ATP - Checking Rule

Hi friends,
i created a New checking rule (ZB) in /NOMGP - stock transfer sch. agmnt. for inter company stock transfer. i attached it with a checking group(Z0) and made scope of check. And assigned with doc type LU, supplying plant, delivery type NLCC & checking rule (ZB). the Z0 checking group is assigned in mat master in sales org/plant view.
After creating delivery (VL10*) , in dlv i am getting Checking rule as "B". so i am not getting the ATP checks as per Z0-ZB setting. (checking group is coming correctly from mat master).
Can I get the checking rule ZB ??? in Delivery (environment -->availability )

Hi,
just maintain the same cheking group in mrp3 view of materailmaster also
and then try
hope it helps
reward if useful
rohit

Similar Messages

ATP: check rule AE in place of A when creating sales document

Hello,
when creating a sales order in the sand box, the ATP check rule was "A".
when creating a sales oorder in the development box, the ATP check rule is AE.
The product, the order type, the ATP configuration are completely similar.
I red on the forum that the check rule is determined by the system without any customizing reason.
But in this case, there must be a reason explaining why the system wants us to make assembly order as we do not use PP.
So do you have any idea how this check rule is determined?
Thank you,
Yann

Man I've been trying to figure this out all day. Luckily for you there is a person here who knows more than I do and he was gracious enough to answer my questions. The long & short of it is there is no assignment you can configure or change, the Check Rule is an internal assignment (hard coded) based on the MRP and requirements settings of the material. If you are getting AE then you are using a make-to-order material. Try a different material... one that is not replenishment, consignment or make to order. If you're getting a different rule in 2 different systems with the same materials please share the MM settings of each and we can explore the differences.
This is about as deep as you can get into ATP. Good stuff!

ATP Checking Rule - stock transport sch. agmnt

Hi friends,
i created a New checking rule (ZB) in /NOMGP - stock transfer sch. agmnt. for inter company stock transfer. i attached it with a checking group(Z0) and made scope of check. And assigned with doc type LU, supplying plant, delivery type NLCC & checking rule (ZB). the Z0 checking group is assigned in mat master in sales org/plant view.
After creating delivery (VL10*) , in dlv i am getting Checking rule as "B". so i am not getting the ATP checks as per Z0-ZB setting. (checking group is coming correctly from mat master).
Can I get the checking rule ZB ??? in Delivery (environment -->availability )
thanks in advance
maity

Hi,
just maintain the same cheking group in mrp3 view of materailmaster also
and then try
hope it helps
reward if useful
rohit

ATP checking rule for PM order

Hi friends,
How do I check which ATP rule is being used for Plant maintainence order (PM) order. Using Tcode IW41 we create PM order and do the goods movement type 261.
Error: I have an item ABC with quantity 1 and there exists a deliver for this 1 unit. Still, I am able to issue this part to PM order which should not happen.
Please advise .
Sruthi

SPRO->PM and CS->Maintenance and service processing->Maintenance and service orders->Functions and settings for order type->Availabilty check for material, PRTs and capacity

Block the ATP Stock for non-ATP checked items in BOP

Hello GATP Experts,
We have a strange and interesting scenario here with STOs. Let me explain step by step
1) We don't do ATP check for STOs and hence a Z-check mode has been designed and it will be considered for STO documents
2) Now, let us consider a situation where I have a stock of 100 CS for Material M1 at Plant P1.
3) Let's say, a STO document gets created at 09:00AM in the morning with requested quantity 50 and as it doesn't do ATP check this will be fully confirmed
and consumes 50CS of the stock.
4) So, the net cumulative quantity that is available is 50CS.
5) At 11:00AM,let us say; there is a sales order that was created for a quantity of 100 CS. As the sales document does the ATP check it consumes the only available 50 CS and gets saved with partial confirmaiton situation.
Now, at 12:00 PM - We are running the BOP. When we run the BOP ; what standard SAP does is STO document (as per our business scenario, STOs has higheest priority and they fall on top of the list) gets skipped due to non-ATP check mode and full stock is allocated to the sales order which makes no sense to us which leads to over confirmation situation.
We thought of exluding the STOs from BOP ; however - we end up in not re-scheduling the STO documents which would result in requiring a separate BOP to be run for the STO documents.
FYI - We have contacted SAP and they have confirmed that the above mentioned behavior of the BOP is as designed and it cannot be changed.
Is there any alternative solution for this ? Appreciate your valuable ideas.
Thanks
Babu Kilari

You might have already considered this. pardon if this sounds dumb.
see if you can pass STO's as a receipt in the scope of check for STO's. I presume it is requirement element in your case for ATP checking rule for STO's. Don't include these STO's in sales order checking rules.
This may result in inconsistent ATP logic though. Alternately try creating a Z category for STO and call it a receipt. include this also in the scope of check for STO's.
Try running BOP and see what happens. BOP on its own is not a gurantee that a requirement is always confirmed over another, whatever be the sorting criteria. If there isnt enough stuff, the system has its own internal logic of sorting too which probably treats priority by time of creation of the requirement.
Publish if you meet any success. These ideas are just based on my fancies
Guru

Checking Rule/Special Stock

Hi All,
Our requirement is to have our rush orders, order type ZRU, ignore incoming PO's so that the line will J0 error when there is no available stock in the warehouse. The scope of check allows you to uncheck "Incl. purchase orders" to accomplish this, however you cannot assign a different scope of check per sales order type.
I have tried this workaround: created item category ZRSH (copy of TAN) and maintained special stock of E in customization. I have set ZRSH to be the default item category for order type ZRU. This special stock category will have ZRSH items determine a scope of check for Z2/AE, as opposed to the regular Z2/A. The purchase order indicator was unchecked for Z2/AE.
The problem is that with the special stock E, ZRSH items are not checking regular stock batches during ATP. I have seen table T148, but do not want to start modifying this standard table. Is there a way to have this special stock E look at regular stock? Or is there another way to have a different scope of check for ZRU rush orders?
Thanks for any help,
J

Bibiane,
I apologize for using an undefined abbreviation. Yes, I was referring to the Apparel and Footwear solution.
The functionality (MTO/PTO) you mentioned is common to AFS, I have never seen it used in Basic ERP. I guess you are saying that you do not have the AFS addin installed into your ERP 6 system.
In general, 'A' refers to MTS and 'AE' refers to MTO. The determination of the ATP check is contained within SD order management programs, and is influenced by both master data and SD configuration. I couldn't state with any certainty that I know all the ways that ATP checking rule could possibly be determined.
You are evidently using a custom ATP check (Y5), for which I would be unable to predict the functionality. You are evidently using characteristics/classification about which I have no knowledge to determine SO behavior. You normally would pose these questions to your SD team lead, asking him how he has configured the ATP check to work.
In conclusion, the topics about which you enquire are not really BPX topics, and not topics about which I would consider myself an expert. For best responses, I suggest you close this thread, and reopen in one of the SD forums, such as
SAP ERP Sales and Distribution (SAP SD)
Sorry I can't be of more help,
DB49

ATP check with acknowledged PO 's only

Dear Experts
In ATP checking rule A or B my client does not want to consider all Purchase orders but only those which have been acknowledged by Vendor.
Is there a possibility of this. I do not see any standard setting in configuration to achieve it.
Regards,
Neeraj Srivastava

Hi,
There is no standard SAP functionality can help your scenario.
You can try to use exit EXIT_SAPLATPC_001. You can check with an ABAP'er for possibilities.
Also try to look for OSS notes.
Regards

ATP check with including puchase order

when we create SO with ATP check to reserve the qty of the currenct stock, we also want to know the future qty of purchase orders so that we can clearly know the supply and demand of these materials.
so we use ATP check with including purchase order, that users can reserve the qty of open GR purchase orders.
but when the status of that PO changed, the reserved qty before won't have effect, and can't create outbound delivery either.
there are two examples below:
1. there is one SO reserved 10 material qty of the open GR PO, which it's scheduled delivery date is 5/15. but this PO still hasn't goods receipt until 5/17, cause ATP check rule is "Include future receipts only" ( if "Receipts in the past as well as in the future" is set, it will be confused with current stock qty), so these 10 qty won't have effect and the ATP qty is now a negative. we should only reserve again by t-code V_V2, otherwise all the reserved qty can't be deliveried.
2.there is one SO reserved 10 material qty of the open GR PO, which it's scheduled delivery date is 5/15, but when the delivery date of confirms tab is updated by vendor, these reserved qty before will also be invalid.
please tell me how to resolve these problems?

Hi,
If the business wants to confirm the sales order quantity against the incoming purchase orders, then this always happen. The issue can be resolved only by rescheduling the sales order by running V_V2 everyday.
Alternatively you can suggest the business to exclude the purchase order from availabilty check(AC) in t.code OVZ9 and include shipping notification in it. When the vendor sends some materials confirmation, the purchasing can add the shipping notificatoin details in the purchase order and can create Inbound deliveries for goods receipt. By this way, only when the vendor ships the goods, the quantity will be taken into AC.
Regards,

Rule based ATP check with SOA

Hello,
We wish to implement ATP check using Ent Services.
Details:
Environment : SAP ECC 6.o with Enhancement Package 3/ SCM 5.0
Ent service used: /SAPAPO/SDM_PARCRTRC : ProductAvailabilityRequirementCreateRequestConfirmation
We were able to carry out Product check using the service. However we are unable to carry out rule based ATP check using the same service.
We have carried out the entire configuration as per SAP's building block configuration guide for Global ATP & SAP Note 1127895.
For RBA <Rule based ATP check>, we are getting the results as expected when we create Sales order from SAP R/3 (Transaction VA01), however ATP simulation in APO & Ent service does not give the results as expected. When we carry out ATP simulation in APO / Ent service, results are same as Product check & not as RBA i.e. they respect only requested Product location stock & does not propose alternate Product or Location in case of shortages
Plz share the experience to fix the issue
Mangesh A. Kulkarni

Hi mangesh
Check this links , not very sure , but may help you...
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/wiki?path=/display/erplo/availability%252bchecking%252bin%252bsap
Re: ATP confirmation in CRM
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/wiki?path=/display/scm/rba
Regards
Abhishek

Rule based ATP Check - User Exit to modify the item

Hi all,
We are working with standard rule based ATP check to change the plant in the Sales Order item.
That creates a new subitem with the new plant determination, and changes the Item Category of the original item.
My doubt is: Is there any User Exit in this process to do the system change something else in the Sales Order items?
<< Moderator message - Please do not offer points >>
Thanks!!
Edited by: Rob Burbank on Oct 8, 2010 2:20 PM

Hi Roger,
Please clarify more what do want to change exactly example any Z field to be copied from main item to sub item.
You can use exit USEREXIT_MOVE_FIELD_TO_VBAP , USEREXIT_MOVE_FIELD_TO_VBAK
Thanks,
Pavan Verma

Rule based ATP check

Hello,
We are implementening rule based ATP check for Sales order scnerio. Our Business process is
1.Customer will cretate order for product P1 & Location L1.
If stock is available, system will confirm the order else it should search for alternate product & location in following swquence
2. Product P2, Location L1
3. Product P1, Location L2
4. Product P2, Location L2
We have maintained all the configuration as per SAP bulding block for Rule based ATP check in SAP & APO server.
Problem : If stock for requested Product location is not available, syetem does not propose the stock of alternate product & location as maintained in rule sequence. It gives error as :
"No product found" "Internal error: Item /000000"
Would appreciate if anyone can share information on fixing ths issue?
With Regards
Mangesh A. Kulkarni

hello
We have resolved the issue at our end..
It was due to activation of unwanted exit in APO..
Regards
Mangesh A. Kulkarni

ATP - One Checking group for several checking rules (Trans. OPJJ)

Hello,
In my system, each control group is associated to several checking rules. So, I don't understand how the system choose the right rule to use.
IIs it normal use ? SAP Documentation and forum threads seems to speak always about one checking rule for one checking group.
Thanks for your help,
Emmanuel
Edited by: Kholargol on Oct 2, 2009 11:19 AM

Emmanuel,
Just to add to what Prasobh explained on how to use different check rule 01/02 at production order level there are other checking rules that apply to SD module which is more important for defining ATP stratgey for various finished products.
So a simple sales oder for made to stock product may have checking rule A that considers existing unrestricted stock, purchase orders, production orders dates to promise against.
However a MTO sale order for made to order(MTO) product may have a check rule AE that should consider only the relevant production order and /or replenshipment lead time to promise against.
So while checking group set at material master needs many check rules specific to various Sale orders, production orders, plant mainteneance orders, or project orders.
Hope this helps in your understanding of this concept.
Thanks,
Ram

ATP check for materials and ATP Confirmed Qty's

Good morning,
I have a question regarding the ATP.
If I have a 100 of box a in stock and I have 2 Planned Orders for 75 (total req on box is 150).
When I convert the first Planned Ord to a Prodution Ord, the ATP check will run and confirm that I have the 75 boxes required (as we want it), but if I then convert the second Planned Order I would expect the ATP to say that only 25 is available, but it is also telling me that the 75 boxes required are available.
Can I set the ATP to confirm/allocate the first 75 boxes to the first Production Order and when the second order runs ATP to only commit to 25?
Thanks in advance.
ATP novice :o)

Hi Guy Hall,
Please check with, "include dependent reservation and production order" has been activated for checking rule used for production order at "avilabilty checking scope"
Regards
Pradeep

Relationship about ATP check and credit check

Dear all,
          At present, we have credit control in sales order. The rule is : once the sales order's amount over 1 dollar, the order will be blocked for credit check. This order has to release credit block manually in VKM4.
          Here has a problem, when a sales order has credit released with the status "D", if i check ATP for one item in this order, the credit status will return to "B", it is not match our requirement.
          How can the credit status not change when ATP check happen in the sales order?
         Thanks in advance!

Hi Irene,
You can copy this requirement with new code like :
IF yvbuk-cmgst = 'D'.
      MOVE CHARX TO BYPASS-SECURITY.
      MOVE CHARX TO BYPASS-STATIC_LIMIT.
      MOVE CHARX TO BYPASS-DYNAMIC_LIMIT.
      MOVE CHARX TO BYPASS-DOCUMENTVALUE.
      MOVE CHARX TO BYPASS-CRITICAL_FIELDS.
      MOVE CHARX TO BYPASS-REVIEWDATE.
      MOVE CHARX TO BYPASS-OPEN_ITEMS.
      MOVE CHARX TO BYPASS-OLDEST_OP.
      MOVE CHARX TO BYPASS-DUNNING_LEVEL.
      MOVE CHARX TO BYPASS-USER1.
      MOVE CHARX TO BYPASS-USER2.
      MOVE CHARX TO BYPASS-USER3.
      MOVE CHARX TO status_reset-STATIC_LIMIT.
      MOVE CHARX TO status_reset-DYNAMIC_LIMIT.
      MOVE CHARX TO status_reset-DOCUMENTVALUE.
      MOVE CHARX TO status_reset-CRITICAL_FIELDS.
      MOVE CHARX TO status_reset-REVIEWDATE.
      MOVE CHARX TO status_reset-OPEN_ITEMS.
      MOVE CHARX TO status_reset-OLDEST_OP.
      MOVE CHARX TO status_reset-DUNNING_LEVEL.
      MOVE CHARX TO status_reset-USER1.
      MOVE CHARX TO status_reset-USER2.
      MOVE CHARX TO status_reset-USER3.
    EXIT.
ENDIF.
If you are a problem with yvbuk-cmgst, you can use user exit MV45AFZZ to save the credit status (cmgst) into an other field.
This new field is checked in the new requirement.
This requirement deactivates the credit check if the credit status is released. In this case, no credit check is possible in SO.
Regards,
Lionel

SD- Sales Order - ATP check not working for few item in same sales order

Hi Experts,
Need help we activated ATP check but for few item i could not find confirmation qty after availability check. In same SO out of 4 items for schedule line it confirming qty for 2 item but it's not confirming for remaining 2 items though stock is available. Please guide me how to correst and what need to check.
Manoj

Dear Manoj,
As you know, ATP is a big subject & some times its difficult to point the exact problem.
In your case, I suggest you to execute the function module:BAPI_MATERIAL_AVAILABILITY using Tx:SE37
key in selection criteria , in results check the "ATPQTY"- it will show you how much actual stock is available for use i.e. ATP qtty.
still if you find the availability & system not confirming the qtty, then problem could be in checking rule
Tx:OVZ9 check in relevant combination, whether you are considering RLT or not?
is this case with MTS or MTO
because in Sales order -
for MTS - checking rule "A" & MTO checking rule will be "AE"
Regards,
Reazuddin MD

ATP - Checking Rule

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for