Asset values not coming in depreciation area

Hi Experts,
Following the management requirement we have created a new depreciation area 50 with posting indicator "0".
We found that asset posting from CJ88 (AUC to Final settlement) is not getting updated in depreciation area 50.
Please help me this. Necessary details are mentioned below:-
1. Depreciation area 50 is activated for main asset class but not for CWIP.
2. For depreciation area 50, value maintenance is set as Only Positive values or zero allowed.(Screen shot attached)
3. Transaction type 336 is not restricted to any depreciation area.(Screen shot attached)
Am attaching relevant screen shot.
Thanks in advance

HI Mukhthar,
Thanks for the prompt reply.
In some cases system is updating values in depreciation area 50 even CWIP is not activated but in maximum cases system is not updating the values.
I have carried out the changes in quality by activating depreciation area 50 for CWIP and perform a test case and it works but i want to know the root cause of this issue that why system is behaving like this and how it updates value in some cases.
Please suggest

Similar Messages

Different Asset value dates for different depreciation areas

Hi All
I have a requirement for different capitalization dates in different depreciation areas for some LATAM countries .How can this be achieved?

Hi
Hope you can achive this requirement by entering Depreciation calculation start date in depreciation area tab of asset master against each depreciation area
Depreciation calculation start date
'As a general rule, the system determines the depreciation start date from the asset value date of the first acquisition posting. However, you can also manually enter a calendar date in the asset master record for the start of depreciation. In that case, the system ignores the asset value date of the acquisition posting.'
Please check different scenarios in development system and then do it
Regards
Praveen PC

FA-retirement-Asset value date and posting date are not in same fisc year

Hello,
I would like to post retirement in the new fiscal year but with asset value date in the previous year so that NBV is calculated correctly. It is not possible neither in ABAON nor in ABAVN with any transaction type.
I always get message 'Asset value date and posting date are not in same fiscal year'.
Is there any way how to handle this?
Thank you,
Jan

Hi,
I have tried this but the settings of our Depr keys works in the way. That if you use asset value date in the new month it will calculate depreciation for the whole month.
This means if I retire with asset value date 31.12.2008 - NBV will be calculated as at 31.12.2008.
If I retire with asset value date 1.1.2008 - NBV will be calculated as at 31.1.2009.
Thank you anyway!

Asset value date and posting date are not in same fiscal year

Hi,
Our business user has created an asset under an incorrect asset class, which he is trying to transfer to a new asset whcih was created under correct asset class. However system is restricting user with the error message "Asset value date and posting date are not in same fiscal year". Can you please advise me how we can proceed further with this error.
Regards,
Asam.

Hi,
To transfer one asset to another asset within a company code can be done through ABUMN only.
While doing this transfer you have enter the document date, posting date, and value date for the transaction, but all these dates should be in same fiscal year only.
In your case you must have been entered the dates for asset value date and posting date , and these two dates are in diff financial years.
Please make sure that both the dates are in same FY.
Hope this will fix your issue.
Thanks,
Srinu

IO assigned with Asset,but not coming at the time of PO creation

Hello
IO assigned with Asset,but not coming at the time of PO creation.
I have made following settings:
1     Depreciation - IFRS (INR)              1     0L
15     Income Tax Act                             0
20     Depreciation - Indian GAAP (INR)     3     1L
30     Depreciation - IFRS (USD)              0
31     Depreciation - Indian GAAP (USD)       0
In ACSET-Account assignment:
for dep area-20
CAUFN     Internal Order     *     Generic Trans. Type     02 Depreciation Run
KOSTL     Cost Center     *     Generic Trans. Type     02 Depreciation Run
so currently i am using only dep area-20 only(Indian GAAP)
CAPEX budgeting is through IO. AUC is not doing through IO,its directly from AIAB/AIBU
AS01
KO01
AS02
KO22
KO30
so what is the problem,why i am not getting IO (which is in display mode in PO) when assigned the Asset with category of "A" (asset) in PO.......when i assigned Asset- the GL account come automatically but IO didn't come.
kind regards

Hey Ajay
thanks for your reply.....
now i'm getting new error:
Parallel depreciation area 31 is not posted
     Message no. AA565
Diagnosis
     The asset to be posted does not manage parallel depreciation area 31, or
     transaction type that you are using is limited to certain depreciation
     areas, and does not contain depreciation area 31. This is incorrect.
System Response
     Posting is rejected.
Procedure
     Check the asset and the transaction type.
I have checked some configuration but not able to debug it.
regards

To Reduce Asset Value Which has Run Depreciation

Hi,
I have a request to reduce asset value, but the asset has run depreciation for three month in the system, I want to know how to reduce the asset value and recalculate previous depreciation posted value of the asset?
Please share the detailed procedure within the thread, if can provide the manual for this case step by step, it's better! Thanks in advance.
All suggestion will be awarded.
Tao

Hi Tao,
Do you want to reduce the Asset value from $10,000 to $ 5,000? If so, please post a Credit entry to the asset account.
        pstg
CR    75       Asset account         ****
DR    40       Concerned account ****
If you are in the same year, then the system would recalculate the Depr and post the difference in the next Depr run. But if you are in the different FY, then post a write up depr for the Asset value reduced (Depr on $5,000 in previous FY). Use t-code ABZU to post the write up.
Please revert in case you have any questions.

Updating fully depreciated assets during creation of subsequent depreciation area

I am subsequently adding multiple depreciation areas in SAP. The system has been live for many years with a legacy system handling the depreciation for the tax books via dual maintenance. I have been able to bring in the new areas via AFBN without issue except for one thing. Many of these assets are fully depreciated in Book01 in SAP but they have remaining tax life. The problem is when the asset is fully depreciated and I assign it cost or try to make a change in the depreciation area tab it automatically fully depreciates those values.
Has anyone ran into this before? What options are there to provide a solution?
To recap; Want to add tax book values to assets already live in SAP. Issue is assets already fully depreciated. Any adjustment to keys and UL on them results in a calculation but regardless it fully depreciates whatever that amount will be.
Many thanks,
Jack

Hi Jack,
I suppose, there are some settings somewhere, which do not allow the asset to have values.
Presumption:
1) AFAMA - Base method -Treatment of end of life: In the depreciation key: there is not "dep. after pland. life end" allowed
2) In OADB there are wrong settings (perhaps no positive acquisition values allowed)
3) Perhaps this is constitutional area and in OADB there is rule for the derived area which is broken.
Best regards Bernhard

PR/ Sales order value not coming in condition value routine

As per the requirement while creating a PO I need to add a new condition type and need to calculate condition price for this newly added condition based on some matrix.
For this requirement PO will always be created with reference to PR and with account assignment category as 'E' .
(Hence sales order number /item will be copied from PR to PO in account assignment tab )
Now I have created a new pricing requirement routine ( To add the condition type ) and new condition routine to calculate and update the price.
These routines are working fine if i check them with hard coded price values.
But the problem is that I need the PR number(which we put in item overview ) / Sales order item number (from account assignment ). these values are not coming in pricing tables in the routine...structure EKPO come blank, KOMP-AUBEL is also blank).
Please give your suggestions how i can i get PR/ SO in the condition values routine .
Please reply

resolved my self

Mapping Condition issue, Value not coming in multiple segments.

Hi All,
File to Idoc scenario.
My file looks like below.
HD 89650 28/01/11 "Presciber tan"
AF "disc-rsn"
RK "007287001" A
KE disc-code "007287"
KE addr-num "001"
DF w-phone "03 98483299"
AF "drs"
RK "007287" A
KE dr-num "007287"
DF affil "OPSM"
DF country "0"
AF "disc-rsn"
RK "dr-addraddress-1 17287|1EN" A
KE disc-code "008287"
KE field-name "address-1"
KE element " 1"
T 16
Condition:
I have a condition where I need to create an Idoc segment Z1disc when row - "AF "disc-rsn"" exists.
For the filed "Z1disc-CODE", I need to pass the value when row "KE disc-code" exists,
Result:
From my file, AF "disc-rsn" exists twice, so I created 2 Z1disc segments.
Coming to the field "Z1disc-CODE", the value "KE disc-code" exists twice in the file. After mapping, the value is coming only once in the first segment. The field "CODE" is not coming in the second segment like below.
Idoc
-- Zdisc
--- Lang -- E
--- Code -- "007287"
---Zdisc
Lang -- E
When the check the display queue, it is showing like below
SUPPRESS
007287
007287 -- (Context)
008287
008287-- (Context)
It showing correctly from display queue, but the value are not populating except in first segement.
For your information, After content conversion, my source xml will look like below.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
- <ns:MT_Optum xmlns:ns="http://luxottica.com/SAP_CRM/DirectSales/OptomDiscount">
- <RecordSet>
<Row>HD 89650 28/01/11 "Presciber tan"</Row>
</RecordSet>
- <RecordSet>
<Row>AF "disc-rsn"</Row>
</RecordSet>
- <RecordSet>
<Row>RK "007287001" A</Row>
</RecordSet>
- <RecordSet>
<Row>KE disc-code "007287"</Row>
Kindly help me, I'm trying all the options and it is not working.
Is there anything I need to change in Source structure?
Thanks
Deepthi.

Hi Aravind,
Here is my Source message.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
- <MT_XIOptum>
- <Header>
<HRow>HD 89650 28/01/11 "Presciber tan"</HRow>
</Header>
- <Detail>
<Row>AF "disc-rsn"</Row>
<Row>RK "007287001" A</Row>
<Row>KE disc-code "007287"</Row>
<Row>KE addr-num "001"</Row>
<Row>DF fax-num ""</Row>
<Row>DF in-out "I"</Row>
<Row>DF phone-2 ""</Row>
<Row>DF post-code "3108"</Row>
<Row>DF provider-num "4349201J"</Row>
<Row>DF rec-stat "A"</Row>
<Row>DF w-phone "03 98483299"</Row>
<Row>AF "drs"</Row>
<Row>RK "007287" A</Row>
<Row>KE dr-num "007287"</Row>
<Row>DF affil "OPSM"</Row>
<Row>DF country "0"</Row>
<Row>DF descript "KK"</Row>
<Row>DF rec-stat "A"</Row>
<Row>AF "disc-rsn"</Row>
<Row>RK "dr-addraddress-1 17287|1EN" A</Row>
<Row>KE disc-code "008287"</Row>
<Row>KE field-name "address-1"</Row>
<Row>KE element " 1"</Row>
</Detail>
- <Trailer>
<TRow>T 25</TRow>
</Trailer>
</MT_XIOptum>
Row> -> [removeContext] ->[ equalsS "disc-rsn" ] -> [createIf] -> <Zdisc>
This Part is working.
<Row>> startWith2>IF
KE disc-code-->THEN > removeContexts>SplitbyValue>SUBSTRING>Code.
When I check the display queue at Code. I'm getting the below values.
SUPPRESS
007287
007287 -- Context change
008287
008287-- Context Change
Only 007287 is displaying in FIrst segment "Z1Disc" and second value "008287" not coming in second segment "Z1Disc".
Anything is wrong?

Copa report values not coming in report

hi Gurus
In copa Values are not coming in report.
where is the problem
can anybody suggest
bye
Ramesh Reddy

Hi Ramesh,
First u check with whether the COPA is integrated with other modules or not? that means with fi/mm and co and SD...

Values not coming on export invoice

Dear all,
While creating Excise invoice for exports i am not getting excise values in document because i have not maintained condition types in Export pricing procedure.
Now i have maintained Condition types in Export Pricing procedure both percentage and quantity condition types of excise and i kept all as statistical, even though the values were not coming to J1IIN and my client require excise values on print at the same time values has to come on ARE-1 document also
can anybody guide me how values has to come on both these documents 1. Export Excise invoice 2.ARE-1 document.
regards
venkata

Refer SAP Note No. 822226 for code correction.
Regards,
Dilip Shende

AA implement aaset value for only one depreciation area

Hi,
Is it possible change acquisition value of asset for only one depreciation area, the area 20 for example?
By point of view of FI I can post the accounts of area 20 by trx OASV,
but in AA how can I do?
If I use the trx AB01 the acquisition value is modified in every area.
Any assistance would be greatly appreciated.

You upload the values in AM with the transaction AS91, this don't create postings in FI. It is possible to upload different values by depreciation area.
With the transaction OASV you create manual the total postings in FI. An other option is to use the transaction ABF1 (search on this forum with ABF1 how it is working)
When an area post direct you have to use the transaction OASV (asset account is reconcilation accounts) for the other area you can use a standard FI posting.
When you use AB01 you can create you own transaction type and limet them to one depreciation area or a group (tray to play with Tty 147, there you can fill in amounts by depreciation area.)

Excise invice -values not coming

i have create billing & accounting doc is generated -bed /cess are posted.
but when i'm creating excise invoice with ref to billing bed /cess values are not coming in excise invoice
J1IIN
pl SUGGEST

Hi
Please check in your billing document against all your excise condition types you have duty values.
If billing document does not contain duty values then obviously system will not bring the duty values in your excise invoice (J1IIN).
If you have duty values in your billing document then still excise invoice is not copied to your excise invoice then please check the below customization setting:
MG>Logistics General>Tax on goods movements>India>Basic settings>Determination of excise duty>Maintain Excise defaults:
Here ensure that all your excise condition types are properly maintained for your TAX PROCEDURE.
Example if you are using JEXP-BED, JECS-ECS, JA1X-SeCess condition type in your pricing procedure.
Then check you have maintained as follows:
BED COND (A/R BED)..........JEXP
A/R BED Perc (BED Perc)......JEXP
A/R ECS Cond..........JECS
A/R ECS Perc ..........JECS
A/R AT1 Cond...........JA1X
A/R AT1 Perc............JA1X.
The above setting is required only if you are using percentage condition type. If you are using both percentage and Total condition type. Then it has to be classified as below. JEXT-BED JECP-ECS and JA1Y-SeCess.. These are total condition types.
BED COND (A/R BED)..........JEXT
A/R BED Perc (BED Perc)......JEXP
A/R ECS Cond..........JECP
A/R ECS Perc ..........JECS
A/R AT1 Cond...........JA1Y
A/R AT1 Perc............JA1X.
Regards
MBS

Feature Table values Not coming in order in MDM

Hi
We have a problem with one of our extracts.
There is a qualified table called "Feature". And in syndication map we are extracting some models which have associated "Feature" values.(30 values).
In data manager i can see the features associated with a model. And associated "Sequence numbers" of all these Features.
But while syndication extract the Features are not coming in XML according to the sequence number.
The order of features is not same as the Sequence numbers displayed in data manager.
Can anyone help me to find the cause of this . Do i need to make change anywhere else to make the extract according to the Sequence number?
Your quick response is greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Dhanish Joseph

Hi Dhanish,
Syndicator always tries to send the records in the same order as you see in the Records pane of the syndicator.
In data manager,when you were trying to search based on the qualified table, you must have sorted them in sequence (by clicking on the field on the records pane) and the same thing might not be sorted in syndicator.
Please check if this is the case and sort the records in syndicator based on your qualified field and you will get the syndication files in the desired sequence.
Regards,
Sravan

Asset capitalization in specific ledgers/depreciation areas

Scenario: Example:
Leading Ledger 0L: IFRS- Book depreciation 01 in AA u2013Posting to GL
Non Leading Ledger Z0: US GAAP Depreciation Area 04 in AA- Posting to GL
Non leading ledger Z1 :JP GAAP: No depreciation area in AA ( We donu2019t want to capitalize in this ledger)
All initial APC postings are updating in all ledgers even though no depreciation area for non leading ledger Z1 in asset accounting. We donu2019t want to post non leading ledger Z1. Example: Lease Assets- we need to capitalize only in leading ledger.
Do we need to maintain separate depreciation areas for each accounting principle?
What is the best approach for this issue?

Hello ,
Please be aware that real time postings on the leading ledger goes
to all ledgers. This is standard functionality. To change this would
require a modification to the ABAP code.
You can go to help.sap.com to check the documentation:
FI -> Asset -> Integration -> Parallel Account in Asset Accounting ->
Making Settings for Parallel Ledgers in FI-AA
Also the ledger scenario in your company code should have set up a
smiliar looking to this:
AREA     TEXT            POST TO GL                             LEDGER
01       Local GAAP     1 (Real time)                            0L
05       abcdefg         3 (Depreciation only)                    L2
33       DELTA AREA      5 or 6 (APC only or Only APC directly)   L2
Please can you check again in your system if your ledger scenario is
set up like above example putting your attention to the posting
indicator of each area involved in the matter
Acquisition/transf/retirement postings in area 01
go to all ledgers independently of your setting in OADB and, if any
difference occurs between area 01 an area XX this is posted trough
the derived area YY (posting indicator 6).
regards
Ray

Asset values not coming in depreciation area

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for