Authorization issues after migrating user

Hi Folks,
I recently had a call with Apple about some permission problems when tryng to sync files between my iMac and MacBook. They suggested I use the Migration Assitant to solve the matter, which I did, and I migrated my iMac admin to my MacBook.
Most everything worked fine, however today when I synced my iPhone I had to authorize the MacBook again to catch a few apps, and now I have three of five computers authorized, yet I only have two macs as illustrated above.
How do I get my "wasted" authorization back?
Thanks for assistance.
Inoshi

I think you are not understanding - Deauthorize All. You are allowed to do ALL once a year - you can authorize/deauthorize single computers as many times as you want.
By doing this you remove the authorizations of all computers to your account. You then reauthorize the computers that you want to have on the account. The next time you migrate to a new computer - simply deauthorize the old computer and authorize the new one.
More info from Apple here - http://support.apple.com/kb/ht1420
This is a viable solution.
MJ

Similar Messages

Authorization issue after the Support packs upgrade

We're having problem on authorization issue after the SP upgrade.
One issue if "You are not authorized to call up line item display" using FCH1 and FS10N tcodes.
And the SU53 showing problem on S_TCODE FAGLL03.
How are we going to solve this issue? We dont want to add this missing auth object on all our finance roles.
Thank you in advance.

How can i send you the trace file? What is your email address?
If I were you, I won't do that. Did you not ever sign some confidentiality agreement? I wonder.
Anyhoo... (copy right @ David)
What are the objects been caught in category RC=4, RC=12?
Relate them with functional aspect of the transaction (error screen)
Edited : You can paste RC=4, RC=12 objects here without customer specific value if you want to.
Regards,
Arpan Paik
Edited by: P Arpan on Aug 23, 2011 2:36 PM

Report Authorization issues after Authorization Migration in BI 7.0

Hi SAPians,
we are facing report access for the customers after migration of authorizations (3.x to 7.0). All these are Customer reports and need to restrict their customer codes only. In two ways, i have tried to resolved this.
1. Roles - Maintained Customer Number in the authorized object CUSTOMER - Not working.
2. Created new authorization object through RSECADMIN and maintained the Customer Number with proper activity, validity etc.. - Not Working
(For Ex. Customer Number is "11500" and length of Char is 10)
While executing the report, i am getting below error:
Value "0000011500" for variable "Customer Authorization(Multiple Optional)" is invalid
Message no. BRAIN643
Diagnosis
Characteristic value "0000011500" is not valid for variable Customer Authorization(Multiple Optional).
Thanks and Regards,
Venkat

Hi,
It depends of the way your authorizations has been setup. If you did it role based or profiles direct to the customer. You should also look into the fact that the migration tool can create direct a profile (not a role with a profile). My way of working in a role based application was that I looked for the roles with objects s_rs_mpro, s_rs_icub, s_rs_odso, s_rs_iset(these are the objects that needs to be replaced with RSECADMIN) and the own build objects with rssm. I added the authorization object s_rs_auth to the role and the new objects made with RSECADMIN. If you transport then the roles and objects made in RSECADMIN it works good. Bottom line beaware of profiles that are not created by the profile generator.
Have fun
Jan van Roest

Authorization issues after generating PFCG profile using CRMD_UI_ROLE_PREPA

Dear expert
We create a navigation bar profile and a business role. Then, we generated a PFCG profile for this business role to gather all the authorization object required to meet the functionality provided in this business role. For that, we used the program CRMD_UI_ROLE_PREPARE and then, imported file in our PFCG profile.
But after assigning the user to this business role and PFCG profile, we still have authorization issues. For example, the result lists are not displayed.
The kind of error we get is:
+Cannot display view BP_CONT/ContactDetails
An exception has occurred Exception Class CX_BSP_DLC_CONFIG_GENERAL_ERR - Error creating configuration model
Method: CL_BSP_DLC_VIEW_DESCRIPTOR=>LOAD_APPL_MODEL
Source Text Row: 14
Cannot display view BP_ADDR/StandardAddress
An exception has occurred Exception Class CX_BSP_DLC_CONFIG_GENERAL_ERR - Error creating configuration model
Method: CL_BSP_DLC_VIEW_DESCRIPTOR=>LOAD_APPL_MODEL
Source Text Row: 14 +
Thanks in advance for your help
Best regards
Stephanie

Hi,
It is not a short dump but an exception raised in the new UI:
Cannot display view BP_CONT/ContactDetails
An exception has occurred Exception Class CX_BSP_DLC_CONFIG_GENERAL_ERR - Error creating configuration model
Method: CL_BSP_DLC_VIEW_DESCRIPTOR=>LOAD_APPL_MODEL
Source Text Row: 14
Stephanie
Edited by: Stephanie Blouin on Oct 23, 2008 7:48 AM

HR Authorization issue for specfic User

Dear all,
One of the HR user , he can run payroll on particular site ,
i have assigned Org key of site to master data on the particular role .
User tried to run payroll using pa30 with personnel no (one of store user) .
but system is not take any value and its not showing any error also .
For example pls check below detail i have tried my user id and system has shows below details of the user (below details is one of the store user ).
Personnel no.   2941
Name         A Mohammed Younus
Personnel ar ZOSO                            EE group   A
Subarea      STCH                            EE subgrp 3E
Kindly suggest to resolve the issue
Note : 1, i have deleted the user and i have recreated role .
2, i have copied another user role (he can run payroll) to effected user ,even though he cant able to run payroll.
Edited by: satheesh0812 on Dec 17, 2010 9:29 AM

Dear all,
I dont thing so there is no issue with Role ,only issue with Structure Auth..
Becoz pls check below Authorization Object.
Changed    HR: Master Data
Authorization level            E, M, R, W
Infotype                       *
Personnel Area                 *
Employee Group                 *
Employee Subgroup              *
Subtype                        *
Organizational Key             20000156, 20000157, 20000201
In OOSP for particular Org key .
Auth profile              Auth.Profile name
CTHR_CHENNAI     CTHR_Chen
Auth profile             No Plan Vers Obj Type   Object I         Maint Eval.path Status vec
CTHR_CHENNAI     1     01               O                   20000156              O-S-P     12
CTHR_CHENNAI     2     01               O                  20000157             O-S-P     12
CTHR_CHENNAI     3     01               O                  20000201            O-S-P     12
In OOSB details
IN OOSB I have assigned Authorization profile to UserXXX, user can see all employee details in PA30 except one employee details , can
User name Autho.profile                           Start date        End date            Exclustion Display Objects
XXXX          CTHR_CHENNAI                     01.01.2005     31.12.9999
If i give Autho.profile --> all instead of CTHR_CHENNAI ..
HR executive can able see all employee details in PA30 ...
Let me know where exactly issue is there ...
Kindly suggest...

Issue after Migration: ID and Content-ID are different in SOAP Payload

Hi Experts,
I am facing a strange issue in the PI landscape after the migration from XI 3.0 to PI 7.1.
The scenario is from R/3 system to TIBCO System (Proxy-to-SOAP). The TIBCO system receives the file in SOAP Format. The message is sent from PI via SOAP adapter to TIBCO System.
There is a attachment coming from the R/3 System along with the main message and the main payload/message has a "attachment-ID" as a field. Earlier what used to happen in XI 3.0 that the "Attachment-ID" used to equal to the "Content-ID" when the SOAP payload was generated at the TIBCO end. Now after migration, in PI 7.1 the "Attachment-ID" and "Content-ID" are different. We have control over the "Attachment-ID" as it is coming from the source payload but we do not have any control over the "Content-ID" as we are not creating it.
Can anyone of you please let me know how the SOAP Payload is created and how the content-ID gets populated in the Header of the SOAP Envelope? Also, can anyone help me to fix this issue? Is it something which needs to be handled by us or the BASIS Team?
Thanks,
Arkesh
Edited by: Arkesh Sharma on Dec 16, 2011 12:53 PM

Hi Ramesh,
Thank You for the very Helpful Answer. Before I proceed and close this thread, I have one more question which comes to my mind:
I create my own SOAP Header if I apply the solution provided by you then will the rest of the details in the SOAP Header payload will change or do I need to customize it for myself? For e.g., there is a field named MessageId in the SOAP Header. If I write a Java Mapping, do I need to manually populate the MessageId field in the SOAP Header of my java code or will it be automatically populated?
My requirement is to change only the content ID of the SOAP Header Payload and the rest of the fields should remain the same as it is. Is it possible with the approach that you mentioned above?
Thanks,
Arkesh

Authorization issue after technical upgrade

We just completed an uprade to BI 7.0 SP 15. We only want to complete a technical upgrade and use the old security model.
We have found that when users run queries against multi-providers they aren't authorized. BEX states that the user doesnt have access.
Should our old authorizations work with the old model against multi-providers?

In theory yes ..
Some Analysis ..
from the S_RS_COMP
goto RSECADMIN >Analysis>Execution as User -->enter the user name you are executing the query
Check box -->with Log option
select RSRT option
hit start transaction button ,it should show you the authoriztion errors with authorization objects missed.
if not
again RSECADMIN>Analysis>Error Logs-->check with the latest time stamp for that particular user and analyse the authorization issues
Hope it Helps
Chetan
@CP

Invalid username or password after migrating user BIEE11g

Hi,
I have migrated user (e.g. user_1) from dev to another uat. according to :
http://www.obieetalk.com/oracle-biee-11g-%E2%80%93-migrating-security-%E2%80%93-identity-stores-%E2%80%93-part-1
When i login uat as "user_1", it encounter errors:
====================
Unable to Sign In
An invalid User Name or Password was entered.
====================
1) I found that security realm: myrealm is default realm, and the new created one: newrealm (containing user_1) is not default one.
2) I then create a new user: user_a under myrealm, and this new account work normally.
Is this problem resolved by setting newrealm as default realm? if yes, how to do this?

Hi J.,
Is this problem resolved by setting newrealm as default realm?
if yes, how to do this? Or just delete the default Releam: myrealm?

Issues after migrating from 3.0.6.6.5 to 3.0.9.8.3A

G'day All,
Over the last week or so I have performed some test migrations using copies
of our production Portal environment and here are some of the issues that I have encountered.
ISSUE 1 - Performance
Using a stopwatch (primitive, I know) I visited a few parts of our Portal and recorded timings
Performance did not improve dramatically. In fact, after the 3.0.9.8.3A patch, some things slowed right down.
I tested using a Sun Ultra 80 (2 x 450MHz CPUs) our Development host.
(I also tested using a spare Ultra 10 (1 x 333MHz) This was MUCH slower than the numbers seen below)
In all the timings below, I did the following:
1.Logged on as PORTAL30 this takes me to the Portal Home page showing the Build tab
2. Clicked on the Navigator icon
3. From the Navigator Pages section, I clicked on our company homepage
4. From the Main tab on the company homepage, I clicked on our Customer Service tab (one of many that we have)
5. Click on the Ops & Security tab (another one of ours)
6. Click on Logout
Timings are in SECONDS. I ran thru the process at least 3 times and recorded
the final 2 timings to allow for the first time thru populating caches etc.
Pre migration - Portal 3.0.6.6.5 iAS 1.0.2.0.1
Log in          4     3
Navigator     3     3
Homepage     3     3
First tab     4     3
Second tab     3     3
Logout          1     1
Post iAS migration - Portal 3.0.6.6.5 iAS 1.0.2.2.0
Log in          4     3
Navigator     3     3
Homepage     3     3
First tab     4     4
Second tab     3     4
Logout          1     1
** No significant difference
Post Portal migration - Portal 3.0.9.8.2 iAS 1.0.2.2.0
Log in          3     3
Navigator     3     3
Homepage     3     4
First tab     4     4
Second tab     3     3
Logout          1     1
** No significant difference
Post iAS Patch 1866039 Required by Portal 3.0.9.8.3A
Log in          3     3
Navigator     3     3
Homepage     4     4
First tab     4     4
Second tab     3     3
Logout          1     1
** No significant difference
Post Portal migration - Portal 3.0.9.8.3A iAS 1.0.2.2.0
Log in          3     3
Navigator     19     19 !!!!!!!!
Homepage     20     21 !!!!!!!!
First tab     3     3
Second tab     3     3
Logout          1     1
** Bringing up Navigator and the first page from Navigator now takes ages.
Analysing PORTAL30 objects using wwsbr_stats.gather_stats made no difference
to the above timings.
Anyone have any ideas about this???
Bear in mind that this slow down probably only affects me as the
developer since end users pretty much stick to the tabs on the homepage
and never need to use Navigator.
And end user login and presentation of the company homepages takes about 4 seconds.
ISSUE 2 - Fonts
During the migration, many of our developed forms/reports now contain headings/labels that
are so small as to be unreadable (eg 1 point in size)
This seems to be due to the fact that originally the fonts were sized as (-3, -2, -1, 0, +1, +2, +3)
relative sizing. This has been screwed up during migration and has ended up as fonts
being sized 1, 2, 3 points in size.
I will have to visit each form and report and set sizes accordingly.
The PEOPLE_APP application supplied by Oracle also suffers from this problem and is a little harder
to fix. (Check Metalink)
ISSUE 3 - Menu permissions
I have a couple of menus that are only viewable by certain groups.
This permission disappeared along the way leaving the menu NOT visible to anyone.
I will have to visited each menu and set permissions once again.
I hope this list may help others embarking on the same migration path.
I would highly recommend copying your production environment and practising on the copy first.
Regards,
Tony Cook
eSign Australia
[email protected]

Further to the performance problem above, I found the following bug on Metalink:
Bug Number: 2391402
PERFOMANCE DEGRADATION WITH 3.0.9.8.3 ON IE
Funnily enough, this bug was meant to be addressed by the 3.0.9.8.3A patch that I had already applied.
After reading the bug report I added the following line to httpd.conf
BrowserMatch "MSIE" nokeepalive downgrade-1.0 force-response-1.0
I am now seeing the following timings
Log in          3     3
Navigator     3     3 !!!!!!!!
Homepage     3     3 !!!!!!!!
First tab     3     3
Second tab     3     3
Logout          1     1
There is a 15 second timeout that was adding to the response times I was seeing prior
to making the change to the httpd.conf file eg. 19 seconds down to 3ish
Regards,
Tony Cook
eSign Australia
[email protected]

Authorization issue after upgrade

Hi Everyone,
We just upgraded from BI 3.5 to BI 7 last week.
At the moment, there is an issue with Information Broadcaster now, all the information broadcaster settings are created by different business units general account (Eg. BW_unitA, BW_unitB, each account only has access to their own workbooks).
All IB settings are scheduled by BW analysts, some are run by process chain.
After upgrade, most of IB jobs get error message in transaction code "RSRD_LOG": No authorization to scheduling workbook for user BW_unitA.
Any suggestions welcome!
Feng

After upgrade, the authorizations will change or upgrade to 7.0 Authorization concept.
Go to SU25 and generate the authorizations. sometimes, the authorizations would add in excess or it would be low after the upgade.
So please check the roles and other authorizations which are assigned to the end users with the roles matrices that you designed,.
Hope this would help you.

Mail Enabled Public Folder Issues after migration online

Hi
We have recently migrated our Legacy (Exchange 2010) Public Folder Infrastructure to Exchange Online - we have a hybrid setup, SSO and DirSync.
We initially had an issue where some of our mail enabled public folders had lost their link with the associated MailPublicFolder objects and as such could not receive email.
We resolved this issue ourselves however we are now experiencing a different issue which i believe should be easily resolvable however this isn't the case at the minute.
The issue is that when a user emails a Mail Enabled Public folder Exchange online is attempting to relay the email back to our onPrem servers. This is occuring for the bulk of our Mail Enabled Public Folders - we have ~1200 of these. The only
folders that are working as expected are those that had the initial issue above and for which we had to remove and re mail enable these folders. We also had to recreate any secondary smtp address for these folders. This accounts for 88 of our total
MEPFs.
I have checked the attributes on the MailPublicFolder objects for those that are not working and those that are functioning as expected. The only difference in these that I can see is that the MEPFs with the issue have a value set in the ExternalEmailAddressAttribute.
I have tried to programatically set this value to $Null however i receive the following error:
The external e-mail address $null is not an SMTP e-mail address.
I have also tried the following : set-mailpublicfolder -Identity "MEPF"-ExternalEmailAddress "<not set>"
with the same resultAttempting to use the following syntax -externalemailaddress @{remove=$oldAddress} returns the following error:
Cannot process argument transformation on parameter 'ExternalEmailAddress'.Cannot convert the "System.Collections.Hashtable" value of type"System.Collections.Hashtable" to type "Microsoft.Exchange.Data.ProxyAddress".
At present the only fix that I have for this is to take a copy of the email addresses for an affected public folder, Mail disable it, wait for the object to be cleared, re-enable the public folder as a mail public folder and then re-add the email addresses.
This is ok on an adhoc basis but not for the ~1200 folders that are affected. Especially when from what i can see it should be relatively straightforward to resolve this with a simple PowerShell script.
I do have a case open with MS for this but I am hoping that somebody here can help also.
Thanks
Joe

Ok so i fixed it myself.
The thinking here is that the ExternalEmailAddress was set using the Primary SMTP address while the Public Folders were on premises.
In order to get the required information we ran a script to export all the MailPublicFolder objects which had a value in the ExternalEmailAddress attribute. We exported the Name, ExternalEmailAddress and GUID
We then ran a second script to export the Identity, MailRecipientGuid from Get-PublicFolder -recurse.
The MailRecipientGUID is what ties the Mail Enabled Public folder to the MailPublicFolder object.
Using Excel I then matched the two up and created a csv file with the Identity Attribute from the get-PublicFolder command and the ExternalEmailAddress Attribute from Get-MailPublicFolder.
The following script then used this csv file to first Mail Disable the Public Folder, then Mail Enable the Public Folder.
Once these steps have been completed the final stage is to add the SMTP address back in to the Public folder.
To do this it is necessary to retrieve the new MailRecipientGUID and use it to return the MailPublicFolder for the Set-MailPublicFolder command.
I was happy to use this script after i tested with a small subset of the data. It is provided as is with no guarantee that it will be suitable for you to use and any use of this script is at your own risk.
Script to Automatically fix brokenn Public Folder Objects
Created By: Joe McGrath
Created On: 18/02/2014
$Path = "C:\PublicFolders.csv"
import-csv -Path $Path | ForEach-Object `
Disable-MailPublicFolder -identity $_.Identity -Confirm:$False
Write-Host "Broken Public Folders Now Mail Disabled"
Write-Host "Waiting for commands to be fully processed online - the script will continue in 5 minutes"
Start-Sleep 300
Write-Host "Re MailEnabling Public Folders"
import-csv -Path $Path | ForEach-Object `
Enable-MailPublicFolder -identity $_.Identity
Write-host "Broken Public Folders now enabled"
Write-Host "Now waiting to allow online service to catch up - script will continute in 5 minutes"
Start-Sleep 300
Write-Host "Updating email addresses for broken public folders"
import-csv -Path $Path | ForEach-Object `
$NewPF = get-publicfolder -identity $_.Identity
Write-Host $NewPF.Identity
Write-host $newPF.MailRecipientGuid
$EmailAddresses = $_.AdditionalEMailAddresses
$NewMailPF = get-MailPublicFolder -resultsize unlimited | Where-Object {$_.Guid -eq $NewPF.MailRecipientGuid}
Set-MailPublicFolder -identity $NewMailPF.identity -EmailAddressPolicyEnabled:$FALSE
Set-MailPublicFolder -identity $NewMailPF.identity -EmailAddresses $EmailAddresses -EmailAddressPolicyEnabled:$FALSE
Set-MailPublicFolder -identity $NewMailPF.identity -EmailAddressPolicyEnabled:$TRUE
$EmailAddresses = ""
Write-Host "Completed!"

Serious issue after Migration Assistant

Hi all-
Looking for feedback as to what in **** might be going on with my MacBook Pro and how to proceed with it.
Last weekend I bought a 27" iMac for my home office. For various reasons I did not transfer data from my laptop at the time of setup, but the next night.
When I went to use Migration Assistant (after reading a bit on here about it), everything went fine until I actually entered the code the network code the iMac gave me and tried to start the transfer. The MacBook Pro wouldn't respond; the iMac told me it wasn't responding, and the MBP wouldn't quit Migration Assistant. Even after waiting an hour, Migration Assistant was still frozen, so I did a "hard" power off with the power button.
When I went to restart, the drive started, startup chimed, but the screen stayed black. I had to leave for work, so hard-turned it off again and left it alone. When I returned to it last night, I got past the black screen but it would stay in grey screen for around 7-8 minutes, then alternated every 10-15 seconds between a light blue screen with the spinning spokes wheel (not rainbow) and a slightly darker blue window with no spokes. It went back and forth like this for maybe 5 minutes, so I shut the MBP off again and went through the whole process a second time with the same result.
Since I live almost 4 hours from the nearest Apple Store, and Support was closed, I used my Snow Leopard disk to repair permissions - there were a lot of repairs. I then repaired disk, and was told the disk was fine. I restarted, same grey-light blue-dark blue issues, so reinstalled Snow Leopard.
After the OS reinstall, everything restarted and worked fine! I did a software update, then on the second software update (which as I recall was just java and iTunes) things went south again. When I restarted after the second software update the screen did the black thing again. Keys are lighting up, chime happens, but no screen.
The other thing that is different this time is that the green light on the power cable is not lighting up and I cannot seem to boot to the Snow Leopard disk, so I can't even get back to the post-OS-reinstall-pre-software-update stage again to get my data off the machine.
Not sure what to do next! This sound like a clear-cut issue of the X or the Y to anyone? Any feedback is appreciated.
With blessings,
Matthew

Did you use Setup Assistant when your new Mac first started up, or skip that, create a user account, then use the Migration Assistant app in your Applications/Utilties folder?
If you used Setup Assistant, when you started your first backup you should have gotten the message in #B5 of Time Machine - Troubleshooting. It sounds like you didn't (or chose Start New Backup). And no, the Leopard procedure doesn't work on Snow Leopard. That's what #B5 is for.
Usually, if you use Setup Assistant, Time Machine will still say it's going to do a full backup, and make room for it, but actually do an incremental backup (very, very slowly).
Either way, it usually deletes a lot of old backups. We're hoping that will be fixed in Lion.
Once it's decide to make a new backup, there's no known way to prevent it.

Application Issues after deleting user account

I have an imac with several user accounts setup. two of the accounts are admin.
User1 Admin
User2 Admin
sysadmin Admin
User3 User
User4 User
User5 User
User6 User
User1 purchased a new macbook pro and we migrated all of her docs and applications to the macbook pro. after seeing that everything was working well, we deleted her old account on the imac from the "System Preferences/Accounts" tab from User2's account.
Here's the issue:
Now when User2 tries to install or update applications, the system responds with a permissions error message. You do not have sufficient permissions to modify this application's settings. We also run into stange errors while just using some applications
Most applications on the machine were installed by User1 before deleting the account. Did sysadmin inherit ownership of applications and library settings of User1 upon deletion?
Is there anyway to change the settings for all applications to allow User2 (admin group) to update and install applications? Could I just change the ownership group for sysadmin directories to admin with Read & Write?
Thanks,
LeoK

Exactly what did you do to remove your old account? I hope you didn't just drag it to the Trash. If so then you don't have an account because dragging the old Home folder to the Trash is not how you remove an account.
You say you "edited" a new account. How did you do this?

Access request List issue after migration

I have migrated site sharePoint 2013 from metalogix tool.
Migration is from SharePoint 2013 to SharPoint 2013
I am getting one strange error while approving "Permission request" send by the users. I have matched columns of Access Request list(Hidden) from original site to New site , columns are matching, and also I have checked every column
on migrated site, ther are opening without error, so why I am getting this error , there are no logs for this.
One thing is diffrent is that on migrated site I am not gettign any data from Permission column check below, however On original site I am gettign data for this Permission column , what can be an issus ?
Please mark answer , if you think answer is helpful or correct.

Hello WillAdams92,
It seems you are experiencing permissions issues. You can repair permissions using Disk Utility, which comes with all Macs. The following article provides more information about the feature:
About Disk Utility's Repair Disk Permissions feature - Apple Support
Thank you for contributing to Apple Support Communities.
Cheers,
Bobby_D

Reporting authorization issue after BI 701 05 EHP1 upgrade

Hello,
We have recently upgraded our BI 7.0 to BI 701 EHP1 with 05 patch level. After this we had a problem with reporting authorizations for a report (query), which has created under Virtual Infoprovider.
Earlier the report use to be execute perfectly with authorizations S_RS_ICUBE object with Act 03, Subobject DATA, but after upgrade to EHP1, while executing report its throwing a error pasted below.
=============================================================================================
"Diagnosis
Errors occured while reading a VirtualProvider outside the BI system. Check whether the previous error messages contains any information about the possible cause of this error.
It is possible that the error message can not be displayed because the error message class does not exist in the BI system. If this is the case, only the name of the error class and the message number are displayed. View the error class in the source system of the VirtualProvider.
System Response
Procedure
Since the error is not necessarily in the BI system, there is no specific procedure for resolving it. With VirtualProviders, problems often occure with the connection to the system; these can lead to system termination. If the code for the VirtualProvider is not from the SAP, contact the relevant person to help resolve the issue.
If an SQL error is listed in the previous message, see the procedure for SQL errors."
===============================================================================================
After running st01 trace we identified the missing authorization is S_RS_ICUBE with Act 03, subobject DEFINATION.
Here please tell why is the subobject check is performed to execute a report (query), as this is happening after EHP1 upgrade, so let me know if anyone had any clue on this ...
Thanks

Hi Martin,
Thanks for reply.
The assumption what you made are correct, but these are the possible reasons only. Is there any specific note or any info from sap that these changes came due to the new release change, so that i can tell my manager clearly.
And I am not sure whether this is impacting the reports which using the VirtualProviders (Virtual CUBE) in place. If you could get bit more information that will be helpful...Thanks in advance.
Sridhar

Authorization issues after migrating user

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for