ASKB issue

Hi Gurus,
problem with fixed asset & depreciation accounts .actually upto september of 2009 the depreciation and ASKB have been done,
we could not use some of our transactions related with fixed assets & depreciations for the last two months since our authorizations blocked.
Now, we got back our authorizations but have problems as explained below.
- ASKB is a regular t-code used before the fresh start for local GAAP postings but I did not use it for October and November 2009 due to fresh start.
- When I try to use the same t-code ASKB now I got below message ?there are no documents to process since the last run,right now i want to run the depreciation and ASKB,for this what i have to do,solve this issue.
regards
jana

Hi,
It is not a error. Execute in background if you still get the message "there is no documents ..." this means ASKB doesn't create any documents, run the depreciation.
Hope it helps.
Ryszard

Similar Messages

  • ASKB - POsting Period not open problem

    Hi All,
    I saw many threads on this problem but not got suiatable solution thats why i am raising this thread again.
    Due to some problem my client not Run ASKB for October period, now when he is trying to run ASKB for November month he is getting error that 'Posting period is not open'.
    Now we cannot open 'Posting period' 'October' because of some organizational issues.
    Kindly suggest me how i run ASKB for 'Current month.
    Regards
    Sandeep

    Hi Sandeep,
    To my regret, is the answer here is definitely NO.                                                                     
    A reconciliation of the system would be not possible (For example, in foreign currency and a parallel currency).
    This source of error was stopped by switching from batch input sessions  to the Direct booking with RAPERB2000. (With batch input sessions  it was possible to manipulate).
    Furthermore, the values in the periodically posting areas have to be posted into the correct period.
    If the reconciliation is not relevant, you can check via testrun which values have to be posted and post them via FB01. In this case you have to manipulate also the table TABAS and T093D.  But take into acount that this is on your own risk and will not be supported by SAP.
    My personal opinion: Open the periods and run the RAPERB2000 regular.
    Regards Bernhard
    Edited by: Bernhard Kirchner on Nov 29, 2010 12:54 AM

  • ASKB posting error, period 7 2010 is closed

    Hi All,
    Fo for the captioned issue , 2010 year is not closed . 
    When we are tring to close the same through AJAB, we are gettiing teh error, transactions not completely periodically posted.
    I got the error '1000xxxx-xxx  Depreciation not posted completely'
    Now I tried to run ASKB .
    I get teh error `period 7 2010 is not open`. Please let me know, how to handle this scenario.As we can no more open 2010 period.
    How to ensure 2010 asset year close will be done.
    Regards
    Rudra

    Hello,
    Please check the set-up of transaction OADB.
    If you have areas assigned to GL indicator 2, 4, 5 and 6 this causes the error.
    You need to temporarily set GL indicator for those Areas to 0. Then run AJAB. You will not encounter any more error regarding "not periodically posted". After you run AJAB, you may set the indicator back.
    Thanks!
    Jhero

  • ASKB error - Posting period 012 2009 is not open

    Hi All,
    We are using ECC 6.0 version.
    We have posted an asset acquisition on 31st Dec 2008 in a Local Dep area with posting date 31st Dec 2009. Posting was made only in Local ledger and not in leading ledger.
    It was a mistake from our side and rectified immediately on the same day by reversing the entry and reposted with posting date 31st Dec 2008
    This issue is erroneous as posting period 12 2009 was open at the time of posting and later realized and has been closed.
    Now, We are trying to run ASKB for all the assets in that Co.Code. But, System is blocking the entire log for processing. The Error being u201Cposting period 012 2009 is not openu201D
    We cannot exclude this particular asset for this run and we cannot even open period 012 2009 for security reasons
    Pls advise.
    Thanks,
    Pavan.

    Hi Pawan,
    May be you can try posting with period 12/2009 opened. For security reasons, you can block the period for others and keep it opened only for a particular authorisation group and have the auth. group assigned to only one person who runs the transaction.
    Regards,
    Mike

  • Error AA 738 while periodic asset posting - ASKB

    Hello,
    could you please advise if anybody have encounterd following error when executing transaction: ASKB (test run) as background processing:
    Number range 01 has not been created for document type AA.
    Message no. AA738
    Diagnosis
    No valid number range interval has been created for document type AA.
    Procedure
    Specify an interval for number range 01 in the year 999 for company code XXXX.
    I checked that for the mentioned company code number range 01 is created for the current year.
    Additionally users executed production run of ASKB (without a test run) and then got an error: Account determination - Loss made on  asset retirement w/o reven. not found for area 20 for account group 1411000 - this was fixed but then additional error AA738 came up.
    If you can advise how to get rid of error AA738, I would be more than grateful.
    Thank you in advance,
    Monika

    Hi
    Though the error says 999, usually its maintained for 9999 (assuming there is no issue wiht your FYsettings)
    In addition to that,
    The report evaluates all asset transactions since the last run. Unlike the periodic depreciation posting program, the APC posting run is not tied to a certain accounting period. It generates one document per posting period and depreciation area. That means that asset values are summarized for various account groups in one document. Document number assignment is external. You have to enter the document type in Customizing for Asset Accounting.
    What I suggest, pls go thru the blue colour 'i' icon in that T code input screen.
    regards
    S

  • Year ending closing ASKB

    Hi,
    Please suggest to me for below given issue.
    As per business requirement, we need open new FY2012 and close the old FY2010 and we trying to close the FY2010 in AJAB but system through the error message as u201CTransactions not complete ly periodically posted u201C( message no : AU075),
    As per this error message system show the procedure as
    1.Check which depreciation areas are supposed to post APC values periodically to Financial Accounting according to their Customizing definitions (indicator: "Post assets periodically in General Ledger")
    See the Define How Depreciation Areas Post to General Ledger IMG activity.
    2.Start the program for posting APC values. In the Asset Accounting main menu, choose Periodic processing. Start this program in update mode, regardless of whether or not documents are displayed in test mode, or if a message appears stating that there are no documents to be posted.
    Start APC Posting Program
    As per second step we run the periodic asset postings in AKSB, while running this postings system through the error message as u201CPosting periods 2010 not openu201D and we suggest to business need to open 2010 periods, they are asking once we reopen that period  FY 2010 what about FY 2010 result values.
    So please suggest to me on urgent basis.
    Many thanks in advance for your valuable suggestions

    It seems that if you reopen FY10 and run ASKB in live mode you will get postings - and hopefully the postings will net to zero but probably not.  Running the test mode should tell you what the outcome would be, accounting wise.
    If you do this, chances are that you would also need to rerun AFAR and AFAB depending on whatever comes through ASKB to completed asset records.  Again, analyzing ASKB test mode data will tell you whether a depreciation REPEAT would be needed.
    If your FY10 g/l has already been audited, or FY11 has already been audited, then you might consider booking journal entry in FY11 (that will reverse in FY12) moving the accounting impact to a year that has not been audited yet.  This type of entry is usually referred to as an adjusting entry that defers accounting recognition.  I just call it a deferral which is the opposite of an accrual.  Hopefully the magnitude of the accounting is not material in the eyes of your auditor.
    1) add ASKB to your end of year routines
    2) you forgot to close FY10 until you were reminded when you tried to open FY12, as only two fiscal years can be open at same time
    Regards

  • Account 'Contra account: Acquisition value' could not be found in ASKB

    Hi SAP experts
    1. First we have created new asset with reference old assets in As01
    2. After that we have transfer all asset from old to new asset with in the company code in the ABUMN  T.code in the month on 01.04.2010
    3. After that we have run the deprecation for April, May and Jun. Up to this, there were no problem those periods 
    (now here we are following first we are running the ASKB and after that we are running AFAB)
    4. now we are facing the new issue for July month while running ASKB Like Below
    Account 'Contra account: Acquisition value' could not be found  for Deprecation area  52
         Message no. AU133
    Diagnosis: When creating the accounting document, the system could not find account
         'Contra account: Acquisition value' for company code 0216.
    System Response
    Procedure:  Enter this account in the account determination for Asset Accounting.
    Here in Error log it showing three account determinations 100002,100010 and 100040
    5.As per my knowledge we can maintain the G/L account for account determination in the T.code AO90 for deprecation area wise but why the new error massage has come into picture.
    Please let me know if you require more information about the issue
    Can you any body  please give me suggestion based on the issue and
    Thanks and Regards
    sudharshana vamsi

    Hi Sridevi
    Thanks for your suggestions
    if i will maintain G/L account for account determination in the T.code AO90 for deprecation area wise, is there any effects for another company codes and balance sheet  wise
    And also we are running depreciation since 2003, now suddenly it is coming into picture in the month of July. and may i know the reason. Are there any new patches are added in sap
    And also if you donu2019t mind can you tell me what are purpose to maintain the Contra G/L account in the AO90.
    Thanks and Regards
    sudharshana vamsi

  • Asset period end closing issue

    Hello Experts,
    I am facing an issue in year closing for 2009. The error says that  Asset balance sheet values not completely posted. This is in Area 11 where APC values are not completely posted. This depreciation area is set up in 2009 only with post to general ledger indicator 2 (Area Posts APC and Depreciation on Periodic Basis) in OADX.
    The error message takes me to start APC posting program(ASKB). When I execute this I get an error that "Account 'Acquisition:Acquis. and production costs' could not be found for area 11"
    My question is if I give an account for this for area 11, what will be the accounting entry. What will be the offsetting account?
    What other alternatives I have?
    Many thanks in advance.
    Sangram

    Hi
    You need to maintain the APC Account for Dep Area 11 inorder for ASKB to go through....
    You can use the same account maintained in Dep Area 01....
    The posting generated in ASKB is as explained above... i..e One leg of the entry goes to Contra Account and another goes to APC account or Profit/Loss on sale of asset, as the case may be
    br, Ajay M

  • Reverse ASKB postings

    Dear all,
    During the upgrade from 4.7 to 6.0 I go an error while Running ASKB restart posting run.
    The error message is:
    Errors occurred during the posting run Message no. APERB003. Company code CZ11, depreciation area 10, fiscal year 2009, account group Z1051 (Serious error occurred during repeat run Message no. APERB008)
    According to SAP note 859617 this error could be due to one of the asset balance sheet accounts involved (APC account, accumulated depreciation account) is controlled as a reconciliation account for fixed assets (account type A in the account master record). I have checked all customizing for the Account determination and none of the accounts is defined as reconciliation account. I have run T-code OAK4 and I have no issues with the account groups of company code CZ11
    Could someone tell me how to have RAPERB2000 run reversed? Or how to resolve this issue.  I have tried to reverse the documents generated by the RAPERB2000 run with T-code FB08 however is not possible.
    Thanks in advance,
    Nuno

    Good Afternoon Nuno,
    Did you got any answer to your question? I've discovered that this problem occured to me after I changed depreciation areas G/L code 4 to 2 after I've executed ASKB first time.
    I need to keep G/L 2 for depreciation areas at the same time execute ASKB.
    Regards.

  • Duplicated Postings - ASKB

    Hello everyone,
    We have created an additional depreciation area which posts APC values and Depreciation periodically (posting rule is set to 4).
    Derived Area is set to zero.
    We posted asset aquisition using transaction code F-90  (T.T. 100) and everything looks great.
    But when we run ASKB, posting is duplicated in the non-leading ledger. 
    Any ideas?
    Thank you,
    Sofia

    Thank you Ajay for your reply.
    The initial configuration of our depreciation areas is set to 1-3-6, as you suggested.
    Now, we are trying to switch our AA approach due to a different requirement.
    Scenario: Local asset aquisition (leading ledger) applies to tangable asset whereas IFRS aquisition applies to intangible asset.
    We used "limited transaction type" functionality in order to reflect that into our system but in order to be able to post those limited-postings to the non-leading ledger, depreciation area (assigned to non-leading ledger) should be set to 2 or 4. 
    (Further suggestions related to the scenario requested would be appreciated.)
    Here we come again to the duplicated entries.
    I've read snotes related to the issue and I have some questions:
       During the aquisition entry (classic F-90) , table APERB_ITEMS should be updated or not?  (depreciation areas are set to 1-2-0 or 1-2-6)
       Is that  the "V2-posting"  mentioned at snote 1626675 ?
    Thank you,
    Sofia

  • ASKB postings

    Hello All,
    Currently I have depreciation area "31" configured to  4 -Area Posts APC Directly and Depreciation. We have assigned the local ledger to this area. Currently the issue is whenever we have an APC there is double booking to the local ledger. I thought have 31 configred to "4 -Area Posts APC Directly and Depreciation" would solve this issue but the system is asking to run ASKB when I close my asset year.
    Any work around to not to have double booking?
    Regards,
    Prem

    Hello Brigtte,
    I did set the area based on the parallel valuation for depreciation area:
    01 Area 0L Local GAAP -> 1
    31 Area 31 IAS  3 CL (local ledger) : Note this is the area I use to revalue for Inflation.
    73 Derived area 6 CL (local ledger)
    I ran inflation posted the revalued amount; APC is not double booking in my "CL" local ledger anymore.
    However I have an error when I close the asset year; asking me to run ASKB.
    I ran ASKB and I am getting the below error:
    "Error when creating line items using line item schema SAP_200_001...
    Message no. AA548
    Diagnosis
    The system found inconsistencies in the structure of the FI document line items. Line item schema SAP_200_001 does not provide reliable results in relation to posting to the general ledger.
    Procedure
    Check line item schema SAP_200_001 for this posting transaction. There are two possible causes for the error:
    1. A value field was updated on the asset, and this value field is updated to a reconciliation account in FI (for example, an asset balance sheet account, accumulated depreciation or down payments), but there is no line item defined for this value field in the line item schema.
    2. The error message can also be caused by incorrect account allocation. In order to find out if you have incorrect account allocations in the account determination for Asset Accounting, carry out a consistency check of the accounts. The consistency check is part of FI-AA Customizing."
    I ran the consistencies check for GL account config everything seems fine. Any idea about this issue.
    Regards,
    Prem
    Hi,
    If I understand you correctly, you have set up a ledger scenario.
    You mentioned that in OADB you have indicator '4' set, which I assume is in the derived area.
    However, the derived area should have indicator 5 or 6.
    Ensure that you have the correct ledger scenario in place: refer to the standard ledger scenario logic documentation.
    A basic configuration of depreciation areas and posting indicators in asset transaction OADB should be:
    Posting to G/L Ledger
    Area 01 local GAAP 1 -> 0L
    Area XX IAS 3 -> 1L (your ledger code)
    Area YY (IAS -local GAAP) 6 -> 1L (your ledger code)
    Same needs to be done for other ledgers if you have.
    Be aware also that according to ledger scenario logic acquisition/transfer/retirement postings in area 01 go to ALL ledgers, independently of the setting in OADB (this is not an error). The difference is posted through the derived area.
    I hope this helps.
    Best regards,
    Brigitte

  • ASKB Periodic posting

    Hi can any one help me as today is last day we are going to close the financial books
    "we transfer two asset to other profit centre , out fi consultant told during Feb and march 08 we have to do ASKB
    let me kxplain u clearly
    "total during jan to March 2 assets but two different transaction,we transfer 2 asset to other profit centre
    During Feb and march'08.for that FI consultant told we have to do ASKB transaction,but we don't know for what purpose and what will happend by this transactions
    1)1 Asset No. is 214009000029 Power Press Trs. from IN40507 TO IN 61506
    2)other asset is 214009000197 trs. from In41513 to IN61506
    we have done Abumn i have done,and asset is tranfered to respective profit cengtre
    Kindly check this issue whether we need to do ASKB ?
    if  so?how to do askb
    kindly take this scenario  and help me to complete this issue
    Regards
    Mallikarjuna

    Hi Mallikarjuna,
    You need this transaction only when you have more then one derpreciation area that create psting in FI.
    You can run the program in test mode without problems and you will see on the list if you have to run a life run or not
    Paul

  • T-CODE ASKB - Period

    Hi Gurus,
    In the t-code ASKB, we receive an error message that documents are trying to post to period 8, but this period is closed. Itu2019s possible to post in other period ( 9, this is open)??. In t-code ASKB  is not an option period to post.
    Anyone have this issue?
    Tks,

    Hi,
    the RAPERB (tr. ASKB) looks in table TABAS in wich period was the last periodic posting and which period should be posted next.
    regards Bernhard

  • ASKB Error

    Hi Friends,
    The business try to execute the t. code  ASKB manually to post the year 2010 getting an error message Account 'Acc dep, account for ordinary depreciation' could not be found for area10.
    As we can see in the Asset Explorer for the asset 10010000009 ordinary depreciation was calculated as 7900.57 EUR. and also find that this asset was retired on 10 2010.
    1) I understand that this depreciation came from the legacy transfer. There is no depreciation in any year.
    2) This transaction had run since started globe. I understand that the error became when this asset was retired on February 2010.
    Request you to let us know how to rectify the error, how can we run the ASKB with out any errors.
    Regards
    Sree

    Hi Sree,
    Error AU133, is generally issued from some wrong or missing customizing. The text of the error message indicates in your case that a "dep, account for ordinary depreciation' " and area 10 is concerned.
    1) At first, please double check if in in AO90 (or table T095)  the account is maintained for area 10.
    Further, check in tr. OADB if you have defined "Different Depreciation Area XX". That means area 64 takes the account determination from area xx and perhaps there it is no account defined?
    If this is not the reason:
    2) Execute report RACKONT1 or transaction OAK4. Account determination should be set following the rules explained in SAP note 7595. Even if some account is not directly used, the account determination has to be completed. If output from RACKONT1 is not error free, it indicates that your customizing is wrong. You might correct it with the help of note 7595.
    Furthermore:
    3) You have defined the account in Asset Accounting, however, it is not created in the affected company code. Check whether the account is correct and create it for the company code, if necessary.
    4) Threats
    Error AU133 Account 'Contra account: Acquisition value' could not be found
    AFAB- account determination error
    Error AU133 received while posting asset transfer
    Best regards Bernhard

  • ASKB functionality

    Dear Seniors,
    What is the functionality of ASKB.  How exactly it picks the figures for the line items.
    As per my knowledge,  ASKB posts the difference in Depreciation posting of two different books are posted.  Let's say for example, difference in Depreciation adjustment entries between INGAAP and USGAAP willl be posted to INGAAP books.
    But, in our case, one entry is posted to Clearing Revenue GL also.  How this GLs are picked and what is the reason for picking clearing revenue GL?
    Thanks and Regards
    KVKR

    Hi,
    The basic issue is, when we run ASKB, Clearing revenue GL should not be hit.  But, in one of the cases it is happening like that.  I would like to know the scenarios when the clearing revenue GL is hit, while doing ASKB.
    I would like to give an example, how ASKB works.  (This is a real case from the production system )
    Descriptions of the GLs involved in the transactions are given below -
    573102     -   Loss from disposal - machinery/equipment
    573103     -   Profit from disposal - machinery/equipment
    573104     -   Clearing revenue for assets sales-Mach & Eqpt (Cr)
    21400001     -   Plant and machinery - General
    21400016     -   Vehicles
    21450015     -   Accum Depreciation- Vehicles
    When we sell assets the following documents will get posted in both IN and US GAAP books
    Vehicles
         573102         Dr   667410.27     
         573104         Dr   133332     
         21400016         Cr   1821380
         21450015         Dr   1020637.73     
    573102         Dr 180872     
         573103         Cr  40449
         573104         Dr  283628     
         21400001        Cr    424051
    Entries should have been                              
    in US GAAP          
    GL             Debit         Credit
    573102         667410.27     
    573104         133332     
    21400016                  1821380
    21450015         1020637.73     
    573102         180872     
    573103                  40449
    573104         283628     
    21400001                  424051
    in IN GAAP          
       GL          Debit              Credit
    573102         816313     
    573104         133332     
    21400016                   1863059
    21450015         913414     
    573102           
    573103                     283628
    573104         283628     
    21400001          0
    So, ASKB posts the following entry
    *only in IN GAAP          *
    GL        Debit              Credit
    573102                    275147.12
    573103          
    573104           
    21400016                    41679
    21450015                    107224.88
    21400001         424051     
    Now, the doubt is the above example is a peculiar case, where, even the Gross Block values in IN GAAP and US GAAP books are different.  Even in this case, while doing ASKB, Clearing revenue GL is not coming.
    But, in one of the cases of our organization, when we run ASKB for a particular month, system is showing 7 million figure in Clearing revenue GL.  What could be the reason for this?
    According to my understanding, Clearing revenue GL should not be hit at all.
    Plz advise.
    Regards

Maybe you are looking for