ATP checking rule for PM order

Hi friends,
How do I check which ATP rule is being used for Plant maintainence order (PM) order. Using Tcode IW41 we create PM order and do the goods movement type 261.
Error: I have an item ABC with quantity 1 and there exists a deliver for this 1 unit. Still, I am able to issue this part to PM order which should not happen.
Please advise .
Sruthi

SPRO->PM and CS->Maintenance and service processing->Maintenance and service orders->Functions and settings for order type->Availabilty check for material, PRTs and capacity

Similar Messages

Checking Rule for Process Order

Hi Guys
I am using the standard checking rule for Process Order while releasing. This rule considers the quality blocked stock also as available stock and thus release the Process Order.
However the client does not want to include the quality block stock for process order. My question is:
1. If I create a checking rule which does not consider quality stock as available, and attach it to release of Process Order, will it make any change in MRP run?
2. Is there a means to show a warning message while release of process order to show the stock is in quality block state?
3. Is there any other means to alarm or warn the user before release of Process order about the material quality block state?
Appreciate you help / suggestion on this
Thanks in advance
Rahul

Hi,
Regards the stocks during MRP run, you can do it in tow areas
1. In OPPI, you can define whether Stockin transfer/blocked/restricted stocks can be taken into account for MRP run.
2. You can exclude storage locations in MRP run and assign the MRP storage location indicator as 1 in MRP 4 view.
Apart from this the MRP will consider all stocks and requirements.
If you don't want to consider QI stock (for ex) then you can convert them as blocked stocks or you can move to a storage location which is not assigned to the MRP.
Thanks,
JK

ATP check settings for pl. order: condition on ShipNt Dates

Dear All,
Do you know is there a way to setup ATP check to include Shipping Notification sent from vendors, BUT with condition that such ShipNts should be taken into account ONLY if confirmed dates are not more then X days from planned/production order basic start dates.
regards, Andrey

Dear,
I think it is not possible in standard SAP. I will suggest you post the tread in SD general forum for better reply.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Availability checking rule for sales orders

Hi experts,
To meet our useru2019s requirement I have switched off the availability check at the schedule line category level. But when I created a sales order the AVC is still happening. Upon checking I have noticed the availability checking group as u201C02u201D and checking rule as u201CBu201D in sales order. To my understanding the checking rule should be u201CAu201D for all sales orders. Could you please advise as to why it is happening so?

Hi,
I have done as what suggested and I created a new sales order. Upon checking (Sales screen --} environment --} availability) the availability checking group is 02 and checking rule is B. Please note that for the other sales document types we have, the checking group is 02 and checking rule is A

ATP Rule for Planned Orders

Hi Experts,
I have configured the ATP rule for Planned Orders. So I only want to check the component stock and Production Orders when running ATP check for the Parent Material.
In OPJJ, I only selected the following options.
Include Safety Stock : Ticked
Check without RLT : Ticked
Incl.production orders : X (Take all production Orders into account)
No other options or boxes have been selected
Also I have included the relevant Checking group in MRP 3 for the Parent Material (Checking Rule has been assigned to that Checking Group in Config) and also maintain the Plant Parameters for MRP (assign the checking rule to the plant)
So, For an example :
Parent : A
Components : B and C
Parent Material A has only 5 Planned Orders starting on same day 20.05.2014 each qty 5
Components B got stock 300
Components C got stock 1
When I ran ATP Check for the Parent material A using COHV, qty 1 has been allocated to all the planned orders as committed. Why is this happening ?
I also checked in CO09 for the Component Material C, and it says ATP Qty is only 1. I expected the system would allocate that stock 1 to one of the Orders but it seems to be not working as I expect.
Any explanations will be much appreciated and will not hesitate to avoid the points.
Kind regards,
Ishara

Hi DB49,
Appreciate your reply. Please see the following comments.
Right now I have been assuming that you have performed an availability check manually for one of the planned orders, and you got the same results (overconfirmation). Please confirm.
Yeah I have performed for one order and it gave me the same result. Also, when I perform for the 2nd Order, it allocates the quantity.
OK, basic things you should already have checked:
You have maintained the checking rule for planned orders (OPPQ or OPPR)
You have maintained the ATP group for the materials (OVZ2)
You have assigned the ATP group to the Material Master of the components (MM02)
You have maintained the scope of check according to the rules you mentioned earlier (OPPJ).
You have no planning strategy in the component material that would have invoked a special ATP.
I checked everything apart from point 2 (OVZ2). I have maintained that via MRP Group and that MRP Group has been linked to Master Data (MRP 3)
Really appreciate your support in this.
Kind regards,
Ishara

Is ATP check possible in Service Order for Sales Item?

Hi All,
My question, is ATP check possible in Service Order for Sales Item? My requirement is that when i create a service order in the web UI with a sales item and drill down to the item level, i see the schedule lines assignment block but w/o any Confirming date, so i want to know whether the ATP check is happening or not. For example wen i create a sales order in web UI with a sales item and drill down into the item level, the schedule line AB shows me the Confirming date checking the ATP. But this is not happening in case of service order. So kindly suggest the reason and clarify my query. Thanks
Regards
Sridevi

Nobody can help me???
Please.
Thanks

ATP check with including puchase order

when we create SO with ATP check to reserve the qty of the currenct stock, we also want to know the future qty of purchase orders so that we can clearly know the supply and demand of these materials.
so we use ATP check with including purchase order, that users can reserve the qty of open GR purchase orders.
but when the status of that PO changed, the reserved qty before won't have effect, and can't create outbound delivery either.
there are two examples below:
1. there is one SO reserved 10 material qty of the open GR PO, which it's scheduled delivery date is 5/15. but this PO still hasn't goods receipt until 5/17, cause ATP check rule is "Include future receipts only" ( if "Receipts in the past as well as in the future" is set, it will be confused with current stock qty), so these 10 qty won't have effect and the ATP qty is now a negative. we should only reserve again by t-code V_V2, otherwise all the reserved qty can't be deliveried.
2.there is one SO reserved 10 material qty of the open GR PO, which it's scheduled delivery date is 5/15, but when the delivery date of confirms tab is updated by vendor, these reserved qty before will also be invalid.
please tell me how to resolve these problems?

Hi,
If the business wants to confirm the sales order quantity against the incoming purchase orders, then this always happen. The issue can be resolved only by rescheduling the sales order by running V_V2 everyday.
Alternatively you can suggest the business to exclude the purchase order from availabilty check(AC) in t.code OVZ9 and include shipping notification in it. When the vendor sends some materials confirmation, the purchasing can add the shipping notificatoin details in the purchase order and can create Inbound deliveries for goods receipt. By this way, only when the vendor ships the goods, the quantity will be taken into AC.
Regards,

ATP: check rule AE in place of A when creating sales document

Hello,
when creating a sales order in the sand box, the ATP check rule was "A".
when creating a sales oorder in the development box, the ATP check rule is AE.
The product, the order type, the ATP configuration are completely similar.
I red on the forum that the check rule is determined by the system without any customizing reason.
But in this case, there must be a reason explaining why the system wants us to make assembly order as we do not use PP.
So do you have any idea how this check rule is determined?
Thank you,
Yann

Man I've been trying to figure this out all day. Luckily for you there is a person here who knows more than I do and he was gracious enough to answer my questions. The long & short of it is there is no assignment you can configure or change, the Check Rule is an internal assignment (hard coded) based on the MRP and requirements settings of the material. If you are getting AE then you are using a make-to-order material. Try a different material... one that is not replenishment, consignment or make to order. If you're getting a different rule in 2 different systems with the same materials please share the MM settings of each and we can explore the differences.
This is about as deep as you can get into ATP. Good stuff!

Settlement Rule for Internal Order

Hi All
I have Maintained Settlement rule for Internal order as under
CAT - FXA
Settlement Receiver - Asset
% - 100
Settlement type - Full
Now after settlement of above Order in KO88 . I want again use above internal order. Hence i have trying to put Settlement rule 50% for some anther asset but system gave me following error. Please guide on this issue.
Total = 50.00%, ( Set.Type PER / Version / Actual settlement ), period 010/2011
Message no. KD042
Diagnosis
You have entered distribution rules which settle 50.00% in total. This applies for settlement view ( Set.Type PER / Version / Actual settlement ) in period 010/2011.
When checking the percentage total, the system found one of the following errors:
The total percentage for the distribution rules is more than 100%
The total percentage for the distribution rules is less than 100% and this is a rule for full settlement.
The total percentage for the distribution rules is less than 100% and the 100% check is switched on in the settlement profile.

Hi:
        Please refer to the contents of OSS Note 45612 - IM: pre-settlement does not work, or KD042... which states
"Symptom
    1. If a preliminary settlement rule (for example, to cost center) is entered for individual items of capital investment measures with line item management, this rule is not considered during periodic settlement. There is no settlement to cost centers.
    2. If you enter a final settlement rule for individual line items of investment measures with line item management for a partial capitalization (that is, the percentage rate is less than 100%), then you receive the unjustified error message KD042 "Total percent = xx%".
Additional key words
KOB5, CJ70, CJ88, CJ8G, KO88, KO8G, preliminary settlement, partial settlement, partial capitalization
Cause and prerequisites
    1. You did not enter the settlement type ACT in the preliminary settlement rule.
    You can check this in the Line Item Apportionment transaction by choosing the menu option "Goto" -> "Overview dist. rules" to display the distribution rule groups entered so far.
    The system displays rules which have no entry in the "SetTyp" field (settlement type, field name PERBZ).
    2. The check of the percentages is incorrect.
Solution
    1. Install the following correction. Afterwards reverse the incorrect settlement, re-enter the preliminary settlement rule and settle again.
    2. Install the following correction. Afterwards, you can maintain the settlement rule for the partial settlement.
    Note: If you want to use a default settlement rule (maintaining the settlement rule from the master data maintenance transaction), then you are required to distribute the line items at 100%. In order to carry out a partial capitalization (settlement of less than 100%), you have to use menu path "Actual postings -> Period-end closing -> Settlement -> Line item "
Regards

Determination of checking Rule in sales order

Dear all,
how the checking rule is determined in sales order av.check, In the t code OPJJ we are maintained so many checking rule for one checking group, In the sales order how the system determines the checking rule,
I am expecting positive feedback from your end .
Best Regards,
Kumar

Hi Kumar,
You will have to maintain the checking group default for Material Type & Plant in Customization.
You can assign the plant & the checking rule for processing Back order Processing.
You can set default values for the relevant sales area & the availability checking rule.
You will have to assign the requirement class to reqirement type.
Maintain the avbl. check & TOR for the relevant schedule line.
These settings need to be done for the avbl. check to be performed at the sales order level.
Hope this will help you.
Thanks & Regards
Krishna Mohan

Error-M2O-Settlement rule for assembly order for item...could not be genera

Hi,
When I am creating Sales Order (VA01) for M2O, I am able to do the costing and copy the EK02 condition type. I have verified the the incompletion log, it indicates that document is complete.
But while saving the sales order, the below error message is displaed:
Settlement rule for assembly order for item 000010 could not be generated. Should the order still be saved?
                Yes/No
1. If No is choosen the following error message is displayed
       Error when processing Production order
      Error when processing Production order
      Message no. V1380
      Diagnosis
        A technical error has occurred. On calling up the assembly interface, exception 5 was triggered. The exceptions have the following meanings:
1 = External block, 2 = General error, 3 = Insufficient data for the interface, 4 = Order was not found, 5 = Update has been rejected, 6 = Final document number for Production order is not issued. Procedure: Inform your system administrator.
2. If Yes is choosen, it is creating Production Order without settlement rule. Able to perform GI & Gr. If I try to enter settelement rule (Settlement receiver SDI - Sales document item) in production order (CO02), the belwo error message is displayed
"Distribution rule for Sales document item can only be created automatically Message no. KD063"
We are using the requierement class with below details:
Reqmts class: ZSO- for M2O
AAC = E, Valuation = A, Settlement profile =SD1, RAKey = 000004, Assembly type = 3.
Settlement profile contain:
Allocation structure, PA structure, Default object type = SDI. Valid receivers: Optional -Sales Order / Prof. seg.
If I make the Valuation field as blank in Reqmts class, there is no error while creating Sales order. And also Settelemnt rule with sales document item as receiver is successfully creating for the production order. Since the Valuation is blank in requirement class, it is Non valuated Sales order stock. All GIs & GR are non valuated
The business requirement is it should be valuated sales order stock and the production varinaces has to be settled to Sales order. Then Sales order has to be settled to COPA.
Need your valuable inputs to meet this requirement.
Let me know if you need any further details.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
ADI

Dear SAP PP Consultant ,
What is the strategy group you are maintained in the material master ?

Something interesting with check rule for VAT registration no.

Hi Guys,
I found something weird in sap with check rule for VAT registration no.
If I set any of check rules for US and save(tcode oy17), then change the country of a customer from DE to US and save(not change the VAT registration no), the system post error messages "ISO code DE is not correct in the VAT registration number". But if I set rule for AU(australia) with same rule as US, and change the customer's country from DE to AU(not change the VAT no), no error happens and customer can be saved successfully. So anybody can give any explanation on this problem?
Thanks in advance, point will be rewared. Waiting for the comments.
Regards,
Alex

<TABLE align=center border=0 cellPadding=1 cellSpacing=1 width="95%"><tr><td width="15px"><input type="image" src="wwv_flow_file_mgr.get_file?p_security_group_id=1046425373323359&p_fname=add2d1.jpg" name="add_QTB_5174" id="add_QTB_5174" onclick="javascript:addRowToTable('QTB_5174',4,22.5);return false;"/></td><td width="15px"><input type="image" src="wwv_flow_file_mgr.get_file?p_security_group_id=1046425373323359&p_fname=delete2d.gif" alt="delete" name="delete_QTB_5174" id="delete_QTB_5174" onclick="javascript:removeRowFromTable('QTB_5174');return false;"/></td><td><input type="image" src="wwv_flow_file_mgr.get_file?p_security_group_id=1046425373323359&p_fname=edit2d.jpg" alt="edit" name="edit_QTB_5174" id="edit_QTB_5174" onclick="javascript:updateTableRow('QTB_5174',22.5);return false;"/></td></tr></table>
<input type="hidden" value="QTB_5174" id="5174"><TABLE align=center border=0 cellPadding=1 cellSpacing=1 width="95%" id="QTB_5174" name="QTB_5174">
this a sample code. I have marked the name attrib in bold.

Posting rule for assembly order for item 000000 could not be generated

Hi all,
While creating production order from sales order system giving an error message 'Posting rule for assembly order for item 000000 could not be generated.'
Kindly help to resolve the issue.
SmanS

Dear SAP PP Consultant ,
What is the strategy group you are maintained in the material master ?

Settlement Rules for PP Orders - Need a user exit?

Hello,
We have a PP Order Type (ZSVL) that requires a sales order to create. SAP then defaults in a settlement rule with 100% to the MAT. We want to default in or alter via user exit a settlement rule with 100% to a specific fixed cost center. We cannot get SAP to default it in. We have not found a user exit that will let us alter this settlement rule, either at PP Order save or during settlement. If we can't do this then the user is forced to manually change the rule for every order entered and we want to avoid this, if possible.
Any suggestions?
Ideas tried already:
PP Order exits and BADIs do not include Settlement Rules in their interfaces.
IWO0027 settlement exit is for internal orders and does not work on PP orders
K_SETTLEMENT_1 has limited fields to change.
[Picasa Photos of Settlement Rule|http://picasaweb.google.com/johnnorman/SAPSettlementRule?feat=email#]
[Alternate Link to Picasa Photos|http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/sredir?uname=johnnorman&target=ALBUM&id=5371036612659624289&authkey=Gv1sRgCNio0I2O376a_gE&feat=email]
This is SAP 4.7 patch level 19... behind but upgrade to 6.0 is next year...
Thank you for your help and any ideas in advance!

Hi,
PP Orders should always be settled to the Material and thats the standard SAP design. From the settlement rule it is clear that you have created a Cost Center called Production Variance and the settlement is pointed to that Cost Center.
A better design / approach would be to settle the PP Orders to MAT. And Month-End Variance calculation will categorize the variances and push to CO-PA. Variances reports could help in gathering the information regarding the variance categories and the amount of variances. (If that is the only purpose why you are settling to CTR). Currently, since you are settling the variances to the CTR, how the Cost Center is getting cleared / zeroed?
The existing approach can be re-visited and business requirements can be analyzed to see how that can be met through what SAP delivers.
Thanks,

Create new settlement rule for an order with a function module

Hi,
I would like to create a settlement rule for an order. I searched for existing function modules and found K_ORDER_SETTLEMENT_RULE, which seems to be the correct one.
The problem: The settlement rules, which I create with this function module are not saved.
Do I have to call another function module to save my new rules?
Thanks in advance,
Fabian

Hi,
Settlement rules are first of all defined in customizing how the should be behave and secondly lies the question how to update a CO cost object with this settlement rule.
My first advice would be to use the "automatic settlement derivation feature" that can be setup in customizing alike. <b>SPRO -> Controlling -> Internal Orders -> Actual Postings -> Settlement -> Automatic generation of Settlement Rule</b>. Read the docu for this node (right click and choose Display documentation) to understand what possibilities and limitations this functionality has. Below this node you have the possibility to define a "settlement strategy" and allocate this to a order type. You can also define a Enhamcement (COOM0003
) where you can somewhat influence the automatic generation of settlement rules.
Execute transaction KO8G (collective processing) or KO88 (indicidual processing) to create a settlement rule for internal orders.
The other option you have is to create a custom program based on BDC to create settlement rule for internal orders.
I think the BDC program would be a better idea for you.
Let me know if you have any question.
Regards,
RS

ATP checking rule for PM order

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for