Automate or Script to complete PG user association and Disassociation

Customer is facing this problem again and again . LCP and RCP ports needs to be disassociate and associate.
Is there any way we can automate if we know the ports so that only  one script can be run and finish the task  instead of doing one by one.                  

Hi Prashanth,
Yes, we can achieve this by doing some automation tool.
This automation tool will perform this activities plus more(agent,Supervisor,DN,call type creation, call type and script association etc.....), i would request you to inform your customer to contact @ the below mentioned address for the product features,
SERVION Global Solutions
http://www.servion.com/contact-us.aspx
Regards,
Srinivasan
Please rate if this help

Similar Messages

  • Wireless device associating and disassociating fro...

    HH3 version A arrived recently to replace a faulty HH1 (why didn't I get a version B?), and in the log, one of our wireless devices, even though it's in standby, is associationg and disassociating from the HH every 5 mins or so
    I've switched it from 802.11b/g/n because one of the PCs 'only' has an 802.11g wireless adaptor. 
    From the log
    12:31:51, 25 Sep. (660121.260000) Device disconnected: Hostname: Wii IP: 192.168.1.72 MAC: 00:22:aa:29:d7:da
    12:31:50, 25 Sep. ath0: STA 00:22:aa:29:d7:da IEEE 802.11: Client disassociated
    12:31:40, 25 Sep. (660109.750000) Lease for IP 192.168.1.72 renewed by host Wii (MAC 00:22:aa:29:d7:da). Lease duration: 30240 min
    12:31:40, 25 Sep. (660109.750000) Device connected: Hostname: Wii IP: 192.168.1.72 MAC: 00:22:aa:29:d7:da Lease time: 30240 min. Link rate: 24.0 Mbps
    12:31:40, 25 Sep. (660109.730000) Lease requested
    12:31:39, 25 Sep. ath0: STA 00:22:aa:29:d7:da IEEE 802.11: Client associated
    12:27:51, 25 Sep. (659881.070000) Device disconnected: Hostname: Wii IP: 192.168.1.72 MAC: 00:22:aa:29:d7:da
    12:27:50, 25 Sep. ath0: STA 00:22:aa:29:d7:da IEEE 802.11: Client disassociated
    12:27:40, 25 Sep. (659869.920000) Lease for IP 192.168.1.72 renewed by host Wii (MAC 00:22:aa:29:d7:da). Lease duration: 30240 min
    12:27:40, 25 Sep. (659869.910000) Device connected: Hostname: Wii IP: 192.168.1.72 MAC: 00:22:aa:29:d7:da Lease time: 30240 min. Link rate: 11.0 Mbps
    12:27:40, 25 Sep. (659869.900000) Lease requested
    12:27:39, 25 Sep. ath0: STA 00:22:aa:29:d7:da IEEE 802.11: Client associated
    and the same at 12.21, 12.16, 12.11, etc
    What's going on, and how should I iron it out?

    It looks like an issue with the Wii. You could try altering the settings on the Wii, to give it a static IP address.
    See
    Using static IP addresses on your home network
    It should not keep disassociating with the home hub.Try changing the home hub encryption to WPA only.
    There are some useful help pages here, for BT Broadband customers only, on my personal website.
    BT Broadband customers - help with broadband, WiFi, networking, e-mail and phones.

  • LWAPP 1130AG constantly associating and disassociating

    Hi,
    I have inherited a LWAPP system with around 40 1130AGs and a single 4400 WLC which all work fine.
    I attempted to upgrade a 1130 Autonomous to LWAPP and it said it worked using the upgrade tool and c1130-rcvk9w8-tar.123-11JX1 image.
    I checked the WLC and initially could see that the WAP was downloading the image from the WLC, but since then it constantly says this on the WLC:
    AP Disassociated. Base Radio MAC:*************
    AP Associated. Base Radio MAC: *****************
    I have done debug lwapp events enable on the WLC and all it says regarding the WAP is:
    Tue Jul 14 13:22:20 2009: ************* Received LWAPP DISCOVERY REQUEST from AP ************** to ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff on port '2'
    And that's it. Nothing else.
    I've added the Mac address into the WLC AP Authorization list as a MIC.
    I'm trying to get the public key hash using debug pm pki enable using Putty, but when I put in this command, it logs a huge amount of stuff and then Putty simply closes, without logging the needed info. Is there any other way to get this, or stop the session from closing?
    Any ideas on getting the 1130AG working?

    Sounds like you have a duplicate IP address issue. If the AP is associating to the WLC and then a duplicate address is dicovered the AP will temporarily lose IP connectivity, pick up the same IP address again and keep going round in circles.
    How is the AP obtaining its IP address? If you are using a server check the leases and exclude any static addresses issued. If you are using the WLC DHCP server be careful as they aren't intelligent enough to discover conflicts.
    If all else fails do a port span of the WLC uplink and post the trace. If you see the AP transmitting LWAPP traffic to the AP manager, then after a minute it is doing a DHCP Discover then it is defintely IP conflicts.
    You can also configure the AP with a known unused static IP address with the command 'lwapp ap ip address x.x.x.x x.x.x.x'

  • Access Points keep associating and disassociating from WLC

    I have numerous access points, both 3502 and 3602's that are connected to Cisco 2960s POE switches that will disassociate and then reassociate themselves with the WLC.  The WLC and access points are running 7.4.110.0.  The particaular Cisco 2960s POE switch in this case is running 12.2(55)SE3, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1).   This is becoming a widespread issue.

    When the AP recovers, what is the physical up time and WLC association time. 
    Now if your AP(s) regularly reboots then I'd consider you test the cable runs using the on-board TDR feature of your switch.

  • Completely new user id when changing email?

    Do you get a completely new user id and consequently lose all post history when updating your e-mail address? (as seems to have happened to me)
    Ta,
    Trent

    trent wrote:
    Yeah... too late, I thought it would have been linked - especially since I saw no warnings. No mind I have changed my handle. Was kinda hoping it was just a delay to link my account to existing posts/points. But i think after 5 days it's not going to happen :(. Will just have to do as suggested and bookmark my old handle.Jives giveth.. Jives taketh... Rejoice that Jives has given you the opportunity to start afresh... to build a new reputation using a new email addy and handle... with a fresh flame thrower. Praise be Jives!
    <i>PS. What? Think you won't be crazy after 10 years dealing with Jives on OTN?</i>

  • MySites User Profiles and User Hidden List

    I would like to automatically activate all user profiles so I can assign an administrator to update all user information. The environment does have MySites setup but no one has permissions to create their own MySite site. Therefore,
    when a user navigates to their profile page to edit their profile information they visit the URL http://server/MySiteSiteCollection/_layouts/15/start.aspx#/Person.aspx?accountname=domain\user
    Right now, the administrator can only edit user profiles where the user had previously visited their user profile page, thus activating their user profile, which I assume adds an item to the hidden user list. However, the administrator cannot edit
    any user profiles where the user had not yet visited their user profile site, thus generating an error. I would like to enable/activate all user profiles automatically without having to contact each user separately and asking them to visit their
    profile page just to get it enabled for editing.
    Does anyone know if there is a way via PowerShell to activate all user profiles?
    Environment: SharePoint 2013

    That is probably the best, most consistent way. It would be isolated to that particular SA, so there shouldn't be security concerns. Otherwise you'll constantly run into this issue.
    This should work with SharePoint 2013:
    http://blog.bugrapostaci.com/2011/10/03/create-all-users-personal-site-via-powershell-script-sharepoint-2010/
    But you'd need to continually run it to capture new users.
    Another one specifically for 2013 if the above doesn't work:
    http://www.getinthesky.com/2014/04/powershell-create-mysites-users/
    Trevor Seward
    Follow or contact me at...
    This post is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect the opinion or view of Microsoft, its employees, or other MVPs.

  • Help creating a script to move users in and out of an OU based on a time limit

    Here's my scenario: we currently have OUs based on the locations of our facilities, we also have a sub-OU(?) underneath it for users that need a group policy applied to them where whitelist applications allowed to run. From time to time we have need to pull
    users out of that sub-OU for a short period of time to let them run applications they normally wouldn't be able to and won't need to run long term. Sometimes we also forget to add these people back into that policy controlled sub-OU because we get busy do
    other things. Server is 2008 R2.
    Here's what I'm looking for: A script that prompts for the users name, pulls that user out of the sub-OU, puts them in the main OU but only for 24 hours. After that time limit is up, a script/command runs that puts the user back in the policy controlled
    sub-OU. I'm thinking a PS script would be the best way to do this.
    Research: Looking at these posts here and here I'm
    thinking I should be able to Frankenstein something together but I have very limited PS scripting experience.
    Can anyone help me create this?

    You've probably figured this out, but we're not typically in the business of writing complete solutions for people. With that said, there are projects I find particularly interesting, such as this one, where I am willing to help get someone started if they
    are willing to take the time to work through the examples and learn from them.
    You have two requests - one is a script that prompts for a user it then moves to a different  location in Active Directory. The second request is a way to move them back without manual interaction. This will require an automated task (scheduled task)
    that will run at select times during a day.
    Here's the first script (1/2): The first two lines set two different variables. The first line sets the $OUPath variable to the SubOU. The second line prompts for a user and, once a user is entered, sets that user to the $User variable. It then runs the
    first try-catch, attempting to replace the $User variable with the data returned from the Get-ADUser cmdlet. Notice the use of the -Properties parameter. By default the modified date and the extensionAttributes are not returned. We will be using the modified
    date so we can be certain that 24 hours passes before we move them back (see part 2/2). Including extensionAttribute13 will ensure we only move users out of the OU if they were moved in by the script. Note: The modified date on a user in AD is changed when
    it is moved from one OU to another. If the user cannot be located in the first try-catch it will say it cannot locate the user in Active Directory. If it can locate it, it will set the $User variable, as described so far, and then move on.
    In the second (or, nested) try-catch we split the user's DistingusihedName at the first comma so that we have two parts. We use the second part (that doesn't include their CN) and see if that matches the $OUPath variable. If it does match then that user
    has already been moved. If it doesn't match then we 1. Move the user, 2. Replace extensionAttribute13 with the string 'MovedUser,' and 3. Output that the user has been moved.
    $OUPath = 'OU=SubOU,OU=MainOU,DC=mydomain,DC=com'
    $User = Read-Host -Prompt 'Enter SamAccountName'
    try {
    $User = Get-ADUser -Identity $User -Properties Modified,extensionAttribute13
    try {
    If ($User.DistinguishedName.Split(',',2) -eq $OUPath) {
    Write-Output -Verbose 'User already moved.'
    } Else {
    Move-ADObject -Identity $User.DistinguishedName -TargetPath $OUPath
    Set-ADUser -Identity $User.SamAccountName -Replace @{extensionAttribute13='MovedUser'}
    Write-Output "'$($User.SamAccountName)' has been moved."
    catch {
    Write-Output "'$($User.SamAccountName)' cannot be moved."
    catch {
    Write-Output -Verbose "Unable to locate '$User' in Active Directory."
    The second script (2/2): Here we also set a couple variables - one is the SubOU's DistinguishedName where we want to return the user and the other is the all of the users from the MainOU. Foreach user in $Users we check if their extensionAttribute13 is set
    to 'MovedUser' and if their modified date is greater than or equal (-ge) to 24 hours. If it is, the script will move the user, clear extensionAttribute13, and let us know the user was moved. If for some reason your $OUPath variable is wrong, the script will
    run the catch portion of the only try-catch we used in this script. Again, you'll have to schedule Task Scheduler to run this script. Good luck!
    $OUPath = 'OU=MainOU,DC=mydomain,DC=com'
    $Users = Get-ADUser -Filter * -SearchBase $OUPath -Properties Modified,extensionAttribute13
    Foreach ($User in $Users) {
    $TimeSince = New-TimeSpan -Start $User.Modified -End (Get-Date)
    If ($User.extensionAttribute13 -eq 'MovedUser' -and $TimeSince.Hours -ge 24) {
    try {
    Move-ADObject -Identity $User.DistinguishedName -TargetPath $OUPath
    Set-ADUser -Identity $User.SamAccountName -Clear extensionAttribute13
    Write-Output "$($User.SamAccountName) has been moved."
    catch {
    Write-Output "$($User.SamAccountName) cannot be moved."
    } Else {
    Write-Output 'No Users to move.'
    If you decide to use this, be sure to change the paths you use for the $OUPath variables. Also, if you're using this with PowerShell 2.0, you will need to use the Import-Module cmdlet to import the ActiveDirectory module. In versions above 2.0 it will be
    imported automatically if you try to use an AD cmdlet.
    Edit: Typo - Get-ADUser property

  • Automate the creation of Active Directory users with organization/address information

    On one of our Domain Controllers we regularly have to create new users with fully populated organisation/address information, as they use a server-side application which appends email signatures at the end of all of their emails created from this information.
    At the moment we have to fill this information out manually and it can sometimes cause inconsistencies if the information is not uniform or is typed incorrectly.
    Is there any way to automate this/do it in bulk?

    This is another Powershell script that can be used:
    http://www.wictorwilen.se/how-to-use-powershell-to-populate-active-directory-with-plenty-enough-users-for-sharepoint
    Note that you have two ways to do that:
    Create a new User account Provisioning script and include the Street update as part of it
    Have a daily scheduled script that will run against your users OUs and update the Street address for user accounts having it wrong or missing
    From my point of view, option 2 would be the best as it will make a Bulk update and Bulk correction if required.
    This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties or guarantees , and confers no rights.

  • How to create and add a logon/logoff script to populate last user into the computer field in AD

    Hi All,
    Bit stuck here,
    Not sure what forum to put this is as it involves different subjects,
    I work in a Server 2008 RT environment and have access to Active Directory etc.
    I saw this a few weeks ago - http://ivan.dretvic.com/2012/10/automatically-generate-description-field-for-computers-in-active-directory/
    Now, I'm not particularly sure what to do here, I don't know how to create a group policy etc. How to implement it in a test environment etc. Never done this before.
    Can somebody give me a step by step guide on literally everything that would be involved in this?
    Or any links that may be able to help?
    I basically want the AD to show who was the last user that logged into a specific client when the client named is searched for in the Computers OU, and if possible being able to pull the make/model and serial number from the client aswell.
    If possible there should be a way of including this with the existing login script that we already have, how can I do this?
    I've tried a few so far and got stuck, I have domain admin priveledges also.
    Thanks,
    Regards, Max.

    Hi Max,
    Please refer to the following article to learn how to create a logon/logoff script via GPO:
    Assign User Logon Scripts
    Assign User Logoff Scripts
    As for the issues about script, this is the forum to discuss questions about driectory service, better to post your question to the forum for Script:
    http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/home?forum=scripting
    The reason why we recommend posting appropriately is you will get the most qualified pool of respondents, and other partners who read the forums regularly can either share their knowledge or
    learn from your interaction with us.
    Thank you for your understanding.
    Regards,
    Lany Zhang

  • How to install and set printer paper and tray automatically via script or batch file

    Hi,
    Our firm using HP Printers and we need to deploy printer in Citrix Environment where setting does not save to the Base PC Image.
    Because our Environment is Citrix (User Settings and Printer are deployed when user login).
    Can we build the setting into the Base PC Image for All users?
    Printer get install when using login.
    Problem that I am encounter right now are:
    1. How to correctly identify all tray from each printer.
    2. How to set all paper tray to A4
    I am currently using Powershell Script to install printers during login, all the printer driver has been installed to the Base PC Image.
    But the trouble I have is when the script run to completion.
    It only added the printer.
    I've been googling, but I can't find a way to detect printer tray or how to set all the tray to A4.
    I don't mind using any type of script/batch file or even program.
    Any of the following language is C#, VB.NET, powershell, vbscript or Event Access to HP API ?
    Our Environment:
    Windows 7 x32 SP1
    Windows Server 2008 R2 (Print Server)
    I am using the PCL 6 Printer Driver.
    Our Printers are:
    HP LJ CP1025NW
    HP C LJ 4650
    HP C LJ 3525
    HP LJ 1045
    HP LJ 2050
    HP LJ 3055
    HP LJ 4015
    HP LJ 4350
    HP LJ 4700
    HP LJ 2035n
    Thanks in advance
    Regards Dat.

    Most of those printers are commercial grade printers.  It would be best to post in the commercial LaserJet forums.
    ↙-----------How do I give Kudos?| How do I mark a post as Solved? ----------------↓

  • Automatically accept screen sharing from specific user ???

    My mother is a newbie mac user. To be honest, she's a newbie computer user - full stop. She did inherit my PC laptop when I switched, but within a week she had crashed it. The mac she has is still running. (And guess who got it for her. I'm a good daughter.)
    Anyway - her G4 Powermac is running Leopard like a dream. In fact it is much faster now than before. Still, she has a few issues. Like the other day, she couldn't get music through her speakers and I'm abroad at the time.
    I asked her to accept a screen share, she did. I fixed the speaker issue and closed the screen share. She is happy as larry. But that got me thinking. Is it possible to automatically accept screen share from certain users? That would be a great help if that would be possible.
    Thanks in advance.

    Musicsites, here is your answer. Just follow the instructions completely and it will work quite well. I have it running and it allows my iMac to automatically answer incoming Screen Sharing requests ONLY from my MacBook.
    <http://www.getstonered.com/2007/11/applescript-automatically-accept-ichat.html>
    Mike

  • ALUI Gateway Not Returning Scripts for Subset of Users

    We have a problem where the ALUI gateway is not returning some .NET scripts for a subset of users. We have the ALUI 6.5 portal and our using the .NET accelerator 3.1.
    The situation is that this subset of users request one of our portal pages via https, which then reaches through our firewall to our remote server which is running the .NET portlet. The .NET page is served and returned to the users correctly and quickly, but this particular subset of users do not see the result rendered in their browsers for about 3 minutes. A view html source in the browser, as well as tools like Fiddler, show the page is indeed in the browser, but it is stuck trying to request some .NET scripts, and only displays the page when those requests timeout.
    The .NET scripts that are problems are both WebResource.axd and ScriptResource.axd, which in some cases are in our .NET portlets because of the .NET framework itself, but in other cases they are there only because of the ALUI portal itself, when it munges the .NET portlet to handle multiple server forms and validators and such. These .axd scripts are gatewayed so that the client browser requests them through the ALUI gateway, which in turn requests them through our firewall to our remote server -- which always serves these scripts correctly and quickly according to the IIS logs. The problem seems to lie in the ALUI gateway, as it is receiving these scripts correctly and quickly, but it is not returning them to this subset of users. Instead the ALUI gateway seems to be processing for about 3 minutes, and eventually returns an html error page, which of course the client never sees since it is expecting javascript, but we can capture the error page via Fiddler and its just telling us there was a timeout -- the client browser just notes that there is a javascript error.
    The really bizarre part is that this only happens for a subset of users, which amounts to about 20% of our users. There are 2 things that delineate these users that we have found so far. First, these users have email addresses that are 27 - 30 characters long, and the email address is our login id. Note that both shorter and longer email addresses are OK, so there is not some limit to email addresses like this might sound like at first. Secondly, these users have to be in a particular branch of our ldap store, which means they are replicated across to the portal in a particular group. We can move these "bad" users into another branch of our ldap store and once they are replicated to the portal then they work fine, and then if we move them back they return to not working. We cannot find any other difference in our ldap branches or in the corresponding ALUI groups, plus its only the ones in that particular branch with the email lengths in that very specific range.
    The gatewayed requests for these scripts vary by user since the PTARGS in the gatewayed request include the integer userid, but that does not seem to matter because we can have a "good" user successfully request the script with a "bad" user's id, and we can have a "bad" user fail to successfully request the script with a "good" user's id. That seems to point to maybe the authentication cookie being the differentiating factor that determines whether or not a gatewayed request for one of these script files will succeed or fail. So far we have only seen the problem with these particular .net axd scripts, but that may simply be because we don't have many, if any, other scripts or resources that need to be gatewayed since we usually put resources on our imageserver -- these being different because .NET and/or the ALUI portal puts these references in there for us whether we like it or not. Long-term we can re-architect our .NET portlets to not get have these axd scripts, although as mentioned earlier, we also see the ALUI portal put these axd scripts in our portlets as part of their munging process -- so that is not in our control completely. We do need to test if this subset of users can successfully request other gatewayed resources or not -- this is actually the first time I thought of that test case, so all I can say right now is its axd scripts that we know are problems, but it may or may not be a bigger problem.
    One last comment, as we appear to have found a work-around, but it does not make sense at all, and its not our preferred solution, so we still very much believe there is a problem elsewhere -- most likely in the ALUI gateway, but possibly somehow related to authentication that we do not understand. Our work-around that so far seems to work is to make our remote server be accessed via https instead of http -- which matches the way the client browsers call our portal (https). Again that first doesn't make sense, since this is only a problem for a small subset of users -- obviously calling our remote server via http works successfully for all other users, so its not just is a simple case that we must match protocols or it won't work. We also use http successfully for our calls to the remote server for portlets that are Java, although its possible that they don't have any gatewayed resources. But we also would just prefer to not use https for our internal calls in our own network as there is no need for the extra overhead -- and by the way our dev and qa environments do use http even for these .NET portlets and do not have the same problem. What's different in our production environment? The only things that should be different are that we have multiple portal servers and multiple remote servers that are load balanced (not sure that's the right term for how the remote servers are combined) -- and of course we have a firewall between them that does not exist in dev or qa.
    So we would very much appreciate any thoughts on this, whether you've seen something like it before, or just have some additional insight into the gateway and/or authentication process that seems to be the issue.
    Thanks, Paul Wilson

    We've ran into this problem when using the Microsoft ReportViewer control. In our case, we found that the portal gateway malformed the urls containing webresource.axd, so the browser was unable to get the correct address to the files. Note that there are usually multiple links to the axd files, they return different resources depending on the query string they get.
    To solve the problem, we ended up with a bit of a hack solution, but it works well. We extracted the resources we needed from the ReportViewer control's assembly using Reflector, and then published them on the image server. The next piece was to override the Render method of the page that hosted the control. In our custom version of Render, we parsed the html of the page, and replaced the contents of the src= elements with pt:images// links. These processed just fine in the portal's transformer, and our resources started showing up.
    Our Render looks something like the following code sample. The "HACKReportViewerControlPortalImageGatewayFix" class has all of the code to do the parsing. In this case, it is specific to the report viewer, because it has some special considerations for parsing the urls. My bet if that your code will be quite custom as well. Therefore, I've not included this piece of code. The important piece below is the invocation of MyBase.Render, which tells the page to render all of it's contents. Once that method is done, all of the HTML for the page is in the writer. The ModifyImageTags method then parses the html, doing the necessary replacements. Finally, the modified html is written to the page's writer, so it can be output following the normal .net processes. Also note that when parsing for urls to replace, don't do all of them, just look for the ones containing axd.
    (VB.NET)
    Protected Overrides Sub Render(ByVal writer As System.Web.UI.HtmlTextWriter)
              Dim fixer As New HACKReportViewerControlPortalImageGatewayFix
              MyBase.Render(fixer.GetWriter)
              writer.Write(fixer.ModifyImageTags())
    End Sub
    This works great for images. However, if you are dealing with javascripts, I'm not sure if this will work for you - as some .NET controls send different scripts depending on the browser. For example, in IE, you get more buttons on the toolbar for the ReportViewer, so you get more javascript too. When using FF, you get less buttons, and less script. We didn't have a problem with the scripts, so we haven't needed to solve this one.
    As for timing, this type of solution doesn't take much to put together. You are really just doing some string parsing and replacements. If you are a regex ninja, it's probably even easier. We had our solution working in a day or two.
    An added benefit to this solution is that you are putting less bytes through the portal's gateway, and sending that traffic to the image server instead.

  • Why does unchecking the "use automatic configuration script" box on Internet Explorer 8 fix connectivity errors?

    As long as I have been in the job and we have been using IE as our browser, we have controlled the proxy settings with an automatic configuration file.
    Recently, with IE8 on WinXP and Win7, we have had situations with the user getting various connectivity errors. By unchecking the "use automatic configuration script" box, they start working. But we don't change anything else.
    These error are not consistent from machine to machine.
    We are in a AD Domain environment
    These are the two errors I have documented.
    Error: 5
    Description: The 'Microsoft.ACE.OLEDB.12.0' provider is not registered on the local machine.
    Access to resrouce is forbidden by server while attempting to access server at
    http://content.mpl.org/cgi-bin/admin/pwtest.exe?CISOVER=60.
    Please check the permissions to the file on th eserver.
    Two very different problems. Both somehow fixed by unchecking the box.
    The config file itself has not been changed in over a year.
    Can anyone explain why unchecking this box, but not making any other changes to the proxy settings would fix connectivity problems? These are all external sites that need to go through the proxy.
    Thanks.

    Hi,
    You can use the steps in the following thread to disable this option:
    uncheck "use automatic configuration script" in IE LAN settings 
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/winserverGP/thread/05a7c683-075e-435c-8583-da8fd3559cf2
    Or try to
    reset Internet Explorer settings and select use automatic configuration script to see whether it could work.
    Hope this helps.
    Vincent Wang
    TechNet Community Support

  • How to hide user id and password in batch scripts

    Hi,
    Can some one help me to hide the user id and password in batch scripts that used to automate Export and Action script execution process.
    Context : In my project client doesn't want display user id and password hence they are looking for secured way to hide them.
    Thanks for your answer in advance.
    Regards,
    Sainath.

    Sainath,
    Referring admin guide as mentioned by Craig is good option.
    Let me give you few steps that I did in one of my projects.
    Open command prompt and navigate to the path "C:\Oracle\Middleware\EPMSystem11R1\products\DataRelationshipManagement\client\batch-client".. here you can see many see other utilities as well.
    drm-batch-client-credentials.exe is the one used to encrypt the userid and password.
    open this in command prompt and then choose the application to which you want to encrypt the password.
    then remove userid and password from batch script then run it... it does what you want

  • Everytime i start firefox, I get a window that says:A script on this page may be busy, or it may have stopped responding. You can stop the script now, or you can continue to see if the script will complete.

    Each time i open Firefox, i get a window opening saying:A script on this page may be busy, or it may have stopped responding. You can stop the script now, or you can continue to see if the script will complete.
    Script: file:///C:/Program%20Files/Mozilla%20Firefox/components/nsBrowserContentHandler.js:619
    When i try again, i get the same result, if I continue, nothing happens for a few minutes then fire fox opens with awindow saying to start again.
    == This happened ==
    Every time Firefox opened
    == I installed Firefox ==
    == User Agent ==
    Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 6.0; Trident/4.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; .NET CLR 3.5.30729)

    Start Firefox in [[Safe Mode]] to check if one of your add-ons is causing your problem (switch to the DEFAULT theme: Tools > Add-ons > Themes).
    See [[Troubleshooting extensions and themes]] and [[Troubleshooting plugins]]
    If it does work in Safe-mode then disable all your extensions and then try to find which is causing it by enabling one at a time until the problem reappears.
    You can use "Disable all add-ons" on the ''Safe mode'' start window.
    You have to close and restart Firefox after each change via "File > Exit" (on Mac: "Firefox > Quit")

Maybe you are looking for