movie without having to stretch it....just have the tv set for 16:9, and I feel that it should work.
Any help would be greatly appreciated...thanks.
Norm

When you create a DVD, no matter what the pixel dimensions of your original material, it become 720x480 Standard Definition. This is what a DVD is. If you are creating a DVD that has material that is 16x9, then it creates a DVD that is 720x480 but plays back anamorphic, stretching to create the 16x9 screen.
If you play one of your older DVDs that played correctly on your previous TV, does it play correctly or does it also exhibit the black bars?
If it plays correctly then something has changed in the way you are creating your project in FCE.and encoding and burning the DVD.
If the older DVDs also exhibit the same playback problem, then I believe there is a menu setting on your new TV that will tell it how to display Standard Definition material from your DVD player, and you need to adjust that. (There are also settings in the set-top DVD player that tells it what kind of signal to send based on the what kind of display it is hooked up to.)
MtD

Still Images without flicker

I am looking for the best settings to run a 3d Max walkthrough (with still images) into Premiere CS4 and then export to F4V WITHOUT such a quality loss. I have succesfully exported to .mov and the clip looks great. Try exporting to wmv or F4V or FLV and the file size is small and the quality sucks. The .mov file is 119 mb, too large for client to download. The wmv or flv or f4v look too terrible to send on. I have tried using de-interlacing and flicker control and have had no positive results.
Please help.
Dave

Welcome to the forums.
Export at full resolution using a lossless codec and then use the free Windows Media Encoder to get the best possible WMV encoding. It has far more options than what is available in PPro.
Cheers
Eddie

What PS file settings are used for still images for FCE?

I have images to use/create for the titles and transitions in my first FCE4 project. Using Photoshop CS6, the preset for File > New > Film & Video has the prest size and pixel aspect ratio selections. I thought to use this with HDV 1080p/29.97 and HDV1080/DVCPRO HD 720 (1.33) for any images I need for the project.
Most discussions I see only refer to the pixel size reference for HD image sizes, but nothing addressing the pixel aspect ratio setting for the image. Are these settings ignored in PS and handled in FCE only? Or does it make better quality images to get this "right" in PS when creating the still image?
Thanks in advance.

I'm not quite sure I understand your question. In an ideal world, the graphic material you build in PS should match the sequence settings you intend to edit them into - so, if for no other reason, it reduces the amount of reformatting FCE has to do when rendering them.
But frequently you want to build graphics larger than the frame size of the sequence so that you can re-size and reposition the graphic within FCE without losing quality.
The apparent pixel aspect ratio of your graphic can be controlled with FCE by editing the graphic to the timeline, double clicking on the clip in the timeline, and when that timeline clip opens in the viewer, click on the motion tab and adjust the Aspect Ratio Paddle (this is the correction for a 1920 x1080 square pixel clip being placed into an HDV 1440 x 1080 timeline):
In Photoshop, you can change the way your work is displayed by going to the menu View > Pixel Aspect Ratio:
Does any of this help?
MtD

Poor rendering quality for still images

I have opened a new project with PAL DSLR settings (1080p, 25fps).
I have added a full res (about 4000px x 3000px) still image to the timeline and added a pan effect to it. When I view the preview in PE it looks fine. However, when I render the clip the quality is very poor in the preview.
I have tried exporting the clip to a file and this plays fine, but the preview does not look good.
Any ideas why the rendering should have this effect?

pickera2
I have a few things for you to consider and tryout if interested.
First, you are taking a 4000 x 3000 4:3 still into a 1920 x 1080 16:9 project (you say project preset = PAL/DSLR/1080p/DSLR 1080p25).
Your problem is confined to the preview of the pan and zoom result using the Pan and Zoom Tool (I am assuming the you are using Premiere Elements 10 or 11 or 12...I do not recall that you said which one).
Edit Menu/Preferences/General includes the preference "Default Scale to Frame Size" and it does just that. It is typically found ON. So, when your 4000 x 3000 pixels still is imported, the program tries to fit it as best possible into the 1920 x 1080 16:9 space set up in the Edit Mode monitor (Magnification = Fit) by the project preset. In your case, you would expect to see the following with black borders:
Is that what you are taking into the Pan and Zoom workspace? Or are you scaling what is seen there so that the image just fills the 1920 x 1080 space? Does it look like the following after scaling, if you do scale to fit?
And important point to remember is that whatever the case, the Pan and Zoom workspace is not referencing what is seen on the Timeline, but is instead referencing back to the original at the hard drive save location.
An alternative to all of this includes
Bringing you image into the project with the Default Scale to Frame Size disabled in preference. Then the 4000 x 3000 will overflow the space in the 1920 x 1080 monitor. You would then ignore what you see in the Premiere Elements workspace, select the Pan and Zoom Tool to open the Pan and Zoom workspace, and do your pans and zooms on the image that you see there. Click Done when finished. Back in the Premiere Elements workspace render the Timeline and scale what you see in the Edit Mode monitor as needed.
You also might want to look at beforehand cropping your 4000 x 3000 4:3 to 2200 x 1238 pixels 16:9 and using that as your source media with or without the Default Scale to Frame Size enabled.
Please view to see if the previews look any better and/or there are improvements in the export.
Thanks.
ATR

How to export a short film made with still images without loosing quality?

Hi,
I have been trying everything to make a short film, which is made with still images, to look decent once exported however it is a real challenge. Here are the steps I have undertaken:
1- I prepare the photographs and give them the aspect ration of 720p and whatever height as I try not to crop them too much at 300dpi. They look great in photoshop or capture one. I then save them as.tiff. All the images are RGB.
2- I start a new project in premiere pro cs4 and make it DV Pal 25fps.
3-I import the images and place them on the timeline. If they are a bit too big I rescale them. The images seem to look ok on the timeline although I seem to have lost the deepness of the colours.
4-I render the work area
5-I export it as quicktime, dv pal, quality 100.
My dilemna is that although exporting with quicktime, dv pal, quality 100 seems to give me the best quality compared to using quicktime animation, mpeg2, cinemak, avi..., the images are still not as sharp as in Photoshop and the colours look a lot paler and washed out. Also, when looking close to the screens you can see tiny squares on the images although from distance it's not too bad. When I view it from the exported file using Nero it's not too bad although definitely not perfect, as soon as I try to make a DVD and import it in Adobe Encore CS4 or send it by Dynamic Link, the quality looks horrible with images that look soft if not blurred and completely washed out.
I have now tried about t bu15 versions to see what 's the best I still have not reached the optimum quality and since these will be shown on big tvs or projected onto screens I need to nail it.
Would anybody have any advice please please please?
Many Thanks

My overall advice is to do that kind of work in an application that is designed for that. Give Photodex Proshow Producer trial a crack at it. I do a lot of work with stills, and that IMO PSP is the best approach. If you are intermixing the odd still, Pr may get you by. If you plan on doing a lot of that, try proshow, where the workflow and extensive features are designed for making high quality videos from stills that can be output to a wide number of formats and destinations, including color management with many of them( including avi). And, no need to resize. I know this won't solve your present problem.
Obviously, your attempt in Pr has not worked out as you had hoped. Maybe a bit more info would help. How are you rescaling them in Pr? That might well account for some quality loss. What is the original format and size of the images? What color management are you using in PS? Are you using any color correction or effects in Pr? Is your project interlaced or progressive?
From your description, you are not even getting the quality you should be getting from Pr IMO, though as Jim says, it is video and it will never look as pristine as it does in PS, but it still seems to me that something you are doing has degraded the work more than normally would be expected.

Can't select "Variable Speed" for Still Image Motion

I am using FCP 5.1 to add motion to still images. I've placed my still images on the timeline and added the appropriate keyframes in the Motion tab of the Viewer to Scale, Rotate, and move the stills on screen to my liking. But the speed is locked to "Constant," and I want to change that.
Specifically, am rolling a still image on-screen, freezing it in the middle of the screen a few seconds, and then rolling it off-screen. Doing this is easy: I just add a keyframe and type in the off-screen coordinates, then add another keyframe and type in coordinates somewhere on screen. But I want to vary the speed that the image rolls on-screen, so it moves on-screen quickly but then gradually slows down until it finally stops (freezes) in the middle of the screen.
Unfortunately, the "Setting" popup menu under "Time Remap" in the Motion tab of the viewer is grayed out and locked to "Constant Speed" (and yes, my still image clip is indeed selected and being displayed in the view). I cannot figure out how to unlock that popup so I can select variable speed.
I can choose Variable or Constant speed just fine for any imported "video" clips -- only still images are locked to Constant for some reason. Is this just a feature limitation of FCP 5? Any ideas would be appreciated.
Many thanks.

Why so much sarcasm in this FCP forum, Studio X?
Yes, it was in the manual, which by the way is quite large. And I didn't say how long it took me to spot that in the manual either -- a long time. I didn't spot it the first time I had read through that section (yes, I had read it before). And the fact is, you didn't know it either, otherwise you may have cared to point it out (for not only myself, but for others reading this forum too).
I participate in numerous other forums on other sites. Many times, people ask questions that are very simplistic to me -- I know the answers and I know those people putting forth the questions could easily have looked up the answer. Nevertheless, I take time to be helpful to others. For truly, some day I may be in their shoes, lacking time to read every part of every manual out there.
I am therefore thankful to those who likewise respond in a tactful manner to my queries, with the productive aim of helping others rather than condemning them. Thank you, David Harbsmeier, for being consistently positive and very helpful in this forum!

Changing rate of zoom motion for still image?

Hey everyone,
I'm working on a short documentary and have a large still image I am zooming out of with the motion tab, setting 2 key frames for zoom and center point at beginning and end.
The rate of the zoom goes slow at first and then speeds up more and more as it goes along, and it's going so fast by the end that you can't see the whole image. So I'm wondering how I can give it an even rate of zoom out, or at least slowing it down at the end.
I tried adding another zoom key frame, but couldn't find where the center point key frame was supposed to be, so it wound up changing it's directory a bit at that point.
There's got to be a way to do this. Thanks again!

Yeah, FC doesn't handle this real well. Using the Ease in sometimes works, but I've found that instead of easing in, it sort of adjusts (subtly) the position of the photo.
What I've done in the past is adjust the speed of the photo "clip" to run longer, so the zoom is slower.
I've also thought the original file size of the photo made a difference, a larger file seems to not have this problem as bad, though I have NOT tested this. For me, this seemed to happen when using smaller files. My PS files are around 30MB each! Yes, lots of rendering when doing anything to them, but that does work.
Jonathan

Format for still images

I recently made a slideshow in FCE, some of the images appeared stretched on my widescreen TV. What format should I use in the easy set up. A couple months ago I made a slide show and the still images looked fine on widescreen, but forgot how I did this. Thanks

Your widescreen TV should have an aspect control which you can set for 4:3 presentations.

Adjusting time for still images

Is there an easy way to import a series of still images into the timeline and make them all display for the same duration? OR does the time need to be adjusted on each individually?
Thanks.

Changing the default still duration only changes the duration of the master clips that imported to the project. You would have to re-import all the still after changing the default duration for this to work.
However, if you drop a bazillion stills into a timeline, you can select them all and choose a new duration, it will be applied to all of them, provided they all start out at the same duration.
Hope this helps -
Max Average

How can I get still images without blurring?

Hi,
I've found several threads on this topic. But none of them helped. Most discussions justs ended without resolution. Some had a lot of technical questions and details that I didn't understand.
Can someone please tell me how to do the following...
Add a still picture. In fact, that's all I have now -- no movie, just one still picture.
Play the picture in the timeline or in the event window without blurring.
If I need to prepare the image first, please tell me exactly what to do. I have Photoshop. I fooled around with increasing the resolution by a lot, and that did help some.
The picture in this case is a screen capture of a window with text in it.
My purpose is to make an animated Christmas card to be sent via email and watched on whatever monitor a person might have.
Thanks a lot for any help!

I found the answer in this thread -- "https://discussions.apple.com/thread/3775900?start=0&tstart=0"
The method for finding it was this Google search:
site:discussions.apple.com fcpx blurred
It would be nice if somehow all the relevant threads could be made available when needed. The "More Like This" window is pretty useless -- it doesn't restrict itself to the community.
The answer (copied from the above thread):
Go to:
Preferences -> Playback -> Playback Quality and select "High Quality"

Image size for still images

I've got a bunch of 300DPI 8x10 inch images I want to put into iMovie.
Do I need to reduce file size or will iMovie reduce the size automaticlly?
What is the smallest DPI I can use and still have a good image on a 9foot by 12 foot screen.
Thanks.

Hi Dennis:
Look here for a full discussion on the issue:
http://discussions.apple.com/message.jspa?messageID=961029&ft=y&#961029

Looking for still image content

I'm currently in the process of making a spec or pre-vis for a music video. It's highly conceptual, so getting the right visuals to match the lyric content is very important.
I'm off to a decent start finding things through google images, but if anyone has every used google images, it's AWFUL! A simple search like "americana" or even "american indians" constantly get horrible results. Maybe one good image out of 12 pages and there are so many non-related images it's ridiculous.
Does anyone know of other image searching sites or stock photos? Since this is the pre-vis, we dont have a budget yet, so professional stock photos are out. But in order to sell it, we need good, dramatic, related photos. Any ideas?
Thanks everyone

Hi there,
You might find iStockphoto.com a better/less expensive way to find quality images.
http://istockphoto.com/index.php?refnum=JonasEriksson
You can download free comping images, albeit slightly small and watermarked - but still quite good, especially for SD productions. Just remember to buy the images if you release commercially - they are still very cheap compared to Getty & Co.
Good luck and maybe we will see you final result somewhere - keep us posted!
Jonas

How do you fix playback quality for still image video on Adobe Premiere Elements 10?

Hi there, I'm a new editor, and am still wanting to make my first awesome video. I find that when I do a still motion video all quality is very bad, and a little blurry. I asked that question and someone told me to fix the playback quality and I do not know how to fix that. If you can answer my question, please also give me the instructions too.

First, read these...
Photo Scaling for Video http://forums.adobe.com/thread/450798
-Too Large May = Crash http://forums.adobe.com/thread/879967
-And another crash report http://forums.adobe.com/thread/973935

Premiere 9.0 locks source files for still images and title background

I am using Adobe Premiere 9.0
In this version - I hjave used two previous - I have problem while uppdating images inserted in timeline and backgrounds of titles. While editing them in Photoshop I get a file lock error. Either i have to:
Close Premiere, edit file and then restart
Last time I did this I had problem to get image updated within Premiere. It still showed wrong image in timeline and while rendering but image gallery showed right image
or I have to save to a new filename and then insert image/background once again in timeline/title (that takes some time - pew!)
I had the same problem in three different installations of my laptop and two different hardwares. Last laptop and installation is about two weeks old. It is a brand new Dell with WIndows XP. Adobe Premiere 9.0. All sourcefiles is on my own harddrive - nothing on the netdrives.
Any ideas?

Abotu operating system - I am in the hands of IT dept
They are planning upgrading to Windows 7. But not within the timeframe of current projects.
The image imitation I wasn´t aware of. Is that a definied/stated limitation in Adobe Premiere? To me the intuitive image size while working with 1920 x 1080 screen is making images in same size.
The laptop is completely new. I am definitely sure about a non-defraged-disc. 92 GB used 306 GB free.
It dept say the hardware should be sufficient. Even the earlier laptop they tried to get working had enough capacity due to the stated demands Adobe have.
Intel(R) Core(TM)
i7-3520N CPU, @2.90GH
2,89 Ghz, 3.41 GB RAM
PAE (Physical Adress extension)
4 GM memory,

Alphanumeric for still images without rearranging ....

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for