Authorization issues after generating PFCG profile using CRMD_UI_ROLE_PREPA

Dear expert
We create a navigation bar profile and a business role. Then, we generated a PFCG profile for this business role to gather all the authorization object required to meet the functionality provided in this business role. For that, we used the program CRMD_UI_ROLE_PREPARE and then, imported file in our PFCG profile.
But after assigning the user to this business role and PFCG profile, we still have authorization issues. For example, the result lists are not displayed.
The kind of error we get is:
+Cannot display view BP_CONT/ContactDetails
An exception has occurred Exception Class  CX_BSP_DLC_CONFIG_GENERAL_ERR - Error creating configuration model 
Method:  CL_BSP_DLC_VIEW_DESCRIPTOR=>LOAD_APPL_MODEL 
Source Text Row:  14
Cannot display view BP_ADDR/StandardAddress
An exception has occurred Exception Class  CX_BSP_DLC_CONFIG_GENERAL_ERR - Error creating configuration model 
Method:  CL_BSP_DLC_VIEW_DESCRIPTOR=>LOAD_APPL_MODEL 
Source Text Row:  14 +
Thanks in advance for your help
Best regards
Stephanie

Hi,
It is not a short dump but an exception raised in the new UI:
Cannot display view BP_CONT/ContactDetails
An exception has occurred Exception Class CX_BSP_DLC_CONFIG_GENERAL_ERR - Error creating configuration model
Method: CL_BSP_DLC_VIEW_DESCRIPTOR=>LOAD_APPL_MODEL
Source Text Row: 14
Stephanie
Edited by: Stephanie Blouin on Oct 23, 2008 7:48 AM

Similar Messages

  • Authorization issue after the Support packs upgrade

    We're having problem on authorization issue after the SP upgrade.
    One issue if "You are not authorized to call up line item display" using FCH1 and FS10N tcodes.
    And the SU53 showing problem on S_TCODE FAGLL03.
    How are we going to solve this issue? We dont want to add this missing auth object on all our finance roles.
    Thank you in advance.

    How can i send you the trace file? What is your email address?
    If I were you, I won't do that. Did you not ever sign some confidentiality agreement? I wonder.
    Anyhoo... (copy right @ David)
    What are the objects been caught in category RC=4, RC=12?
    Relate them with functional aspect of the transaction (error screen)
    Edited : You can paste RC=4, RC=12 objects here without customer specific value if you want to.
    Regards,
    Arpan Paik
    Edited by: P Arpan on Aug 23, 2011 2:36 PM

  • Authorization issue after technical upgrade

    We just completed an uprade to BI 7.0 SP 15.  We only want to complete a technical upgrade and use the old security model.
    We have found that when users run queries against multi-providers they aren't authorized.  BEX states that the user doesnt have access.
    Should our old authorizations work with the old model against multi-providers?

    In theory yes ..
    Some Analysis ..
    from the S_RS_COMP
    goto RSECADMIN >Analysis>Execution as User -->enter the user name you are executing the query
    Check box -->with Log option
    select RSRT option
    hit start transaction button ,it should show you the authoriztion errors with authorization objects missed.
    if not
    again RSECADMIN>Analysis>Error Logs-->check with the latest time stamp for that particular user and analyse the authorization issues
    Hope it Helps
    Chetan
    @CP

  • Issues while generating the output(using VF02- header- output)

    Hi Group,
    I have issues while generating output using the tcode VF02.
    the issue is that, I have got an output type which is configured for the medium "Special Function" and the o/p program generates PDF depending on certain criteria.
    now, when I try to "repeat output" option to generate output again, I was getting errors. it works sometimes by choosing the option "Successfully processed" then selecting the record and then saving it. if I do the same thing again, the output make be running into error or success, it is varying everytime.
    I am not able to understand why the process is not working correctly, when doing the "Repeat output" option on the "Successfully processed" record, the system is giving error instead of a Successful message. it is succeeding once and sometimes not.
    Kindly let me know your inputs if you have encountered same kind of issue.
    Regards,
    Vishnu.

    hi Group,
    when I checked the configuration part of the o/p type I am currently processing, I could see that, in customizing part of this o/p type, there was a checkbox for Multiple Issuing - which is not checked.
    when it is not checked, it should not be possible to run the o/ps for multiple times, but when I tried to generate o/ps again and again, in a few attempts I could to generate the PDFs and in some cases not. I don't know why there is no relevance for this check box Multiple Issuing.
    Could you please let me know why this issuing of o/p is working in some occassions and not working work sometimes, which is  having the configuration of checkbox Multiple Issuing - not being checked.
    thanks for your help in advance.
    Regards,
    Vishnu.

  • Reporting authorization issue after BI 701 05 EHP1 upgrade

    Hello,
    We have recently upgraded our BI 7.0 to BI 701 EHP1 with 05 patch level. After this we had a problem with reporting authorizations for a report (query), which has created under Virtual Infoprovider.
    Earlier the report use to be execute perfectly with authorizations S_RS_ICUBE object with Act 03, Subobject DATA, but after upgrade to EHP1, while executing report its throwing a error pasted below.
    =============================================================================================
    "Diagnosis
    Errors occured while reading a VirtualProvider outside the BI system. Check whether the previous error messages contains any information about the possible cause of this error.
    It is possible that the error message can not be displayed because the error message class does not exist in the BI system. If this is the case, only the name of the error class and the message number are displayed. View the error class in the source system of the VirtualProvider.
    System Response
    Procedure
    Since the error is not necessarily in the BI system, there is no specific procedure for resolving it. With VirtualProviders, problems often occure with the connection to the system; these can lead to system termination. If the code for the VirtualProvider is not from the SAP, contact the relevant person to help resolve the issue.
    If an SQL error is listed in the previous message, see the procedure for SQL errors."
    ===============================================================================================
    After running st01 trace we identified the missing authorization is S_RS_ICUBE with Act 03, subobject DEFINATION.
    Here please tell why is the subobject check is performed to execute a report (query), as this is happening after EHP1 upgrade, so let me know if anyone had any clue on this ...
    Thanks

    Hi Martin,
    Thanks for reply.
    The assumption what you made are correct, but these are the possible reasons only. Is there any specific note or any info from sap that these changes came due to the new release change, so that i can tell my manager clearly.
    And I am not sure whether this is impacting the reports which using the VirtualProviders (Virtual CUBE) in place. If you could get bit more information that will be helpful...Thanks in advance.
    Sridhar

  • Authorization issue after upgrade

    Hi Everyone,
    We just upgraded from BI 3.5 to BI 7 last week.
    At the moment, there is an issue with Information Broadcaster now, all the information broadcaster settings are created by different business units general account  (Eg. BW_unitA, BW_unitB, each account only has access to their own workbooks).
    All IB settings are scheduled by BW analysts, some are run by process chain.
    After upgrade, most of IB jobs get error message in transaction code "RSRD_LOG": No authorization to scheduling workbook for user BW_unitA.
    Any suggestions welcome!
    Feng

    After upgrade, the authorizations will change or upgrade to 7.0 Authorization concept.
    Go to SU25 and generate the authorizations. sometimes, the authorizations would add in excess or it would be low after the upgade.
    So please check the roles and other authorizations which are assigned to the end users with the roles matrices that you designed,.
    Hope this would help you.

  • Query on new Authorization Objects after Upgrade&SAP_NEW profile

    Dear Experts,
    We have upgraded our system from 4.5 to 7.0 version,  i  was checking what are the new authorization Objects  introduced after upgrade comparing older system ojects.  I got few objects which are new in upgraded system,
    But when i check SAP_NEW profile,   and in the latest profile SAP_NEW_7000 profile i can not see all those new Ojects which are new.
    generally SAP_NEW should contain all new objects which come after upgrade?  i can see those in SAP_ALL  but not in SAP_NEW
    is there any issue  in system?  how should I know and where should i check what are the new Objects come in upgrade,
    Please advise.
    Thanks#Regards,
    Vijay

    Hi Jurjen Heeck ,
    see my previous post
    I did 'nt get this.
    SAP_NEW is your friend here
    does the SAP_NEW profile contains all the new authorization Objects.
    Regards,
    Anthony

  • Report Authorization issues after Authorization Migration in BI 7.0

    Hi SAPians,
    we are facing report access for the customers after migration of authorizations (3.x to 7.0). All these are Customer reports and need to restrict their customer codes only. In two ways, i have tried to resolved this.
    1. Roles - Maintained Customer Number in the authorized object CUSTOMER - Not working.
    2. Created new authorization object through RSECADMIN and maintained the Customer Number with proper activity, validity etc.. - Not Working
    (For Ex. Customer Number is "11500" and length of Char is 10)
    While executing the report, i am getting below error:
    Value "0000011500" for variable "Customer Authorization(Multiple Optional)" is invalid
    Message no. BRAIN643
    Diagnosis
    Characteristic value "0000011500" is not valid for variable Customer Authorization(Multiple Optional).
    Thanks and Regards,
    Venkat

    Hi,
    It depends of the way your authorizations has been setup. If you did it role based or profiles direct to the customer. You should also look into the fact that the migration tool can create direct a profile (not a role with a profile). My way of working in a role based application was that I looked for the roles with objects s_rs_mpro, s_rs_icub, s_rs_odso, s_rs_iset(these are the objects that needs to be replaced with RSECADMIN) and the own build objects with rssm. I added the authorization object s_rs_auth to the role and the new objects made with RSECADMIN. If you transport then the roles and objects made in RSECADMIN it works good. Bottom line beaware of profiles that are not created by the profile generator.
    Have fun
    Jan van Roest

  • Authorization issue after 7.0.1 update

    hi~
    since i updated iTunes 7.0.0 -> 7.0.1, the songs and TV shows (the free ones) i downloaded ask me to "authorize" them.... and what is very interesting is that i see that i have 2 machines autorized... when i have authorized 1 only....
    is it only me?????

    error message "some of the items in the iTunes library including "..." were not copied to the ipod "..." because you are not authorized to play them on this computer" total=93
    In 2 years I've had this computer and iPod this has never happened... what's going on? Why is it selectively telling me songs I own I'm not authorized to play? The only changes I've made lately is backing up my music to DVD-Rs using 'Back up to disc...".
    also, i noticed that it's asking me to use an email address to authorize it if I try to listen to these songs that is my personal address that is not a .mac or aol address, but not my .mac address, but if I enter a password or try to retrieve the password, it says the account doesn't exist. On my PC laptop, this email address is used as the account, however, this is happening on my MAC. Are the files confused thinking they are still on the PC? How do I stop that from happening?

  • Issue while generating Field catalog using LVC_VARIANT_SELECT

    Hello Folks,
      When i passed the default field catalog to the function module LVC_VARIANT_SELECT... for which the field name that is passed is standard field and the table name i was passing is Internal table ( Which is mandatory for my Req). As i am not passing the table name that exists at the DB level to the default field catalog .. this function module LVC_VARIANT_SELECT is returning all the field types as CHAR ( Irrespective of the field). This is causing me a problem in calculating totals ( standard functionality - throwing me message 'Column cannot be calculated' ) in my ALV_tree.
      I have to use the Function Module LVC_VARIANT_SELECT ( Since i have a variant logic associated) and the Internal table to generate the field catalog .and i want  to achieve the functionality of total,Avg ,,,,etc.. Any idea is appreciated.

    Got the Solution ... Passes Ref-table and Ref-field ... it gives totals for currency and quantity fields

  • Authorization issues after migrating user

    Hi Folks,
    I recently had a call with Apple about some permission problems when tryng to sync files between my iMac and MacBook.  They suggested I use the Migration Assitant to solve the matter, which I did, and I migrated my iMac admin to my MacBook.
    Most everything worked fine, however today when I synced my iPhone I had to authorize the MacBook again to catch a few apps, and now I have three of five computers authorized, yet I only have two macs as illustrated above.
    How do I get my "wasted" authorization back?
    Thanks for assistance.
    Inoshi

    I think you are not understanding - Deauthorize All. You are allowed to do ALL once a year - you can authorize/deauthorize single computers as many times as you want.
    By doing this you remove the authorizations of all computers to your account. You then reauthorize the computers that you want to have on the account. The next time you migrate to a new computer - simply deauthorize the old computer and authorize the new one.
    More info from Apple here - http://support.apple.com/kb/ht1420
    This is a viable solution.
    MJ

  • Authorization issue with VA02 radio buttons

    Hello All,
    We are stuck at one authorization issue. The user navigates using tcode VA02.
    1)     Execute Tcode -VA02=>
    2)     2) puts order number # 100001 =>
    3)     press enter =>
    4)     press enter =>
    5)     Screen: Change (Company Name) Return 100001: Overview =>
    6)     Option: Display doc. Header details (looks like a magnifying glass beside PO_date) =>
    7)     This bring us to Change (Company Name) Return 100001: header Data =>
    8)     select status tab =>
    9)     on Status tab lower end there is a button u201CObject Statusu201D =>
    10)     Press it => 
    11)     Come to Change Status :
    12)     On this screen There is Status with status no. on the right side with 7 options
    e.g:
    u2022     1 BLK Approval Required for,
    u2022     2 BL1 Approval for Credit,
    u2022     3 BL2 Approval for material Replacer
    We need to restrict the radio button access for user for which we are unable to find the authorization object.
    Could any one help.
    Thanks & Regards
    gab

    Hi,
    Use ST01 to trace the user activities and check which objects its hitting when you click on those buttons, then you can restrict radio buttons using those objects.
    I have'nt run the tcode myself and performed the steps you mentioned, but if you think its calling other transaction from those buttons you can manage tht in SE97, or add the t-code VA02 in the S_tcode auth object in PFCG.
    Hope this should get you going
    Thanks,
    Vijay

  • BW Issues while generating authorization profiles RSSB_GENERATE_AUTH progm.

    Hello,
    We loaded ZTCADS02 hierarchy datastore authorization template with the following data fields mapping and along with the other authorization templates (ZTCADS01, DS03)
    when I try to generate the authorization profiles using RSSB_GENERATE_AUTHORIZATIONS program, I am getting the following error
    “Hierarchy YES_BRANDS (version, key date 12/31/9999) does not exist  Message no. RSSBR050”
    Here are the fields and field contents on ZTCADS02 datastore. Am I loading wrong data to any of the fields?? I tried couple of combinations for Hierarchy name (0TCTHIENM) but none of this helps me in successful generation of the profiles.
    0TCTHIENM = YES_BRANDS/99991231//0BP_GRP
    0TCTHIENM = YES_BRANDS
    0TCTUSERNM     User                     CARLMGRN1
    0TCTSYSID     BW System     SBC100
    0TCTAUTH     Authorization (Tech)     ZBP_GRP
    0TCTADTO     Validity, to                     99991231
    0TCTIOBJNM     InfoObject                     0TCTAUTHH
    0TCTHIENM     Hierarchy Name     YES_BRANDS
    0TCTHIEVERS     Hierarchy Version     A
    0TCTHIEDATE     Hierarch, Valid to     99991231
    0TCTNIOBJNM     Node (InfoObject)     0BP_GRP
    0TCTATYPE     Type of Authorizatn     2
    0TCTOBJVERS     Object Version     A
    0TCTADFROM     Validity, from     20061113
    0TCTNODE     Nodes              454BA58E856300F6000000000A173125
    0TCTACOMPM     Validity Period     1
    0TCTTLEVEL     Hierarchy Level     9
    0TCTNDEF     Default Value     Y
    Infoobject to be checked is 0BP_GRP which is hierarchy check
    ZBP_GRP is custom authorization object created by me with fields actvt, 0BP_GRP and 0TCTAUTHH fields via RSSM
    All suggestions are really appreciated and promise to reward very good points,
    for all good answers.
    Regards
    Sreeni

    Issue is resolved. There was a problem with the data load.
    Thanks
    Sreeni

  • Generating profiles using ODSs

    Hi,
    When generating profiles using ODSs - one for the hierarchy and one for the value. What purpose do these 2 ODS do? Why is one for the Hierarchy and the one is for value?
    Thanks
    Will

    Hi Soumya,
    I am following the "how to generate BW authorization profiles from a flat file". Instead of using a flat file, I have created a table to read the values and fill the ODSs with the data by providing and mapping the fields for the ODSs.
    Would you happen to know what I should mapped these InfoObjects to:
    0TCTIOBJNM
    0TCTNIOBJNM for this one I am mapping it to 0HIER_NODE for text node
    0TCTNODE
    I am getting an error though:
    <i>Warning no authority for the node from characteristic 0sales_grp, hier ztest
    Warning your user master record is not sufficient maintained for object ZATH</i>
    I no longer use object ZATH but it is giving me an error.
    Would you happen to know what it is saying?
    Thanks

  • Issue while generating report using web.show_document with https

    Hi All,
    I am facing some issue while seeing the report using web.show_document as shown below:
    https://ucrmskr.apac.nsroot.net:10301/forms/html/001725032_gca.rtf_
    In this case the report opens directly without asking for me to save or open or cancel option
    whereas if I hit
    http://scrmskr.apac.nsroot.net:7801/forms/html/001725032_gca.rtf_
    it asks for save or open or cancel option
    so that I can save the report to my machine and open in wordpad format
    The report generated in the first case is not coming in proper format
    Below are my forms.conf mappings:
    # Name
    # forms.conf - Forms component Apache directives configuration file.
    # Purpose
    # It should include the weblogic managed server (routing) directives for
    # the servers where Forms applications are deployed and other miscellaneous
    # Forms component OHS directives.
    # Remarks
    # This file is included with the OHS configuration under
    # $OI/config/OHS/<OHS Node Name>/moduleconf sub-directory.
    # virtual mapping for the /forms/html mapping.
    RewriteEngine on
    RewriteRule ^/forms/html/(..*) /workaroundhtml/$1 [PT]
    AliasMatch ^/workaroundhtml/(..*) "/ucrmap1/weblogic/bea/ucrms/config/FormsComponent/forms/html/$1"
    RewriteRule ^/ucrms/icons/(..*) "/workaroundicons/$1" [PT]
    AliasMatch ^/workaroundicons/(..*) "/ucrmap1/weblogic/bea/ORA_PFRD/forms/java/$1"
    RewriteRule ^/forms/help/(..*) "/workaroundhelp/$1" [PT]
    AliasMatch ^/workaroundhelp/(..*) "/ucrmap1/ucrrgbg2/help/$1"
    <Location /forms>
    SetHandler weblogic-handler
    WebLogicCluster kauh0079:9001
    DynamicServerList OFF
    </Location>
    Please let me know what needs to be done additionally if we are trying to hit https because in the second case we were hitting http with similar mapping in diff environment and it was generating report successfully.
    Regards,
    Harish

    Thanks for answering,
    I changed the URL from
    http://nbotlaguduru.dms.local/export/FMSLaborChargesalcs20060829132645.pdf
    to
    http://nbotlaguduru.dms.local:8889/export/FMSLaborChargesalcs20060829132645.pdf
    and the same problem occured
    the file is located on my local C drive in:
    C:\lcs\export
    seems as though I am missing something else as well
    any ideas?

Maybe you are looking for