BAPI_GOODSMVT_CANCEL having MB01 as transaction type .

Hi All,
I am facing a strange problem. When I cancel a material document from MBST it gets cancelled and the new material document bears the transaction type as MBST. So far so good. Now when I am cancelling a material document from code ( BAPI_GOODSMVT_CANCEL ). it cancels the document but it puts the transaction type of MB01 (which I think its picking from the document being cancelled). I checcked in debug mode and it looks for some entry in T158 table which I am not sure how and what should be maintained. Any ideas how to have MBST using the code? I am working on ECC 6.0 .
Thanks
Anuj

What would that be ? We have the following settings: (in T158).
TCODE --- MBST
TRTYP --- H
BLAUM --- PR
FCODE --- ST
KZVAR --- S
KZTIT --- S
XSELE --- X
WEVER --- 2
Rest all the blanks.
Thanks
Anuj
Edited by: Anuj Sethi on Apr 30, 2009 12:55 AM

Similar Messages

Transaction type ZGC not possible (posting to affiliated company) in ABSO

Hi all,
We have depreciation areas 01, 30, 31, 32 .
dep area 30, 31, 32 inherits the values from 01.
We want to post credit value to dep area 01 after doing the aqusition .
Hence we created a seperate transaction type ZGC ( in aqusitions- Tcode AO73) and limited it to dep areas 01, 30, 31, 32.
Transaction type ZGC is having credit and " do not post to affliated company " radio button is selected.
Now the issue is when we run ABSO to do a credit post in dep area 01 we are getting the below error .
Transaction type ZGC not possible (posting to affiliated company)
Message no. AA390
Diagnosis
For the current document, you specified either implicitly (via the customer/vendor), or explicitly (with a manual entry), that this posting is to an affiliated company. In this case, Asset Accounting requires you to use special transaction types. This enables the system to separately identify such transactions.
Procedure
Check the line items that you have already entered, and the transaction type you entered.
Not sure why it is asking for affliated company .
It will be great if any one help on this why we are getting this issue.

Hi Daya,
Please try to choose Trans.Type 100 in AO73 transaction code and select the radio button Post to affiliated company under Posting type.
Thanks,
Kumar

"No transaction type is available for creating a transaction" service order

Hi all,
I am new in IC .
I try to create service order or service ticket for incoming calls
We are using CRM 7.0
After I confirm the account I try to create service order
But no screen displayed and error "No transaction type is available for creating a transaction" occurs
in customizing there is a transaction type SRVO, also I copied it to ZRVO
But here how can I define that this transaction type is assigned to this application??
Please reply in detail steps.
Thank you.

Hi Rupesh,
Thanks for your reply..
I made a lot of controls but I can't find where I am wrong..
My senario is, taking phones, create interaction record and create order for further investigation.
I copied IC_AGENT role.
I copied transaction type 0010 to Z010
I create business transaction named ZBTP for transaction type Z010
I made Define Transaction Types for Navigation for Z010
Then Define Business Role -> Assign Function Profiles
Here I assign my business transaction ZBTP to IC_BT function profile
But when I connect tot the system with user having this business role
I can create interaction record with type Z010, it is ok.
When I press Service Order it gives this error.
Work center id for Service order is : IC_UIU_SVO
I copied my business role from IC_AGENT, and here this work center id was not active
In my business role I made it active. Is this work center can't used in IC senario
Also how can I understand which transaction type is needed for it??
If I know which transaction type is needed to create service order or service ticket under IC, then I will control it of course..
I also copied transaction type TSVO(service IC) to ZSVO and do the above things for this type too..
But nothing changed..
Please help !!

Transaction type used for FA posting to depreciation area 01 (ordinary dep)

Hi Expert,
There is a difference between my ordinary dep area 01 and book dep area 03.
area 01 is having a USD100
area 03 is having zero USD
I need to zerolized area 01.
I have created a new TTY and limit the dep area posting to 01 in OAYA. However, when I tried to post via ABZE, it is giving me an error message AA350.
Diagnosis
According to Table T093A, if you use transaction type 050, area 03 has to adopt values from area 01 (chart of depreciation TPGL). However, the specifications made in Table TABWA for the two areas do not agree.
Procedure
Maintain the transaction type using the Customizing menu. Both areas have to have either the indicator 'propose for posting' or 'has to be posted'.
I have checked both tables and it is not allowing me to post to area 01 only. I have done this before by creating a new TTY and post to area 02 and it works.
Please advise soon how to rectify this.
Thanks.
Angel.

Hi,
please check ion OABC if area 02 takes over the values identically.
regards Bernhard

Transaction Type field not getting value in F-05 transaction

Hi All,
When ever we are doing a reverse posting for foreign currency valuation using F.05 Tcode it will create a BDC session where we can execute this batch Input session thru SM37.
This will use F-05 Tcode to post the the entries, but the problem is one of the field Transaction Type is not getting value for some of the GL account numbers range. This is totally SAP standard program take cares of it. Transaction type field value shuld be populated by '990' value for this GL account range, this is fixed. So is thr any User exit or Screen exit for this Tcode or how we can populate the value....
Help me...
Chandar
Edited by: Bala Chandar on Feb 12, 2009 1:25 PM
Edited by: Bala Chandar on Feb 12, 2009 1:28 PM
Edited by: Bala Chandar on Feb 12, 2009 1:33 PM

Hi Mr/Mrs Bala Chander,
I am having the same problem.
When running F.05 a BIM is created for GL account X. GL account X has a field status in which transaction type is defined as a required field because of BCS / ECCS. We have a substitution rule in place which should default the transaction type, based on several criteria. But when executing the BIM, I see that nothing is filled in field transaction type. Did you find a proper solution for your problem? Changing the field status is not an option in my opinion.
Regards,
Joep

Transaction Type in Asset History Sheet

Hi Friends,
After copying the asset history sheet program,
I added transaction type field (BWASL) to new asset history sheet (z_alr_87011990), but when the report is executed it is not picking the value.
Can any of you help out in solving this problem.
Regards

Did you ever figure out a solution to this problem. I am having a similar issue and would appreciate some assistance
Thank You

IHC - Transaction Type

Hi,
In IHC, after executing F110, entries get populated in IHC0, which are then posted.
My Question is from where does the system picks up Transaction type in IHC0. I checked config setting in table IHC_TAB_APM_TT, but my transaction type is not according to this table..
The IDOC while posting IHCO fails and there is no entry in F8BT for processing F111.
Any Suggestions?
Regards,
SAPFICO

Hi,
I am having a similar issue. What is the OSS Note number you referred?
Kalyan

Use of field - Transaction Type in F.01

Dear All,
Can anyone explain the use of field Transaction Type in Dynamic Selection in transaction code F.01.
If I have understood correctly, these are related to fixed assets. If I select any transaction type, say for instance 120, which is related to acquisitions, F.01 should display the related figures.
However, I do not get any display, inspite of having various transactions with transaction type 120.
Can anyone explain me why this is happening?

Hi,
I have gone into transaction f.01 and am unable to find the component Transaction type in dynamic selections. If however you want to find Transacttion type 120 use transaction SE16n and table ANEKPV add in the transaction types (technical name BWASL) add other parameters example company code, period etc to get the related information.
Award points if useful.
Sadie Gajanand

How to use Z transaction type while in the Transaction launcher Wizard?

In SPRO->CRM->Transactions->Basic Settings->Define transaction Types I can see a whole host of Z transaction types.
These define all sorts of business transaction defaults. Within the Transaction launcher Wizard there is a Transaction Type that can be entered, but I can only see three options, being 'BOR Transaction', 'URL Transaction' and ' M', for some reason. None of the transaction types shown in the above SPRO path are displayed.
Does anyone know how I can use my Z transation type. These are used by the config behind the Action Boxes for the Winclient IC, but I can not get the Transaction launcher wizard to see or use these. The SAP How-to Guide to tha Transaction Launcher says that only BOR and URL Transactions can be used (unless you have IS-U). If this is true then how does one provide all the information provided by the Transaction type. The whole idea of the transaction type is default this information in one area.
Anyone.
Jason

I think it is possible.
In CRMC_UI_NBLINKS if you look at the logical links you can see that SRV-ORD-DC has a Parameter of 'SRVO' with a certain Parameter Class.
If you were to check SPRO->CRM->Transactions_Basic Settings->Transaction Types you will see that SRVO exists as an entry. This logical ink is therefore using this Transaction type to extract characteristics etc.
Having said that, I need to call the sales order create with a certain transaction type, so I copied SLS-SLO-CR to a Z copy, added the Parameter of 'Z111' and also used the Parameter class of CL_CRM_UIU_BT_PARAM_CREATE.
This should now, in theory all work, and show the exact same transaction in the Webclient IC as it does in the Winclient IC as they are both using the same Transaction type. However, the Webclient transaction looks different in terms of fields etc., so I don't think it's working. after all.
Jason

Definition of Message Type and Transaction Type from the Implementation per

My assumption is that both, Notification Type and Message Types are same.
Is the above assumption right?
In Sol Man 4.0, the notification types required are
1) ABSC 2) SLF1 3) TASK
Are there any other notification types required for Sol Man 4.0?
The main transaction types required in Sol Man 4.0 are
SLFI, SLFT and SLFN
What is the significance of External Number range and Internal Number range used in the transaction type?

Hi
1 > A data type in a programming language is a set of data with values having predefined characteristics. Examples of data types are: integer, floating point unit number, character, string, and pointer.
The characteristic of columns and variables that defines what types of data values they can store. Examples include character, floating point and integer
Check out the details:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_type
A message type comprises a data type that describes the structure of a message. At the following points in SAP Exchange Infrastructure you can refer to the message to be exchanged at runtime by using the message type:
details:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/2d/c0633c3a892251e10000000a114084/content.htm
2) Regarding the difference between XI 3.0 and PI 7.0, this threads will clear your doubts:
difference between XI 3.0 and P.I 7.0
Difference/ changes from XI 3.0 to PI 7.0
Regard's
Chetan Ahuja

Partner Determination using Transaction Type in Org Model

Hi Experts,
I am a functional consultant working on CRM 5.0 and currently customizing the partner determination procedure for transaction Lead. As per the business requirement, for all the leads created by default the system should determine a Lead Qualifier in the transaction Lead. In order to achieve this I am using rule 14000146 Orgman_14 which provides org unit for a transaction type. In the org model I am having a org unit defined as "Lead Management Dept" as well as I have created and assigned position Lead Qualifier and assigned emp to this position too. Now I have defined the sales attributes for this Org Unit "Lead Management Dept" and for the sales attribute "Transaction Type" filled in value as Y001 which is my transaction type for Lead.
The issue is that this defined attribute is not inherited by the position although this position is assigned to the above mentioned Org Unit and therefore the partner is not getting determined in the transaction. Can someone provide guidance about this issue? How to inherit this attribute to position so that the position is determined in the PDP? or any other alternative for this situation??
Thnaks and regards
Ambar Adhav

Hi,
Try transaction OOATTRCUST, scenario SALE> Attributes/Scenarios:
For PROC_TYPE attribute try to change the Inherit.Type and see how the system behaves.
Regards,
Susana Messias

How to use ZSLFN transaction type

Dear Experts,
We are using standard service desk functionality and we have two transaction types named SLFN & ZLFN.We have a BW & ECC system connected to our solution manager.My requirement is that the BW system should use SLFN transaction type and ECC should use ZLFN transaction type.
Regards,
Sachin.

I think it is possible.
In CRMC_UI_NBLINKS if you look at the logical links you can see that SRV-ORD-DC has a Parameter of 'SRVO' with a certain Parameter Class.
If you were to check SPRO->CRM->Transactions_Basic Settings->Transaction Types you will see that SRVO exists as an entry. This logical ink is therefore using this Transaction type to extract characteristics etc.
Having said that, I need to call the sales order create with a certain transaction type, so I copied SLS-SLO-CR to a Z copy, added the Parameter of 'Z111' and also used the Parameter class of CL_CRM_UIU_BT_PARAM_CREATE.
This should now, in theory all work, and show the exact same transaction in the Webclient IC as it does in the Winclient IC as they are both using the same Transaction type. However, the Webclient transaction looks different in terms of fields etc., so I don't think it's working. after all.
Jason

Container-Managed Transaction Type Attributes not working as expected

I am having a problem with the container-managed transactions not working as expected. I have 2 methods that work as follows:
MethodA{
for(a lot)
call MethodB;
@Transaction Type = RequiresNew
MethodB{
EntityManager Persist to database
I want the code in MethodB to be committed to the database when methodB returns. The problem is that I am running out of memory and MethodA is failing. When methodA fails after numerous calls to MethodB nothing is persisted to the database.
It is my understanding that when using requires new transactions that a new transaction is started for each call to the method and ends when the method returns while the calling method transaction is suspended.
How am I misunderstanding the requiresNew transaction attribute. What can I do to make a batch insert into my database that will not run out of memory (commit when a methodB returns)?
Thanks in advance.

The problem is that EJB invocation semantics for security, container-managed transactions, etc.
only apply when an invocation is made through an EJB reference. In your case, you are directly
invoking the implementation method from within the bean. The EJB container has no idea that's
happening. It's no different than invoking a utility method.
In order to get the behavior you'd like, you need to retrieve a reference to your own bean and invoke
through that. You can use SessionContext.getBusinessObject() to get the EJB reference for the
business interface through which the method in question is exposed.
--ken

Restrict output of opportunities by transaction type on BP overview

Hi,
When looking at the Opportunities assignment block in the BP overview, I need to restrict the opportunities to show only those with a certain transaction type.
Can someone suggest the best way to go about doing this? I guess it is going to involve some coding, but can you suggest how / where this can be done?
Thanks
Matt.

Matt,
The problem with the approach you suggested is the system gets the first 100 or however it is configured opportunities. That means say you have
300 oppportunities out of which 100 are the type you don't want to see and 200 are what you want to see. You could then end up with only 50 displayed instead of the max limit via the filter. In addition the performance hit of filtering after the database search would not be recommended.
That's why there is a badi provided to fine tune the filtering in order to provide a more consistent result. Also that type of filtering is not a good idea to build in the UI component level, but rather in the BOL level and below. It will prevent you from having to reimplement the logic upon any future upgrades or enhancement packs. If you are already on CRM 7 not as much of concern, but if you are on CRM 2007 I would use the badi instead. Honestly I personally only do component enhancements when a BADI is not available to achieve what I want.
Take care,
Stephen

MB01 with movement type 161

Dear Friends,
However while trying to do this transaction with MB01 and mvmt type 161 Returs good to vendors
while giving input vendor name, material, Qty Unit Storage Location, Plant, Mvmt Type 161 then error showing enter Purchase Group. but the field not showing any where in the screen. even i tried through PO also. same error showing.
where i need to input Purchase Org
please advice or methods to solve this issue.
thanks & Regards,
Have a nice Day!!!!
Rajesh G

Hi Rajesh_k1975
Actually in Movement type 161 option to create the auto PO while creating the MB01 with vendor return.
In this case of auto PO. if you have not maintain the Info record then for PO creation it will not allow to post the doc.
so, check if you have info record .
if not , please create.
after document created , you can view the PO number created through MB01 in background from MB03.
SAM

BAPI_GOODSMVT_CANCEL having MB01 as transaction type .

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for