AS + AR Missing on Solaris 8

Hello,
I installed Solaris Developer version and I'm trying to install Oracle8i and it gives me compilation error. While trying to run make manually I get the following errors:
-------------------------- START --$ /usr/ccs/bin/make -f ins_rdbms.mk install
chmod 755 /opt/oracle/product/816/bin
rm -f oracle mig dbv tstshm maxmem orapwd dbfsize cursize svrmgrl extproc hsalloci hsots hsdepxa osh sbttest imp exp sqlldr rman kgmgr loadpsp /opt/oracle/product/816/rdbms/lib/ksms.s /opt/oracle/product/816/rdbms/lib/ksms.o
Using deferred protocol..
rm -f /opt/oracle/product/816/rdbms/lib/nmliblist
/bin/sh: /usr/ccs/bin/as: cannot execute
ar: cannot open config.o
No such file or directory
ar: config.o not found
make: *** [opt/oracle/product/816/rdbms/lib/config.o] Error ------------------- STOP ------------------
Any help on this issue is appriciated.
Thank you.
Dirk.

Hi Dirk,
The ar utility comes as part of package SUNWbtool, from what I can
gather. Please check to see that this package is installed:
pkginfo -l SUNWbtool
The package can be located on main SOlaris CD or Solaris Software CD 2 of 2 and added in the normal way with pkgadd.
I also would have expected, like yourself, that this package should
be installed as part of the Developer Cluster. I will have a look into
this to confirm/verify this.
I hope that this helps,
Regards
Derek SUN-DTS

Similar Messages

SUNWdc CNS data collector package missing in Solaris U7 05/09

Hi All,
I found that SUNWdc package is missing in Solaris U7 05/09 package list. It is present in Solaris 11/06 release. Can you please let me know why this package is not part of Solaris U7 05/09 list. What is the purpose of this package.
Thanks,
Ram.

Hi All,
I found that SUNWdc package is missing in Solaris U7 05/09 package list. It is present in Solaris 11/06 release. Can you please let me know why this package is not part of Solaris U7 05/09 list. What is the purpose of this package.
Thanks,
Ram.

Dlpi_enabnotify missing from Solaris 10u8?

Hi,
Trying to compile Python 2.6 on Solaris 10u8 x86 encounters compiler errors which seem
to indicate that dlpi_enabnotify is missing, however man dlpi_enabnotify says it should be there?
I was wondering how I can obtain dlpi_enabnotify for Solaris 10u8?
pkgbuild: building 'dlpi' extension
pkgbuild: /opt/sunstudio12.1/bin/cc -xregs=no%frameptr -KPIC -DNDEBUG -O -I. -I/h/goanna/2/os_5.10/kt/BUILD/SUNWPython26-2.6.4/Python-2.6.4/./Include -I. -IInclude -I./Include -I/usr/lib/libffi-3.0.8/include -I/h/goanna/2/os_5.10/kt/BUILD/SUNWPython26-2.6.4/Python-2.6.4/Include -I/h/goanna/2/os_5.10/kt/BUILD/SUNWPython26-2.6.4/Python-2.6.4 -c /h/goanna/2/os_5.10/kt/BUILD/SUNWPython26-2.6.4/Python-2.6.4/Modules/dlpimodule.c -o build/temp.solaris-2.10-i86pc-2.6/h/goanna/2/os_5.10/kt/BUILD/SUNWPython26-2.6.4/Python-2.6.4/Modules/dlpimodule.o
pkgbuild: "/h/goanna/2/os_5.10/kt/BUILD/SUNWPython26-2.6.4/Python-2.6.4/Modules/dlpimodule.c", line 356: syntax error before or at: dlpi_notifyinfo_t
pkgbuild: "/h/goanna/2/os_5.10/kt/BUILD/SUNWPython26-2.6.4/Python-2.6.4/Modules/dlpimodule.c", line 356: warning: undefined or missing type for: dlpi_notifyinfo_t
pkgbuild: "/h/goanna/2/os_5.10/kt/BUILD/SUNWPython26-2.6.4/Python-2.6.4/Modules/dlpimodule.c", line 442: warning: implicit function declaration: dlpi_enabnotify
% man dlpi_enabnotify
Reformatting page. Please Wait... done
Data Link Provider Interface Library Functions
dlpi_enabnotify(3DLPI)
NAME
dlpi_enabnotify - enable DLPI notification
SYNOPSIS
cc [ flag... ] file... -ldlpi [ library... ]
#include <libdlpi.h>
int dlpi_enabnotify(dlpi_handle_t dh, uint_t notes,
dlpi_notifyfunc_t funcp, void arg, dlpi_notifyid_t *id);
typedef void dlpi_notifyfunc_t(dlpi_handle_t,
dlpi_notifyinfo_t *, void *);
% elfdump /lib/libdlpi.so.1| grep dlpi_enabnotify
Thanks, Mark

Did a rebuild with current patches, did not run JASS or an in-house hardening script on the nodes and I get the same result.
I think I might have a bug issue with the bge driver or something.
On the first node before running scinstall all nic lights are lit.
After that first node reboots from scinstall the nic lights stay lit until right before the CMM messages begin appearing on the console. At that point the interconnect lights go out and stay out physically.
No errors were detected with sccheck or in the install logs for the cluster.
I tried a rebuild of the cluster nodes using a switch (ProCurve 2626) for the interconnects rather than an ethernet cable or cross-over cable.
I have a hme interface in my V210 and V240 and I am going to use that for one of the interconnects to see if it matters.
Basically at this point it is definitely not something physical (bad cable, bad switch port, etc) but something in the cluster configuration from scinstall that is not digging the interconnects and keeping the cluster nodes from conversing.
Since the cluster isn't working anyway I can do a clintr enable node:port,switch@port and see that the ports and switch ports show as enabled by clintr status does not show an interconnect active and the physical ports are not lit.
I do see references to bgeX/0 unregistered in /var/adm/messages but I haven't found information as to what this means or what to do about it exactly yet.
Closest thing so far is this:
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6453203

Sun Fire V490-Internal FC Drives missing in Solaris 10 installation program

Hi,
We have a V490 server that we are attempting to configure, but the internal FC drives are not available to the Solaris 10 installation program.
The OpenBoot SCSI test fails:
{3} ok test-scsi
Testing /pci@9,600000/SUNW,qlc@2
ERROR : ISP2200 RISC engine did not generate expected interrupt.
DEVICE : /pci@9,600000/SUNW,qlc@2
SUBTEST : selftest:loop-tests:inquiry-test:disk-test
CALLERS : (f010f69c)
MACHINE : Sun Fire V490
SERIAL# : 66233440
DATE : 03/27/2012 14:27:32 GMT
CONTR0LS: diag-level=max test-args=
/pci@9,600000/SUNW,qlc@2 selftest failed, return code = 1
but the probe of the SCSI bus does not and displays the drives:
{3} ok probe-scsi
This command may hang the system if a Stop-A or halt command
has been executed. Please type reset-all to reset the system
before executing this command.
Do you wish to continue? (y/n) y
LiD HA LUN --- Port WWN --- ----- Disk description -----
0 0 0 500000e010192d11 FUJITSU MAP3147FC 0110
1 1 0 21000014c320ff73 SEAGATE ST314670FSUN146G055A
How can we fix this problem?
Thanks.
S Kayal
Edited by: 923748 on Mar 27, 2012 10:59 AM
Edited by: 923748 on Mar 27, 2012 11:00 AM

I don't think the test-scsi command is viable for that platform.
The FC disks are "viewed" by the system as external to the SCSI controller, almost as if they were in a multi-pack.
They are FC drives addressed by the chipset as SCSI disks.
Try:
<pre>probe-scsi-all</pre>
Edit:
Which release of Solaris 10 are you trying to install?
Older releases that might be fine for V480's won't work on V490's.
Edited by: rukbat on Mar 27, 2012 2:35 PM

Cannot create solaris 10 zone with flar archive

Hello,
i'm trying to configure a solaris zones with a flar archive of a solaris 10 system.
i've followed the procedure described here : http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/content/submitted/branded_zones_flash.jsp
whenever i try to create a zone and use: set brand=solaris10 the commit will fail with Unknown brand Missing document.
solaris version is Solaris 10 5/08 s10s_u5wos_10 SPARC and i have both the Solaris 8 and Solaris 9 container software installed.
is there another way to install a zone with the native brand or solaris 10 using an archive of some sort?
kind regards,

Thanks,
I've figured as much as using a whole root zone but i still struggle with the configuration of a solaris10 brand and the creation of a zone config with that brand.
I might be bettor of installing the zone without the flar image and try to copy the needed files and applications to the zone.
I only need the solaris10 brand zone to test the flar image so i can use it to restore the system with flar and jumpstart.

Root RAID-1 support totally broken in Solaris 10

Has anyone else noticed yet that support for recovery of a RAID-1 on the root partition is totally broken under Solaris 10? While one can set up a set of RAID-1 partitions for /, swap and /export/home under Solaris 10 in the same manner as Solaris 9 and the resulting RAID-1 is functional, its recovery process is not! If you power down the machine and remove one of the IDE drives making up the RAID-1 (each on their own IDE bus of course), the machine will kernel panic as expected on bootup. However unlike Solaris 9 which allows you to still login to delete the metastat database from the missing drive, Solaris 10 immediately reboots the machine upon the kernel panic. This makes the use of RAID-1 not only non-functional but actually dangerous since it doubles the chance that you will have a drive failure which will make the machine unbootable. Back to Solaris 9 for me.
Jack

I think you've been unfortunately hit by:
6215065 Booting off single disk from mirrored root pair causes panic reset
I'm currently in progress of putting a fix into the current development
release and backporting it to s10 asap which will be available via
a ufs patch eventually
frankB

Authpriv facility in solaris

The authpriv facility is missing in solaris.
how do i get a unix based syslog server receive authpriv syslog messages from a linux one?
The authpriv logs are being ignored by the unix box but i can see other facility logs on the unix box.
Thanks

Dude wrote:
Bash looks for ~/.bash_profile, ~/.bash_login, and ~/.profile, in that order, and reads and executes commands from the first one that exists and is readable. (man page) In other words, it's not reading .profile if ./bash_profile or .bash_login exists. However, the OP might not be using bash.OK, I was wrong again, again, again today.
I am going to quit while I am behind so as to not make it any worse.

Equivalent of sys/ptrace.h on Solaris 10

HI,
We are using the <sys/ptrace.h> as par to our shell scripts. This file, <sys/ptrace.h> is supported both on Linux and Solaris 8.
But somehow it's missing in Solaris 10 and I heard it's supported. Is it true??
Please could somebody who has worked on this provide what could be the alternative to this.
Thanks for you time.
Chakra

#prstat -a will show you the top processes, while use /usr/ucb/ps -auxww to list all the running processes.
you will be able to see what is causing 100% CPU Usage.
you can also check with #iostat -xcn 2 to view disk performance statistics
In recent days I got the similar issue with Solaris 10 on SPARC Platform. where the top process were regarding our transaction switching middleware application when we align our application team they found multiple network connections were coming. Multiple unwanted connections were causing 100% CPU sys utilization.
to view connections we used snoop.
Hope this help.
Regards,
Owais Hyder

Patch Solaris 8 systems

Hi
Is there anyone that has successfully been able to patch Solaris 8 systems using this tool? If you have a guide I would be happy. I have tried a couple of times but failed even though I have installed required patches.
Regards Jerry

Does anything show up in the agent logs directory? You may have missing packages, such as SUNWbash, SUNWswmt, and SUNWgzip which are often missing on Solaris 8 systems.
If you are unable to find anything in the logs then I would advise opening a support case. Note that it is likely that we will ask you to collect information from the system using the [GDD script|http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/scripts/sunScripts/SUN-GDD_sun-connection-collect_noarch.tar.gz] . It would be worthwhile if you could collect the information whilst attempting to run a job against the system.
Run the script on the agent:
# ./SUN-GDD_SunConnection.sh -debugAgent -auto 1800 -o /var/tmpThis will enable debug-level logging on the agent and automatically collect the logs after 30 minutes - you may wish to adjust the time to suit.

Sys-suspend fails on Solaris 9 with tape drive present

I ran across a post by T. Kloeber (http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?threadID=5109999&messageID=9374786) on the Sun developer forum on this.
I replaced my Solaris 7 SS5 with an Ultra 2 and installed Solaris 9 fresh. The external disks and tape drive are unchanged. The SS5 used to suspend properly about 95% of the time, but now the machine refuses to suspend with the tape drive connected. Log messages are:
Mar 21 16:20:13 madera cpr: [ID 535284 kern.notice] System is being suspended
Mar 21 16:20:24 madera cpr: [ID 122848 kern.warning] WARNING: Unable to suspend device st@4,0.
Mar 21 16:20:24 madera cpr: [ID 537702 kern.warning] WARNING: Device is busy or does not support suspend/resume.
Mar 21 16:20:30 madera cpr: [ID 457896 kern.notice] NOTICE: Suspend operation failed.
Mar 21 16:20:30 madera cpr: [ID 583038 kern.notice] System has been resumed.
and the system is not suspended. Is there anything i am missing on Solaris 9?
I am able to modunload the st driver, then when I attempt to suspend, the driver gets reloaded, and I get the failure above.
I ran across an E10000 service manual from 2.6 days that said that tape devices were not suspendable. They must have rethought that by Solaris 7. No idea why 9 should refuse this. I have the latest recommended patches.
TIA for any information!
TW

I ran across a post by T. Kloeber (http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?threadID=5109999&messageID=9374786) on the Sun developer forum on this.
I replaced my Solaris 7 SS5 with an Ultra 2 and installed Solaris 9 fresh. The external disks and tape drive are unchanged. The SS5 used to suspend properly about 95% of the time, but now the machine refuses to suspend with the tape drive connected. Log messages are:
Mar 21 16:20:13 madera cpr: [ID 535284 kern.notice] System is being suspended
Mar 21 16:20:24 madera cpr: [ID 122848 kern.warning] WARNING: Unable to suspend device st@4,0.
Mar 21 16:20:24 madera cpr: [ID 537702 kern.warning] WARNING: Device is busy or does not support suspend/resume.
Mar 21 16:20:30 madera cpr: [ID 457896 kern.notice] NOTICE: Suspend operation failed.
Mar 21 16:20:30 madera cpr: [ID 583038 kern.notice] System has been resumed.
and the system is not suspended. Is there anything i am missing on Solaris 9?
I am able to modunload the st driver, then when I attempt to suspend, the driver gets reloaded, and I get the failure above.
I ran across an E10000 service manual from 2.6 days that said that tape devices were not suspendable. They must have rethought that by Solaris 7. No idea why 9 should refuse this. I have the latest recommended patches.
TIA for any information!
TW

Error: Couldn't open solaris/machines/conf003.rc

Hi:
Installing Solaris 8 Intel is a total nighmare. What a great difference with Red Hat 6.1 (which is practically plug&play)
After following all the installation steps over a complatible hardware intel platform (AMD k6, Samsung Ultra Ata 10gb, no network card), the configuration assistant stops in the first boot showing the following:
Running Configuration Assistant
error: Couldn't open solaris/machines/conf003.rc
The root filesystem is not mounted and the configuration assistant has exited prematurely. Booting is unlikely to succeed. CTL-ALT-DEL may be used to reset the machine.
Well, can anyone tell me what is going on? I can see the blue screen at the begining and i have 2 partitions (boot and solaris). I boot from the boot partition of course. AARRRGHHHHHH�� I NEED SOME HELP GUYS, i know i am a newby :-)

The missing file solaris/machines/conf003.rc seems to hint at a
corrupted saved configuration on the diskette. (You should find
three files conf003.{nam,rc,rf} in the solaris/machines subdirectory
on the DCA diskette). Using a fresh DCA
diskette might indeed help.
Another option is to try to install directly from cdrom - ignoring the
DCA floppy. If your
system can boot from the cdrom drive, try to boot using the
"Software 1 of 2" CD (or the "Installation" CD).

SAP Permormance on Sun T2000 multi core servers.

Hi guys,
On some of the newer sun servers, the performance isn't quite as good as what you would expect.
When you are running a specific job, let say patching using saint for instance the process works as expected, but the disp+work process seems to be just allocated to 'one' of the servers CPU's, rather than the process being distributed across the servers multi-cores, and doesn't seem to be much if any quicker.
I'm sure some of our ZONE settings in S10 must be wrong etc, but have followed the documentation precisely from SAP.
Am i missing some Solaris functionality or do we have to tell SAP to use multi-cores ?
Just intrested in other peoples experiences on the newer Sun servers
Regards
James

An ABAP workprocess is single threaded. Basically that means that the speed of any ABAP program is running is CPU-wise only dependent on the speed of the CPU.
An ABAP system can't leverage the multi-core multi-thread architecture of the new processors seen on the single process. You will see e. g. a significant performance increase if you install a Java engine since those engines have multiple concurrent threads running and can so be processed in parallel as opposed to the ABAP part.
What you can do to speed up an import is setting the parameter
PARALLEL
in the STMS configuration. Set the number to the available number of cores you have. This will increase the import speed since multiple R3trans processes are forked. However, during the XPRA still only one workprocess will be used.
Markus

Remote ssh

I'm trying to run commands remotely from one Solaris box to another via root. We're using ssh on both of the boxes. I set up the /.rhosts and the hosts.equiv on the remote box. I also created /etc/ssh/ssh_known_hosts on the remote box and added the FQDN. I'm used to tru64 and linux, so I'm not sure what I'm missing for Solaris. :)
TIA!

answered my own question:
in order to get it to work, i had to run ssh-keygen -t rsa -f /.ssh/identity, then copy the resulting identity.pub file to the remote server's /.ssh directory, then cat identity.pub >> authorized_keys.

Migrating Solaris 8 Server to Solaris 10 zone - missing files

Hi All,
Wonder if anyone can help, I am trying to migrate a physical solaris 8 server into a Solaris 10 branded Sol 8 zone.
I am trying to create a flar archive file of the Solaris 8 02/02 server using flar create -S -n <name> /<path directory/<name.flar>
On this box has Oracle 9 database. When the archive file has finished and i look at the file contents flar info -l <name.flar> Some of the oracle datafiles have not been archived.
Has anyone come across this problem as im not sure if further files have been missed?
Thanks
D

I'm a little confused about the statement about the zone. Because it is solaris 8, is the entire OS considered a 1 global zone?Solaris 8 has never had zone support nor will it ever have zone support. So from that perspective I guess you could call it a global zone if you wish but at the time Solaris 8 was active the concept of a global zone did not exist. For the purposes of your question, yes, it's only a global zone with no non global zones.
You're reading way to much into this.
alan

Solaris 8 07/01 installation : Fast Data Access MMU Miss

hello,
Because of a hardware crash of my 9.1Gb hard drive, I plugged a brand new 40Gb drive in my Ultra 10 workstation.
I tried to re-install my release of Solaris 8 (06/00), but this release detect only a 5Gb hard drive (but the installation work).
I downloaded and burned Solaris 8, release 07/01 to break the 32Gb/drive limit, but when I type 'boot cdrom' or 'boot cdrom install' at the bios prompt, I get :
Fast Data Access MMU Miss.
I upgraded the PROM to the lastest version, and tried to reburn the CD.
Does someone has any idea to help me ?
Greg.

974009 wrote:
Hello all,
I have been working on a Sun Netra T1 105 for the past two weeks That system is too old for Solaris 11 and Solaris 10. That generation UltraSPARC module isn't going to be recognized by those newer OS's.
I suggest you go to your preferred online auction web site (for example, eBay) and get any Solaris 8(SPARC) or Solaris 9(SPARC) for that little 1U box.
I have disabled auto boot so when it starts it is going to the ok prompt.Smart. Good move for troubleshooting.
The CD of Solaris 11 is a new one that I burned just two weeks ago and I burned it on 24x speed.
And it is the Sparc version that I downloaded.
I also tried installing a DVD-ROM with the Solaris 10 DVD but it gave the same error.I hope that means you replaced the original CD reader with a DVD-capable drive.
When I type probe-ide it shows that the seconday Master is a Removable ATAPI Model: TOSHIBA CDROM XM-7002BcYes. Since that model computer was discontinued in 2002, there was only a CD-capable drive ever qualified to be used in it.
When I type probe-scsi it shows:
Target 0
Unit 0 Disk Seagate ST39103LCSUN9.0G034AA 9GB disk isn't going to be large enough for much more than just a core install of Solaris. You may again need to get larger drive(s) at that same online auction web site. The chassis can hold two internal disks.
Thank you very much.
Hendrik
Edited by: 974009 on 29-Nov-2012 07:34When you get the chance, glance at this link to a copy of the Netra T105's resource page as it appeared in the old Sun System Handbook (SSH). The link is to a non-Oracle site that mirrors the old now-discontinued free version of that SSH.
Next, while there's not much system documentation for that box offered by Oracle, you can glance through what there happens to be here:
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19628-01/index.html

AS + AR Missing on Solaris 8

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for