Assign functional location to operations of work orders

Hi PM experts,
I want to assign a different funcional location to each operation of a work order.
Is it possible??? How can I do that???
Thanks in advance.

Do the config in IMG => PM & CS => Maintenance & Service Processing => Maintenance & Service Orders => Functions => Define Notification & Order Integration
There for your order type, Select Assignment of Technical Objects to Operations Active.
Note: One operation can be assigned to only one functional location. If you want to assign one operation for 2 FLs, its not possible. You should define 2 different operations.
In maintenance order, in Objects tab, select the FLs. Select first FL & click Assignment button at the bottom. In pop up window, you will get the list of operations. Select the operation & assign that for the FL.

Similar Messages

  • Euipment or Function location field Mandatory in Work Order

    Hi
    How to make either Equipment or Function location ( either of the one) mandatory in Work Order.
    Thanks ini advance
    Thiyagarajan

    Hi ,
    The field equipment or f.loc can be made mandatory using transaction variants  -- but it would be applicable for all order types .....
    1.use tcode SHD0 , give IW31 in Transaction code and ZIW31 in transaction variants and press create ..
    2.this would take you to IW31 initial screen and enter planning plant and order types and press enter this would give the dialog box of screen variant .Here press continue and this would take you to inside screen .
    3.Here you again press enter and by entering some required data you can finally reach to screen variant of reference object
    and can mark the equipment or f.loc field mandatory as required .
    4.Once this is finished you can you can select local object and save ... and come back and test the same ... now this trans varint ZIW31 can be assigned to user group ...
    go thru the documentation of SHD0 for bette information
    regards
    pushpa

  • Rules for defining operations in Work Orders

    What is the best practice for defining work order operations for better knowledge retention. How we can distinguish multiple operations in work order?
    Our maintenance stuff is defined single operation like replacement of bearing in work order which is of no use for knowledge retention. What measures/guidelines should be taken in this regard?
    Regards,
    Tehsin

    Hi Tehsin
    Technically every one has answered correctly, however I would like to add few points
    1. I completely agree with Shri Maheswaran that operations shall be created on broad heads & only differentiated basd on diffrent activity type(for different wage grp) or Performing work center or according different broad activity (functional) which has specific relevance.
    2. As a best practice we have created standard maintenance practice (SMP) which contains details of activity for say replacement of motor which normally do not changeover period & attach this document to technical object in DMS. Further we have standardised operations using standard text key e.g. Replace motor type xxx, xxkW / Maintain motor type xxx/ Maintain panel etc.
    At most we have included the broad sub activities as operations or in long text as per requirement but not how parts because how part will always remains same (untill & unless objct changes or there is any revision of the document). If you want the status of completion of your broad activities as mailestones then also you shall create it as operation or sub operation. If you put it in long text you will not get separate status.
    Regards
    Shakti

  • Need to confirm actual time for 2 persons on one operation  in work order( PM)

    Need to confirm actual time for 2 persons on one operation  in work order( PM)

    Hi Abdullatif Siam,
    If you can move your discussion to the relevant space, possibility of people responding to you would be more..
    May be you move your post here -- Enterprise Asset Management --> http://scn.sap.com/community/eam
    BR
    Prabhith

  • Can an assigned PO use more than one work order?

    Can an assigned PO use more than one work order?

    Hi,
    Please avoid duplicate posting in the forum. You already an active thread which is in progress. there is possibility that Moderators might lock your threads.
    Thanks,
    Sudhakar
    Message was edited by: Sudhakar Pappu
    Next time please mark for moderation so duplicates can be removed - thanks I have locked this thread
    Regards
    Virendra
    Message was edited by: Virendra Pal

  • Making Storage Location field mandatory in Work Order

    Hi
    As per our proces, if PR is created from work order and if there is no storage location in work order then PO will have warehouse address as a shipping address. So it is expected that PR must have storage location details when it is created from work order to avoid incorrect shipping address in PO.
    So, I want to make storage location field mandatory in components tab of work order.
    Also I want to avoid the users to deliberately removing the storage location and making it blank.
    Regards
    Prakash

    Hi,
      You will have to use one of the below mentioned user exits  to accomplsih this requirement.
    CNEX0026 Maintenance order: General check for material
    CNEX0027 Maintenance order: Determination of plant or storage location for component
    Thanks
    Narasimhan

  • Preferred Suppliers for OSP operation during Work order Release

    Hi Gurus,
    We have a requirement in one of our implementation. Client wants to provide the preferred supplier for the OSP operation, so that the requisition needs to be created with that supplier and the price should be taken from the USAGE of the OSP resources.
    Anyone worked on this requirement before., please let me know the feasible options.,

    Here is the code:
        REFRESH : lt_afvgd.
    Getting Operation details
        CALL FUNCTION 'CO_BO_OPR_OF_ORDER_GET'
          EXPORTING
            aufnr_imp = caufvd_imp-aufnr
          TABLES
            afvgd_get = lt_afvgd.
        IF caufvd_imp-AUART = lc_auart1 or caufvd_imp-AUART = lc_auart2 .
    Determination of Work Centre for Operation Relevent To PTE Eng.
          CLEAR : ls_afvgd.
          READ TABLE lt_afvgd INTO ls_afvgd WITH KEY usr00 = 'PTE'.
          IF sy-subrc eq 0.
            ls_afvgd-arbpl  = caufvd_imp-VAPLZ.
            ls_afvgd-WERKS  = caufvd_imp-VAWRK.
            MODIFY lt_afvgd  FROM ls_afvgd TRANSPORTING arbpl WERKS WHERE usr00 = 'PTE'.
          ENDIF.
        endif.
    **-- Updating operations buffer
        CALL FUNCTION 'CO_BO_UPDATE_OPR_OF_ORDER'
          TABLES
            afvgd_upd = lt_afvgd.

  • Two notifications attached to single work order

    Hi..
    I have a scenario where two notifications are attached to single PM work order. The user created two notifications for the same functional location and created a work order for the first notification using IW34. Now this work order has both the notification attached to it and in the change log of the notifications, i can see the order was attached to both notifications on the same time.
    If someone could provide a valid explanation, it would be much appreciated.
    Thank you

    Greetings Mina,
    It's perfectly possible to create an Order for multiple Notifications, although only one Notification can be assigned to the Order header. The additional assignments are through the Object tab, as Jogeswara Rao Kavala observed.
    It is a valid scenario, for example:
    - two operations workers report two Notifications in different objects, which have the same root cause and will be fixed by the same maintenance work (for instance, no medium in the piping along the installation can be because a particular pump that feeds the piping is malfunctioning)
    ...or
    - the same fault is independently reported on multiple Notifications (for example, operator on the 2nd shift registers a Notification for the pump; then on the 3rd shift the other operator registers the same fault, not having noticed there's one Notification already; on the day shift, the Maintenance supervisor sees the 2 Notifications and creates a common order for both).
    This allows you to better track Notifications against the Orders that are resolving them.
    It is possible to do this in several ways:
    - in IW22 by the menu option "Assign order"
    - in IW28 by selecting many Notifications on the ALV list and selecting "Create Order" icon
    - in IW32 from the Order object tab

  • Populating Maint wrk Ctr through Functional Location(FL) in order

    Hi,
    we are facing one issue like when we are entering the Fucntional locaiton on the initial screen of IW31 and then enter the order the Maint wrk ctr related to the functional location gets copied under the field in Header tab.But when we enter the FL inside the header and not at initial screen then it is not copying the Maint wrk ctr from FL to that order.
    What could be the reason?
    Plz help

    Hi Aachal,
    I can say when you declare Function location initially that means " You are creating an order on that function location " so SAP will pull the data related to object and shows on header.
    And When you are declaring Function location in IW31 ( Header Screen ) the " You are assigning function location to Order , and might be you are going to use different work center for this maintenance " so SAP will not populate reference object info there.
    Hope this will help you.
    Riyaj

  • From Work Order Functional area not Updating in MM & FI Documents During GI

    Hi All
    In work order functional area is getting updated in additional data tab from functional location. In functional location we have the work center and this work center is assigned to cost center. In this cost center we maintain the functional area & profit center.
    from there it is updating in the work order. But in MM & FI documents the functional area is showing as blank we are facing this issue for only one work order for other work orders the functional area is updating in MM & FI documents.
    Thanks & Regards
    VIshvesh Saodekar
    Edited by: Vishvesh Saodekar on Nov 8, 2010 12:43 PM

    I have posted thread in PLM forum

  • Can I create 1 repair order for many equipments / functional locations?

    Dear Experts,
    I'm trying to create 1 single order for many equipments in different functional locations but it seems like the fields for "equipment" and "functional location" in Operation tab are not allowed to enter.
    What is the Tcode to open up those fields?
    Or is there any other ways of doing?
    regards,
    Abraham

    1. Object list Activate
    IMG => PM & CS => Maintenance & Service Processing => Maintenance & Service Orders => Functions & Settings => Define notification & Order Integration
    Select Assignment of operations to Object List entries active in Enh. Object list column for your order type.
    2. Then create the order in IW31. Assign all the equipments in object list tab. Define the operations in operation tab. Go to object list & select equipment one by one & click Assignments button in the bottom. In pop-up window, select the operations for that particular equipment. One operation can be assigned to only one operation. If same operation requires for more than one equipment, then different operation rows should be defined.
    3. Click Settlement rule button in the top (If you want to create settlement rule manually). Based on your equipment entry in object list, enter the cost center & % of cost to be settled.
    4. If you want to automate settlement rule creation, as mentioned in previous posts, use the user exits. Transaction code for user exit is SMOD. ABAP people will write the code based on your input for settlement rule creation.

  • Functional location to Service order

    Guys
    Is it possible whenever a functional location is created, through background i want to generateone service order aganist the functional location.
    For this any BADI or User Exit is there ?
    Ravikumar

    Ravi,
    Yes, I would use the PERFORM YOUR_FORM ON COMMIT syntax to ensure the functional location is created before the order is created.
    If this doesn't work, then you could either use a batch program to create the service order, or use a synchronous workflow task.
    Either way it will require ABAP programming
    PeteA
    [www.pjas.com]

  • Functional locations from order to notification

    Hello
    We have a small problem regarding how the functional location field in the notification is filled. The user creates an order Iw31, and on his peronal settings there is defined a value for functional location, the top of a hierarchy. In the order he changes this value to the correct functional location, and everything else in the order, then he saves it and a notification is created (for some ordertypes) in that notification the functional location is not from the order, but from the personal settings, if we remove the personal settings the notification is updated correct. Is there a way to get it updated correct without removing the value from the personal setting?
    Ivar

    Its not possible when you set User Default values settings. Check the below links.
    From SAP Help:
    If you create notifications in which certain data is always the same, you can permanently define certain user default values to make it easier to create the notifications. The system automatically copies this default data into the appropriate notification fields. You can, however, overwrite the proposed information.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_470/helpdata/en/3c/abc57c413911d1893d0000e8323c4f/content.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/2d/352680448c11d189420000e829fbbd/content.htm

  • How to change the main work center and  work center of each operation when generating work order by maintenance plan

    Dear experts,
    I face a problem that system get main work center from equipment master data as a default main work center in maintenance plan when creating maintenance plan. however, if main work center in equipment is changed later, the change will not synchronize to related maintenance plan. if work order is generated from maintenance plan, main work order in order is defaulted from maintenance plan instead of updated work center in equipment.
    another problem is that, for those orders generated by maintenance plan, the work centers in  operations is defaulted from task list in maintenance plan. in most case, work center in task list is dummy. Actually the work is done by work center in equipment master data.
    My expectation is how to auto replace the main work center and work center of operations in work order with the one in equipment master data if order is generated by maintenance plan? is there any standard configuration or enhancement/BADi that can help with this requirement?
    thanks！
    Wesley

    Wesley,
    Sorry - development is the only way.
    Another option is to create a batch program that runs before your IP30 run(s) and updates any maintenance items and task lists with the correct work centres.
    PeteA

  • Work orders and updating user status (via IW32)

    Hello All,
    I was given a design to create a program that will retrieve all open work orders. The program needs to check on all the purchase orders for that work order to check if order quantity matches the received quantity and the invoice quantity. If it matches, I will do an IW32 to change the user status to 'AIP' (All Invoices Paid). If there are no invoices or purchase orders, I will again, do an IW32 to change the user status to 'AIP'.
    And since this is my first time to work on a PM ticket, I'm not very familiar with the tables being used. I've tried looking for a list of PM tables. One table I got is AUFK (Order Master Data). I searched through the table and it has the fields for Sales Order Number (KDAUF) and Item Number (KDPOS). Is this the Purchase Order related to the work order? Also, is there a way I can see or verify it through a transaction? I tried looking into transaction IW33 but I couldn't find any Purchase Order Number there. Also, how do you know if a work order is open or not? Is there a field that indicates it?
    I was thinking if there are any BAPI's I can use to change a work order's user status instead of doing a CALL TRANSACTION 'IW32'? I saw a function module, RFC_CHANGE_PM_ORDER, that does a remote function call to IW32 but this has dialogs. I'd appreciate any input.
    Many thanks in advance!
    Regards,
    Kristine

    Hi
    You can use the BAPI - BAPI_ALM_ORDER_MAINTAIN to maintain orders.
    Given below few order related tables
    AUFK     -Production order headers
    AFIH     -Maintenance order header
    AUFM     -Goods movement for prod. order
    AFKO     -Order header data PP orders
    AFPO     -Order item
    RESB     -Order componenten
    AFVC     -Order operations
    AFVV     -Quantities/dates/values in the operation
    AFVU     -User fields of the operation
    AFFL     -Work order sequence
    AFFH     -PRT assignment data for the work order(routing)
    JSTO     -Status profile
    JEST     -Object status
    AFRU     -Order completion confirmations
    This may help you.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Govind.

Maybe you are looking for