Any status change on Entourage attchment corruption??
Like many others, I ran into a problem with sending email attachments using Entourage when Tiger first came out... I haven't heard anything in a while about that topic... I did a quick search and didn't see any recent, pertinent posts... Does anyone know whether there has been any fix to this problem??? I see that a new service pack is now out related to Microsoft Office 2004 but I didn't see in the release notes any mention of this issue... I sent an attachment successfully to myself at work recently but that doesn't mean much as some times attachments would get through and some times not... I haven't yet had time to do a more extensive test... Anyone know the current status of this problem??? thanks....
Robert,
I think that this problem was traced to an interaction with another application or background process. My colleagues and I are heavy users of Entourage 2004 and Tiger and never experienced any problems with attachments.
bd
Similar Messages
-
E-Recruiting:Status change Activities on screen
Dear Experts,
I need to understand a few things about performing activities on candidacies(Object NE) . Please help me out in the following queries :
We are implementing eRecruiting 603,specifically succession planning.
I have created some custom activities (of type status change) & assigned them to some cutom created processes.
In the BSP page, the list of candidacies NE for each NB is shown.
The various processes (custom as well as standard) are also shown on the screen as different tabs.
I have one Z activity Assigned to object status "intended as successor" and another assigned to status " rejected".
1) To begin with all the NEs are shown in the ALL tab.If i perform any status change activity(intended as successor or rejected), the NE completely disppears from the screen (even from tab ALL) . Is this the standard expected behaviour ? There is a Process called "Rejection".But the Rejected NE is not shown in this tab. Is there any way i can show the NE under the Rejection tab? The same happens for status "intended as successor".
2)Is this how all the status-change activities behave on screen? The NE is not shown on the screen but the changed status is reflected in the table 5139
3)At the end of the process,for a NB,how can a succession planner see the NEs with status "intended as successor" if the NEs disappear from screen on performing this activity.
Any assistance and thoughts on this will be invaluable.
Many thanks,
SowmyaHello Sowmya,
I think the SAP customizing mght tricked you a bit. The status of the candidacy which you set with the status changing activity has nothing to do with the tabs in the screen you are talking of.
The Tabs result from the processes (or process steps - wording is not very clear here). Either you see all processes that are assigned to recruiting or succ planning or if you have assigned a recruiting plan to the requisition you will have tabs for each process(step) for which are activities in the recruiting plan.
The candidacy is counted on the tab in which its most recent activity is in. So the status change activity rejected and the process rejected have nothing to do with each other directly. Only if it is the most recent activity of the candidacy and it belongs to the process reject the candidacy will be counted on the tab.
If the candidacy disappears at all this results from the filters you set in the upper area of the screen. In the recruiting candidacy list the default filter restricts the candidacies shown to "in process" that might be the reason why the candidacies disappear after status change.
Best Regards
Roman Weise -
Status and Tracking: Lock Function overide due to status change?
Hello experts,
Does anybody know whether it is standard functionality that a user with only R_STS_PT authorisation can unlock his/her planning by changing the status to "in process"?
Should it not be the case that I higher hierarchy node or someone with R_STS_SUP authorisation must first unlock the plannig before for somone with only R_STS_PT authorasation can perform any status change? I am currently unsure whether what we are observing is a feature or a bug which we had previously not noticed.
Thanks in advance,
WillHi William,
Persons responsible for executing the planning process i.e. the User (Auth: R_STS_PT) are assigned to an area of responsibility (hierarchy node) within a subplan. They are either assigned to their own area of responsibility directly or are assigned as a substitute. The person responsible uses the STS, firstly to jump to his or her planning application, secondly to set the status of his or her own planning, and thirdly to monitor and set the status of any people who may be assigned under them.
For example, the person responsible for node 11 of the subplan u201Ccost center planningu201C logs on to planning session 1 in the STS. In this way he or she can obtain the detailed view for his or her cost center.
Auth: R_STS_SUP is for Planning Coordinators for monitoring the entire planning process and thus have special access rights. So R_STS_PT & R_STS_SUP are the same, except that you are only allowed to set certain statuses of a task on the basis of the hierarchy levelto which you are assigned (this means, whether you are executing (R_STS_PT) or supervising a particular planning task (R_STS_SUP))
Manoj -
after restoration of files via time capsule my status changed to "Guest" and I can't find the pass word for changing it back to Registered user. Any Help?
Hey mate I had this same problem exept instead of my recording disappearing my Chorus that went for 8 bars extended out to 20 bars lol and I used auto tune on it and it sounds like t-pain on a very bad day so it sounds like it does a few things when it comes up that error
-
Service Desk Settings, Automatic Email at status change of messages
Hello experts,
I need your help about this:
I am configuring Service Desk Specific Scenario Settings -> Automatic Email at status change.
I made the configuration suggested as described SAP Note 691303. Also I configured the status profile SLFN0001 in transaction DNO_CUST01, and the Action profile SLFN0001_STANDARD, both for the SLF1 (Service basis message), but still when we change the status of messages, the email is not generated in SCOT, overview of send orders.
I want to clarify that the configuration made for the action of send email was in transsaction SPPFCADM, selected DNO_NOTIF, and push Define Action Profile and Actions, then selected the Action profile SLFN0001_STANDARD for making he ocnfiguration as suggested in note 691303.
SCOT is correctly configured and working OK.
Business partners emails are mantained too.
Thank you very much.
Hector LongarteHello. Thanks to all of you for your comments. I am answering to your questions below:
Have you assign proper partner function to every status in action?
I do not know where can I make this assigment. I am thinking that this may be the cause. Please I kindly ask you to give me orientation about this.
Have you defined condition for defined action?
Yes, the condition was defined thru SPPFCADM. Now, I wonder if this must be configured for CRM_ORDER application as described in note 691303, or for DNO_NOTIF ??
Have you maintained user deatils on identification tab in BP?
Yes, the Business partners and emails adresses were correctly mantained.
The configuration we are talking about and you want to change, is it regarding SLFN (Service Desk Messages) or SLF1 (Basis Service Message)?
I supose that for Service desk messages we must configure SLFN, and not SLF1. Right?
In DNO_CUST01, we have SLF1. We have not made any configuration in DNO_CUST04, it is still as original standard. Please let me know if we are right.
You want to send an aut. email notification when status of SLF1 changes?
We want to send email notifications to the message creator about the status change of service desk messages.
Thank you very much.
Best regards.
Hector Longarte. -
Question over the appraisal status change
Dear All,
Our appraisal has ( following the flexible template ) has planning, mid year review and final phases. With in each main status we have sub status configured. Example - In the planning stage ( say in the month of February ) , employee add objectives, change weights etc and send to manager for approval. If manager approves, the document status will be changed from planning to mid year status and employee's form is changed to the display mode ( so he cannot update objectives / weight etc)
Then again in the mid year status ( say a few months later - June ist ), the employee needs to review the appraisal, add or update the objectives etc and submit for manager approval.
My issue is - After the employee's appraisal form is changed to display only from planning to review status - How the employee's appraisal form can be changed from a read only to change mode in the same status ? As it is necessary for employee to add/ update in the form.
I am seeking the best approaches for the below as I am considering two options ( as mentioned below )
1) For the mid year status , I will configure a sub status ( called start mid year ) and attach a push button. The employee select the push button during the mid year period ( say June 1st ) and this push button triggers the status change from Mid year to Mid Year / Start Mid year. We also plan to apply a custom implementation for BADI for column access and badi (HRHAP00_COL_ACCESS) will decide the access control for columns etc.
2) The other approach I am considering is we are considering a workflow (INFO_APPRAISEE_CHANGE_REVIEW ) to notify th employee 7 days before the mid year review starts. Can this workflow trigger the status change or read the column access from the BADI (HRHAP00_COL_ACCESS) ?
Any other simpler approaches ?
I saw in the Process config ( tabs and process ) that we can define the phase with dates and status / substatus etc. Can this be useful for the above scenario. For eg. On June 1st when the mid year review start, can the status be changed like from Mid year to Mid Year / Start Mid year ?
Please let me know . Greatly Appreciated!
Aneez HameedHi Aneez, both options are great, HRHAP00_COL_ACCESS is configurable at each sub-status, so you have many options. You can have the manager "approve" at beginning of year, but keep it in "in planning" by having a 3rd sub-status.
You can have the employee or manager have access to the pushbutton so that mid-term can start.
you can also do a workflow option where it is changed automatically, your option 2.
the final option is the HR adminstrator can change the status, by doing a mass select in phap_admin and then they change to the status to move it to "in review" with all of your mid-term substatuses.
they key to making this work is the additional config that goes along with HRHAP00_COL_ACCESS. here you will want to do define a Z table with the following columns:
object id - your template ID
role - which are the same roles values defined at your template - apee for apraisee
template status - integer - represents status ID
template sub-status - ID
column id - FAPP, OBJO, etc..
availability indicator (char) - here you will configure H, X etc... which the badi uses to know how to handle it.
best regards - michael -
Picking status change in Outbound delivery
Hi All,
I have to create a start condition in PPF actions, whihc is nothing but BADI... whihc will trigger when the Pcikinf status is changed....
I have these threee condtions:
Action will be triggered by outbound delivery order status change:
1. Picking planned status at header level changed after warehouse order creation/cancellation (corresponds to Focus2 status 0 u2013 Forecast);:
u2022 from u201CNot startedu201D to u201CCompletedu201D and back from u201CNot startedu201D to u201CPartially completedu201D and back ;
u2022 from u201CPartially completedu201D to u201CCompletedu201D and back;
2. Picking status changed at header level after execution each of warehouse order in drop location (corresponds to Focus2 status 1 - BeginPicked);
u2022 from u201CNot startedu201D to u201CPartially completedu201D and back;
3. Picking status changed at header level after execution of last warehouse order in drop location (corresponds to Focus2 status 2 - Picked):
u2022 from u201CNot startedu201D to u201CCompletedu201D and back;
u2022 from u201CPartially completedu201D to u201CCompletedu201D and back;
any help????
I want to know how can i code this??Hi,
In the BADI, you can get reference to Delivey Object
lo_dlv_ppf TYPE REF TO /scdl/cl_dlv_ppf.
lo_prd TYPE REF TO /scwm/cl_dlv_management_prd.
get delivery reference
lo_dlv_ppf ?= io_context->appl.
Get the attributes DOCID, the find the status of the documents accordingly.
Now get the instance of the Delivery management:
lo_prd = /scwm/cl_dlv_management_prd=>get_instance( ).
Then read Delivery header and items using the below method based on DOCID:
APPEND is_docid TO lt_docid.
ls_include_data-HEAD_PARTYLOC = abap_true.
ls_include_data-HEAD_DATE = abap_true.
ls_include_data-HEAD_TRANSPORT = abap_true.
ls_include_data-ITEM_DATE = abap_true.
ls_read_options-data_retrival_only = abap_true.
ls_read_options-mix_in_object_instances = abap_true.
CALL METHOD lo_prd->query
EXPORTING
it_docid = lt_docid
iv_doccat = is_docid-doccat
is_read_options = ls_read_options
is_include_data = ls_include_data
IMPORTING
et_headers = lt_whr_headers
et_items = lt_whr_items.
You can find header status in lt_wr_headers.
Or based on DOCID, get status from table /SCDL/DB_STATUS.
Hope that helps
Vinod. -
Status change from 'Completed' to 'In Process' not allowed
When configuring Appraisals in R/3 we want to change the Status of 'Completed' when pressing the 'Reject' button so that it moves to the Target Status of 'In Process'
However, we are getting an error message:
Status change from 'Completed' to 'In Process' not allowed
The SAP help states the following:
In Process (only if final appraisal or part appraisal is defined)
This has been defined at Template Level.
So I don't understand why we are getting the message.
Does any one else know of a way to configure the Appraisal template so that after it has been 'Rejected' it moves back into 'In Process'
Thanks
MN
Points Rewards!Hello Andreas,
Ah, sorry, there was so much talk about user decisions that I assumed you were using a standard decision task.
Still, I would be extra careful of changing the way workflow usually works because you have an unknown target audience that are based on the standard.
The standard SAP philosophy is quite simple: cancel/F3 or do nothing and it stays reserved. If you do not want it reserved, you need to perform an action. This is based on a majority of processes: in most cases when you execute a work item you will also be the one who is going to completed it. Replacing it is the lesser used of the two alternatives, therefore it is the only one that requires an action on the part of the user.
Again, this is intended as constructive input. Strange quirks and unusual behaviour tend to add a black mark to software if they do not make things easier to use. In many environments users are not even aware of the reserve/replace business, so there you would be adding an additional layer of complexity.
Personally I would find an exit popup annoying as a regular workflow user - regular decisions can be approved with one click, or I can back out with a single click if I need to make a phone call or look up some info before approving - but with this new-fangled thing I've got an extra button to click and an extra thing to think about. This is especially the case in a payment approval scenario where you may have users in some departments who may approve hundreds of payments each week.
My suggestion would be to leave it like that. By all means put an option into the user decision to put it back or to 'un-reserve' it (and loop round if the user chooses it). That way you are adding value and not clicks.
Cheers,
Mike -
How can I hide a contact's status changes?
It is a pain to scroll through the history of a conversation with all of the status changes mixed in with my conversations. Is there a way to suppress seeing these? It seems like I could hide these several years ago (perhaps with the older version of Chax) but I can no longer find this option anywhere.
Hi,
I have Chax 2.2.2 used with my iChat 4 computer
In the tab "Notifications" it does have a box that Needs Ticking to Show the Status changes in Messages. (I have not tried Setting it and then Unticking it to see if that works - sort of in reverse)
I also don't remember using it before to Set this.
I consider several of the Chax settings to mimic the same thing iChat 4 already does.
These maybe an hangover from previous version though.
Having said that their Site suggests using the correct version for the OS/iChat version you are using suggesting they were created from the Ground up or very close to it for each version of iChat
I have not seen anything on removing the Message's Notifications.
9:05 PM Friday; March 18, 2011
Please, if posting Logs, do not post any Log info after the line "Binary Images for iChat" -
Hi,
I have received this trap from the Call Manager PUB server running version 7.1.5.31900-3
hwStringMatch - cmaidad[5579]: Physical Drive Status Change: Slot 1 Port 2l Box 1 Bay 1. Status is now Predictive Failure
I have checked the drive status via CLI and all drives show OK, both physical & logical
Is there anywhere you can check what is causing this event and is it merely advising of a potential drive failureHi
Modern drives have embedded monitoring. Whilst the disk hasn't failed, something internally is telling the embedded monitoring that it may soon fail - it's running a little hot, having excessive write errors, latency is drifting up... something subtle is going wrong.
It could be caused by a firmware error... but I'd take it at face value.
It might have failed by the time you read this, or it might work fine for another 20 years.
Either way - when I was a server admin I would get any disk with a predictive failure swapped out immediately. No point waiting for it to fail - even on a RAID system when a disk fails although you don't lose data you have your trousers down as a coincidental second failure would ruin your day!
Regards
Aaron -
EXIT/ BADI/ Enhancement point for User Status change in Order
Hi all,
I am looking for an EXIT or a BADI or an enhancement point specifically for user status change in an order thru IW31/IW32.
I have the exit names for Order PBO, PAI, 'SAVE' event etc. so m not looking for generic answers.
I have to put some validations for the Order on USER STATUS CHANGE. Let me know if any of u have any pointers on that.
Thanks and Regards,
SonalHi,
Use this Enhancement IWO10009 and call these function module to change the User Status
STATUS_TEXT_EDIT --> To Read the existing status.
STATUS_CHANGE_INTERN_VB --> to change the status.
Regards,
Satish -
Error "Status change from READY to COMMITTED is not allowed"
Dear experts,
once again SAPs workflow environment drives me crazy with mysterious error messages.
Some time ago I posted a question here concerning the problem that I cannot put back a workitem by using function module SAP_WAPI_PUT_BACK_WORKITEM due to a lock on this workitem which has been set right after it has been double clicked in the business workplace workflow inbox:
[How can I put back a workitem before I'm back in the business workplace?;
Since I do not want to dequeue the lock for the workitem in my application (where the user finds the appropriate detail information along with the function buttons for approval, rejection and F3/BACK) I tried it with calling a POPUP_TO_CONFIRM ("Do you want to put back the workitem?") directly from within the BO-method, right after returning from the FM that called my application. From here (the popup then shows in front of the business workplace instead of the application) the locking doesn't seem to be a problem any more! But whatever I do after the users decision to put the WI back - calling the FM SAP_WAPI_PUT_BACK_WORKITEM or trying to leave the method with macro EXIT_CANCELLED - leads to the error message "Status change from READY to COMMITTED is not allowed" and the workitem changes to status ERROR, too. This message seems to be bull***t, since the status of the item is supposed to go back to READY.
Does anybody have experience to help me on that ?
Thanks in advance
regards
AndreasHello Andreas,
Ah, sorry, there was so much talk about user decisions that I assumed you were using a standard decision task.
Still, I would be extra careful of changing the way workflow usually works because you have an unknown target audience that are based on the standard.
The standard SAP philosophy is quite simple: cancel/F3 or do nothing and it stays reserved. If you do not want it reserved, you need to perform an action. This is based on a majority of processes: in most cases when you execute a work item you will also be the one who is going to completed it. Replacing it is the lesser used of the two alternatives, therefore it is the only one that requires an action on the part of the user.
Again, this is intended as constructive input. Strange quirks and unusual behaviour tend to add a black mark to software if they do not make things easier to use. In many environments users are not even aware of the reserve/replace business, so there you would be adding an additional layer of complexity.
Personally I would find an exit popup annoying as a regular workflow user - regular decisions can be approved with one click, or I can back out with a single click if I need to make a phone call or look up some info before approving - but with this new-fangled thing I've got an extra button to click and an extra thing to think about. This is especially the case in a payment approval scenario where you may have users in some departments who may approve hundreds of payments each week.
My suggestion would be to leave it like that. By all means put an option into the user decision to put it back or to 'un-reserve' it (and loop round if the user chooses it). That way you are adding value and not clicks.
Cheers,
Mike -
Report of List of all status changes for various production orders at a tim
Hi,
Can I have a standard report which shows the dates of each and every status (user & system) of a production order.
I need to have a report for a list of productio orders at a time.
If we go to CO03, header menu, status changes option is there, but it only caters for single production order.
Table JCDS is available to know the dates but I need a standard one rather than a Z development.
Or you can guide me any function module.
Thanks,
KumarHello,
You will get the details of status in following table.
JEST - for object status
JSTO - Status Profile
TJ02T - to Decode the status Number
as the status data you will get from JEST is in very typical form you have to use TJ02T to find the exact status
AM -
Process flow for the Mid-year Status Changes based upon the Qualifying Even
Hi Experts,
I'm looking some information for the process flow for the Mid-year Status Changes based upon the Qualifying Events. Basically, I need to know, what would be the impact of these changes on various info types (Via IT0014 - Deduction changes & so forth) and the things that needs to be considered during it's Configuration and the things that needs to be checked due to the occurrence of the change. I would greatly appreciate any kind of help/document.
Thanks a bunch in advance,
Thanks,
Exertive.Hello guys,
Can anyone has any kind of input on this? Basically, I need to know the procees for Mid-year status changes based upon Qualified events. Any kind of help is greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Exertive. -
User Status change problem in Process Order
Hi,
We are in process of upgrading our system from 4.6C to ECC 6.0. I have a problem with User status change for process Orders.
In 4.6C we are using the profile x with settings:
10 ZNEW Created process order 10 90 1 1 ZSTA
20 ZLCK Locked process order 20 90 1 1 ZREV
30 ZOPN Reopened process order 20 90 1 1 ZOPN
40 ZMST MES order started 20 90 1 1 ZMST
50 ZMCL MES order closed 20 90 1 1 ZMCL
90 ZTEC Technically completed 20 90 1 1 ZTEC
In ECC 6.0 we also use the same profile settings as above.
The problem is in ECC 6.0 when I do a goods receipt the User status changes to ZTEC . The process followed is ..Create process order, Release Order, Goods issue, Phase partuial confirmations, Goods receipt and then Finla confirmations of phases. Now in 4.6C if i do the above process the User status remains at ZMST and it only changes to ZTEC when i technically complete the order but in ECC 6.0 when I do a goods recipt from above steps the User status changes to ZTEC. THis should not happen.
Any pointers will be very helpful.Hi,
The log for production order preliminiary costing is not saved. Therefore, once the order is saved, there is no log available anymore (this is by the way a question of PP; none of the logs is saved).
Hope that helps...
Regards,
Declan
Maybe you are looking for
-
Magic Mouse under Win7 - full functionalities
Dear all, I don't have a choice - my company runs Win7. Nevertheless, I don't want to miss my Magic Mouse and my Apple Keyboard that I know from my home devices. To connect the Mouse with my Dell Nogebook hasn't been a challenge but, I miss functiona
-
Series in A/P invoice and PO
Dear Experts There one trivial issue that has been pegging me for long. I want to know what does the series vi. PO,SO,OB stand for??? In particular what is OB???? any major impact in the system if we select any of these??? Thanks REgards Shyam
-
Can't get parameter in struts when using input type="file"...?
Hi everyone: Can the common html tag and struts tag be used together?I have an example:in jsp <html:form method="post" action="sendmail.do" enctype="multipart/form-data"> <tr><td>MailTo:</td><td> <html:text property="mailto"/></td></tr> <tr><td>MailF
-
I reported my iphone stolen this past weekend on july 27 2013.Recovering it looks like a slim chace. I looked on craigslist in the lost and found and found many ads to buy iphones any condition, sell iphones etc..and jailbreak any iphone. This makes
-
Prints and SoftProofs from Aperture and PS look different?
I'm using the HP Designjet 90 and there is something strange. There is significant difference between soft-proof in Aperture and PS of the same image (exported as .psd from Aperture). In Aperture the image has some blue/cyan cast and there is no such