ASN not netting against PO in ASCP plan

Hello!
I am loading Advanced Shipment Notices (ASN) from supplier directly into planning instance using the "Load Transaction Data using Self Service Loads" concurrent program.The ASN is referencing the PO number that it is shipped against. However, when I run the ASCP plan, the ASN is seen as "In Transit" supply on top of the PO quantity. I expected that the plan should not consider ASN as additional supply, but should be netted off against the PO quantity. Appreciate any pointers on how to make this work correctly.
Cheers!

Hi
Based on your comment about the order number, it seems that you're trying to look for sales orders which were scheduled using ATP/ GOP after last ASCP plan run. You may either be using ATP based on collected data or some of these items aren't included in your plan thereby forcing ATP to use ODS/ Collected data to promise/ schedule these sales orders.
When ATP/ GOP promises these sales orders using collected data, you'll see them dynamically inserted in ODS data (msc_sales_orders) and order number will show up as "258945" but after next collections, same sales order record is replaced by collected version with SO# as "258945.USA Sales Order.ORDER ENTRY(6.2)".
Here are possible ways to validate/ resolve this issue:
1. If you use "ATP/CTP based on Planning Data", these SO will be inserted dynamically in ASCP Plan and will be visible in ASCP workbench in Pink/ Magenta color though no pegging will be available until next plan run. You'll find these orders will have a record_source value as '1'
2. If you use "ATP based on Collected Data", these SO will be included in the ASCP plan in next collections/ ASCP Plan run and same must be happening now as long as these items are included in the plan based on your plan options setting. Please note that ASCP Plan is a statis information as of the time of plan run and any SO scheduled after ASCP plan run won't be included until next plan run.
Hope this clarifies the concern and you'll be able to validate the scenario in your case. For any further concerns, please contact me directly and I'll be glad to help you.
Thanks
Navneet Goel
[email protected]

Similar Messages

  • Does ASCP net against approved requisitions

    Hi All,
    I released a few approved Requistions using ASCP Workbench tool. After that I reran my data collection process & launched ASCP plan to review fresh recommendations. However, I still see ASCP asking me to release new requisitions though I have released in my last run. I haven't changed Forecasts nor have I added new sales order demand. Does ASCP net against approved requisitions ?
    Thanks for the help.
    Sandeep

    Hello Sandeep,
    first check if you can see the PO/PR in collected data (collections workbench).
    If you can't see it then it's likely a problem with the planning manager not updating MTL_SUPPLY. Check the MPS% columns in MTL_SUPPLY whether these are populated for the PO/PR in question.
    If they aren't verify that the planning manager is running fine (MRP - setup - planning manager).
    If it's running then and the MPS% columns are null then make a small change to the PO/PR and reapprove. Wait until the planning manager has done at least one cycle. MTL_SUPPLY should be updated then.
    Afterwards recollect PO's/PR's
    hope it helps
    Geert

  • Collected ATO Model & items with sales orders and forcast not in ASCP plan

    PTO/ATO/ATP challenged - need some help understanding this and how it should work or if it can work.
    On 11.5.10.2, a customer wants to see the ATO model and options in the ASCP plan
    when the ATO configuration item is not created in the Sales Order.
    Using the BOMN example below level 2 - ATO item and level 4 - Marketing Code (Forecast at this level)
    ALTIX-4700-PTO-Z level 1 PTO Model
    ALTIX-4700-ATO-Z level 2 ATO model
    --ALTIX4700-SYS-Z        level 3
    LST-IRU-Z level 4 Ordered item
    LST-4700-WC-Z level 4 Ordered item
    LST-IRU-WC-SRACK-Z level 4 Ordered item
    They are not seeing level 4 items in the plan even though they have Sales Order Demand and forecast at this level.
    They see the items in the collection workbench, but they are missing in the ASCP plan.
    Any ideas will be appreciated.
    Thanks.
    Edited by: Bob Marchant on Oct 16, 2008 12:02 PM

    Are you able to book an order on sales order work bench with same configuartion?

  • ASCP Plan Is Not Able To Read Global Forecast For Options Published By Demantra

    ASCP plan is not able to read global forecast for options published by Demantra
    ASCP plan is not able to read global forecast for options published by Demantra. Only Model Forecast is being read into ASCP plan. 
    1) We are publishing global forecast from Demantra at CTO/Zone/Week level and it is getting published properly to ASCP denorm table. 
    2)There is no forecast explosion being done in ascp (plan option explode forecast is not checked) 
    3)The sourcing rule is set at zone level for the model saying source from an organization (org code 11) 
    4) The profile: msc:-Organization containing generic BOM for global forecasting is set to 22 which is a reference org 
    5) Now when we run the plan the model forecast goes to org 11  but the option forecasts do not go properly 
    6) We have just one line created for the option (production forecast) with a wrong quantity
    7) Demantra has forecasts for both Model and options

    Looking at the error message "The Network Adapter could not establish the connection" , It appears hostname and port may be incorrect. Review the targets.xml under E:\oracle\product\10.2.0\db_1\SAP_solman_SDB\emd and
    emoms.properties under E:\oracle\product\10.2.0\db_1\SAP_solman_SDB\config folder to make sure host ( sap_solman) and port (1527) are correct.
    As far as setting the environment variables goes, you can go to control panel -> system -> advanced -> environment variables and set the ORACLE_HOME and ORACLE_SID
    -Ramesh

  • How to Check MRP/MPS ASCP planning manager running or not

    Hi Team,
    How to Check MRP/MPS ASCP planning manager running or not.
    Could you please navigation for the same.
    Regards
    Jagadeesh

    Hi Jagadeesh,
    You can check whether the planning manager is running or not from the following navigation:
    Material Planner (R)  -> Setup -> Planning Manager
    You can get more information on planning manager from the below note:
    11.5 - Planning Manager Related Issues - A Complete Troubleshooting Guide (Doc ID 131051.1)
    Hope that helps!!
    Regards,
    Mohan Balaji
    NOTE: Please mark the post as Helpful or Answered if the update has really helped you. This would also bring the thread to logical conclusion and will be helpful for the viewers.

  • MRP Planned % Safety Stock Not Generating Supply in R12 ASCP

    Playing with MRP Planned Safety Stock in an unconstrained plan. See safety stock in the horizontal plan. See safety stock in the pegging tree. Yet this type of safety stock is not generating any supply recommendations. However with "regular fixed quantity" safety stock the plan is. Thanks in advance.

    Hi
    If I understand your qn correctly., user defined SS is working and MRP planned % is not. Have you setup MRP planned % such that you gave the SS method., bucket days and % for the item attributes?
    Also make sure that you have demand for the item since it looks at your demand in future,adds up demand within the bucket days and applies the % .
    Thnx
    Partha

  • INACTIVE Items in ASCP plan

    Hi,
    We are having a problem with Items with Inactive status code in source instance showing up in ASCP plan.
    Any idea what flags on items that Collection program will check during data pull?
    Thanks
    Sudhakar

    Sudhakar,
    It seems you have defined an inventory status of "Inactive" that maps to certain key attributes in oracle inventory. ASCP data collection does not key off user defined status names, but you can setup the system so that the key ASCP data collection attributes become disabled for 'inactive items'.
    From memory, data collection keys off of at least three planning attributes to determine whether an item should be collected:
    1. MRP Planning method = Any value except 'not planned'
    2. ATP attribute = If it's needed for atp, its collected.
    There is a third attribute, but I don't quite remember and would need to look at the code. I believe it may be the forecast control attribute which would determine if it could be forecasted.
    Try deselecting the values above and the item should not be collected.
    Regards,
    Kevin

  • Launch ASCP plan run very long time

    Hi,
    I launched constrained ASCP plan and it took very long time. I launch ASCP plan in friday and it still not finished yet till monday, Memory Based Shapshot & Snapshot Delete Worker are still running, Loader Worker With Direct Load Option is still in pending phase. MSC: Share Plan Partitions has been set to Yes.
    When I run query below :
    select table_name,
           partition_name
    from   all_tab_partitions
    where  table_name like 'MSC_NET_RES_INST%'
    OR     table_name like 'MSC_SYSTEM_ITEMS%'
    order by substr(partition_name,instr(partition_name,'_',-1,1)+1);
    The results are:
    MSC_SYSTEM_ITEMS
    SYSTEM_ITEMS_0
    MSC_NET_RES_INST_AVAIL
    NET_RES_INST_AVAIL_0
    MSC_SYSTEM_ITEMS
    SYSTEM_ITEMS_1
    MSC_SYSTEM_ITEMS
    SYSTEM_ITEMS__21
    MSC_NET_RES_INST_AVAIL
    NET_RES_INST_AVAIL__21
    MSC_NET_RES_INST_AVAIL
    NET_RES_INST_AVAIL_999999
    MSC_SYSTEM_ITEMS
    SYSTEM_ITEMS_999999
    Please help me how to increase the performance when launching the plan. Is change MSC: Share Plan Partitions to No the only way to increase the performance in running plan?
    Thanks & Regards,
    Yolanda

    Hi Yolanda,
    a) So does it means that plan was working fine earlier but you are facing this issue recently.. ? If so then what you have changed at server side or have you applied any recent patches.. ?
    b) If you have not completed plan for single time,
    I will suggest that run data collection in complete refresh mode for one organization which is having relatively small data. Further, you can modify plan options in order to reduce planning calculation load like
    - disable pegging
    - remove any demand schedule / supply schedule / global forecast etc
    - enable only single organization which having relatively small demand and supply picture
    - disable forecast spread
    Once one plan run will be completed, then expand your collection scope to other organizations and also enabling above mentioned setting.
    There are lots of points need to consider for performance issue like server configuration, hardware configuration,  num of demands etc. So you can raise SR in parallel while working on above points.
    Thanks,
    D

  • Sourcing rule in constrained ascp plans

    hi !
    in an unconstrained ascp plan the planned order split for purchased items happens as per the sourcing rules defined however in the constrained plan when the constraints are not defined for the supplier the planned order split does not follow the sourcing rules.
    what is the cause of the same
    thanks in advance

    Hi,
    set the maximum order qty for org 101 to '0'
    make sure to tick the 'use alternate source' option from the plan options
    Regards,
    Duco

  • Can the inventory orgs of OU2 be used in the OU1 in teh ASCP plan...

    Hello Gurus,
    I defined an ASCP plan in one of the operating units OU1 and i have used all the inventory organizations for that ASCP plan which is definde in the OU1.
    There is an aonther Operating Unit OU2 where in some inventory orgs cater products to OU1.............
    Can i use the inventory organization of the OU2 to be used in the ASCP plan that i have defined in the OU1
    Please help me in clarifying this doubt at the earliest

    ASCP does not care about OU's. It only looks at inventory organizations.
    enable the org for collections in the ASCP instances form and set org access for the responsibility used in the organization security form (Adv Planning Administrator)

  • Not validating against LOV if the field is not null

    hi all,
    i am using form6i.
    i have two fields called p_code,p_doc.
    p_code is optional and p_doc is mandatory. Both the fields is having LOV. Based on the p_code, p_doc should be filtered.
    both fileds i have given validate_from_list true.
    if user entered some values and processed after that without clearing the fields(p_doc) if user enters the data p_code the values in the LOV for p_doc is filtering(refreshing) but the value is not validate against the LOV.
    that means
    p_code p_doc
    aa 123
    bb 456
    first time for the code 'aa' the p_doc value was 123. now again user entered bb so that in the lov p_doc 456 is present but in the item still 123 is there. If user press the ENTER or TAB the cursor is going to next field with out valudating the value in the p_doc(old value is 123 but it should replace by 456) but is not showing any error also.
    if my requirement is not clear.please let me know.
    Thanks..

    Because the value in P_DOC is not getting validate. How about trying the below code in WHEN-VALIDATE-ITEM trigger of P_CODE
    :P_DOC:=:P_DOC;-Ammad

  • Since last software update, pre-paid internet does not work anymore. Get "you have not signed up for a data plan" message. Pre-paid acct is in order! What's up???

    I have had  an iPad 3G for more than a year now. I did not get it with a SIM card, since I expected to use almost completely at home, where we have wireless internet. Eventually, I decided  it would be handy to be able to take it on the road, and signed up for pre-paid Internet with KPN (national Dutch telecommunications company). That worked fine, until the last big iPad software update. Since then, whenever I try to make a connection outside the house, I get the following message…
    Mobile Data Account
    You have not signed up for a data plan.
    Would you like to set up a new account?
    If you don’t, you can do it later in Settings.
    …with the options of ‘Later’ or ‘Now’ to press. If I press Now, I get a screen “Please wait while the page is loading – this should only take a few seconds to complete.” But it never does, the ball just keeps spinning and spinning and spinning….
    To my mind, with pre-paid internet I should not HAVE to set up a Mobile Data Account in the first place. I’ve checked with KPN, and my account is completely in order. I’ve checked with the local Apple store, and the geniuses say they’ve never seen this. Can anyone help me?

    I updated to 3.6.4 and when I went to NetFlix to watch the next show of a series, it said
    something like
    Installation complete, restart your browser.
    I restarted browser, same problem. Restarted comp. Same problem.
    I updated Adobe Flash 10.1, still same problem.
    But able to watch some vids on other sites, but full screen gave me the big blank white screen with audio only, had to click around in the dark ( so to speak) to find the minimize button.
    I did a System Restore to before the Firefox and Adobe updates.
    I then did not update Firefox as recommended and went to NetFlix and wellah, i can view the movies again.
    And Full Screen is fine.
    I then experimented and updated Firefox only, went to NetFlix and got same msg with no viewable shows.
    So did a System Restore once more.
    Staying at 3.6.3 for a while longer until I know I can watch my movies.
    I don't own a TV, so this is my only form of an occasional escape.
    I do hope this is figured out soon.
    With what I have done, it seems to be Firefox, Not Flash.
    Good Luck to us all.

  • ERROR: "info.plist does not validate against DTD"

    Hi! I got this error if anyone has it solved Please HELP.
    I am trying to package a WRT widget using Nokia WRT extension for Adobe Dreamweaver. This is the place for info on the extension: http://www.forum.nokia.com/Tools_Docs_and_Code/Tools/Runtimes/Web_Runtime/
    I figure developer from here who use DW to develop mobile content might know the error.
    When come to the step of 'Package Nokia WRT Widget' I got this error: info.plist does not validate against DTD
    and a page of error info shown like this:
    DTD validated at: Wed Jun 17 2009 19:03:00 GMT+0800 (Malay Peninsula Standard Time)
    DTD used for validation: http://www.nokia.com/DTDs/plist-1.0.dtd
    Line
    Column
    Message
    Explanation
    Source
    2
    95
    DTD did not contain element declaration for document type name
    3
    16
    Attribute "version" exists, but can not be used for this element.
    3
    21
    element "plist" undefined. Did you mean "applet" or "strike"?
    4
    7
    element "dict" undefined. Did you mean "strike" or "input"?
    5
    7
    element "key" undefined. Did you mean "strike" or "blockquote"?
    6
    10
    element "string" undefined. Did you mean "strong" or "strike"?
    7
    7
    element "key" undefined. Did you mean "strike" or "blockquote"?
    8
    10
    element "string" undefined. Did you mean "strong" or "strike"?
    9
    7
    element "key" undefined. Did you mean "strike" or "blockquote"?
    10
    10
    element "string" undefined. Did you mean "strong" or "strike"?
    11
    7
    element "key" undefined. Did you mean "strike" or "blockquote"?
    12
    10
    element "string" undefined. Did you mean "strong" or "strike"?
    13
    7
    element "key" undefined. Did you mean "strike" or "blockquote"?
    14
    9
    element "true" undefined. Did you mean "textarea" or "tr"?
    Can anyone knows what this means and how i can solve it?
    Please help. Thankyou.
    note: I am new here and knows that keep asking quesion without giving back is not good but I have a deadline here and wanted to finish the job. I will read some other post and try to help in return when I am able to do so.

    Hi pziecina,
    Thanks for your reply,
    I suspect my problem is the installation or setup of my system or software. as the result i tested is not by doing any scripting at all. All I did is following one of their example exactly (http://www.forum.nokia.com/Tools_Docs_and_Code/Tools/Runtimes/Web_Runtime/Dreamweaver_Exte nsion/QuickStart.xhtml) and package strightaway without modifying the code. because I want to make sure i got the extension install correctly. even so by packaging one of their ready make example already yield this error.

  • The  vendor code is not coming against some Assignment line items with the

    Hi All,
    While executing  t.code FBL3N,the  vendor code is not coming against some Assignment line items with the GL A/C4607000, some line items it is coming.
    The GL A/c 4607000 is GR/IR clearing a/c.
    Please let us know  why this situation is happeing at the time of FBL3N.
    Thanks
    Ram

    HI,
    By activating the special fields you can the vendor number, but use the new reprot called "FAGLL03 - Display/Change Items (New) ".
    First go to SPRO> Financial Accounting (New)> General Ledger Accounting (New)--> Master Data > G/L Accounts>Line Items --> Define Special Fields for Line Item Display
    Click on New Entries -
    Table - BSEG - Field - LIFNR
    Save. Now execute the report - FAGLL03 - Display/Change Items (New)
    Give the gl account number and execute.
    After getting the line items list from menu select --Settings --> Special Fields --> Click on New Entries --> Enter Table BSEG, Field Name LIFNR.
    After this come back and execute again. It will give you the vendor number.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Shashi Kanth.

  • Purchase Order Carryforward Does Not Net to Zero

    We are working in a year-end test client, copy of Production, in preparation for fiscal year end closing.
    For purchase order carryforwards, we find a number of documents which do not net to zero in the sender year. This seems to occur most often for the case where a line item has split account assignments. In these cases, only one account assignment line is carried forward. The other account assignment lines are ignored.
    This does not occur for all cases where we have split assignments. We have been unable to determine what is unique about the instances where the carryforward does not work properly.
    Our system is R/3, 4.7, support stack 27.
    Has anyone else encountered this problem? If so, can you give me any guidance as to how to address it?
    Thank you.

    Hello all. Since i didn't get any replies, I don't know if there is any interest in this. However, for future reference, in case any else encounters this issue and searches the forum, here is the answer which we found:
    FMJ2 and FMJ3 process the carryforwards and reversals in blocks of 2000 lines. At the end of a block, the PO may be split up across blocks, with one or more assignment items processed in the first block, and the remaining items in the next block.
    If you have selected "Block Documents" on the initial screen, when the first item is processed, it locks the PO. When the second block attempts to process the remaining items, there is an error that the PO is locked, and these items are not processed.
    The developer is working on a correction to the code to handle this. In the meantime, there are two workarounds:
    1) Uncheck "Block Documents"
    or
    2) After processing, use FMJ3 to reverse the carryforwards which received the error. Use FMJ2 to carry them forward again, in smaller groups which are not large enough to fill up a 2000 line block, and which therefore do not encounter the problem.

Maybe you are looking for