Automatic recording of changes - transports not created

Hello
I have strange problem with ERP2004 customizing system.
I have 2 clients in the system: customizing and test client.
While customizing work system doesn't show screen with selection of transport request, and some changes are not recorded in transports. What could be the reason? Automatic recording of changes is enabled in customizing client. Sometimes editing client in SCC4 helps - but for a short time.

Hello,
Transport request will be created for all the changes made in customization or workbench changes. Every customization/workbech object may create seprate change request. When you are doing customization for a object, first time you will be prompted for Transport request. After creating new transport request further chnages you will not be asked becuase your changes for the same object and changes will be saved in the same transport. Once you relesed the transport then again when you do any changes you will be prompted for new transport.
Cheers,
-Sunil

Similar Messages

Automatic recording of changes in SCC4

Hello,
I'm on BI 7.0 SAP_ABA 700-015 (SAPKA70015). The settings on SCC4 are set on customizing, and automatic recording of changes.
Unfortunatly once I create a new infoobject (or other BI object) I do not get a transport request.
Thanks,
Tomer Steinberg.

Most BI objects are considered local when they are created initially due to sometimes complex relationships between objects. SAP supplies the Transport Connection in the Administration Workbench, transaction RSA1, for transporting these objects. Once you have transported them the first time using RSA1, which assigns the object to a transport package, SAP will keep track of changes to the same objects and will then record them in change requests automatically. The online help or help.sap.com provides additional details on the process involved.
Note that this process is not used for client-independent objects such as programs or security roles.

Change version not creates some times in GOA

Hello All
there is one piece of field in GOA will not create a change version.
as i know any piece of data changes will create a new versiona and workflow will get triggered.
i wanted to know which field changes will not create a Change version in GOA ?
any ppointers -->docuemnts ,, etc .
muthu

some times change version was not created and approval also not trigered .
From BBP_PD, do you see the new historical version at the bottom of the page? More importantly, was your change recorded in the document?
so i wanted to see what are the field changes in GOA will not create a change version.
should i look only CDI ?
I don't think CDHDR or CDITM would determine if or not the fields would create version. Versioning is very SRM specific.
i could not see any any docuemnts. for eg. if i attach any change version must create right?
I would think so - when you just add a new attachment, a new version should be created. However, that said, I still think the table BBPD_COMP_FIELDS is the place to define the triggering of new version.
versions created. but logs are captured but i donot see attachemnts,
Come again? What logs did you mean? Did you mean that you added an attachment but after you saved it (release the contract), the attachment disappeared?

Stock transport not creating entry in MARD

Hi,
I have created a stock transport order UB from one storage location to another within the same plant.
I created a delivery and posted the goods issue. It generated a material document with movement type 641.
The delivery is not yet received in the receiving storage location.
Now, the problem is that the quantity does not show as "stock in transfer" in the Plant stock view of the material master.
Also, the value for MARD-UMLME is zero, even though I have posted the GI for the delivery and not done any GR in the receiving storage location.
Does anyone know what is wrong?
Regards,
Ola

MARD-UMLME
Stock in transfer (from one storage location to another)
Quantity that has already been withdrawn from the issuing storage
location but has not yet arrived at the receiving storage location.
This stock in transfer contains the quantity being transferred as the
result of transfer postings in Inventory Management, but not the
quantity being transferred on the basis of stock transport orders.
See OSS note 25220:
When goods issue is posted for a cross-company purchase order (for a delivery with movement type 643), stock in transit is not updated in the receiving plant.
Cause and prerequisites
This procedure was chosen because usually the issuing and receiving companies have to be managed on different computers. In addition, goods receipt in the receiving plant can be posted before goods issue in the issuing plant with this kind of stock transfer, i.e., the corresponding stock in transit would temporarily be negative.
Solution
You can use the reporting function in Purchasing to display the stock quantities in transit.
Starting with release 3.0D, the stock found with cross-company orders in transit is displayed in the stock overview (transaction MMBE) as well as displayed dynamically determined in the plant availability (MB53).

Automatic payments details changing does not work

Hello Comcast team,
I have signed on automatic payment of my Comcast bills form my First Tech VISA credit card.
Since First Tech moves from Visa to Master Card partner, I changed the payment method from credit card to the checking account on July 29, 2015. I got the following confirmation from Comcast:
Thank you! Changes to your automatic payment settings will begin with your next bill.
I was sure I did everything that was needed, however today I checked my account and found the automatic payment was not pass, and now the bill sum is $116.44 instead of $39.99.
I made the payment of $39.99 immediately and now I have a question:
- what was the reason of such a bill sum and how that problem can be solved?
Thank you.
Nick.

Yes, I did, since I first thought that was a Mellel-only problem. But now that OmniOutliner also started showing these symptoms, I thought I’d also report it here.
No results so far regarding my reports to 3rd party developers… If I hear something, then I’ll report here.

Changes are not automaticlly recording.

Hello all,
In our ECC dev system I tried to maintain an entry in SM30 u2013 u201C CRMRFCPARu201D .
But as per the client settings it must store this chhanges which I made in CRMRFCPAR in some change request. But it is not storing.Can any body telll me the reason and also how to amke this automatically store in change request.
Client settings are as follows.
Changes and Transports of client seecific objects
--> Automatic recording of changes.
Cross-client Object Changes
--> Changes to repository and cross client customizing allowed
Protection lievel 0
eCATT and CATT Allowed.
Regards,
Sekhar

we have to make the system modifible in se06 also.

Request is not created for in the development client

Our MM Consultant is add the new plant in the development client in the T-code SPRO (logistic general- tax and goods movements - india - basic settings - maintain plant settings)and he need to create the request for the same to transport that to the quality client for the testing purpose. but he is unable to create the request. there in the screen it is showing that the data is saved but it need to ask to create the request... please to the needful
i had checked the scc4 client setting that and all is fine
like
Client role customizing
automatic recording of changes
changes to repository and customizing requests is allowed
protetion level is 0
catt and ecatt allowed
regards,
praveen
basis consulatnt

> that is fine , for every customizing table the request is not creating, in the status bar it is showing that the data is saved....
Please check if the user has any open transport request where those entries are doing to.
> i am not getting that where it is saving and which request i need to transport from the dev 100 to quality
In case you can't fix it/find out open an OSS call. Very difficult to suggest something without having system access.
Markus

To create the follow up transaction automatically on status change in sap crm?

To create the follow up transaction automatically on status change in sap crm? If yes, how to make the setting for this?

Hi vishal,
As per the requirement transaction type is activity(ACTI) & sales order(TA). when the take order objective is complete system automaticaly craete a new activity of tele sales call or metting with wholesaler.
this is requirement of client.
now i am already create all type of transaction types of activity & sales order & create follow up transaction also. i have doam already create action profile also but when i am assign this action profile to transaction & try to create an sales order no follow up transaction could be create automatically. i think the condition is not right so please help me out in this. what should be the start & schedulec condition for this scenerio

Change Pointers not being created for HR-PA Custom Infotype

Problem Description:
We have a custom Infotype in SAP to store the data for contingent employee - Infotype 9001. Change pointers is
turned on. We are running the program RBDMIDOC to send changes to Oracle IDM using message HRMD_A. The change
detected for all infotypes except 9001. For 9001, the change pointer is not created.
The following are the current configuration details:
IDOC Extension Created to Idoc type HRMD_A07 (ZHR_EXT)
custom segment zhr_seg
Change pointers are switched on.
Change pointers switched on for message Type HRMD_A.
IDOC configuration created for Port / Process code etc.
Maintenance of view T777D - Added ZHR_SEG.
If I add the segment ZHR_SEG as a 2nd segment to Infotype 0000, I dont get a syntax error. But the changes for Infotype 9001 are not picked up.
If I add the segment ZHR_SEG as a segment to Infotype 9001, I get a syntax error - check EDI: Syntax error in IDoc (mandatory segment missing) below.
EDI: Syntax error in IDoc (mandatory segment missing)
Message no. E0072
Diagnosis
The segment ZHR9001 has the attribute 'Mandatory' in the syntax description of the basic type HRMD_A07 (customer enhancement ZHR_EXT). However, the segment is missing in the IDoc. The segment number logged in the status record identifies the item before which the segment is missing.
This error may have been triggered by an unidentifiable segment before the expected mandatory segment.
Procedure
Please check the IDoc or the syntax description of the basic type HRMD_A07 (customer enhancement ZHR_EXT).

Were you able to resolve the issue?
If yes, could you please share what was done to resolve it.
Your help will be greatly appreciated.

SRM Purchase Order not Created Automatically

SRM 7.0 Extended Classic Scenario:
Issue: When creating a standard shopping cart in SRM the Purchase Order is not created in SRM (or in R3). Eventhough the shopping cart is fully approved and has a vendor assigned. The overall shopping cart status remains approved,the line items status shows 'item in transfer process'. Otherwise there are no errors in the application monitor. Nothing appears in table BBP_DOCUMENT_TAB
Considerations: Everything is working fine for limit shopping cart, the PO gets created automatically and the SC has status follow-on document created.
Also, this was working fine for standard orders, it seems that support pack 7 or 8 broke this functionality, yet I do not see any notes regarding the issue. Any ideas on what controls the automatic PO generation or how it could work for limits but not standard SC's would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Matt
Edited by: Matt Joseph on Nov 17, 2010 10:27 AM

First of all PO should be created then you can see entry in doc table.
u Note 1480994 - How to process a shopping cart with status I1111?
see SAP treatment and some work around..
Symptom
Shopping Cart is stuck in status I1111 (Item in transfer process).
Other terms
Application Monitor, I1112, I1111, Monitor Shopping Cart
Reason and Prerequisites
This is a FAQ note, which shows how to treat such Shopping Carts.
Solution
Shopping Cart status I1111 (Item in transfer process) is a temporary status, which means that shopping cart is being processed in order to generate a follow-on document.
However, it is possible that status I1111 becomes permanent and, in this case, shopping cart status is inconsistent.
There are some procedures to be considered when shopping cart is stuck in status I1111.
Report BBP_ALERT_SB_NOTTRANSFERED is available to change the status of the shopping cart item from I1111 to 'Error in transmission' (I1112) and later on, it is possible to retransfer this shopping cart from Application Monitor/Monitor Shopping Cart transactions.
Note 441768 provides more information about this report.
However, BBP_ALERT_SB_NOTTRANSFERED works in a time stamp. BBP_ALERT_SB_NOTTRANSFERED will check shopping carts created after date specified in table BBP_CONTROL.
To check this information, go to SE16 -> BBP_CONTROL and as input parameter provide the report name. Here you will see the last date that report has been run.
If you have a shopping cart in status I1111 which is older than date specified in table BBP_CONTROL, you have to change manually the time stamp specified in such table. You have to specify an older date (before shopping cart creation).
Doing this, you can run report BBP_ALERT_SB_NOTTRANSFERED and cart in question will have status I1112 assigned.
Once status I1112 is assigned to shopping cart, you can retransfer it from Application Monitor (BBPWEBMONITOR transaction in SAP_GUI) or Monitor Shopping Cart in the web.
To transfer Shopping Carts from BBPWEBMONITOR, some settings need to be done.
Following notes should be considered:
550044
FAQ Alert monitor RZ20 does not show any alerts
396102
BBP Alert monitor RZ20 does not work
387701
The Shopping Card are not transfered after "resubmit"
According note 387701, workflows WS10000214 and WS10000215 have to be activated. One of them is to delete shopping cart item using Application Monitor and the other one is to resubmit the cart. Then, once this settings are done, you can retransfer I1112 carts from Application Monitor.
If all settings are done and you have a cart with status I1112 that it is not appearing in Application Monitor, report BBP_ALERT_SC_STATUS_ERROR is available, which checks the carts in status I1112 and put them in the Application Monitor, in order to allow you to transfer them again. Note 631513 explains about this report.
Additional notes to be considered in this scenario:
1159609
Transfer function does not create local purchase orders
1233037
BBP_MON_SC: Shopping cart transfer ends in status I1111
1040878
Cannot transfer shopping carts with status I1112
Header Data
Release Status: Released for Customer
Released on: 09.08.2010 16:04:09
Master Language: English
Priority: Recommendations/additional info
Category: Consulting
Primary Component: SRM-EBP-SHP Shopping Cart
Secondary Components: SRM-EBP-APM Application Monitors
Affected Releases
Release-Independent
Related Notes
1233037 - BBP_MON_SC: Shopping cart transfer ends in status I1111
1159609 - Transfer function does not create local purchase orders
1040878 - Cannot transfer shopping carts with status I1112

After transport, changes are not updating

hi..........
We are configured two clients as master client(009) and test client(008) in one DEV machine.
i performed one transport from 009 to 008.( i released through scc1 and imported in 008 through scc1) it's transported successfully.
but our consultant saying that, those changes is not updating in client 008.
i performed so many transports to 008 and also to prd. before and after.
then why the changes were not updating in 008, to that particular request?he created another request with the same issue and i transported it.again same problem. is there any thing to check from basis side?
(4.7E,mssql,widows 2003 server)
Please help me.................

Hello,
Check the transport log. Even it is saying Sucessfully Imported, just open it, read it.
And check the size of the transport request also.
And another option is add this particular request with another request and transport it. Check for anything is happening....
I don't think anything balance has left from basis side....
Note: Points always encourage me to reply !!

T522N Changes are not reflecting automatically

Dear Experts,
I changed Name format(01) in customization table T522N. After this if I go to PA0020, I am not able to see the name (P0001-ENAME) in new format. They are still appearing as in old format. If I change anything in PA0030 (eg : IT0002 values) and save it, then i can see the new name format for that particular person. In brief, T522N changes are not getting reflected automatically. Go and change each and every records manually is not practical. Kindly suggest some solution for this. Thnaks in advance.
Regards,
Jijeesh

Hi,
im no HR expert,
just doing a search in google for table T522N it says there is a macro for that:
RP-SET-NAME-FORMAT
Hope it helps.
Best regards.

IView and system admin objects appear changed or not registered when transported

Hi,
Recently we moved a few objects - iViews, pages and roles as epa and system admin objects as config archive and imported them manually to Test system. But when checked in the next landscape, the iView properties appear different. Eg. In Development system, the iView was unchecked for visibility option i.e. iView should not be visible. But when transported to test system, the property was checked and gave error. On reimporting, the same thing happened and we had to manually correct the property. This is not an expected behaviour and manual changes are not to happen after development changes.
Similarly, though config archive import showed the 2 new system objects in the respective location of Test system, the expected functionality was not working. I checked this by deleting one of them and manually creating the same entry and it worked fine. So I also had to delete the 2nd one and create a manual entry. The system admin objects we used pertained to System Configuration --> Content Mgmt--> Form Based Publishing --> Forms Availablity --> Folder Settings
We also moved kmcs and they are reflecting properly with correct folder permissions.
We don't understand why this is so occurring (iView and system admin entry appearing different or not getting registered )and never experienced such a case in previous projects. We don't want to face the issue going forward when transporting changes to staging and Prod systems.
Please assist as to what went wrong or any probable cause and solution for same.
Thanks,
Janani

Hi,
Has anyone faced such a situation before and know the reason for same ?
Regards,
Janani

Captivate 4 Automatic Recording does not record application

Windows 7 64bit, Captivate 4.01. Run as Administrator. Create Project>Software Simulation>Record Application - Microsoft Excel 2010. Automatic Recording selected - mode doesn't matter, but Demonstration and Assessment checked. Start recording with red button. All settings default. After lots of moving around, typing, clicking, etc. in window, I can't stop recording using End key - I have to click on the CP icon in the Notification Area icon to stop recording. The resulting project is a single slide without any of the actions recorded. To repeat - I did start Captivate by right clicking on the desktop icon and selecting Run as Administrator.
Anyone resolve this issue? I did try searching the forum before posting, but maybe it isn't IE9 compatible as I got 0 results - even when searcing for "Captivate 4 Windows 7"

Captivate 4 CAN sometimes work fine on Windows 7 64bit systems. It does on mine, but not all users report this success.
Before you go and buy Cp 5.5 you might as well try the different compatibility settings to see if one of them will work for you.
Another thing to be aware of is that Captivate doesn't always capture every single screen event for some programs. So with the project you found resulted in a single slide, were you hearing the camera shutter sound at regular intervals? If not, it may be simply that Captivate wasn't "seeing" the events on screen and you might have needed to do more manual captures to get everything.

LSMW not creating session for more than 1000 records

Hi all
I am doing LSMW for equipment creation (IE01) using recording
all are correct if i upload I have 2400 records to be uploaded,in the last step
it showing "BDC_Insert,Transcation is invalid"
If i upload for less then 1000 records like 950, its succefully creating
sessions.
PLease its very urgent, let me know
Thanks in advance

Hi Chandra,
In filed mapping step END_OF_RECORD change the value of field g_cnt_transactions_group to value more than 5000. I think this value is less than 1000 for your case.
at_first_transfer_record.
if g_cnt_transactions_group = 5000.
g_cnt_transactions_group = 0.
transfer_record.
endif.
If you are not able to see the END_OF_RECORD in field mapping do the following steps:
Extras menu-> Layout check all check boxes it will appear.
Regards,
Rajesh Sanapala.

Automatic recording of changes - transports not created

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for