Appraisal Document: Wrong entries in action log
Hi Gurus,
For some appraisal documents, the action log is getting wrong entries.
For example, it appears several entries. Those entries identify persons that have seen the document. I have an example that several employees have seen the same document at the same day the same time, which has not happened.
I am using standard implementation for action log.
I cannot find a pattern for that...
Have you faced the same situation? Can you help me, please?
Many thanks,
Vasco Brandã
Hi Vasco,
Another customer had some problems with the log and it was solved with note 1476829 (it corrected a different issue but it made changes on the log fucntionality as well).
Try this note and if you still have problem after that then I suggest you open a message for this as it might be a bug.
Cheers
Sarah
Similar Messages
-
Is it possible to remove an action log entry from a ticket?
Hello.
Is it possible to remove an actoin log entry from a ticket. We may run into a situation when confidential data has been pasted into the action log.
Thank you,
RichardYes, but not through the UI. the easiest way to do this would be with
SMLets.
Import-Module SMLets
$IRClass = Get-scsmclass Workitem.Incident$
$SRClass = Get-SCSMClass Workitem.ServiceRequest$
$ActLogRelationshipClass = get-scsmrelationshipclass System.WorkItem.TroubleTicketHasActionLog
$IR = Get-SCSMObject -Class $IRClass -Filter "Name -eq 'IR21'"
$ActionLogs = Get-SCSMRelatedObject -SMObject $IR -Relationship $ActLogRelationshipClass
Foreach ($ActionLog in $ActionLogs) {
if ( $ActionLog.Description -match "TEST") {
Remove-SCSMObject $ActionLog -Force -WhatIf
It should be noted that this will not remove the action log form the data warehouse. there isn't a supported method to edit data in the DW, so you're kinda on your own if you need to remove this data from the historical records -
No change documents exist in action log @ PM order
I have created Z order type copying PM01 , when I am testing this for action loge it is giving message No change documents exist
Am I missing some config ?Make sure you have activated change documents for the order type /plant combination under SPRO > PM > Maintenance and service processing > Orders > Settings for order type > Define change documents.
Regards
Narasimhan -
Creating action log entry for incident via SDK in C#
Hi,
Does anyone have any example code, or pointer to, of how to add an action log entry (with icon) to an incident? I can't work out what the target for the relationship should be or how to configure it...
With Thanks,
RobAnton,
Thanks for your response! I think the problem may be in how I'm creating "WorkItemMP". In the method below I'm trying to pass in an issue Id parameter to add an action log item to an Issue.
How are you creating the "WorkItemMP"?
public
void
UpdateActionLog(string
nsId)
EnterpriseManagementGroup
emg1 = new
EnterpriseManagementGroup("server01.xyx.com"
ManagementPackClass
classIncident = emg1.EntityTypes.GetClass(new
Guid(SYSTEM_WORKITEM_INCIDENT_CLASSS));
// A604B942-4C7B-2FB2-28DC-61DC6F465C68
EnterpriseManagementObjectProjection
incidentProjection = new
EnterpriseManagementObjectProjection
(emg1, classIncident);
ManagementPack
WorkItemMP = emg1.ManagementPacks.GetManagementPack(new
Guid("DD26C521-7C2D-58C0-0980-DAC2DACB0900"));
//System.WorkItem.Incident.Library MP
CreatableEnterpriseManagementObject
cemoIncident = new
CreatableEnterpriseManagementObject(emg1,
classIncident);
cemoIncident[classIncident,
"Id"
].Value = nsId;
ManagementPackClass
typeActionLog = emg1.EntityTypes.GetClass("System.WorkItem.TroubleTicket.ActionLog"
, WorkItemMP);
CreatableEnterpriseManagementObject
objectActionLog = new
CreatableEnterpriseManagementObject
(emg1, typeActionLog);
objectActionLog[typeActionLog,
"Id"].Value
= Guid
.NewGuid().ToString();
objectActionLog[typeActionLog,
"Description"].Value
= "Incident updated via SDK.\n"
objectActionLog[typeActionLog,
"Title"].Value
= "Incident updated via SDK"
objectActionLog[typeActionLog,
"EnteredBy"].Value
= "Administrator"
objectActionLog[typeActionLog,
"EnteredDate"].Value
= DateTime
.Now.ToUniversalTime();
ManagementPackEnumeration
enumeration6 = WorkItemMP.GetEnumerations().GetItem("System.WorkItem.ActionLogEnum.TaskExecuted"
objectActionLog[typeActionLog,
"ActionType"
].Value = enumeration6.Id;
ManagementPackRelationship
relationship2 = emg1.EntityTypes.GetRelationshipClass("System.WorkItem.TroubleTicketHasActionLog"
, WorkItemMP);
if
(incidentProjection != null
incidentProjection.Add(objectActionLog, relationship2.Target);
incidentProjection.Commit(); -
Firefighter Log Report-Wrong entries being shown
Hi all,
using SAP FF rel. 5.2 - VIRSANH 520_620 I encountered the same issues
described in notes n°:
- 1064911 Firefighter Log Report-Wrong entries being shown
- 1152284 Firefighter Log Report-Wrong entries being shown with
dates
The solutions described in these notes are not valid for my SAP
release:
VIRSANH 520_620
Does someone know if are available the same corrections for my SAP FF Rel.?
Thanks in advance,
Claudio OrsiHi Claudio,
Not sure if this helps any....
We recently upgraded FF 5.2 (520_620) to current SP levels and experienced some issues with the reporting feature
We utilize the reports through the NetWeaver interface and were not receiving correct results; this happened after we went from SP 3 to SP 4
We have backed out the SP4 level to get back to "what was working"; we have an issue opened with SAP and they have identified our experience as a bug and plan on a fix with the next release scheduled for end of June
Are you experiencing report issues using the NetWeaver interface or the backend report tools? What is the SP level you are at?
This information on our experience may or may not be helpfull but anything can be of some value as long as it is mentioned
Jerry Synoga
Ryerson, Inc.
630-758-2021 -
How to trigger follow up processing actions in appraisal documents?
Hi gurus,
We are customizing the performance management process using Objective Settings and Appraisals (ECC 6.0; Enh.Pack 4, ESS/MSS with business pack 1.41) and we have customized the evaluation templates (transaction PHAP_CATALOG_PA) with the enhancement "Follow-Up Proc. (Background) - Adjust Qualific. (Start Date)" in Follow-up Processing section of the Processing tab, at template level (VA object).
The system functions is ok, and the cualification appears in the employee profile (transaction PPPM) correctly after the performance management especialist trigger it using the admin report (transaction PHAP_ADMIN_PA).
My question is: Is there anyway to automatically trigger the follow-up processing after the appraisal document is finished? Do we need to develop in ABAP a new implementation of some BADI?
Thanks in advance!Maurice Hagen wrote:
Followup processes are started as soon as the document goes from status 1-4 to 5 (completed).
Do you mean ALL available follow-up processes should be started as soon as status is set to "competed"?
That's not what happens for our (custom) appraisal: follow-up process(es) are not started when the status becomes "completed", neither from the backend nor the portal. We always have to manually launch the follow-up process from the phap_admin transaction, and select the ones we want to be done.
In phap_catalog, we have a couple of follow-up processes that are selected in the "Processing" tab.
when the approval process is activated (infty 5025) and or status 6,7,8,9 are selected then the follow up process only takes place after status change to close approved.
Even when setting the status to "closed approved", no follow-up process is started.
Any suggestion? Isn't there a setting somewhere that should be set in order for the follow-up prpcesses to be automatically started when the status is set to "completed"? -
Action Log Entry Private is "Blue" not ticked.
Hi Colleagues,
i have a question. Maybee i only didn`t see the awnser in the admin guide.
When you have a Action Log Comment sometimes the comment is not ticked as private it`s the field is "filed" out in blue.
What does this mean?Comments with this item checked will not show on the end user portal. since this is SQL bool under the covers, it has three possible values. TRUE (i.e. this comment should NOT be shown to user), FALSE (it's ok to show this to users) and NULL (?).
I believe, but can't confirm, that null comments are shown to users. -
Add "Further Participant" in PMP Appraisal Document
Dear experts,
I need to add "Further Participant" in PMP Appraisal Document but not directly/manually.
I am checking if there is any Function Module which I can use in Custom Report to add Further Participant to respective Appraisal Document.
I have tested FM "HRHAP_DOCUMENT_MODIFY" and passed the required input to it, however instead of adding given Further Participant to the document, this FM is deleting the particular document.
Any helpful suggestion would be highly regarded.
Regards,
SAP HR User.Hi,
The PMP process (the predefined) is not really ment to behave this way, I am not even sure if it includes further participants.
So I just assume you use the flexible one instead, from a program flow logic it will be the same anyway.
What you need to do is:
- Get Appraisal
- Add Further Participant
- Save
- Dequeue
So, assuming you have all the appraisal id's already available. Loop over the appriasal ID's and for each one do
HRHAP_DOCUMENT_GET_DETAIL, make sure your in admin mode and you need to decide if you want this registered in teh action log. But make sure your in admin mode!
You need to capture ALL export fields, we need them later on.
One of the exlporting parameters is T_HEADER_OTHERS. Add to this your further participant.
Then call HRHAP_DOCUMENT_SAVE
Then HRHAP_DOCUMENT_DEQUEUE
finished, next appraisal id.
Regards and Groetjes,
Maurice Hagen -
ESS EHP5: Appraisal document not working
Hi,
I am implementing performance appraisal (EHP5 and BP ESS 1.50) and am sorting out the very confusing scenario of EHP4 and EHP5 versions of appraisal documents. I am using the pmp version EHP5 and BP ESS 1.50 (BP ESS 1.41 not installed). I did basic setting in Object Setting and Apprsaisals (repla = X) and created a category and a basic template (Do I need to do this if I use the predefined version?).
But when I run the iViews, I got a system dump from the pmp version ...
Access via 'NULL' object reference not possible
Error Code: ICF-IE-http .....RABAX_STATE -e: OBJECTS_OBJREF_NOT_ASSIGNED_NO
I checked sap note 1319829 but our basis guy said we are ok with sap basis level (level 7)
... and this error from the flexible version:
The Web Dynpro application was called up with the wrong URL parameters
I checked some related notes about OBN configuration but they are only for EHP4. I've very little about EHP5. And from what i found, the EHP5 PMP version already takes care of OBN configuration in the iviews and launchpads.
BF and extension sets are all on as far as I can see.
My questions are: is BP ESS 1.4 needed to run appraisal for EHP5? Is Object setting configuration needed for EHP5 (predefined) which is abap based, since whe I tried the template (web layout), it shows BSP sicf bsp services not activated.
ThanksHi Luke
May i request your help on below issue (I hav already raised a thread with heading "Infotype 24 - Appraisal Document not visible for Appraisee - Urgent"
I have following scenario in PMS (not using Talent Management)
I am using Flexible PMS (Objective setting & Appraisals) with setting " HAP00 REPLA as A".
HR is triggering the template through PHAP_CREATE giving Appraisee, Appraiser and Reviewer.
After that, i am logging in through Appraisee id in the ECC and trying to see the document in Infotype 0024, tab (Appraisal where Appraisee / Appraiser)
but i am not able to see the document however i am able to see the document for Appraiser in Infotype 0024, tab (Appraisal where Appraiser) when logging in through appraisers id in ECC
May i request your expert opinion regarding the above mentioned issue.
Note: Status Flow in Appraisal Template is correctly defined.
Rgds
AJ -
Hi All,
I could not find action logs for online backup and archive log backup in DB12.
And no action log for checkdb also in db13, but job finished successfully.
Job log has
" External program terminated with exit code 1
BRCONNECT returned error status E".
When I checked in DB24 for db operations it shows all actions green and detail logs also available here.
But nothing available from DB12.
I checked and found that actions are not written to SDBAH table.
Kindly suggest what can be done to resolve this.
Thanks in advance.Hi,
permissions are as below.
drwxr-xr-x 2 orasid dba 17408 May 4 12:33 oraarch
drwxr-xr-x 3 orasid dba 96 Jul 15 2008 origlogA
drwxr-xr-x 3 orasid dba 96 Jul 15 2008 origlogB
drwxr-xr-x 2 orasid dba 296960 May 4 12:34 saparch
drwxr-xr-x 2 orasid dba 13312 May 1 21:50 sapbackup
drwxr-xr-x 2 orasid dba 14336 May 4 07:02 sapcheck
drwxr-xr-x 12 orasid dba 8192 Oct 20 2008 sapdata1
drwxr-xr-x 2 orasid dba 96 Sep 30 2008 sapreorg
drwxr-xr-x 4 orasid dba 96 Jul 14 2008 saptrace
And log files are written to sapbakcup/saparch/sapcheck directories but action logs are not displayed via db13/db12.
no entries in SDBAH table, please help me out here. -
Unable to view the appraisal document in PMS
Hi,
We have upgraded our system from 7.01 to 7.4 and ECC from EHP4 to EHP7.
After upgrade we are not able to open the appraisal document from
Appraisal Inbox (Performance management) page/Employee & Reviewer Inbox
page but getting blank screen.
We had refer the note 1600380, according to the note we had checked the objects in all pages mentioned.
But then also unable to view the appraisal document.
Refer the attachment.
Kindly guide us to resolve the issue.
Regards-
PoonamHi ,
Before upgrade it was working fine, There is no change in the authorisation in the backend.
Kindly specify what kind of authorisation are required, so that we can check at our level.
No error messages and logs are generated related to this.
Regards-
Poonam -
Problem in Appraisal Document, in ESS
hi all,
we are getting problem in Appraisal document in career and job service in Employee self service.
when we give the Administration Role to Ess user at portal level i am able to see the appraisal document but when we trying to see the document window is opening with page not found.
if we delete the administrator role at portal side for the Ess user i am not able to see any appraisal document that i am getting the Error
Appraisal Documents (WD UI)
Portal runtime error.
An exception occurred while processing your request. Send the exception ID to your portal administrator.
Exception ID: 11:51_08/01/11_0395_9581350
Refer to the log file for details about this exception.
i added Everyone default Group also.
Wiating for your Reply.
Still getting the problem.
Thankyou
swapnahi
Check 1. Permission of roles 2. Security zone permissions
administrator user will not work as it will be SSO, create proper test user in Portal and R/3 both, and then check whether it is working or not, still if any issue please reply.
-Yogesh -
I hit the wrong entry for find my ipad, I hit the iphone, how do I get it to correct
I hit the wrong entry for "find my ipad, how do i get it to correct
You can log out of the currently logged in account by tapping on it in Settings > Store, and you should then be able to log in with the account that you want.
-
Error on Flexible Performance Management Appraisal Document
Hello Experts,
We are in the process of building Performance Management using Enhancement Package 4 in ECC 6.0. I am having issues with getting the Appraisal Document to work for MSS. Just to clarify too, I have no experience with Performance Management and the fact that we are using Enhancement package 4, our Functional consultants are not sure what to expect either. One more thing, the SICF service is activated.
*) When trying to preview the Appraisal Document (com.sap.pct.erp.mss.hap_document), I am receiving a Portal Run Time error.
*) When I go into SE80, I am using Package u2018PAOC_HAP_DOCUMENT_WD_UIu2019 to run a test on Web Dynpro Application HAP_MAIN_DOCUMENT, I am receiving u2018Access via 'NULL' object reference not possible.u2019
*) When I go into SE80, I am using Package u2018PAOC_HAP_DOCUMENT_WD_UIu2019 to run a test on Web Dynpro Configuration HAP_AC_MAIN_DOC, I am receiving u201Cu2018Error in Calling Up Applicationu2019 The Web Dynpro application was called up with the wrong URL parametersu201D.
QUESTIONS:
1) Do I have to implement Generic Performance Management (com.sap.pct.erp.mss.14.generic_performance_management) to call the appraisal document?
2) Is there any special configuration that needs to be done to make the HAP_MAIN_DOC work (portal or R/3)?
3) Do I need to manually create an SICF service for this?
4) Is there any documentation on how to implement the Flexible?
Any direction would be appreciated.
Thank you,
MikeHello H2R,
I copied the Iview Generic Performance Management (com.sap.pct.erp.mss.14.generic_performance_management) with Application Name 'HAP_START_PAGE_POWL_UI_MSS' and the Application Configuration Name 'HAP_START_PG_POW_MSS_AC'.
Activated the SICF services of 'hap_main_document', 'HAP_START_PG_POW_MSS_AC', 'HAP_START_PAGE_POWL_UI_MSS. Also, I would activate the services that begin with 'HAP' that l thought that I would need.
In SE80, there are 2 locations to find these Applications: 1) Web Dynpro Comp./Intf. = FPM_OIF_COMPONENT and 2) Package = PAOC_HAP_DOCUMENT_WD_UI.
As for the notes, we are on SAPK-60420INEAHRGXX, these are the notes that we applied:
1468466 - PM Launchpad Config
1463821 - PM Portal Config
1416756 - OBN Config in PM
1408243 - Config for OBN
Hope this helps,
Mike -
Change mode for 'further participant;' in appraisal document
hi!
My goal is to change HAP_DOCUMENT BSP to allow Further Participants(FP) to change goal setting and appraisal documents.
for this i am changing the page document.where.participated.htm to enable the FP to change document(employee columns ONLY (objectives, checkboxes, employee assessment))for this i redirected the next page to 'change documnet'. Now i am able to change the appraisal document when i login as a further participant and if i am both the appraiser and apparisee. For the appraiser documents for which i am not the appraiser and appraisee, i am not able to change the fields in the document. I did some reasearch on this and came to know that some badis need to be used for this functionality.
Please advice If anyone came across such scenario.
Any help would be greatly appriciated.
Thank you
manasa
Message was edited by: manasa>hi jothi,
>i tested the page from the BSP application and it is >working fine. i did give this page as the start page for >the link in the portals but if i log into portal and
>test the page somehwere the processing mode is set back >to blank and so it is nt working. but if i test it from >bsp the processing mode is 'X'(which i set in the BSP).
>Please suggest me.
It's Strange. Where you have impleneted the Col Access Code..in the BADI / in ur BSP Page itself?
The objective Settings also can be controlled by COL_ACCESS BADI.Find out the name of the columns in HRHRAP* Tables & change the visibility.
Rgds,
Jothi.
Maybe you are looking for
-
Problem Launching Java Applet with Plug-in: Version 1.4.2_01
Hello out there: I recently installed j2re-1.4.2_01 on my home computer but have been unable to access Web sites emmploying JAva applets. The following is an email exchange with Jeff Hall of Lowell Observatory, manager of an educational site hosted b
-
Creation of subcontracting challan
Hi all, I have done all the required customization settings,,, procedure i followed is: 1. created two raw materials with material type ROH, - materials R1, R2 cretated a semifinished material with material type HALB- material S1 2.created a BOM
-
Just purchased a new ipad 2 and when I go into settings I don't have an icloud icon anywhere. Where is it? Please help me !!!
-
trying to download a rental movie i get the followinf error: There was an error with itunes request error 5103 how do i resolve
-
Hook up Linksys Router to ValetPlus?
I just purchased a TV with internet capabilities so I'd like to hook it up to my home network but it's way too far away for the direct connection they would like (no wireless adapter). My home network is current up and running using the Valet Plus M