ATP Checking Rule - stock transport sch. agmnt

Hi friends,
i created a New checking rule (ZB) in /NOMGP - stock transfer sch. agmnt. for inter company stock transfer. i attached it with a checking group(Z0) and made scope of check. And assigned with doc type LU, supplying plant, delivery type NLCC & checking rule (ZB). the Z0 checking group is assigned in mat master in sales org/plant view.
After creating delivery (VL10*) , in dlv i am getting Checking rule as "B". so i am not getting the ATP checks as per Z0-ZB setting. (checking group is coming correctly from mat master).
Can I get the checking rule ZB ??? in Delivery (environment -->availability )
thanks in advance
maity

Hi,
just maintain the same cheking group in mrp3 view of materailmaster also
and then try
hope it helps
reward if useful
rohit

Similar Messages

ATP - Checking Rule

Hi friends,
i created a New checking rule (ZB) in /NOMGP - stock transfer sch. agmnt. for inter company stock transfer. i attached it with a checking group(Z0) and made scope of check. And assigned with doc type LU, supplying plant, delivery type NLCC & checking rule (ZB). the Z0 checking group is assigned in mat master in sales org/plant view.
After creating delivery (VL10*) , in dlv i am getting Checking rule as "B". so i am not getting the ATP checks as per Z0-ZB setting. (checking group is coming correctly from mat master).
Can I get the checking rule ZB ??? in Delivery (environment -->availability )

Hi,
just maintain the same cheking group in mrp3 view of materailmaster also
and then try
hope it helps
reward if useful
rohit

ATP: check rule AE in place of A when creating sales document

Hello,
when creating a sales order in the sand box, the ATP check rule was "A".
when creating a sales oorder in the development box, the ATP check rule is AE.
The product, the order type, the ATP configuration are completely similar.
I red on the forum that the check rule is determined by the system without any customizing reason.
But in this case, there must be a reason explaining why the system wants us to make assembly order as we do not use PP.
So do you have any idea how this check rule is determined?
Thank you,
Yann

Man I've been trying to figure this out all day. Luckily for you there is a person here who knows more than I do and he was gracious enough to answer my questions. The long & short of it is there is no assignment you can configure or change, the Check Rule is an internal assignment (hard coded) based on the MRP and requirements settings of the material. If you are getting AE then you are using a make-to-order material. Try a different material... one that is not replenishment, consignment or make to order. If you're getting a different rule in 2 different systems with the same materials please share the MM settings of each and we can explore the differences.
This is about as deep as you can get into ATP. Good stuff!

ATP check for 'stock in transfer'

I have a scenario which I created a Sales Order for 100 EA of product 'X' shipping from DC01 to a customer. DC01 does not currently have inventory for product 'X'. SAP has inventory only available in DC02.
I created a (two step) STO and an outbound delivery shipping inventory from DC02 to DC01. I issued the 100 EA of product 'X' against the outbound delivery. Transaction MB5T shows the 100 EA 'in transit'.
Under my availability check, on my sales order, the checking rule scope displays, a check on 'Include Stock in transfer'.
Why am I unable to view my stock in transit of '100' EA from the STO process when I look at the ATP check ? How can ATP view the 'Stock in transfer' from the two step STO?
Thank you,
Gustavo

Hi,
Check the settings in t.code OVZ9.
Check the box include purchase orders and select A or X in the field Incl. rel. order reqs field.
After making these settings, just test and update the results.
Do you have batches in the STO? If so are they in restricted status during "in-transit"?
Regards

ATP checking rule for PM order

Hi friends,
How do I check which ATP rule is being used for Plant maintainence order (PM) order. Using Tcode IW41 we create PM order and do the goods movement type 261.
Error: I have an item ABC with quantity 1 and there exists a deliver for this 1 unit. Still, I am able to issue this part to PM order which should not happen.
Please advise .
Sruthi

SPRO->PM and CS->Maintenance and service processing->Maintenance and service orders->Functions and settings for order type->Availabilty check for material, PRTs and capacity

Sales order ATP check - stock transport order

Hi,
When the sales orders is created it performs availability check on stock transport order as per the settings and confirms quantity. However, when the stock transport order carries a batch which has a restricted status, the sales order still confirms the quantity based on the stock transport order delivery date. I have applied OSS notes 350864 and 154682, but still the system confirms quantity, which has restricted status at batch level in stock transport order.
Can any one help with a solution for this scenario?
Thanks,
Shiva

Hi
Try the following exits.
EXIT_SAPLATPC_001
EXIT_SAPLATPC_002.
Reward points if this helps.
Regards
Karan

Block the ATP Stock for non-ATP checked items in BOP

Hello GATP Experts,
We have a strange and interesting scenario here with STOs. Let me explain step by step
1) We don't do ATP check for STOs and hence a Z-check mode has been designed and it will be considered for STO documents
2) Now, let us consider a situation where I have a stock of 100 CS for Material M1 at Plant P1.
3) Let's say, a STO document gets created at 09:00AM in the morning with requested quantity 50 and as it doesn't do ATP check this will be fully confirmed
and consumes 50CS of the stock.
4) So, the net cumulative quantity that is available is 50CS.
5) At 11:00AM,let us say; there is a sales order that was created for a quantity of 100 CS. As the sales document does the ATP check it consumes the only available 50 CS and gets saved with partial confirmaiton situation.
Now, at 12:00 PM - We are running the BOP. When we run the BOP ; what standard SAP does is STO document (as per our business scenario, STOs has higheest priority and they fall on top of the list) gets skipped due to non-ATP check mode and full stock is allocated to the sales order which makes no sense to us which leads to over confirmation situation.
We thought of exluding the STOs from BOP ; however - we end up in not re-scheduling the STO documents which would result in requiring a separate BOP to be run for the STO documents.
FYI - We have contacted SAP and they have confirmed that the above mentioned behavior of the BOP is as designed and it cannot be changed.
Is there any alternative solution for this ? Appreciate your valuable ideas.
Thanks
Babu Kilari

You might have already considered this. pardon if this sounds dumb.
see if you can pass STO's as a receipt in the scope of check for STO's. I presume it is requirement element in your case for ATP checking rule for STO's. Don't include these STO's in sales order checking rules.
This may result in inconsistent ATP logic though. Alternately try creating a Z category for STO and call it a receipt. include this also in the scope of check for STO's.
Try running BOP and see what happens. BOP on its own is not a gurantee that a requirement is always confirmed over another, whatever be the sorting criteria. If there isnt enough stuff, the system has its own internal logic of sorting too which probably treats priority by time of creation of the requirement.
Publish if you meet any success. These ideas are just based on my fancies
Guru

Checking Rule/Special Stock

Hi All,
Our requirement is to have our rush orders, order type ZRU, ignore incoming PO's so that the line will J0 error when there is no available stock in the warehouse. The scope of check allows you to uncheck "Incl. purchase orders" to accomplish this, however you cannot assign a different scope of check per sales order type.
I have tried this workaround: created item category ZRSH (copy of TAN) and maintained special stock of E in customization. I have set ZRSH to be the default item category for order type ZRU. This special stock category will have ZRSH items determine a scope of check for Z2/AE, as opposed to the regular Z2/A. The purchase order indicator was unchecked for Z2/AE.
The problem is that with the special stock E, ZRSH items are not checking regular stock batches during ATP. I have seen table T148, but do not want to start modifying this standard table. Is there a way to have this special stock E look at regular stock? Or is there another way to have a different scope of check for ZRU rush orders?
Thanks for any help,
J

Bibiane,
I apologize for using an undefined abbreviation. Yes, I was referring to the Apparel and Footwear solution.
The functionality (MTO/PTO) you mentioned is common to AFS, I have never seen it used in Basic ERP. I guess you are saying that you do not have the AFS addin installed into your ERP 6 system.
In general, 'A' refers to MTS and 'AE' refers to MTO. The determination of the ATP check is contained within SD order management programs, and is influenced by both master data and SD configuration. I couldn't state with any certainty that I know all the ways that ATP checking rule could possibly be determined.
You are evidently using a custom ATP check (Y5), for which I would be unable to predict the functionality. You are evidently using characteristics/classification about which I have no knowledge to determine SO behavior. You normally would pose these questions to your SD team lead, asking him how he has configured the ATP check to work.
In conclusion, the topics about which you enquire are not really BPX topics, and not topics about which I would consider myself an expert. For best responses, I suggest you close this thread, and reopen in one of the SD forums, such as
SAP ERP Sales and Distribution (SAP SD)
Sorry I can't be of more help,
DB49

Problem in creation of STO(stock transport order)

hi all SAP gurus,
i am facing the problem in creation of stock transport order with ME21N code. i m getting the error msg of "Not possible to determine shipping data for material in STO "
i have checked the stock transport order setup in customization. but not getting the clear idea to come out from this problem.
if anybody have the idea of " how to do the customization of stock transport order setup, pls. let me explain.
thnx in advance.
rgrds,
rajesh

Hi Rajesh,
when ur creating STO with UB doc type, then you have to maintain material in both the plants.
Regarding the error which is comming for you, you have to check the settings at
SPRO- IMG- MM-Purchasing-Set up stock transport order- Assign delivery type & Checking rule
here for document type UB and your supplying plant-XXXX select nothing for Dlv type(delivery type) and chr - 01 and after this save.
After this you create STO as you are doing and see what the system is prompting.
For any further clarification let me know.
Regards,
NJ

ATP check with including puchase order

when we create SO with ATP check to reserve the qty of the currenct stock, we also want to know the future qty of purchase orders so that we can clearly know the supply and demand of these materials.
so we use ATP check with including purchase order, that users can reserve the qty of open GR purchase orders.
but when the status of that PO changed, the reserved qty before won't have effect, and can't create outbound delivery either.
there are two examples below:
1. there is one SO reserved 10 material qty of the open GR PO, which it's scheduled delivery date is 5/15. but this PO still hasn't goods receipt until 5/17, cause ATP check rule is "Include future receipts only" ( if "Receipts in the past as well as in the future" is set, it will be confused with current stock qty), so these 10 qty won't have effect and the ATP qty is now a negative. we should only reserve again by t-code V_V2, otherwise all the reserved qty can't be deliveried.
2.there is one SO reserved 10 material qty of the open GR PO, which it's scheduled delivery date is 5/15, but when the delivery date of confirms tab is updated by vendor, these reserved qty before will also be invalid.
please tell me how to resolve these problems?

Hi,
If the business wants to confirm the sales order quantity against the incoming purchase orders, then this always happen. The issue can be resolved only by rescheduling the sales order by running V_V2 everyday.
Alternatively you can suggest the business to exclude the purchase order from availabilty check(AC) in t.code OVZ9 and include shipping notification in it. When the vendor sends some materials confirmation, the purchasing can add the shipping notificatoin details in the purchase order and can create Inbound deliveries for goods receipt. By this way, only when the vendor ships the goods, the quantity will be taken into AC.
Regards,

Stock transfter Sch. Agreement not taken for Planning

Dear Experts
My scenario is like this,
I have two plants A and B. I will be creating Stock transfer Purchase order at B and the material will be sent from A to B thro' STO process.
When i create Stock Transfer Purchase order thro' ME21N at B,
I am able to see the requirement in MD04 at plant A.
But when I create a Stock Transport Scheduling agreement by ME37.
I am not able to see that in my Stock requirements list and it is not taken for MRP run also.
My requirement is when i create a stock transport sch. agreement, the system should show it in MD04 at Plant A and it should be included in the MRP.
Please tell me what settings need to be done.
Thanks & Regards
Bala
Whereas when i create Stock Transfer Purchase Order,

Dear,
Check your delivery schedule line dates, if you have maintained in future then it will not allow to create the delivery.
Also check your scheduling agreement is released document.
Did you maintain the MRP data in the material master for this mateiral and special procurement key needs to be maintained for this mateiral in MRP 2 view (from plant)?
Normal process from One Plant to Aonther Plant
1 Go to ME31 enter the supplying Plant and other details
.2 In the next scree enter material ,qty and save
STO no is created
3. Use MB1B enter the movement type : 351 and enter all the details and save. Send the material to the other plant with documents
4. Receive the material in the othe plant in Mov 101
5. use MB5T to see the material -STOCK in transit
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

ATP Temporarily Assigned Stock Problem

Hi All,
We're having a problem with ATP checks ignoring stock assigned to status T - Temporarily assigned stock/requirements, and double-promising against any quantity that hasn't been yet allocated to R - Reserved or F - Fixed.
For example, batch 0001 has 400 pieces allocated in F status, and 100 pieces unallocated and in A - Available status. If we enter Order 1 for 100 and save, this stock correctly moves from A to T. If another Order 2 is entered however, we are able to put up to 100 on the order and it will allow us to save. If we put 101, 100 will promise, and 1 will reject... when all 101 should reject, since 100 are already promised to Order 1 and we have no stock in A.
I cannot find anywhere in configuration where this T status is now being ignored by ATP checks. Thanks if anyone can help!
-J

Also I forgot to note that we are running AFS.
Yes. There is an option in the availability check control configuration for "Include sales reqmts". If this is checked, ATP is supposed to take into account requirements generated by existing sales documents. We have it checked, but it is still ignoring these sales requirements.

ATP check with acknowledged PO 's only

Dear Experts
In ATP checking rule A or B my client does not want to consider all Purchase orders but only those which have been acknowledged by Vendor.
Is there a possibility of this. I do not see any standard setting in configuration to achieve it.
Regards,
Neeraj Srivastava

Hi,
There is no standard SAP functionality can help your scenario.
You can try to use exit EXIT_SAPLATPC_001. You can check with an ABAP'er for possibilities.
Also try to look for OSS notes.
Regards

Rules Based ATP with Stock Transport Order

Hi All,
Can we use Rules Based ATP with Stock Transport Order..
Where to assign the business transaction to the STO order type ?
Regards,
Biswajit

Hi,
Please follow the link
Re: Rules based product substitution in STO
Thanks,
Pavan Verma

Rule based ATP check with SOA

Hello,
We wish to implement ATP check using Ent Services.
Details:
Environment : SAP ECC 6.o with Enhancement Package 3/ SCM 5.0
Ent service used: /SAPAPO/SDM_PARCRTRC : ProductAvailabilityRequirementCreateRequestConfirmation
We were able to carry out Product check using the service. However we are unable to carry out rule based ATP check using the same service.
We have carried out the entire configuration as per SAP's building block configuration guide for Global ATP & SAP Note 1127895.
For RBA <Rule based ATP check>, we are getting the results as expected when we create Sales order from SAP R/3 (Transaction VA01), however ATP simulation in APO & Ent service does not give the results as expected. When we carry out ATP simulation in APO / Ent service, results are same as Product check & not as RBA i.e. they respect only requested Product location stock & does not propose alternate Product or Location in case of shortages
Plz share the experience to fix the issue
Mangesh A. Kulkarni

Hi mangesh
Check this links , not very sure , but may help you...
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/wiki?path=/display/erplo/availability%252bchecking%252bin%252bsap
Re: ATP confirmation in CRM
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/wiki?path=/display/scm/rba
Regards
Abhishek

ATP Checking Rule - stock transport sch. agmnt

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for