ATP : Scope of Check : Requirements & Reservations ?

Hello All,
In OVZ9 --> for the Scope-of-Check combination 02-B , could anyone explain what is the impact of selecting the following fields with some examples :-
1) "Include Reservations". (field RESBP).
2) "Include Sales Requirements". (field VBBDP).
There is not much information on help.sap.com/
Thanks,
Srinivas

HI,
Include Reservation  means system will consider Reserve Stock (Stock is blocked for any spl. orde/any order or you can say Make to Order stock) during availibility check if this check is activated at Checking rule level then system will consider these stock also for Aval. Check otherwise not.
Include Sales Requirements Means System will consider the open sales order (Means the sales order not deliverd ) also consider for availibility check,Exp. you have 1000 Qty. stock available for you & 3 open sales order of 100 Qty. each ,now if you go for any new sales order system will show stock available 700 Qty. even if these order are not deliverd.
Mean to say system will block the qty. for these order respectively based on the configuration done at checking rule level.
I hope this will clear ur point...
Revert me if still not clear.....
Regards
Deepak

Similar Messages

  • ATP : Scope of check planned order

    Dear guru
    In the ATP scope of check with inclusion planned orders I have also option B : only check planned order that are completely confirmed.
    What does it mean completely confirmed ?
    Thanks in advance.

    Setting in scope of check is set to only consider completely confirmed planned orders
    After some further testing with a 3 level BOM...
    C > B > A, Each level has a planned order
    When all 3 levels are shortage free, the availability check confirms each planned order as being 100% complete.
    Creating a partial shortgage on planned order C will confirm planned orders B and A as 0% complete and planned order C as partially complete.
    Creating a partial shortage on planned order B will confirm C as complete, B as partially complete and A as 0% complete.

  • I want to know about ATP check requirement .generally we assigned yes or no while creating sales order

    I want to know about ATP check requirement .generally we assigned yes or no while creating sales order what it means when we give Yes or No. how pegging flows
    Regards
    virender

    Virender,
    Can you be a bit more specific about ".....generally we assigned yes or no while creating sales order....."   Exactly what field(s) did you 'assign'?  Screenshots would be helpful.
    With respect to pegging; in general, ATP has very little to do with pegging.  Pegging is more of a planning concept, and not an 'availability checking' concept.  There are a few exceptions in APO, but they are not commonly implemented.
    Can you elaborate about exactly what you want to know with respect to 'pegging' and ATP?
    Best Regards,
    DB49

  • How can we change the scope of check?

    Hello,
    we need different scope of checks for different sales order types;
    e.g.
    Sales order Europe
    Sales order Asia
    Express sales order Europe
    etc.
    Is it only possible to change the business event by a development (user exit in ERP)?
    Thanks a lot for help.

    Idieh,
    It is generally considered unwise to use more than one scope of check for a given product/location/business event.  It leads to unexpected conflicts and inconsistencies when canceling and/or re-ATP'ing a sales doc and when running BOP.
    I can't think of any legitimate business requirement that cannot be satisfied by using a single scope of check for a given business event.  For extraordinary business requirements, the normal solution is Rules Based ATP.  It is unclear what your actual business requirements are, so I can't say what is the best Standard (unenhanced) solution would be.
    Best Regards,
    DB49.

  • Scope of check tab vanished from delivery proposal screen

    Hi,
    Not sure how this happened but I seemed to have lost check control tab from delivery proposal screen(ATP sales order). It was seen until yday. Not a nice event to start weekend with. Would appreciate your inputs on what could have gone wrong. I can see all other "normal" tabs - check instructions, proposal buttons and other icons. I dont recall landing on any "setting" for this or fiddling with anything relataed lest there is some remote control
    Guru

    Thanks Babu
    I am referring to the delivery proposal screen that you get after clicking ATP check icon. Below the context menu there are analysis tab strips. e.g. check instructions, scheduling etc. There was the scope of check tab the day before but I dont see it know. In another box e.g. dev box I am able to see it. you would definately know this tab. It shows what requirements and receipts and stocks were used by the checking rule (ATP group and business event combination) to evaluate ATP qty. I dont know what made it vanish. I dont recall fiddling anything in customizing to make happen such and I dont think there is configurable setting for the same.
    Guru

  • Scope of check( avail.check) remains static altough configuration changed

    Here is the issue,
    After running the availability check on the sales order I saved it.But due to some requirements I needed to make some changes in the availability like remove sales requirements check(configuration).
    Now I comeback to the saved order and I observe the scope of check remains the same altough I have changed it as I mentioned earlier.
    How can this issue be resolved???????????

    You need to delete the line item, then save the sales order. Then try to re-enter the line item in the sales order and check.
    Regards,

  • Availability check with reservation transfer

    Dear all
    I have a problem with availability check.
    Reservation transfer, generated from processing MRP (from MRP area Z002 to MRP Area Z001).
    Availability check doesn't  consider reservation transfers generated from processing MRP.
    if fixed the requirement, simply by saving for example, the availability check works. Of course, if I create it manually (MB21) works.
    This behavior is normal?
    many thanks!

    Dear all
    I have a problem with availability check.
    Reservation transfer, generated from processing MRP (from MRP area Z002 to MRP Area Z001).
    Availability check doesn't  consider reservation transfers generated from processing MRP.
    if fixed the requirement, simply by saving for example, the availability check works. Of course, if I create it manually (MB21) works.
    This behavior is normal?
    many thanks!

  • Scope of check in APO

    Hi,
    Can anyone explain me the catogories in scope of check in APO. What happens if I add the catagory in scope of check. I would like to know the meaning of the below catagories .
    ProdRes
    PrdRes (W)
    PrdRes (N)
    MatRes(WN)
    OrdRes
    OrdRes (W)
    The below sdn links explains each and every parameter used in ECC6(OPJJ).
    http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPLO/Availabilitycheckingin+SAP
    I am looking for similar one for APO
    Thanks in advance
    Purushotham

    Hi Purushotham,
    Just goto the customizing for ATP groups:
    SPRO
    SAP - Implementation Guide
    Advanced Planning and Optimization
    Global Available-to-Promise (Global ATP)
    General Settings
    Maintain Category
    Here you find a short description of each ATP group. You can add one of these elements to the scope of check and next time you run a ATP check, this element will be considered for calculating the cumulated ATP quantity.
    hope this helps.
    br,
    Michael

  • How do I sign my VB / VS 2010 based shared COM add-in for Excel so it loads when the user has checked "Require application add-ins to be signed by a trusted publisher"?

    My COM add-in is developed using VS 2010 and VB. It's a shared COM add-in (not VSTO) and it works with Excel 2007 - 2013. My installer is signed with a code signing certificate but it would appear that my add-in's .dll should also be signed if the user has
    checked the "Require application add-ins to be signed by a trusted publisher" option.
    The "Sign the assembly" option is checked in my add-in's VB -> My Project -> Signing. I have a .snk file selected which I seem to recall generating 6 or 7 years ago when I ported the COM add-in from VB6 to .NET. 
    I have an up-to-date Comodo code signing certificate (a pfx file called MyCompanyCodeSigningCertificatePrivateKey.pfx) which I purchased to use with the installer and was wondering if and how I could use this.
    I tried selecting my pfx file in the My Project -> Signing -> "Choose a strong name key file" dialog. It made a copy of the pfx file in my project folder but when I tried to build the project, I got the following error:
    Error 1 Cannot import the following key file: MyCompanyCodeSigningCertificatePrivateKey.pfx. The key file may be password protected. To correct this, try to import the certificate again or manually install the certificate to the Strong Name CSP with the
    following key container name: VS_KEY_C0B6F251F0FB6016
    After a little research, I found out I might be able to use signtool to sign the dll in a post-build step.
    I added the following command to the post-build event, before the command I use to regasm the assembly.
    "path to signtool\signtool" sign /f "MyCompanyCodeSigningCertificatePrivateKey.pfx" /p "xxxx" /v "$(TargetPath)"
    When I built the project, the dll appeared to get signed (the output window showed a bunch of confirming text as well as "Successfully signed: c:\MyAddIn\bin\Release\MyAddIn.dll") but the next step in the post-build (regasm myaddin.dll /codebase)
    issued a warning RA0000 (see below) but reported "Types registered successfully".
    Here's the message I get from regasm, even though the output window says the dll was sucessfully signed:
    RegAsm : warning RA0000: Registering an unsigned assembly with /codebase can cause your assembly to interfere with other applications that may be installed on the same computer. The /codebase switch is intended to be used only with signed assemblies. Please give your assembly a strong name and re-register it.
    Types registered successfully
    I'm not using a shim if that makes a difference.
    How do I sign my add-in so it loads when the user has checked "Require application add-ins to be signed by a trusted publisher"?
    Any tips would be appreciated.

    Hello,
    Why do you need to use the regasm utility from the post-build action?
    There is a difference between signing the assembly with a strong name and digital signature. The
    How to: Sign an Assembly with a Strong Name article in MSDN explains how to sign an assembly with a strong name (.snk). See
    How to digitally sign a strong named assembly for adding a digital signature.
    You may also find the
    What's the Difference, Part Five: certificate signing vs strong naming article helpful.

  • Error: SNAP_ADT does not exist in the database - manual check required

    Hello Friends,
    We are  performing an upgrade+migration to HDB using the DMO option(Oracle to HANA).
    We are getting below error in the phase MAIN_SHDCRE/SUBMOD_SHDDBCLONE/DBCLONE!
    Also find the output of SE11 & SE14 attached.
    SE14->
    Please help us with the manual check.
    Regards
    Sury

    Hi Sury,
    In regards to the error below:
    1EETGCLN Error: SNAP_ADT does not exist in the database -> manual check
    required
    1EETGCLN SNAP_ADT
    1EETGCLN Table does not exist
    Could you please try to activate the following tables via SE11?
    -  SNAP_ADT
    Once they are activated, Could you please repeat the phase and update the result?
    Thanks and Regards,
    James Wong
    Follow us:
    SAP System Upgrade & Update Troubleshooting Wiki Space.
    SAP Product Support Twitter  ( Hashtag: #NWUPGRADE)

  • Mass availability check for reservations created manually

    Hi,
    Please let me know if there is any transaction for mass availablity check for reservations created manually.we can check avaialabilty for individual reservations in mb21 or mb22.but we need a collective availabilty check feature.
    Thanks for the help inadvance.
    Regards
    Krishna

    Thansk a lot for your quick response.I could not find the option for availabilty check in MBVR.could you please explainn me how to see this.
    Regards,
    Krishna

  • Scope of Check Variation in Missing Part list Production Order

    Hi,
    I have a problem that While creation or conversion from planned order to production order if i get missing part list i found that Scope of check is as Z6 and ZP (Checking rule).But when when i Release the same production order also am getting missing part list here when i check scope of check as Z6 and PP(Checking rule).
    Why this difference is coming,can any body tell the possible causes.
    Cheers,
    Kumar.S

    >
    KUMAR.S. wrote:
    > Hi,
    >
    > I have a problem that While creation or conversion from planned order to production order if i get missing part list i found that Scope of check is as Z6 and ZP (Checking rule).But when when i Release the same production order also am getting missing part list here when i check scope of check as Z6 and PP(Checking rule).
    >
    > Why this difference is coming,can any body tell the possible causes.
    >
    > Cheers,
    > Kumar.S
    Kumar,
    Its simple for creation and release of Production order different checking rule is used(This must be intentional). You check this in OPJK transaction,  check for your order type / Plant combination for Business function 1(Create) the checking rule assigned would be ZP, whereas for the same order type / Plant combination for Business function 2(Release) the checking rule would be PP.
    If you want the same, you can change it here. But I assume there must have been a purpose for this custom checking rule creation. You can find the scope of check difference between these 2 combinations in transaction OPJJ.
    Regards,
    Prasobh

  • Check Required Elements and Attributes in JAXB

    Hi
    I need check required elements and attributes in JAXB java classes , if there are any value for them place it , otherwise place default value in xml file , because of it I upgrade JAXB2.0 to JAXB 2.1 to support "required" in "XmlElement" , I read in "JavaWS(JAXB)Tutorial.pdf" that JAXB itself check required elements and attributes , if there are any value for them place it , otherwise place default value in xml file , the exact part of document is :
    << A property is said to have a set value if that value was assigned to it during unmarshalling or by invoking its mutation method. The value of a property is
    its set value, if defined; otherwise, it is the property’s schema specified default value, if any; otherwise, it is the default initial value for the property’s base type as it would be assigned for an uninitialized field within a Java class. >>
    I want to know , dose JAXB do this task ? (now I work with JAXB2.1 but it doesnt do this task.Maybe I must set some configuration)
    and if JAXB doesnt do it , how I can check required elements and attributes in JAXB ?
    Please help me.
    Shariat

    its all on Apple's Developer site
    http://developer.apple.com/DOCUMENTATION/AppleApplications/Reference/FinalCutPro _XML/index.html

  • Scope of check

    Hi
    Once after creation SO, under Scope of check issue qty remaining qty is showing zero for one of the material.
    If i goto VA02 after clicking scope fo check values for issues showing Zero.
    Where as in VA03 its showing correct values.
    Any reasons for this?
    Reg
    Shan1242

    Any clues pl....

  • User Exit for Cost Center authority check in reservation & service entry sh

    Hi,
    We want to have cost center authority check in reservation & SES. Whcih exit should we use for this purpose.
    BTW, we tried the same in SES via the user exit  “SRVREL” componet “EXIT_SAPLEBND_003 for Change to Comm. Structure for Release Strategy Determination” in the include “ZXMLUU10” . Since then the Release strategy for SES is not effecting . Even after blocking the entire code by commenting it, the strategy is not effective. We are able to accept the SES using the Flag Button but without any strategy. How to revive the release strategy.
    Thanks & regards,
    KT Varkey

    Hi Ramki,
    Thanks for the advice. The problem is solved except that for Cost Centre authority check for SES. Tried SRVESLL but it doesn't work. Any other exit or any specific advice to make SRVESLL work for KOSTL check.
    Best regards,
    KT Varkey

Maybe you are looking for