Availability Check - Re-run

Hi
Can we do availablity check again per sales Order? (for all items in the Order) mass check and not to go through the items one by one...
This is to re-allocate all the unconfirmed orders once stocks arrive.
V_VA parameter is only material and plant.. does not specify the sales order number in the initial screen?
Thanks,

Hi,
T.code V_V2 helps to run the rescheduling in mass.
You are right, you can't directly input the sales order numbers, however in the material number field you can enter the material numbers or range of material numbers.
Regards,

Similar Messages

  • Material Availability Check for material launched in the future

    This is the requirement;
    We are launching a product in the future. Lets use August 19th as our launch date This means that on August 19th our material can be goods issued. It cannot be shipped before then. There is no loading time etc. so our GI date usually = our material availability date
    Our production & procurement activities are executed allowing us to build our stocks so we have on hand stock of the material. We are receiving customer orders. Availability check is run and it is being confirmed for dates before the GI date (As we have stock in the system). For example, a sales order is created with a requested delivery date = 19th August; Would be acceptable if there was no transit time. But what if there is a route determined with a transit time for 2 days. This brings us to a material availability date of 17th August (And therefore a GI date of 17th August) which is before our product launch date. This needs to be avoided; the earliest material availability date must be 19th August as this will then be the earliest GI date.
    Therefore, the requirement is that availability is not confirmed for a date before our launch date. But is confirmed for the launch date.
    For example, how do Apple launch their products (like iPads)in future dates but entertain customer orders well before the date & then confirm the future dates to end customers? At the time when they receive the orders from end customers, I am sure that they would be holding stock of sufficient iPads for future deliveries.

    There may be more than one way you can fulfill the requirement. First is use of user exit. In enhancement ATP00001 (User exits in the availabity check), you can try using EXIT_SAPLATPC_002 (processing results of actual check). Here you can add logic that if the system date is less than Aug 19th 2011, then propse confirm date (material available date) as 19th of August 2011.
    The second option would be use of Replishment time (RLT) in the material master MRP3 view. You can maintain certains days to match August 19th (of course you need to reduct one day when the days go-by). At the same time in t.code OVZ9, you need to uncheck the box check without RLT for the combination of availability check rule and availabity check group. After August 19th, you can check the box again after removing the RLT time in material master. My preference is to go with first option.
    Regards,

  • Availability check gives missing parts because of POu200F

    Hello All,
    For production order creation and order release we have different types of availability checks:
    1: Order creation: check all purchase orders
    2: Order release: do not take purchase orders into account
    The problem with this is that as soon as we want to release a production order, the future purchase orders are not taken into account, but the corresponding production orders (created ones) are. This yields missing parts at release, even though there is enough in stock.
    How can this be solved?
    Regards,
    Marc

    Hi!
    I came across that post previously & have already gone through each setting on it.
    The Check Rule has been maintained correctly in config via txn OPPJ.
    My issue is that it's not being displayed on the Missing Parts view of MDVP, but it is when I look @ the Availability Check when run on the Planned Order.
    The Check Rule column is blank on MDVP but it's populated on MD12.
    Any idea why?
    Thanks,
    k

  • Availability check at Warehouse level.

    We are creating Automatic Delivery and Pick Transfer Order from the Sales Order. Now when availability check is run at IM level stock is present.
    But, In Warehouse some bins are blocked for stock removal .
    So, Transfer Order is getting created for only stock available in WH.
    Question: Can I create a storage type (maybe interim) that stores the returned and blocked stock and such that this stock would not be considered for Availability check?
    Please advise.
    Thanks, Rohit.

    Hi
    The simple answer is NO because wherever you put the stock in WM the availability check only looks at IM and if it is available you will not have a problem until you come to pick it.
    There are two options I can think of to prevent this.
    1.  Create another St Location and transfer the stock that you cannot use to this st location - however this can be very messy.
    2. The easiest way is if there is stock that you cannot pick in WM because it is Genuinely unavailable then 'Block' the stock and place it on Status 'S' in both IM and WM and then the availability check will not see it.
    If however the stock is ok and it is only the block on the bin that is stopping you picking it then either remove the block or move the stock somewhere else.
    I hope that this helps

  • Availability check run requirement in the Sales order Save user Exit.

    Hi Gurus,
    As per the requirment we are using a user exit SAVE SALE ORDER PREPARE for BOM purpose to reconfirm the confirmation qty.
    Now we need to add one more logic in the same user exit, which will run the availabilty check run for each of the line items of the BOM and consider latest confirmation qty from it. So my concern is it possible that we can call the availabilty check run event with in the user exit SAVE SALE ORDER PREPARE or this not advisable?
    Please let me know..
      Regards,
      Babs

    HI Venkat,
    Thanks for your reply.Yes you are right availability check runs automatically at sub item level.
    But please note the customer requirment iteself is is little different from std BOM configuration.
    Currently the availabilty check is activated both at header and sub item level. They are maintaining the stock for header and sub item level.Also the these sub items are some time being sold as invidual materials. hence there exist a mismatch in the stock value between header and sub items.
    when a sales order is created both header and sub items will have confirmation with different value between each and the same mismatched values are being passed in to delivery. But the deliveries can not be processed for PGI because of the mismatched confirmation qty between header and item level.
    I guess now you the rrequirment.
    So we are using the SAVE SALE ORDER exit which will re check the confirmed qty between header and item and takes lowest confirmed qty and change the confirmed quantities from all the line items to lowest one, so that confirmation qty among all the line items are same. This is the first logic we are planning.
    Further there is one more additional process BOP need to be run for this header and sub items, which will change the confirmed qty based on the latest stock for individual line item. even in this case also the user exit SAVE Sale order is being called but we need to run the availability check run additionally because of which our requirment will be taken care.
    Regards,
    Babs

  • Block Stock consider during MRP Run and Stock availibility check

    Dear All,
    I am facing the stock availibility check , Sytem consider the Defective material which is Block in same storage location ,and system not generate the Planned order .
    -Blocked Material stock 100, and requirement 100 then system not generate the planned. Client need the system generate planned order 100 , Because 100 material is defective.
    I have configured the system scope of availibility , Block stock check remove , but problem is not solve.
    Thanks
    Rajesh Tiwari

    Dear ,
    Can you please re-check your MRP plant parametrs in OPPQ wether   you have selected blocked stock( Available Stock tab )  option by chance ?
    Please de-select the same  and re-run MRP.Generally MRP does not consider block stock  in net requirement calcualtion .One more thing  , MRP does material avilablity check as per OMJJ set up ( define availbality chek ) but does not consider the same while doing net requirement calcualtion to generate PR rather it goes down to MRP plant parametrs ( oppq or oppr )
    Hope this is clear
    Regards
    JH
    Edited by: Jiaul Haque on Sep 16, 2010 9:29 AM

  • How to include STO PR availability check while DRP run?

    Hello gurus,
    I will explain my scenario by following ex.
    1. Suppose i have a requirement in Plant A of quantity 500.
    2. Plant B has stock of 800 Q
    3. But there is a outbound STO PR of quantity 500 from PLANT B to Plant C.
    4. So, now when i run DRP, it is creating STO PR of quantity 500 from plant B to Plant A (actually it should not happen as there is already outbound STO PR.... point 3)
    My question is how i can take into consideration STO PR... Means actual available quantity in plant B should be 800-500 = 300.
    Its not happening currently.
    How can i activate this?  Is there any customisation related to this in Availability check or in plant parameters.
    Plz. help
    Navin

    Hello,
    As explained in my earlier example.....
    If there is a STO PR where
    ex.
    Supplying Plant is B -    so for plant B it is outbound as stock is going out
    Receiving Plant C -  for plant C it is inbound as stock is coming in.....
    so now look into my earlier example...u will understand it clearly....
    and i m running DRP....BY Zprogram......to create STO pr and program is not considering the quantity of sto pr..
    Please suggest...
    thanks,
    navin

  • AFS material availability check

    Hi Experts,
    Please help me in following.
    I have stock for my AFS material in unrest.use. Even system create Purchase order when I run MRP for requirement of Sales order.
    Vipul.

    Hi Vipul
    Please check in the MRP views what is the procurement type in the material master:
    It should not be F.
    Also check the transfer of requirements in SD basic functions wheteher it is activated in the requirement class and the schedule line level.
    Also check whetehr the Availability check you have defined the availabilty control in the MRP material master screenas individual requirements.
    Hope this will be helpful.
    regards,
    A  S

  • How to automatically confirm check pay run (payment process request) in R12

    Payment Method = check
    The payment process profile (ppp) settings are as follows:
    Processing Type=Printed
    Payment Completion Point = When the Payment Instruction is Formatted
    Default Payment Document= blank/null
    Payment File=Send to File
    My question is this. Is it possible or how do you configure oracle payments (PAYMENT PROCESS PROFILE [PPP] and/or PAYMENT PROCESS REQUEST [PPR])for check payments created as a file output like you have in 'EFT' instead of printing the checks and CONFIRM the PPR/payments AUTOMATICALLY after the checks/payments have been formatted.
    The reason we are doing this is because we want an external agency to print the checks for my organisation.
    What is happening at the moment is that the PPR runs and the payments file is created successfully. At this point, the PPR is in 'FORMATTED - READY FOR RECORDING' status. The PPR then remain in this status until it is manually confirmed by clicking the 'Take Action' icon in the 'payment instruction' tab and then clicking on 'CONFIRM'.
    If the PPR is left in the above status, then the next submitted check pay run errors because the payment document(s) are still locked by the pay run that is in the 'Formatted - Ready for Recording' state.
    If it is not possible to configure Oracle payments to auto confirm the check pay run of this type, is an API available that can be called to confirm check payments - once they are in the formatted status.
    I've looked at the following notes in 'My Oracle Support', but they are not much use.
    Note 1097547.1 is related to bug 8781032 which talks about "Automatic Initiate when Payment Process Request is Complete".
    and then Note 1215392.1 relates to enhancement request.
    Bug 10142423: GIVE AN OPTION IN PAYMENT PROCESS PROFILE TO SUBMIT POSITIVE PAY FILE AUTOMATIC
    Thanks.

    Try running this SQL
    SELECT
    r.calling_app_id,
    r.created_by,
    r.payment_service_request_id,
    r.creation_date,
    r.call_app_pay_service_req_code,
    fa.application_name,
    fu.user_name,
    r.payment_service_request_status
    FROM
    iby_pay_service_requests r,
    fnd_application_vl fa,
    fnd_user fu
    WHERE r.payment_service_request_id = <<your concurrent request ID>>
    AND r.calling_app_id = fa.application_id(+)
    AND r.created_by = fu.user_id(+)

  • Availability check in the background

    Hi,
    Please can anybody advise whether there are any standard reports/transactions whereby the availability check for sales documents (including scheduling agreements) can be ran in the background? i.e. is there any way to do a mass availability check
    The requirement is to re-run the availability check and confirm the proposed quantities in the background without having to enter each sales order and manually re-run the availability check.
    Example - order is received for 100 however 0 is confirmed for the requested date due to the availability check, the 100 is confirmed on later scheduline line once the stock has become available. Stock of 50 then comes available and we would like to confirm the 50 for the required date and the remaining 50 for when stock will be available. How to do this without entering the sales document item and manually running ATP.
    I have tried using V_V2 rescheduling report however it cannot be restricted by sales document number and does not give us the required proposals.
    Many Thanks

    Hi Tubby ,
    i am looking at this one
    Indicator 'Unconfirmed documents required'; Rescheduling
    The option 'unconfirmed documents required', which is preset, only carries out rescheduling for materials for which at least one unconfirmed transaction already exists.
    If rescheduling should also be carried out for materials, for which all transactions are confirmed, deselect the indicator. However, you should note that if you make this selection the quantity of data to be processed will increase.
    regards
    Prabhu

  • Availability check - sales order

    Hi experts,                              
    I've gone through the relevant info, but still hit the issue below. Pls help. Thx.                                                       
    Issue: How to include the created order (not delivered ) when running availability check?                                                       
    Example:                              
    Stock (storage location C) - 1pc                              
    sales order A - 1pc (confirmed in schedule line)                         
    sales order B - 2pcs (1pc confirmed, 1pc unconfirmed)                                                       
    Those two orders are created agaisnt storage location C. No other stocks against storage location C are available, such as on-order stock.                              
    In my understanding, order B cannot be confirmed as order A has been created firstly.                                    
    Background: As the customer just sells the purchased product, he places PO firstly, then sales order following. Thus, he requests new sales order creation to be based on the stock qty, created sales order qty, PO qty to be received & delivered sales order qty.                                                       
    For this sales scenario, availability check with ATP is activated, but not against product allocation. And the check boxes "incl.purchase orders", "include sales reqmts", "include deliveries" are checked in OVZ9 only.                              
    ps. "Check sales requirements" has been checked in Availability check control while "No storage location inspection" has not been checked.

    Dear Cathy
    Can you please reconfirm that the combination of availability check and checking rule in OVZ9 in which, you have selected the box "Include sales reqmts"  is the same value what you have maintained in material master MRP3 view for availability check ??
    If the availability check is same in both the cases, then try to create a fresh order and post the outcome.
    thanks
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • Availability Check : Confirmed Date in Sales Order.

    Hello Gurus,
    I have an issue with the availability check.
    Scenario :
    Customer has created an order for quantity 800 on 26th of Feb and accordingly when created the order go confirmed for 17th of March.
    The specific quanity(batch) of 800 was released from Quality to unrestricted on 27th of Feb.
    And Now that the stock is in unrestrictd the customer wants to deliver this material before 29th of Feb as against the 17th of March confirmed date.
    When we try to re run the availability check, since there are other open orders and deliveries against the material system proposes a new confirmed date alltogether which is still further ahead of 17th.
    Can some body advice me as to how do i ensure that the particular quantity can be sold before 29th.
    I have also tried running Backorder processing and Rescheduling which failed, It might also be because i might have not run them properly as i am new to the concept of backorder processing and rescheduling.
    Please guide me to correct this step wise.
    Thanks.

    please try as below:
    Back order processing is a functionality in SAP where you can change the committments and over-ride the blockage of stocks marked against sales documents/deliveries. For e.g. you receive an order from a very important customer for material "A" but the entire quantity of A is committed to another customer "B" via earlier sales orders and this is where BACK ORDER processing helps you to change the committment and shift stock due for B to A. This is the benefit of this funtionality.
    OMIH - Checking rule for updating backorders
    OPJL - Define new checking rule
    OPJJ - Define scope of check
    V_RA - Backorder Processing
    Data selection:-
    Sold-to-party Customer code Mandatory
    Sales Organization Mandatory
    Distribution Channel Mandatory
    Division Mandatory
    Changed confirmed quantity :-
    Tick the material you want to changed and click the Back order button Confirmed quantity that still can be changed are highlighted.
    V.15 - Backorder List
    Sales Organization Mandatory
    Distribution Channel Mandatory
    Division Mandatory

  • User Exit/BADI for Production Order Availability Check

    Hi PP experts,
    Is there any user exit or BADI which can be used for Production Order Availability Check during order creation/release or while running collective availability check (COMAC) to include additional check conditions such as do not commit quantity (commitment qty = 0) if storage location for a component is missing in the production order due to storage location is not maintained/specified for that component in the material master.
    Note: In this case the availability check is set (configured)  to check at the storage location level.

    Dear ,
    Availablity Check is not Plant Specific or Storage Loaction spefic .ATP does not check the stock for any particualar stock in storage loaction rather it cheks various stocks based inward and out ward movement time through PR/PO/Dependent /Planned Order /Stock Type  irrespective of any Storage Location .
    BAPI which can be used :
    1.BAPI_PRODORD_CHECK_MAT_AVAIL
    can we exclude materials of prod order in availability check
    what is availability check concept  how it is used in SAP
    Check the above if it is useful
    Regards
    JH

  • Material Availability check during work order creation and Release

    Hello All,
    We are checking material availability at creation as well as release
    Say we have Material XYZ=100 in stock MMBE
    Now XYZ =100 is say at normal storage location =75
    and scrap storage location=05 and serviceable =20
    Currently when availability check is performed it checks for 95 (It excludes scrap storage location 05 )
    but we want  Availability check to be only for normal stock =75 and not for Serviceable and Scrap location
    how to do this in configuration or via exits
    Since if the material is under Scrap location it is not counting in Availability check at work order creation this logic is working fine but I do know from where this control is put that when the material is in the stock of scrap it is not counting in Availability check for work orders.Same thing I want to extend it to Serviceable stock .
    Why not it is consider it for Scrap storage location , what is config or any MM enhancement
    So that when Availability check run it will not consider Materials at SCRAP as well as SERVISABLE storage location also.
    Please have your views on this
    Regards
    pratap

    Hello
    There are two option for your requiement
    1. Changing the status of the servisable storage location stock to restricted use stock . You can include or exclude this stock status material in OPJJ. This solution is not storage location dependent. It is stock status dependent.
    2. Please refer the enhancement for the storage location determination. I am not sure about this funtionality:
    For production orders the following enhancement is available:
    PPCO0005 enhancement for storage loc. determination/backflushing
    You can use this enhancement to change the storage location and the indicator 'backflushing' in the reservation.
    The enhancement PPCO0005 contains the following enhancement components:
    Function exit
    EXIT_SAPLCOSD_001 storage location determination/backflushing
    You can find the description in modification text of the function exit.
    You can find an example of the user exit in the function group XC01 in the include LXCO1F05.
    warm regards
    Ramakrishna

  • What's the relationship between  Availability check  &  Individual/coll.?

    Hi,
    In the material master (Tcode MM02), how does the following parameters affect each other?
    <b>MRP 3 - Availability check</b> (01 Daily requirements, 02 Individ.requirements...)
    <b>MRP 4 - Individual/collectively</b> (  Individual and collective requirements,1  Individual requirements only, 2   Collective requirements only)
    Thanks and best regards.

    AIR is a runtime that supports a superset of the Flash Player API. You use it to run mobile and desktop applications, as opposed to browser apps.
    Flex is a set of technologies for building either AIR apps or browser apps. It includes a framework of runtime classes (e.g, Button, DataGrid, etc.) to use in your applications, an SDK with a command-line compiler, and an IDE called Flash Builder (formerly Flex Builder) that supports intelligent editing, a design view, and a debugger.
    So, a brief statement of their relationship is that you can use Flex to build AIR apps.
    Gordon Smith
    Adobe Flex SDK Team

Maybe you are looking for

  • Öffnen von Fotos in Photoshop Elements

    This discussion has been automatically generated for: http://help.adobe.com/de_DE/lightroom/using/WS30BB1A73-0A01-4072-978C-56C8DE443A03.html.

  • 2006 macpro possibly using imac g5 as monitor

    As mentioned I have a 2006 macpro, it has a 5770 graphic card, I also have an old (in great condition) imac g5. I would like to use the g5 as a monitor via a vga connection. Now, the 5770 has a mini display port and the g5 has a display port, okay, I

  • T400 & T500 Battery size - what sticks out and what doesn't? *EMBEDDED IMAGES*

    I've been seeing a lot of discussion around the various notebook communities about batteries, and wanted to take a moment to discuss them. The big question on everybody's mind is: which batteries fit flush on the new T400 & T500, and which don't? I'm

  • Lost contact information in the last few days.

    When my daughter and I upgraded to smart phones from basic phones, we went to Backup Assistant to get our contacts.  We both got ALL contacts from both accounts.  She went in and deleted all the contact information she did not need (my stuff), but no

  • Tables affected during invoice validation in AP

    Hi, How to know what are the tables gets updated in backend when the invoice is validated from front end. Required all the table status before Invoice validation and after Invoice validation. Regards Saravanan.B