Automatic transcode settings can't close DVD image in standard 4,7gb size

So I have this feature film of a marriage 1h30m long that Encore refuses to generate an ISO of standard DVD size. The point is, for some reason this project in particular is generating a 6gb image, in the settings that even 2h10m fits standard DVD size. What am I doing wrong? What to do now?
Encore 5.1

On an automatic transcode, Encore uses what you have already transcoded in the project plus menus, motion menus, etc, and uses settings to fit the rest on the disk. If you transcode some assets early, then others later, Encore will transcode the first ones at higher bitrates and not be able to go low enough to get the others to fit.
I have not tested whether this will actually result in too big for the disk, but I suspect it might.
You could look at the transcoded files in the Encore folders and check them with mediainfo or gspot for bitrate to see if they vary.

Similar Messages

  • My phone is stack on settings can't close page or even phone

    My phone is stack on settings ,can't close page app or even phone

    Try a reset, hold the power button and the home button until you see the apple then let go. You will not lose any data, this is a simple reboot of the phone.

  • "automatic" transcode settings is not filling my DVD capacity

    I've put together four AVI files in Encore and every time I go through the "build" process 20 GB worth of material is reduced down to 720 MB (approx).  I always thought that a great advantage in using Encore was that it filled your material to fit the medium.  I'm using a DVD not CD giving me more than 4GB.  How do I get "build" to maximize my project into a single DVD, or DVD image?
    Thanks...

    "What version of Encore?"   Encore cs4
    "Do you have any material in the DVD-ROM content?  (Look on the build tab.)"  Yes, it indicates 526 KB used for DVD-ROM content.
    " Is it "Untranscoded" and "Automatic"?"      Untranscoded.
    "In the Project Settings, Advanced tab, what do you have set for the maximum Audio/Video Datarate?"   8.0 Mbps
    As no changes were made from my original setup, my results are the same: Format: DVD; Output: DVD Image; Disc Info: 723.2 MB used, 3.96 GB free.  My four AVI files total about 20 GB.  Again, my original question, why doesn't Encore use up another 3 GB to maximize the data available which must produce a better running DVD video than information on a mere 723 MB?
    I do thank you for your assistance.  I'm sure that there must be something else I'm missing.
    Howard

  • Where Do I Find Encore's Automatic Transcode Settings?

    I am putting the finishing touches on a 1.75hr, NTSC 4:3, 5.1 (AC3), 2 lead-in AVIs, one Main Menu + 3 Scene Selection Menus (non-animated) and one Play All Playlist Project and have done several +RW burns to check things out. Everything fits nicely on 4.3GB +RW.
    Now my questions: everything has been set to DVD-5, and Encore to Automatic. I have looked for the Transcode settings, but cannot find them. I have read through the manual, F1 and Jeff Bellunes Encore Focal Guide, but cannot find what I am looking for now. The Audio and Video quality are good, but I do not mind going to a DVD-9 (DL), if I can increase either. Where do I look to find what Encore chose? If I want to do DL at max. quality and bitrate of 7, do I need to set the Transcode settings of each Video Asset? This project will only play on set-top DVD players, and most are fairly recent models, that all handle DL.
    As is, it works OK, but I am wondering how to tell if I can go higher quality at some point, if DL is a viable option. I dont want to just waste a DL, if what I already have is as good as it gets.
    I know that the answer has stared me in the eye on many occasions, but I just cannot find, what I think I am looking for.
    TIA,
    Hunt

    Bill.
    Try running a sort of "manual Bit-Budget" to see what the numbers say.
    DVD5 = 37,600 Megabits.
    DVD9 = 68,000 Megabits.
    Ideally, we subtract an overhead of 4% to allow for variables.
    This gives us the following values:
    DVD5 = 36,000
    DVD9 = 65,000.
    Let us first subtract the Audio.
    1.75 hours at 0.448Mb/sec = 2,882.4 Megabits
    (0.448 (The data rate of DD 5.1) * 60 (seconds) *105 (minutes) )
    This leaves us with (36000 - 3000) = 33,000 Megabits.
    I do not know the running tome of the lead-in AVI clips, but let us assume 5 minutes in total.
    This gives us 33,000 megabits to fit 110 Minutes of Video.
    So.
    110 minutes = 6,600 seconds.
    33,000 / 6600 = 5 Megabits/second available for film.
    This is under 6, so will be a VBR encode with an average bitrate of 5Mb/sec.
    For DVD9.
    Same Audio.
    Same sums except the total megabits for video is larger, so we have
    65,000 - 3000 = 62,000.
    62,000 / 6600 = 9.3939 Mbits/second for the video is available.
    Now, the highest possible allowed rate for DVD-Video - 10.08 for all combined.
    For Audio & Video combined it is taken as 9.8 Mbits/second.
    On a pressed, or replicated disc this is fine.
    On written media we need to be more careful, so we set a peak video bitrate of 7Mb/sec - which although will not fill a DVD9, will present the highest possible compromise between playability on maximum number of players & highest quality.
    You may experiment & go as high as 8Mb/sec, but I would generaly not recommend this to written media, DL especially.
    There is a chance players will choke due to the higher error rate from the reduced reflectivity available with written media & DL media in particular.
    It does give you almost a 50% increase in bitrate on your video.
    Minimal is 40% gain in bits.
    This will certainly make your film look better.
    I think it is worthwhile going to DVD9.

  • Can't eject a DVD / Can't close DVD Player

    I was trying to view movie, just getting black screen and spinning wheel. Now won't let me eject DVD because it says "DVD Player is using it".  Can't close the application while spinning.  Any help would be appreciated.

    Go to the  menu and select Force Quit.  In the window that comes up select DVD Player and force quit it.
    Then you should be able to eject the disc normally.
    OT

  • How to Change Encore Automatic Transcode Settings?

    I normally use Encore CS6 Automatic Settings because I have no idea how big the file will be and Encore automatically does the math for me. I want to change the Automatic DVD setting to Progressive but it is says "Lower Field First" and it is grayed out. How do I change it?

    Does PR report the size of both files combined when exporting demuxed? (I don't know.)
    Remember that a DVD called "4.7 Gigabytes" is really only 4.38GB. I don't know which version PR reports (GB or GiB). Encore, naturally, reports using one version in one panel and the other in another panel.
    For example, in the Encore project panel, it will report a file size as X.XGB. But when it lists the amount of the disk used and free in the build panel, it is reporting bytes with "GB" after it.
    Encore uses padding (It says the file will be bigger than it calculates) for bluray, but not DVD. Main point: it is difficult to calculate using Encore's (and probably PR's) stated estimates.
    Remember than until Encore (any authoring program) combines the demuxed video and audio streams (potentially multiple audio streams) during the build, it really does not know how big the files will be.
    I played the DVD it burned and it also looked all deinterlaced and jaggedy.
    I'm still not clear re the field issues in your material.
    Are you sure than Encore did not transcode the material again? What did encore say on import in the DVD transcode status column? Do not transcode?

  • How the DVD image on screen varies in size .....

    So I have my project on DVD and am pleased, in fact amazed at how good the quality is but there's one little frustrating niggle!
    In order to keep text on some of my graphic images on screen, in the timeline I've had to reduce the size of the overall image. Once converted to DVD, there will be a black border around the image on a Sony TV. Play it on a different TV (LG perhaps) and that gap is filled so it fits very smartly on the 16:9 screen. In fact the text is very close to the edge. And if I stuck strictly to the title safe boundaries, on the Sony TV the black border would be even wider. Gosh I hope this is making sense!
    Video footage is of course fine because no-one is gonna notice what's missing around the perimeters, unless of course some text appears there too but it would never go all the way to the edge.
    Ideally it would be perfect if the graphic designers designed the image so the text wasn't so close to the edge of the graphic but there's nothing I can do about that now.
    So a whole lot of these DVDs are going out to various places here and there and on various screens and in many cases the screen will be filled but in some cases it won't and will look a bit average.
    By the way the screens are on the same settings, 16:9, Full screen.
    Is there a simple solution to this? Thanks for stayin' with me.
    Peter

    Ideally it would be perfect if the graphic designers designed the image so the text wasn't so close to the edge of the graphic but there's nothing I can do about that now.
    Inform your designers that Photoshop includes templates that conform to TV & Video specifications.
    They even have the Action and Title Safe guides switched on by default.
    Look in the File > New menu bar item then click the Preset button to find the templates.
    For stuff like titles and logos that need to be composited, they should deliver .TIFF files with a transparent background.

  • How can I export an image from Illustrator same canvas size and custom resolution?

    Hey all.  i am using Adobe Illustrator CS5 for creating images for iPhone app icons the size of image 374 px 374 px and 264 ppi. i created an image same size and ppi .the problem after export the image file size changing to  1371px x 1371px and 264 ppi pixel dimension.How can I export same canvas size and same resolution file from illustrator

    10111980,
    If you just forget about PPI and use Save for Web, you will get the 374 x 374 pixel size.
    The 1371 x 1371 pixels is because you somehow increase the resolution by 264/72.
    You should never mix pixel by pixel sizes and PPI.
    The 374 x 374 pixels is the actual image size. At 264 PPI that will be about 1.417 inches. At 72 PPI that will be about 5.194 inches.

  • How Can I replace an image and save the same size as the previous?

    I want to replace an image in a PDF, but I would like to keep the same size, and location as the previous. I have tried to to it, but the new image takes a different size.
    This is a PDF exported from an InDesign template.

    Thank you.
    The problem is that the person to edit the PDF doesn´t have ID and doesn't know how to use it.
    The idea is that the design department create very sharp ID templates for people from other departments of the company only have to replace information (text and image).
    We are looking for a program to edit PDF files and function as templates forreplacement information.

  • Transcode settings in Encore CS3 for 24 frames?

    Ok so I exported my 3 short films (all 23.976) and then dropped them into encore. Used the "automatic" transcode settings, and burned a DVD. Looks like crap. I found I can make my own preset for transcoding, so what settings should I be using to make the video not jittery and blurry.I tried putting the transcode setting to 23.976, and it sped the video up, and left the audio at the same speed....which doesn`t make sense. My source video is 23.976....so thats not the right way to do it. How do I make a 24 frames DVD?

    How do I make a 24 frames DVD?
    My own experience with this is that you must create a 24p MPEG2 file with appropriate pulldown flags for use in Encore.  Any other option and Encore will mess up the pulldown.

  • DVD image is degraded at edges, particularly moving shots

    Hi all - I edited on Avid Xpress Pro 5.6 and exported a Quicktime reference file to Adobe Encore 2.0. I then transcoded using the 'PAL Progressive High Quality 7MB 2 Pass' setting.
    The resulting DVD is very high quality but the edges of objects in the frame appear degraded when moving (worse with really quick movement), not pixellated so much as shredded.
    Does anyone have any idea why this might be and what could be done to correct? I tried burning a second DVD using the automatic transcode settings which made the image shudder all the way through.
    Many thanks for your help.
    Best

    hi! I upgraded from 1.5 to cs3 encore in the past few months. Used to use automatic transcoding in 1.5 all the time. Upgraded to CS3 and automatic transcoding always produces the same effect you are describing. I call it jittery video. You especially see it with panning the camera, people walking by the camera. My suspicion is reinforced by what you say you used, progressive.
    I would try using the same setting and then editing it, only changing the progressive setting to interlaced and using lower field.
    I'm eager to hear if that solves the problem. I don't think I can change the automatic setting to use interlaced instead, which is disappointing because automatic calculates the bit rate for me. I also wonder though if using a progressive camera and then using a progressive mode also solves the problem.

  • Placing an image exactly into the page size everrytime, can it be done?

    hi,
    I know a bit about in design however was wondering:
    can I place an image exactly into the page size everrytime so it copies the exact measurements?
    helen

    Depends on the version of InDesign. Starting in CS3, if memory serves, you can put a frame on the master page and pre-set the fitting parameters, or assign an object style that includes the fitting options.
    Anything you place into such a frame would honor the fitting options you set.
    Peter

  • Best transcode settings for 20+ minute sports video DVD?

    I've been producing videos and DVDs for a while but I'm new to Encore. From my initial experience, the finished quality is much better than the Apple iDVD that I have been using. While I'm very happy with the DVD, I'd like to see if I can get better quality results.
    Yes, I'm going from HD > SD (DVD) and I understand it's not the same thing and that the resolution is much less. I would just like help with the DVD transcode settings that I'll use to build my DVD.
    I'm exporting standalone quicktime movie from FCE with no custom settings.
    My quicktime file resolution is 1920 x 1080 @ 29.97 fps.
    My videos are usually about 20-25 minutes long and have lots of motion in them. Any suggestions are requested.
    I'm very happy with the color but some of the motion looks a little jumpy at times and some of the stills aren't as crisp as I'd like.
    Thanks,
    Bob

    Time for the proverbial spanner in the works.
    If you are in NTSC lands, and your source footage is HD at 24fps, you could always try encoding to the 24p MPEG-2-DVD setting.
    This will put the progressive scan footage on the DVD at 24p, without degrading it to interlaced - and on an upscaling player you will get output at 24p.
    If the disc is played on a non upscaling system, the player will automatically pull to 29.97, so you lose nothing and gain a lot.
    The Adobe Media Encoder does a fine job of the 24p for DVD encoding as well - just remember to render out as elementary streams (.m2v and .WAV) - do not use the Dolby Digital encoder at this point (unless you need the SurCode 5.1 of course) and use LPCM - let Encore handle this.

  • FCPX Project Render Settings - Can you edit in h.264 and Transcode/render only used clips on timeline to Prores during render?

    I have a question on the PROJECT RENDER settings in FCP X. It’s seems to me that one could theoretically import and edit entirely with original h.264 video files without needing to Transcode to ProRes422. Once you’re done with your edit and want to get the added benefits of COLOR GRADING in ProRes422 color space, it seems that FCPX will automatically render your edit in ProRes422 according to these preferences. In that case, a color grade could be applied to the whole edit, and be automatically transcoded/rendered into ProRes 422 during the render process. After rendering, what would show up on the viewer and what would EXPORT would be the rendered Prores files and not the original h.264 files. This saves a lot of time and space of transcoding ALL your media, and in theory should enable you to edit NATIVE video formats like h.264, with automatic benefits of ProRes during render.  I'm assuming the render may take longer because FCPX is having to convert h.264 video files to ProRes422 while rendering. This may be one drawback. But will you your color grade actually use the 4:2:0 color space of the h.264 native media, or will it utilize 4:2:2 color space, since the render files are set to render to ProRes422 ? Can anyone please confirm that this theory is correct and optimal for certain work flows?? Thanks!

    Thanks Wild. That's what I thought - in that the render files would be converted to ProRes422 codec. So do you or anyone else think that there is an advantage to having the 4:2:0 original file be processed in a 4:2:2 color space?
    Yes there is an advantage, any effects and grading will look better than in a 4:2:0 space.
    Most professionals online seem to think so. Also - will rendering of heavy effects and color grading take longer using this method because it's having to convert h.264 media to ProRes during render?
    Yes, it will definitely take longer.
    Can anyone verify from a technical standpoint whether editing and color grading in this workflow will see the same benefits as having transcoded the h.264 media to ProRes in the first place?
    Same benefits from a final product view point, you lose on rendering time though and if you have lots of effects things will seem slow as it will have render everytime from the h264 file rather than a Pro Res file for every change you make. This may be fine on a higher end mac but I'm sure just pummels an older lower end mac as to being almost useless.

  • HELP...DVD image file compression settings for youtube.

    HELP...I am mounting a DVD Image from a file on the HD. I would like to compress to use on Youtube.
    What are the best settings? I have a account with YT which allows for more than the 15minute standard. I will be uploading 2hrs worth at times
    Can I batch compress several mounted images?
    I'm using Compressor bu if it is easier I have Handbrake and Mpeg SteamClip.
    Thanks
    Bill
    [email protected]

    Compressor has a preset for youTube videos... Pick the one that closely matches your video:
    Compressor YouTube settings has Frame Reorder set to on by default. YouTube doesn't like Frame Reorder, set it to off. Here are YouTube guidelines for Video set to them:
    http://support.google.com/youtube/bin/static.py?hl=en&topic=1728570&guide=172858 5&page=guide.cs
    Click the links to the left for more info about encoding videos.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Lumia 900 - WEIRD - Hairline Crack appeared out of...

    First let me start by telling: - I take amazing care of my phone and I DID NOT dropped the phone and neither did anyone else in my family - I always make sure that I don't even keep my car keys or wallet in the same pocket as the phone - I ABSOLUTELY

  • Getting an arrayindexoutofbounds error when trying to run mail app

    here is the code, it compiles fine, but when i run it, i get an array index out of bunds error import java.util.Properties; import javax.mail.*; import javax.mail.internet.*; public class SimpleSender {   public static void main (String args[]) throw

  • Unable to install Snow Leopard

    I hope one of you has a solution for this strange problem. First off, this is for installation on a Macbook Pro Core Duo 1.83 with 2 GB RAM and 120 GB HD. _The Problem_ I can install and update Leopard no problem on this machine. However, when I try

  • BT Infinity Broadband - stay away. Extremely poor...

    Just switched to BT Infinity broadband. Unfortunately, I took the limited option as we do not download a lot but wanted the faster speeds. A big mistake. Regret going to BT. Issues that we have faced so far: 1) Installation could not be done on the f

  • Basic Advice for Framerate in FCP

    Let me start by saying that I'm not the most technically grounded editor out there. So if you can keep your answers as jargon free as possible, I'd appreciate it. Here's a thumbnail sketch of what we're doing... We shoot with a couple of different ca